technical

Power Skiving of Cylindrical

Gears on Different Machine
Platforms
Dr. H.J. Stadtfeld
It has long been known that the skiving
process for machining internal gears is
multiple times faster than shaping, and
more flexible than broaching, due to skivings continuous chip removal capability.
However, skiving has always presented
a challenge to machines and tools. With
the relatively low dynamic stiffness in
the gear trains of mechanical machines,
as well as the fast wear of uncoated cutters, skiving of cylindrical gears never
achieved acceptance in shaping or hobbing until recently. Indeed, the latest
machine tools with direct drive train
and stiff electronic gearboxes, complex
tool geometry and the latest coating technology now present an optimal opportunity for the skiving process, including
the soft-skiving of cylindrical gears.

the helix angle. However, a helix angle of

20 or greater offers the possibility to be
matched with the shaft angle and to use
a simplified spur gear-style shaper cutter for the skiving operation. Also in this
case, the stroke motion is oriented in Y
direction but an incremental rotation 2,
which depends on the stroke feed, has
to be added to 1. The shaft angle can
also be defined differently than the helix
angle and it will still require the same
incremental 2, but the tool front face
orientation and side relief angles have to
be calculated from the difference between
helix angle and the shaft angle . The side
view to the right (Fig. 1) shows a second
possible tool inclination which is called

the tilt angle. This tool tilt angle can

be used to increase the effective relief
angles between the blades and the slots; it
can also be used to eliminate interferences between the back-side of a long spur
gear-style shaper cutter with minimum
relief angles (see section Skiving Tools).
Within limits, it is also possible to utilize
the tilt angle for pressure angle corrections.
The three-dimensional side view (Fig.
2) shows an internal helical gear with a
shaft angle between work and tool. The
graphic shows the base angular velocities of the work 1 and the formula for
its calculation. Figure 2 also includes
the incremental angular velocity 2 and

The Power Skiving Machine

Setup Definitions

The geometric setup of a skiving cutter

relative to an internal ring gear is shown
(Fig. 1). The front view of the generating gear system is shown in the upper
left graphic. The ring gear is oriented in
the main coordinate system with its axis
of rotation collinear to the Y4 axis. The
cutter center (origin of Rw) is positioned
out of the center of Y4 in the X4 -Z4 plane
by a radial distance vector Ex. The pitch
circles of the cutter and the ring gear contact tangentially at the lowest point of the
pitch circle. The top view, which shows
the tool inclination angle or shaft angle ,
is drawn below the front view. In case of a
spur gear the stroke motion is directed in
line with the Y axis. The relative velocity
required as cutting motion is generated
with a shaft angle around the X4 axis of
the coordinate system shown in Figure 1.
In case of a helical gear, the cutter inclination can be chosen independently from

Figure 1Basic geometry and kinematics of power skiving.

Printed with permission of the copyright holder, the American Gear Manufacturers Association, 1001 N. Fairfax Street, Fifth Floor, Alexandria, VA 22314-1587. Statements
presented in this paper are those of the author(s) and may not represent the position or opinion of the American Gear Manufacturers Association

52

GEAR TECHNOLOGY|January/February 2014

[www.geartechnology.com]

the formula to calculate it from the helix

angle and the axial feed motion (stroke
motion). The cutting velocity is calculated as the difference vector between
the circumferential velocity vectors of
work and tool in the cutting zone. Figure
3 shows a top view of the configuration
between tool and work with the velocity
vectors.
The reference profile of the tool is
determined from the reference profile
of the work applying the procedure (Fig.
4). The reference profile of the work with
pressure angles 1 and 2 and point width
W p is drawn as a trapezoidal channel,
and it is cut with a plane under the shaft
angle (Fig. 4, top, right). The profile is
defined by the intersecting lines between
the plane and channel, and it represents
the reference profile of the tool. This tool
reference profile is used in order to generate the involute in the tool cutting front
(Fig. 4, bottom right).
The machine setting calculation is
shown (Fig. 5, top) on the example of a
bevel gear cutting machine. The explanation of the formula symbols are:
X, Y, Z Machine axis directions (Y is
perpendicular to the drawing
plane)

Shaft angle between cutter and
work
CRT
Cutter reference height
B
Cutter swing angle
PZ Pivot distance to spindle front in
Z direction if B=0
PX Pivot distance to spindle center
line in X direction if B=0
Z1, Z2 Components in Z direction
Depending on the helix directions in
work and cutter, the cutting takes place
below or above the work gear center line
in order to keep the B axis angle below
90. Should there be no corrections needed, the crossing point between the cutter
axis and the work axis lies in the cutter
reference plane. The bottom section of
Figure 5 shows the cutting blade definitions as reference.

