1-Annurev - Ecolsys.29.1 Early Evolution of Land

P1: ARK/ary P2: ARK
September 28, 1998 10:15 Annual Reviews AR067-10
Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1998. 29:263–92

Copyright °c 1998 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved
EARLY EVOLUTION OF LAND

PLANTS: Phylogeny, Physiology,
and Ecology of the Primary
Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1998.29:263-292. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org
by Universidad Nacional de Colombia-sede Medellin on 05/02/07. For personal use only.
Terrestrial Radiation
Richard M. Bateman,1 Peter R. Crane,2 William A. DiMichele,3
Paul R. Kenrick,4 Nick P. Rowe,5 Thomas Speck,6
and William E. Stein7
1Royal Botanic Garden, 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, United Kingdom;
e-mail: r.bateman@rbge.org.uk; 2Department of Geology, The Field Museum,
Chicago, Illinois 60605-2496; 3Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of
Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560; 4Department of
Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom;
5Laboratoire de Paléobotanique, Institut des Sciences de l’Evolution (UMR 5554
CNRS), Université de Montpellier II, 34095 Montpellier cedex 05, France;

6Botanischer Garten der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, D79104 Freiburg, Germany;
7Department of Biological Sciences, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York
13902-6000
KEY WORDS: biomechanics, cladistics, evolutionary radiation, novelty radiation, paleobotany,

systematics
ABSTRACT
The Siluro-Devonian primary radiation of land biotas is the terrestrial equiva-
lent of the much-debated Cambrian “explosion” of marine faunas. Both show
the hallmarks of novelty radiations (phenotypic diversity increases much more
rapidly than species diversity across an ecologically undersaturated and thus
low-competition landscape), and both ended with the formation of evolutionary
and ecological frameworks analogous to those of modern ecosystems. Profound
improvements in understanding early land plant evolution reflect recent libera-
tions from several research constraints: Cladistic techniques plus DNA sequence
data from extant relatives have prompted revolutionary reinterpretations of land
plant phylogeny, and thus of systematics and character-state acquisition patterns.
Biomechanical and physiological experimental techniques developed for extant
263
0066-4162/98/1120-0263$08.00
P1: ARK/ary P2: ARK
264 BATEMAN ET AL
plants have been extrapolated to fossil species, with interpretations both aided
and complicated by the recent knowledge that global landmass positions, cur-
rents, climates, and atmospheric compositions have been profoundly variable
(and thus nonuniformitarian) through the Phanerozoic. Combining phylogenetic
and paleoecological data offers potential insights into the identity and function of
key innovations, though current evidence suggests the importance of accumulat-
ing within lineages a critical mass of phenotypic character. Challenges to further
progress include the lack of sequence data and paucity of phenotypic features
among the early land plant clades, and a fossil record still inadequate to date
accurately certain crucial evolutionary and ecological events.
INTRODUCTION
Within paleobotany, there are few more popular review topics than the origin
and initial radiation of vascular land plants in the Silurian (438–410 mya) and
Devonian (410–355 mya) periods (20, 21, 23, 25, 34, 37, 39, 40, 51, 56, 57, 66,
67, 70, 95, 97, 132). Fortunately, each crop of reviews is separated by remark-
able empirical and conceptual advances in a wide range of fields that amply
justify frequent reappraisals.
Recent Advances
Any uniformitarian views of the Earth’s environment that have survived the
paradigm shift of plate tectonics and continental drift have since been under-
mined by evidence of dramatic changes in global climate and atmospheric com-
position through the Phanerozoic. Thus, paleoecologists must now deal with
profound changes in the environmental theater as well as the evolutionary play.
During the Siluro-Devonian there was a strong concentration of land masses in
the Southern Hemisphere, with only North America, northern Europe, and parts
of China straddling the equator (115). Consequently, both atmospheric and
oceanic currents contrasted starkly with modern patterns. Atmospheric CO2
levels were falling precipitously and O2 levels rising rapidly; both phenomena,
driven at least in part by the “greening”of the continents, had profound implica-
tions for the physiological competence of land plants (3, 13, 14, 44, 80, 85, 97).
Building on earlier intuitive advances (5), the systematics of early land plants
has been revolutionized by the integration of morphological data from living
and fossil species to generate cladistic phylogenies (50, 64–66). These not
only define putative monophyletic (and thus natural) groups of species but also
elucidate the sequence of acquisition of features and functions within specific
lineages (9, 75). Molecular phylogenies of extant species have further clarified
evolutionary relationships and tested the supposed primitive nature of some
“living fossils” (9, 139).
P1: ARK/ary P2: ARK
EARLY LAND PLANTS 265
Reexamination of exceptionally preserved biotas, notably the Rhynie Chert

(64, 98, 99), has elucidated the novel life histories of several early land plants as
well as revealed abundant interspecific interactions within their communities.
Biomechanical and physiological models erected around extant plant species
have been extrapolated onto fossils, often with surprising results (12, 87, 96, 97,
122).
Advances in understanding the genetic underpinnings of major phenotypic
changes of extant plants (2, 22) offer deeper understanding of the nature of
speciation in general and radiations in particular (54). Plants are viewed in-
creasingly as evolutionary models in their own right, rather than religiously

shoe-horned into pre-existing theories built around higher animals (11). The
resulting insights permit fresh comparisons between radiations on land and
those in marine environments (cf. 25, 55).
Radiations in general are being defined more precisely and categorized use-
fully according to pattern of diversification and inferred causal mechanisms
(10, 45, 138). More specifically, attempts are being made to tease apart the
supposedly explosive Siluro-Devonian terrestrial radiation into a better-defined
nested set of evolutionary bursts (40, 66, 67).
Four Phases of Plant Evolution

Bateman (7) attempted to simultaneously categorize and interpret ca. 1800
million years of plant evolution as four successive phases.
1. The Biochemical Phase characterized the extensive history of life prior to

the Ordovician (510–438 mya; 97, 113). During this period, fundamental
biochemical pathways such as those facilitating respiration and photosyn-
thesis were established in anatomically simple cyanobacteria and algae that
primarily occupied aqueous environments. Also, more sophisticated life
histories followed the advent of meiosis.
2. The Anatomical Phase spanned the Ordovician and Silurian. Erstwhile pio-
neering land plants struggled with the physical and physiological problems
posed by a terrestrial existence, challenged more by the hostile environ-
ment than by competition with one another. Most of the tissue types that
characterize modern land plants evolved, together with the alternation be-
tween independent sporophytic and gametophytic generations that defines
the pteridophytic life history.
Focusing more directly on the fossil evidence, Edwards & Selden (40)
recognized phases corresponding largely to those of Bateman, but they ef-
fectively subdivided his anatomical phase into an Upper Ordovician-Silurian
(quasi)bryophytic phase (Phase 2a) and a later Silurian rhyniophytic phase
P1: ARK/ary P2: ARK
266 BATEMAN ET AL
(Phase 2b). These broadly correspond to the liverwort-dominated “eoem-

bryophytic” and explosive “eotracheophytic” phases, respectively, of Gray
(57; see also 67).
3. The Morphological Phase of Bateman (“eutracheophytic” phase sensu 57)

reached an acme in the Devonian. Fully terrestrialized land plants experi-
mented with various arrangements of tissue types, apparently engendering
morphological and architectural escalation. This greatly increased the range
and maximum complexity of gross morphological form as well as maximum
body sizes; species of several clades adapted to exploit the third dimension
far more effectively.
4. The Behavioral Phase increased exponentially through the Carboniferous

and Permian, building on the previous evolutionary phases and establishing
the ecosystem dynamics that continue to control modern vegetation. In par-
ticular, interactions between individual plants and their abiotic environment
were increasingly supplemented with biotic interactions among individuals,
which facilitated coevolution with mycorrhizal and pathogenic fungi, and
with animal pollinators, dispersers, and herbivores.
This review concerns primarily the intermediate anatomical and morpho-

logical phases, which conveniently present the strongest evidence in the fossil
record. Phase 1—the presumed earlier transition to land of prokaryotic and
simple eukaryotic oxygen producers and fungi—is taken as an essential precur-
sor to the embryophytic life history and subsequent vascularization (40, 66, 97).
The well-integrated, mainly seed plant–dominated communities of Phase 4 (25)
are deemed too modern in aspect to merit discussion here; their phylogeny is
reviewed elsewhere in this volume (28).
In this chapter we examine the anatomical and morphological phases of
terrestrialization by reviewing recent advances in land plant phylogeny, physio-
logy–biomechanics, and ecology. We then attempt to draw together the patterns
evident in these disparate sources of data to infer potential processes underlying
this most profound of all terrestrial radiations.
LAND PLANT PHYLOGENY

First we summarize present evidence for land plant phylogeny, beginning with
the presumed Mid-Ordovician colonization of the land and ending with the
Late Devonian origin of the seed plants; examples of these taxa are described
in greater detail in recent paleobotany texts (131, 136). This section focuses
on the relationships of higher taxa (primarily classes and orders) and uses a
novel informal nomenclature to describe some recently delimited monophyletic
P1: ARK/ary P2: ARK
groups (66). Selected character-state transitions between potentially pivotal

groups are elucidated in subsequent sections.
Phylogenetic studies based on comparative morphology (32, 56, 84) and
molecular genetics (73, 78, 79, 81) provide compelling evidence for a close re-
lationship between land plants and green algae, specifically the Charophyceae.
Living Charophyceae are a small group of predominantly freshwater plants
comprising simple unicellular and filamentous species (e.g. Klebsormidiales
and Zygnematales), as well as highly differentiated forms (e.g. Charales) that
include some of the most complex green algae (56). Charophyceae are a pa-
raphyletic group, but the identity of the living land plant sister group remains
unresolved. The most likely sister taxa to land plants are Coleochaetales (ca. 15
living species), Charales (ca. 400 living species), or a clade containing both.
The fossil record of charophycean algae is relatively poor, and the earliest
evidence post-dates that of land plants (67). Fossils are limited mostly to decay-
resistant or calcified parts of the life cycle, and only two groups (Charales,
Zygnematales) are well represented. The earliest and most abundant charo-
phycean algae are Charales (46), which first appear in the fossil record in the
Late Silurian but probably had a considerably earlier origin, given that early
fossils have well-developed and highly distinctive gametangia that resemble
those of modern forms. The appearance of Charales in the fossil record may
be linked to the evolution of calcification in the more derived members of this
group. Zygnematales occur more rarely in the fossil record (58), and the group
is first recognized in the Middle Devonian. The phylogenetically important
Coleochaetales have not been recognized unequivocally in the fossil record.
Some cuticular compressions in the Lower Devonian (notably Parka) resemble
the delicate, filamentous thalli of living Coleochaete orbicularis, though other
aspects of their morphology are inconsistent with this interpretation (cf. 61, 86).
Land Plants
Monophyly of land plants is strongly supported by comparative morphology
(16, 32, 56, 66, 84) and nucleic acid sequences (62, 72, 73). Although relation-
ships among the major basal living groups remain uncertain (4, 9, 32, 48, 56, 59,
66, 84), the hypothesis currently supported by the broadest range of data resolves
“bryophytes” as paraphyletic, with liverworts basal in land plants and either
mosses or hornworts as the living sister group to vascular plants. Liverworts
themselves may be paraphyletic to other land plants, with marchantialeans basal
and jungermannialeans more closely related to hornworts, mosses, or vascular
plants (4, 15).
An alternative hypothesis, suggested by 18S rRNA sequences, places horn-
worts as basal and a liverwort-moss clade as sister group to vascular plants (59).
Less parsimonious hypotheses recognize bryophyte monophyly and either a
P1: ARK/ary P2: ARK
268 BATEMAN ET AL
sister group relationship with vascular plants (66) or an origin from within
basal vascular plants (32, 48, 62, 132). Phylogenetic evidence suggests that
“bryophytes”1 in general, and liverwort-like plants in particular, should have
been important components of early terrestrial floras (67).
Evidence from fossil spores indicates that land plants originated in the mid-
Ordovician and that the divergence of the four major living clades (liverworts,
hornworts, mosses, vascular plants) may have occurred during the Late Ordovi-
cian and Silurian (52, 57); this hypothesis is consistent with phylogenetic data
that resolve “bryophytes” as a basal grade within land plants. In contrast, the
megafossil record documents a Late Silurian origin and Early Devonian diver-
sification of vascular plants and a much later origin of “bryophytes.” Kenrick
& Crane (66, 67) argued that the spore record provides a more accurate picture
of the time of origin and pattern of early diversification of land plants than the
megafossil record because spores are more numerous and less influenced by
taphonomic biases. They suggested that the late appearance of “bryophytic”
megafossils probably reflects the combined effects of under-representation of
this group in the fossil record and also the difficulties of recognizing early plants
at the “bryophyte” grade that may have lacked the distinctive features of living
groups.
However, the late appearance also offers comfort to a minority of phylo-
geneticists who view as credible scenarios of “bryophyte” origins via sporo-
phytic reduction from isomorphic “pretracheophytes” (9), particularly if the
Ordovician supposed bryophytic spores, cuticular sheets of cells, and tubes of
nematophytes were in fact derived from free-living or lichenized fungi (128).
Liverworts
The most inclusive phylogenetic studies of liverworts resolve a jungermanni-
alean (Metzgeriales, Jungermanniales, Calobryales) clade (4, 15, 83), a pattern
consistent with traditional systematic treatments (114). Morphological studies
indicate that Metzgeriales are paraphyletic to Jungermanniales (83), and this
hypothesis has some support from 18S rRNA sequences (19). Recent mole-
cular and morphological analyses also support monophyly of marchantialean
liverworts (Sphaerocarpales, Marchantiales, Monocleales; 15). Within mar-
chantialeans, the enigmatic Monocleales (two species) are nested within Mar-
chantiales, and Sphaerocarpales are probably sister group to a Marchantiales–
Monocleales clade.
Despite widespread support for an early origin of liverworts from phyloge-
netic studies, the group has a poor fossil record. Some of the earliest land
plant spores possess features that are consistent with a sphaerocarpalean affinity
1 This use of quotes is a convention in phylogenetics for identifying taxa as paraphyletic grades
rather than monophyletic clades.

