Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 36

IGES-ICS CDM PDD TRAINING WORKSHOP

January 24- 26, 2005, MMLDC Antipolo city

PREPARATION OF PDD:

INTERCO
RICE HUSK POWER PLANT PROJECT
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT

CONTENTS:

A. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT ACTIVITY


B. APPLICATION OF A BASELINE METHODOLOGY
C. DURATION OF THE PROJECT ACTIVITY/CREDITING
PERIOD
D. APPLICATION OF A MONITORING METHODOLOGY AND
PLAN
E. ESTIMATION OF GHG EMISSIONS BY SOURCES
F. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
G. STAKEHOLDERS’ COMMENTS (to follow)
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT

A. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT


ACTIVITY
A. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
ACTIVITY
A.1. TITLE OF THE PROJECT ACTIVITY:

INTERCO 5 MW Rice Husk Fired Power Plant


A. GENERAL DESCRIPTION
OF PROJECT ACTIVITY
A.2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ACTIVITY

PURPOSE:

The Project is designed to use rice husk for power generation


that would otherwise be burned in the open air or left to decay.

Project is expected to bring the following benefits:


– Improve the quality of power by minimizing distribution loss
– Lower the cost of power to the entire rice milling operation (80
rice mills) within the estate
– Lower the cost of rice husk disposal
A. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
ACTIVITY
A.2.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ACTIVITY

CONTRIBUTION TO SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT:

USE OF CHEAP INDIGENOUS RENEWABLE ENERGY


SOURCES IN AN IMPORT ENERGY-DEPENDENT COUNTRY

USE OF ENVIRONMENT-FRIENDLY POWER GENERATION


TECHNOLOGY

REDUCTION OF AIR POLLUTION AND SOLID WASTE IN THE


COUNTRYSIDE
A. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
ACTIVITY

A.3. PROJECT PARTICIPANTS:

PROPONENT: INTERCO
CDM ADVISER: NONE YET
A.4. TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE
PROJECT ACTIVITY:

LOCATION OF PROJECT ACTIVITY:

1.2 HECTARE LOCATED WITHIN


INTERCITY INDUSTRIAL ESTATE

MC ARTHUR HIWAY, BRGY. SAN JUAN, BALAGTAS,


BULACAN, PHILIPPINES
A.4. TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE
PROJECT ACTIVITY:

A.4.2 CATEGORIES OF PROJECT ACTIVITY

Small scale CDM Type 1 – Renewable energy projects:


I.A. Electricity generation by the user
A.4. TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT
ACTIVITY

A.4.3 TECHNOLOGY TO BE EMPLOYED

Boiler and steam generation system


Maker: Yoshimine Co. Pte. of Japan
Model: Water Tube Boiler H-900
Steam Evaporation: 30,000 kg/hr at MCR
Steam pressure: approx. 42 kg.cm2G
Boiler efficiency: 83.0% Flue gas loss measure
Draft / Anti pollution system: Balance draft electrostatic precipitator – particles less than 100 mg/m3

Steam turbine for generator


Maker: Shinko Ind. Ltd. of Japan
Model: SHINKO DNGG62
Output: 5,000 kW x 8,119 / 1,800 rpm
Type: Horizontal Rateau 6-stages, condensing type with reduction gear, forced lubrication system
A.4. TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE
PROJECT ACTIVITY:

A.4.4 EXPLANATION ON HOW PROPOSED CDM PROJECT


ACTIVITY CAN REDUCE GHG EMISSIONS

CDM PROJECT CAN REDUCE GHG EMISSIONS BY:


DISPLACEMENT OF ELECTRICTY DEMAND FROM ELECTRICITY
GRID PRIMARILY PRODUCED FROM FOSSIL FUEL WITH
ELECTRICITY PRODUCED FROM RICE HUSK FIRED GENERATOR

PREVENTION OF UNCONTROLLED OPEN AIR BURNING OF RICE


HUSK AS A MODE OF DISPOSAL BY DIVERTING BIOMASS WASTE
MATERIAL TO BOILER FUEL APPLICATION

LESSEN TRAVEL DISTANCE OF TRUCKS DISPOSING RICE HUSK


PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT

B. APPLICATION OF A BASELINE
METHODOLOGY
B. APPLICATION OF A BASELINE METHODOLOGY

B.1: TITLE AND REFERENCE OF THE APPROVED


BASELINE METHODOLOGY

Small scale CDM Type 1 – Renewable energy projects:


I.A. Electricity generation by the user
B. APPLICATION OF A BASELINE METHODOLOGY

B.2: DESCRIPTION OF HOW THE METHODOLOGY IS APPLIED IN THE


CONTEXT OF PROJECT ACTIVITY

STEPS IN METHODOLOGY APPLIED TO PROJECT TO ASCERTAIN THAT


IT IS ADDITIONAL

1. PROJECT IS DIFFERENT TO BAU PRIMARILY DUE TO


INVESTMENT AND TECHNOLOGY BARRIERS

2. LARGE SURPLUS SUPPLY AVAILABILITY OF BIOMASS

3. THE PLANT SIZE IS LESS THAN 15MW, WHICH IS CONSIDERED


SMALL SCALE TO AFFECT THE BASELOAD OF LUZON GRID
B. APPLICATION OF A BASELINE METHODOLOGY

B.3: DESCRIPTION OF HOW THE ANTHROPOGENIC GHG


EMISSIONS BY SOURCES ARE REDUCED BELOW THOSE
THAT WOULD HAVE OCCURRED IN THE ABSENCE OF A
CDM PROJECT ACTIVITY

THIS PROJECT INTRODUCES STATE OF THE ART TECHNOLOGY TO THE


COUNTRY THAT PROVIDES ENERGY FROM UNUSED BIOMASS AS FUEL

THIS PROJECT IS ADDITIONAL SINCE ELECTRICITY FROM RICE HUSK-


FIRED POWER PLANT IS NOT LOCALLY AVAILABLE DUE TO ABSENCE OF
TECHNOLOGY

IMPORTED TECHNOLOGY IS NOT YET ECONOMICALLY VIABLE.

IT PRODUCES LESS CO2 EMISSIONS DUE TO DISPLACEMENT OF FOSSIL


FUEL FOR HEAT AND POWER GENERATION IN THE BASELINE SCENARIO
WITH BIOMASS FUEL IN THE PROJECT SCENARIO. BIOMASS IS CO2
NEUTRAL
B. APPLICATION OF A BASELINE METHODOLOGY

B.4: DESCRIPTION OF HOW THE DEFINITION OF THE PROJECT


BOUNDARY RELATED TO THE BASELINE METHODOLOGY
SELECTED IS APPLIED TO THE PROJECT ACTIVITY

PER METHODOLOGY, THE PHYSICAL DELINEATION IS


DEFINED AS THE INTERCITY INDUSTRIAL ESTATE WHICH
INCLUDES THE INTERCO POWER PLANT SITE. ALL EMISSION
SOURCES INCLUDED IN THE PROJECT BOUNDARY ARE
WITHIN THE INTERCITY INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
B. APPLICATION OF A BASELINE METHODOLOGY

B.5: DETAILED BASELINE INFORMATION, INCLUDING THE DATE OF


COMPLETION OF THE BASELINE STUDY AND THE NAME OF
PERSON(S)/ENTITY(IES) DETERMINING THE BASELINE

DETAILS OF BASELINE INFORMATION : REFER TO FEASIBILITY STUDY


DATE OF COMPETING THE FINAL DRAFT OF THIS BASELINE SECTION
DD/MM/YYYY

NAME OF PERSONS/ENTITY DETERMINING THE BASELINE

NAME OF ORGANIZATIION
AND ADDRESS
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT

C. DURATION OF THE PROJECT ACTIVITY/


CREDITING PERIOD
C. DURATION OF THE PROJECT ACTIVITY/
CREDITING PERIOD

C.1. DURATION OF THE PROJECT ACTIVITY

25 YEARS

C.1.1 STARTING DATE OF THE PROJECT ACTIVITY

DECEMBER 1, 2006

C..1.2. EXPECTED OPERATIONAL LIFETIME OF THE PROJECT


ACTIVITY

MINIMUM 25 YEARS
C. DURATION OF THE PROJECT ACTIVITY/
CREDITING PERIOD

C.2. CHOICE OF CREDITING PERIOD AND RELATED INFORMATION

C.2.1. RENEWABLE CREDITING PERIOD ( MAX. 7 YEARS )