Chip Formation and Optimization

of Chip Load

Figure 2Pitch cylinders of work and tool.

Figure 3Calculation of cutting velocity.

Although the chip formation process of

skiving appears different when compared
to traditional gear cutting operations,
understanding it is a fundamental task in
recognizing weaknesses or strength of the
skiving process. Power skiving has been
called a combination of cold forming
January/February 2014|GEAR TECHNOLOGY

53

technical
and cutting. But is not every metal removing process such a combination? The task
of a successful process is an economical
combination of speed, part quality, tool
life (tool-cost-per-part), and of course the
investment in the machine tool.
The plane in Figure 6 shows a segment
of an internal ring gear to be skived, and
it is defined along the face width at the
point where the last generating occurs.
The second cutting tooth from the left
has just entered into a part of the slot
which is already rolled out from the previous cutting action. The third cutting
tooth is advanced towards the observer
and just begins a generating cut (see top
view of unrolled partial slots). The generating cut continues to cut tooth number six. The lowest scallop in the top
view was generated between the second
and sixth cutting blade position. Cutting
blades seven and eight finish the form cut
end section of the slot.
A photograph of the tooth sequence
from Figure 6 is shown in Figure 7 as a
close-up. As one blade rotates through
the cutting mesh, the orange-colored
scallop is generated and the green-colored section is form-cut. The entire

Figure 4Procedure for the calculation of the tool reference profile.

cutting action of one blade produces

one chip, which includes the material
removal from generating and form cutting. Beginning with its addendum, the
right side of the blade gradually engages
with the gear slot during the generating
motion. It approaches the tip, and at this
point it smoothly peels the chip up to the
top of the gear. As the generation works
its way from the right flank of the gear
to the tip, and from this point up to the
flank, every section that had at one point
chip removing contact with the work now

stays in contact to the end of the cut.

Only the generating chip removal (within
the scallop) converts quickly into formcutting.
The form-cutting section might seem
like an interesting phenomenon but it can
be found in a similar form in all other
generating cylindrical or bevel gear cutting methods. It is also common in all
generating and form-cutting processes,
that the tip region of the blades have the
longest exposure to chip removal action
within the green form-cutting region.

Figure 5Calculation of machine settings

(top) and cutting blade definitions
(bottom).

54

GEAR TECHNOLOGY|January/February 2014

[www.geartechnology.com]

Since the front face of power skiving

blades is a plane that connects the cutting
edges for both flanks, the side rake angle
cannot be positive for both cutting edges.
An acceptable compromise is a side rake
angle of zero degrees. In order to enhance
the cutting performance of the blade tip,
a significant top rake angle can be introduced. However, peripheral cutter heads
with carbide blades and top rake angles
above 4 seem to fail with blade chipping
in the tip area (Fig. 5).
Power skiving chips with a 5 magnification are shown (Fig. 8, top). The
first chip (A) is a side chip from the first
roughing pass of a module 4.0mm gear
with a 5mm in-feed. The second chip
(B) is U-shaped, which means, unlike
the first chip, the side chips and the bottom chip have not been separated. This
chip is from a second roughing pass with
3mm in-feed. The third chip (C) is from
a finishing pass with 1mm in-feed. The
result of an unrolled and uncompressed
chip that is just sheared off is a curved
channel like that indicated in the drawing at the bottom left of Figure 8. The two
side walls, as well as the bottom section
of the channel, are rolled up individually
and mostly without breaking into separate pieces.
The microscope photo (Fig. 8, bottom
right) shows a cross-section through the
left wing of one chip with a magnification
of 100. At the beginning of cutting (center of the chip spiral), the chip thickness
is small and increases slightly during the
rather short generating section (orange
scallop, Fig. 7). A proportional increase
of the chip thickness occurs from the
beginning to the end of the form-cutting
section (Fig. 7, green area).
The right sides of the chips are thinner than the left sides, and a crack in the
middle of the rolled-up sidewall can be
observed. As the bottom left image indicates, the right channel wall has a more
complex shape than the left side, and the
skiving kinematic provides slightly different cutting conditions on both flanks.
This explains differences in chip thickness between the two sides and the additional crack of the right side of the chip.
In order to avoid U-shaped chips,
Gleason has developed an in-feed strategy. After each stroke an in-feed amount
and a work angle set-over is applied in
order to generate L-shaped chips (Fig. 9,