P1: ARK/ary P2: ARK
(57, 137), but there are insufficient characters to substantiate an unequivocal af-
filiation with liverworts. Many early spores could also belong to extinct taxa
in the stem groups of land plants or major basal land plant clades. Most Paleo-
zoic megafossils are related to Metzgeriales, including the earliest unequivocal
liverwort (Upper Devonian). The precise relationships of earlier liverwort-like
megafossils (38, 49) require further clarification. Jungermanniales first appear
in the Mesozoic, and there are only a handful of well-substantiated Jurassic and
Cretaceous records. Sphaerocarpales are first documented in the Triassic, and
Marchantiales are clearly present in the Mid–Late Triassic.
Hornworts
Hornworts are a small, divergent group of land plants comprising ca. 400 liv-
ing species. Monophyly of hornworts is well supported and uncontroversial
(32, 83, 84), though generic limits and relationships among genera are poorly
resolved. Notothylas may be sister group to an Anthoceros–Dendroceros–
Megaceros–Phaeoceros clade (83), though a marginally less parsimonious al-
ternative solution interprets the small, simple sporophytes of Notothylas as
derived, and taxa with larger sporophytes such as Dendroceros and Megaceros
as basal in the group. The fossil record of hornworts is poor and has not yet
contributed important information to cladistic studies of this group.
Mosses
Monophyly of mosses has broad support in recent phylogenetic studies (15, 59,
60, 82). Within mosses, Sphagnales and Andreaeales are consistently resolved
as basal groups. Molecular data support two major clades of peristomate mosses:
(a) a nematodontous clade comprising Buxbaumiales, Tetraphidales, Poly-
trichales, and perhaps Andreaeales and (b) an arthrodontous clade containing
Bryales (59, 60). New morphological data on sporophytes and gametogene-
sis in Takakia provide compelling evidence for an affinity with basal mosses
(Andreaeales, Sphagnales), rather than with liverworts (Calobryales), as previ-
ously hypothesized (32, 48, 101); this relationship is also supported by similar-
ities in 18S rRNA sequences (59).
Mosses have a poor Paleozoic and Mesozoic megafossil record. Arthrodon-
tous groups such as Dicranales, Pottiales, Funariales, Leucodontales, and Hyp-
nales have been documented in the Late Permian and Early Triassic (118).
Sphagnales are also known from the Late Permian (Protosphagnum). Putative
Polytrichales have been reported from the Carboniferous, but the first unequiv-
ocal record is from the Late Cretaceous (71). The earliest megafossils of possi-
ble moss affinity include Sporogonites (Lower Devonian) and Muscites (Lower
Carboniferous), though the latter is more likely to be a lycopsid (NP Rowe,
unpublished data).
P1: ARK/ary P2: ARK
270 BATEMAN ET AL
Vascular Plants
Monophyly of vascular plants is supported by comparative morphology (66,
130) and by data from 18S rRNA (72) and 16S rDNA sequences (77). The in-
clusion of fossils results in the recognition of several additional clades that can-
not be discriminated among living taxa alone. Phylogenetic analyses (65, 66)
interpolate two Early Devonian Rhynie Chert plants, Aglaophyton and Horneo-
phyton, as paraphyletic between “bryophytes” and basal vascular plants because
they possess some features unique to vascular plants sensu lato (e.g. branched,
nutritionally independent sporophyte) but also retain several plesiomorphic,
bryophyte-like characteristics (e.g. terminal sporangia, columella in Horneo-

phyton, and the absence of leaves, roots, and tracheids with well-defined
thickenings).
The discovery of previously unrecognized diversity in extinct Cooksonia
and similar early fossils (e.g. Tortilicaulis, Uskiella, Caia; 38) also suggests
that simple early land plants—once grouped as rhyniophytes (5)—are not a
monophyletic assemblage (66). Rhynia and a few related fossils (Taeniocrada,
Stockmansella) form a small but distinctive clade in the vascular plant stem
group (rhyniopsids; 65, 66). Some Cooksonia species may be among the pa-
raphyletic precursors of vascular plants (“protracheophytes”), whereas others
are true vascular plants apparently allied to the clubmoss lineage. The eutra-
cheophyte clade (vascular plant crown group) contains all living and most fossil
vascular plants.
Lycophytes
The Lycophytina constitutes a distinctive basal clade within eutracheophytes
(16, 62, 66, 72, 107). Monophyly of lycophytes has broad support from compar-
ative morphology (66, 130) and molecular studies (72, 76, 139). Within lyco-
phytes, the extinct, leafless zosterophylls are resolved as a basal grade. Derived
zosterophylls with marked bilateral symmetry of their axes form the clade Zos-
terophyllopsida (66). Within the sister group of leafy lycopsids, there is strong
support for monophyly of the ligulate and heterosporous clades (66, 76, 139).
Also, Isoetaceae constitutes clearly the most closely related living group to the
far more diverse arborescent lycopsids of the Late Paleozoic.
Small herbaceous lycophytes (Zosterophyllopsida, Drepanophycaceae) are
among the earliest recognizable land plant megafossils, and the group was a
prominent component of Early Devonian floras. Several major clades evolved
during the Devonian, including the three living groups: Lycopodiaceae, Se-
laginellaceae, and Isoetaceae. All living lycopsids are herbaceous or pseudo-
herbaceous, but substantial trees evolved within Isoetales sensu lato during the
Late Devonian (8). These arboreous species dominated tropical lowland coastal
swamps during the Carboniferous.
P1: ARK/ary P2: ARK
Euphyllophytes
In eutracheophytes, monophyly of a euphyllophyte clade comprising living
horsetails, ferns, and seed plants has broad support (28, 29, 62, 66, 72, 94, 107,
130), whereas the widely recognized “trimerophytes” are viewed as para-
phyletic or polyphyletic. Some conflicting molecular data sets place elements
of lycopsids within euphyllophytes (77) or resolve lycopsids as sister group
to seed plants (76), but internal consistency of the data is low and neither
hypothesis is supported by comparative morphology. The euphyllophyte stem
group contains early fossils such as the “trimerophytes” Psilophyton and Pertica
(66).
Within euphyllophytes there is strong support for monophyly of lepto-
sporangiate ferns (93), lignophytes (paraphyletic “progymnosperms” plus
monophyletic seed plants), and seed plants (72, 76, 109, 130), as well as for
a horsetail clade comprising living Equisetum plus extinct Calamites and Ar-
chaeocalamites (129). Relationships among these groups and other smaller
living taxa (Ophioglossales, Marattiales, Psilotales) and extinct taxa (Cladoxy-
lales, Zygopteridales, Iridopteridales, Stauropteridales) remain highly ambigu-
ous. For morphological data, one hypothesis views ferns sensu lato as mono-
phyletic. The basal dichotomy in ferns is between a clade containing living
eusporangiate ferns plus Filicales (fern crown-group) and a clade comprising
Upper Devonian–Lower Carboniferous fernlike fossils of the Cladoxylales, Zy-
gopteridales, and Stauropteridales (106). An alternative hypothesis shows ferns
as paraphyletic to seed plants. Certain fernlike fossils, and possibly also living
eusporangiate ferns, are depicted as more closely related to seed plants than to
leptosporangiate ferns (107, 130).
PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOMECHANICS

Bryophytes
Mechanical constraints on early land plants were probably negligible, given
their small body size, limited height, and presumed prostrate (thalloid) organi-
zation. Biophysical constraints were governed primarily by direct exposure to
the atmosphere, prompting the acquisition of outer envelopes to restrict dehy-
dration of the plant body (cuticle) and spores (sporopollenin) (87, 90, 95–97,
124). If the earliest terrestrial embryophytes morphologically resembled extant
liverworts and hornworts, growth forms probably included relatively thin, dor-
siventrally organized thalloid structures lacking specialized conducting or sup-
portive tissues. Despite several reports of thalloid organisms in pre-Devonian
sediments (36, 136), their status as embryophytes remains equivocal as a result
of limited preservation.
P1: ARK/ary P2: ARK
272 BATEMAN ET AL
Possibly the earliest upright cylindrical structures among embryophytes were

erect gametophores embedded in thalloid structures. Because the cylindrical
structures lacked specialized vascular tissues or hypodermal steromes, the di-
ameter and height of such columns would have been severely restricted by
potential conductance (105) and relied on turgor pressure to maintain an up-
right stance. The height of female sporophyte-bearing gametophores may have
conferred greater dispersal potential than that possessed by forms sporulating
directly from the thallus surface, allowing spores to reach uncolonized areas
beyond the dense, extensive clonal mat.
Extant mosses reflect a transition from a thalloid to an axial growth form

bearing leaflike appendages. Although some gametophyte axes show tissue
differentiation into conducting cells (hydroids and leptoids), small axial diam-
eters conferred considerable mechanical constraints. Nevertheless, such forms
would have exceeded the height and vertical complexity of thalloid communi-
ties, in addition to developing photosynthetic leaflike appendages that were in
some species connected to the water-conducting strand. In many extant moss
species, dispersal of spores is effected by an elongate sporophyte seta that re-
leases the spores slightly above the gametophyte layer. If such morphologies
existed among “bryophytic” early land plants, the tiny columns constituting
gametophyte axes and sporophytic setae represent mechanical innovations for
trapping light and elevating the height of release of spores into the air (87, 90).
The largely cylindrical design of such structures shows the earliest evidence of
plant organs adapted to resisting bending forces in all lateral directions.
“Protracheophytes” and Rhyniopsids

Anatomically preserved early vascular plants, notably from the Rhynie Chert,
provide sufficient anatomical information (cf. 35, 100) to construct accurate
models of the biomechanical properties and growth forms of fossil plant stems
(121–123). Prerequisites for such studies are reliable data on the distribution
of contrasting tissues in axial transverse sections and well-preserved cell walls
for comparison with those few living plant tissues already subjected to detailed
biomechanical investigation (for methods see 120–123).
In the “protracheophytes” Aglaophyton major and Horneophyton lignieri,
the flexural stiffness of upright axes and rhizomes was achieved by the main-
tenance of turgor pressure. The central conducting strands of such stems gave
insignificant support, whereas the combined inner and outer cortex provided
98% of stem flexural stiffness in Aglaophyton. Quantitative estimates (12, 13)
indicate that Aglaophyton could have reached a height of 19–33 cm before
failing mechanically, compared with previous estimates of ca. 20 cm (42) and
50–60 cm (68). In Horneophyton, the parenchymatous cortex would have pro-
vided 98% of the flexural stiffness in stems possessing extrapolated maximum
heights of 12–20 cm.
P1: ARK/ary P2: ARK
Both plants relied on the maintenance of turgor to retain an upright posture.

