FACTORS AFFECTING CUSTOMER SATISFACTION IN PURCHASE DECISION ON TICKET ONLINE: A CASE STUDY IN AIR ASIA

Submitted by: Budi Kurniawa n 106082102580

INTERNATIONAL PROGRAM MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND SOCIAL SCIENCE STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH JAKARTA 1431 / 2010 M

PERMISION TO USE

In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirement for a Bachelor Degree of Economics from State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, I agree that the university library may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying this thesis in any manner, in whole or part, for scholarly purpose may be granted by my supervisor or, in this absence, by the dean of Faculty of Economics and Social Science. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta for any scholarly use which may be made of any material from my thesis. Request for permission to copy or make other use of material in this thesis, in whole part, should be addressed to :

Dean of Faculty of Economic and Social Science State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta 2010

CURRICULUM VITAE

I. Personal Information Name Place of Birth Date of Birth Address Nationality Marital Status Email II. Formal Education Qualification Course University Duration Time Qualification University Duration Time Qualification Course University Duration Time Qualification Course School Duration Time Qualification Course School Duration Time Qualification School Duration Time : Bachelors Second Degree : International Business Management : Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM) : May 2008 - 2010 : Bachelors First Degree Course : Management / Marketing : State Islamic University Jakarta : Juli 2006 - 2008 : Diploma : Accounting : Politehnik Bina Indonesia Jakarta : 2005 2006 : Second Senior High School : Social Science : SMAN 1 Keruak, Nusa Tenggara Barat : 2003 - 2005 : First Senior High School : Arabic Language : Madrasah Aliyah Keagamaan Negeri Mataram. : 2002 2003 : Junor Islamic Boarding School : MTs NW Tampih, NTB : 1999 2002 : Budi Kurniawan : Tampih, Rensing, Sakra Barat, NTB rd : December, 3 , 1986 : Jln. Puri Intan No.15 Pisangan, Jakarta Selatan : Indonesia : Single : putra_selaparang@ ya hoo.co m

Qualification School Duration Time III.

: Elementary Islamic Boarding School : MI NW Tampih, NTB : 1994 1999

Academic and Prestation BEM UIN (Publication and Documentation Department) 2006 2007. Member of Indonesian Student Community, Malaysia (2008 2009). Saman Dance Organization UUM 2008 2009. Leader of Kecak Dance (Foster Family Program). Terengganu 2008. King of the Night at Cultural Fashion Show UUM 2008. Unity Culture Diversity Participant UUM 2009.

IV.

Training Laboratory Training, Universiti Utara Malaysia (2010). GFOS Bedah Film Indonesia, Universiti Utara Malaysia (2010). Table Manner and Social Ethic, Universiti Utara Malaysia (2010).

V. Skill a. Computer Programmed MYOB Accounting 13+, MYOB Premiere, SPSS all version, Microsoft Office (Word, Excel, Power Point, Visio, Access, Publisher) Image Editing CorelDraw, Photoshop, Photoscape, Web Design. b. Language English Arabic Malaysia. Active Passive Active

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

My greatest gratitude to Allah SWT, the grandest and almighty, most gracious and the most merciful for giving me the chance, and ability to perform this study and for all the change, He has given to me until now. My greatest gratitude to prophet Muhammad SAW for the teachings and love that he has spread to the whole world completing this study. First and foremost, I would like to thanks to my supervisor Prof. Dr. Azzam Jasin, MBA and Suhendra, MM, for their help, time, contribution and effort in providing guidance and constructive suggestion in performing this study, and for the understanding and support he has given. I would like to show my deepest love and thank you to my beloved parent. My Father Muhammad Amin and My Mother Husniati. I am grateful to them for their sacrifice, help, support, prayer, wishes, trust and understanding the y have given to me. I also to thank to my first brother A.H Indro Mediawan, my sister Rulia Khairulamni and my little brother A. H. Azka Ubaidillah, thank you so much for making me keep on realizing that I am not alone in this boat. Thanks you for cheer me up with your love. I am also would like to thank all individual that helped me to consultation and completing my thesis when I was in Malaysia, Kak Dwi Hastuti, Bapak Thamrin, Nuria Damayanti, and also my friend in Indonesia, Dans Arya, Putri Laras Pertiwi, Yasir Mubarok. For their prayer, love and support to me to distribute my questionnaire. All contributed in special ways through their knowledge, experience and attention to detail. I thank to each of them for their unique contribution and also their love to me. To all my friends, classmate, and roommate that willing to help me and support me in this study thanks you for your patience, caring and understanding. My beloved friend Shahidan Mohd for contribution given for me this study, this study could not be performed without your help. With deep appreciation and also love, I acknowledge my best friend Fandi Husain, Cintiya Dewi Hutabarat, Nurul Hidayah, Sisilia Marsheila, Dina Austin, Anweer Abdullalem, Melisa Yong Lisha, Long shin Yun, Rajeshwary, Punita Gunaselan, and all my friend in My facebook and my email that support and give contribution for answered my questionnaire.

Budi Kurniawan Jakarta, 11 June 2010

ABSTRAK

Perkembangan internet dan e-commerce mengubah cara dalam memasarkan serta menjual barang dan jasa. Internet juga mengubah cara perusahaan untuk meberlakukan bisnis dengan para pelanggan yang selalu mengharapkan pelayanan yang baik, hemat waktu dan kemudahan dalam segala hal. Selain itu pelayanan menggunakan elektronik adalah sebuah strategi perusahaan untuk mencapai kesuksesan dalam menjalankan bisnis dan sangat mempengaruhi kelansungan dari perkembangan perusahaan itu sendiri. Objek dan tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah mengukur sejauh mana promosi, kualitas pelayanan, harapan pelanggan dan merek mempunyai pengaruh yang sangat signifikan terhadap kepuasan pelanggan dalam industri penerbangan khususnya pada Air Asia. Kemudian, hasil yang diperoleh menunjukkan bahwa promosi, kualitas pelayanan, pengalaman pelanggan dan merek memiliki pengaruh signifikan terhadap kepuasan pelanggan dalam menentukan pembelian tiket melalui internet. Sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah sebanyak 200 orang dengan metode judgment sampel. Kata Kunci: Promosi, Kualitas Pelayanan, Pengalaman Pelanggan, Merek dagang, Kepuasan Pelanggan, Penentuan dalam Pembelian, Elektronik Tiket.

ii

ABSTRACT

The daily growth of the internet and e commerce has changed the wa y of marketing and selling product and service. Internet is changing the way corporation conduct business with their consumers who are increasingly expecting higher service, becoming time saved, and wanting more convenience. In addition e service quality is an essential strategy to gain success, according to the result of companies. The objective of this study was to examine whether promotion, service quality, customer Experiences and brand have affect forward satisfaction in Airline especially in this study about case in AirAsia. Furth more, the result shown that promotion, service quality, customer Experiences and brand have significant affected customer satisfaction in purchase decision on ticket online. The sample used in this study was 200 respondents with method purposive judgment sampling

Keyword: Promotion, Service Quality, Customer Experiences, Brand, Customer Satisfaction, Purchase Decision, Electronic Ticketing

iii

TABLE OF CONTENT

PERMISION TO USE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ABSTRAK ABSTRACT TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLE LIST OF FIGURE LIST OF FORMULATION

0 i ii iii iv

viii ix x

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION A. Background of the Study B. Problem Statement C. Research Questions D. Research Objectives 1 3 5 5

CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW A. Online Marketing B. Customer Satisfaction. C. Purchase Decision D. E-Ticketing 1. Benefit of E-Ticketing. 2. How Customer Use E-Ticketing E. Factors Effecting Customer satisfaction in Purchasing Ticket Online 6 8 11 13 14 17 17 iv

1. Promotion 2. Relationship between Promotion and Customer Satisfaction. 3. Service Qualit y 4. Relationship between Service Quality And Customer Satisfaction 5. Customer Experiences 6. Relationship Between Experiences and Customer Satisfaction 7. Brand 8. Relationship between Brand and Customer Satisfaction F. Research Framework G. Hypothesis Development.

