Project Report On Self Compacting Concrete

A
PROJECT REPORT
ON
“APPLICATION OF INDUSTRIAL
WASTE- IN THE MANUFACTURING OF
SELF COMPACTING CONCRETE”
SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR
AWARD OF B. E. CIVIL, DEGREE OF SHIVAJI UNIVERSITY, KOLHAPUR
BY
Mr. Suraj N. Shah. Miss. Shweta S. Sutar.

Miss. Archana S. Shelake. Mr . Yogesh Bhagwat.
Mr. Amar Shinde. Miss. Priyanka S. Khurd.
Mr. Dasharath Bagade. Miss. Supriya H. Dhekale.
Mr. Vishnu Jadhavar . Mr. Naresh Madas.
UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF
Prof. M. B. KUMTHEKAR
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING,

GOVT. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, KARAD.
2008-09
GOVRNMENT COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, KARAD
Vidyanagar, Tal. Karad, Dist. Satara, Maharashtra, India
Phone No : 91-2164-2764-271711, 271712
Fax No. : 91-2164 – 271713
Web Site : www.gecek.org
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that, following batch of students

Mr. Vishnu Jadhavar . Mr. Naresh Madas.
has completed the project work entitled.
“Application of Industrial Waste in Self Compacting

Concrete”
This work is being submitted for the award of degree of

BACHELOR OF ENGINEERING in CIVIL ENGINEERING as a partial
fulfillment of the requirement of the prescribed syllabus of Shivaji
University, Kolhapur.
PROF. M. B. KUMTHEKAR
Guide & H.O.D.
Civil Engineering Dept.
Govt. College of Engineering,
Karad- 415124.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
It is indeed pleasure and a moment of satisfaction for us to express our gratitude

and sincere thanks to our project guide Prof. M. B. Kumthekar Head of Civil
Engineering Dept. Government College of Engineering, Karad, who have been
constant source of inspiration, guidance and encouragement.
We also express our sincere thanks to Prof. Dr. Pranesh Mrunal, Head of
Applied Mechanics Dept., for providing all the facilities for carrying out this project
work. Also we can not overlook the fact that, without the support of our Lion
Personality Principal Dr. A. S. Pant, our work would not have been accomplished in
its perfectance.
We express our special thanks to Mrs. Sucheta Kalwar and Mr. Sachin
Bhawasar of ACC Cement, Pune for sponsorship.
We express our special thanks to Mr. Kale, Perma Chemicals, Karad.
We are specially thanks to Hindalco, Belgaum and Kolhapur Steel Ltd.,
Kolhapur.
And finally we thank all the associates and colleagues who helped us directly or
indirectly in bringing up this system.
Mr. Vishnu Jadhavar . Mr. Naresh Mada
“APPLICATION OF INDUSTRIAL WASTE IN MANUFACTURING OF SELF COMPACTING
CONCRETE”
INDEX
SR.NO. CONTENT
PAGE
1. INTRODUCTION TO SELF COMPACTING CONCRETE
1
2. NEED FOR SCC

4
2.1. Advantages
2.2. Dis advantages
3. INGRADIENTS OF SCC
10
4 PROPERTIES OF SCC
14
3.1 Fresh SCC Properties
5. SCC AND MESUREMENT OF IT’S FLOW PROPERTIES

16
5.1 General
5.2 Test Methods
6. RED MUD AND FOUNDRY WASTE SAND

32
7. AIM OF EXPERIMENTATION
44
8. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE AND TEST RESULTS
46
8.1 General
8.2 Materials Used
8.3 Experimental Procedure
8.4 Test Results
9. COST COMPARISION
80
10. CONCLUSION
83
11. SCOPE FOR FURTHER STUDY
84
GOVT. COLLEGE OF ENGG. KARAD 4

CONCRETE”
SYNOPSIS
Self-compacting concrete (SCC) is an innovative concrete that

does not require vibration for placing and compaction. It is able to
flow under its own weight, completely filling formwork and achieving
full compaction, even in the presence of congested reinforcement. The
hardened concrete is dense, homogeneous and has the same
engineering properties and durability as traditional vibrated concrete.
Due to industrialization there is huge amount of red mud and
foundry waste sand created. Aluminum is now consume during
manufacture red mud which is used Red Mud and Foundry waste
Sand are industrial waste and causing threat to environment so the
reduce the cost of the construction also to make structure more
durable, reduce problem of this material the project has been
undertaken so that it can be used for construction fashion following
points attempted.
1] To study the properties of foundry waste sand.
2) To blend to mix or to replace cement by different % by foundry
waste sand.
3) To study properties of Red mud
4) To prepare the concrete by blending or by replacing the cement
by Red mud
5) To study the comparativeness.
Facing lot more problem of foundry waste.
Very close to the kolhapur there is project of steel industry,
sand used for the formation of mould when the molds are opened

CONCRETE”
the waste sand is dumped for the filling the low lying areas while
doing this the agriculture areas is converted into barren area
Because there is no. space for the waste other than the land filling
similar case is in case of Aluminum industry where red mud is
concluded to be waste. Which contains lot amount of bauxite and
that is why red mud is also dump in the nearby areas here it is
causing big threat for the society and it is disturbing the eco
system of the environment.
So it is the dire need to use this particular otherwise waste
material for the constructive in such fashion in the case of concrete
so that concrete which became cost effective as well as ecofriendly.
And hence this project is attempted.
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION TO SELF COMPACTING CONCRETE
The development of new technology in the material science is
progressing rapidly. In last three decades, a lot of research was carried
out throughout globe to improve the performance of concrete in terms of
strength and durability qualities. Consequently concrete has no longer
remained a construction material consisting of cement, aggregate, and
water only, but has becomes an engineered custom tailored material with
several new constituents to meet the specific needs of construction
industry. The growing use of concrete in special architectural
configurations and closely spaced reinforcing bars have made it very
important to produce concrete that ensures proper filling ability, good
structural performance and adequate durability. In recent years, a lot of
research was carried out throughout the world to improve the
performance of concrete in terms of its most important properties, i.e.

CONCRETE”
strength and durability. Concrete technology has under gone from macro
to micro level study in the enhancement of strength and durability
properties from 1980’s onwards. Till 1980 the research study was
focused only to flow ability of concrete, so as to enhance the strength
however durability did not draw lot of attention of the concrete
technologists. This type of study has resulted in the development of self
compacting concrete (SCC), a much needed revolution in concrete
industry. Self compacting concrete is highly engineered concrete with
much higher fluidity without segregation and is capable of filling every
corner of form work under its self weight only (Okamura 1997). Thus
SCC eliminates the needs of vibration either external or internal for the
compaction of the concrete without compromising its engineering
properties.
This concrete was first developed in Japan in late 80’s to combat
the deterioration of concrete quality due to lack of skilled labours, along
with problems at the corners regarding the homogeneity and compaction
of cast in place concrete mainly with intricate structures so as to improve
the durability of concrete and structures. After the development of SCC
in Japan 1988, whole Europe started working on this unique noise free
revolution in the field of construction industry. The last half of decade
1991-2000 has remained very active in the field of research in SCC in
Europe. That is why, Europe has gone ahead of USA in publishing
specifications and guidelines for self compacting concrete (EFNARC
2002). Now, all over the world, a lot of research is going on, so as to
optimize the fluidity of concrete with its strength and durability
properties without a drastical increase in the cost. The first North
American conference on design and use of self-consolidation concrete
was organized in November 2002. At present many researchers are
working in numerous universities and government R&D organizations

CONCRETE”
due to benefits of the use of this concrete. A very limited work is reported
from India, where the future for concrete is very bright due to scarcity of
skilled man power, non-mechanization of construction industry,
abundant availability of construction materials available at very low cost.
Therefore, it can be said that SCC is still quite unknown to many
researchers, builders, ready mix concrete producers, academia etc.
Self compacting concrete is basically a concrete which is capable of
flowing in to the formwork, without segregation, to fill uniformly and
completely every corner of it by its own weight without any application of
vibration or other energy during placing. There is no standard self-
compacting concrete. There fore each self-compacting concrete has to be
designed for the particular structure to be constructed. However working
on the parameters which affect the basic properties of self-compacting
concrete such as plastic viscosity, deformability, flowability and
resistance to segregation, self-compacting concrete may be proportioned
for almost any type of concrete structure.
To establish an appropriate mixture proportion for a self-
compacting concrete the performance requirements must be
defined taking into account the structural conditions such as shape,
dimensions, reinforcement density and construction conditions. The
construction conditions include methods of transporting, placing,
finishing and curing. The specific requirement of self-compacting
concrete is its capacity for self-compaction, without vibration, in the
fresh state. Other performances such as strength and durability should
be established as for normal concrete.
To meet the concrete performance requirements the following three
types of self-compacting concretes are available.
a) Powder type of self-compacting concrete: This is proportioned to
give the required self-compactability by reducing the water-powder

CONCRETE”
(material<0.1mm) ratio and provide adequate segregation resistance.

Super plasticizer and air entraining admixtures give the required
deformability.
b) Viscosity agent type self-compacting concrete: This type is
proportioned to provide self-compaction by the use of viscosity
modifying admixture to provide segregation resistance. Super
plasticizers and air entraining admixtures are used for obtaining the
desired deformability.
c) Combination type self-compacting concrete: This type is
proportioned so as to obtain self-compactability mainly by reducing
the water powder ratio, as in the powder type, and a viscosity
modifying admixture is added to reduce the quality fluctuations of
the fresh concrete due to the variation of the surface moisture
content of the aggregates and their gradations during the
production. This facilitates the production control of the concrete.
CHAPTER 2
NEED FOR SCC
Now having a look over history of SCC, question arises that what is
needed to go for SCC? So, here are some of the important aspects to go
with SCC:
Foundry sand and red mud has pozzolanic properties

hence increasing the binding properties and gives the better strength at
the same time it reduces the cost problems. And also reduces the
following problems.
1. Foundry waste dumping
2. Red mud dumping.
In dumping land become useless. It starts polluting the groundwater.

CONCRETE”
So it should be used in some constructive fashion. Which is going to

cater in two ways Help in getting better quality of concrete.
For several years, the problem of the durability of concrete

structures has been a major problem posed to engineers. To make
durable concrete structures, sufficient compaction is required.
Compaction for conventional concrete is done by vibrating.
Over vibration can easily cause segregation. In conventional concrete, it
is difficult to ensure uniform material quality and good density in heavily
reinforced locations.
If steel is not properly surrounded by concrete it leads to durability
problems. This is the problem mainly with heavily reinforced sections
where a very high congestion of reinforcement is seen. In this case, it
becomes extremely difficult to compact the concrete. Then what can be
done to avoid honeycombing?
The answer to the problem may be a type of concrete which can get
compacted into every corner of form work and gap between steel, purely
by means of its own weight and without the need for compaction. The
SCC concept was required to overcome these difficulties.
The SCC concept can be stated as the concrete that meets special
performance and uniformity requirements that cannot always be
obtained by using conventional ingredients, normal mixing procedure
and curing practices.The SCC is an engineered material consisting of
cement, aggregates, water and admixtures with several new constituents
like colloidal silica, pozzolanic materials, chemical admixtures to take
care of specific requirements, such as, high-flowability, compressive
strength, high workability, enhanced resistances to chemical or
mechanical stresses, lower permeability, durability, resistance against
segregation, and possibility under dense reinforcement conditions.