Sculptured and banded cylindrical elements comprising the central conducting
strand probably emulated true xylem tissue in facilitating water transport and
thus maintaining the turgor pressure of the entire axis. However, these elements
were positioned too centrally in the axis to be of direct mechanical significance,
and the thickened and banded walls of the elements were more mechanically
suited to withstanding collapse by internal negative pressures of the lumen than
increasing the stiffness of the tissue.
Among rhyniopsids, biomechanical models of Rhynia gwynne-vaughanii
indicate that the stele of derived, S-type tracheids (65) similarly offers little
direct contribution to flexural stiffness. The stem could have reached a maxi-
mum height of 13–22 cm without mechanical failure, supported largely by the
parenchymatous cortex [99% of the stem flexural stiffness (123)]. In none of
the rhyniopsids tested does the stele contribute significantly to flexural stiffness
of the stem. The phylogenetically heterogeneous fossils assigned to Cooksonia
(e.g. Cooksonia pertonii) are also turgor systems, although those showing dif-
ferentiation of an outer hypodermal sterome may be predominantly supported
by this tissue. The banded tracheid elements that characterize the earliest tra-
cheophytes, like those of “protracheophytes,” would not have been suitable for
mechanical support against bending forces, though they were better designed
for resisting internal negative pressures and facilitating maintenance of turgor
pressure.
In summary, the earliest land plant axes tested indicate that upright axes of
protracheophytes and rhyniopsids were dependent on a maintained turgor pres-
sure to remain upright and to prevent wilting. This must have represented an
important constraint on stem height and on the ability to support both termi-
nal and lateral appendages (i.e. end-loads and branches). The appearance of
conducting tissues represented a marked physiological and mechanical innova-
tion for maintaining turgor pressure. It made possible a self-supporting axial
growth habit that could far exceed in height the light-trapping and spore dis-
persal capabilities observed among thalloid gametophores and smaller-bodied
bryophytic gametophytes and sporophytes. Despite these innovations, early
terrestrial plants with turgor-stabilized axes would have been confined to habi-
tats with a continuous and sufficient water supply that provided relatively high
humidity (100).
Eutracheophytes
Mechanical investigations of “zosterophylls” sensu lato and basal lycopsids
reveal few further innovations for improving axial mechanical stability. The
turgescent cortex represented the predominant tissue contributing to the flex-
ural stiffness of the stem in the lycopsids Asteroxylon mackiei (>95%) and
Drepanophycus spinaeformis (84–98%), and a similar figure is calculated for
P1: ARK/ary P2: ARK
274 BATEMAN ET AL
those primitive species of Zosterophyllum that lack hypodermal steromes (121,

123). In both lycopsid species, the lobed steles probably exerted little influence
in direct mechanical support with likely values of 2–5%, and in Drepanophy-
cus, maximum calculated values of up to only 16% toward flexural stiffness of
the whole stem (87, 88, 105, 123).
During early terrestrialization, columnar growth forms reliant on mainte-
nance of turgor pressure probably saturated habitats with unlimited water avail-
ability. The potential complexity of growth forms and communities would have
been severely constrained to sparsely branched forms no higher than 1 m. Fur-
ther morphological innovations would have been necessary to colonize water-

limited habitats. We hypothesize that this next step in terrestrial colonization
also involved lineages possessing turgor-stabilized upright stems. The high se-
lective pressures needed to maintain high turgor pressures under even temporary
water stress eventually drove the evolution of more complex and effective root
systems for water uptake as well as an increase in cutinization of the epidermis
and cell wall thickening of subepidermal tissues for reducing water loss via
transpiration. The evolution of subepidermal layers in response to selective
pressure for colonizing areas with temporary water stress was also a fortuitous
preaptation for mechanical stability.
The appearance of a hypodermal sterome in zosterophylls probably marks the
first mechanical innovation away from support based mostly on maintenance
of turgor pressure. The production, and modulation during growth, of a ring
of cortical fibers in an otherwise parenchymatous cortex would have permitted
a wider range of mechanically viable structures and generated diverse small-
bodied growth habits analogous to those of extant herbaceous lycopsids (110).
In the primitive “trimerophyte” Psilophyton dawsonii, the hypodermal ster-
ome of collenchymatous-sclerenchymatous elements contributes significantly
to the flexural stiffness of the entire stem (values of 96–99% result from calcu-
lations inputting either collenchyma or sclerenchyma as the outer tissue of the
biomechanical model) (123). The predicted maximum height for a stem of
P. dawsonii of basal stem diameter 6 mm is 75–200 cm, with the central steles
contributing little to the flexural stiffness of the stems (<5%). Stems of the
derived (sawdonialean) zosterophyll Gosslingia breconensis (basal diameter
4 mm) yield critical buckling lengths of 51–140 cm, depending on the tissue
type employed in the model to represent the newly acquired hypodermal
sterome (over 96% when modeled as collenchyma and over 99% when mode-
led as sclerenchyma) (123). Similar values characterize derived Zosterophyllum
species possessing hypodermal steromes (123).
Among the Devonian plants analyzed, perhaps the earliest empirical evidence
of a significant contribution to flexural stiffness from xylem tissue is observed in
the protolepidodendralean lycopsid Leclercqia complexa. Modeling the outer
sterome as collenchymatous tissue yielded a critical buckling height of 85–142
P1: ARK/ary P2: ARK
cm (basal diameter 7 mm) (123). However, the contribution toward flexural

stiffness of the xylem was still only 42%, compared with 56% from the col-
lenchymatous hypodermal sterome.
Thus, prior to the appearance of extensive woody cylinders and periderm,
mechanical stability among early land plants shifted from organizations re-
lying on turgor systems to those employing hypodermal steromes. As well
as affording the possibility of greater height, cylinders of collenchymatous or
sclerenchymatous tissues were almost certainly important for supporting in-
creasingly complex branch systems. Larger evapotranspiration surfaces would
have required yet more efficient water conductance than was supplied by the
primary steles in small-bodied early land plants. This may partially explain the
relatively larger and mechanically more significant steles observed in Leclerc-
qia and similar taxa.
Lignophytes
The appearance of secondary growth in the Middle Devonian, following the
initial phase of land plant evolution, influenced water conductance, canopy for-
mation, and mechanical support, and also prompted diversification in growth
forms. The appearance of secondary xylem in eutracheophytes was probably
linked to the water supply of megaphylls and selection for enlarging canopy sur-
faces, mechanically supported by hypodermal steromes. Biomechanical analy-
ses indicate that secondary xylem in some early seed plants (and probably many
early lignophytes) did not provide significant mechanical support; for example,
the outer sparganum cortex in Calamopitys contributed over 85% to flexural
stiffness of the stem and was essential for supporting the large megaphyllous
leaves (111). Secondary xylem was confined within the primary body of the
stem in many aneurophyte “progymnosperms” and basal seed plants, offering
little mechanical strength but probably enhancing water conduction. Signif-
icant mechanical contributions from secondary xylem, such as that observed
among archaeopteridalean “progymnosperms,” were possible only following
additional developmental innovations; the most notable was periderm forma-
tion, which permitted the wood cylinder to exceed the limits of the primary
body of the stem (119).
PALEOECOLOGY
The evolution of ecological patterns during the Devonian parallels the appear-
ance of morphological and phylogenetic structure and diversity. The Devonian
record suggests a steady increase in ecological complexity at all spatial scales,
from an alien simplicity at the beginning to nearly modern organization by the
onset of the Carboniferous (25). Early Devonian ecosystems were composed
of structurally simple plants with dynamically simple interactions (39). The
P1: ARK/ary P2: ARK
276 BATEMAN ET AL
differences in dynamics at local and landscape scales were slight and difficult
to differentiate. By the end of the Devonian, landscapes were varied and local
assemblages of plants were structurally complex, with much greater diversity
of body plans, life histories, and survival strategies (112).
Early and Middle Devonian

Studies of Early Devonian landscapes (34, 39, 63) indicate that supposed com-
munities consisted of patches of opportunistic clonal plants. Given that typical
coeval plants were characterized by rhizoids or rudimentary true roots, were
supported by turgor pressure, and showed homosporous life histories, most vas-
cular plants were probably constrained to wetter parts of the landscape. Within
these humid habitats there may have been more niche partitioning than gener-
ally supposed. Recent work on paleosols (63) implies that vascular plants had
gained the capacity to colonize some habitats with seasonal moisture availabil-
ity, pointing to the evolution of physiological drought tolerance. Furthermore,
the recognition of probable roots in weakly developed paleosols of streamside
environments (44) indicates that some groups of Early Devonian plants may
have been more complex morphologically than previously believed, having the
ability to tap into deeper sources of groundwater.
The Rhynie Chert flora, now one of the best-understood floras of the entire
Paleozoic, offers a remarkable window into an Early Devonian ecosystem. Al-
though sporophyte architecture was simple, many sporophyte ecological strate-
gies clearly coexisted, such as the ability of Rhynia gwynne-vaughanii to spread
rapidly over a substrate via deciduous lateral branches (41). Sporophyte diversi-
fication was matched by a wide array of gametophyte morphologies that record
many variations on aids to syngamy (64, 98), and fungi played a “modern”
spectrum of roles in the ecosystem (133, 135). Unfortunately, the supposedly
archetypal Rhynie Chert flora appears to be an unusual assemblage specialized
for life in a low-pH, periodically flooded habitat (9); the flora may have included
species secondarily reduced for aquatic life habits. The Chert thus allows only
a small and potentially relictual perspective on the ecology of this crucial time.
Recent paleosol studies revealed evidence for prototype “forests” as early as
the Middle Devonian from waterlogged soils of New York State (31) and even
in well-drained habitats from Antarctica (103). Lowland wetland macrofossil
assemblages also demonstrate increasing plant-animal interactions; the evolu-
tion of terrestrial arthropods was proceeding rapidly and may have included
herbivory (74, 117).
Late Devonian
The evolution of community and landscape complexity escalated dramatically
during the Late Devonian. Empirical studies of the relationship between
P1: ARK/ary P2: ARK
megafloras and environments of deposition (17, 112) have revealed the ini-
tial phases of landscape partitioning by the major plant clades. Floras typi-
cal of swamps that were dominated by the fernlike plant Rhacophyton, and
periswamp areas that included lycopsids, were distinct from floras of interfluves
and drier parts of flood plains, dominated by the arboreous “progymnosperm”
Archaeopteris. Seed-bearing “pteridosperms” appear to have originated in
wetter parts of the landscape but then spread as opportunists into areas of
disturbance and physical stress, including relatively arid habitats (108).
Pioneering studies using paleosols to resolve vegetational patterns across
Late Devonian landscapes (17, 102) revealed a range of conditions on vegetated

