Creativity: Beyond The Myth of Genius
Creativity: Beyond The Myth of Genius
Creativity: Beyond The Myth of Genius
Creativity requires whole-brain thinking; right-brain imagination, artistry and intuition, plus left-
brain logic and planning. Creativity and creative acts are therefore studied across several
disciplines - psychology, cognitive science, education, philosophy (particularly philosophy of
science), technology, theology, sociology, linguistics, business studies, and economics.
To be creative, it is not enough for it to be novel: it must have value, or be appropriate to the
cognitive demands of the situation."
[1]
Need for creativity
[2]
How to be creative ?
In order to be creative, you need to be able to view things in new ways or from a different
perspective. Among other things, you need to be able to generate new possibilities or new
alternatives. Tests of creativity measure not only the number of alternatives that people can
generate but the uniqueness of those alternatives. the ability to generate alternatives or to see
things uniquely does not occur by change; it is linked to other, more fundamental qualities of
thinking, such as flexibility, tolerance of ambiguity or unpredictability, and the enjoyment of
things heretofore unknown.
Individuals who have changes our culture in some important way. Because their achievement
are by definition public, it is easier to write about them. (e.g., Leonardo, Edison, Picasso,
Einstein, etc.)
USES OF CREATIVITY
Creativity is of great use in housekeeping. Simplification requires a lot of creativity. Re-
engineering requires creativity. Effective downsizing requires creativity.
Creativity is not just for problem-solving. Very often the most powerful effects of creativity are
seen when we challenge existing ways of doing things which are very satisfactory.
In 1971 I suggested to Shell Oil that they should consider drilling oil wells which proceeded
sideways when the right depth was reached. Today most oil-wells are drilled exactly like that.
Such wells yield between three and six times as much oil. There had been nothing wrong with
traditional oil wells. But it was a matter of challenging something that was not a problem.
I am not claiming that the change in drilling wells was a direct result of my suggestion - I have
no way of proving that. It is a historical fact, however, that I made the suggestion in 1971.
[3]
Characteristics of the creative
personality:
Creative individuals have a great deal of energy, but they are also often quiet and at
rest.
Creative individuals tend to be smart, yet also naive at the same time.
Creative individuals alternate between imagination and fantasy ant one end, and rooted
sense of reality at the other.
Creative individuals are also remarkable humble and proud at the same time.
Creative individuals to a certain extent escape rigid gender role stereotyping and have a
tendency toward androgyny.
Most creative persons are very passionate about their work, yet they can be extremely
objective about it as well.
[4]
Advantages and Disadvantages of
Creativity:
While we often view creativity as something positive, and it often is, but it can also be negative.
You can use ideas to improve the world, but you can also have ideas that bring hell on earth.
Creative can bring you fun, fame and fortune, but it can also ruin, ostracize and kill you.
ADVANTAGES OF CREATIVITY
1. Personal Advantages
a. Fun
b. Improve mankind
c. Bring Fun
[5]
DISADVANTAGES OF CREATIVITY
1. Personal Disadvantages
b. Isolation
3. Consequences
b. Plan Ahead
c. Follow up .
[6]
TECHNIQUES FOR DEVELOPING
CREATIVITY:
Long term improvements in creativity and innovative capacity depend very much on an
organisation's ability to develop appropriate control and reward systems, and on the adoption
of management styles which encourage innovative approaches to problems.
One certain way of drying up the flow of ideas is to pass judgment on specific notion as
they are put forward.
One non-creative way of treating ideas is to deny them evaluation and consideration.
It is possible to focus attention and to heighten sensitivity towards the task at hand by
structuring the situation in which any particular technique is attempted. Such structural
aids, though simple in themselves, go a long way towards improving the chances of
success.
[7]
Although the actual limit must vary from case to case, there is a lot to be gained by
limiting the time available and, perhaps, reducing the chances of over-elaboration and
evaluation.
Those working on the technique must be free from distraction and interruption, so as to
allow them to focus their full attention on the problem before them. Telephone calls are
fatal!
Ideas get lost when they are not recorded. Evidence suggests that short term memory
inhibits us in problem solving and idea building because of the limited number of steps
and developments that can be held in the mind at any one time.
Creativity techniques only really work well when those attempting them are enthusiastic
and motivated.
[8]
The Techniques:
Most creativity techniques rely on two basic approaches. These are:
Conclusion:
- There is considerable danger that managers may see the use of operational
creativity techniques as being the "answer" to the creativity problem.
[9]
Creativity in management:
Managers usually have well defined responsibilities, duties, powers. So it can be difficult for
them to be creative. They can be creative in framing management policies, in team building,
making plans, etc. Some of the barriers to creative thinking are fear, anxiety, pessimism, stress,
and environment. The creative thinking ability can be stunted due to fear of failure, fear of
humiliation, fear of risk taking, etc.