CONCRETE”
The properties, such as, fluidity and high resistance to segregation

enables the placement of concrete without vibrations and with reduced
labour, noise and much less wear and tear of equipment.
Use of SCC overcomes the problem of concrete placement in
heavily reinforced sections and it helps to shorten construction period.
Self-compacting concrete is growing rapidly, especially in the pre-
cast market where its advantages are rapidly understood and utilized.
Super plasticizer enhances deformability and with the reduction of
water/powder segregation resistance is increased.
High deformability and high segregation resistance is obtained by
limiting the amount of coarse aggregate.
However, the high dosage of super-plasticizer used for reduction of
the liquid limit and for better workability, the high powder content as
‘lubricant’ for the coarse aggregates, as well as the use of viscosity-agents
to , as well as the use of viscosity-agents to increase the viscosity of the
concrete have to be taken into account.
Now in our project we are(have) used replacement of(done
replacement of/replaced) cement by volume by red mud and foundry
waste. Because of red mud and foundry waste are solid waste.
Also conventional method of waste red mud in ponds has often
adverse environmental impact and during monsoon waste may be
carried by runoff to the surface water course and a result of leaching
may cause contamination of ground water, for further disposal of large
quantities of red mud dumped, produces problem’s of storage occupying
of a lot of space at present about 60 million tones of red mud is
generated annually worldwide which is not being recycled satisfactorily.
The use of red mud due to higher compressive strength. To make light
weight strong concrete. Typical red mud contains Cao, Sio2, and Fe2O3

CONCRETE”
Foundry waste basically contents (contains) uniformly sized, and

which having one or more organic binder.
If some new sand and binder is typically added to maintain the
quality of casting and make up sand lost during operation.
Also it is used for purposes as substitute constituents in aggregate
and as kiln feed in the manufacture of Portland cement. It having low
absorption and non plastic nature. It mobiles leachable fraction, angle of
shear resistance be in the range of 33 to 40 degree as compared to
conventional sand.
Besides above following are the advantages of SCC:
1. Improved Concrete Quality:
SCC yields homogeneous concrete in situations where the castings
are difficult due to congested reinforcement, difficult access etc.
SCC shows a good filling ability especially around reinforcement
SCC is very well suited for special and technically demanding
structures such as tunnel linings, as the possibility to compact the
concrete is limited in the closed space between formwork and rock.
Shows narrow variation in properties on site.
Most suitable for concrete filled tubes (CFT) technology
construction for high rise buildings.
It ensures better quality of in-situ pile foundation.
2. Environmental & Human Health Protection:

Reduces noise at sites, the pre cast factory, and neighborhood,
hence, it is a silent concrete.
Eliminates problems with blood circulation leading to “white
fingers” caused by compacting equipment, hence called a healthy
concrete.

CONCRETE”
SCC gives noise protection in precast industry, by introducing no

restrictive measures like ear protection, marked areas, safety
instructions are necessary.
Shortens the construction time by accelerating construction
process, especially in pre cast industry.
3. Economy & Time Reducing:
Its ease of placement improves the productivity and the cost saving
through reduced equipment and labor equipment.
Reduction in wear and tear of forms, therefore, it extends the
service life of forms.
Reduction in the number of worker. Normally one cum requires 1.5
man-hours; with SCC this is reduced to 0.35 man-hours.
It reduces the consumption of resources and cost, even considering
a higher price per cubic meter for the concrete. Okamura has
reported that it is possible to reduce the overall bridge cost by 5-
15%.
Because of its high fluidity, this concrete does not need any
vibrations so that it allows to save energy and ensure suitable cost
in place.
Reduction of expenses and manpower needed for patching finished
precast elements.
It can enable the concrete supplier to provide better consistency in
delivering concrete, which reduces the interventions at the plants
or job sites.
4. Construction with SCC is not affected by the skill of the workers,
and shape and arrangement of reinforcing bars of the structures.
5. SCC use at construction sites reduces the chance of accident by
reducing number of cables needed for the operation of compacting
equipment, hence, reduces the workers compensation premiums.

CONCRETE”
6. It gives wide opportunity for the use of high-volumes of by

products materials15-18
Such as fly ash, lime stone powder, quarry dust etc., (Yahia et al.
1999, Bouzoubaa, and Lachemi 2001, Persson 2002, Naik and
Kumar 2003) since a higher volume of powder material is required
for enhancing the cohesiveness and reducing the amount of
superplasticizer and viscosity modifying agents.
In spite of above all, following are the some of the disadvantages of

SCC:
DISADVANTAGES OF SCC
The production of SCC places more stringent requirements on the
selection of materials in comparison with conventional concrete.
An uncontrolled variation of even 1% moisture content in the fine
aggregate will have a much bigger impact on the rheology of SCC at
very low W/C (~0.3) ratio. Proper stock pilling of aggregate,
uniformity of moisture in the batching process, and good sampling
practice are essential for SCC mixture,
A change in the characteristics of a SCC mixture could be a
warning sign for quality control and while a subjective judgment,
may some times be more important than the quantitative
parameters.
The development of a SCC requires a large number of a trial
batches. In addition to the laboratory trial batches, field size trial
batches should be used to simulate the typical production
conditions. Once a promising mixture has been established,
further laboratory trial batches are required to quantify the
characteristics of the mixture.

CONCRETE”
SCC is costlier than conventional concrete initially based on

concrete materials cost due to higher dosage of chemical
admixtures, i.e. high range water reducer and viscosity enhancing
admixture (VEA). Increase in material cost can be easily offset with
improvement in productivity, reductions in vibration cost and
maintenance and proper uses of mineral admixtures.
CHAPTER 3
3.1 INGRADIENTS OF SCC
SCC is something different than the conventional concrete or
modification of conventional concrete it has similar ingredients such as
Aggregate binder, however there blending is changed so as to get the
advantage of self compactness:
3.1.1 Cement:- Generally Portland cement is used for SCC.

CONCRETE”
3.1.2Aggregates:- The maximum size of aggregate is generally limited

to 20mm . Aggregate of size 10 mm is desirable for structures having
congested reinforcement. Wherever possible size of aggregate higher than
20 mm could also be used. Well graded cubical or rounded aggregate are
desirable. Aggregates should be of uniform quality with respect to shape
and grading.
Fine aggregate can be natural or manufactured. The grading must
be uniform throughout the work. The moisture content or absorption
characteristics must be closely monitored as quality of SCC will be
sensitive to such changes.
Particles smaller than 0.125mm i.e. 125 micron size are considered
as FINES which contribute to the powder content.
3.1.3 Mixing water: - Ordinary potable water of normally pH 7 is

used for mixing and curing the concrete specimen.
3.1.4 Admixtures for SCC:-An admixture is a material other than

water, aggregates and cement and is added to the batch immediately
before or during its mixing. Admixtures are used to improve or give
special properties to concrete. The use of admixture should offer an
improvement not economically attainable by adjusting the proportions of
cement and aggregates and should not adversely affect any properties of
the concrete.
The admixture consist chiefly of those which accelerate and those
which retard hydration or setting of the cement, finely divided materials
which improves workability, waterproofers, pigments, wetting, dispersing
and air-entraining agents and pozzolanas.

CONCRETE”
Admixtures ranging from additions of chemicals to waste materials

have been used to improve certain properties of concrete. The admixture
is generally added in a relatively minute quantity. The degree of control
must be higher to ensure that over dosages are unlikely to occur. Excess
quantity of admixture may be detrimental to the properties of concrete. It
may be mentioned here that concrete of poor quantity will not be
converted to the good quality concrete by adding admixture.
As mentioned briefly before basic properties of self-
compacting concrete are plastic viscosity, deformability, flowability and
resistance to segregation. Several components of concrete are used
provide and control these properties. It is important to have a stable
equilibrium between the plastic viscosity and the yield stress in the self-
compacting concrete. If this equilibrium is upset then we may have
several problems such as, insufficient flow which will affect the filling
ability leading to incomplete filling of the forms or, too low a plastic
viscosity which may cause segregation. Fig.1 shows in qualitative way,
the influence on the yield stress and plastic viscosity of the individual
components of concrete.
The effect of each component may be summarized as follows:
Variations in the powder content affect mainly the yield stress
and some extent the plastic viscosity.
Air content affects mainly the plastic viscosity.
Water affects the yield stress and the plastic viscosity.
Superplasticizer dosage affects mainly the yield stress and
marginally the plastic viscosity.
Viscosity modifying admixtures affect mainly the plastic
viscosity.

CONCRETE”
The proposed viscosity modifying admixture is high molecular

weight polyelectrolytes with high affinity to water. It imparts structure to
the liquid phase of the mix by interaction of ionic functional groups with
water and its own molecules. By binding the water to itself, the viscosity
of the pore water is increased and, in addition, a three dimensional
network is formed. The combination of both affects contribute to the
effective control of the viscosity of the mix and prevent bleeding and
segregation
The ionic interaction of the viscosity modifying admixture
molecules are flexible and can be partially or completely broken down
when a reactive low force (shear) is applied. The yield stress is slightly
increased. At normal mixing or placing conditions (moderate shear), the
interactions of the viscosity modifier mentioned above, guarantee the
homogeneity of the mix and prevent the segregation. The balance
between the yield stress and the plastic viscosity is the key to the
appropriate self-compacting concrete rheology.
3.1.4.1 Chemical Admixtures:-

Superplasticizer
GleniumTM SKY 784 is used because it is essential component of SCC
to provide necessary workability.
Viscosity Modifying Agent (VMA)

Other types may be incorporated as necessary, such as Glenium Sky
is used for stability to improve freeze-thaw resistance, and retarders
for Control of Setting.