18 20 21 24 26 26 27 38 29 30

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY A. Research Design B. Unit of Analysis C. Research Sampling D. Instrument and Measurement. E. Data Collection Procedure F. Data Analysis Technique 1. Frequency Analysis 2. Validity and Reliability Test 2.1 Validity Test 2.2 Reliability Test 3. Descriptive Statistics 4. Multiple Linear Regression 4.1 Regression Analysis 4.2 Correlation Analysis 4.3 F Test 4.4 T Test G. Operational Variable 31 32 32 33 34 35 35 36 36 37 38 40 40 41 42 43 43 v

1. Independent Variable 2. Dependent Variable H. Variable Measurement

44 47 49

CHAPTER IV FINDING AND ANALYSIS A. General Description of research object 1. Gender 2. Age Level 3. Education Level 4. Number of Purchase 5. College B. Validity and Reliability 1. Validity Test Result 2. Reliability Test C. Descriptive Analysis 1. Evaluation of Promotion Variable 2. Evaluation of Service Quality Variable 3. Evaluation of Customer Experiences Variable 4. Evaluation of Brand Variable 5. Evaluation of Customer Satisfaction Variable D. Multiple Linear Regression 1. Regression Analysis 1.1 Customer Satisfaction and Promotion 1.2 1.3 1.4 2. Correlation 3. Coefficient Determinant 4. Ftest Customer Satisfaction and Service Quality Customer Satisfaction and Customer Experiences Customer Satisfaction and Brand 51 52 52 53 54 55 56 56 57 58 58 61 64 66 68 70 70 70 72 73 75 77 78 79 vi

5.

ttest

80 82

E. Summary

CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATION A. Conclusion B. Implication of study C. Recommendation D. Limitation REFERENCES APPENDIX I APPENDIX II 83 83 84 84

vii

LIST OF TABLE

Table 3.1 Distribution of Questionnaire Item Table 3.2 Category High and Low reliability Instrument Table 3.3 Linkert Scale Category Table 3.4 Durbin Watson Autocorrelation Measurement Table 3.5 Relationship between Variable, Dimension, Indictor Table 3.6 Questionnaire Development Table 4.1 The Gender of Respondent Table 4.2 The Age of Respondent Table 4.3 Education level Table 4.4 The Number of Purchase in a Year Table 4.5 The College of Respondent Table 4.6 Validity Test Result Table 4.7 Result of Reliability Table 4.8 The Promotion Variable Frequency Table 4.9 The Service Quality Variable Frequency Table 4.10 The Customer Experiences Frequency Table 4.11 Brand Variable Frequency Table 4.12 The Customer Satisfaction Variable Frequency Table 4.13.1 (a) Promotion Model Summary Table 4.13.1 (b) Promotion Coefficients Table 4.13.1 (a) Service Quality Model Summary Table 4.13.1 (b) Service Quality Coefficients Table 4.13.1 (a) Customer Experiences Model Summary Table 4.13.1 (b) Customer Experiences Coefficients Table 4.13.1 (a) Brand Model Summary Table 4.13.1 (b) Brand Coefficients Table 4.14 Correlations Result Table 4.15 Coefficient Determinants (R ) Model Summary
2

34 38 39 41 47 50 52 53 54 54 55 57 58 59 61 64 66 68 71 72 73 73 75 75 76 77 77 79 viii

LIST OF FIGURE

2.1 The Cycle of Customer Satisfaction. 2.2: Online Customer Satisfaction Model 3.1: Flow Chart of Research Approach

18 30 31

ix

LIST OF FORMULATION

Validity Test Formula Reliability Test Formula

36 37

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION

F. Background of the Study. Online marketing is one of the ways to is sometimes considered having a broader scope because it not only refers to the internet, e-mail, and wireless media, but it includes management of digital customer data and electronic customer relationship management systems. Online marketing are interactions between individual recipients and consumers rather than being directed from marketing to masses of consumers. It is possible for an individual to be just as efficient in broadcasting information, both positive and negative, about an organization as it is for a large corporation to promote itself. The online marketing networking that allows the quick and easy dissemination of information and missinformation is in part a product of changes in online communication channels, but these communication channels are in part enabled by such marketing networking. One of the procedures to promote the product and services is by online marketing that using electronic ticketing or e-ticketing. E-ticketing is a way to document the sales process from the customer's travel activities without having to spend valuable documents physically or paper ticket. All information on electronic tickets stored digitally in the airline's computer system. As proof of expenditure e-ticketing, the customer will be given Itinerary Receipt is only valid as an alt to get into the 1

airport in Indonesia, which still requires passengers to take the evidence of the journey. E-ticketing is an opportunity to minimize costs and

optimize passenger comfort. E-ticketing reduces the cost of the e-ticketing form, eliminate paper and increase the flexibility of passengers and travel agents in making changes in the itinerary. In line with the development of technology information, the internet is now emerging as alternative travel information distribution system. The internet is a perfect medium to sell travel packages, because the Internet can bring a broad supplier network and a large base of customers to a centralized market place. The other terms of e-ticketing or online e-ticketing sales, is one way for people to buy tickets for local events. An online booking facilit y which is designed to assist community groups who do not have access to this type of system. E-ticketing system to facilitate people to buy tickets to various events all from a single web site. Tickets can be purchased in this way with cash, check, and credit or debit card. People without access to the Internet can book tickets through the public internet terminal or the library at the center for information and visitor center like direct sale counter.

G. Problem Statement. Online marketing also refers to the placement of media along different engine stages of the customer engagement cycle through search

marketing (SEM), search engine optimization (SEO), banner ads on specific websites, e-mail marketing, and Website strategies. Nowadays many companies in Indonesia use online system

in operation and marketing their product and services, for example in airlines industry, airline industry provide the service with many kind of travel agency which is have linked between island to another island, like Garuda Airlines, AirAsia, Batavia, Merpati, and many other, but most of issues here is in proving service and price lower, case in AirAsia for example, AirAsia airlines famous and create loyalty to the customer while it is can be categorize new in operated when compare to other air transportation, in this report I would like to measure factors affecting customer satisfaction in purchase decision on electronic ticketing issues by AirAsia. Airlines company which is using electronic tickets or e-ticketing, now offered by many major airlines in Indonesia, allow the customer to travel without a paper ticket, eliminating the worry of leaving tickets behind. An eticket confirms airline e-ticketing purchase without requiring a paper record, the only record of an e-ticket sale is in electronic form in the airline's computer system. When customer buys e-tickets through agency, they will receive a confirmation of purchase via e-mail. Customer can buy ticket using two ways those by e-ticketing individual or come to agency ticket it self that issuing by airlines agency. In order to qualify for e-tickets, all segments of trip must be flown on the same airline or on airlines linked by interline e-ticketing agreements. While not all 3

airlines offer this service, e-tickets may not be available for every flight so the customer must order and come to agency center ticket selling. Problem here is about customer satisfaction, customer satisfaction is one of the main purposes of Airline Company like AirAsia airlines, when compared between paper tickets which are sold in agency. In this study, focus on AirAsia, AirAsia is popular one among other airlines in Asia, because one of the ways is using online marketing by implementing e-ticketing system, and makes them different between other airlines in customer satisfaction. Although most of airlines have e-ticketing system also but AirAsia can be said the first record in gaining the customer loyalty.

H. Research Questions. 1. Is there relationship between promotion and customer satisfaction in purchase decision on ticket online? 2. Is there relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction in purchasing decision on ticket online? 3. Is there relationship between customer experiences and customer satisfaction in purchasing decision on ticket online? 4. Is there relationship between brand and customer satisfaction in purchase decision on ticket online?

I. Research Objectives. This study is conducted four objectives. Especially the present study attempt: 1. To examine the relationship between promotion and customer satisfaction. 2. To examine the relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction. 3. To examine the relationship between customer experiences and customer satisfaction. 4. To examine the relationship between brand and customer satisfaction.

CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW

A. Online Marketing. Technological advances has profoundly changed the way consumers buy products and services. Around the globe, the number of Internet users is approximately 655 million in 2002 and is expected to reach 941 million by the end of 2005 (Dholakia and Uusitalo, 2002). Many companies have started using the internet with the aim of cutting marketing costs, thereby reducing the price of their products and services in order to stay ahead in highly competitive markets. Customers use the Internet not only limited to buy products and services online, but also to compare prices, product features and after sale service facilities they will receive if they purchase the product or services from a particular store. The rapid growth of internet users globally provides a bright prospect for e-marketers. According to a study from International Data Corp (IDC), more than 600 million people accessed the internet globally by the end of 2002 and spent more than US$1 trillion buying goods and services online (Straits Times, 2002). People are now buying many types of goods and services on the internet. With the growing numbers and changing trends of buying behavior, an increasing number of companies are also finding it attractive to join the bandwagon and offer the consumers online shopping facilities. A number of studies have tried to examine the profiles and 6

characteristics of online buyers. It is important for marketers to develop a better understanding of the internet shoppers, as this will help them in developing the effective marketing strategies and tactics in an effort to attract and retain existing customers. Since the year 2000, many industries have been turning to the Internet to market their product, including the airline industry. The widespread of enthusiasm for e-commerce has lead airline industry to venture into electronic ticketing or e-ticketing. The concept of e-ticketing has entered U.S as far back as in 1980s which is primarily adopted by its domestic carriers, United Airlines in 1984 (www. travelandtourism.com, 2005). In the Asia Pacific region, particularly in the Philippines, Thailand, Hong Kong and Malaysia the e-ticketing service is gaining popularity (SITA, 2005). On the Malaysian front, the concept was first initiated by AirAsia the countrys low cost carrier. This paper begins by reviewing the relevant literature pertaining to the area to provide the theoretical background of the study. Thereafter, the methodology is discussed, followed by a description of the findings. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implication of the findings and identifies areas for future research.