The exploring stage involves identifying alternative courses of action. The inventing stage
involves identifying techniques and methods to help in creative thinking. The selection stage
involves analysis of ideas and information.
The implementation stage involves selecting the best idea and implementing it. A review must
be made after the implementation. Creativity gives an organization a competitive advantage
and a unique identity over its rivals. Nevertheless, creativity in organizations can exist only with
supportive environments. An organization that has a creative culture can nurture new ideas,
diverse thoughts, and encourage risk taking nature.
Many people believe that creativity is inborn and cannot be developed. But by identifying and
overcoming the barriers, creativity can be developed in an individual. In order to develop
creativity, a creative and encouraging work environment has to be created.
Apart from overcoming the barriers, managers can use certain tools and techniques to develop
creative thinking in organizations. There are various techniques for creative thinking like
brainstorming, attribute changing technique, morphological analysis, and synectics. Creative
thinking can be stimulated using lateral thinking, the Delphi technique, and mind mapping.
[10]
What is Decision Making?
The word 'decision' is derived from the Latin words de ciso which means 'a cutting away or a
cutting off or in a practical sense' to come to a conclusion. Decisions are made to achieve goals
through suitable follow-up actions. Decision-making is a process by which a decision (course of
action) is taken. Decision-making lies embedded in the process of management. Decision-
making is an essential aspect of modern management.
[11]
Definitions of Decision-making:
1. The Oxford Dictionary defines the term decision-making as "the action of carrying out or
carrying into effect".
[12]
Management decision making
It is self-evident that better management decision making and problem solving can greatly
improve an organization's profits and goals. My research has shown that the SM-14 model is by
far the best management decision making tool. A number of studies have shown that managers
do not achieve much over 50% correct results in their decision making and problem solving.
Why is this? Decision making technique has only been taught to a small extent in our colleges
and universities. Many now offer a decision sciences course. But what has been lacking is
widespread teaching of a good introductory course to decision making and a decision making
model formula suitable as a standard, such as SM-14. Teaching decision making using a
universal complete model such as SM-14 and a standard short model would be a tremendous
advance in management decision making.
It was Peter Drucker who first strongly advocated the scientific method of decision-
making in his world famous book 'The Practice of Management' published in 1955. Drucker
recommended the scientific method of decision-making which, according to him, involves the
following six steps:
[13]
The figure given below suggests the steps in the decision-making process:
[14]
1. Identifying the Problem:
Identification of the real problem before a business enterprise is the first step in the
process of decision-making. It is rightly said that a problem well-defined is a problem half-
solved. Information relevant to the problem should be gathered so that critical analysis of the
problem is possible. In brief, the manager should search the 'critical factor' at work. It is the
point at which the choice applies. Similarly, while diagnosing the real problem the manager
should consider causes and find out whether they are controllable or uncontrollable.
The most obviously troubling situations found in an organization can usually be identified
as symptoms of underlying problems. (See Table 1 for some examples of symptoms.) These
symptoms all indicate that something is wrong with an organization, but they don't identify
root causes. A successful manager doesn't just attack symptoms; he works to uncover the
factors that cause these symptoms.
[15]
3. Collecting Relevant Data:
After defining the problem and analyzing its nature, the next step is to obtain the relevant
information/ data about it. There is information flood in the business world due to new
developments in the field of information technology. All available information should be utilised
fully for analysis of the problem. This brings clarity to all aspects of the problem.
[16]
7. Ensuring Feedback:
Feedback is the last step in the decision-making process. Here, the manager has to
make built-in arrangements to ensure feedback for continuously testing actual developments
against the expectations. It is like checking the effectiveness of follow-up measures. Feedback is
possible in the form of organised information, reports and personal observations. Feed back is
necessary to decide whether the decision already taken should be continued or be modified in
the light of changed conditions.
[17]
Steps to enhance decision making skills:
Commit!
When you make a decision, you can do one of two things. You can spend a lot of time, effort
and energy considering what it would have been like if you had made a different decision and
searching the internet for more tips on decision making processes. Or you can spend that time,
effort and energy on making your decision work. You get to decide. (Sorry, couldn't resist it!)
Peter Drucker, the management guru, insists that it is much more important to do the right
thing. Most people really do know what the right thing is. But because it's difficult, disagreeable
or uncomfortable, they choose not to make that decision. They choose something different.
The consequence is misery. Only the amount and duration varies.
[18]
The best
Here's another great barrier in decision making to help you delay some more: The desire to
make the best decision. In truth, there really is no way to know which is the best decision. Every
decision will have consequences, so what people end up doing is comparing the consequences.
This is all well and good, but it makes for an unclear decision. It doesn't actually get anything
done.
