Final Assignment of MPOB
Final Assignment of MPOB
BEHAVIOUR
Functions of Managers:
Managers just don't go out and haphazardly perform their responsibilities. Good
managers discover how to master five basic functions: planning, organizing,
staffing, leading, and controlling.
Organizing: After a plan is in place, a manager needs to organize her team and
materials according to her plan. Assigning work and granting authority are two
important elements of organizing.
Staffing: After a manager discerns his area's needs, he may decide to beef up
his staffing by recruiting, selecting, training, and developing employees. A
manager in a large organization often works with the company's human
resources department to accomplish this goal.
Leading: A manager needs to do more than just plan, organize, and staff her
team to achieve a goal. She must also lead. Leading involves motivating,
communicating, guiding, and encouraging. It requires the manager to coach,
assist, and problem solve with employees.
Controlling: After the other elements are in place, a manager's job is not
finished. He needs to continuously check results against goals and take any
corrective actions necessary to make sure that his area's plans remain on track.
All managers at all levels of every organization perform these functions, but the
amount of time a manager spends on each one depends on both the level of
management and the specific organization.
A manager wears many hats. Not only is a manager a team leader, but he or she
is also a planner, organizer, cheerleader, coach, problem solver, and decision
maker — all rolled into one. And these are just a few of a manager's roles.
In his classic book, The Nature of Managerial Work, Henry Mintzberg describes
a set of ten roles that a manager fills. These roles fall into three categories:
Although all three categories contain skills essential for managers, their relative
importance tends to vary by level of managerial responsibility.
Top management sets the goals of the organization, evaluates the overall
performance of various departments involved in selection of key
personnel and consults subordinate managers on subjects or problems of
general scope.
Middle level management is responsible for developing departmental
goals and initiate actions that are required to achieve organizational
objectives.
Supervisory management takes charge of day-to-day operations at the
floor level and is involved in preparing detailed short-range plans.
Planner
A Manager has to take a long-term view; indeed, the higher you rise, the further you
will have to look. While a team member will be working towards known and
RAHUL GUPTA, MBAHCS (1ST SEM), SUBJECT CODE-MBOO22, SET-1
Page 4
MANAGEMENT PROCESS AND ORGANIZATIONAL
BEHAVIOUR
established goals, the manager must look further ahead so that these goals are
selected wisely. By thinking about the eventual consequences of different plans, the
manager selects the optimal plan for the team and implements it. By taking account
of the needs not only of the next project but the project after that, the manager
ensures that work is not repeated nor problems tackled too late, and that the
necessary resources are allocated and arranged.
Provider
The Manager has access to information and materials which the team needs. Often
he/she has the authority or influence to acquire things which no one else in the team
could. This role for the manager is important simply because no one else can do the
job; there is some authority which the manager holds uniquely within the team, and
the manager must exercise this to help the team to work.
Protector
The team needs security from the vagaries of less enlightened managers. In any
company, there are short-term excitements which can deflect the work-force from
the important issues. The manager should be there to guard against these and to
protect the team. If a new project emerges which is to be given to your team, you are
responsible for costing it (especially in terms of time) so that your team is not given
an impossible deadline. If someone in your team brings forward a good plan, you
must ensure that it receives a fair hearing and that your team knows and understands
the outcome. If someone is in your team has a problem at work, you have to deal
with it. I believe anyone can be a good manager. It is as much trainable skill as it is
inherent ability; as much science as art. Here are some things that make you a better
manager:
As a person:
• You have confidence in yourself and your abilities. You are happy with
whom you are, but you are still learning and getting better.
• You are something of an extrovert. You don’t have to be the life of the party,
but you can’t be a wallflower. Management is a people skill - it’s not the job for
someone who doesn’t enjoy people.
• You are honest and straight forward. Your success depends heavily on the
trust of others.
• You are an include not an excluder. You bring others into what you do. You
don’t exclude other because they lack certain attributes.
• You have a ‘presence’. Managers must lead. Effective leaders have a quality
about them that makes people notice when they enter a room.
On the job:
• You are consistent, but not rigid; dependable, but can change your mind.
You make decisions, but easily accept input from others.
• You are a little bit crazy. You think out-of-the box. You try new things and
if they fail, you admit the mistake, but don’t apologize for having tried.
• You are not afraid to “do the math”. You make plans and schedules and
work toward them.
• You are nimble and can change plans quickly, but you are not flighty.
• You see information as a tool to be used, not as power to be hoarded.
Below is a list of the types of activities that managers undertake with regard to the
job. Read through the list and for each activity try to think of a specific example
related to your experience as a manager.
A manager:
• Makes forecasts.
• Analyses.
• Thinks creatively and logically.
• Calculates and weighs risks.