floodplains, from fully saturated to well drained and apparently dry. More
recent investigations of in situ tree stumps and root casts in Late Devonian
paleosols (31) indicated growth of Archaeopteris trees in seasonally wet but
well-drained habitats. They further suggested that limited evidence of tree
growth in the drier parts of floodplains may reflect both biological and physical
processes that remove critical paleosol evidence rather than the absence of open
forests. The development of rooting, and the evolution of forests and complex
landscapes, apparently played a major role in determining global climatic and
geochemical balances (3, 13, 44, 97).
Clearly, ecological and evolutionary changes were strongly linked and in-
cluded both positive and negative feedback systems. The simple systems that
characterized the Early and Middle Devonian apparently offered low resis-
tance to invasion by species possessing major evolutionary innovations (25).
Chaloner & Sheerin (21) documented the origin of nearly all major tissue and
organ types during the Devonian, yet studies of Devono-Carboniferous plant
biomechanics (87, 90, 119, 121, 122) indicate that the early plants were far from
the biomechanical optima permitted by their tissues and organs (69). Studies of
the developmental controls on Devonian plants (127) similarly suggest to some
of us that initial increases in the complexity of development created many op-
portunities for morphological diversification with relatively few constraints.
Maximum plant stature increased in many clades, along with the average diver-
sity of organ types borne by any single species and the frequency of compound
reproductive structures (70). Yet DiMichele et al (26) argued that the rate of
increase in diversity of body plans slowed during the Late Devonian, as those
architectures that characterize modern taxonomic classes and orders became
clearly recognizable.
The Late Devonian encapsulated all the major body plans of vascular plants,
each characterizing one of the major “modern” clades: seed plants, ferns,
sphenopsids, and several groups of lycopsids (the lack of high-level innova-
tion subsequent to the Early Carboniferous, with the arguable exception of the
rise of the angiosperms, presumably reflects intensifying morphological and
P1: ARK/ary P2: ARK
278 BATEMAN ET AL
ecological constraints). Available (albeit limited) evidence indicates that each

major lineage of plants had established a distinct ecological centroid by the
Early Carboniferous (24, 26) and that together they had occupied a wide range
of terrestrial habitats (31, 103). The result was the development of strong incum-
bency effects, or “home-field advantage” (see 53, 92, 104), whereby ecological
resource occupation suppresses the likelihood of survival of new variants (138).
CHARACTERS AND PHYLOGENY

RECONSTRUCTION
Strengths of the Phylogenetic Framework
Cladogram topology determines the relationships of higher taxa (and hence
their delimitation into monophyletic groups) and the relative (but not absolute)
timings of the speciation events that correspond to the lineage divergences. But
more importantly, a rooted cladogram also provides an explicit evolutionary
hypothesis that describes not only sister-group relationships but also character-
state transitions. The relative position of character-state transitions determines
branch lengths—effectively, the amount of evolution between the speciation
events encompassed by the cladogram. This allows measurement of the phy-
logenetic distance among analyzed taxa as disparity (the number of characters
separating taxa through their most recent shared divergence point) rather than
as raw similarity (10, 18, 47).
The enhanced ability to understand character evolution is at least as valuable
as recognizing clades, particularly where the analysis includes morphological
data (9–11). Advantages include the replacement of statistical correlations by
phylogenetic correlations among characters, so that the active origination of a
character state can be distinguished from mere passive inheritance from a shared
ancestor. Also, the co-occurrence of transitions in two or more characters on
the same branches can be interpreted in terms of the underlying evolutionary
mechanism. Given a cladistic branch of several character-state transitions, two
extremes of interpretation are possible. The saltation model (9–11) argues for
a null hypothesis that the co-transitional characters are developmentally linked
(pleiotropic) and reflect a single speciation event. In contrast, the adaptive
model (27, 75) assumes that the accumulation of developmentally independent
character states in response to selection pressures is gradual, and probably in-
volves phylogenetically intermediate species absent from the sampled terminal
taxa (either deliberately excluded or not yet known to science).
More recently, morphological phylogenies have been supplemented (or, in
many cases, supplanted) by molecular phylogenies based on nucleic acid base
sequences. These have proved especially valuable for comparing taxa that are
P1: ARK/ary P2: ARK
highly morphologically divergent, plesiomorphically simple, or secondarily

simplified by reduction (and hence have insufficient clearly homologous struc-
tures) and for elucidating cases of parallel evolution (9). Often, nonmolecular
characters are “mapped” across molecular phylogenies rather than included in
the parsimony analysis (54); this approach is preferable for ecological and con-
tinuously variable phenotypic characters but is a suboptimal way of analyzing
discrete phenotypic characters (10).
Constraints on Molecular Phylogenies

The insights gained by applying phylogenetic techniques to the Siluro-Devonian

radiation are remarkable given the many severe handicaps. First, extinct Paleo-
zoic plants do not yield DNA, and large swathes of pioneering land plants have
left no close extant relatives—half of the Paleozoic plant groups traditionally
regarded as taxonomic classes (albeit most paraphyletic) are “extinct.” Thus,
molecular attempts to understand the evolutionary origins of bryophytes would
be greatly assisted by sequencing extinct rhyniophytes (9). Similarly, studies
of fern origins need DNA from extinct cladoxylaleans, stauropteridaleans, and
zygopteridaleans; studies of equisetaleans need DNA from extinct iridopteri-
daleans; and studies of gymnosperms need DNA from extinct “trimerophytes”
and “progymnosperms.”
Second, the untestability of such groups extends to experimental approaches
that (a) separate ecophenotypic from genetically controlled variation, (b) di-
rectly observe ontogeny, and (c) test for pleiotropic and epigenetic behavior in
key developmental genes.
Third, the Siluro-Devonian radiation occurred either quickly (≤100 million
years; see 66) or very quickly (35–50 million years; see 11) relative to the
much longer period separating the radiation from present-day floras testable by
sequencing. Such deep, rapid radiations are difficult to capture using clocklike
molecules; those changing fast enough to capture the relationships of the classes
and orders emerging during the radiation are now oversaturated with mutations,
and slower molecules not oversaturated changed too slowly to capture key
events (10).
Within vascular plants, molecular and morphological assessments of phy-
logeny at the level of orders and below give similar results (93), but at deeper
levels—for example, the divergence of major groups of ferns, horsetails, and
seed plants—phylogenetic resolution is poor. These difficulties highlight the
weakness of analyses based solely on living species (cf. 1, 76). Rather, fu-
ture progress hinges on solving the relationships of several fossil groups of
uncertain status (e.g., “trimerophytes,” Cladoxylales, Zygopteridales) with re-
spect to the living ferns, horsetails, and seed plants (66, 107). Also, combined
analyses of molecular sequences from multiple loci, and large-scale structural
P1: ARK/ary P2: ARK
280 BATEMAN ET AL
characteristics of the genome (e.g. introns, inversions; 94), may prove more in-
formative than oversaturated base mutations when assessing deep phylogenetic
patterns in land plants.
Thus, molecular data have been less helpful that might be supposed in un-
ravelling the Siluro-Devonian radiation, though they have usefully revealed the
fallacy of viewing certain pteridophytes as “living fossils” unchanged since the
radiation. The most notable examples are the phenotypically simple Psilotaceae
and Ophioglossaceae, which are actually secondarily reduced “pseudoplesio-
morphs” rather than truly primitive relicts (9, 93). Sequencing has also re-
vealed that among truly primitive lineages, such as the homosporous lycop-
sid Huperzia, most of the extant species may nonetheless be of recent origin
and trivially distinct (139); longevity of clades does not necessarily equate with
longevity of their constituent species.
Constraints on Morphological Phylogenies

Drawbacks to molecular analyses place unusually strong emphasis on morpho-
logical studies, particularly those that successfully integrate extant “living fos-
sils” and decidedly dead fossils. If the plant fossil record is taken at face value,
a punctuational pattern is evident—long periods of stasis are separated by much
shorter periods of rapid change (43). Although this model has found favor with
few neo-Darwinians, it is nonetheless congruent with the neo-Darwinian tenet
that the dominant mode of selection is stabilizing selection, which precludes
morphological change. The periods of change can be viewed either as (a) the
result of strong directional selection or as (b) drift or saltation in the absence of
directional selection. Whatever the underlying cause, the key point is that there
is no “morphological clock,” and as morphology is the direct manifestation of
evolution, it is best placed to resolve rapid, deep radiations (10).
Unfortunately, two factors seriously limit our ability to resolve radiations
morphologically. The first is the patchy fossil record. This can be exaggerated—
the best of the conceptual whole plants, painstakingly reconstructed during over
a century of paleobotanical research, are remarkably well understood (for exam-
ple, see the near-complete evidence of morphology and reproductive morphol-
ogy in presumed primitive taxa such as Aglaophyton in References 66, 67, 99).
However, for less readily preserved groups such as the “bryophytes,” and preser-
vationally challenging periods such as the all-important Late Silurian–Earliest
Devonian, the plants and the resulting data are fragmentary. Consequently,
discussions of the Siluro-Devonian frequently focus on the overall assemblage
of phenotypic characters available to land plants during particular time slices
(6, 21, 40, 70). Although this approach can encompass a much greater propor-
tion of the fossil record, only suites of characters packaged in a single plant
(and thus the expression of a single genome) offer meaningful evolutionary
P1: ARK/ary P2: ARK
interpretations. The pivotal role played by fossils in many plant phylogenies

(29, 65–67, 91, 109) is often due to unique combinations of characters in a
single species (9, 126). Doyle (30) famously compared and contrasted species
trees with gene trees, but we could equally well contrast species trees with
“organ trees” based on very limited data. Given the propensity of plants for
mosaic evolution, such trees have poor probabilities of accuracy (12).
The second limiting factor is the relative paucity, simplicity, and high vari-
ability of features observed in the early land plants. This constraint reduces
the number of potential synapomorphic characters. Also, the combination of
morphological–anatomical simplicity and the impossibility of direct experi-

mentation on extinct species renders primary homology more difficult to test
before phylogeny reconstruction, and the small number of characters renders
secondary homology difficult to test after phylogeny reconstruction by the con-
gruence test of parsimony. These problems weaken key phylogenetic asser-
tions. For example, the now widely accepted separation of the lycophytes from
the remaining eutracheophytes (5, 6) leaves a group—the euphyllophytes of
Kenrick & Crane (66)—diagnosed primarily by homologues to megaphyllous
leaves, yet these are questionably present in the basal members of the clade
(the paraphyletic “trimerophytes.” Similarly, the synapomorphies of the ferns
appear disconcertingly “retrospective” (125) when sought in basal fernlike taxa
such as Iridopteridales, Cladoxylopsida, Stenokoleales, Stauropteridales, and
Zygopteridaceae sensu lato, wherein characters such as branching patterns and
stelar anatomy are ill defined and highly homoplastic (107).
Not surprisingly, homoplasy levels appear high in cladistic studies of
Devonian plants; they may in part reflect genuine evolutionary processes rather
than erroneous prior assertions of homology, given the presumed relatively
poor developmental canalization (9, 26, 127). Stein (127) recently advocated a
“strong-inference” approach, modeled on cladistics, for identifying homology
at the level of developmental processes. Expanding on the “telome theory” of
Zimmermann (140), units of developmental dynamic defining a relationship be-
tween external and/or internal environmental cues and developmental outcomes
are termed evolutionary developmental gates (EDGs). Each hypothesized EDG
employs a “logical conditional” (by analogy with logic gates in programming
theory) and is assembled into networks specifying a causal relationship be-
tween developmental processes and resultant morphological structures. EDG
networks can be tested by comparison with evidence of known developmen-
tal processes, computer modeling, and evolutionary-phylogenetic comparisons
between hypothesized ancestor-descendant pairs (or, potentially, among sister
groups as three-item statements).
To illustrate this approach, Stein proposed four developmental modules un-
derlying the morphology of a primitive Devonian shoot system (telome): (a)
P1: ARK/ary P2: ARK
282 BATEMAN ET AL
establishment of self-recognition and auxin activity at the shoot apex; (b) normal
cell division, modeled as an iterative and recursive process; (c) developmen-
tal switches and cascades leading to normal tissue of epidermis, cortex, and
vascular tissues; and (d ) establishment of new shoot apices by reassignment of
self-recognition of the apex, during either bifurcation or de novo apex formation.
Although more detail is required to enable important evolutionary comparisons
with more derived taxa, conceptualizing homology as a developmental dy-
namic (as opposed to static, end-result morphology) may significantly improve
our understanding of both phylogenetic relationships and underlying develop-
mental/evolutionary causal agents during the primary land plant radiation (127).
The resulting phylogenetic characters would be truly transformational and their
degrees of dependency truly tested (8, 9).
INTERPRETING THE SILURO-DEVONIAN