It's much more useful to consider whether a particular decision will be effective or not, within
the frame you choose. People in critical situations quickly learn this decision making skill. Gary
Klein has studied firefighters and medical personnel, people who make decisions in life or death
situations. They just don't have time to weigh up the pros and cons. They are asking themselves
about the effectiveness of a particular option. If they think it'll work, they go for it.
If at any point along the line they realise it is not working, they choose a different route that
they think will work. Then they do that. They will cycle one option at a time, until they find one
that works. They improve their decision making skills with experience in their area of expertise,
so their first option is not random. It is the one most likely to work.
So it's much more useful to be effective and get the job done than to spend endless hours
trying to determine the best decision.
By the way, if you find yourself wasting a lot of time, this site offers some useful and effective
time management tips and techniques.
[19]
Give it lots of thought - not!
Most of the decision making models and processes available are organised around assessing
and understanding the issues at hand. The idea is to build your decision making skills so that
you are not engaged in decision making without critical thinking, but rather you reason and
think your way to making good decisions. Occasionally, it is suggested that you actually use
your intuition. But not, however, at the expense of logic and rationality.
To develop your decision making skills, this concept is one to pay attention to. There is an idea
that we actually make our decisions emotionally, and then justify it with reasons and
explanations, even excuses! An example would be making a decision to buy something that you
cannot really afford, but somehow you find a reason that it would be useful to you.
"The stereo costs more than my budget, but it would look great in my room and the great
sound would allow me to work more effectively".
Sound familiar?
Some of the newer sales training programs use this as the basis for their sales models. Why?
Because it works! They know they can make more money using this particular sales model.
[20]
Not making a decision
It is sometimes thought that by not making a decision, you cannot go wrong. The difficulty here,
of course, is that not making a decision is often a very poor decision. And not making a decision
may actually be a decision to not take action. A classic example is where all the evidence is that
there's a career change needed, but nothing happens. Another example might be not making
those decisions that are needed to keep yourself organized. Delayed decisions are a primary
cause of disorganization.
It's usually much more effective and useful to make a decision, act, assess as you go along, and
change the decision later if indicated.
This is obviously easier if the other tips and decision making skills mentioned above are in place.
[21]
IMPROVING CREATIVITY IN DECISION MAKING
Although following the steps of the rational decision making model will often improve
decisions, the rational decisions maker also needs creativity, that is, the ability to produce novel
and useful ideas. These are ideas that are problem or opportunity presented. Why is creativity
important to decision making? It allows the decision maker to more fully appraise and
understand the problem, including seeing problems others can’t see. However, creativity’s
most obvious value is in helping the decision maker identify all viable alternatives or to identify
alternatives that aren’t readily apparent.
Creative Potential: Most people have creative potential that they use when confronted
with a decision making problem. But to unleash that potential, they have to get out of the
psychological ruts many of us get into and learn how to think about a problem in divergent
ways.
People differ in their inherent creativity and exceptional creativity is scarce. Albert
Einstein. Emily Dickinson, Pablo Picasso, and Wolfgang Mozart were individuals of exceptional
creativity. What about the typical individual? People who score high on Openness to
Experience, for example, are more likely to be creative. Intelligent people also are more likely to
be creative. Other traits that have been found to be associated with creative people:
independence, self-confidence, risk taking, an internal locus of control, tolerance for ambiguity,
and perseverance in the face of frustration.
A study of the lifetime creativity of 461 men and women found that fewer than 1 percent
were exceptionally creative, but 10 percent were highly creative and about 60 percent were
some what creative. This suggests that most of us have creative potential; we just need to learn
to unleash it.
Three Component Model of Creativity: Given that most people have the capacity to be at
least somewhat creative, what can individuals and organizations do to stimulate employee
creativity? The best answer to this question lies in the three component model of creativity
.Based on an extensive body of research this model proposes that individual creativity
essentially requires expertise, creative thinking skills, and intrinsic task motivation. Studies
confirm that the higher the level of each of these three components, the higher the creativity.
Expertise is the foundation for all creative work. Many of Eminem’s lyrics for example,
were based on his childhood experiences. The film writer producer, and director Quentin
Tarantino spent his youth working in a video rental store, were he built up an encyclopedic
knowledge of movies. The potential for creativity is enhanced when individuals have abilities,
[22]
knowledge proficiencies, and similar expertise in their field of endeavor. For example, you
wouldn’t expect someone with a minimal knowledge of programming to be very creative.
Research suggests that we are more creative when we’re in good moods, so if we need
to be creative we should do things that make us happy. Perhaps that is listening to music we
enjoy, eating foods we like, watching funny movies or socializing with others. There is also
evidence that suggests being around others who are creative can actually make us more
inspired, especially if we’re creatively stuck.