CONCRETE”
3.1.4.2 Mineral Admixtures:

Fly Ash: - Fly ash in appropriate quantity may be added to improve
the quality and durability of SCC.
Red Mud: - Red mud which is residual product of aluminum from
bauxite can be used in appropriate quantity to improve the quality
and durability of SCC.
Foundry waste sand: - Like Red mud, Foundry waste sand is also
another substitute to cement in concrete. It when used in appropriate
quantity help to improve the quality and durability of SCC.
CHAPTER 4
PROPERTIES OF SCC

CONCRETE”
4.1 Fresh SCC Properties

The 3 main properties of SCC in plastic state are
1. Filling ability (excellent deformability)
2. Passing ability (ability to pass reinforcement without blocking)
3. High resistance to segregation.
1. Filling ability
Self compacting concrete must be able to flow into all the spaces
within the formwork under its own weight. This is related to workability,
as measured by slump flow or Orimet test.
The filling ability or flowability is the property that characterizes
the ability of the SCC of flowing into formwork and filling all space under
its own weight, guaranteeing total covering of the reinforcement. The
mechanisms that govern this property are high fluidity and cohesion of
the mixture.
2. Passing ability
Self compacting concrete must flow through tight openings such as
spaces between steel reinforcing bars under its own weight. The mix
must not ‘block’ during placement.
The passing ability is the property that characterizes the ability of
the SCC to pass between obstacles- gaps between reinforcement, holes,
and narrow sections, without blocking. The mechanisms that govern this
property are moderate viscosity of the paste and mortar, and the
properties of the aggregates, principally, maximum size of the coarse
aggregate. Stability or resistance to the segregation is the property that
characterizes the ability of the SCC to avoid the segregation of its
components, such as the coarse aggregates. Such a property provides
uniformity of the mixture during transport, placement and consolidation.

CONCRETE”
The mechanisms that govern this property are the viscosity and cohesion
of the mixture.
3. High Resistance to Segregation
Self compacting concrete must meet the requirements of 1 and 2
while its original composition remains uniform. The key properties must
be maintained at adequate levels for the required period of time (e.g.20
min) after completion of mixing. It is property 2 the passing ability and
property 3 resistance to segregation that constitute the major advance,
form a merely super plasticized fresh mix which may be more fluid than
self compacting concrete mix.
Latest developments in accordance with the objectives of the
European SCC project aim to limit the admixtures used for general
purpose SCC s to only one by using new types and combinations of
polymers. Experience has shown that such an admixture may have to
add to generate and maintain compacting concrete using less liable
materials.

CONCRETE”
CHAPTER 5
SCC AND MEASUREMENT OF IT’S FLOW
PROPERTIES
5.1. GENERAL
It is important to appreciate that none of the test methods for SCC
has yet been standardized and the tests described are not yet perfected
or standardized. The methods presented here are descriptions rather
than fully detailed procedures. They are mainly ad-hoc methods, which
have devised specifically for SCC. Hence for the validation of concrete
these tests have not been considered.
In considering these tests, there are number of points which

should be taken into account:
One principal difficulty in devising such tests is that they have to
assess three distinct, though related, properties of fresh SCC – its
filling ability (flowability), its passing ability (free from blocking at
reinforcement), and its resistance to segregation (stability). No
single test is so far derived which can measure all the three
properties.
There is no clear relation between test results and performance on
site.
There is little precise data, therefore no clear guidance on
compliance limits.
Repetition of the tests is advised.
The test methods and values are stated for maximum aggregate
size upto 20 mm; different test values and/or different equipment
dimensions will be appropriate for other aggregate sizes.

CONCRETE”
Different test values may be appropriate for concrete being placed

in vertical and horizontal elements.
Similarly, different test values may be appropriate for different
reinforcement densities.
5.2. TEST METHODS
5.2.1 SLUMP FLOW TEST.

Introduction:
The slump flow is used to assess the horizontal free flow of SCC in
the absence of obstructions. It was first developed in Japan for use in
assessment of underwater concrete. The test method is based on the test
method for determining the slump. The diameter of the concrete circle is
a measure for the filling ability of the concrete.
Assessment of test:
This is simple, rapid test procedure, though two people are needed
if the T50 time is to be measured. It can be used on site, though the size
of the base plate is somewhat unwieldy and level ground is essential. It is
most commonly used test, and gives a good assessment of filling ability.
It gives no indication of the ability of the concrete to pass between
reinforcement without blocking, but may give some indication of
resistance to segregation. It can be argued that the completely free flow,
unrestrained by any boundaries, is not representative of what happens
in practice in concrete construction, but the test can be profitably be
used to assess the consistency of supply of ready-mixed concrete to a site
from load to load.

CONCRETE”
Equipment.
The apparatus is shown in figure.
Mould in the shape of a truncated cone with the internal

dimensions 200mm at the base, 100mm diameter at the top and a height
of 300mm, confirming to EN12350-2
Base plate of a stiff non-absorbing material, at least 700mm
square, marked with a circle marking the central location for the slump
cone, and a further concentric circle of 500mm diameter. The apparatus
usually required for this test are as under-
Trowel.
Scoop.
Ruler.
Stopwatch
Procedure:
About 6 liter of concrete is needed to perform the test, sampled
normally.
Moisten the base plate and inside of slump cone.
Place base plate on level stable ground and the slump cone
centrally on the base plate and hold down firmly.
Fill the cone with the scoop. Do not tamp, simply strike off the
concrete level with the top of the cone with trowel.
Remove any surplus concrete from around the base of the cone.
Raise the cone vertically and allow the concrete to flow out freely.

CONCRETE”
Simultaneously, start the stopwatch and record the time taken for
the concrete to reach the 500mm spread circle. (This is T50 time).
Measure the final diameter of the concrete in two perpendicular
directions.
Calculate the average of the two measured diameters. (This is
slump flow in mm).
5.2.2 U box test method
Introduction
The test was developed by the Technology Research Centre of the
Taisei Corporation in Japan. Sometimes the apparatus is called a “box
shaped” test. The test is used to measure the filling ability of self-
compacting concrete. The apparatus consists of a vessel divided by a
middle wall into two compartments, shown by R1 and R2 in Fig.
An operating with a sliding gate is fitted between the two sections.
Reinforcing bars with nominal diameters of 13mm are installed at the gate
with center-to-centre spacing of 50mm.This creates a clear spacing of
35mm between the bars. The left hand section is filled with about 20 liter of
concrete then the gate lifted and concrete flows upward into the other
section. The height of the concrete in both sections is measured.
Assessment of test.
This is a simple test to conduct, but the equipment may be difficult to
construct. It provides a good direct assessment of filling ability-this is
literally what the concrete has to do-modified by an unmeasured
requirement for passing ability. The 35 mm gap between the sections of
reinforcement may be considered too close. The question remains open of
what filling height less than 30 cm. is still acceptable

CONCRETE”
Fig. 5.2 – Box Test

Equipment.
U box of a stiff non absorbing material.
Trowel
Scoop
Stop watch.
Procedure
normally.
Set the apparatus level on firm ground, ensure that the sliding gate
can open freely and then close it.
Moisten the inside surfaces of the apparatus, remove any surplus
water.
Fill the one compartment of the apparatus with the concrete
sample.
Leave it to stand for 1 minute,
Lift the sliding gate and allow the concrete to flow out into the
other compartment.
After the concrete has come to rest, measure the height of the
concrete in the compartment has been filled, in two places and
calculate the mean (H1). Measure also the height in the other
compartment (H2)

CONCRETE”
Calculate H1-H2, the filling height.

The whole test has to perform within 5 minutes.
5.2.3 L box test method

Introduction
This test, based on a Japanese design for underwater concrete, has been
described by Peterson. The test assesses the flow of the concrete, and
also the extent to which it is subjected to blocking by reinforcement. The
apparatus is shown in figure.
The apparatus consists of a rectangular section box in the shape of
an ‘L’, with a vertical and horizontal section, separated by a moveable
gate, in front of which vertical lengths of reinforcement bars are fitted.
The vertical section is filled with concrete, and then the gate lifted
to let the concrete flow into the horizontal section. When the flow has
stopped, the height of the concrete at the end of the horizontal section is
expressed as a proportion of that remaining in the vertical section
(H2/H1 in the diagram). It indicates the slope of the concrete when at
rest. This is an indication passing ability, or the degree to which the
passage of concrete through the bars is restricted.
The horizontal section of the box can be marked at 200 mm and
400 mm from the gate and the times taken to reach these points
measured. These are known as T20 andT40 times and are an indication
for the filling ability.
The sections of bar can be of different diameters and spaced at
different intervals: in accordance with normal reinforcement
considerations, 3x the maximum aggregate size might be appropriate.
The bars can principally be set at any spacing to impose a more or
less sever test of the passing ability of the concrete.

CONCRETE”
Assessment of test.
This is widely is used test, suitable for laboratory, and perhaps site
use. It assesses filling and passing ability of SCC, and serious lack of
stability (segregation) can be detected visually. Segregation may also be
detected by subsequently sawing and inspecting sections of the concrete
in the horizontal section. Unfortunately there is no agreement on
materials, dimensions, or reinforcing bar arrangement, so it is difficult to
compare test results. There is no evidence of what effect the wall of the
apparatus and the consequent ‘wall effect’ might have on concrete flow,
but this arrangement does, to some extent, replicate what happens to
concrete on site when it is confined within formwork.
Two operators are required if times are measured, and a degree of
operator error is inevitable.
Equipment.
L box of a stiff non absorbing material
Trowel
Scoop
Stop watch

CONCRETE”
Procedure
normally.
Set the apparatus level on firm ground, ensure that the sliding gate
can open freely and close it.
Moisten the inside surfaces of the apparatus, remove any surplus
water
Fill the vertical section of the apparatus with the concrete sample.
Leave it to stand for 1 minute.
Lift the sliding gate and allow the concrete to flow out into the
horizontal section.
Simultaneously, start the stopwatch and record the times taken for
the concrete to reach the 200 and 400 mm marks.
When the concrete stops flowing, the distance “H1” and “H2” are
measured.
Calculate H2/H1, the Blocking Ratio.
The whole test has to be performed within 5 minutes.

CONCRETE”
5.2.4 Orimet Test

Introduction
The Orimet was developed at the University of Paisley as a method
for assessment of highly workable, flowing fresh concrete mixes on
construction sites. The equipment is shown in figure.
The test is based on the principle of an orifice rheometer. The
Orimet consists of a vertical casting pipe fitted with a changeable
inverted cone shaped orifice at its lower, discharge, end, with a quick –
release trap door to close the orifice. Usually the orifice has an 80 mm
internal diameter which is appropriate for assessment of concrete mixes
of aggregate size not exceeding 20 mm. Orifices of other sizes, usually
from 70 mm to 90 mm in diameter, can be fitted instead.
Operation consists simply of filling the Orimet with concrete then
opening the trap door and measuring the time taken for light to appear
at the bottom of the pipe(when viewed from above).
Assessment of test.
This test is able to simulate the flow of fresh concrete during actual
placing on sites. It is rapid test, and the equipment is simple and easily
maintained. The test has the useful characteristic of being capable of
differentiation between highly workable, flowing mixes, and might
therefore useful for compliance testing of successive loads on site. The
timing procedure, however, may be subjected to error, and ideally
requires two people.
Equipment.
Orimet device of a stiff non-absorbing material
Bucket (+/- 10 liter)
Trowel
Scoop

CONCRETE”
Stopwatch
Fig.5.4 Orimet Test
Procedure
normally.
Set the Orimet on firm ground.
Moisten the inside surfaces of the casting pipe and the orifice.
Keep the trap door open to allow any surplus water to drain.
Close the trap door and place a bucket underneath.
Fill the apparatus completely with concrete without compacting or
tapping, simply strike off the concrete level with the top with the
trowel.
Open the trap door within 10 seconds after filling and allow the
concrete to flow out under gravity.
Start the stopwatch when the trap door is opened, and record the
time for the discharge to complete9the flow time). This is taken to
be when light is seen from above through the orifice section.