RADIATION(S)
Defining and Categorizing Radiations
Evolutionary radiations pose three primary challenges: (a) satisfactorily defin-
ing a radiation; (b) distinguishing among the “unholy trinity” of clade origina-
tion, radiation, and migration; and (c) identifying the underlying cause(s) of the
radiation. There are many definitions of radiations, despite the fact that most
authors use no explicit definition. Bateman (10) argued that a radiation could be
defined most effectively using one or both of two properties: species diversity
and phenotypic character diversity (the latter being strongly positively corre-
lated with higher taxonomic diversity). Using either criterion, the best measure
is the net surfeit of rate of gain over rate of loss in a specified clade during
a specified time interval. And using either criterion, the fossil record clearly
suggests that the first major radiation of vascular land plants peaked during the
Early Devonian (66, 70).
Timing originations is more problematic; the major Devonian clades emerge,
apparently fully formed at ca. 400 mya, from a putative period of preservation-
ally discouraging worldwide marine regression in the Late Silurian (66). Ex-
trapolation from their cladogram suggests that all of the major clades between
liverworts and euphyllophytes evolved during that period, offering a maximum
window of 35 my for a multiclass level radiation from a single putative ter-
restrialized ancestor (11). However, Kenrick & Crane (66, Figure 7.15; 67,
Figure 4) controversially depicted the liverworts as evolving at the beginning
of the preservational hiatus, but the remaining embryophytes diverging close
to the end. Middle Devonian origins for the primitive, arguably fernlike clade
of cladoxylopsids and relatives, and of the “progymnosperms,” were followed
P1: ARK/ary P2: ARK
by Late Devonian origins of the “pteridosperms,” sphenopsids, and bona fide

derived ferns, together spanning at least a further 35 my. Other workers also
support a more prolonged radiation (40, 57; WE Stein, personal communica-
tion, 1998).
Proportionally, the increase in species number during the Early Devonian ra-
diation is great, but the total numbers involved are small relative to the radical
increase in phenotypic diversity. Rapid, highly divergent increases in com-
plexity accompanied by relatively low speciation rates (and thus many vacant
niches) constitute a novelty radiation sensu Erwin (45; see also 24, 26). This
contrasts strongly with a niche-filling adaptive radiation, which also occurs

within a single clade but involves slower and less profound phenotypic diversi-
fication and much greater species diversification. Given that this contrast relies
on decoupling of phylogenetic disparity and species diversity (the latter corre-
lating more closely with niche differentiation), it is theoretically possible that
an adaptive radiation could be mistaken for a novelty radiation—but only in
the unlikely event of massive extinction of phenotypically intermediate species
that left no fossil record (11).
Environmental Conquests and Ecological Constraints

In retrospect (and in comparison with the Cambrian radiation of metazoan an-
imals in the marine realm; 33), a novelty radiation should have been expected
for the initial diversification of vascular plants; competition (and thus selection)
has little role to play in habitats profoundly undersaturated in species. The very
high rate of generation of profound phenotypic mutants evident in the modern
flora is almost wholly filtered out by competition in saturated ecosystems (11).
However, in the early Devonian ecosystems, saltational mutants would have
been produced even more frequently, given their weaker developmental canal-
ization and, in the case of “bryophytes” and “protracheophytes” with long-lived
haploid phases, their lack of buffering by second alleles of specific genes. Also,
mere economic establishment (preferably but not essentially accompanied by
reproductive success; 24) would have been accomplished relatively easily in
the undersaturated habitats.
Theory would then require subsequent radiations within the land plants at
lower taxonomic levels to increasingly approach the adaptive mode, as develop-
mental canalization strengthened and ecospace became increasingly crowded,
encouraging competition and thus discouraging the establishment of radically
novel phenotypes; ecological constraints generate a negative feedback loop
(11, 24, 26, 45, 138). At this threshold of phenotypic and ecological complex-
ity, other evolutionary processes come into play. Decreases in phenotypic
complexity, such as those generating many “living fossils,” can drive evolution
by resetting the phenotypic clock, allowing the lineage to exploit a different
P1: ARK/ary P2: ARK
284 BATEMAN ET AL
(relatively uncompetitive) niche (9). In a fully occupied landscape, incumbent

advantage can exclude theoretically fitter organisms, denied a foothold through
the happenstance of prior occupation by other species (24, 53, 92, 104).
Once primary vacancy of niches in a habitat has been eliminated (saturation),
opportunities for further evolution within that habitat focus on subdivision of
existing niches or the occupation of secondary vacancies created by extrinsic
environmental perturbations (ecological radiations). Preaptation (specifically,
exaptation) becomes increasingly evolutionarily credible, as the repertoire of
phenotypic characters increases and extrinsically driven niche vacancies allow
potential functional switching (if we transfer focus from the physical landscape
to the theoretical adaptive landscape of gene frequency variation, the latter tem-
porarily becomes a “seascape,” changing too rapidly to be tracked by changes
in gene frequencies through populations; 10). Alternatively, new habitats must
be invaded, a challenge generally requiring additional key innovations.
Overall, this model predicts a nested and fractal pattern of radiations, each
generating more species and fewer higher taxa than the last as the average degree
of phenotypic divergence between ancestor and descendant decreases. It also
implies that attempts to explain the Early Devonian increases in diversity using
adaptive landscapes (69, 89) may be misplaced; competition among plants was
restricted by their tenuous hold on the abiotic landscape, which acted as a
passive environmental filter for any viable novel phenotypes.
When compared with the above model, observed patterns of diversity suggest
that Early and Middle Devonian ecology offered weak constraints to evolution
relative to the Late Devonian, given that much of the land surface was either
uncolonized or minimally occupied by vascular plants. Potential for positive
feedbacks was also strong in areas such as nutrient cycling, creation of new re-
source spaces by morphological innovation, and the development of mutualistic
interactions with the concomitantly expanding faunas and mycotas. The con-
striction of such opportunities was probably scale-dependent, beginning within
certain resource pools while greater flexibility persisted in others. Landscape-
scale opportunities for evolutionary innovation may have remained permissive,
even when more local opportunies were becoming increasingly constrained.
Elusive Key Innovations

Erwin’s (45) caution against uncritical acceptance of assertions of key inno-
vations could have been written specifically for the Siluro-Devonian terrestrial
radiation; most authors (e.g. 6, 21, 40, 57, 69, 70, 90, 95, 117, 124, 132) have
either explicitly or implicitly identified one or more key innovations as crucial
to the success of a particular taxonomic group. A bona fide key innovation
should be a synapomorphy that was acquired immediately prior to an equally
bona fide evolutionary radiation and can be shown to have been a far greater
P1: ARK/ary P2: ARK
stimulus to that radiation than any other synapomorphies acquired on the same
phylogenetic branch.
Following the preferred phylogeny of Kenrick & Crane (66), embryophyte
synapomorphies include multicellular sporophytes and the desiccation resis-
tance conferred by both cuticles and sporopollenin-walled spores. The func-
tional values of these characters for terrestrialization are clear, yet there is
no evidence that any or all of these characters prompted an immediate ra-
diation. This conclusion also applies to the stomates that are present in most
stomatophytes (tracheophytes plus “bryophytes” excluding liverworts), and the
pronounced axial gametophyte, terminal gametangia, and well-developed spo-

rangiophore of the mosses plus tracheophytes clade. The basal members of the
Polysporangiomorpha clade are “protracheophyte”-grade genera such as Hor-
neophyton and Aglaophyton. They exhibit branched, independent sporophytes
isomorphic with gametophytes that possess sunken archegonia. Similarly, the
rhyniopsids, basal to the tracheophytes sensu lato, provide the first evidence
of vascular tissue more sophisticated than bryophytic leptomes and of diversi-
fication in sporangial morphology and function, together with stronger sporo-
phytic dominance in the life history. The unique combinations of characters
in these extinct taxa provide us with key information about the sequence of
character acquisition within the land plant clade, but again they did not clearly
engender a profound increase in the diversity of either phenotypic characters or
species.
Even the subsequent dichotomy into the Lycophytina and Euphyllophytina,
and within the Lycophytina into the Lycopsida and more derived zosterophylls
of the Sawdoniales, did not immediately add greatly to the overall diversity of
characters. The relative indistinctness of these groups is well illustrated by the
paraphyletic or even polyphyletic nature of genera such as Cooksonia (“protra-
cheophyte” grade) and Zosterophyllum (“zosterophyll” grade sensu lato) and
by the ambiguous placements of the basal members of the “trimerophyte” grade
within the euphyllophytes (66).
Rather, overall character diversity and complexity increased more rapidly
when the more derived members of these first-formed vascular plant lineages
became sufficiently distinct to show parallel evolution. Examples include the
transition from unipolar (rhizomatous) to bipolar (upright) growth and the as-
sociated development of vascularized roots; the acquisition of leaves sensu lato
by lineages as phylogenetically disparate as mosses, lycopsids, and various
euphyllophyte groups; increasingly contrasting maturation patterns and cross-
sectional complexity in vascular strands, and their consequences for biomechan-
ical properties; and the much greater diversity and complexity of meristems that
allowed the emergence of distinct orders of branching and a wider variety of
(often disposable) organs.
P1: ARK/ary P2: ARK
286 BATEMAN ET AL
Later in the Devonian, these characters were supplemented with the develop-
ment of at least the early stages of secondary growth in perhaps five lineages (66)
and with at least the early stages of heterospory in perhaps ten lineages (9, 24).
Secondary thickening conferred the ability to exploit the vertical dimension,
which in turn allowed a switch from a patchwork of monotypic “lawns” to more
diverse nonclonal communities. Heterospory was a key precursor for more ef-
fective resourcing of propagules, facilitating more K-selective strategies. Both
are tempting as key innovations, but neither has been tested effectively in this
role.
Summarizing the biomechanical data, developmental processes leading to

improvement of mechanical properties were driven primarily by selection for
sustaining water supply, following the colonization of new biotopes or after
reaching a critical height or sustainable level of branch complexity. Examples of
such innovations include physiologically inactive water-conducting elements,
the hypodermal sterome, and secondary xylem. These features served as im-
portant preaptations for improving mechanical properties, permitting greater
sustainable height and more complex branched architectures. Among early
land plants, biomechanical analyses indicate that structures evolved primarily
for improving water relations were repeatedly co-opted for mechanical support.
This resulted in relatively simple but multifunctional tissues, which significantly
improved the potential for successfully colonizing new habitats and occupying
an increasing variety of niches.
The appearance of secondary growth (arborescence sensu 8) did not only
have significance for increasing stability of upright stems and the possibility
of producing truly large-bodied (arboreous) growth forms; it also allowed a
far wider spectrum of growth architectures, the basis for niche-filling habits
that ranged from fully self-supporting plants to lianas. Secondary growth also
conferred the ability to adjust conductance and mechanical properties of the
axial system in accordance with local environmental conditions. For this reason,
many of the early land plants probably faced severe constraints in exploiting
new areas and niches compared with later phases of the primary land plant
radiation.
CONCLUSIONS
No one character can be accused of having engendered the Siluro-Devonian
radiation. Even if attempts are made to tease apart the radiation into a nested
sequence of smaller-scale radiations, key innovations are still not readily iden-
tified. It seems more likely that a critical mass of phenotypic characters accu-
mulated in several clades, eventually offering sufficient flexibility to define and
divide many niches. This process eventually generated the threshold number of
P1: ARK/ary P2: ARK
niches necessary to form communities that exhibited broadly modern ecological