• Makes decisions.
• Determines goals.
• Sets priorities.
• Prepares plans.
• Schedules activities.
• Establishes control systems.
• Sets and agrees budgets.
• Monitors progress.
• Exercises control.
• Determines information needs.
• Establishes and uses management information systems.
• Manages his or her time.
• Copes with stress.
• Adjusts to change.
• Develops his or her skills and knowledge.
Having looked at the manager with regard to the job you can now consider activities
that a manager may carry out with regard to the team. Read through the list and for
each activity try to think of a specific example related to your experience as a
manager.
A manager:
Now turn your attention to activities that a manager may carry out with regard to the
organization. Again read through the list and for each activity try to think of a
specific example related to your experience as a manager.
Many of these activities are attributed to senior managers. Don't worry if you are
unable to relate some of these to your current role.
A manager:
effort, and what you learned as a result. Share it with your supervisor, peers and
subordinates.
A. Technical Skills:
Technical skills include knowledge of and proficiency in certain specialized field,
such as engineering, computers, accounting, or manufacturing. These skills are
more important at lower level management since these managers are dealing
directly with employees doing the organizational work. Solid technical skills are
becoming increasingly important, and I don’t see that changing any time soon.
While computers have become easier to use in many ways, the leading edge is
more complicated than ever. This complexity scares many people away from
developing their technical skills, but let’s considers some of the reasons you may
want to go beyond the basics. This skill requires the ability to use a special
proficiency or expertise to perform particular tasks. Accountants, engineers,
market researchers, and computer scientists, as examples, possess technical
skills. Managers acquire these skills initially through formal education and
then further develop them through training and job experience. Technical skills
are most important at lower levels of management. These skills include the
knowledge of and proficiency in activities involving methods, processes and
procedures. This includes the abilities of a manager in using the knowledge, tools,
and techniques of a specific discipline or field such as accounting, engineering,
manufacturing etc. Examples of such skills also include the preparation of
financial statements, the ability to develop a new code for the computer program.
These skills are needed for the first line managers, since they are responsible for
delivering the actual performance. First line managers also spend a considerable
amount of their time in training their subordinates.
2. Save money.
You’ll save money every time you can solve a technical problem on your own
instead of having to hire someone at a high hourly rate. This can add up to
substantial savings over time. You can also save money by taking advantage of low-
cost, high-tech solutions. For example, using VOIP Internet phone service will save
you a bundle over traditional phone service, and it only takes a minor amount of
technical skill to install. I actually disconnected my whole house from the telephone
company’s lines, so I could use all the inside jacks for VOIP.
3. Save time.
You’ll save time by solving technical problems quickly instead of scratching your
head in confusion. There are many technical problems that baffle novices but which
require only a quick fix from someone with adequate technical skills.
4. Prevent problems.
5. Reduce frustration.
I don’t know many geeks who buy their computers at retail stores. It’s a lot smarter
to buy online if you know what to look for. You’ll get better value, higher quality
components, and more control over the final product.
A fun project I did in 2004 was to build my own PC from scratch. I handpicked
each component and ordered everything online. I built the equivalent of a $2000
retail PC for about $900. I used Price Watch to find great deals on all the
Since technology depreciates so rapidly, and since component quality can vary
widely, knowing how to buy great value at a great price is a very practical skill.
With most rapidly advancing components like CPUs, hard drives, and video cards,
there’s a fairly narrow price-performance sweet spot. Spend too little, and you’re
throwing money away on obsolescent goods. Spend too much, and you’re
overpaying for imperceptible performance gains. Decent technical knowledge can
help you target those sweet spots with all your technology purchases, so you get the
best bang per buck.
7. Empower yourself.
I remember thinking how great it was in high school when I began using a decent
word processor while many other students were still using typewriters. Editing was
certainly much easier, so I got more done in less time.
Whenever you want to know something now, you can go online and get the
information in seconds. Sites like Google, Wikipedia, and Wiki How truly place
information at your fingertips, but it still takes a bit of technical skill to craft
intelligent queries when you’re searching for something obscure.
Need to buy a new suit? Want to see what movies are playing near you? Want to
become an early riser? If someone has figured it out, it’s probably online. With an
internet connection at hand, we all become walking Wikipedia’s.
This is one of the coolest benefits of technical know-how. With the right technical
skills, you can build your own income-generating web site. Your computer (or
some online server) will work tirelessly to make you money 24/7. Even if it just
pays for your coffee, that’s still better than buying your own coffee, isn’t it? If it
fails, at least you learned something, and you can certainly try again. But what if it
really works? You might not need a job for the rest of your life. That seems like a
pretty good reason to go for it.