CONCRETE”
5.2.5 V Funnel Test and V Funnel test at T5 minutes

Introduction
The test was developed in Japan and used Ozawa et al. The
equipment consists of a V-shaped tunnel, shown in fig. An alternative
type of V-funnel, the O funnel, with a circular section is also used in
Japan.
The described V-funnel test is used to determine the filling ability
(flow ability) of the concrete with a maximum aggregate size of 20mm.The
funnel is filled with about 12 liter of concrete and the time taken for it to
flow through the apparatus measured. After this the funnel can be
refilled concrete and left for 5 minutes to settle. If the concrete shows
segregation then the flow time will increase significantly.
Assessment of test
Though the test is designed to measure flow ability, the result is
affected by concrete properties other than flow. The inverted cone shape
will cause any liability of the concrete to block to be reflected in the
result – if, for example there is too much coarse aggregate. High flow time
can also be associated with low deformability due to high paste viscosity,
and with high inter-particle friction.
While the apparatus is simple, the effect of the angle of the funnel
and the wall effect on the flow of concrete are not clear.
Equipment.
V-funnel
Bucket (+/- 12 liter)
Trowel
Scoop
Stopwatch

CONCRETE”
Procedure of flow time

normally.
Set the V-funnel on firm ground
Moisten the inside surfaces of the funnel.
Keep the trap door open to allow any surplus water to drain.
Close the trap door and place a bucket underneath.
tamping; simply strike off the concrete level with the top with the
trowel.
Open within 10 sec after filling the trap door and allow the
concrete to flow out under gravity.
Start the stopwatch when the trap door is opened, and record the
time for the discharge to complete (the flow time). This is taken to
be when light is seen from above through the funnel.
Procedure of flow time at T5 minutes
Do not clean or moisten the inside surfaces of the funnel again.

CONCRETE”
Close the trap door and refill the v-funnel immediately after
measuring the flow time.
Place a bucket underneath.
tapping, simply strike off the concrete level with the top with the
trowel.
Open the trap door 5 minutes after the second fill of the funnel and
allow the concrete to flow out under gravity.
Simultaneously start the stopwatch when the trap door is opened,
and record the time for the discharge to complete (the flow time T
5minutes).
This is taken to be when light is seen from above through the
funnel.
5.2.6. J-RING TEST

Introduction:
The principle of J Ring test may be Japanese, but no references are
known. The J Ring test itself has been developed at the University of
Paisley. The test is used to determine the passing ability of the concrete.
The equipment consists of a rectangular section (30mmx25mm) open
steel ring, drilled vertically with holes to accept threaded sections of
reinforcement bar. These sections of bar can be of different diameters
and spaced at different intervals in accordance with normal
reinforcement consideration, 3x the maximum aggregate size might be
appropriate. The diameter of the ring of vertical bars is 300mm, and the
height 100mm.
The J Ring can be used in conjunction with the slump flow, the
Orimet test or even with the V-funnel. These combinations test the
flowing ability and (the contribution of J ring) the passing ability of the

CONCRETE”
concrete. The Orimet time and/or slump flow spread are measured are
usual to assess flow characteristics. The J ring bars can principally be
set at any spacing to impose a more or less severe test of the passing
ability of the concrete. After the test, the difference in height between the
concrete inside and that just outside the J ring is measured. This is an
indication of passing ability, or the degree to which the passage of
concrete through the bars is restricted.
Assessment of test:
These combinations of tests are considered to have great potential,
though there is no general view on exactly how results should be
interpreted. There are number of options- for instance it may be
instructive to compare the slump-flow/J Ring spread with the
unrestricted slump flow: to what extent is it reduced?
Like the slump flow test, these combinations have the
disadvantage of being unconfined, and therefore do not reflect the way
concrete is placed and moves in practice. The Orimet option has the
advantage of being dynamic test, also reflecting placement in practice,
though it suffers from requiring two operators.
Equipment:

CONCRETE”
Mould, without foot pieces, in the shape of a truncated cone with

the internal dimensions 200mm diameter at the base, 100mm diameter
at the top and a height of 300mm.
Base plate of a stiff none absorbing material, at least 700mm
square, marked with a circle showing the central location for the slump
cone, and a further concentric circle of 500mm diameter.
Trowel.
Scoop.
Ruler.
J ring a rectangular section (30mmx25mm) open steel ring, drilled
with holes. In the holes can be screwed threaded sections of
reinforcement bar (length 100mm, diameter 10mm, and spacing 48 +/-
2mm)
Procedure
normally.
Moisten the base plate and inside of slump cone,
Place base-plate on level stable ground.
Place the J ring centrally on the base plate and the slump-cone
centrally inside it and hold down firmly.
Fill the cone with the scoop. Do not tamp, simply strike off the
concrete level with the top of the cone with the trowel.
Remove any surplus concrete from around the base of the cone.
Raise the cone vertically and allow the concrete to flow out freely.
Measure the final diameter of the concrete in two perpendicular
directions.
Calculate the average of the two measured diameters (in mm).
Measure the difference in height between the concrete just inside
the bars and that just outside the bars.

CONCRETE”
Calculate the average of the difference in height at four locations

(in mm).
Note any border of mortar or cement paste without coarse
aggregate at the edge of the pool of concrete.
Tests to be fulfilled to qualify as SCC:

Though there are many test methods to confirm the
qualification to SCC, as mentioned above, no single method or
combination of methods have obtained universal acceptance.
One cannot declare a mix of SCC by only looking at the slump
flow. For example, a mix with slump of even 650mm or more may not be
an SCC, as it may, some times be susceptible to blocking and
segregation as well. For example [6], in japan, the slump flow test, V-
funnel test, and the box shaped test (or U-box test) are used for the
purpose of SCC acceptance. In Sweden slump flow and L-box test are
used.
So any mix aimed to be SCC must be tested for at least three
workability tests. These can be a combination of any of the following, in
addition to slump flow test, V-funnel test, L-box blocking ratio test etc.
Table 5.1: Suggested value of acceptance for different test

methods of SCC
Sl Methods Unit Typical range of values
No. Minimum Maximu
m
1 Slump flow by Abrams mm 600 800
cone
2 T50cm slump flow sec 2 5
3 J-ring mm 0 10

CONCRETE”
4 V-funnel sec 6 12
5 Time increase, V-funnel at sec 0 +3
T5minutes
6 L-box (h2/h1) 0.8 1.0
7 U-box h2-h1 0 30
8 Fill-box % 90 100
9 GTM screen stability test % 0 15
CHAPTER 6
RED MUD
Red mud is one of the major solid wastes coming from Bayer
process of alumina production. At present about 3 million tones of red
mud is generated annually, which is not being disposed or recycled
satisfactorily.

CONCRETE”
The conventional method of disposal of red mud in ponds has often

adverse environmental impact and during monsoon, the wastes may be
carried by runoff to the surface waters course and a result of leaching
may cause contamination of ground water; further disposal of large
quantities of red mud dumped, poses increasing problems of storage
occupying a lot of space.
Inspite of the fact that the aluminium production plant produces a
great quantity of red mud, such plants are producing aluminium at an
increasing rate of 1% per annum since last decade.
Red mud is predominantly, a finely powdered mud. It adversely effects
the air, land & water environment of surrounding area. With this
reference it is desired and greatly needed to utilize the red mud in some
way, or recycled, which otherwise is dumped in huge amounts any where
in nearby vicinity of the plant.
WHAT IS RED MUD?
Red mud is the iron rich residue from the digestion of bauxite. It is
one of the major solid waste coming from Bayer process of alumina
production. In general, about 2-4 tones of bauxite is required for
production of each tone of alumina (Al2O3) & about one tone red mud is
generated. Since the red mud is generated in bulk it has to be stored in
large confined & impervious ponds, therefore the bauxite refining is
gradually encircled by the" storage ponds. At present about 60 million
tones of red mud is generated annually world wide which is not being
disposed or recycled satisfactorily.
In the most common method of dumping that is the impoundment on
land in a diked impervious area called ponds. The mud slurry is pumped
to the ponds situated close to the bauxite refinery .The mud accumulates

CONCRETE”
& settles in the pond in due course of time. In order to reduce alkali
pollution through red mud a number of methods using drainage
decantation & special technique such as dry disposal have been
developed. Dry disposal is expensive & not yet installed any where in
India. However the dry disposal can only conserve the land to a
considerable extent, but the conservation of minerals remains
unattempted.
EFFECT OF RED MUD ON ENVIRONMENT
In the last decade, the production of aluminium inspite of some

stragnancy and even set back periods, has shown a steady rise of about
1%.
The ecological consequences of aluminium production are well
known; land devastation by bauxite exploitation usurpation of big land
areas by erection of disposal sites for red mud, threatening of surface &
underground water & air pollution by waste gases from aluminum
electrolysis plant & rolling mills. The degree of damage inflicted to
ground water & air during the single production stages from bauxite to
aluminium depends on a couple of tacts of which those connected with
the alumina winning & red mud disposal.
POSSIBLE IMPACT ON ENVIRONMENT
The impact of red mud impoundment can be manifest in several

ways, the biggest danger is water pollution. Ground usurpation
especially in case of cultivable soil or densly populated regions
disturbance of landscape harmany can sometimes assume trouble-some
relations. There is some danger, too by air pollution by dust spreading