STARTING DATE OF FIRST CREDITING PERIOD: 2006

LENGTH OF FIRST CREDITING PERIOD: DD/MM/YYYY

C.2.2 FIXED CREDITING PERIOD

STARTING DATE: DD/MM/YYYY

LENGTH: ? YEARS
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT

D. APPLICATION OF A MONITORING
METHODOLOGY AND PLAN
D. APPLICATION OF A MONITORING
METHODOLOGY AND PLAN

D.1 NAME AND REFERENCE OF APPROVED MONITORING


METHODOLOGY APPLIED TO THE PROJECT ACIVITY

Small scale CDM Type 1 – Renewable energy projects:


I.A. Electricity generation by the user
D. APPLICATION OF A MONITORING
METHODOLOGY AND PLAN

D.2. JUSTIFICATION OF THE CHOICE OF THE


METHODOLOGY AND WHY IT IS APPLICABLE TO THE
PROJECT ACTIVITY

THE CHOICE OF METHODOLOGY IS JUSTIFIED SINCE THE PROPOSED PROJECT


ACTIVITY AND THE CONTEXT OF PROJECT ACTIVITY MEET THE CONDITIONS UNDER
WHICH THE METHODOLOGY IS APLLICABLE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING:

1. PROJECT ACTIVITY INVOLVES ELECTRICITY GENERATION


UTILIZING RICE HUSK DUE FOR OPEN AIR BURNING

2. HAVE ACCESS TO ABUNDANT SUPPLY OF BIOMASS

3. PROPOSED POWER GENERATION PROJECT IS NOT CONSIDERED A


BUSINESS AS USUAL SCENARIO

4. THE PROJECT IS TOO SMALL TO HAVE IMPACT ON PLANS FOR


CONSTRUCTION OF NEW POWER PLANTS
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT

D.2.1. OPTION 1: MONITORING OF THE


EMISSIONS IN THE PROJECT SCENARIO
AND BASELINE SCENARIO
D.2.1. MONITORING OF THE EMISSIONS IN
THE PROJECT SCENARIO AND BASELINE
SCENARIO

MONITORING EMISSIONS IN THE


PROJECT SCENARIO:

DATA COLLECTION AND ARCHIVING

APPLICABLE EQUATIONS
D.2.1.1 DATA TO BE COLLECTED IN ORDER TO
MONITOR EMISSIONS FROM THE BASE LINE ACTIVITY
AND HOW THESE DATA WILL BE ARCHIVED

ELECTRICITY
GRID
28,350 t CO2

DIESEL FOR TOTAL BASELINE


TRANSPORT EMISSIONS
(52.62 t CO2e, not 28,350
claimed) t CO2EQUIV. /YR

RICE HUSK OPEN


AIR BURNING
(1,437.4 t CO2, not
claimed)
D.2.1.1 DATA TO BE COLLECTED IN ORDER TO
MONITOR EMISSIONS FROM THE PROJECT ACTIVITY
AND HOW THESE DATA WILL BE ARCHIVED

RICE HUSK BOILER


23,762 t/yr
(336 TJ)

RICE HUSK TRANSPORT


TO GENERATION PLANT
1 km
TOTAL PROJECT
EMISSIONS
RICE HUSK TRANSPORT
WITHIN THE PLANT
Fuel consumed

AUXILIARY FUEL FOR


START-UP
Fuel Consumed
D.2.1.1 DATA TO BE COLLECTED IN ORDER TO MONITOR
EMISSIONS FROM THE BASE LINE & PROJECT ACTIVITY AND
HOW THESE DATA WILL BE ARCHIVED
Data Data Data Measured (m), Recording Proportion of data Archive as paper How long is
Type Variable Unit calculated (c) frequency to be monitored or electronic? archived data
or estimated (e) kept?
Baseline Quan Actual Mwh m monthly 100% electronic minimum of two
power years after last
generation issuance of
CERs
Project Quan Amount of Tons m As per 100% electronic minimum of two
rice husk delivery years after last
delivered issuance of
CERs
Quan Moisture % m As per 100% electronic minimum of two
content delivery years after last
issuance of
CERs
Quan diesel oil L m As per 100% electronic minimum of two
used for delivery years after last
pay loader issuance of
CERs
Quan Bunker fuel KL m As per 100% Electronic minimum of two
oil for delivery years after last
plant’s start issuance of
upt CERs
Quan Diesel oil km m As per 100% Electronic minimum of two
used for delivery years after last
delivery of issuance of
rice husk CERs
from RM to
power plant
site
D. APPLICATION OF A MONITORING
METHODOLOGY AND PLAN