Given how disgustingly cheap technology is, I think it’s silly not to devote at least
one of the millions of machines on this planet to the task of paying your bills. Most
computers are just sitting there idle waiting for something to do, so put some
of those resources to good use. I’m not talking about getting VC money and trying
to make the next Google. My suggestion is to start a simple web business you can
run by yourself in your spare time with no expenses except web hosting (no more
than $20/month).
I’ve been earning income online since 1995, and I love it. It does require some
technical skill to build an income-generating web site, but those skills are highly
learnable, and it’s a lot easier today than it was 10 years ago. (For example, see
How to Make Money from Your Blog). Sure I can write well enough, but without
the technical skills to build traffic, this site would be a ghost town. I do the creative
work, technology handles the grunt work, and visitors benefit from the value
provided. It’s a pretty nice system.
Competence builds confidence. As you develop your technical skills, you’ll feel
more comfortable with all forms of technology. This will encourage you to branch
out and leverage technology even more. You can listen to audio books on your
portable MP3 player, take pictures with your digital camera, and so on. You’ll feel
in control of technology instead of intimidated by it.
The more technical experience you gain, the faster you’ll adapt to new technology.
You may fall behind the curve at some point, but you’ll quickly catch up with a few
days’ research.
B. Human Skills:
Human skills also referred to as human relation skills or interpersonal skills are one’s ability to
work effectively with others on a person-to-person basis and to build up cooperative group
relations to achieve specified objectives. In the group discussion situation, your human skills
will be reflected in your following actions. includes his/her ability to understand other people
and interact effectively with them. Examples of such skills include leading, motivating and
communicating, with subordinates, peers and outsiders. Possession of these skills is essential
for managers, working in all levels. The human skills are also important in creation of an
environment in which people feel secure and free to express their opinions.
A. The basic tenets of human skills are that treat everyone in the group as equal, not inferior, to
you. This must be reflected by your words as well as body language.
B. Have positive attitudes towards fellow candidates. Your positive attitude will not only be
appreciated by other candidates but by evaluators too as people with positive attitudes are
appreciated by everyone. Though each of the candidates is your competitor, do not treat them as
your competitors but treat them as your colleagues and have respect for them and their views.
C. When you listen to views of anyone, evaluate these empathetically, that is, putting yourself
in his position so that you can understand why he has those views. If you look at the views from
this perspective, you can appreciate the views in a better way though it is not necessary that you
agree with others’ views either totally or partially.
D. Show emotional maturity while interacting with others. If someone criticizes yours views, do
not take it on personal basis but take it on professional basis and keep yourself cool and do not
lose your temper.
E. If someone’s view seems to be absurd or irrelevant to the topic, do not let him down by
saying such words which are not in accordance to the etiquette of gentlemen.
C. Conceptual Skills:
Conceptual skills refer to the ability to form concepts. These are various levels of
cognitive (mainly verbal) abstractions beginning with the exercise of detonating
simple physical objects (e.g. a cat) to higher level abstractions which go beyond the
physically visible (e.g. truth). In everyday use, we also say someone has conceptual
skills that are able to look at patterns of objects and events and label them (with a
concept word), which identifies, organizes and makes sense of the pattern, trend, or
configuration of objects or events, with a putative explanatory intent.
Conceptual Skills are the skills managers must have to think and to conceptualize
about abstract and complex situations. Using these skills, managers must be able to
see the organization as a whole, understand the relationships among various
subunits, and visualize how the organization fits into its broader environment. These
skills are most important at the top level management. This refers to the ability to
think and conceptualize abstract situations. These abilities are required for making
complex decisions. Such skills are inclusive of the diagnostic skill, which enables an
understanding of the `cause-effect' relationship. Further, it helps to see the situation
as a whole, as well as in parts. (i.e., individually). These skills are essential for the
top management as they have to understand how the various parts of the
organization relate to one another and associate the organization with the external
environment.
D. Design Skills:
It enables a manager to handle and solve any kind of unforeseen problems that
may crop up in the organization. Top management should posses design skills, in
plenty. It is basically their job to handle/tackle any unforeseen consequences that
may occur in the organization. Such problems could arise due to internal factors or
external factors and/or both.
B) Approaches to negotiation:
Negotiation typically manifests itself with trained negotiator acting on behalf
of a particular organization or position. It can be compared to mediation where a
disinterested third party listens to each side’s arguments and attempts to help craft
an agreement between the parties. It is also related to arbitration which, as with a
legal proceeding, both sides make an argument as to the merits of their "case" and
then the arbitrator decides the outcome for both parties.
2. Commercial Negotiations:
Such types of negotiations are conducted with external parties. The driving
forces behind such negotiations are usually financial gains. They are based on a
give-and-take relationship. Commercial negotiations successfully end up into
contracts. It relates to foregoing of one resource to get the other.