Figure 6Cutting sequence from engagement to exit.

Figure 7Top view of unrolled partial real slots (top) and graphics (bottom).

left); L-shaped chips reduce the wear on

the cutting blades.
It is possible to alternate the in-feed
work angle set-over direction from part
to part in order to achieve even tool wear.
Another possibility is to apply a positive side rake (e.g., 2) to the left side of
the blade (Fig. 8) that will enhance the
cutting action on this side and generate L-shaped chips. If the resulting feed
direction (Fig. 8) is not exactly parallel
to the right flank, but about 3 steeper,
then a perfect clean-up of the right flank
is guaranteed and the surface finish of the
right flank will be equal or slightly better
than the finish on the left flank.

HSS Cutters for Power Skiving

and Surface Speed Calculation

Traditionally, power skiving is performed

with common shaper cutters. However, a
variety of different tools used for power
skiving is shown; the first cutter (Fig.
10, left) is a shaft type that is slightly
tapered without helix angle in the cutting teeth. This cutter can be used for
gears with a helix angle. The shaft angle
between cutter and work will be set to the
helix angle of the work. This also means
that the helix angle of the work should
be above 10 in order to generate sufficient cutting speed. Due to the straight
nature of the cutting teeth, workpieces
January/February 2014|GEAR TECHNOLOGY

55

technical

Figure 8Analysis of chip formation.

Figure 9In-feed strategy for optimized chip formation (Refs. 2, 3).

Figure 10Solid HSS power skiving cutters coated with TiN and AlCroNite.

56

GEAR TECHNOLOGY|January/February 2014

with small diameter and large face width

might cause interference between the slot
and the far end of the cutting blade. The
skiving cutter in the center (Fig. 10) is a
wafer cutter with only a few re-sharpenings. The cutting teeth are straight, which
makes this cutter only suitable for workpieces with a helix angle. The wafer cutter has very short, relieved teeth, which
will prevent interference problems in case
of helical slots that wind around a smalldiameter workpiece.
The skiving cutter on the right (Fig. 10)
has serrated blade front faces and teeth
that are oriented under a helix angle; the
black coatings are AlCroNite and the
golden coating is TiN.
If the helix angle of the workpiece is
15 and the tool helix angle is 20, then
the shaft angle between skiving cutter
and work has to be set up to 5 (same
helix direction). If the helix directions are
opposite, then a shaft angle of 35 must
be used. An interesting situation presents
itself if the gear helix angle of the work is
identical to the cutter helix angle (same
amount and same hand). In this case the
shaft angle between cutter and work is
zero, and no skiving motion is generated. The calculation of the cutting surface
speed, depending on the helix angle of
the work and the shaft angle , is shown
(Fig. 11). The upper graphic represents
the unrolled pitch cylinder with teeth and
slots indicated (see also Fig. 11, right side
graphic) for a spur gear. With =0, the
formula is simplified to the first special
case. The lower graphic shows the formula simplification for the second special
case, which occurs if the helix angle is
equal to shaft angle . The cutting velocity formula also considersnext to the
circumferential velocity at the work gear
pitch diameterthe helix angle of the
work and the shaft angle between work
and skiving cutter. The cutting velocity vector is automatically directed in the
flank lead direction if the formula (Fig.
11) is applied. Although the formula indicates some interplay between and , the
major parameter for generation of sufficient cutting velocity is the shaft angle
between the work and tool axes.