D.4. DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONAL AND MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE THAT THE


PROJECT OPERATOR WILL IMPLEMENT TO MONITOR EMISSION
REDUCTION AND LEAKAGE EFFECTS GENERATED BY PROJECT ACTIVITY

TO MAINTAIN A DAILY OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE LOGS BY


OPERATORS HEADED BY SHIFT LEADER THAT CAN ALLOW LSRM
MANAGEMENT TO ADDRESS IMMEDIATE PROBLEMS
TO PREPARE A MONTHLY REPORT TO THE MANAGEMENT’S TECHNICAL
MONITORING GROUP TO DETERMINE SIGNIFICANT DEVIATIONS TO
TARGET EMISSIONS LEVEL AND RECOMMEND APPROPRIATE ACTIONS
SUMMARY REPORT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING:
1. SUMMARY
2. ACCIDENTS AND MALFUNCTIONS
3. SAFETY AND ENVRONMENT
4. PLANT PERFORMANCE AND AVAILABILITY
5. METER RECORDS
6. FUEL REPORT
7. PERSONNEL CHANGES
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM
OPERATIONAL AND MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE TO
MONITOR MISSION REDUCTION AND LEAKAGE EFFECTS

OPERATORS OPERATE MONTHLY REPORT


& MONITOR PLANT BY PREPARATION BY
SHIFTS, DAILY OPERATORS

REPORT/DATA
INTERPRETATION AND
IN CASE OF VISIIBLE RECOMMENDATION BY
PROBLEMS, CORRECTIVE TECHNICAL GRO UP
ACTION IMMEDIATELY
DONE BY ENG’G AND
MAINTENANCE GROUP

MANAGEMENT ACTION
FOR LONG TERM
SOLUTION
D. APPLICATION OF A MONITORING
METHODOLOGY AND PLAN

D.5. NAME OF PERSONS/ENTITY DETERMINING THE MONITORING


METHODOLOGY

INTERCO PERSONNEL
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT

E. ESTIMATION OF GHG EMISSIONS BY


SOURCES
E. ESTIMATION OF GHG EMISSIONS BY SOURCES

ELECTRICITY GRID RICE HUSK BOILER


28,350 t CO2 274.18 t CO2 EQUIV / YR

DIESEL FOR HAULING TO PLANT EMISSION


TRANSPORT
(52.62 t CO2e, not 5.21 t CO2 EQUIV / YR REDUCTION
claimed)
ON-SITE TRANSPORT 28,071 t CO2/ YR
RICE HUSK OPEN MINIMAL
AIR BURNING
$ 140,353
(1,437.4 t CO2, not
AUXILIARY FUEL
claimed)
MINIMAL

TOTAL TOTAL PROJECT


BASELINE EMISSIONS
EMISSIONS 279.39 t CO2/ YR
28,350 t CO2/YR
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT

F. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
F. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
F.1 DOCUMENTATION ON THE ANALYSIS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACTS, INCLUDING TRANSBOUNDARY IMPACTS

SO2 emissions will be within DENR standards. There will be regular


quarterly monitoring to ensure compliance with the standard. Any
expected SO2 will be captured in the scrubber stage of the
electrostatic precipitator.
NOx emissions is not expected to go beyond the standard as the low
NOx design of boiler will ensure compliance.
Particulates and fly ash will be captured in an electrostatic
precipitator for controlled removal..
Wastewater will not be permitted to leave the plant site. Instead, it
will be first treated and then evaporated from an evaporating pond.
Ash will be disposed of safely. If the RHA from the project cannot be
sold, provision has been made to bury the ash on-site, thereby
preventing it from escaping into the atmosphere or entering the local
waterways via runoff.
The large size of the site combined with tree plantings will buffer
ambient noise.
INTERCO GROUP MEMBERS

Domingo Perez
Christian Alvin Ong
Art Torralba
Angelito David
Merlyn Rivera

You might also like