3. Legal Negotiations
These negotiations are usually formal and legally binding. Disputes over
precedents can become as significant as the main issue. They are also contractual in
nature and relate to gaining legal ground.
IS NEGOTIATION NECESSARY?
E) Process of Negotiation:
There are eight stages in the process of negotiation.
This is a unique combination framework that puts together the best of many other
approaches to negotiation. It is particularly suited to more complex, higher-value
and slower negotiations.
Note also that in practice, you may find variations on these, for example there may
be loops back to previous stages, stages overlapping, stages running parallel and
even out of order.
The bottom line is to use what works. This process is intended to help you
negotiate, but do not use it blindly. It is not magic and is not a substitute for
thinking. If something does not seem to be working, try to figure out why and
either fix the problem or try something else. Although there are commonalities
across negotiations, each one is different and the greatest skill is to be able to read
the situation in the moment and adapt as appropriate.
1) Prepare:
The overall action in preparation is to be ready for every stage of the actual
negotiation. In preparation, you may walk through many scenarios and prepare for
many eventualities.
What will be your opening offer? If it is too high, you might insult the other
person or frighten then off. If it is too low, you may lose out. To do this, you may
need to consider the agreement zones that might occur. Your opening offer will be
based on a combination of the range of 'reasonable value' of the things that you
want, the situation of the other person and the dynamics that you want to cause
within the negotiation itself. In practice, if the other person makes an opening offer
first, which can be a useful action, you may revise your opening offer.
Nevertheless, it is still worth deciding where you will start.
Look at everything you have at your disposal that you can bring to bear on this
negotiation. What do you have that the other person might value? When buying
something, what extra money could you bring to the table? Do you have people
you can call on for support? Can you use time in any way? Finding variables is a
key activity that can significantly increase your options. Look to the variables in
the resources that you have. What could you increase or decrease? What could be
expanded? What could be exchanged?
When you know where to start, you can now develop the concession strategy,
whereby you will make exchanges in order to gain final agreement. This will
include the use of variables where you can made trades in many different areas.
2) Open:
The purpose of the opening stage of negotiation is to position yourself and your
needs, letting the other person know what you want, both as a outcome and in the
process of negotiation.
right from the start. If you want to negotiate collaboratively, then you might start
with an agreeable and friendly greeting, whilst for a competitive approach, you
may take a strongly assertive or even aggressive position in order to intimidate and
dominate the other person.
Be confident
Explain what you need as a result of the contextual situation. Show that your need
is real and legitimate. Make it clear what you want from the other person. In some
situations this is clear and simple, whilst in others you may have multiple needs,
for example if you are negotiating an employment contract then there may be
many terms and conditions to consider.
When it is your turn to listen, do so actively. Listening is not just being polite
-- there are many reasons why you should listen, especially in a negotiation.
Showing respect and interest will get them to give you more information, and in
negotiation information really is power. The first stage of listening is, basically, to
listen without interruption. The only interaction you have with them is active
listening methods that encourage them to talk. You can pause them to paraphrase
back what you have heard and you can ask them for clarification, but keep such
interruptions to a minimum.
When they have made their case, you can then ask deeper questions to probe
for further information. If they have left out areas that you might have expected
them to cover, it may be because they are not comfortable talking about this.
Sustain a gentle approach of interest, curiosity and general inquiry. If you make it
sound like an audit or inquisition, then they may well stop talking. Your goal is to
make it easy for them to tell you more about their situation.
Think about the person with whom you are negotiating. Listen to the inner
person, discovering their beliefs, values, preferences and schemas. Find out what
power they have and how they might use it.
Understand how they prefer to satisfy their needs. Identify their interests and goals
that underlie the positions they are taking. When you know what is driving them,
you will have many alternative routes to satisfying them.
3) Argue:
In the argument stage, the serious exchange of views begins. This can be
uncomfortable as the goal is to strengthen your own position whilst weakening the
other person's position. Note that in a collaborative negotiation, the argument may
be gentile and polite to the point where it does not seem like argument.
Nevertheless, the points may still apply to some extent.
If they are claiming that something they have is of value to you, you can show
how what is on offer is not that important. This is relatively easy to do as only you
determine value of what you might get.
When they make assertions, question them more closely. Change probabilities.
Show how things asserted as always true are only sometimes true. Probe for the
evidence behind asserted truths. Test the reasoning they are using. Then use what
you discover to undermine what they are proposing as unquestionable truth.
When they tell of the things that they want from the negotiation and you would
find it difficult to give them this, then show how they cannot possibly get these or
otherwise reduce what they will ask for. Show how requirements are not
legitimate. Indicate how they can get what they want elsewhere. Hint that what
they want is not yours to give.