CONCRETE”
from dry parts of impoundment. In order to prevent possible damages

depending on the peculiarities of each disposal site already in the
planning stage & then during the exploitation & after its end it is
necessary to make efforts for avoiding of damages or reducing them to
least amount.
GROUND WATER POLLUTION.
After rinsing & compacting, the red mud is transported to the

impoundment usually with a content of 3.5 to 5% even upto 7% Na-
oxide. It was found that the water with such content some times rises the
alkalinity of the underground water so that pH index can become larger
than 11.5 what was registered by piezometer located around the
sedimentation basins at Podgorical. In the wells from which water is
supplied to the surrounding population the pH of water is 10.5.
ENVIRONMENTAL RISK OF STORING RED MUD
Storage of red mud has a few inherent problems. Water stored in

raised up dyke System may over flow or cause change breach of the
dykes during heavy rains and high gales. Such breaches of the dykes
have been found to occur in red mud ponds causing surface pollution
and pollution of the nearby river, despite close vigil on the dykes. With
water stored at unnatural high level compared to the surroundings there
has been induction of caustic seepage to nearby unused wells,
confirming possible pollution of subsoil water system by seepage. In the
red mud pond classification of red mud particles takes place during
settling. The finer particles being on top consequently the pond with
exposed surface of dry mud becomes source of dust nuisance to the
adjoining locality during dry seasons. The people of the locality near the
CONCRETE”
pond have to bear the nuisance of dust which also carries fine particles
of soda & other residual Bayer chemicals.
UTILIZATION OF RED MUD
In order to protect the complete ecosystem, which is exposed to the

impact of the discharged red mud, it is indispensable to utilize in mass
quantity.
Red mud has been used for different commercial purposes. Some
of the commercial uses of red mud in different fields are as follows:-
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY
Cement, building blocks, or bricks to a lesser extent lightweight
aggregates and rubble are potential large volume applications where red
mud might be used. It is expected that a minimum pretreatment
(dewatering) would be required for use of red mud in bricks
and- lightweight aggregates. For use in cement and as a rubber filler,
acid washing would be required & complete drying and powdering would
be necessary for filler application. Cement and brick manufacturing
plants are fairly, widely distributed throughout the United States, with
light weight aggregate plants being less numerous. There is potential for
such plants being located near the source of red mud which is
considered necessary to minimize transportation costs.
Other application for red mud, such as application in exothermic mixes
as a scouring or polishing medium or as a drilling mud, are considered of
low potential for either technical, economic or low-volume reasons.
RED MUD AS CONCRETE MATERIAL

CONCRETE”
Red mud has been used to produce synthetic dense aggregate in

U.S.A & Japan (U.K. patent 1976) by pelletizing firing at temperature of
1200-1316 °C. The compressive, tensile and bending strengths of
concrete made with red mud aggregate have been found to be
considerably higher than those of concrete made with river gravel.
Light weight aggregates have been manufactured from mixture of red
mud and various other materials like fly ash, blast furnace slag etc.
Lightweight aggregate is used with cement to make a lightweight strong
concrete.
BRICKS FROM RED MUD
Bricks made with addition of 40 to 50 % red mud to the alluvial

soils on firing at 1000 to 1020 °C gives compressee strength of 20.0 to
25.0 kg/cm2. These bricks are golden yellow in colour and are better
suited as facing bricks. The bricks so produced do not show any
efflorescence & water absorption.
Pleasing colour & colour shades depending on content.
Improved dry strength for handling before firing.
Lower firing temperature & thus fuel or energy savings.
PLASTIC & RESIN FILLERS
Though numerous material can be used as fillers it was considered

significant that red mud as a filler in rubber gave a rupture strength
higher than all other fillers excepting carbon black. It should thus be a

CONCRETE”
suitable substitute for carbon black in some applications. Thus use as a

filler requires that the red mud slurry be acid washed, dried & powdered.
RED MUD PLASTIC
The recent development of a new material; red mud plastic (RMP)

made by combining polymer (PVC) and red mud waste, aims at
overcoming the negative qualities of PVC, while preserving & enhancing
its advantage.
CEMENT
Oxides of calcium, aluminium, silicon & to a minor extent iron

make up the major portion of the cement. A typical red mud contains
CaO, SiO2 and Fe2O3 in the range around 5 to 10 percent, 2 to 10
percent and 40 to 50 percent, respectively. Thus, its potential use as a
raw material for cement manufacture has been of interest. However, the
amount of red mud that might be incorporated directly as a raw material
would be low because it contains a relatively high iron oxide.
Addition of 15 percent of treated red mud to portland cement were
reported to increase strength & affect settling time. Greater additions
decreases the strength.
METALLURGICAL
Literature references on metal recovery total 140 articles. It is seen

that approximately half the reference pertain to recovery of iron.

CONCRETE”
Recovery of titania and additional alumina is also proposed. The higher

value metals such as niobium, gallium and vanadium have received
attention but are present in such low concentration that their
commercial recovery has not been tried.
Several processes have been developed to recover iron from the red mud
residues. One method is the carbon lime soda sinter process which can
be applied either to ore or to the red mud. In this process the iron is
reduced & recovered by magnetic separation from the waste residues
after alumina leaching. A U.S. patent has been issued describing the
application of fluidized bed to produce sponge granted for a process to
treat high iron content bauxite ores involving reductive roasting with
magnetic separation of iron form the leach residues.
Direct electric arc smelting of the red mud has been proposed for
recovery of iron from high-iron content bauxites. In this case, pig iron
can be produced with upto 98 percent recovery of iron value in the
bauxite. The slag from the smelting operation can also be further treated
to recover up to 84 percent of the alumina lost by the Bayer process. This
particular process was recently advocated by the McDowell Wellmen
Engineering Company as being both technically & economically feasible
and they have developed the process through a pilot scale stage. The
economics assume thai the pig iron or steel would be produced near the
bauxite refining plant to take advantage of low cost iron units in the red
mud.
ALUMINA & TITANIA RECOVERY
Alumina & titania recovery from the red mud are only of secondary
interest .However, if the mud is smelted from iron recovery, the slag from

CONCRETE”
the smelting operation can be leached with sodium carbonate solution to

recover most of the alumina values. Titania can be recovered by leaching
the residue of carbonate leach with sulfuric acid. The recovery of
titanium from the red nuid is technically feasible but the complicated
processing is too costly to compare with the recovery from natural
titanuim ores such as ilmenite and rutile.
OTHER METALS
Various other rare metals such as gallium, vanadium & scandium

can be recovered from the red mud residues or at various stages in the
Bayer process. It has been reported that gallium recovery is economical
by direct electrolysis of caustic aluminate liquors. Several studies have
also been conducted on vanadium recovery. In one method a vanadium
slag is separated from the pig iron mud. In another method, liquid-liquid
extraction by amines is used on the leach liquor from the Bayer process
to recover vanadium.
FOUNDRY WASTE SAND
ORIGIN

CONCRETE”
Foundry sand consists primarily of clean, uniformly sized, high-

quality silica sand or lake sand that is bonded to form molds for ferrous
(iron and steel) and nonferrous (copper, aluminum, brass) metal
castings. Although these sands are clean prior to use, after casting they
may contain Ferrous (iron and steel) industries account for
approximately 95 percent of foundry sand used for castings. The
automotive industry and its parts suppliers are the major generators of
foundry sand.
The most common casting process used in the foundry industry

is the sand cast system. Virtually all sand cast molds for ferrous castings
are of the green sand type. Green sand consists of high-quality silica
sand, about 10 percent bentonite clay (as the binder), 2 to 5 percent
water and about 5 percent sea coal (a carbonaceous mold additive to
improve casting finish). The type of metal being cast determines which
additives and what gradation of sand is used. The green sand used in the
process constitutes upwards of 90 percent of the molding materials
used.(1)
In addition to green sand molds, chemically bonded sand cast

systems are also used. These systems involve the use of one or more
organic binders (usually proprietary) in conjunction with catalysts and
different hardening/setting procedures. Foundry sand makes up about
97 percent of this mixture. Chemically bonded systems are most often
used for “cores” (used to produce cavities that are not practical to
produce by normal molding operations) and for molds for nonferrous
castings.

CONCRETE”
The annual generation of foundry waste (including dust and spent

foundry sand) in the United States is believed to range from 9 to 13.6
million metric tons (10 to 15 million tons).(2) Typically, about 1 ton of
foundry sand is required for each ton of iron or steel casting produced.
CURRENT MANAGEMENT OPTIONS
Recycling
In typical foundry processes, sand from collapsed molds or

cores can be reclaimed and reused. A simplified diagram depicting the
flow of sand in a typical green sand molding system is presented in
Figure 6.1. Some new sand and binder is typically added to maintain the
quality of the casting and to make up for sand lost during normal
operations.(3)

CONCRETE”
Figure 6-1. Simplified schematic of green sand mold system.
Little information is available regarding the amount of foundry

sand that is used for purposes other than in-plant reclamation, but
spent foundry sand has been used as a fine aggregate substitute in
construction applications and as kiln feed in the manufacture of Portland
cement.
Disposal
Most of the spent foundry sand from green sand operations is

landfilled, sometimes being used as a supplemental cover material at
landfill sites.
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
Chemical Properties
Spent foundry sand consists primarily of silica sand, coated with a

thin film of burnt carbon, residual binder (bentonite, sea coal, resins)
and dust. Table 7-2 lists the chemical composition of a typical sample of
spent foundry sand as determined by x-ray fluorescence.
Silica sand is hydrophilic and consequently attracts water to its

surface. This property could lead to moisture-accelerated damage and
associated stripping problems in an asphalt pavement. Antistripping
additives may be required to counteract such problems.
Depending on the binder and type of metal cast, the pH of spent

foundry sand can vary from approximately 4 to 8.(7) It has been reported
that some spent foundry sands can be corrosive to metals.(5)

CONCRETE”
Because of the presence of phenols in foundry sand, there is some

concern that precipitation percolating through stockpiles could mobilize
leachable fractions, resulting in phenol discharges into surface or ground
water supplies. Foundry sand sources and stockpiles must be monitored
to assess the need to establish controls for potential phenol
discharges.(4,6,7)
Table 6.1 Foundry sand sample chemical oxide composition, %. (1)
Constituent Value (%)

SiO2 87.91
Al2O3 4.70
Fe2O3 0.94
CaO 0.14
MgO 0.30
Na2O 0.19
K2O 0.25

CONCRETE”
CHAPTER 7
AIM OF EXPERIMENTATION
Self compacting concrete is a high performance concrete that can

flow under its own weight to completely fill the formwork without
segregation and self consolidate without any mechanical vibrations, even
in the presence of congested reinforcements. Such concrete can
accelerate placement and reduce labour required for consolidation and
finishing.
In other words, “Self compacting concrete is a highly flowable, yet
stable concrete that can spread readily into place and fill the formwork
without any consolidation and without undergoing any significance
separation”.
Self compacting concrete offers a rapid rate of concrete placement,
with faster construction times and ease of flow around congested
reinforcement. The fluidity and segregation resistance of self compacting
concrete ensures a high level of homogeneity, minimum concrete voids
and uniform concrete strength, providing the potential for a superior
level of finish and durability to the structure.
In addition following are some more points, which makes self
compacting concrete more reliable in concreting works-
Improved compaction around congested reinforcement.
Potential to enhance durability through improved compaction of
cover concrete.
Improved buildability (e.g.: concreting deep elements in single lifts).