The effective use of analogies allows decision makers to apply an idea from one context
to another. One of the most famous examples in which analogy resulted in a creative
breakthrough was Alexander Graham Bell’s observation that it might be possible to take
concepts of how that ear operates and apply them to his “talking box”. He noticed that the
bones in the ear are operated by a delicate, thin membrane. He wondered why then thicker
and stronger piece of membrane shouldn’t be able to move a piece of steel. Out of that
analogy, the telephone was conceived.
[23]
CREATIVITY AND DECISION MAKING MANAGEMENT AS
A WHOLE IN AN ORGANISATION:
Introduction
For managers in most work organizations, one of the most desirable and sought after talents
must surely be that of creativity.
[24]
Blocks to Creativity in Organisational Decision Making
If the need for creativity within organisations can so easily be identified, one might ask why it
sometimes seems to difficult for decision makers actually to be creative.
Variations in Function
In many organisations, work roles clustered around certain functions are seen as being
essentially creative, whilst others are not.
Lack of Recognition
Creativity behavior in most large-scale organisations has come to be regarded as something of a
bonus, one which cannot be planned in, and which must be sized upon as and when it occurs.
[25]
THE CREATIVE INDIVIDUAL
Having previously put forward the idea that creativity is, or at least can be, characteristic of all
individuals, it is only fair to admit that some people are visibly more creative than others.
Dissatisfaction
A common finding is, that highly creative individuals tend to show considerable dissatisfaction
with the current state of affairs.
Mental Abilities
According to Steiner "highs" (highly creative persons) usually outscore "lows" in tests of
conceptual fluency, conceptual flexibility, originality, and in a preference for complexity.
Self Awareness
In general findings about creative individual seem to emphasize the extent to which they have
an awareness of themselves, their acceptance of both good and bad personal characteristics,
and, in a sense, the way in which they seem able to turn what, to other people would seem,
weaknesses into strengths.
There is no doubt that many, if not all, organisations of any size contain some highly creative
people.
[26]
Potential Creativity of Organisation Members
The total creativity displayed by an organization is to a very great degree limited by the extent
to which its members are capable individually of creative behaviour.
Recruitment or Development
One option which is, of course, open to any organisation, is to seek out and recruit new
members who are felt to be especially creative.Recruitment Tends to be Most Useful During
Periods of Organisational Growth
[27]
Recruiting for More than "just" Creativity
It is only is very special circumstances that recruiters feel that creativity is the primary quality
they are looking for in potential recruits to an organisation.
- Encouragement and reward for finding, using and sharing such information
The following guidelines, if taken into account when designing or modifying the organisation's
reward system, will encourage and stimulate creative decision making activity.
[28]
(3) Reward Cooperative Activities
Innovation and creativity is increased through the sharing and cooperative building up of
information and of ideas.
(1) The expenditure of physical and mental effort in work is as natural as play or rest.
(2) External control, and the threat of punishment, are not the only means for bringing
about effort toward organisational objectives. Man will exercise self-direction and self-control
in the service of objectives to which he is committed.
(4) The average human being learns, under proper conditions, not only to accept, but to
seek reasonability.
(5) The capacity to exercise a relatively high degree of imagination, ingenuity and creativity
in the solution of organisational problems is widely, but narrowly, distributed in the population.
(6) Under the conditions of modern industrial life, the intellectual potentialities of the
average human being are only partially utilised.
[29]
The Manager and Creativity
Whatever the absolute level of creative ability within a group of employees, the extent to which
mere potential is turned into actual behaviour which benefits the organisation will depend very
largely on the way the manager chooses to act.
[30]
Management as a Creative Activity
It is certainly true that some decision situations is which managers find themselves are not ones
which call for high levels of creative activity, either from themselves or from subordinates.
Their view of the conditions that will promote a movement towards this style are:
(1) The recognition that it is possible to gain a competitive advantage through better
management.
(2) An increasing knowledge and acceptance of ideas from behavioural science, and their
application in the management of people.
(3) The rising standards of general education, making employees more resourceful and
useful to management in decision making but, at the same time, bringing new and different
demands and expectations.
(4) The growing need for managers to achieve higher levels of creativity and innovation in
making decisions and in solving organisational problems.
[31]
CASE DETAIL
American Express:
[32]
Key Topics In the case
• Change Management
• Financial Services
• Globalization
• International Business
• Strategic Management
CONCLUSION:
Creativity and sound decision making quailties of the vice president helped to confront the
challenges sucessfully.
[33]
BIBLOGRAPHY :-
www.articlesdatabase.com., internet
http://www.answers.com/topic/creativity#ixzz1HfzpoMJ9,
www.creativityatwork.com/articlesContent/whatis.htm
www.icmrindia.org/courseware/.../MEC04.htm
Source:- Internet
www.globelens.com
Google.com
[34]
[35]