Biogas
Biogas
Biogas
PRODUCED BY
VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY (AUSTRIA), Institute of Chemical Engineering Research Divison Thermal Process Engineering and Simulation AS PART DELIVERY OF:
Promotion of bio-methane and its market development through local and regional partnerships A project under the Intelligent Energy Europe programme
Contract Number: IEE/10/130 Deliverable Reference: Task 3.1.1 Delivery Date: May 2012
The sole responsibility for the content of this report lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Union. Neither the EACI nor the European Commission are responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.
Content
1. 2. Introduction and Overview ............................................................................................................. 3 Raw biogas desulphurisation technologies..................................................................................... 4 2.1. 2.2. 2.3. 2.4. 3. In-situ desulphurisation: Sulphide precipitation..................................................................... 4 Biological desulphurisation: biological scrubbing ................................................................... 5 Chemical-oxidative scrubbing ................................................................................................. 6 Adsorption on metal oxides or activated carbon ................................................................... 7
Biogas upgrading and biomethane production technologies ......................................................... 7 3.1. Absorption .............................................................................................................................. 8 Physical absorption: Pressurised water scrubbing ......................................................... 8 Organic physical absorption ............................................................................................ 9 Chemical absorption: amine scrubbing .......................................................................... 9
Adsorption: Pressure swing adsorption (PSA) ...................................................................... 10 Membrane technology: Gaspermeation............................................................................... 11 Comparison of different biogas upgrading technologies...................................................... 12 Removal of trace components: water, ammonia, siloxanes, particulates............................ 14
biomethane
raw biogas
offgas
Figure 1: Basic flowsheet of biogas upgrading The raw biogas basically is split into two gas streams during biogas upgrading: the methane-rich biomethane stream and the carbon-dioxide-rich offgas stream. As no separation technology is perfect, this waste-gas stream still contains a certain amount of methane depending on the methane Task 3.1.1 TUV May 2012 Page 3
Biogas to Biomethane Technology Review recovery of the applied technology. Whether this gas stream is legally permitted to be vented to the atmosphere or has to be further treated is depending on the methane content, on the methane slip of the upgrading plant (amount of methane in the offgas related to the amount of methane in the raw biogas) and on the legal situation at the plant site. The following sections will describe the technologies available for the most important tasks in biogas upgrading (desulphurisation, removal of carbon dioxide, drying). The removal of trace components will be discussed briefly and the possibilities of offgas treatment will be presented at the end of this section. The following table contains typical gas compositions of biogas and landfill gas and these values are compared to Danish natural gas. The quality of this natural gas seems to be quite representative for available natural gas qualities throughout Europe. Parameter Methane [vol%] Other hydrocarbons [vol%] Hydrogen [vol%] Carbon dioxide [vol%] Nitrogen [vol%] Oxygen [vol%] Hydrogen sulphide [ppmv] Ammonia [ppmv] Lower heating value [kWh/m(STP)] Biogas 60-70 0 0 30-40 up to 1 up to 0,5 0-4000 up to 100 6,5 Landfill gas 35-65 0 0-3 15-50 5-40 0-5 0-100 up to 5 4,4 Natural gas (Danish) 89 9,4 0 0,67 0,28 0 2,9 0 11,0
Biogas to Biomethane Technology Review sulphide is removed from the fermentation together with the digestate. Additionally to the removal of hydrogen sulphide also ammonia can be removed from the biogas using this technology. Furthermore, it has been reported that an improvement of the liquid milieu for the involved microorganisms can be achieved because of the reduction of toxic substances in the medium. This effect results in an increasing methane yield. Sulphide precipitation is a relatively cheap desulphurisation method with almost no investment needs. Existing anaerobic digestion plants can be retrofitted with ease and the operation, monitoring and handling is uncomplicated. On the other hand, the degree of desulphurisation is hardly controllable and pro-active measures are not possible. The effectiveness and the achievable biogas quality regarding hydrogen sulphide are clearly limited. This technique is typically used in digesters with high hydrogen sulphide concentrations as a first measure together with subsequent desulphurisation stages or in cases where high amounts of hydrogen sulphide in the biogas are allowed. The application of this technology to biomethane production is advantageous if: Hydrogen sulphide content in untreated biogas would otherwise be moderate or high Substrates utilised for biogas production are well known and sulphur potential is known No additional investment costs are desired This technology is advantageous in many cases of biogas and biomethane production as it is cheap and reliable. Furthermore, a certain supply of nutrients and trace components can be facilitated.
desulphurised biogas
scrubbing column
raw biogas air or pure oxygen fresh water
effluent
Figure 2: Flowsheet of a biological scrubbing plant for raw biogas desulphurisation; picture of the biological scrubber at the biogas plant Bruck/Leitha, Austria with a raw biogas capacity of 800m/h (Source: Vienna University of Technology, Biogas Bruck GmbH) The application of this technology to biomethane production is advantageous if: Hydrogen sulphide content in raw biogas is low or moderate Fluctuations in hydrogen sulphide content of raw biogas are weak Substrates utilised for biogas production are not changing frequently Nitrogen input to biogas is unobjectionable for further biogas upgrading or Pure oxygen is easily accessible for oxidation purposes instead of air Biological scrubber is already available at biogas plant and operation has to be switched to pure oxygen only
desulphurised biogas
caustic oxidiser
scrubbing column
raw biogas fresh water effluent
Figure 3: Flowsheet of a chemical-oxidative scrubbing plant for raw biogas desulphurisation; pictures of the chemical-oxidative scrubber at the biogas plant Bruck/Leitha, Austria with a raw biogas capacity of 300m/h (Source: Vienna University of Technology, Biogas Bruck GmbH) The application of this technology to biomethane production is advantageous if: Hydrogen sulphide content in raw biogas is moderate or high Fluctuations in hydrogen sulphide content of raw biogas are moderate or high Substrates utilised for biogas production are changing frequently or often Any addition of oxygen or nitrogen to raw biogas is disadvantageous for further biogas upgrading Highly automated and reliable operation and low labour efforts are desired Handling with chemical agents is no operational obstacle for personnel
Biogas to Biomethane Technology Review the raw biogas will be discussed. Typically, these removal steps are already included in any commercially available biogas upgrading plant.
3.1. Absorption
The separation principle of absorption is based on different solubilities of various gas components in a liquid scrubbing solution. In an upgrading plant using this technique the raw biogas is intensively contacted with a liquid within a scrubbing column filled with a plastic packing in order to increase the contact area between the phases. The components to be removed from the biogas (mostly carbon dioxide) are typically far more soluble in the applied liquid than methane and are removed from the gas stream. As a result, the remaining gas stream is enriched with methane and the scrubbing liquid leaving the column is rich in carbon dioxide. In order to maintain the absorption performance, this scrubbing liquid has to be replaced by fresh liquid or regenerated in a separated step (desorption or regeneration step). Currently, three different upgrading technologies embodying this physical principle are available. 3.1.1. Physical absorption: Pressurised water scrubbing The absorbed gas components are physically bound to the scrubbing liquid, in this case water. Carbon dioxide has a higher solubility in water than methane and will therefore be dissolved to a higher extend, particularly at lower temperatures and higher pressures. In addition to carbon dioxide, also hydrogen sulphide and ammonia can be reduced in the biomethane stream using water as a scrubbing liquid. The effluent water leaving the column is saturated with carbon dioxide and is transferred to a flash tank where the pressure is abruptly reduced and the major share of the dissolved gas is released. As this gas mainly contains carbon dioxide, but also a certain amount of methane (methane is also soluble in water, but to a smaller extent) this gas is piped to the raw biogas inlet. If the water is to be recycled back to the absorption column, it has to be regenerated and is therefore pumped to a desorption column where it meets a counter current flow of stripping air, into which the remaining dissolved carbon dioxide is released. The regenerated water is then pumped back to the absorber as fresh scrubbing liquid.
biomethane
drying
offgas
absorption column
raw biogas
desorption column
stripping air
compressor
Figure 4: Flowsheet of a typical biogas upgrading unit applying pressurised water scrubbing; picture of the upgrading plant Knnern, Germany with a raw biogas capacity of 1250m/h (Source: Malmberg) Task 3.1.1 TUV May 2012 Page 8
Biogas to Biomethane Technology Review The drawback of this method is that the air components oxygen and nitrogen are dissolved in the water during regeneration and thus, transported to the upgraded biomethane gas stream. Therefore, biomethane produced with this technology always contains oxygen and nitrogen. As the produced biomethane stream is saturated with water, the final step in upgrading typically is gas drying, for example by the application of glycol scrubbing. The application of this technology to biomethane production is advantageous if: Oxygen and nitrogen content in biomethane together with a reduced heating value is tolerable Projected plant capacity is medium or large Biomethane stream can directly be utilised at delivery pressure and no further compression is needed Heat demand of the biogas plant can be (partly) covered by offgas treatment 3.1.2. Organic physical absorption Very similar to water scrubbing, this technology uses an organic solvent solution (e.d. polyethylene glycol) instead of water as a scrubbing liquid. Carbon dioxide shows higher solubilities in these solvents than in water. As a result, less scrubbing liquid circulation and smaller apparatuses are needed for the same raw biogas capacity. Examples of commercially available biogas upgrading technologies implementing organic physical scrubbing are Genosorb , Selexol , Sepasolv , Rektisol and Purisol . 3.1.3. Chemical absorption: amine scrubbing Chemical absorption is characterised by a physical absorption of the gaseous components in a scrubbing liquid followed by a chemical reaction between scrubbing liquid components and absorbed gas components within the liquid phase. As a result, the bonding of unwanted gas components to the scrubbing liquid is significantly stronger and the loading capacity of the scrubbing liquid is several times higher. The chemical reaction is strongly selective and the amount of methane also absorbed in the liquid is very low resulting in very high methane recovery and very low methane slip. Due to the high affinity of especially carbon dioxide to the used solvents (mainly aqueous solutions of Monoethanolamine MEA, Diethanolamine DEA and Methyldiethanolamine MDEA) the operating pressure of amine scrubbers can be kept significantly smaller compared to pressurised water scrubbing plants of similar capacity. Typically, amine scrubbing plants are operated at the slightly elevated pressure already provided in the raw biogas and no further compression is needed. The high capacity and high selectivity of the amine solution, although an advantage during absorption, turns out to be a disadvantage during the regeneration of the scrubbing solution. Chemical scrubbing liquids require a significantly increased amount of energy during regeneration which has to be provided as process heat. The loaded amine solution is heated up to about 160C where most of the carbon dioxide is released and leaves the regeneration column as a considerably pure offgas stream. As a small part of the scrubbing liquid is lost to the produced biomethane due to evaporation, it has to be replenished frequently. Hydrogen sulphide could also be absorbed from the raw biogas by chemical absorption but higher temperatures during regeneration would be needed. That is why it is advisable to remove this component prior to the amine scrubber.
biomethane
absorption column
desorption column
offgas
raw biogas
Figure 5: Flowsheet of a typical biogas upgrading unit applying amine scrubbing; picture of the upgrading plant Gothenburg, Sweden with a raw biogas capacity of 1600m/h (Source: Cirmac) The application of this technology to biomethane production is advantageous if: High methane recovery is desired and consequently, no further offgas treatment to reduce the methane emissions is necessary High methane content of biomethane stream is desired Projected plant capacity is medium or large Biomethane stream can be utilised at the almost atmospheric delivery pressure and no further compression is needed Heat demand of regeneration step can be covered by infrastructure available at biogas plant
biomethane
raw biogas
compressor
P-140
P-155
P-88
offgas
Figure 6: Flowsheet of a typical biogas upgrading unit applying pressure swing adsorption; picture of the upgrading plant Mhlacker, Germany with a raw biogas capacity of 1000m/h (Source: Schmack CARBOTECH) The application of this technology to biomethane production is advantageous if: Methane content of biomethane stream (95,0-99,0vol%) is suitable for further utilisation Projected plant capacity is small or medium Biomethane stream can directly be utilised at delivery pressure and no further compression is needed Heat demand of the biogas plant can be (partly) covered by offgas treatment
compressor
raw biogas
biomethane
Figure 7: Flowsheet of a typical biogas upgrading unit applying the membrane technology gaspermeation; picture of the upgrading plant Kisslegg, Germany with a raw biogas capacity of 500m/h (Source: AXIOM Angewandte Prozesstechnik) The application of this technology to biomethane production is advantageous if: High flexibility towards process layout and adaption to the local biogas production facility as well as flexible partial load behaviour and plant dynamics are desired Methane content of biomethane stream (95,0-99,0vol%) is suitable for further utilisation Projected plant capacity is small or medium Biomethane stream can directly be utilised at delivery pressure and no further compression is needed Heat demand of the biogas plant can be (partly) covered by offgas treatment or Additional chemicals and other consumables have to be avoided Fast Start-up from cold standby and Start/Stop operation have to be realised
Biogas to Biomethane Technology Review Membrane technology offers the possibility to widely adapt the plant layout to the local circumstances by the application of different membrane configurations, multiple membrane stages and multiple compressor variations. This is why a certain range is given for most of the parameters. The first number always corresponds to the simpler plant layout (cheaper and with low methane recovery) while the other number corresponds to a high recovery plant layout. Parameter Water scrubbing Organic physical scrubbing Amine scrubbing PSA Membrane technology
typical plant size range [m/h biomethane] typical methane content in biomethane [vol%] methane recovery [%] methane slip [%] typical delivery pressure [bar(g)] electric energy demand [kWhel/m biomethane] heating demand and temperature level desulphurisation requirements consumables demand 95,0-99,0 98,0 2,0 4-8 0,46 process dependent antifouling agent, drying agent 50-100 high 95,0-99,0 96,0 4,0 4-8 0,49-0,67 medium 70-80C yes organic solvent (nonhazardous) 50-100 low >99,0 99,96 0,04 0 0,27 high 120-160C yes amine solution (hazardous, corrosive) 50-100 medium 95,0-99,0 98 2,0 4-7 0,46 yes activated carbon (nonhazardous) 85-115 high 50-105 low 95,0-99,0 80-99,5 20-0,5 4-7 0,25-0,43 yes
partial load range [%] number of reference plants typical investment costs [/(m/h) biomethane] for 100m/h biomethane for 250m/h biomethane for 500m/h biomethane typical operational costs [ct/m biomethane] for 100m/h biomethane for 250m/h biomethane for 500m/h biomethane
Biogas to Biomethane Technology Review basis. These systems provide stable combustion even at methane contents of as low as 3% in the combustion mixture with air. The treatment of offgas containing even less methane is increasingly difficult as not enough energy is provided during the combustion of this gas and raw biogas or biomethane have to be added in order to reach a stable oxidation. This is why it does not make sense to choose an upgrading technology with a methane recovery as high as possible because you always have to deal with the offgas. The integration of the upgrading plant into the biogas production facility and the overall concept of the biomethane production site are much more important. Only very few upgrading technologies with extremely high methane recoveries provide an offgas that is permitted to be directly vented to the atmosphere.
5. Sources
"Abschlussbericht Verbundprojekt Biogaseinspeisung, Band 4" Fraunhofer-Institut fuer Umwelt-, Sicherheits- und Energietechnik UMSICHT Urban, Lohmann, Girod; Germany, 2009 www.umsicht.fraunhofer.de "Biogas upgrading technologies - developments and innovations" IEA Bioenergy Task 37 - Energy from biogas and landfill gas Peterson, Wellinger; Sweden & Switzerland, 2009 www.iea-biogas.net "Biogas upgrading to vehicle fuel standards and grid injection" IEA Bioenergy Task 37 - Energy from biogas and landfill gas Persson, Jnsson, Wellinger; Sweden & Switzerland, 2006 www.iea-biogas.net "Biogas upgrading and utilisation" IEA Bioenergy Task 24 - Energy from biological conversion of organic waste Lindberg, Wellinger; Sweden & Switzerland, 2006 www.iea-biogas.net "Techniques for transformation of biogas to biomethane" Biomass and Bioenergy 35 (2011) 1633-1645 Ryckebosch, Drouillon, Vervaeren; 2011 www.journals.elsevier.com/biomass-and-bioenergy "Membrane biogas upgrading processes for the production of natural gas substitute" Separation and Purification Technology 74 (2010) 8392 Makaruk, Miltner, Harasek; 2010 www.journals.elsevier.com/separation-and-purification-technology "Chemical-oxidative scrubbing for the removal of hydrogen sulphide from raw biogas: potentials and economics" Water Science and Technology (2012) to be published Miltner, Makaruk, Krischan, Harasek; 2012 www.iwaponline.com/wst/default.htm