CONCRETE”
Elimination of vibration leading to environmental, health and

safety benefits.
Quicker and easier concrete placement.
The field of concrete technology has seen miraculous changes due
to the invention of various admixtures. The admixtures modify the
properties of fresh concrete and offer many advantages to the user.
The main aim of this experimentation is to find out the effect

of addition of red mud, which is a waste product from the aluminium
industries, and foundry waste sand, which is a waste product from
foundry, on the properties of self compacting concrete containing two
admixtures. In this experimentation combinations of admixtures which is
taken-.
Super plasticizer + VMA.
The flow characteristics and strength characteristics of self
compacting concrete produced from different waste material and different
percentages of that material are found. The different percentages of red
mud used in experimentation are 0%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7% and
8% and The different percentages foundry waste used in experimentation
are 2%, 4%, 6%, 8%.

CONCRETE”
CHAPTER 8
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE AND TEST
RESULTS
8.1. GENERAL:
The main aim of this experimentation is to find out the

effect of addition of red mud, which is a waste product from the
aluminium industries, and foundry waste sand, which is a waste product
from foundry, on the properties of self compacting concrete containing
three admixtures. In this experimentation combinations of admixtures
which is taken-.
Super plasticizer + VMA.
The flow characteristics and strength characteristics of self
compacting concrete produced from different waste material and different
percentages of that material are found. The different percentages of red
mud used in experimentation are 0%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7% and
8% and The different percentages foundry waste used in experimentation
are 2%, 4%, 6%, 8%, 10%.
8.2. MATERIALS USED:

In the experimentation PPC was used. Locally available sand
and coarse aggregates were used. The specific gravity of sand was found
to be 2.55 and was Zone II sand. The specific gravity of coarse aggregates
CONCRETE”
used was found to be 2.61. The coarse aggregates were 12mm and down
size. The mix proportion adopted in the experimentation was 1:1:0.5 with
a water/binder ratio 0.31. The flyash/cement ratio used was 1:3.5.
The flyash used in the experimentation is pozzocrete 60 was
obtained from DIRK INDIA PRIVATE LTD. The chemical composition of
flyash is shown in the table 8.2a.
Table 8.2a: Chemical composition of flyash.

Oxides Percentages
SiO2+Al2O3+ Fe2O2 70 min

SiO2 35 min
Reactive silica 20 min
MgO 05 max
SO3 03 max
Na2O 1.5 max
Total chlorides 0.05 max
The red mud used in the experimentation was obtained from HINDALCO,
Belgaum. The fineness of red mud was found to be 35 m2/gm with
particle size of 75 microns and its density is found to be 3gm/cc. The
chemical composition of red mud is shown in table 8.2b.

CONCRETE”
Table 8.2b: Chemical composition of red mud

Chemical Bauxite residue Typical values
composition (%) worldwide (%)
Fe O 51 30-60
2 3
Al O 15 10-20
2 3
CO 13 2-8
a
SiO 10 3-50
2
Na O 0.20 2-10
The foundry
2 waste sand used in this experimentation was obtained from KOLH
Table 8.2c. Chemical composition of Foundry sand
Constituent Percentage (%)

SiO2 87.91
Al2O3 4.70
Fe2O3 0.94
CaO 0.14
MgO 0.30
Na2O 0.19
K2O 0.25
A viscosity modifying admixture called GLENIUM STREAM2 was

used to induce the flow without segregation. GLENIUM STREAM 2 is
dosed at the rate of 50 to 500ml/100Kg of cementitious material. Other
dosages may be recommended in special cases according to specific job
site conditions. GLENIUM STREAM 2 consists of a mixture of water
soluble polymers which is absorbed on to the surface of cement granules
thereby changing the viscosity of water and influencing the rheological
properties of the mix. It also resist the segregation due aggregation of the
CONCRETE”
polymer chains when the concrete is not moving. GLENIUM STREAM 2 is

a chloride free admixture. It should be added to the concrete after all the
other components of the mix. This is particularly important in order to
obtain maximum efficiency. It is a colourless free flowing liquid and
manufactured by BASF Construction Chemicals (India) Pvt. Ltd., Pune.
A high performance concrete superplasticizer based on modified
polycarboxylic ether was used in the experimentation. The trade name of
the superplasticizer is GLENIUMTM SKY 784. It greatly improves the
cement dispersion. It is manufactured by BASF Construction Chemicals
(India) Pvt. Ltd., Pune. Optimum dosage of GLENIUMTM SKY 784 should
be determined in trial mixes. As a guide a dosage range of 300ml to
1200ml per 100kg of cementitious material is normally recommended.
8.3. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
The cement, sand and coarse aggregates were weighed according to

the mix proportion 1:1:0.5. The flyash and cement proportion used in the
experimentation was 1:3.5. To this dry mix the required quantity of red
mud (0%,1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7% and 8%) was added and
homogenously mixed. To this dry mix the required quantity of water was
added and thoroughly mixed. To this the superplasticizer was added at
the rate of 700ml/100Kg of cementitious material and mixed intimately.
Now the viscosity modifying agent (VMA) was added at the rate of
100ml/100Kg of cementitious material. The entire mix was thoroughly
mixed once again. At this stage, almost the concrete was in a flowable
state. Now, the flow characteristic experiments for self compacting
concrete like slump flow test, orimet test, V-funnel test, L-box test and
U- box test were conducted.

CONCRETE”
After conducting the flow characteristic experiments the concrete

mix was poured in the moulds required for the strength assessment.
After pouring the concrete into the moulds, no compaction was given
either through vibrated or through hand compaction. Even the concrete
did not require any finishing operation. After 24 hours of casting, the
specimens were demoulded and were transferred to the curing tank
wherein they were allowed to cure for 28 days.
For compressive strength assessment, cubes of size
150mmX150mmX150mm were prepared. For tensile strength
assessment, cylinders of diameter 150mm and length 300mm were
prepared. Indirect tension test (Brazilian test or split tensile test), was
carried on these cylindrical specimens. For flexural strength assessment,
the beams of size 100mmX100mmX500mm were prepared and two point
loading on an effective span of 400mm was adopted
After 28 days of curing the specimens were tested for their
respectively strengths.
Same procedure is adopted for foundry waste sand. Instead of
red mud, required quantity of (2%, 4%, 6%, 8%, 10%) foundry waste
sand is used.

CONCRETE”
8.4. TEST RESULTS
RED MUD
TEST RESULTS OF SELF COMPACTING CONCRETE

CONTAINING THE COMBINATION OF ADMIXTURES
(SP+VMA)
The following tables give the test results of effect of addition of red
mud in various percentages on the properties of self compacting concrete
containing an admixture combination (SP+VMA)
Compressive strength test results of self compacting concrete

containing the combination of admixtures (SP+VMA) with various
percentages of red mud-
Table 8.1 Compressive strength of SCC with 0% red mud and with
combination of admixtures (SP+VMA)
Specimen Weight of Density Average Failure Compressive Average

identification specimen (N/cum) density Load strength compressive
(N) (N/cum) (KN) (MPa) strength
(MPa)

CONCRETE”
A1 82.4 24414.8 900 40.00

A2 81.8 24237.0 24079.0 930 41.33 40.59
A3 79.6 23585.2 910 40.44

(MPa)
B1 86.0 25481.5 960 42.67
B2 80.0 23703.7 24651.8 920 40.88 41.18
B3 83.6 24770.4 900 40.00

(MPa)
C1 82.2 24355.5 1020 45.33
C2 83.8 24829.6 24177.7 990 44.00 44.29
C3 78.8 23348.1 980 43.55

(MPa)
D1 84.0 24888.8 970 43.11
D2 81.2 24059.0 24533.0 930 41.33 42.66
D3 83.4 24711.1 980 43.55

CONCRETE”

(MPa)
E1 84.0 24888.8 930 41.33
E2 79.6 23585.1 24256.7 900 40.00 40.29
E3 82.0 24296.3 890 39.55

(MPa)
F1 84.00 24888.8 850 37.78
F2 82.60 24474.0 24355.7 870 38.66 37.62
F3 79.80 23644.4 820 36.44

(MPa)
G1 85.60 25362.9 790 35.11
G2 77.60 22992.6 24059.2 810 36.00 35.11
G3 80.40 23822.2 770 34.22

CONCRETE”

(MPa)
H1 83.20 24651.8 800 35.55
H2 84.00 24888.8 24592.5 780 34.66 34.51
H3 81.80 24237.0 750 33.33
Table8.9 Compressive strength of SCC with 8% red mud and with


(MPa)
I1 86.00 25481.5 760 33.77
I2 79.40 23525.9 24335.8 770 34.22 33.62
I3 81.00 24000.0 740 32.88
OVERALL RESULTS OF COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH

The following table no.8.10 gives the overall results of compressive
strength of self compacting concrete containing the combination of
admixtures (SP+VMA) for various percentage addition of red mud
Table 8.10 Overall Result of Compressive Strength
Percentage Compressive Percentage

addition of red strength (MPa) increase or
mud decrease of
compressive
CONCRETE”
strength w.r.t.
ref mix
0(Ref) 40.59 -
1 41.18 +1.45
2 44.29 +9.11
3 42.66 +5.10
4 40.29 -0.74
5 37.62 -7.32
6 35.11 -13.50
7 34.51 -14.98
8 33.62 -17.17
The variation of compressive strength can be depicted in the form of

graph as shown in figure.
The variation of compressive strength of SCC containing red mud

CONCRETE”
Tensile strength test results of self compacting concrete containing

the combination of admixtures (SP+VMA) with various percentages
of red mud-
Table 8.11 Tensile strength of SCC with 0% red mud and with
Specimen Failure load Tensile strength Average tensile

identification (KN) f=2P/ (MPa) strength (MPa)
A1 250 3.53
A2 240 3.39 3.34
A3 220 3.11

B1 320 4.52
B2 280 3.96 4.00
B3 250 3.53

CONCRETE”
Table8.13 Tensile strength of SCC with 2% red mud and with


C1 350 4.95
C2 300 4.24 4.62
C3 330 4.67

D1 230 3.25
D2 240 3.39 3.34
D3 240 3.39

E1 220 3.11
E2 240 3.39 3.25
E3 230 3.25


F1 220 3.11
F2 240 3.39 3.10
F3 200 2.82


CONCRETE”