dynamics (if not modern species diversity; 25, 26).
There can be little doubt that, as this threshold approached, the physiological
adaptations that enabled the putative (if very poorly preserved) original terres-
trialization event into ever-wet soils continued to evolve, aiding the invasion
of habitats of increasing degrees of abiotic hostility. This process may well
have been aided by profound changes in the environment, viewed increasingly
as fundamentally nonuniformitarian in character. In particular, the precipitous
decrease in atmospheric CO2 and concomitant (if slightly delayed) increase in
O2 (toward its Late Carboniferous maximum; 13, 85) should have greatly in-
creased the effective balance between photosynthesis and respiration. Thus, the
didactic distinction made by Bateman (7) between the physiological, anatomi-
cal, and morphological phases of plant evolution is revealed as simplistic.
Moreover, Bateman’s (7) attribution of the ecologically driven “behavioral
phase” of plant evolution to the post-Devonian is being progressively under-
mined as it becomes increasingly clear that paleobiologists have underesti-
mated the role of interkingdom coevolution in early terrestrial ecosystems. For
example, many enigmatic fossil taxa such as the Nematophytales (putative
liverworts of the all-important Late Silurian preservation gap) and Prototax-
ites are increasingly perceived as fungal, and Spongiophyton (from the Early
Devonian of Gaspé; 128) has a fungal architecture strongly comparable with
modern lecanoralean lichens. Also, the recognition of both mycorrhizal (135)
and saprophytic (133) fungi in the Rhynie Chert strongly supports arguments
that fungi played an important mediating role allowing plants to accommo-
date to the rigors of terrestrial life (97, 116). When its diverse carnivorous and
phytophagous arthropods (74) and representatives of the embryophyte sister
group, the aquatic charophytes (134), are also considered, the Chert graphi-
cally illustrates that understanding the origin and early diversification of the
land flora requires consideration of relationships among kingdoms, as well as
relationships among classes and orders within Plantae.
Despite recent successes, additional reconstructions of fossil species, and
genuinely worldwide floristic treatments of Siluro-Devonian plant communities
and habitats, are badly needed. Nonetheless, even the available data are consid-
erably better than those underpinning the much-vaunted studies of the marine
Cambrian “explosion” of animal life, and at the level of exceptionally preserved
Lagerstätten, the terrestrial Rhynie Chert undoubtedly ranks alongside the ma-
rine Burgess Shale (11, 18, 33, 55). Devonian ecosystems evidently constitute
an excellent working laboratory for studying the relationships between the form
and function of organisms during profound evolutionary radiations—especially
primary radiations that occur across an ecologically undersaturated landscape
and in a strongly nonuniformitarian environment.
P1: ARK/ary P2: ARK
288 BATEMAN ET AL
Visit the Annual Reviews home page at

http://www.AnnualReviews.org
Literature Cited
1. Albert VA, Backlund A, Bremer K, Chase ed. DS Ingram, A Hudson, pp. 63–102.
MW, Manhart JR, et al. 1994. Functional Linnean Society Symposium Series 16.
constraints and rbcL evidence for land London: Academic
plant phylogeny. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 12. Bateman RM, Simpson NJ. 1998. Com-
81:534–67 paring phylogenetic signals from repro-
2. Albert VA, Gustafsson MHG, Di Lau- ductive and vegetative organs. In Ad-
renzio L. 1998. Ontogenetic systematics, vances in Plant Reproductive Biology,

molecular developmental genetics, and ed. S Owens, P Rudall. London: Royal
the angiosperm petal. In Molecular Sys- Botanic Gardens Kew. In press
tematics of Plants 2, ed. D Soltis, P Soltis, 13. Berner RA. 1993. Palaeozoic atmosphere
JJ Doyle. London: Chapman & Hall. In CO2: importance of solar radiation and
press plant evolution. Science 261:68–70
3. Algeo TJ, Berner RA, Maynard JB, 14. Berner RA, Canfield DE. 1989. A new
Scheckler SE. 1995. Late Devonian model for atmospheric oxygen over
oceanic anoxic events and biotic crises: Phanerozoic time. Am. J. Sci. 289:333–61
“rooted” in the evolution of vascular 15. Bopp M, Capesius I. 1996. New aspects
plants? GSA Today 5:45, 64–66 of bryophyte taxonomy provided by a
4. Arrington JM, Mishler BD, Lewis LA, molecular approach. Bot. Acta 109:1–5
Vilgalys RJ, Manos PS. 1997. A molecu- 16. Bremer K, Humphries CJ, Mishler BD,
lar phylogeny of the bryophytes and their Churchill SP. 1987. On cladistic relation-
relationships to the tracheophytes based ships in green plants. Taxon 36:339–49
on chloroplast 16S and 23S ribosomal- 17. Bridge JS, van Veen PM, Matten LC.
coding genes. Am. J. Bot. 84:12 (Abstr.) 1980. Aspects of sedimentology, palynol-
5. Banks HP. 1975. Reclassification of Psilo- ogy and palaeobotany of the Upper Devo-
phyta. Taxon 24:401–13 nian of southern Kerry Head, Co. Kerry,
6. Banks HP. 1981. Time of appearance of Ireland. Geol. J. 15:143–70
some plant biocharacters during Siluro- 18. Briggs DEG, Fortey RA, Wills MA. 1992.
Devonian time. Can. J. Bot. 59:1292–96 Morphological disparity in the Cambrian.
7. Bateman RM. 1991. Palaeoecology. In Science 256:1670–73
Plant Fossils in Geological Investigation: 19. Capesius I, Bopp M. 1997. New classifi-
The Palaeozoic, ed. CJ Cleal, pp. 34–116. cation of liverworts based on molecular
Chichester UK: Horwood and morphological data. Plant Syst. Evol.
8. Bateman RM. 1994. Evolutionary–deve- 207:87–97
lopmental change in the growth archi- 20. Chaloner WG. 1988. Early land plants:
tecture of fossil rhizomorphic lycopsids: the saga of a great conquest. In Proc. 14th
scenarios constructed on cladistic founda- Int. Bot. Congr., ed. W Greuter, B Zim-
tions. Biol. Rev. 69:527–97 mer, pp. 301–6. Königstein, Germany:
9. Bateman RM. 1996. Nonfloral homoplasy Koeltz
and evolutionary scenarios in living and 21. Chaloner WG, Sheerin A. 1979. Devo-
fossil land plants. In Homoplasy: The Re- nian macrofloras. Spec. Pap. Palaeont.
currence of Similarity in Evolution, ed. 23:145–61
MJ Sanderson, L Hufford, pp. 91–130. 22. Coen E, Meyerowitz EM. 1991. The
London: Academic war of the whorls: genetic interactions
10. Bateman RM. 1998. Integrating molec- controlling flower development. Nature
ular and morphological evidence for 353:31–37
evolutionary radiations. In Advances in 23. Collinson ME, Scott AC. 1987. Factors
Plant Molecular Systematics, ed. PM controlling the organisation and evolution
Hollingsworth, RM Bateman, RJ Gornall. of ancient plant communities. In Organi-
London: Chapman & Hall. In press sation of Communities Past and Present,
11. Bateman RM, DiMichele WA. 1994. ed. GHR Gee, PS Giller, pp. 399–420.
Saltational evolution of form in vascular Oxford: Blackwell
plants: a neoGoldschmidtian synthesis. 24. DiMichele WA, Bateman RM. 1996.
In Shape and Form in Plants and Fungi, Plant paleoecology and evolutionary
P1: ARK/ary P2: ARK
inference: two examples from the Paleo- ary Radiations, ed. PD Taylor, GP Lar-
zoic. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 90:223–47 wood, pp. 351–76. Oxford: Oxford Univ.
25. DiMichele WA, Hook RW, et al. 1992. Press
Paleozoic terrestrial ecosystems. In Ter- 38. Edwards D, Duckett JG, Richardson JB.
restrial Ecosystems Through Time, ed. 1995. Hepatic characters in the earliest
AK Behrensmeyer, JD Damuth, WA land plants. Nature 374:635–36
DiMichele, et al, pp. 205–325. Chicago: 39. Edwards D, Fanning U. 1985. Evolution
Univ. Chicago Press and environment in the Late Silurian–
26. DiMichele WA, Stein WE Jr, Bateman Early Devonian: the rise of the pterido-
RM. 1998. Evolution of primordial pat- phytes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser.
terns of resource partitioning among vas- B 309:147–65
cular land plant classes during the Late Pa- 40. Edwards D, Selden P. 1992. The develop-
leozoic. In Anatomy of Major Radiations, ment of early terrestrial ecosystems. Bot.
ed. W Allmon. New York: Columbia J. Scotl. 46:337–66
Univ. Press. In press 41. Edwards DS. 1980. Evidence for the
27. Donoghue MJ. 1989. Phylogeny and the sporophyte status of the Lower Devo-
analysis of evolutionary sequences, with nian plant Rhynia gwynne-vaughnii Kid-
examples from seed plants. Evolution ston and Lang. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol.
43:1137–56 29:177–88
28. Doyle JA. 1998. Evolutionary radiation of 42. Edwards DS. 1986. Aglaophyton major,
the earliest seed plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. a non-vascular land-plant from the De-
Syst. 29: vonian Rhynie Chert. Bot. J. Linn. Soc.
29. Doyle JA, Donoghue MJ. 1986. Seed 93:173–204
plant phylogeny and the origin of an- 43. Eldredge N, Gould SJ. 1972. Punctuated
giosperms: an experimental cladistic ap- equilibria: an alternative to phyletic grad-
proach. Bot. Rev. 52:321–431 ualism. In Models in Paleobiology, ed.
30. Doyle JJ. 1992. Gene trees and species TJM Schopf, pp. 82–115. San Francisco:
trees: molecular systematics as one- Freeman
character taxonomy. Syst. Bot. 17:144–63 44. Ellick J, Driese SG, Mora CI. 1998. Very
31. Driese SG, Mora CI, Ellick JM. 1997. large plant and root traces from the Early
Morphology and taphonomy of root and to Middle Devonian: implications for
stump casts of the earliest trees (Mid- early terrestrial ecosystems and atmo-
dle to Late Devonian), Pennsylvania spheric p(CO2). Geology 26:143–46
and New York, U.S.A. Palaios 12:524– 45. Erwin D. 1992. A preliminary classifica-
37 tion of evolutionary radiations. Hist. Biol.
32. Duncan TM, Renzaglia KS, Garbary DJ. 6:133–47
1997. Ultrastructure and phylogeny of the 46. Feist M, Feist R. 1997. Oldest record of a
spermatozoids of Chara vulgaris (Charo- bisexual plant. Nature 385:401
phyceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 204:125– 47. Foote M. 1994. Morphological disparity
40 in Ordovician–Silurian crinoids and the
33. Eble GJ. 1998. The role of development early saturation of morphological space.
in evolutionary radiations. In Biodiver- Paleobiology 20:320–44
sity Dynamics: Turnover of Populations, 48. Garbary DJ, Renzaglia KS, Duckett JG.
Taxa, and Communities, ed. ML McKin- 1993. The phylogeny of land plants: a
ney. New York: Columbia Univ. Press. In cladistic analysis based on male gameto-
press genesis. Plant Syst. Evol. 188:237–69
34. Edwards D. 1980. Early land floras. In 49. Geng B-Y. 1992. Studies on Early De-
The Terrestrial Environment and the Ori- vonian flora of Sichuan. Acta Phytotax.
gin of Land Vertebrates, ed. AL Panchen, Sinica 30:197–211
pp. 55–85. New York: Academic 50. Gensel PG. 1992. Phylogenetic relation-
35. Edwards D. 1993. Cells and tissues in ships of the zosterophylls and lycopsids:
the vegetative sporophytes of early land evidence from morphology, paleoecol-
plants. New Phytol. 125:225–47 ogy, and cladistic methods of inference.
36. Edwards D. 1996. New insights into early Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 79:450–73
land ecosystems: a glimpse of a Lil- 51. Gensel PG, Andrews HN. 1984. Plant Life
liputian world. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. in the Devonian. New York: Praeger
90:159–74 52. Gensel PG, Johnson NG, Strother PK.
37. Edwards D, Davies KL. 1990. Interpre- 1991. Early land plant debris: Hooker’s
tations of early land plant radiations: “waifs and strays”? Palaios 5:520–47
‘facile adaptationist guesswork’ or rea- 53. Gilinsky NL, Bambach RK. 1987. Asym-
soned speculation? In Major Evolution- metrical patterns of origination and
P1: ARK/ary P2: ARK
290 BATEMAN ET AL
extinction in higher taxa. Paleobiology IV. Restorations of the vascular cryp-