[www.geartechnology.com]

High-Speed Carbide Cutter Head

System for Power Skiving

A new type of cutter head PentacPS

that uses stick blades has been developed especially for power skiving (Fig.
12). The blade material is carbide and
the blade profiles are 3-face-ground
and all-around-coated. The blade profile resembles an involute that is derived
from the tool reference profile (Fig. 4).
The blades can either be ground as full
profile bladesjust like the profiles of
the standard skiving cutters shown in
Figure 10or as alternating left flank/
right flank blades that allow it to realize sufficient side rake angles. This alternate blade arrangement offers very good
tool life and an exceptionally smooth cutting operation. However, the productivity is slightly lower than using full-profile
blades.
Due to the design of the PentacPS cutter head, the blades have spaces between
them that are larger than the tooth thickness of the reference profile. PentacPS cutters are selected for a certain module, such
that the blades in the cutter head represent
every second, third or fourth slot of the
reference profile. Regarding low workpiece run-out and high spacing quality, it
is required to avoid a common denominator between the theoretical number of
skiving cutter teeth and the number of
work gear teeth. The same rule applies for
solid skiving cutters as well.
In order to establish a new cutter
design, a procedure was developed that
allows a minimum of cutter head types.
For example, external gears with a maximal pitch diameter of 360mm or internal
ring gears with a minimal pitch diameter of 450mm and above can be skived
with a 9-inch peripheral cutter head. The
spreadsheet in Figure 13 uses modules
from 2 to 7mm, in 0.5mm steps, to calculate a pitch diameter and the theoretical number of teeth z2. The value for z2
must be rounded up or down in order to
receive an integer number. This requires
a change in the pitch diameter of the tool.
The developed stick blade system allows
adjustment of the blade stick out by some
small amount to match the required pitch
diameter for the number of teeth selected.
However, the 9-inch-size cutter heads
only have blade numbers of 15, 17, 19,
21 and 23. In the next columns of the
spreadsheet (Fig. 13), all existing inte-

Figure 11Cutting velocity calculation.

Figure 12Stick blade cutter PentacPS for power skiving with carbide blades.

January/February 2014|GEAR TECHNOLOGY

57

technical

Figure 13Calculation scheme for cutter diameter and number of blades.

ger fractions between two and five are

determined. The goal is to find the largest number of slots available in the 9-inch
PentacPS line of cutters to assure the
maximal productivity. In other words,
the PentacPS cutter never represents the
theoretical tool tooth number with the
number of slotsrather, only a fraction thereof. The theoretical number of
tool teeth becomes the virtual tool tooth
number of which only a fraction is represented on the cutter head. If a number
is selected and typed in the spreadsheet
next to the actual fraction of slot and
theoretical tooth number, the resulting
number of cutter slots is shown in the last
column. If this number does not match
an existing cutter head, then a second or
third number has to be chosen until a
matching cutter is found.
Depending on the number of teeth of
the work gear, the virtual number of tool
teeth may be even, and never is a prime
number. This will not be of any disadvantage as long as a hunting-tooth relationship between work and virtual cutter
exists. In such cases the hunting-tooth
principle exists between work and real
cutter. The peripheral stick blade cutter design will physically prevent a fit of
the virtual number of blades next to each
other. The cutter drawing in Figure 14
represents each other tooth, as indicated
with the dashed drawn (virtual) blades
between the real blades.

Power Skiving Machines and

Software

Figure 14Virtual tool teeth.

58

GEAR TECHNOLOGY|January/February 2014

During the last years dedicated power

skiving machines have been introduced,
starting from very small gear sizes (below
100mm) up to 600mm gear diameter
(Fig. 15, left). A technology software was
developed that calculates machine settings from part geometry and chosen tool
parameters; the software also determines
the chip removal volume, depending on
the shaft angle between work and tool.
The optimal in-feed strategy utilizing
an involute roll simulation also features
an interference check by comparing the
tool path with the simulated slot surfaces
(Ref. 4).
For the convenience of both gear
engineer and machine setup personnel, the power skiving technology software resides on the control of the power
skiving machine. Coincidentally, dur[www.geartechnology.com]

