Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Radiohead Memo Case Analysis

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Conclusion In my opinion, this was a good and innovative strategy that came out of the traditional model used

used by major record


companies. Radiohead did something unique and different that could bring it many benefits both musically and
financially for the following reasons:
 By not being tied to a contract with a record label, I can infer that the band did not have to share
profits with middlemen
 Costs for distribution channels would be minimal when using the Radiohead’s website
 Even people paying zero had to pay a service fee which I presume is sufficient to prevent them
losing money on downloads
 By offering a $40 CD box edition pre-order, the band would attract the serious fan market with
something more expensive than a typical CD offering, and pre-ordering allows it to size the
production run so the band won't lose money

Background Radiohead is an English rock band formed in 1985. It was one of the most popular and artistically significant
contemporary bands of the late 20th and 21st centuries. Between 1993 and 2003 the band released six albums that
earned it a huge success among its followers and a reputation for experimenting with unconventional album release
tactics. By 2003, the contract with EMI ended and the band decided not to renew it. By 2005, the band began to
record its seventh album In Rainbows, which was self-produced and self-released by Radiohead. Without a recording
contract, the band was free to release its music when it wanted to and how it wanted to. By 2007, Radiohead’s
website announced the release of In Rainbows, in unusual but attractive way. The album would be available
exclusively through its website for digital download, but consumers would have the option to decide their own price
for it.

Case Issue The band Radiohead announced it would allow customers to decide how much to pay for its new album, released
exclusively as a digital download and available only from the band's own web site. Was the plan a good idea? And
how this strategy would impact the music industry?

Analysis The strategy for the release of this album seems to be unprofitable but attractive for customers. The highly unusual
plan represented a significant break from the industry standard of fixes prices for music (typically $0.99 for
individual digital song and $9.99 or more for complete albums). However, by not including a percentage of profit for
the record company, the product's price could drop substantially. Also, considering the popularity of the band, there
were thousands of potential buyers who are willing to pay or get for a copy and the possibilities were:
 Setting price as low as possible even equals to zero dollar.
 Setting a price buyers consider “fair” value.
 Setting a price above the “fair” value.
The first one would create profit in the future when potential buyers who have bought the album without paying any
dollar are likely to buy the next album or recommend it to friends. If the second and third possibility happens the
profits could be high. Also, lower price could mean higher profit because buyers will buy more of the product as a
result of a low price.

Take away The music industry is being forced to transform its business models and distribution strategies to sustain market share
and create new revenue sources. The increase in digital content, number of new distribution channels– a result of
rising Internet penetration, shifting demographics and changing consumption habits– is having a dramatic impact on
the industry supply chain and the current structure appears inadequate. Industry players, therefore, should adjust their
existing processes by adopting cost reduction initiatives and introducing new business strategies, as name your own
price sale and digital distribution, to remain competitive.

MEMO Re: Radiohead: Music at your own price

You might also like