B. Customer Satisfaction. Customer satisfaction is one of the most important issue concerning business organization of all types, which is justify b y the customer oriented philosophy and the principles of continues improvement in modern enterprise. For the reason, customer satisfaction should be measured and translated into number of measurable parameter. Customer satisfaction measurement may be considered as the most reliable feedback, providing client preferences and experiences in an effective, direct, meaningful and objective way. Thus, customer base line standard satisfaction and may be considered a possible as a of

of performance

standard

excellence for any business organization (Gerson, 1993). Customer satisfaction is a complex construct. It has been defined in various ways (Besterfield, 1994; Barsky, 1995; Kanji and Moura, 2002; Fecikova, 2004). Recently, researchers have argued that there is a distinction between customer satisfaction as related to tangible products and as related to service experiences. This distinction is due to the inherent intangibility and perishes ability of services, as well as the inability to separate production and consumption. Hence, customer satisfaction with services and with goods may derive from, and may be influenced by, different factors and therefore should be treated as separate and distinct (Veloutsou et al., 2005). There are two principal interpretation of satisfaction within the literature of satisfaction as a process a satisfaction as an outcome (Parker and Mathews, 2001). Early concepts of satisfaction research have typically defined 8

satisfaction as a post choice evaluation judgment concerning a specific purchase decision (Oliver, 1980; Churchill and Suprenant, 1992; Bearden and Teel, 1983; Oliver and DeSarbo, 1988). The most widely accepted model, in which satisfaction is a function of disconfirmation, which is a function of both expectations and performance (Oliver, 1997). The disconfirmation

paradigm in process theory provide the grounding for the vast majority of satisfaction studies construct and encompasses performance, four

expectation,

disconfirmation and satisfaction (Caruana et al., 2000). This model suggests that the effects of expectation are primarily through disconfirmation, but they also have effect of perceive performance on satisfaction (Spreng and Page, 2001). Swan and Comb (1988) view satisfaction as a discrepancy between the observed and desired. This is consisting with value-percept disparity theory (Westbrook and Reilly, 1983) which was developed in response to the problem that consumers could be satisfied by aspects for which expectation never existed (YI, 1990). The value-percept theory view satisfaction as an emotional response triggered by a cognitive- evaluation process (Parker and Mathews, 2001). In order words, it is the comparison of the object to ones value rather than an expectation. Customers want a meeting between their values (need and want) and the object of their evaluation (Parker and Mathews, 2001). More recently, renewed attention has been focused on the nature Mathew, 2001). Consequently, recent literature adds to this perspective in two ways. 9 of satisfaction emotion, fulfillment and state (Parker and

First,

although

traditional

model

implicitly

assume

that

customer

satisfaction

1 0

is

essentially

the

result that

of

cognitive

process, may

new also

conceptual contribute

developments suggest substantially to

effective

process

the explanation and prediction of customer satisfaction

(Fornell and Warnerfelt, 1987; Westbrook, 1987; Wesbrook and Oliver, 1991). Second, satisfaction should be viewed as a judgment base on the cumulative expectations made with a certain product or service rather than a transactionspecific phenomenon (Wilton and Nicosia, 1986). There is general agreement that satisfaction is a persons feelings of pleasure or disappointments resulting from comparing a products perceive performance (or outcome) in relation to his or her expectation (Kotler, 2003, P.36). Based on this review, customer satisfaction is defined as a result of a cognitive and affective performance. If the perceive performance is less than expected, customer will be satisfied. On the other hand, if the perceived performance exceeds expectations, customers will satisfy. Otherwise, if the perceive expectations are met with performance, customer are in a different or neutral stage. Customer satisfaction is defined as a customers overall evaluation of the performance of an offering to date. This overall satisfaction has strong positive effect on customer loyalty intentions across a wide range of product and service categories (Gustafsson, 2005). Customer satisfaction is a collective outcome of perception, evaluation, and psychological reaction to the consumption expectation with a product or services (Yi, 1990). According to Kottler (2000, p.36) satisfaction is a felling of pleasure or disappointment resulting from 10

comparing a product

11

perceived performance or outcome in relation to his or her expectations early concept of satisfaction research has typically defined satisfaction as a post choice evaluation judgment concerning a specific purchase decision (Churchill and Sauprenant, 1992; Oliver 1980). Yang and Fang (2004) believe that online customer still demand many service available through traditional channels even if they choose pure internet-based supplier with basic customer service. Although expectations seem to be of lesser importance as a comparison standard in e-commerce (Zeithaml et al., 2000), customer appear to use expectations-base norm (Codotte et al., 1987) and traditional service as comparison standard for e-service (Van Riel et al., 2001). Operationally, satisfaction is similar to an attitude, as it can be assessed as the sum of the satisfactions with the various attributes of the product or service (Churchill and Surprenant, 1982). However, while attitude is a pre-decision construct, satisfaction is a post decision expectation construct (LaTour and Peat, 1979).

C. Purchase Decision. In the past, investigations on consumer decision-making issues were mainly focused on the decision-making process. However, Bettman (1979) argues that consumers may sometimes typically rely on simple

strategies, rather than going through a series of steps or processes rationally when they made purchase decisions, they may simply.

12

Emphasize or analyze some typical dimensions or characteristics that are obvious and being conscious of (Sproles, 1985). In this regard, Sproles and Kendall (1986) pioneered to investigate consumer decision-making

processes by profiling consumers into different decision-making styles. Such styles have recently been found to be highly correlated with some product characteristics (i.e. price, country of origin and brand) in Wickliffes

(1998) study. Since apparels product attributes or critical characteristics can always determine its ultimate purchase acceptance or rejection by consumers (Sproles, 1979). Consumer decision-making styles are patterned, mental and cognitive orientations that consistently dominate a consumers approach in making purchase choices (Sproles, 1985, Sproles and Kendall, 1986). To

conceptualize these styles, a model which composed of eight mental orientations (perfectionism consciousness, brand consciousness, novelt y and fashion consciousness, consciousness, recreational price and and value hedonistic consciousness,

shopping

impulsive and careless consumer, confused by over choice consumer and habitual and brand loyal consumer) of consumer decision-making behavior was established by Sproles and Kendall (1986). Consumers usually form price expectations to assist their purchase decision for a product. These price expectations are then used as reference points to compare with store prices and make purchase decisions

(Monroe 1973). 13

D. E-Ticketing. An e-ticketing (electronic ticketing) is a paperless electronic document used for ticketing passenger, particularly in the commercial airlines industry. Virtually all major airlines now use this method of ticketing. When a customer books a flight by telephone or using the web, the detail of reservation are stored in computer. The customer can request that a hardcopy confirmation be sent by postal mail, but it is not needed at the check in desk. A confirmation number is assigned to the passenger along with the flight number(s), date(s), departure location(s), and destination location(s). When checking passenger simply in at presents the airport, the Then necessary

positive identification.

boarding passes are issued, and the passenger can check luggage and proceed through security to the gate area. The principal advantage of e-ticketing is the fact that it reduces booking expense by eliminating the need printing and mailing paper documents. Another advantage is that it eliminating the possibility of critical document getting lost in the mail or being sent to the wrong address. There could be many ways to describe an e ticketing system due to its differences in user interface, architecture system and characteristics of the airlines organization nit represents. Basically an e ticketing system is a computer-based information system that is used to purchase airline tickets. It is a method and apparatus for purchasing an airlines ticket which includes entering information into a computer information system and performing a search on an airlines reservation system database for flight 14

corresponding to

15

the desired flight information. The method determines whether a flight found during the search has a fare that is acceptable for the consumer, and if so books the flight to hold it for the consumer for a predetermine period of time to allow the consumer to effect payment. In United States, the airline reservation system started since 1940s and change through the years, at first, the primary change was to reduce clerical cost but then come a realization that an accurate count of number and names of passenger for each flight was fundamental to control airlines operation. Information gathered through the reservation

process was used to manage passenger service level and aircraft capacity, Copeland and McKeny (1988). Starting from an electromechanical base, the airlines reservation system evolved with the computer technology,

internet and air transportation industries thus becoming what we see today for example the AirAsias online e-ticketing system. They are adapting the e ticketing system technology and have been very successful in doing it. Here we would like to measure benefit use online marketing using eticketing and how customer use online marketing using e-ticketing.

1. Benefit of E-Ticketing. Each organization is planning an event and is responsible for selling tickets for the event can enhance the activity on the website. All the promoters who sign up will be approved by administrators before they can start selling tickets so that only those who can demonstrate that they are the 16

main event will be allowed to promote the event. This system allows the customers to promote a free event and sell tickets for the event to a wider audience. This also means customers do not have to pay a fee to set up this system or the administration. E-ticketing offers many benefits

(Nicholas, 2008), they are: a. Cost savings means reduce costs associated with printing and mailing tickets to ticket buyers. Eliminate tickets for the stock, envelopes and mail. b. Labor savings means reduce labor associated with printing and mailing tickets. Cut down on the effort required to take the e-ticketing to buy will call orders. c. Safe and secure means e-ticket safe and secure. Barcode validation eliminates the possibilit y of counterfeit and duplicate e-ticketing. d. Actual attendance reporting means find out how much customers eticket patrons attended customers event and when they arrived. e. Instant delivery means ticket buyers happy to be able to print their tickets immediately. No need to wait for a letter or waiting in line at the event. Customers can print their electronic tickets as soon as the y buy it. This makes e-tickets are ideal for last minute gift or a last minute decision. f. Additional information means e-tickets to provide space for or reduce the need

additional information such as street maps, directions, and other customer information customer may need to know. 17

g.