ing development of the power skiving

process, it became apparent to Gleason
that there was interest in applying this
successful process to bevel gear cutting machines as well. Manufacturers
who wanted fuller optimization of
their Phoenix bevel cutting machines
began utilizing the power skiving process for prototyping or manufacturing
of small- and medium-batch sizes as a
value-added task for this rather versatile
machine. In order to address this interest, Gleason applied the power skiving
developments that had been conducted
until 2012and strictly on dedicated
machinesto all current Phoenix bevel
gear cutting machines (Fig. 15, right);
Figure 15 shows a power skiving setup in
a Phoenix 600HC.
Along with this significant step, the
Gleason power skiving development team
was expanded from only cylindrical gear
experts to a mix of cylindrical and bevel
gear experts. The experience in bevel gear
manufacturing using carbide stick blades
then led to development of the PentacPS
peripheral skiving cutter system, which in
turn was applied to the dedicated power
skiving machines as well.
As for power skiving, the Gleason
bevel gear cutting machines use the same
software as used on the PS machines.
Summary development, cycle optimization, and corrections are conducted
on the machinenot on a remote desktopas is common in bevel and hypoid gear manufacturing. Figure 16 shows
the main screens for gear data, process
parameter and workholding entry.
The power skiving technology software can also be used as a standalone
package on the gear engineers desktop.
This allows the gear engineer to conduct experiments and pre-optimizations
of future gear designs that will be softmachined by power skiving. The desktop software version is also more suitable
for the stick blade geometry calculation.
This calculation delivers a blade-grinding
summary following the same standards
used for bevel gear cutting blades. The
blade-grinding machine accepts those
summaries like summaries for regular
bevel gear cutting blades.
The technology software for power
skiving on Phoenix machines allows the
input of tooth thickness, depth and helix
angle corrections. Tooth thickness and

Figure 15Different machines with power skiving setup.

Figure 16Technology software process input screens (Ref. 4).

January/February 2014|GEAR TECHNOLOGY

59

technical

Figure 17Chips from wet/dry skiving and process temperature.

depth are coupled corrections that follow a certain strategy. The correct tooth
thickness has the higher priority than
the depth. In order to achieve the correct thickness, the slots can be cut deeper
within the limit the gear engineer allows.
It is not recommended to cut the slots
shallow because of implications like roll
interferences in the operation of the gearset. If the correct slot width cannot be
achieved within the given possibilities,
then the blades have to be corrected; or,
in case of an undersized slot, a side cutting in a second pass is possible, although
it adds unwanted cutting time. If both
flanks have similar, small unidirectional
pressure angle errors (same sign), then
a correction via the cutter tilt angle (Fig.
1) is possible; larger pressure angle errors
with inverse signs must be executed by
grinding corrected blades.

Wet or Dry Power Skiving?

A solid cutter from G50 (Rex76) material with an AlCroNite coating is suitable for a surface speed of 100m/min

60

GEAR TECHNOLOGY|January/February 2014

in a wet skiving environment. Carbide

stick blades (H10F) with an ALCRONAPro coating allow about 300m/min surface speed. However, regarding tool wear
it has to be considered that in skiving
very high rpms are required in order to
achieve the desired surface speed. This
in turn creates a profile sliding which
is superimposed to the cutting speed.
The profile sliding might have its highest
value at the blade tip, which has already a
long chip removing engagement path and
experiences due to the sliding and additional side relief wear.
Cutting trials in Power Skiving have
shown it is possible to reduce the surface
speed down to numbers between 150 and
200m/min (Under-Critical Speed, UCS)
and increase the in-feed and feed rate in
order to keep the productivity high, and
at the same time achieve a significant
improvement in tool life.
Chips from wet UCS skiving with
Alcrona-Pro coated carbide blades and
172m/min surface speed are shown in
the top row of Figure 17. The first rough-