Where you have stated something as true in your opening argument, add
rationality and cause. Use clear forms of reasoning that show how you are
speaking the whole truth, and that anything else is falsehood. Demonstrate
objective evidence that proves your case. Show your impartiality by considering
the (weakened) arguments against your case.
4) Explore:
So far, no agreements have been made, and early positioning may have
made the way forward difficult to see. Having established what you each want,
however, you can now move towards one another, seeking a way forward. It is
generally a mistake to go fast during a negotiation and taking time to explore can
pay back significantly later. Exploration not only gains you more information
about the other person and their needs, it also builds the relationship between you,
making it easy to reach agreement.
In many negotiations it can be surprising how much both parties may agree. It
is easy for areas of difference to overshadow that the people involved are not that
different after all.
Particularly when you are far apart, a good first step in getting together is to
find those things where you agree with the other person. Finding agreement with
the other person demonstrates similarity and hence creates bonding with them.
This may also be done during earlier stages.
When you are negotiating, the focus on what you want as opposed to what they
want can make it seem like you are miles apart, when in fact you may be quite
near to an equitable solution. Finding areas of agreement helps to shrink the areas
where you have to negotiate. By saying 'we agree on this and that', you can find
the specific areas where negotiation is needed.
When you know where you agree, then finding where you really disagree is
easier. The fact that you agree makes it easier to work together and accept areas of
difference.
A common source of difference is that is not always clear is that people are driven
by fundamentally different goals.
5) Signal:
A signal is a subtle indicator to the other person that you may be willing to
negotiate. This is seldom done openly as this would contradict the opening and
argument. Signaling is not making a verbal statement and effectively saves face,
providing an excuse to subsequently move from your original position (or to
backtrack if the other person is not ready to collaborate).
Qualify statements
Add qualifiers that indicate how you might just be persuaded to do something
that you would not normally do or that you may agree to something other than
what you originally wanted.
• Indicate possibility
Use words that indicate possibility, opening out the potential for a different
future that you may have painted in your opening statement.
Open body language sends even more subtle signals of readiness, with
indications of welcome (such as open arms) and relaxed, smiling face. Body
signaling can be enhanced by starting with closed body language and then moving
to an open position at the same time that you use verbal signaling. Use gestures
that move in time with your signals. Match the other person's movements to show
empathy.
When you have signaled to the other person, the next step is to wait for them to
signal in return. Watch their face when you signal. Are there signs of hope
appearing? Do they seem to have recognized that you have gone from arguing
your case towards moving towards them? Also watch their body language. When
you signal, does their stance change? When you move from matching their body
language to a more open position, do they follow you?
Listen for their verbal signals. Hear the tone of voice that they use. Is it more
relaxed? Are they using qualifiers and indicating possibility?
Do not concede
If they do not signal, it can be tempting to try something more overt, such as
conceding on something. It can seem that they are blind to signals and if you move
to concession, then they will get this signal and concede in return. But what you
have actually done by this is to show that if you make a move and they do not
reciprocate, then you will give something more. This is simply encouragement for
them to wait for more concessions.
When they signal in return (or maybe they signaled first), respond by opening
your body language further and responding with a further encouraging signal.
Show that you approve of their movement by rewarding them with more attention
and acceptance.
6) Package:
RAHUL GUPTA, MBAHCS (1ST SEM), SUBJECT CODE-MBOO22, SET-1
Page 29
MANAGEMENT PROCESS AND ORGANIZATIONAL
BEHAVIOUR
In this stage, the goal is to build potential solutions. The final agreement is not yet
being hammered out and you are still dealing in possibilities. By sustaining an
atmosphere of openness, you make it possible for both you and them to consider
alternatives exchanges without feeling obliged to complete the exchange.
In putting together potential agreements, start by looking for things that you
can exchange and where they might concede to you.
Trade in variables:
When looking for things to exchange, find the variables of the things in which you
are dealing. If you are talking about action, consider when and where it will occur.
If you are talking about money, consider who pays what to whom when and how
often. If you are dealing in physical items, consider size, quantity, weight and
other attributes.
Your elegant negotiable are those things that you have that you do not value
very highly, but the other person finds particularly attractive. They are thus easy
for you to give away but are valued by the other person. The danger with elegant
negotiable is that you give them away without realizing that you can use them to
get something valuable in exchange. This is one reason why you should do lots of
listening before diving into making trades.
Use the Columbus technique and Socratic questioning to draw them out. Help
them understand variables and elegant negotiable. Support them in problem-
solving, clarifying the problem on which you are working together, identifying
causes and why things have happened, finding focus for resolution and creatively
identifying possible solutions.