G1 210 2.97
G2 200 2.82 2.87
G3 200 2.82

H1 160 2.26
H2 200 2.82 2.50
H3 170 2.41

I1 160 2.26
I2 170 2.40 2.16
I3 130 1.83
OVERALL RESULTS OF TENSILE STRENGTH
The following table no. 8.20 gives the overall results of tensile
admixtures(SP+VMA) for various percentage addition of red mud
Table 8.20 Overall Result of tensile Strength
Percentage Tensile Percentage

mud decrease of
tensile
strength w.r.t.
ref mix

CONCRETE”
0(Ref) 3.34 -
1 4.00 +19.76
2 4.62 +38.32
3 3.34 0
4 3.25 -2.69
5 3.10 -7.19
6 2.87 -14.07
7 2.50 -25.15
8 2.16 -35.33
The variation of tensile strength can be depicted in the form of graph as

shown in figure.
The variation of tensile strength of SCC containing red mud

CONCRETE”
Flexural strength test results of self compacting concrete containing

of red mud-
Table 8.21 Flexural strength of SCC with 0% red mud and with
Specimen Failure load Flexural strength Average flexural

identification (KN) f=PL/B (MPa) strength (MPa)
A1 10.0 5.00
A2 10.5 5.25 5.12
A3 10.2 5.10

B1 11.0 5.50 5.36
B2 10.6 5.30

CONCRETE”
B3 10.6 5.30

C1 11.4 5.70
C2 10.8 5.40 5.53
C3 11.0 5.50

D1 11.0 5.50
D2 11.2 5.60 5.50
D3 10.8 5.40

E1 10.9 5.45
E2 10.5 5.25 5.26
E3 10.2 5.10

F1 10.2 5.10
F2 10.4 5.20 5.15
F3 10.3 5.15

CONCRETE”

G1 10.1 5.05
G2 9.8 4.90 4.92
G3 9.0 4.80

H1 9.9 4.95
H2 9.4 4.70 4.83
H3 9.8 4.90

I1 9.4 4.70
I2 8.8 4.40 4.40
I3 8.2 4.10
OVERALL RESULTS OF FLEXURAL STRENGTH
The following table no.8.30 gives the overall results of flexural

admixtures (SP+VMA) for various percentage addition of red mud

CONCRETE”
Table 8.30 Overall Result of flexural Strength
Percentage Flexural Percentage

mud decrease of
tensile
strength w.r.t.
ref mix
0(Ref) 5.12 -
1 5.36 +4.69
2 5.53 +8.01
3 5.50 +7.12
4 5.26 +2.73
5 5.15 +0.59
6 4.92 -3.91
7 4.83 -5.66
8 4.40 -14.06
The variation of flexural strength can be depicted in the form of graph as

shown in figure.

CONCRETE”
The variation of flexural strength of SCC containing red mud
FLOW TEST RESULTS

CONCRETE”
The following tables give the flow test results of effect of addition of
red mud in various percentages on the properties of self compacting
concrete containing an admixtures combination of (SP+VMA)
Table 8.31 Slump Flow Test Results
Percentage of red Slump flow (mm) Time in sec T50

mud
0 680 4.9
1 700 4.7
2 720 4.3
3 710 4.6
4 680 5.3
5 650 5.8
6 630 8.6
7 590 12.4
8 560 13.2
Table 8.32 V - Funnel Test Results
Percentage of Flow time sec

red mud
0 33.10
1 24.61
2 18.70
3 32.80
4 34.60
5 36.80
6 42.00
7 52.80
8 66.54

CONCRETE”
Table 8.33 U - Box Test Results
Percentage of Height of conc. Height of conc. Filling height

red mud In 1st In 2st H1-H2 (mm)
compartment compartment
H1 (mm) H2 (mm)
0 290 290 0
1 290 290 0
2 290 290 0
3 290 285 5
4 290 285 5
5 290 280 10
6 290 280 10
7 290 275 15
8 290 270 20
Table 8.34 L - Box Test Results
Percentage Height H1 Height H2 Blocking Time Time

of red mud ratio H2 taken for taken for
/H1 conc. To conc. To
reach a reach a
distance distance
of 200 of 400
mm (T20) mm (T40)
sec sec
0 80 65 0.812 9.24 15.8
1 75 66 0.88 6.30 10.2
2 80 76.8 0.96 3.80 6.5
3 70 60 0.85 4.60 8.8
4 72 60 0.83 5.20 9.2
5 70 55 0.78 5.50 11.2
6 80 48 0.60 6.30 13.4
7 82 32 0.39 7.20 15.6
8 95 15.2 0.16 9.40 25.2

CONCRETE”
OVERALL RESULTS OF FLOW PROPERTIES
Overall flow test results of effect of addition of red mud in various

percentages on the properties of self compacting concrete containing an
admixtures combination of (SP+VMA)
Table 8.35 Overall Test Results
Percentage Slump Slump V– U – box L –box

of red mud flow test funnel Filling
(mm) (sec) flow height Blocking (T20) (T40)
time H1-H2 ratio sec sec
sec (mm) H2 /H1
0 680 4.9 33.10 0 0.812 9.24 15.8
1 700 4.7 24.61 0 0.88 6.30 10.2
2 720 4.3 18.70 0 0.96 3.80 6.5
3 710 4.6 32.80 5 0.85 4.60 8.8
4 680 5.3 34.60 5 0.83 5.20 9.2
5 650 5.8 36.80 10 0.78 5.50 11.2
6 630 8.6 42.00 10 0.60 6.30 13.4
7 590 12.4 52.80 15 0.39 7.20 15.6
8 560 13.2 66.54 20 0.16 9.40 25.2

CONCRETE”
FOUNDRY WASTE SAND
TEST RESULTS OF SELF COMPACTING CONCRETE

CONTAINING THE COMBINATION OF ADMIXTURES
(SP+VMA)
The following tables give the test results of effect of addition of
foundry waste sand in various percentages on the properties of self
compacting concrete containing an admixture combination (SP+VMA)
Compressive strength test results of self compacting concrete

containing the combination of admixtures (SP+VMA) with various
percentages of foundry waste sand-
Table 8.36 Compressive strength of SCC with 0% foundry waste

sand and with combination of admixtures (SP+VMA)

(MPa)
A1 82.4 24414.8 900 40.00
A2 81.8 24237.0 24079.0 930 41.33 40.59
A3 79.6 23585.2 910 40.44


(MPa)
J1 84.4 25007.4 970 42.03
J2 81.4 24118.5 25146.6 990 42.90 42.03
J3 88.8 26311.1 950 41.17

CONCRETE”


(MPa)
K1 81.6 24117.6 930 40.30
K2 84.0 24888.8 25046.6 910 39.43 40.15
K3 88.2 26133.3 940 40.73


(MPa)
L1 82.4 24114.8 850 36.83
L2 81.8 24237.0 24077.8 900 39.00 37.70
L3 80.6 23881.5 860 37.27


(MPa)
M1 88.6 26251.8 800 34.67
M2 87.2 25837.0 25560.4 820 35.53 35.68
M3 83.0 24592.3 850 36.83

CONCRETE”
OVERALL RESULTS OF COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
The following table no. 8.41 gives the overall results of compressive
admixtures(SP+VMA) for various percentage addition of foundry waste
sand
Table 8.41 Overall Result of Compressive Strength
Percentage Compressive Percentage

addition of strength (MPa) increase or
foundry waste decrease of
sand compressive
strength w.r.t.
ref mix
0(Ref) 40.59 -
2 42.03 +3.55
4 40.15 -1.08
6 37.70 -7.12
8 35.68 -12.10

CONCRETE”
The variation of compressive strength can be depicted in the form of

graph as shown in figure.
The variation of compressive strength of SCC containing foundry waste

sand

CONCRETE”
Tensile strength test results of self compacting concrete containing

of foundry waste sand -
Table 8.42 Tensile strength of SCC with 0% foundry waste sand

and with combination of admixtures (SP+VMA)

A1 250 3.53
A2 240 3.39 3.34
A3 220 3.11


J1 290 4.10
J2 280 3.96 3.86
J3 250 3.54


K1 240 3.39
K2 210 2.97 3.25
K3 240 3.39

CONCRETE”


L1 210 2.97
L2 180 2.54 2.73
L3 190 2.68

M1 150 2.12
M2 140 1.98 1.93
M3 120 1.70

CONCRETE”
OVERALL RESULTS OF TENSILE STRENGTH
The following table no.8.47 gives the overall results of tensile

admixtures(SP+VMA) for various percentage addition of foundry waste
sand
Table 8.47 Overall Result of tensile Strength
Percentage Tensile Percentage

sand tensile
strength w.r.t.
ref mix
0(Ref) 3.34 -
2 3.86 +4.66
4 3.25 -2.69
6 2.73 -18.26
8 1.93 -42.22

CONCRETE”
The variation of tensile strength can be depicted in the form of graph as

shown in figure.
The variation of tensile strength of SCC containing foundry waste sand

CONCRETE”
Flexural strength test results of self compacting concrete containing

of foundry waste sand –
Table 8.48 Flexural strength of SCC with 0% foundry waste sand


A1 10.0 5.00
A2 10.5 5.25 5.12
A3 10.2 5.10


J1 10.4 5.20
J2 10.5 5.25 5.27
J3 10.7 5.35


K1 10.2 5.10 5.01
K2 9.8 4.90

CONCRETE”
K3 10.1 5.05


L1 9.0 4.50
L2 9.5 4.75 4.63
L3 9.3 4.65


M1 9.0 4.50
M2 9.1 4.55 4.48
M3 8.8 4.40
OVERALL RESULTS OF FLEXURAL STRENGTH
The following table no. 8.53 gives the overall results of flexural
admixtures (SP+VMA) for various percentage addition of foundry waste
sand
Table 8.53 Overall Result of flexural Strength
Percentage Flexural Percentage

sand tensile
strength w.r.t.
ref mix
0(Ref) 5.12 -
2 5.27 +2.92

CONCRETE”
4 5.01 -2.15
6 4.63 -9.57
8 4.48 -12.5
The variation of flexural strength can be depicted in the form of graph as

shown in figure.
The variation of flexural strength of SCC containing red mud

CONCRETE”
FLOW TEST RESULTS
The following tables give the flow test results of effect of addition of
red mud in various percentages on the properties of self compacting
concrete containing an admixtures combination of (SP+VMA)
Table 8.54 Slump Flow Test Results
Percentage of foundry Slump flow (mm) Time in sec T50

waste sand
0 680 4.9
2 730 4.1
4 680 5.3
6 610 9.7
8 530 14.1
Table 8.55 V - Funnel Test Results
Percentage of Flow time sec

foundry waste sand
0 33.10
2 18.10
4 33.00
6 45.30
8 79.80

CONCRETE”
Table 8.56 U - Box Test Results
Percentage of Height of conc. Height of conc. Filling height

foundry waste In 1st In 2st H1-H2 (mm)
sand compartment compartment
H1 (mm) H2 (mm)
0 290 290 0
2 290 290 0
4 290 280 10
6 290 275 15
8 290 270 20
Table 8.57 L - Box Test Results
Percentage Height H1 Height H2 Blocking Time Time taken

of foundry ratio H2 taken for for conc. To
waste sand /H1 conc. To reach a
reach a distance of
distance 400 mm
of 200 (T40) sec
mm (T20)
sec
0 80 65 0.812 9.24 15.8
2 70 65 0.92 3.98 7.68
4 65 60 0.92 5.32 9.98
6 70 60 0.85 5.80 11.68
8 70 30 0.43 8.98 17.92
OVERALL RESULTS OF FLOW PROPERTIES
Overall flow test results of effect of addition of red mud in various

percentages on the properties of self compacting concrete containing an
admixtures combination of (SP+VMA)
Table 8.58 Overall Test Results