Advertising means e-ticket provides unique advertising capabilities. Increase companys revenue by offering ad space on web ticket. While maintaining high safety standards is the main priority to ensure flight safety, a number of full-service airlines have adopted e-ticketing as part of an effort to improve service to customers. e-ticketing

system that allows passengers a book a plane e-ticketing to get copies of records they receive inventors or reservation number and e-ticket number. e-ticket that is beneficial for both airlines and travelers. Eliminate this problem and the cost of travelers expectation when the y lose a paper ticket. If a boarding pass is lost, replacement is often easy to get as up to the e-ticketing counter and give confirmation number for the new one. As for airlines, e-tickets are cheaper and more efficient method of ticket management. He eliminates the manual tasks required to process and account for paper airline e-ticketing and save the cost of other materials, such as the e-ticketing jacket. A passenger who holds the e-tickets have the option to check in online and print out his boarding pass at home or at work. This service is available between 30 hours and one hour before scheduled departure passengers. With benefits for both airlines and passengers, it's no wonder that more and more airlines are preparing an electronic ticketing system - something that has received enthusiastic response from passengers around the world.

(http://www.indonesia logu e.com).

18

2. How Customer Use E-Ticketing. Anyone can buy tickets online system. Customer must register on payment system to use the facilit y. This is a very simple process and helps customer save the data customer have purchased tickets. Promoters have a safe area on the e-ticketing site where they can monitor sales and print off a list of people who ordered them to attend the event.

Customers need to register before start selling tickets. The registration process to request information about the personal contact detail and details and communit y groups who have to pay the e-ticketing revenue. The registration process also requires costumer to accept the terms and conditions for the sale of tickets on-line, This booking is usually and must be in one particular website developed by company it self, or any cooperation between website, for example AirAsia have a specific website that can be use when customer book e-ticketing by access

www.AirAsia.com. (Nicholas, 2008).

E. Factors Effecting Customer satisfaction in Purchasing Ticket Online. Customer satisfaction is dynamic process, which can change over time as variables in the market are impacted by many factor, the customer satisfaction seems realistic in the current dynamic market structure that defines the online ticketing and may expose of some of the critical factors of satisfaction as a process (Sharon, 2003). Customer service interaction starts with what customer thinks and what will happen or what is he expect. Overtime, as the customer uses the service, this dimension changes 19

tittles and

20

becomes past experience. How the customer has been treated in the past will affect what the customer expects to happen on a particular encounter. One of the factors that have repeatedly indicated the customers choice in the product selected online is branding. Understand the impact of branding on purchase can provide key insights into what satisfied the customer (Gorst, Kanfi & Wallance, 1998).

Figure: 2.1 The Cycle of Customer Satisfaction.

1. Promotion. Promotion is a form of cooperate communication that uses various methods to reach a targeted audience with certain message in order to achieve specific organization object (www.wikipedia.com/promo tion). According to Onwuchuruba (2002:115) will depend on services and products price offers, distributions system and promotional programmed. Here, services of the telecommunication organizations that 21

satisfy

22

consumers require crucial decision as; the features and introduction of new services products, service product life cycle, modification or deletion of existing and unprofitable services products and the elongation of the life span of a services product. On promotional strategy, current and potential consumers need be encouraged to obtain, utilize and benefit maximally from telecom services provisions. In so doing, the telecom services provision can immensely achieve its corporate objectives. In a specific term, level of consumer satisfaction in telecomm provisions could be improved in formulating and choosing decisions as;

appropriate promotional

objectives and tools (e.g. advertising, personal selling, publicity, sales promotions etc), designing of promotional campaign, launching new telecom products that could project the image of he telecommunication organizations as main, coordinating and controlling all services and products through promotional activities to ensure maximum results of consumer satisfaction. The advertisement are in the form of slam rectangular graphic image that is linked to a target advertisement which generally appears at the top or the bottom of website and contain a short text or graphical message that can be customized for target audiences. According to Kierzkowski, McQade, Waltman, & Zeisser, (1996), this can be achieved by billboard advertisement, links from other sited and leveraging on existing marketing communication, term piggy back advertising.

Companies need to develop website with customer service in mind 23

(Karakaya 2001).

24

2. Relationship between Promotion and Customer Satisfaction. A great way to build customer satisfaction through marketing is to promotion, company need to give away a few things. Product or service promotions are a great way to build relationships with customers because everyone is out to find a good deal. Use the holidays to run some product promotions as most people have the day off and they will spend time in your store if company offer them something valuable.

(http://www.businesskno wledgesou rce.com). Many researchers have hinted at a feelings-based route through which promotions may impact consumers satisfaction. Scott (1976) was the first to suggest that the effectiveness of a deal might be explainable b y the affect generated by that promotional offer. Regret (Inman

and McAlister, 1994) and hedonic enjoyment of a deal (Chandon et al., 2000) have also appeared in promotion research. Promotions are shown to reduce feelings of guilt associated with consumption of certain products that can result to customer satisfaction (Strahilevitz and Myers, 1998), and the outcome of promotional purchases is predicted to result in specific pride- related responses such feeling like a smart shopper(Schindler, 1989). Despite indications of affect- based reactions to promotions, there has not been a system- attic delineation of the dimensions of affect as they pertain to promotional response. The important factor which drives customer satisfaction is the ability of the promotion with website to provide ability of the user to 20

control the medium. To satisfy all level of competence among consumer and their different requirements, tasted and preferences a site must offer a vast array of features and function which will inevitably make it slower to load and more complicated to use (Reicheld & Schefter, 2000). Information such as discounted product and compiling special offers from several different companies selling the same product and displaying them to the public could increase customer satisfaction (Khanh & Kandampully, 2002). Potential customers have an opportunity to make a detailed comparison of the offering on the websites promotion before making an informed choice (Ahsanul Haque & Ali Khatibi, 2007). Consistency is an important condition because when people use the internet for the first times they from an opinion and remember each stage of the transaction (Ahsanul Haque & Ali Khatibi, 2007).

3. Service Quality. Quality is an elusive and indistinct construct. Often mistaken for imprecise adjective like goodness, or luxury, or shininess, or weight (Crosby 1979), quality and its requirements are not easily articulated by consumers (Takeuchi and Quelch 1983). According to Gronroos. Service quality is the result of an evaluation process in which customer compares

21

their perceptions of service delivery and its outcome against what the y expect. Many researchers have recognized the need to develop

measures of service quality. One of the most often used measures is the SERVQUAL based on extensive research in generic determinants of perceived service quality (Parasuraman, Berry et al. 1985; Parasuraman, Berry et al. 1988; Zeithaml, Parasuraman et al. 1990; Parasuraman, Berry et al. 1991; Parasuraman, Berry et al. 1993; Parasuraman, Berry et al. 1994). The SERVQUAL instrument is accepted as standard for assessing various dimensions inservice quality (Buttle, 1994). It is a concise multiple-item scale with good reliability and validity that researcher can use to better understand the service expectations and perceptions of consumers and, as a result, improve service (Parasuraman et al., 1988). SERVQUAL was also chosen because it is valuable when it is used periodically to track the service quality trends, and when it is used in conjunction with other forms of service quality measurement (Parasuraman et al., 1985). There are five service quality dimension identified by Parasuraman et al. (1988). All these five dimensions are: a. Tangible refers to appearance of physical facilities, equipment, personnel, and communication materials. Include all physical

products that are involved in service delivery, and even other customers.

22

b. Reliability refers to ability to perform the promised service dependably and accurately. service is performed thoroughness every time. c. Responsiveness refers to willingness to help customers, provide prompt service and how fast the service is provided. d. Assurance refers to knowledge and courtesy of employees and their ability to convey trust and confidence. e. Empathy refers to the firm provides care and individualized attention to its customers. While being widely applied, the SERVQUAL model has also received criticism for not including prices in the assessment or for the inclusion of expectations as a variable in measuring service qualit y (Boulding, Kalra et al. 1993). Perhaps the most often heard criticism pertains to the lack of a clear link between satisfaction and perceived service quality identified by some research (Duffy and Ketchard 1998). An alternative model (SERVPERF) was later developed for these reasons, based on the findings that service quality does not depend on expectations and can be directly measured by simple performance based measures of service quality (Cronin and Taylor 1994). with high accuracy and

23

4. Relationship between Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction. When a customer recognizes quality, it is reflected in customer satisfaction. In the web environment, the web (user interface) can be regarded as a service and user as customer. They brows, or surf the internet, access, retrieve and share information interact with other over the internet, order product or trade stock and obtain entertainment. The

quality of this service plays a greater role than the quality of service to customer in other sector, such as hospital or hotels, or the customer service of a bookstore. Firstly, experience the customers of traditional service usually to the

service quality after they have committed

organizations. In the case of the web, users experience the service quality first, then decide whether to commit. Secondly, since there is no face to face human interaction in the web environment, and service adjustments based on verbal and non verbal cues are not evidence. Thus the design of the website is crucial importance in delivering service (Neilsen, 2000). Ishikwa (1990) recognize the importance of customer

satisfaction and dividend quality into two categories of backward looking and forward looking. The former refers to non conformance, defects, flaws, deficiency, and rework of which absence is absolutely requested, and their existence result on customer dissatisfaction. On the other hand, selling point and characteristics of product such as ease of use and excellence design that makes it superior to the other company offerings. According to Ishikwa, 24

fulfillment of this quality element provides positive customer satisfaction, although the quality is also acceptable. Delivering quality to customer in a competitive marketplace like airline industry dictates the need to continually enhance a customers experience and satisfaction. According to Schneider and Bowen (1999), In general terms, most customers range from being moderately dissatisfied to moderately satisfied. Satisfaction can be considered at two levels: the transaction or encounter level and overall satisfaction (Bitner and Hubbert, 1994). Initially, Cronin and Taylor (1992) hypothesized that satisfaction is an antecedent of service quality. However, their research with a multi- industry sample showed, in a LISREL analysis, an opposite

relationship. Quality appears to be only one of the service factors contributing to the customer's satisfaction judgments (Cronin and Taylor, 1992). Spreng and Mackoy (1996), who test a modified version of a model proposed by Oliver (1993) that sought to integrate the satisfaction and service quality literature, also provide support for service quality as being an antecedent to satisfaction. More recently, this relationship has also been confirmed from a study in a health-care setting by Deruyter et al. (1997), who also show that service quality should be treated as an antecedent of service satisfaction. Iacobucci et al. (1995) conclude that the key difference between service quality and customer satisfaction is that quality relates to managerial delivery of the service while

satisfaction reflects customers expectation 25

with that service. They argue that quality improvements that are not based on customer needs will not lead to improved customer satisfaction.