13:427–45 togams, and discussion of their bearing
54. Givnish TJ, Sytsma KJ, ed. 1997. Molec- on the general morphology of the Pteri-
ular Evolution and Adaptive Radiation. dophyta and the origin of the organisation
Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press of land-plants. Trans. R. Soc. Edinburgh
55. Gould SJ. 1989. Wonderful Life: The 52:831–54
Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. 69. Knoll AH, Niklas KJ. 1987. Adaptation,
New York: Norton plant evolution, and the fossil record. Rev.
56. Graham LE. 1993. Origin of Land Plants. Palaeobot. Palynol. 50:127–49
New York: Wiley 70. Knoll AH, Niklas KJ, Gensel PG, Tiffney
57. Gray J. 1993. Major Paleozoic land plant BH. 1984. Character diversification and
evolutionary bio-events. Palaeogeogr. patterns of evolution in early vascular
Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 104:153–69 plants. Paleobiology 10:34–47
58. Grenfell HR. 1995. Probable fossil 71. Konopka AS, Herendeen PS, Smith Mer-
zygnematacean algal spore genera. Rev. rill GL, Crane PR. 1997. Sporophytes and
Palaeobot. Palynol. 84:201–20 gametophytes of Polytrichaceae from the
59. Hedderson TA, Chapman RL, Rootes Campanian (Late Cretaceous) of Georgia,
WL. 1996. Phylogenetic relationships of U.S.A. Int. J. Plant Sci. 158:489–99
bryophytes inferred from nuclear encoded 72. Kranz HD, Huss VAR. 1996. Molecular
rRNA gene sequences. Plant Syst. Evol. evolution of pteridophytes and their rela-
200:213–24 tionships to seed plants: evidence from
60. Hedderson TA, Cox CJ, Goffinett B, complete 18S rRNA gene sequences.
Chapman RL. 1997. Phylogenetic rela- Plant Syst. Evol. 202:1–11
tionships among the main moss lineages 73. Kranz HD, Miks D, Siegler M-L, Cape-
inferred from 18S rRNA gene sequences. sius I, Sensen W, Huss VAR. 1995.
Am. J. Bot. 84:17 (Abstr.) The origin of land plants: phyloge-
61. Hemsley AR. 1994. The origin of the land netic relationships among charophytes,
plant sporophyte: an interpolational sce- bryophytes, and vascular plants inferred
nario. Biol. Rev. 69:263–74 from complete small-subunit ribosomal
62. Hiesel R, von Haeseler A, Brennicke A. RNA gene sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 41:
1994. Plant mitochondrial nucleic acid se- 74–84
quences as a tool for phylogenetic analy- 74. Labandeira CC, Phillips TL. 1996. In-
sis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:634–38 sect fluid-feeding on Upper Pennsylva-
63. Hotton CL, Hueber FM, Griffing DH, nian tree ferns (Palaeodictyoptera, Marat-
Bridge JS. 1998. Early terrestrial plant tiales) and the early history of the
paleoenvironments: an example from piercing-and-sucking functional feeding
the Emsian of Gaspé, Canada. In Early group. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 89:157–
Land Plants and Their Environments, 83
ed. PG Gensel, D Edwards. New York: 75. Lauder GV. 1996. The argument from de-
Columbia Univ. Press. In press sign. In Adaptation, ed. MR Ruse, GV
64. Kenrick P. 1994. Alternation of genera- Lauder, pp. 55–91. New York: Academic
tions in land plants: new phylogenetic 76. Manhart JR. 1994. Phylogenetic analy-
and palaeobotanical evidence. Biol. Rev. sis of green plant rbcL sequences. Molec.
69:293–330 Phylogeny Evol. 3:114–27
65. Kenrick P, Crane PR. 1991. Water- 77. Manhart JR. 1995. Chloroplast 16S rDNA
conducting cells in early fossil land sequences and phylogenetic relationships
plants: implications for the early evolu- of fern allies and ferns. Am. Fern J. 85:
tion of tracheophytes. Bot. Gaz. 152:335– 182–92
56 78. Manhart JR, Palmer JD. 1990. The gain
66. Kenrick P, Crane PR. 1997a. The Ori- of two chloroplast tRNA introns marks
gin and Early Diversification of Land the green algal ancestors of land plants.
Plants: A Cladistic Study. Smithsonian Nature 345:268–70
Series in Comparative Evolutionary Biol- 79. McCourt RM, Karol KG, Guerlesquin M,
ogy. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Inst. Feist M. 1996. Phylogeny of extant genera
Press in the family Characeae (Charales, Charo-
67. Kenrick P, Crane PR. 1997b. The origin phyceae) based on rbcL sequences and
and early evolution of plants on land. Na- morphology. Am. J. Bot. 83:125–31
ture 389:33–39 80. McElwain JC, Chaloner WG. 1995.
68. Kidston R, Lang WH. 1921. On Old Red Stomatal index and density of fossil plants
Sandstone plants showing structure, from track atmospheric CO2 in the Palaeozoic.
the Rhynie chert bed, Aberdeenshire. Part Ann. Bot. 76:389–95
P1: ARK/ary P2: ARK
81. Melkonian M, Surek B. 1995. Phylogeny spheric interactions. Bot. J. Scotl. 47:151–
of the Chlorophyta: congruence between 75
ultrastructural and molecular evidence. 98. Remy W, Gensel PG, Hass H. 1993. The
Bull. Soc. Zool. France 120:191–208 gametophyte generation of some early
82. Mishler BD, Churchill SP. 1984. A cladis- Devonian land plants. Int. J. Plant Sci.
tic approach to the phylogeny of the 154:35–58
“bryophytes.” Brittonia 36:406–24 99. Remy W, Hass H. 1996. New informa-
83. Mishler BD, Churchill SP. 1985. Transi- tion on gametophytes and sporophytes of
tion to a land flora: phylogenetic relation- Aglaophyton major and inferences about
ships of the green algae and bryophytes. possible environmental adaptations. Rev.
Cladistics 1:305–28 Palaeobot. Palynol. 90:175–93
84. Mishler BD, Lewis LA, Buchheim MA, 100. Remy W, Remy D, Hass H. 1997. Or-
Renzaglia KS, Garbary DJ, et al. 1994. ganisation, Wuchsform und Lebensstrate-
Phylogenetic relationships of the “green gien früher Landpflanzen des Unterde-
algae” and “bryophytes.” Ann. Mo. Bot. vons. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 119:509–62
Gard. 81:451–83 101. Renzaglia KS, McFarland KD, Smith
85. Mora CI, Driese SG, Colarusso LA. 1996. DK. 1997. Anatomy and ultrastructure of
Middle to Late Paleozoic atmospheric the sporophyte of Takakia ceratophylla
CO2 levels from soil carbonate and or- (Bryophyta). Am. J. Bot. 84:1337–50
ganic matter. Science 271:1105–7 102. Retallack GJ. 1985. Fossil soils as
86. Niklas KJ. 1976. Morphological and on- grounds for interpreting the advent of
togenetic reconstruction of Parka decipi- large plants and animals on land. Philos.
ens Fleming and Pachytheca Hooker from Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 309:105–42
the Lower Old Red Sandstone, Scotland. 103. Retallack GJ. 1997. Early forest soils and
Trans. R. Soc. Edinburgh B69:483–99 their role in Devonian global change. Sci-
87. Niklas KJ. 1992. Plant Biomechanics: An ence 276:583–85
Engineering Approach to Plant Form and 104. Rosenzweig M, McCord R. 1991. Incum-
Function. Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press bent replacements: evidence for long-
88. Niklas KJ. 1994a. Plant Allometry: The term evolutionary progress. Paleobiology
Scaling of Form and Process. Chicago: 17:202–13
Chicago Univ. Press 105. Roth A, Mosbrugger V, Neugebauer J.
89. Niklas KJ. 1994b. Morphological evo- 1994. Efficiency and evolution of wa-
lution through complex domains of fitter transport systems in higher plants—
ness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:6772– a modelling approach. Philos. Trans. R.
79 Soc. London Ser. B 345:137–62
90. Niklas KJ. 1997. The Evolutionary Biol- 106. Rothwell GW. 1994. Phylogenetic rela-
ogy of Plants. Chicago: Chicago Univ. tionships among ferns and gymnosperms:
Press an overview. J. Plant Res. 107:411–16
91. Nixon KC, Crepet WL, Stevenson D, Friis 107. Rothwell GW. 1996. Phylogenetic rela-
E-M. 1994. A reevaluation of seed plant tionships of ferns: a paleobotanical per-
phylogeny. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 81:484– spective. In Pteridology in Perspective,
533 ed. JM Camus, M Gibby, RJ Johns, pp.
92. Pimm SL. 1991. The Balance of Nature? 395–404. London: Royal Botanic Gar-
Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press dens Kew
93. Pryer KM, Smith AR, Skog JE. 1995. 108. Rothwell GW, Scheckler SE. 1988. Biol-
Phylogenetic relationships of extant ferns ogy of ancestral gymnosperms. In Origin
based on evidence from morphology and and Evolution of Gymnosperms, ed. CB
rbcL sequences. Am. Fern J. 85:205–82 Beck, pp. 85–134. New York: Columbia
94. Raubeson LA, Jansen RK. 1992. Chloro- Univ. Press
plast DNA evidence on the ancient evolu- 109. Rothwell GW, Serbet R. 1994. Ligno-
tionary split in vascular land plants. Sci- phyte phylogeny and the evolution of
ence 255:1697–99 spermatophytes: a numerical cladistic
95. Raven JA. 1984. Physical correlates of the analysis. Syst. Bot. 19:443–82
morphology of early vascular plants. Bot. 110. Rowe NP, Speck T. 1997. Biomechan-
J. Linn. Soc. 88:105–26 ics of Lycopodiella cernua and Huperzia
96. Raven JA. 1994. Physiological analyses squarrosa: implications for inferring
of aspects of the functioning of vascular growth habits of fossil small-bodied ly-
tissue in early land plants. Bot. J. Scotl. copsids. Med. Nederlands Inst. Toegep.
47:49–64 Geowetensch. TNO 58:293–302
97. Raven JA. 1995. The early evolution of 111. Rowe NP, Speck T, Galtier J. 1993.
land plants: aquatic ancestors and atmo- Biomechanical analysis of a Palaeozoic
P1: ARK/ary P2: ARK
292 BATEMAN ET AL
gymnosperm stem. Proc. R. Soc. London teristics of land plants in relation to en-
(B) 252:19–28 vironment through time. Trans. R. Soc.
112. Scheckler SE. 1986. Geology, floris- Edinburgh B80:321–29
tics and paleoecology of Late Devonian 125. Stein WE. 1983. Iridopteris eriensis from
coal swamps from Appalachian Lauren- the Middle Devonian of North America,
tia (USA). Ann. Soc. Geol. Belg. 109:209– with sytematics of apparently related taxa.
22 Bot. Gaz. 143:401–16
113. Schopf JW. 1994. Disparate rates, dif- 126. Stein WE. 1987. Phylogenetic analysis
fering fates: tempo and mode of evolu- and fossil plants. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol.
tion changed from the Precambrian to the 50:31–61
Phanerozoic. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 127. Stein WE. 1998. Developmental logic:
91:6735–42 establishing a relationship between devel-
114. Schuster RM. 1984. Evolution, phy- opmental process and phylogenetic pat-
logeny and classification of the Hepati- tern in primitive vascular plants. Submit-
cae. In New Manual of Bryology, ed. RM ted