7) Close:
RAHUL GUPTA, MBAHCS (1ST SEM), SUBJECT CODE-MBOO22, SET-1
Page 30
MANAGEMENT PROCESS AND ORGANIZATIONAL
BEHAVIOUR
Move to closure
As your packaging reaches a complete solution, you can move towards the idea
of closing on a final deal.
Show your own readiness by using signals to indicate that you want to reach
agreement. Use words like 'right' and 'ok'. Use ready body language that aligns
with your words. Watch their response, and if they signal in return, move further
towards closure.
Attempt closure
When things seem ready, you can use a trial close to nudge the other person
closer to agreement. If they do not seem ready, probe for reasons and return to
packaging or handle objections as appropriate.
The realization of impending closure can cause people to panic in case they
have forgotten something. This may occur as sudden appearance of objections and
other reasons why they might not want to complete the deal. You can use
objection-handling techniques to manage such situations.
Tricky tactics such as the quivering quill may be used just before the close as
the other person attempts to squeeze a few more drops of blood out of you. Handle
opposition such as this with professional aplomb, showing that you are immune to
deception or coercion.
The final step of closure is to confirm the agreement and sign on the dotted
line. 'It's not over until the fat lady sings' is a common saying. In negotiation, it is
not over until the ink is dry and the exchange has irrevocably been made.
Shake hands
Although you may not literally shake hands, it can be a very effective thing to
do at the point of agreement. It symbolizes the closure and is such a powerful
social symbol in many different cultures that the other side will think twice about
backing out.
8) Sustain:
When the deal is closed and seems to be complete, the end may not yet be in sight.
Many negotiations have a future element, where the main agreement is for future
action. 'There's many a slip twixt cup and lip', as they say, and an earlier
commitment might not be delivered as promised.
Sustaining commitment is thus about making sure that people stay closed and that
what was agreed in the Close stage stays agreed and gets delivered as promised.
• Evidence stream: Show them time and again that the change is
happening.
• Golden handcuffs: Keep key people with delayed rewards.
• Involvement: Give them an important role.
• Reward alignment: Align rewards with desired behaviors.
• Rites of passage: Use formal rituals to confirm change.
Remember Kano's needs: deliver basic needs solidly, performance needs carefully,
and then add icing to the cake with some excitement needs. These need not (and
should not) be over the top. The formula is 'delight = expectation + 1'. If you
deliver just a little more than is expected, you can create a very happy and loyal
customer. 'Under-promise and over-deliver' is an effective motto.
Renegotiate as necessary
If the situation changes and the agreement are really not worth keeping in its
current form, then rather than pull out without saying anything, it is better to go
and talk to the other party. Where possible and appropriate, re-negotiation the deal,
sealing commitment in a newer, more appropriate agreement. If the other person
also benefits from this, they will be doubly committed to the new arrangements.
B) Pavlov's experiment:
In his initial experiment, Pavlov used a metronome to call the dogs to their food and,
after a few repetitions, the dogs started to salivate in response to the metronome.
C) Types:
Forward conditioning:
Diagram representing forward conditioning. The time interval increases from left to
right.
During forward conditioning the onset of the CS precedes the onset of the US. Two
common forms of forward conditioning are delay and trace conditioning.
Delay Conditioning:
• Trace conditioning:
Simultaneous conditioning:
Backward conditioning:
Temporal conditioning:
Unpaired conditioning:
The CS and US are not presented together. Usually they are presented as
independent trials that are separated by a variable, or pseudo-random, interval. This
procedure is used to study non-associative behavioral responses, such as
sensitization.
CS-alone extinction:
The CS is presented in the absence of the US. This procedure is usually done
after the CR has been acquired through Forward conditioning training. Eventually,
the CR frequency is reduced to pre-training levels.
D) Procedure variations:
In this procedure, two CSs and one US are typically used. The CSs may be the
same modality (such as lights of different intensity), or they may be different
modalities (such as auditory CS and visual CS). In this procedure, one of the CSs is
designated CS+ and its presentation is always followed by the US. The other CS is
designated CS- and its presentation is never followed by the US. After a number of
trials, the organism learns to discriminate CS+ trials and CS- trials such that CRs are
only observed on CS+ trials. During Reversal Training, the CS+ and CS- are
reversed and subjects learn to suppress responding to the previous CS+ and show
CRs to the previous CS-.
This is a discrimination procedure in which two different CSs are used to signal
two different interstimulus intervals. For example, a dim light may be presented 30
seconds before a US, while a very bright light is presented 2 minutes before the US.
Using this technique, organisms can learn to perform CRs that are appropriately
timed for the two distinct CSs.
Phase 1:
A CS (CS+) is not paired with a US until asymptotic CR levels are reached.
Phase 2:
CS+/US trials are continued, but interspersed with trials on which the CS+ in
compound with a second CS, but not with the US (i.e., CS+/CS- trials).