5. Customer Experiences. Customer experiences is the sum of all experiences of customer has with marketer of good and service, over the duration of the relationship with their marketer. It can also be used to mean an individual experience over one transaction, the distinction is user usually clear in context (www.en.wikipedia.org). Providing a unique customer

experiences is the key to wining the hearts and minds of consumers in the new millennium. Their work indicated that consumers value the experiences of good or services more than its actual tangible. In fact the experiences become a key element of the overall product being purchased and consumed (Pine & Gilmore, 1990).

6. Relationship between Customers Experiences and Customers Satisfaction. The consumers satisfaction or dissatisfaction is consequences of consumption or service experiences (Janiszewski, 2009). The process of consumer behavior describe the basic step that an ultimate consumer goes through in satisfying what customer want in the market which is problem

26

recognition to information search and choice and post decision evaluation. (Pine & Gilmore, 1990). Customer satisfaction based on experiences in the interpretation of the exchange relationship in the marketplace. The ongoing buyer seller relationships take many different forms. The buyers perception of the effectiveness of the exchange relationship is a significant mobility barrier and potential competitive advantage for the seller that insulates from price competition.

7. Brand. Brand satisfaction can be defined as (Engel, Blackwell, & Minard, 1990) the outcome of the subjective evaluation that the

chosen alternative (the brand) meets or exceeds the expectation. This definition is in line with the may definition of satisfaction based on the disconfirmation paradigm (Oliver, 1980) found in the literature. The notion that stands out in almost every definition of satisfaction is the notion of a comparison between experiences and (brand) performance. Branding today is the formal introduction of the company, what is stand for, and the product it provides the customer. A brand is a promise or a set of guidelines in the mind of the customer about what the company will do it, it defines the company and gives the specific value to ring the company to the market (Stephens, 2001).

27

The American marketing association defines a brand as a name, term, symbol, design, or combination of them, intended of them, intended to identify good and services of one seller, or group of sellers, and to differentiate them from those of competition (Rayport & Joworski, 2001).

8. Relationship between Brand and Customer Satisfaction. Brand affects how a company is remembered, and how customer describes the company to other. Brand building takes consistency, and commitment, to ensure that the brand communicate the desired message to the consumer. Brand are also an effective marketing strategy

since companies with a positive brand presence can use the leverage developed from the bricks and mortar structure in using all the benefit of branding (Sharon, 2003). Grasse (1999) states that it has been recognized that rand are often the most valuable corporate assets, exceeding less dominate product both in term of consumer awareness and of financial valuation. There are theories that awareness recognize brand as being anchored in consumer

as intangible assets of companies or as a theoretical construct,

which is functionally depend on brand management. Consumer use brand to identify the source of market of a product and to assign responsibility to the particular manufacturer or distributor for delivery of the product in the manner describe (Keller, 1998). The brand is 28

a set of differentiating promises that links a product to its consumers. The brand assures the customer of a consistent quality and superior value for which the customer is willing to commit to the product, giving reliability, and also willing to pay that result in a reasonable return on the brand. Branding is a promises to the consumer that product will be deliver to them with all of the features described, and commutated. Branding is a relationship that is built on understanding and satisfaction (Higgins, 1999). The evolution of branding in the bricks and mortal structure has created a value structure that becomes even more important in the online sales. The value of branding emerged in the tangible consumer product market, in an environment where the customer was able to capture, and experience the product through sensory perception. The online space provide a challenge for marketer to adapt the notion of branding in a new environment where product are distributed and advertised, but consumers do not experience the same concept of branding. Branding can provide opportunities for differentiation and customer satisfaction (Sharon, 2003).

F. Research Framework. The figure 2.2 shows the online customer satisfaction research model in this project. There is significant among advertisement, product quality, customer experiences and brand with customer satisfaction. Familiarity to above variables is a very important factor to increase customer satisfaction

29

Independent Variables

Dependent Variables

Promotion

Service Quality Customer Satisfaction

Brand Figure 2.2: Online Customer Satisfaction Model

G. Hypothesis Development. Four hypotheses has been developed for this study based on dependent and independent variables are given below H1: Promotion positively related to the customer satisfaction on purchase decision when they booking online. H2 : Service quality positively related to customer satisfaction in purchase decision on ticket online H3 : Customer experiences and customer satisfaction are positively related. H4 : Brand plays an important role to the customer satisfaction in purchase decision.

30

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

A. Research Design. This was a correlation study (Sekaran, 2006) which attempted to investigate the statistical relationship between the online customer satisfaction with few independent variables such as advertisement, service quality, customer experiences and brand. This was field a study whereby all variable were not manipulated or controlled, thus no artificial was created. The sample, unit analysis, sampling method and time horizon were discussed. The data are analyzing using SPSS Statistical Analysis Software 17.

Bibliographic review

Prepare and distributing questionnaires The analysis of the questionnaires

Data analysis

Figure 3: Flow Chart of Research Approach

B. Unit of Analysis. The unit of analysis refers to the level of aggregation of the data collected during the subsequent data analysis stage. The research is focusing on customer satisfaction in purchasing decision especially in booking ticket online. The unit of analysis for this study is individuals of Indonesian students who are using AirAsia Airlines. These individuals include students from 5 Universities in Malaysia. They are Universiti Utara Malaysia, International Islamic University Malaysia, Universiti Technology Malaysia, Universiti Saint Malaysia and University than of Malaysia degree The population student of In

sample comprised

more

1500

Indonesian

Malaysia. The sample appropriate recommended by Sakaran (2003) is 200 respondents. These students were chosen is this study because they are the most probable ones using AirAsia. This would provide a more reliable answer to our research questionnaire about purchasing decision of e-ticketing.

C. Research Sampling. The respondents are selected through purposive sampling. Purposive sampling used is judgment. According to Sakaran (2006), Judgment involve the choice of subjects who are in the best position to provide the information required by respondents typically are chosen using non probability methods, first researcher selected 5 Universities in Malaysia as population which is have mentioned, The target respondent is the student who ever

travel with AirAsia Airplane and the responded should be Indonesian student in Malaysia.

D. Instrument and Measurement. Dornyei (quoting Brown, 2001) defines a questionnaire as any written instruments that present respondents with a series of questions or statements to which they react either by writing out their answers or selecting from among existing answers. The question consists of two sections of questions. There are section A, and section B, in the questionnaires. Section A, measurement used is nominal scale which is split data into mutual exclusive and collectively exhausted categories (Sekaran, 2006). It is designed to gather respondent demographic details such as gender, age, level education, number of purchasing and college, while section B

measurement used is ordinal scale, the respondents selection which measure four major items. The purpose of the questionnaires is to obtain the major information which is described in part B such as promotion, product quality, customer experiences, and brand. Scale that will be used is categorical scale in section B, which the respondents is asked to tick one answer from question 1 to question 21 at the space provided. The respondents were asked to indicate their degree of agreement or disagreement on several features, A five point lanker type scale will be used with 1 = strongly satisfied to 5 = strongly dissatisfied. The table 3.3 below has shown the breakdown of the questionnaire.

Table 3.1 Distribution of Questionnaire Item

PART A B

Variable Respondents personal details Promotion Service quality Customer Experiences Brand Total number of questions

Number of Question 5 1-6 7-12 13-18 19-21 21

E. Data Collection Procedure. The method of data collection for this study is quantitative. Questionnaire will be used as primary data collection method refers to information that is developed or gathered for the research project at hand (Burns and Bush, 2006:146). Questionnaire was distributed using the email, and facebook. The advantage of using mail questionnaire survey is that the y are efficient and relative inexpensive (Chadwick, Chan & Price, 1984). Another advantage is easy to administer, can reach out globally, fast delivery and respondent can answer at their convenience, as with the mail question, (Sekaran, 2006). Explanations will be given to students on how to complete the questionnaires. The questionnaire will be distributed to respondents which

the name of the respondents given from the initial respondents which is Indonesia student in Malaysia. The distribution gives two to three week for the respondent to answer the question. Data collection was carried out from May, 20 , 2010 by e-mail, facebook and collection process was collected on July, 8 , 2010 through e- mail, and facebook.
st th

F. Data Analysis Technique. Descriptive Statistic is the statistical technique that being used in the analysis of this research. Frequency and percentage is the type of analysis that being used in this research. The data obtained from questionnaires are all facts. Statistical package the social sciences (SPSS) version 17.0 was used to analyze the data collection in this study. For data processing, four statistical techniques were used for different purposes. These included frequency, descriptive statistics, validity and reliability test, correlation analysis and regression analysis

1. Frequency Analysis. The frequency analysis has purpose to measure the pattern of respondents background. In section A (gender, age, education level, marital status, and college) will analyze using frequencies and percentages.