Schuster, pp. 892–1070. Japan: Hattori 128. Stein WE, Harmon GD, Hueber FM.
Botanical Laboratory 1993. Lichens in the Lower Devonian of
115. Scotese CR, McKerrow WS. 1990. Re- North America. Geol. Soc. Amer. Abstr.
vised world maps and introduction. In 25:82
Palaeozoic Palaeogeography and Bio- 129. Stein WE, Wight DC, Beck CB. 1984.
geography, ed. WS McKerrow, CR Possible alternatives for the origin of
Scotese, pp. 1–12. Geol. Soc. Lond. Mem. Sphenopsida. Syst. Bot. 9:102–18
12 130. Stevenson DW, Loconte H. 1996. Ordinal
116. Selosse M-A, Le Tacon F. 1998. The land and familial relationships of pteridophyte
flora: a phototroph-fungus partnership? genera. In Pteridology in Perspective, ed.
Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:15–20 JM Camus, M Gibby, RJ Johns, pp. 435–
117. Shear W. 1991. The early development of 67. London: Royal Botanic Gardens Kew
terrestrial ecosystems. Nature 351:283– 131. Stewart WN, Rothwell GW. 1993. Pa-
89 leobotany and the Evolution of Plants.
118. Smoot EL, Taylor TN. 1986. Structurally Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. 2nd
preserved fossil plants from Antarctica: ed.
II. A Permian moss from the Transantarc- 132. Taylor TN. 1988. The origin of land
tic Mountains. Am. J. Bot. 73:1683–91 plants: some answers, more questions.
119. Speck T, Rowe NP. 1994. Biomechan- Taxon 37:805–33
ical analysis of Pitus dayi: early seed 133. Taylor TN. 1990. Fungal associations in
plant vegetative morphology and its im- the terrestrial palaeoecosystem. Trends
plications on growth habit. J. Plant Res. Ecol. Evol. 5:21–25
107:443–60 134. Tayor TN, Remy W, Hass H. 1992. Fungi
120. Speck T, Rowe NP. 1998. Biomechani- from the Lower Devonian Rhynie Chert:
cal analysis. In Fossil Plants and Spores: Chytridiomycetes. Am. J. Bot. 79:1233–
Modern Techniques, ed. TP Jones, NP 41
Rowe. London: Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. 135. Taylor TN, Remy W, Hass H, Kerp H.
Vol. In press 1995. Fossil arbuscular mycorrhizae from
121. Speck T, Vogellehner D. 1988. Biophysi- the early Devonian. Mycologia 87:560–
cal examinations of the bending stability 73
of various stele types and the upright axes 136. Taylor TN, Taylor EL. 1993. The Biol-
of early ‘vascular’ land plants. Botanica ogy and Evolution of Fossil Plants. En-
Acta 101:262–68 glewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
122. Speck T, Vogellehner D. 1992. Biome- 137. Taylor WA. 1996. Ultrastructure of Lower
chanics and maximum height of some De- Paleozoic dyads from southern Ohio. Rev.
vonian land plants. In Palaeovegetational Palaeobot. Palynol. 92:269–80
Development in Europe, ed. J Kovar-Eder, 138. Valentine JW. 1980. Determinants of di-
pp. 413–22. Vienna: Museum of Natural versity in higher taxonomic categories.
History Paleobiology 6:444–50
123. Speck T, Vogellehner D. 1994. Devo- 139. Wikström N, Kenrick P. 1997. Phylogeny
nische Landpflanzen mit und ohne hypo- of Lycopodiaceae (Lycopsida) and the re-
dermales Sterom—eine biomechanische lationships of Phylloglossum drummondii
Analyse mit Überlegungen zur Frühevo- Kunze based on rbcL sequences. Int. J.
lution des Leit- und Festigungssystems. Plant Sci. 158:862–71
Palaeontographica B233:157–227 140. Zimmermann W. 1965. Die Telomtheorie.
124. Spicer RA. 1989. Physiological charac- Stuttgart: Fischer
Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
Volume 29, 1998
CONTENTS
MOLECULAR TRANS-SPECIES POLYMORPHISM, Jan Klein, Akie
Sato, Sandra Nagl, Colm O'hUigín 1
PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGEOGRAPHY AS ILLUSTRATED BY

FRESHWATER AND TERRESTRIAL TURTLES IN THE
SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES, DeEtte Walker, John C. Avise 23
THE FUNCTIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE HYPORHEIC ZONE
IN STREAMS AND RIVERS, Andrew J. Boulton, Stuart Findlay,
Pierre Marmonier, Emily H. Stanley, H. Maurice Valett 59
ENDANGERED MUTUALISMS: The Conservation of Plant-Pollinator

Interactions, Carol A. Kearns, David W. Inouye, Nickolas M. Waser 83
THE ROLE OF INTRODUCED SPECIES IN THE DEGRADATION

OF ISLAND ECOSYSTEMS: A Case History of Guam, Thomas H.
Fritts, Gordon H. Rodda 113
EVOLUTION OF HELPING BEHAVIOR IN COOPERATIVELY
BREEDING BIRDS, Andrew Cockburn 141
THE ECOLOGICAL EVOLUTION OF REEFS, Rachel Wood 179
ROADS AND THEIR MAJOR ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS, Richard T.

T. Forman, Lauren E. Alexander 207
SEX DETERMINATION, SEX RATIOS, AND GENETIC

CONFLICT, John H. Werren, Leo W. Beukeboom 233
EARLY EVOLUTION OF LAND PLANTS: Phylogeny, Physiology,
and Ecology of the Primary Terrestrial Radiation, Richard M.
Bateman, Peter R. Crane, William A. DiMichele, Paul R. Kenrick, Nick
P. Rowe, Thomas Speck, William E. Stein 263
POSSIBLE LARGEST-SCALE TRENDS IN ORGANISMAL

EVOLUTION: Eight "Live Hypotheses", Daniel W. McShea 293
FUNGAL ENDOPHYTES: A Continuum of Interactions with Host

Plants, K. Saikkonen, S. H. Faeth, M. Helander, T. J. Sullivan 319
FLORAL SYMMETRY AND ITS ROLE IN PLANT-POLLINATOR

SYSTEMS: Terminology, Distribution, and Hypotheses, Paul R. Neal,
Amots Dafni, Martin Giurfa 345
VERTEBRATE HERBIVORES IN MARINE AND TERRESTRIAL
ENVIRONMENTS: A Nutritional Ecology Perspective, J. H. Choat, K.
D. Clements 375
CARBON AND CARBONATE METABOLISM IN COASTAL
AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS, J.-P. Gattuso, M. Frankignoulle, R.
Wollast 405
THE SCIENTIFIC BASIS OF FORESTRY, David A. Perry 435

PATHWAYS, MECHANISMS, AND RATES OF POLYPLOID
FORMATION IN FLOWERING PLANTS, Justin Ramsey, Douglas
W. Schemske 467
BACTERIAL GROWTH EFFICIENCY IN NATURAL AQUATIC
SYSTEMS, Paul A. del Giorgio, Jonathan J. Cole 503
THE CHEMICAL CYCLE AND BIOACCUMULATION OF

MERCURY, François M. M. Morel, Anne M. L. Kraepiel, Marc Amyot 543
PHYLOGENY OF VASCULAR PLANTS, James A. Doyle 567


1-Annurev - Ecolsys.29.1 Early Evolution of Land

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

1-Annurev - Ecolsys.29.1 Early Evolution of Land

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

1-Annurev - Ecolsys.29.1 Early Evolution of Land

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

P1: ARK/ary P2: ARK

September 28, 1998 10:15 Annual Reviews AR067-10

Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1998. 29:263–92

EARLY EVOLUTION OF LAND

CNRS), Université de Montpellier II, 34095 Montpellier cedex 05, France;

KEY WORDS: biomechanics, cladistics, evolutionary radiation, novelty radiation, paleobotany,

EARLY LAND PLANTS 265

Reexamination of exceptionally preserved biotas, notably the Rhynie Chert

creasingly as evolutionary models in their own right, rather than religiously

Four Phases of Plant Evolution

1. The Biochemical Phase characterized the extensive history of life prior to

(Phase 2b). These broadly correspond to the liverwort-dominated “eoem-

3. The Morphological Phase of Bateman (“eutracheophytic” phase sensu 57)

far more effectively.

4. The Behavioral Phase increased exponentially through the Carboniferous

This review concerns primarily the intermediate anatomical and morpho-

LAND PLANT PHYLOGENY

EARLY LAND PLANTS 267

groups (66). Selected character-state transitions between potentially pivotal

rather than monophyletic clades.

EARLY LAND PLANTS 269

bryophyte-like characteristics (e.g. terminal sporangia, columella in Horneo-

EARLY LAND PLANTS 271

PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOMECHANICS

Possibly the earliest upright cylindrical structures among embryophytes were

Extant mosses reflect a transition from a thalloid to an axial growth form

“Protracheophytes” and Rhyniopsids

EARLY LAND PLANTS 273

Both plants relied on the maintenance of turgor to retain an upright posture.

those primitive species of Zosterophyllum that lack hypodermal steromes (121,

ther morphological innovations would have been necessary to colonize water-

EARLY LAND PLANTS 275

cm (basal diameter 7 mm) (123). However, the contribution toward flexural

Early and Middle Devonian

EARLY LAND PLANTS 277

Late Devonian landscapes (17, 102) revealed a range of conditions on vegetated

ecological constraints). Available (albeit limited) evidence indicates that each

CHARACTERS AND PHYLOGENY

EARLY LAND PLANTS 279

highly morphologically divergent, plesiomorphically simple, or secondarily

Constraints on Molecular Phylogenies

The insights gained by applying phylogenetic techniques to the Siluro-Devonian

Constraints on Morphological Phylogenies

EARLY LAND PLANTS 281

interpretations. The pivotal role played by fossils in many plant phylogenies

morphological–anatomical simplicity and the impossibility of direct experi-

INTERPRETING THE SILURO-DEVONIAN

EARLY LAND PLANTS 283

by Late Devonian origins of the “pteridosperms,” sphenopsids, and bona fide

contrasts strongly with a niche-filling adaptive radiation, which also occurs

Environmental Conquests and Ecological Constraints

(relatively uncompetitive) niche (9). In a fully occupied landscape, incumbent

Elusive Key Innovations

EARLY LAND PLANTS 285

pronounced axial gametophyte, terminal gametangia, and well-developed spo-

Summarizing the biomechanical data, developmental processes leading to

EARLY LAND PLANTS 287

niches necessary to form communities that exhibited broadly modern ecological

Visit the Annual Reviews home page at