ing pass used an in-feed setting of 5mm

and a feed rate of 0.045mm per blade.
The chips (Figure 17a) are large and
only slightly curved. Each chip represents one flank and part of the slot bottom. The second pass used an in-feed setting of 3mm and a feed rate of 0.28mm
per blade. This chip consists of the two
flank chips connected by the bottom chip
(Figure 17b). The finishing pass used
an in-feed of 1.00mm and a feed rate of
0.015mm per blade, and this chip has the
two flank and the bottom chip connected
to a U-shaped appearance.
Chips d through f in Figure 17 have
been created also with Alcrona-Pro coated carbide blades and 172m/min surface
speed in a three-pass dry cutting process
using the same in-feed values and feed
rates as applied in the wet cutting (Figure
17 a through c). The dry chips seem to
have the same appearance as the chips
from wet cutting except for the brown
and blue color from the process heat.
The comparison between the wet and
dry versions of power skiving with coated
carbide blades shows a clear advantage of
the dry process. The process heat helps
to plastically deform the chip during the
shearing action. If the process parameters and tool geometry are chosen to
move the process heat into the chips and
with the chips away from tool and work
piece, then a cool skiving process is the
result. Dry power skiving delivers a better
surface finish and causes equal or even
lesser tool wear than the wet process
version. However, the chip surface on
the side adjacent to the sheared off side is
smoother, and the machine power reading showed about 15 percent lower spindle power during dry skiving. The current skiving developments indicate the
dry process version will deliver the better tool life, which is expected to be more
significant than in bevel gear cutting.
Dry high-speed UCS power skiving with coated carbide blades result in
the optimal combination between low
tool wear and low skiving times. The
additional advantage is, that machines
with medium-speed, high-torque spindles (e.g., 1,000rpm max for machine
size 600mm OD) can be applied without compromising the performance of
the machine e.g. for bevel gears which
require low rpm and high torque. This
argument is important if a manufacturer
[www.geartechnology.com]

applies power skiving to bevel gear cutting machines.

The bottom row in Figure 17 shows
a dry UCS setup g, and it shows a
thermographic photo taken during the
roughing pass at mid-face. The highest temperatures of 107F (42C) occur
around the cutter and at the work gear
sections, which move away from the cut.
These temperatures can also be measured on part and cutter after the cycle.
It can be concluded that the dry UCS
process has an optimal heat transfer into
the chips and quickly reaches a rather low
and steady-state temperature of cutter
and work holding.
A productivity comparison between the
traditional processes hobbing and shaping with three variations of the new power
skiving process is shown (Fig. 18). The
goal of this chart is to compare the preferred embodiment of the different processes. In order to establish the same basis
for each process, an external ring gear
with the gear data shown in the diagram
was used for all processes. The objective
was a finishing quality with scallop or generating flat amplitudes at or below 5 m.
The shaping process used an AlCroNitecoated shaper cutter from G50 material
with 34 teeth and it was set up as a 3-cut
finishing cycle. The identical shaper cutter
was used for the wet power skiving where
the cutting was done in four passes. For
the hobbing process, a one-start hob with
16 gashes, also from AlCroNite-coated
G50 material, was utilized in a 2-cut cycle.
Dry power skiving with ALCRONAPro-coated H10F carbide blades is represented in the diagram as UCS-skiving
with 172m/min and as high-speed skiving with 300m/minboth set up as a
three-pass cycle. The dry power skiving bars are based on a 24-blade and 9"
diameter PentacPS cutter head. The chip
thickness in the case of UCS-skiving is 10
percent-to-20-percent higher than in the
case of high-speed skiving, which reduces
the productivity difference between the
two process variations, yet gives the UCSskiving a tool life advantage. Figure 18
indicates that power skiving has between
6-to-12 times the productivity of shaping
and between 1.6 and 3.3 times the productivity of hobbing.

Figure 18Productivity comparison.

Figure 19Measurement: profile, lead and spacing.

Measurement Results

This section discusses measurement

results from the newly developed UCS
power skiving with Pentac PS tools. As
mentioned earlier in this paper, corrections of the lead angle can be accomplished with machine motions and corrections of tooth thickness and depth
are possible within limits using machine
settings. Unlimited tooth thickness and

depth corrections, as well as pressure

angle corrections, are possible by regrinding the stick blades. The measurement results (Fig. 19) show profile (top)
and lead (bottom) measurement in the
left-side evaluation sheet. The measurement was taken after a pressure angle
correction on the skiving blades. The lead
direction showed a perfect result after the
first sample cutting. The waviness of the
January/February 2014|GEAR TECHNOLOGY

61

technical

Figure 20Measurement: surface roughness and waviness.