Typically, organisms show CRs on CS+/US trials, but suppress responding
on CS+/CS- trials.
Phase 3:
In this retention test, the previous CS- is paired with the US. If conditioned
inhibition has occurred, the rate of acquisition to the previous CS- should be
impaired relative to organisms that did not experience Phase 2.
Blocking:
Phase 1:
A CS (CS1) is paired with a US.
Phase 2:
A compound CS (CS1+CS2) is paired with a US.
Test:
A separate test for each CS (CS1 and CS2) is performed. The blocking effect
is observed in a lack of conditioned response to CS2, suggesting that the first
phase of training blocked the acquisition of the second CS
valuable. In the United States, for example, values might include material
comfort, wealth, competition, individualism or religiosity.
• The values of a society can often be identified by noting which people
receive honor or respect. In the US, for example, professional athletes are
honored (in the form of monetary payment) more than college professors, in
part because the society respects personal values such as physical activity,
fitness, and competitiveness more than mental activity and education. This
may also be the case because the society takes its education for granted and
repays its teachers with non-tangible honors of relatively equal value with
that of the athlete.
• Surveys show that voters in the United States would be reluctant to elect an
atheist as a president, suggesting that belief in God is a value. There is a
difference between values clarification and cognitive moral education.
Values clarification is, "helping people clarify what their lives are for and
what is worth working for. Students are encouraged to define their own
values and understand others' values. Cognitive moral education is based on
the belief that students should learn to value things like democracy and
justice as their moral reasoning develops.
• Values are related to the norms of a culture, but they are more general and
abstract than norms. Norms are rules for behavior in specific situations,
while values identify what should be judged as good or evil. Flying the
national flag on a holiday is a norm, but it reflects the value of patriotism.
Wearing dark clothing and appearing solemn are normative behaviors at a
funeral. They reflect the values of respect and support of friends and family.
Different cultures reflect different values.
• Over the last three decades, traditional-age college students have shown an
increased interest in personal well-being and a decreased interest in the
welfare of others. Values seemed to have changed, affecting the beliefs, and
attitudes of college students.
• Members take part in a culture even if each member's personal values do not
entirely agree with some of the normative values sanctioned in the culture.
This reflects an individual's ability to synthesize and extract aspects valuable
to them from the multiple subcultures they belong to.
• If a group member expresses a value that is in serious conflict with the
group's norms, the group's authority may carry out various ways of
encouraging conformity or stigmatizing the non-conforming behavior of its
members. For example, imprisonment can result from conflict with social
norms that have been established as law.
Locus of control refers to the extent to which individuals believe that they
can control events that affect them. Individuals with a high internal locus of control
believe that events result primarily from their own behavior and actions. Those with
a high external locus of control believe that powerful others, fate, or chance
primarily determine events. Those with a high internal locus of control have better
control of their behavior, tend to exhibit more political behaviors, and are more
likely to attempt to influence other people than those with a high external locus of
control; they are more likely to assume that their efforts will be successful. They are
more active in seeking information and knowledge concerning their situation.
Rotter (1975) cautioned that internality and externality represent two ends of
a continuum, not an either/or typology. Internals tend to attribute outcomes of
events to their own control. Externals attribute outcomes of events to external
circumstances. For example, college students with a strong internal locus of control
may believe that their grades were achieved through their own abilities and efforts,
whereas those with a strong external locus of control may believe that their grades
are the result of good or bad luck, or to a professor who designs bad tests or grades
capriciously; hence, they are less likely to expect that their own efforts will result in
success and are therefore less likely to work hard for high grades.
others and are chance-based, must be separated. Weiner's early work in the 1970s,
suggested that, more-or-less orthogonal to the internality-externality dimension, we
should also consider differences between those who attribute to stable causes, and
those who attribute to unstable causes. This meant that attributions could be to
ability (an internal stable cause), effort (an internal unstable cause), task difficulty
(an external stable cause) or luck (an external, unstable cause).
Locus of control's most famous application has probably been in the area of
health psychology, largely thanks to the work of Kenneth Wallston. Scales to
measure locus of control in the health domain are reviewed by Furnham and Steele
(1993). The most famous of these would be the Health Locus of Control Scale and
the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scale, or MHLC (Wallston,
Wallston, & DeVellis, 1976; Wallston, Wallston, Kaplan & Maides, 1976). The
latter scale is based on the idea, echoing Levenson's earlier work, that health may be
attributed to three possible outcomes - internal factors, such as self-determination of
a healthy lifestyle, powerful others, such as one's doctor, or luck. Some of the scales
reviewed by Furnham and Steele (1993) relate to health in more specific domains,
such as obesity (for example, Saltzer's ) (1982) Weight Locus of Control Scale or
Stotland and Zuroff's (1990) Dieting Beliefs Scale), or mental health (such as Wood
and Letak's (1982) Mental Health Locus of Control Scale or the Depression Locus
of Control Scale of Whiteman, Desmond and Price, 1987)and cancer (the Cancer
Locus of Control Scale of Pruyn et alia, 1988).