2. Validity and Reliability Test. In compiling the instrument to obtain the good instrument, there are several condition must be filled. The good instrument must meet two important conditions, they are valid and reliable

3.1 Validity Test. Validity represents how far the measurement can measure what that want to measure, are we measure the right thing or not. Thus questionnaire that used as the tool to collect the data of study will test about validity. The validity test used in this study is the item validity test that is validity testing on items quality. The higher the validity of a valid tool, the higher the gauge concerning his target. The formulation coefficient that used in this study is product moment (Sutrisno Hadi, 1991) as follows:

rXY = =

_n( XY) (X Y)_= 2 2 2 2 [nX (X) ] [nY (Y) ]

Where n = Total of respondent x = Answer score on the question (item) y = Score total of question (item)

To know the level of item validity, hence rvalue in correlation table compared with rtest from total score testing by formulating of product moment Pearson, if rtest rvalue hence the item in the question to collect the data have construct validity, the other hand the item in the questionnaire are valid and can use to data collection.

3.2 Reliability Test. The reliability test is conducted to ensure the consistency or stability of the items (Sekaran, 2000). The measurement of reliability showed through Cronbachs Alpha (). The Cronbachs Alpha test was used to analyze the reliability of the instruments. According to Maholtra (2007), the reliability acceptance level should be more than 0.60.

r11 = _k_ (k-1) Where: r k b t

b 2 t

= Reliability = Number of question = Item variance = Total variance

Table 3.2 Category High and Low Reliability Instrument

Alpha 0,00 0,20 > 0,20 0.40 > 0,40 0,60 > 0,60 0,80 > 0,80 1,00

Reliability Category Very Low Low Sufficient High Very High

Source: Sugiono (2005)

3. Descriptive Statistics. Descriptive statistics for all variables were obtained. The purpose of descriptive analysis was to represent raw data transformed into a form that will make then easy to understand and interpret. Respondents in section B analyze using descriptive statistics to find how the independent variables react to customer satisfaction. The items in the instrument that were measure base on 5 point Linkert scale that using 1 -5, where 1 represent strongly disagree and 5 represent strongly agree

1.8

2.6

3.4

4.2

Where: Score 1 1.8 Score 1.8 2.6 Score 2.6 3.4 Score 3.4 4.2 Score 4.2 5 : Strongly dissatisfied : Dissatisfied : Neutral : Satisfied : Strongly satisfied

The average total score of independent variable which are promotion, service quality, customer experiences, and also brand will be calculated one by one in Chapter IV.

Table 3.3 Linkert Scale Category

Strongly Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Strongly Dissatisfied Satisfied SD D N S SS 1 2 3 4 5 Source: Sugiono: metode penelitian bisnis, 2005, P.87.

4. Multiple Linear Regressions. 4.1 Regression Analysis. Regression analysis will be used to test hypotheses formulated for this study. Five variables (promotion, service quality, customer experiences, brand, and customer satisfaction) were entered. Multiple regressions will determine the significant dependent and independent variables, relationship between the direction of the

relationship, the degree of the relationship and strength of the relationship (Sekaran, 2006). Multiple regression are most sophisticated extension of correlation and are used to explore the predict ability of a set of independent variables on dependent variable (Pallant, 2001). The data was edited to detect errors and certify that data quality standard is achieved. Proportions were the summary measured used to describe the dependent and independent variable. Four hypotheses generated. From the hypothesis it

gives direction to assess the statistical relationship between the dependent and independent variables. The convention of P value has been set as of 5% i.e. 0.05 used as evidence of a statistical

association between the dependent and independent variables. Data analysis also involved the construction of a model that captured some of the major element that impact consumer booking ticket and customer satisfaction online. The researches question was 40

addressed and all the variables that impact customer satisfaction online were considered. In this study also measure the Autocorrelation test. It is the certain model is aimed to know the availability of

correlation between disturbance variables (e1) in the previous period (et1).

Table 3.4 Durbin Watson Autocorrelation Measurement

Durbin Watson Less than 1.10 1,10 and 1.54 1.55 and 2.46 2.46 and 2.90 More than 2.90

Conclusion Autocorrelation Available Without conclusion No Autocorrelation available Without conclusion Autocorrelation available

Source: Muhammad Firdaus (2004; 101)

4.2 Correlation Analysis. To investigate whether all factor independent and dependent variable were independent or inter correlated, a person predict moment correlation analysis conducted. Correlation test used for inferential statistics. The Pearson correlation will be used to measure the significance of linear bivatriate between the independent variables and dependent variables thereb 41

42

achieving the objective of this study (Sakaran, 2006). Variables association refers to a wide variety of coefficient which measure strength relationship. Correlation is a bivatriate measure of association (strength of the relationship) of the relationship between two variables. It varies from 0 (random relationship) to 1 (perfect linear relationship) or -1 (perfect negative linear relationship) it is usually reported in term of its square (r ) interpreted as percent of variance explained (Hair et al, 2006) the used of partial correlation is usually restricted to simple model of 3 or 4 variables, 5 most (Cohen, 1983)
2

4.3 F-test. The function of Ftest is to see and understand the influence of both independent variables toward dependent variables. Steps of this test: a. Create formulation the hypothesis

Ho: b1 = b2 = b3 = b4 = 0, there was no influence that is significant from the independent variable (X) together against the dependent variable (Y) Ha: b1 b2 b3 b4 0, there was influence that is significant from the independent variable (X) together against the dependent variable (Y) b. Determine the level of the significant of 5% 43

c. Tested the hypothesis with the provision. If the significant < 0.05; so Ha accepted and Ho rejected, if significant > 0.05; so Ha rejected and Ho accepted. d. Interestingly the conclusion was based on result of testing.

4.4 t-test. According Bhuono Theories (2005) if ttest > ttable therefore Ho rejected and Ha accepted, that means independent variables partially as influence significantly toward dependent variable. If ttest <

ttable therefore Ho accepted and Ha rejected, that means independent variable partially has no influence significantly toward dependent variable. Level of significant use amount 5% or () 0.05

G. Operational Variable. Operational variable is a statement of the specific dimensions and elements through which a concept will become measurable (Sekaran, 2006). There are two kinds of variable, which are independent variable

and dependent variable, on these variables we define into dimension and indicator to me a question.

44

1. Independent Variable. Independent variable is also known as the predictor variable. It is one that influence the dependent variable either in a positive or negative ways (Cavana, Delahaye, & Sekaran, 2001). The independent variables studied in this research are promotion, service quality,

customer experiences and brand.

a. Promotion. Promotion may be defined as the co-ordination of all seller initiated efforts to set up channels of information and persuasion to facilitate the scale of a good or service. Promotion is most often intended to be a supporting component in a marketing mix. Promotion decision must be integrated marketing and co-ordinate with the rest of the

mix, particularly product/brand decision, so that is may

effectively supports an entire marketing mix strategy. The promotion mix consists: Advertising is the dissemination of information by non personal means through paid media where the source is the sponsoring organization. Personal selling is the dissemination of information by non personal method, like face to face, contacts between audience and

employees of the sponsoring organization. The source of information is the sponsoring organization. 45

Publicity is the disseminating of information by personal or non personal means and is not directly paid by organization and the organization is not the source.

Selling promotion is the dissemination of information through wide variety of activities other than personal selling, advertising and publicity which stimulate consumer purchasing and dealer

effectiveness

b. Service quality. Service quality measure from SERQUAL by panama, there five common item used to measure customer satisfaction are: Tangible is appearance of physical facilities, equipment,

personnel, and communication materials. Reliability is ability to perform the promised service dependably and accurately. Responsiveness is willingness to help customers and provide prompt service. Assurance is knowledge and courtesy of employees and their ability to convey trust and confidence. Empathy is the firm provides care and individualized attention to its customers.

46

c. Customer Experiences. Customer experiences included on-time departure, safety, better service, cheaper airfares, and easy booking. On time departure refer to the time is stated in ticket are implies to the departure time. Safety refers to the customer feel comfortable and safe from any other afraid. Better service is how the crew or employee provide the maximal service to the customer or passenger Cheaper airfare is low to pay for ticket or low price Easy booking refer to the easy way of customer to booking ticket online, and any requirement include in the procedural

d. Brand. According to Keller (2008) states that bran can be divine into two dimensions that are brand image and brand awareness. Brand image refer to recognition of the name, symbol, logo, and any combination of them Brand awareness mean that the brand already recognition and famous in customer mind, since the brand become one of the product or service with the best alternative.

47

2. Dependent Variable. The dependent variable is the primary interest of this research, which is customer satisfaction. In Customer satisfaction can be measure with promotion, service quality, and customer experiences and also brand. Here is the formula for measure relationship between variable:

Table 3.5 Relationship between Variable, Dimension and Indicator VARIABLE DIMENSION Advertising. INDICATOR 1. Advertising affects Customer satisfaction 2. Launching program affects customer satisfaction 3. Personal selling affects customer satisfaction SCALE

(X1) Promotion
Onwuchuruba (2002:115)

Personal Selling.

Ordinal

4. Radio or television affects purchase and customer satisfaction 5. Dummy service affects Sales Promotions. customer satisfaction Tangibles 1. Appearance physical facilities (X2) Service affect customer satisfaction. Quality Parasuraman, 2. Knowledge or courtesy or Assurance Berry et al. employee affects customer 1985; satisfaction. Parasuraman, Reliability 3. Service dependably affects Berry et al. customer satisfaction 1988; Zeithaml, Responsiveness 4. Individualized attention Parasuraman et affect customer satisfaction al. 1990; Parasuraman, 5. Welcome to help customers Berry et al. Empathy and prompt service affects 1991; customer satisfaction. Parasuraman, Berry et al. Publicity.

Ordinal

48

1993; Parasuraman, Berry et al. 1994) On Time Departure Safety. (X4) Customer Experiences (Pine & Gilmore, 1990) Better Service. Cheaper Airfares. Easy Booking Image Awareness Promotion Service Quality (Y) Customer Satisfaction Customer Experiences Brand 1. Schedule manage affected customer satisfaction 2. Safety affects customer satisfaction 3. Better service affect customer satisfaction 4. Low price affect customer satisfaction 5. Uncomplicated in purchasing affects customer satisfaction 1. Image affects customer Satisfaction 2. Awareness to brand affects customer satisfaction 1. Promotion affects customer satisfaction 2. Service quality affects customer satisfaction 3. Customer Experiences affects customer satisfaction 4. Brand affects customer satisfaction Ordinal

(X3) Brand Kevin Lane Keller (2008)

Ordinal

Ordinal

49

H. Variable Measurement. The variable in the questionnaire are categorized into the groups according to the framework of this research, the variable are measured in some ways that will be able to test the hypotheses, however in attempt to reduce the scale bias, Linkert Kind of scale are used to measure the dependent and independent variables (Sekaran, 2006). The questionnaire used is closed questions refer to the alternative that are mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive give to the respondent, it can make them quick and easy to interpret. Here are the question build from indicator that measured from each dimension of variables.

50

Table 3.6 Questionnaire Development

Dimensions (X1) Promotion Advertising. Personal Selling. Publicity. Sales Promotions. (X2)Service Quality Tangibles Assurance Reliability Responsiveness Empathy (X3) Customer Experiences On Time Departure Safety. Better Service. Cheaper Airfares. Easy Booking, (X4) Brand Image Awareness

Questionnaire Promotion with advertisement influence my satisfaction Launching program influence my satisfaction Personal selling influence my satisfaction easy than other Radio or Television influence my satisfaction Sales promotion affect my customer satisfaction AirAsias facilities, equipment, personnel, and communication materials are visible. Knowledge, courtesy and ability of employee can convey my trust and confidence. AirAsia able to perform the promised service accurately. AirAsias crew or employee willingness to help customers The firm provides individualized attention to the customers. Schedule stated in my ticket is managed on the time. I felt safety with my flight I felt comfortable to the crew serve me with better service Flight with the low fare influence my travel I enjoyed with procedures and not complicated when I book ticket online Brand image play an important role in my decision to booking ticket online I aware, if someone asked me about Airlines, I will ask him or her to purchase AirAsias ticket.

50

CHAPTER IV FINDING AND ANALYSIS

A. General Description of Research Object. This chapter present the findings of the study, it discussed all the findings which through statistical analysis to show the analysis and discussion as the result of the data analysis. This research is conducted in term of descriptive study. This chapter also deals with construct assessment of the variables in the main study. Firstly, the main study respondents purification demographic of the measurement

construct assessment discusses profiles and

variables, secondly the hypotheses testing presented through correlation, regression. This research is conducted in term of descriptive manner to determine the evidences and factors behind measures behavior of computerized information system at college. The selection of respondent recorded in the form of online questionnaire and choosing an appropriate study design with adequate sample size. Questionnaire were distributed to 250 Indonesian students in 5 universities (UUM, IIUM, UTM, USM and UM) who are ever travel with AirAsia (customer), after 2 weeks, the there 220 questionnaires those respondents have answered the entire question. For the following steps described the profile of respondents as collected from 200

questionnaires completely. 51

1. Gender. Based on the respondent gender such as male and female so the result of the analysis the data could be see the table 4.1 below

Table 4.1 The Gender of Respondent

Measurement Gender

Item Male Female Total

Respondent (N) 71 129 200

Percentage (%) 35.5% 64.5% 100%

Source: Primary data, made based on Appendix II (4.1)

Based on the table 4.1 shows that the respondent gender from 200 questionnaires which be sample in this research found the majority respondent are female, 129 (64%) female and just 71 (35.5%) male respondent.

2. Age Level. Based on the respondent age level, so the result of the analysis the data could be see the table 4.2 below

52

Table 4.2 The Age of Respondent

Measurement

Age

Item Respondent (N) Percentage (%) < 20 99 49.5% 21 25 85 42.5% 26 30 11 5.5% > 30 5 2.5% Total 200 100% Source: Primary data, made based on appendix II (4.2)

The Third question in the questionnaire was about the age of the respondent. For this question I got information that the highest frequency of age is related to the age group > 21 25 where they are 99 (49.5%) of respondents and the lowest frequency of age is related to the age groups 35 and more 5 (2.5%). This means all the respondents in period age from < 20 years old to 30 years old.

3. Education Level. Based on the respondent education, so the result of the analysis the data could be see the table 4.3 below

53

Table 4.3 Education Level

Measurement Item Respondent (N) Percentage (%) Diploma 0 0% Degree 182 91% Education Master 11 5.5% Level Doctoral 7 3.5% Total 200 100% Source: Primary data, made base on appendix II (4.3)

Base on the table 4.3 level of education, most of the respondents are degree students, where 182 (91%) of the respondents are studying degree and 11 (5.5%) respondents are studying master and other respondents 7 (3.5%) are belonging to the doctoral level.

4. Number of Purchase. Based on the respondent number of purchase, so the result of the analysis the data could be sees the table 4.4

Table 4.4 The Number of Purchase in a Year Measurement Item X < 1 in a year 2 4 in a year Number of 5 7 in a year Purchase Total Respondent (N) 12 169 19 200 Percentage (%) 6% 84.5% 9.5% 100%

Source: Primary data, made base on appendix II (4.4)

54

For the section of number of purchases, all of the respondents have experiences to purchase ticket through the internet but there is different of number of times that the respondents purchase with. The majority of respondent purchase is between 2 or more than 2 times in a year where, there are 12 (6%) of the respondents never purchase or just

purchase one time in a year, furthermore, there are 169 (84%) of the respondent purchase 2 to 4 time in a year. The, there are 19 (9.5%) of the respondent purchase from 5 to 7 times in a year.

5. College. Based on the respondent college, so the result of the analysis the data could be see the table 4.5

Table 4.5 The College of Respondent

Item Measurement UM IIUM USM UTM UM Total

Respondent (N) 58 40 24 34 44 200

Percentage (%) 29% 20% 12% 17% 22% 100%

Universities

Source: Primary data, made base on Appendix II (4.5) 55

B. Validity and Reliability. In this study, validity testing was using statistic method of product moment Pearson, and reliability testing was using reliability coefficient (Cronbach Alpha).

1. Validity Test Result. By using significant level () = 5% and N 30, so rvalue table is 0.3610. If rXY is more than rvalue, means that there is a real correlation between variables. The result of validity testing is summarized 4.6

56

Table 4.6 Validity Test Result Item rtest rvalue X1.1 0.4729 0.3610 X1.2 0.5220 0.3610 (X1) X1.3 0.4719 0.3610 Promotion X1.4 0.3985 0.3610 X1.5 0.4615 0.3610 X2.1 0.4992 0.3610 X2.2 0.4878 0.3610 (X2) X2.3 0.5498 0.3610 Service Quality X2.4 0.5106 0.3610 X2.5 0.4784 0.3610 X3.1 0.4784 0.3610 (X3) X3.2 0.4650 0.3610 Customer X3.3 0.5768 0.3610 Experiences X3.4 0.5232 0.3610 X3.5 0.5697 0.3610 (X) X4.2 0.4714 0.3610 X4.3 0.6167 0.3610 Brand X5.1 0.4983 0.3610 (Y) X5.2 0.4883 0.3610 Customer X5.3 0.4606 0.3610 Satisfaction X5.4 0.5069 0.3610 Source: Appendix II (4.6) Variable Description Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid

The result of validity testing for the questionnaire of study as shown in table 4. 6 above that the result is Valid (rtest > rscore)

2. Reliability Test.

The result of reliability testing is summarized in table 4.7 As follows:

57

Table 4.7 Result of Reliability

Variable Cronbachs Alpha N of item Promotion 0.6181 5 Service Quality 0.7971 5 Customer Experiences 0.7145 5 Brand 0.4164 2 Source: primer data, made base on Appendix II (4.7)

Table 4.7 above, shows that alpha point of study instrument every item are greater than 0.60, thus can conclude that the instrument of questionnaire is reliable, Cronbachs Alpha of promotion, service quality and customer experiences is above 0.60 and categorize high reliabilit y according to table 3.3 (category high and low reliable) while reliability category for brand is sufficient.