CONCRETE”
Percentage Slump Slump V– U – box L –box

of foundry flow test funnel Filling
waste sand (mm) (sec) flow height Blocking (T20) (T40)
time H1-H2 ratio sec sec
sec (mm) H2 /H1
0 680 4.9 33.10 0 0.812 9.24 15.8
2 730 4.1 18.10 0 0.92 3.98 7.68
4 680 5.3 33.00 10 0.92 5.32 9.98
6 610 9.7 45.30 15 0.85 5.80 11.68
8 530 14.1 79.80 20 0.43 8.98 17.92
CHAPTER 9
COST COMPARISON
Cost comparison between SCC and SCC after blending of cement:
From the above results and graph plotted which will give
the optimum percentage for the foundry waste sand 2% and red mud
2%.
Cost analysis:
Particulars Rates(Rs.)
Rate of Cement per bag 280/-
Crushed Sand: Rate/ Cum 700/-
12mm aggregate/ Cum 500/-
Rate of Superplasticizer/kg 150/-
Rate of VMA/ kg 80/-
Red Mud/Ton 300/-
FWS/Ton 200/-
other 350/-

CONCRETE”
It observed from the cost analysis the cost of conventional

concrete is Rs.4090/cum and cost of concrete with blending by
optimum percentages of foundry waste and red mud are
Rs.4040/cum. and Rs.4045/cum. respectively.
Because of these results we conclude that, the SCC with
blending by red mud and foundry waste sand which are
industrial wastages causing hazards to the ecosystem enhance
the strength and reduces the cost than the normal SCC.
CHAPTER 10
CONCLUSIONS
In present scenario there is a greater need for self compacting concrete
due to sickness of member and architectural requirement, also to
improve durability of the structure.
Now the world is going to facing greater need of high performance
concrete, durability point of view and SCC where the conventional way of
compacting may not be always useful under different site condition. So
instead of going for the conventional concrete let us mix the concrete
compacting on its own which is called as self compacting concrete.
Now due to industrialisation there is greater increase in the foundry
activity in at around Satara district, mainly in case of Kolhapur area.
Similarly there is big project near Kolhapur of foundry sand. Hidalgo
there is huge amount of Red mud is produced every day and dumped on
the ground it is threat environment.
This waste is used for dumping for filling the low lying areas
causing the environment in deterioration in long run, so this mix should
be used for the construction activity it will reduce the problem of

CONCRETE”
environmental pollution at the same time it reduces the cost of the

construction and add it makes the concrete high performing from the
durability point of view. So from these three points the project is under
taken.
Based on the experimentation conducted, the following observations were
made and hence some conclusions.
It has been observed that the compressive strength of self compacting
concrete produced with the combination of admixtures such as
(SP+VMA) goes on increasing up to 2% addition of red mud. After 2%
addition of red mud, the compressive strength starts decreasing, i.e. the
compressive strength of self compacting concrete produced with
(SP+VMA) is maximum when 2% red mud is added. The percentage
increase in the compressive strength at 2% addition of red mud is +9.11
Thus, it can be concluded that maximum compressive strength of self
compacting concrete with the combination of admixtures (SP+VMA) may
be obtained by adding 2% red mud which is a waste material from
aluminum industry.
It has been observed that the compressive strength of self compacting
concrete produced with the combination of admixtures such as
(SP+VMA) goes on increasing upto 2% addition of foundry waste sand.
After 2% addition of foundry waste sand, the compressive strength starts
decreasing, i.e. the compressive strength of self compacting concrete
produced with (SP+VMA) is maximum when 2% foundry waste sand is
added. The percentage increase in the compressive strength at 2%
addition of foundry waste sand.
Thus, it can be concluded that maximum compressive strength of self

compacting concrete with the combination of admixtures (SP+VMA) may

CONCRETE”
be obtained by adding 2% foundry waste sand which is a waste material

of ferrous industry (foundry).
CHAPTER 11
SCOPE FOR FURTHER STUDY
The following experimental studies can be conducted in future with

respect to self compacting concrete-
The effect of addition of red mud/foundry waste sand on the

durability characteristics of self compacting concrete containing
more than three admixtures.
The effect of high temperature on the properties of self compacting
concrete containing more than three admixtures with red
mud/foundry waste sand.
The effect of addition of red mud/foundry waste sand on the
shrinkage and the creep properties of self compacting concrete
containing more than two admixtures.

CONCRETE”
Similarly there are lot more mineral admixtures which are the
wastage of the industry. The other type of ingredients wastages
used for manufacturer of concrete to reduce the problems of
environmental attack.

CONCRETE”
REFERENCES
CHAMPION, J. M. and JOST, P., 'Self-compacting concrete:

Expanding the possibility of Concrete Design and Placement',
Concrete International, Vol.22, No.4, pp. 159-178, June 1998.
HEINE, HANS J. "Saving Dollars Through Sand Reclamation - Part
1," Foundry Management and Technology. 111:5 (May, 1983), pp.
22-25
HENDERSON, N. "Self-compacting concrete at Millenium point",
CONCRETE, vol.34, No. 4, April 2000, pp.26-27.
KAMESWARA RAO, C.V.S (1983) "Analysis of Some Common
Workability Tests". Indian Concrete Journal, 57 (3): 71-73 and 75.
KATHY STANFIELD, "Self-compacting concrete a Growth area", The
Str.Engg., Vol. 76, Nos 23 and 24, pp. 462-463.
NAGATAKI, S. and FUJIWARA, H. "Self-compacting property of
Highly-Flowable Concrete" ICI Journal July-September 2002.
KLAUS HOLSCHEMACHER, "Structural Aspects of Self-
compacting concrete", NBM & CW, July 2002, pp. 8-12.
MAHINDRAKAR A.B. Research work Study on Red Mud by,
KLESCET, Belgaum, 1999 .
MEHTA, P.K., 'Concrete structure: Properties and materials',
Prentice Hall, pp. 367-378, 1986. ICI Journal July-Sep 2002.
MICHEAL J. CAMPION and PHILLIPPE JOST, "Self-compacting
concrete", Concrete Int. 2000, pp. 31-34.
OKAMURA, H (1997), "Self-Compacting High Performance
concrete", Concrete International, Vol. 19, No. 7, pp-50-54.
OKAMURA. H. and OUCHI. M, "Self Compacting Concrete -
Development, present use and future", Ist International RILEM

CONCRETE”
Symposium on Self Compacting Concrete, 1999, Concrete

International pg 3-14.
OKAMURA, H., OZAWA, K. and OUCHI, M. "Self-compacting
concrete. Structural concrete". 1, No.l, March 3-17,2000.
SHETTY. M. S. Concrete Technology, by S. CHAND Publisher.
SUBRAMNIAN. S., CHATTOPADHYAY. D, "Experiments for mix-
proportioning of self compacting concrete", The Indian Concrete
Journal, Jan 2002.
TAKEUCHI. H., HIGUCHI. M., and NANNI. A. "Application of
flowable concrete in Tunnel lining", Concrete International. Vol 16.
No. 4, April 1994. Pp.26-29.
WEBSITES:-
www.acclimited.com
www.pozzocrete.co.in
www.hindalco.com
www.redmudproject.org
www.tfhrc.gov/hnr20/recycle/waste/fs1.htm

Project Report On Self Compacting Concrete

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Project Report On Self Compacting Concrete

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Project Report On Self Compacting Concrete

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What is the project report about?

What is the project report about?

What materials were used in the project?

What materials were used in the project?

A

Mr. Suraj N. Shah. Miss. Shweta S. Sutar.

UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING,

Mr. Suraj N. Shah. Miss. Shweta S. Sutar.

has completed the project work entitled.

“Application of Industrial Waste in Self Compacting

This work is being submitted for the award of degree of

It is indeed pleasure and a moment of satisfaction for us to express our gratitude

2. NEED FOR SCC

5. SCC AND MESUREMENT OF IT’S FLOW PROPERTIES

6. RED MUD AND FOUNDRY WASTE SAND

GOVT. COLLEGE OF ENGG. KARAD 4

Self-compacting concrete (SCC) is an innovative concrete that

GOVT. COLLEGE OF ENGG. KARAD 5

GOVT. COLLEGE OF ENGG. KARAD 6

GOVT. COLLEGE OF ENGG. KARAD 7

GOVT. COLLEGE OF ENGG. KARAD 8

(material<0.1mm) ratio and provide adequate segregation resistance.

Foundry sand and red mud has pozzolanic properties

GOVT. COLLEGE OF ENGG. KARAD 9

So it should be used in some constructive fashion. Which is going to

For several years, the problem of the durability of concrete

GOVT. COLLEGE OF ENGG. KARAD 10

The properties, such as, fluidity and high resistance to segregation

GOVT. COLLEGE OF ENGG. KARAD 11

Foundry waste basically contents (contains) uniformly sized, and

2. Environmental & Human Health Protection:

GOVT. COLLEGE OF ENGG. KARAD 12

SCC gives noise protection in precast industry, by introducing no

GOVT. COLLEGE OF ENGG. KARAD 13

6. It gives wide opportunity for the use of high-volumes of by

In spite of above all, following are the some of the disadvantages of

GOVT. COLLEGE OF ENGG. KARAD 14

SCC is costlier than conventional concrete initially based on

GOVT. COLLEGE OF ENGG. KARAD 15

3.1.2Aggregates:- The maximum size of aggregate is generally limited

3.1.3 Mixing water: - Ordinary potable water of normally pH 7 is

3.1.4 Admixtures for SCC:-An admixture is a material other than

GOVT. COLLEGE OF ENGG. KARAD 16

Admixtures ranging from additions of chemicals to waste materials

GOVT. COLLEGE OF ENGG. KARAD 17

The proposed viscosity modifying admixture is high molecular

3.1.4.1 Chemical Admixtures:-

Viscosity Modifying Agent (VMA)

GOVT. COLLEGE OF ENGG. KARAD 18

3.1.4.2 Mineral Admixtures:

GOVT. COLLEGE OF ENGG. KARAD 19

4.1 Fresh SCC Properties

GOVT. COLLEGE OF ENGG. KARAD 20

GOVT. COLLEGE OF ENGG. KARAD 21

In considering these tests, there are number of points which

GOVT. COLLEGE OF ENGG. KARAD 22

Different test values may be appropriate for concrete being placed

5.2. TEST METHODS