They note similar ambiguity for data on the relationship between internal
health locus of control and other health-related behaviours, such as breast self-
examination, weight control and preventative health behaviours.
Norman and Bennett argue that a stronger relationship is found when health
locus of control is assessed for specific domains than when general measures of
locus of control are taken. ("Overall, studies using behaviour-specific health locus
scales have tended to produce more positive results (Lefcourt, 1991). Moreover,
these scales have been found to be more predictive of general behaviour than more
general scales, such as the MHLC scale" (Norman & Bennett, 1995). Norman and
Bennett cite several studies which have used health-related locus of control scales in
specific domains, including smoking cessation (Georgio & Bradley, 1992), diabetes
(Ferraro, Price, Desmond & Roberts, 1987), tablet-treated diabetes (Bradley, Lewis,
Jennings & Ward, 1990), hypertension (Stantion, 1987), arthritis (Nicasio et al.,
1985), cancer (Pruyn et al., 1988) and heart and lung disease (Allison, 1987). They
also argue that health locus of control is better at predicting health-related behaviour
if studied in conjunction with health value, i.e. the value people attach to their
health, suggesting that health value is an important moderator variable in the health-
locus of control relationship. For example, Weiss and Larsen (1990) (cited in
Norman & Bennett, 1995) found increased relationship between internal health
locus of control and health when health value was assessed. Despite the importance
that Norman and Bennet (1995) attach to use of specific measures of locus of
control, there are still some general textbooks on personality, such as Maltby, Day
and Macaskill (2007), which continue to cite studies linking internal locus of control
with improved physical health, mental health and quality of life in people
undergoing conditions as diverse as HIV, migraines, diabetes, kidney disease and
epilepsy (Maltby, Day & Macaskill, 2007).
Other fields to which the concept has been applied include industrial and
organizational psychology, sports psychology, educational psychology and the
psychology of religion. Richard Kahoe has published celebrated work in the latter
field, suggesting that intrinsic religious orientation correlates positively, extrinsic
religious orientation correlates negatively, with internal locus.[6] Of relevance to both
health psychology and the psychology of religion is the work prepared by Holt,
Clark, Kreuter and Rubio (2003), in preparing a questionnaire to assess spiritual
health locus of control. These authors distinguished between an active spiritual
health locus of control orientation, in which "God empowers the individual to take
healthy actions"[7] and a more passive spiritual health locus of control orientation,
where people leave everything to God in the care of their own health.
is sometimes assumed that as people age, they will become less internal and
more external, but data here have been ambiguous. Longitudinal data collected by
Gatz and Karel (cited in Johnson et al., 2004 imply that internality may increase up
to middle age, and thereafter decrease. Noting the ambiguity of data in this area,
Aldwin and Gilmer (2004) cite Lachman's claim that locus of control is ambiguous.
Indeed, there is evidence here that changes in locus of control in later life relate
more visibly to increased externality, rather than reduced internality, if the two
concepts are taken to be orthogonal. Evidence cited by Schultz and Schultz (2005),
for example Heckhausen and Schulz (1995) or Ryckman and Malikosi, 1975 (cited
in Schultz & Schultz, 2005), suggests that locus of control increases in internality up
until middle age. These authors also note that attempts to control the environment
become more pronounced between the age of eight and fourteen. For more on the
relationship between locus of control and coping with the demands of later life, see
the article on aging.
As Schultz and Schultz (2005) point out, significant differences in locus of control
have not been found for adults in a U.S. population. However, these authors also
note that there may be specific sex-based differences for specific categories of item
to assess locus of control - for example, they cite evidence that men may have a
greater internal locus for questions related to academic achievement (Strickland &
Haley, 1980; cited in Schultz & Schultz, 2005).
7. Self-efficacy:
Locus of control has been a concept which has certainly generated much research in
psychology, in a variety of areas. Usefulness of the construct can be seen in its
applicability to fields such as educational psychology, health psychology or clinical
psychology. There will probably continue to be debate about whether specific or
more global measures of locus of control will prove to be more useful. Careful
distinctions should also be made between locus of control (a concept linked with
expectancies about the future) and attribution style (a concept linked with
explanations for past outcomes), or between locus of control and concepts such as
self-efficacy. The importance of locus of control as a topic in psychology is likely to
remain quite central for many years.
B) Machiavellianism
1) Introduction”
2) In Political Thought:
3) In Psychology: