A Review of Oscillating Water Columns
A Review of Oscillating Water Columns
A Review of Oscillating Water Columns
Subject collections
Articles on similar topics can be found in the following collections ocean engineering (17 articles)
Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article - sign up in the box at the top right-hand corner of the article or click here
OPINION
PIECE
235
236
(a) wave crest air flow
T. V. Heath
(b) wave trough air flow
Figure 2. Blowhole at Quobba Western Australia. Reproduced with permission from Crikey Tours. (Online version in colour.)
and Oceanlinx, are also under development. The manufacturers claim that these machines offer a higher conversion efciency than a Wells turbine, but there is no publically available information to demonstrate in real sea conditions and with an appropriate control strategy that the newer designs can match either the performance or the reliability of the turbines in 10 years continuous operation at LIMPET.
237
the concept is adaptable and can be used on a range of collector forms situated on the coastline, in the nearshore region or oating offshore; the use of an air turbine eliminates the need for gearboxes; it is reliable; it is easy to maintain; and it uses sea space efciently. The ability to apply the OWC concept in different locations and on different collector platforms is important in that it allows for a gradual development of the technology. Voith Hydro Wavegens shoreline LIMPET plant on Islay allows for the development of the PTO unit under real conditions in an accessible location. The simultaneous development for deep water application of oating units, moorings, umbilicals and PTO systems can be beyond the resources of technology development companies. By building the LIMPET unit and then focusing on the PTO system, Voith Hydro Wavegen is now able to demonstrate availabilities in excess of 95 per cent and have a PTO suitable for application on OWCs in any location.
3. History
The earliest recorded application of an OWC is the whistling buoy used as a navigation aid. As an audible warning device, it was seen in the nineteenth century as a successor to the traditional bell buoys. J. M. Courtney of New York patented such a whistling buoy (gure 3) and in 1885, it was reported in Scientic American that there were 34 operating along the coast of the USA. It was over half a century before the next signicant development in wave power, and again this occurred in the eld of navigation buoys in 1947 when Masuda, in Japan, designed and installed the rst OWC driving an impulse turbine to produce electricity. The unit was sited in Osaka Bay and the electricity generated powered navigation lights. Security of operation was provided by rechargeable batteries that took their power from the turbine/generator in times of plenty. A commercial range of buoys was developed from this original and are available today from the Ryokuseisha company of Japan. While the output of each unit is small at 70500 W, this application still represents the most common application of a wave energy plant. Figure 4 shows the Uraga light buoy tted with four wave-activated turbine generators. Between 1976 and 1979, a team operating under the auspices of the International Energy Agency tested the OWC units mounted on a oating barge, the Kaimei. The 800 tonne 80 m long barge was moored off the coast of Yura, Tsuruoka City, Yamagata Prefecture. With Japan as the lead national partner, there were contributions from the UK, Canada, Ireland and the USA. Eight OWC chambers were mounted in the barge, each with a nominal 125 kW rating. A range of PTO units were tested, including the self-rectifying Wells and McCormick turbines and more conventional turbine systems using rectication valves. During the 1980s and 1990s, a number of shoreline and shore-connected OWCs were built and tested, including a number in Japan, India, China, Norway, Portugal and Britain. The largest of those built in Japan was the port of Sakata. The ve chambered OWC was built as part of a harbour wall. It is a concrete
Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2012)
238
T. V. Heath
Figure 4. Uraga light buoy Tokyo Bay. Reproduced with permission from Ryokuseisha. (Online version in colour.)
caisson structure that was oated into position before being sunk and lled with ballast. The machine, which became operational in 1989, is tted with a tandem Wells turbine. The original rating of the plant was 60 kW. A single turbine 75 kW unit was built by Queens University Belfast on Islay (gure 5).
Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2012)
239
This grid-connected plant was operated between 1991 and 2000 before being decommissioned and the site returned to nature. The turbine from this plant was recently restored and is now on display at the Deutcshes Museum in Munich. As a follow-on to the Islay prototype, the team at Queens designed the LIMPET plant for construction near to the original plant. Whereas the prototype was in a relatively sheltered gully, the LIMPET plant (originally rated at 500 kW) was facing south westerly towards the teeth of the Atlantic gales. This plant has been in operation since late 2000. The original turbine system has been replaced; the plant is now used as a continuous test bed for the turbine designs to be used in Voith Hydro Wavegens commercial projects with over 60 000 turbine running hours logged to date (gures 68). There is little published information on the performance of air-turbine-based PTO systems for OWC collectors, and it is important to note that success of the system will depend on a good turbine design, an effective control strategy and the matching of the turbine to the OWC collector to ensure efcient collector operation. It is interesting to note that the size of a turbine will often be determined by the requirement for collector matching rather than the ability of the machine to absorb the power from the collector. An example of the energy conversion efciency of the 1.25 m diameter Wavegen turbine shown in gure 8 and measured in irregular seas at LIMPET is shown in gure 9. The pneumatic
Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2012)
240
T. V. Heath
Figure 7. Voith Hydro Wavegen RT1 Turbine at LIMPET (18.5 kW). (Online version in colour.)
Figure 8. Ofcial start of Voith Hydro Wavegen RT2 turbine at LIMPET (110 kW). (Online version in colour.)
power ow was measured as the product of chamber pressure and ow through the turbine, while the electrical power was recorded at the input to the generator frequency converter. Each point on this chart represents a 5 min average of the pneumatic power owing through the turbine and electrical power delivered to the frequency converter. The dataset represents over 400 h of operation. The marginal efciency of conversion in low to moderate seas is 60 per cent. A programme of improvements is in process to further improve this performance. The conversion efciencies shown in gure 9 represent a very signicant improvement on previously published data for Wells turbines, and are the product of cooperative development between Voith Hydro Wavegen and the universities of Stuttgart and Siegen in Germany, together with control systems development at Wavegen. The turbine blades and the associated xed stators are the product of a self-optimizing design analysis developed by the university teams followed by computational uid dynamics and laboratory testing [13]. The efcacy of this work is borne out by the eld measurements. The efciency of the turbine will be inuenced by the regularity of the incident waves. The incident resource at LIMPET is not measured directly, but the ratio of the peak chamber pressure to the r.m.s. over a 15 min spectrum is typically in
Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2012)
241
the range of 56. Waves in the LIMPET gully are signicantly inuenced by the shallow water at the LIMPET site (46 m dependent on tidal height). At the same time as the LIMPET development, a 400 kW OWC was built by Electricidade dos Aores on the island of Pico. This plant is now operated intermittently by the Wave Energy Centre and provides important data for ongoing OWC development. While Voith Hydro Wavegen has focused on proving PTO performance and reliability prior to deployment in ever more challenging locations, other developers in the OWC eld have adopted different development strategies. In conjunction with the University of Craneld, Dresser-Rand has developed a variable radius turbine for use and has tested the unit in an alternating ow. In Ireland, Ocean Energy has developed the backward bent ducted buoy concept originally proposed by Masuda, and the hull has over 20 000 h of live sea trials at the quarter scale. Figures 10 and 11 show the unit at the wave energy test site at Spiddal in Galway in Ireland. There it was subjected to a wide range of wave conditions, including a severe storm when wind speeds reached 2530 m s1 and a wave height of 8.2 m was recorded. For some of the test period, a Wells turbine system developed in Ireland for Ocean Energy was tted to the buoy. During the testing, the airows and power output from the tests scaled up predictably, and the hull behaviour was also consistent and reliable. An alternative design of oating OWC has been developed by Oceanlinx. Their most recent OWC deployment involved its MK3 oating device. The unit (gure 12) is a one-third scale demonstration version of the 2.5 MW full-scale device. It was installed offshore from the eastern breakwater of Port Kembla Harbour from February to May 2010. The unit was grid connected, and supplied electrical power directly into the grid of local retailer, Integral Energy. Returning to the nearshore, Voith Hydro Wavegen is partnering utilities in two pivotal projects; pivotal because they both represent signicant steps in taking wave power systems from single test units towards full-scale commerciality. The rst of these is at Mutriku in the Pas Vasco of northern Spain, where the energy authority Ente Vasco Energia (EVE) is developing an OWC breakwater using Voith Hydro Wavegen PTO technology. The project, which has been delayed for 2 years as a consequence of planning delays and civil engineering
Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2012)
242
T. V. Heath
Ocean Energy
Figure 10. Ocean Energy buoy in storm. Reproduced with permission from Ocean Energy. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 11. Ocean Energy buoy with Wells turbine. Reproduced with permission from Ocean Energy. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 12. Mk3 Oceanlinx wave energy generator. Reproduced with permission from Oceanlinx. (Online version in colour.)
243
Figure 13. Mutriku breakwater including 16 OWC chambers. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 14. Section through Mutriku breakwater. Reproduced with permission from the Basque Government Port Department.
problems was commissioned in spring 2011. It is signicant in that the 16 units forming the OWC breakwater section (gures 13 and 14) represent the rst multiple oscillating water column (MOWC) plant offering the opportunity for studying the interaction of the units and the complexities of multiple control. The research and monitoring activities associated with the plant are supported under the European Union FP6 Nereida project. Voith Hydro Wavegen is also providing the technology for a project at Siadar on the north west coast of Lewis in Scotland. Here, it is planned to build a shoreconnected breakwater comprising 15 OWC cells, each tted with two Wavegen 132 kW turbo-generation units giving a nominal rating of 4 MW. This plant is ground breaking in that it will be the rst breakwater built as a power station rather than as an addition to an already planned breakwater. While there will be considerable community benets in that the scheme will provide a sheltered slipway, these benets are secondary to power generation. It is also the rst
Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2012)
244
T. V. Heath
Figure 15. Photomontage of Siadar breakwater. Reproduced with permission from the Basque Government Port Department. (Online version in colour.)
wave power plant where the plant output will have the potential to have a major inuence on the local grid, and as such, power quality issues become very important. For this reason, power storage and associated power quality control software are included in the scheme.
5. Conclusion
As a concept, the OWC is probably the most studied and the best developed of all systems. In shore-based operation, it has demonstrated the reliability necessary
Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2012)
245
for a viable plant, and there is no reason to believe that this reliability cannot be transferred to other platforms. While not specic to OWC systems, the major limitation to the uptake of wave power generators in commercial operation is the cost of power; this is being addressed. The combination of early stage public support and the commitment from industry to improve competitiveness suggest that OWCs will be part of the future mix of generation.
References
1 Starzmann, R., Carolus, T., Tease, K. & Arlitt, R. 2011 Wells turbine rotors: a comparison of the predicted and measured aerodynamic performance. In Proc. 9th European Turbomachinery Conf., Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 10851095. 2 Starzmann, R., Carolus, T., Tease, K. & Arlitt, R. 2011 Effect of design parameters on aeroacoustic and aerodynamic performance of Wells turbines. In Proc. ASME 2011 30th Int. Conf. on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Rotterdam, Netherlands, OMAE2011-49127. 3 Starzmann, R., Moisel, C., Carolus, T., Tease, K. & Arlitt, R. 2011 Assessment method of sound radiated by cyclically operating Wells turbines. In Proc. 9th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conf., Southampton, UK.