lead graph is typical for power skiving

and reflects the skiving scallops; however,
their amplitudes are below 5 m.
Surface roughness and waviness measurement results from a Zeiss surface
tracer are shown (Fig. 20). The profile
roughness results in the two graphs on
top of Figure 20 delivered excellent values
for Ra and Rz. The waviness in lead direction is basically the result of the scallop
amplitude of 5 m (theoretically). Due to
the different cutting condition on the two
flanks, the waviness on the right flank
shows about 1.5 times the magnitude of
the waviness of the left flank.
The right hand chart (Fig. 19) show
good results regarding fp and fu, considered the skiving scallops are phase-shifted from tooth to tooth. Cumulative pitch
error Fp and run-out Fr reflect the imperfect temporary workholding (Fig. 17g).
Improved gear quality can be achieved by
using production workholding or individual run-out truing in case of small
manufacturing quantities. Single and
adjacent tooth spacing numbers can be
improved by a lower feed rate, which will
reduce the tooth-to-tooth variation due
to the moving scallops.

62

GEAR TECHNOLOGY|January/February 2014

Summary

Complex solid skiving cutters lack some

flexibility for lower quantities and for
larger parts. Next to the solid cutter disks,
Gleason developed a second solution
that offers a high-speed dry power skiving based on peripheral cutter designs.
The new cutter system consists of three
different cutter sizes where each size is
available with different blade numbers.
Depending on the part size, this combination allows coverage of a range
between module two to module seven,
with five different cutter bodies; and the
stick blades can be ground on every modern blade grinding machine.
The power skiving process with stick
blade cutters is performed on 6-axis CNC
bevel gear cutting machines. Feed and
stroke motion are optimized in connection with the particular stick blade geometry in order to create an optimized chip
formation. All parameters for feed and
stroke are calculated in advance in order
to assure high cutting performance, even
tool wear and high tool life.
Lead correction, pressure angle balance and anti-twist correction can be
achieved via delta value input directly from the K- and lead-chart into the
technology software screen on the skiving machine. Although the perception in

the market is that power skiving seems

to compete only with shaping, and is
particularly suitable only for internal
gears, it can also be applied to external
gears and is also equaland perhaps
fasterthan hobbing.
In the case of a power skiving process
performed next to bevel gear cutting on
a Phoenix 6-axis machine, the conflict
of compromising the machines ability
for bevel gear power cutting with a highspeed spindle, which suits the high-speed
dry power skiving, was solved with the
development of under-critical-speed
(UCS) skiving. Power skiving with UCS
only requires 150 to 200m/min effective
surface speed, is highly productive, and
has excellent tool life.

References

1. Pittler von, W. Verfahren zum Schneiden von

Zahnrdern mittels eines zahnrad-artigen, an
den Stirnflchen der Zhne mit Schneidkanten
versehen-en Schneidwerkzeuges, Patent
Application, Germany, March, 1910.
2. Kobialka, C. Contemporary Gear PreMachining Solutions, AGMA No. 12FTM11,
October 2012, ISBN: 987-1-61481-042-1.
3. Stadtfeld, H.J. Optimal High-Speed Cutting of
Bevel Gears, Gleason Company Publication,
Rochester, New York, 2012.
4. Kreschel, J. Gleason Power Skiving: Technology
and Basics, Gleason Company Publication,
Ludwigsburg, Germany, 2012.

Hermann Stadtfeld

received in 1978 his B.S.

and in 1982 his M.S. in
mechanical engineering
at the Technical University
in Aachen, Germany. After
receiving his Doctorate he
worked as a scientist at
the Machine Tool Laboratory of the Technical
University of Aachen. In 1987 he accepted
the position as head of engineering and R&D
of the Bevel Gear Machine Tool Division of
Oerlikon Buehrle AG in Zurich, Switzerland.
In 1992 Dr. Stadtfeld accepted a position as
visiting professor at the Rochester Institute
of Technology. Since 1994, he has worked for
The Gleason Works in Rochester, New York,
first as director of R&D, and from 1996 as vice
president R&D. After an absence from Gleason
between 2002 to 2005, when he established a
gear research company in Germany and taught
in parallel gear technology as a professor
at the University of Ilmenau, he returned to
the Gleason Corporation where he holds
today the position of vice president, bevel
gear technology and R&D. Dr. Stadtfeld has
published more than 200 technical papers and
10 books on bevel gear technology. He holds
more than 50 international patents on gear
design, gear process and tools and machines.
[www.geartechnology.com]