C. Descriptive Analysis. 1. Evaluation of Promotion Variable. The responses of respondents on promotion variable shown in table 4.8 bellow

58

Table 4.8 The Promotion Variable Frequency

No

Questions I think promotion with advertisement influence my satisfaction Personal Selling influence my satisfaction easy than other. Launching Program impact my satisfaction and interesting me to buy ticket online Radio and television Influence my satisfaction Sales promotion make me deep understand and affect my customer satisfaction Total 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Responses Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Strongly Disagreed Disagreed Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

Mean N=200 4.49

Frequency Absolute Relatives 3 10 74 103 2 16 111 71 3 26 90 81 5 23 98 74 90 25 51 34 1.5 5.0 37.0 56.5 1.0 8.0 55.5 35.5 1.5 13.0 45.0 40.5 2.5 11.5 49.0 37.0 45.0 12.5 25.5 17.0

4.25

4.24

4.21

3.15

4.07 Source: Primary data, Made based on Appendix II (4.8)

Base on the table 4.8 above can be explained that majority of response from the respondent for items of promotion is agree until strongly agree. The responses from the respondent, every item in the table above are as following

59

a. The respond for item that, promotion with advertisement is ver y influence satisfaction are 1.5 % disagree, 5.0% neutral, 37% agree and 56.5% strongly agree. b. The respond for item that, personal selling influence satisfaction are 1.0 % disagree, 8.0% neutral, 55.5% agree and 35.5% strongly agree. c. The respond for item that, launching program impact satisfaction and interesting customer to buy ticket online are 1.5 % disagree, 13.0% neutral, 45.0% agree and 40.5% strongly agree. d. The respond for item that, radio and television influence satisfaction are 2.5 % disagree, 11.0% neutral, 49.0% agree and 37.0% strongly agree. e. The respond for item that, sales promotion makes deeply understand and affect customer satisfaction are 45.0 % disagree, 12.5%

neutral, 25.5% agree and 17.0% strongly agree. The total mean of promotion variable is 4.07 with answer of value of higher average 4.49 of the statement promotion using advertisement is very informative that influence my satisfaction and the lower is sales promotion affect customer satisfaction by average 3.15. Thus can conclude that the most of respondent satisfied with the promotion by appraise toward advertisement in affected the customer satisfaction.

60

2. Evaluation of Service Quality Variable. Responses of respondents on service quality variable shown in table 4.9 bellow

Table 4.9 The Service Quality Variable Frequency

No

Questions AirAsias facilities, equipment, personnel, and communication materials are visible. Knowledge, courtesy and ability of employee convey my trust and confidence AirAsia able to perform the promised service dependably and accurately. AirAsias crew or employee willingness to help customers and provide prompt service. The firm provides care and individualized attention to the customers. Total 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Responses Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

Mean N=200 3.15

Frequency Absolute Relatives 3 1.5 51 25.5 37 18.5 92 46 17 8.5 41 35 78 46 48 39 52 61 1 45 33 82 39 3 53 47 82 15 20.5 17.5 39.0 23.0 24.0 19.5 26.0 30.5 0.5 22.5 16.5 41.0 19.5 1.5 26.5 23.5 41.0 7.5

2 3

3.65

3.63

3.56

3.26

3.45 Source: Primary data, made base on Appendix II (4.9)

61

Base on the table 4.9 above can be explained that majority of response from the respondent for items of service quality is agree. The responses from the respondent, every item in the table above are as following a. The respond for item that, AirAsias facilities, equipment, personnel, and communication materials are visible, are 1.5 % strongly disagree, 25.5% disagree, 18.5% neutral, 46% agree and 8.5% strongly agree. b. The respond for item that, knowledge and courtesy of employees and their ability to convey the customer trust and confidence, are 20.5 % disagree, 17.5% neutral, 39.0% agree and 23.0% strongly agree. c. The respond for item that, AirAsia able to perform the promised service dependably and accurately, are 24.0 % disagree, 19.5% neutral, 26.0% agree and 30.5% strongly agree. d. The respond for item that, AirAsias crew or employee willingness to help customers and provide prompt service, are 0.5% strongly disagree, 22.5 % disagree, 16.5% neutral, 41.0% agree and 19.5% strongly agree. e. The respond for item that, sales The firm provides care and individualized disagree, 26.5 % disagree, 23.5% neutral, 41.0% agree and 7.5% strongly agree. The total mean of service quality variable is 3.45. With answer of value of higher average 3.65 of the statement knowledge, courtesy and ability of employees can convey the customer trust and confidence and the 62 attention to the customers, are 1.5% strongly

lower

is

item

AirAsias

facilities,

equipment,

personnel,

and

63

communication materials are visible by average 3.15. so, knowledge, courtesy of employees ability of employee affected the customer satisfaction.

64

3. Evaluation of Customer Experiences Variable. Responses of respondents on customer experiences variable shown in table 4.10.

Table 4.10 The Customer Experiences Frequency

No

Questions

Responses

Mean N=200

Frequency Absolute Relatives 35.0 16.5 34.5 14.0 0.5 35.0 29.0 29.0 6.5 4.5 15.5 43.0 37.0 2.5 20.5 31.0 46.0 6.0 12.0 46.0 36.0

1. Strongly Disagree Schedule stated in my 2. Disagree 70 ticket is manage and on the 3. Neutral 3.28 33 time. 4. Agree 69 5. Strongly Agree 28 1. Strongly Disagree 1 2. Disagree 70 I feel safety with my flight 3. Neutral 4.06 58 4. Agree 58 5. Strongly Agree 13 1. Strongly Disagree I feel comfortable and 2. Disagree 11 believe to the crew or 3. Neutral 4.08 34 employee serve me with 4. Agree 83 better service 5. Strongly Agree 72 1. Strongly Disagree 2. Disagree 5 Flight with the low fare 3. Neutral 4.20 41 influence my travel 4. Agree 62 5. Strongly Agree 92 1. Strongly Disagree I enjoy with procedures 2. Disagree 12 and not complicated when 3. Neutral 3.12 24 I book ticket online 4. Agree 92 5. Strongly Agree 72 Total 3.75 Source: Primary data, made base on Appendix II (4.10)

65

Base on the table 4.10 above can be explained that majority of response from the respondent for items of customer experiences is average between disagree, agree until strongly agree. The responses from the respondent, every item in the table above are as following a. The respond for item that, schedule stated on the ticket is managed and on the time are 35.0 % disagree, 16.5% neutral, 34.5% agree and 14.0% strongly agree. b. The respond for item that, customers feel safety and not worried with the flight are 0.5 % strongly disagree, 35.0% disagree, 29.0% neutral, 29.0% agree, and 6.5% strongly agree. c. The respond for item that, customers feel comfortable and believe to the crew or employee disagree, 15.5% neutral, 43.0% agree and 37.0% strongly agree. d. The respond for item that, flight with the low fare influence customer travel are 2.5 % disagree, 20.5% neutral 31.0% agree and 46.0% strongly agree. e. The respond for item that, customers enjoy with procedures and not complicated when they book ticket online are 6.0 % disagree, 12.0% neutral, 46.0% agree and 36.0% strongly agree. The total mean of customer experiences variable is 3.75 with answer of value of higher average 4.20 of the statement flight with the low fare influence customer travel and the lower is customers enjoy with procedures and not complicated when they book ticket online by mean 66 serve them with better service are 4.5 %

3.12. Can conclude that the flight with the low fare influence customer travel.

4. Evaluation of Brand Variable. Responses of respondents on brand variable shown in table 4.11

Table 4.11 Brand Variable Frequency

No

Questions Brand Image play an important role in my decision to booking ticket online I aware, If someone asked me about Airlines, I will ask him or her to purchase AirAsias Ticket 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Responses Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

Mean N=200 3.94

Frequency Absolute Relatives 4 44 112 40 7 80 98 15 2.0 22.0 56.0 20.0 3.5 4.0 49.0 7.5

3.60

3.77 Source: Primary data, made base on Appendix II (4.11)

Base on the table 4.11 above can be explained that majority of response from the respondent for items of brand is agree. The

responses from the respondent, every item in the table above are as following a. The respond for item that, brand plays an important role in decision to booking ticket online are 2.0 % disagree, 22.0% neutral, 56.0% 67

agree

68

and 20.0% strongly agree. b. The respond for item that, customers aware, if someone asked them about Airlines, they will ask him or her to purchase AirAsias ticket are 3.5% disagree, 4.0% neutral, 49.0% agree, and 7.5% strongly agree. The total mean of brand variable is 3.77, with answer of value of higher average 3.94 of the statement brand image play an important role than brand awareness plays an important role when in customer purchase decision by mean 3.60. Thus can conclude that the most of respondent put the brand image as important role.

69

5. Evaluation of Customer Satisfaction Variable. For the evaluation of customer satisfaction as independent variable, the responses of respondents on this variable shown in table 4.12

Table 4.12 The Customer Satisfaction Variable Frequency

No

Questions AirAsias promotion Impact my purchase decision and my satisfaction

Responses

Mean N =200

1. Strongly Disagree 2. Disagree 3. Neutral 4.43 4. Agree 5. Strongly Agree Service Quality is impact 1. Strongly Disagree 2. Disagree 51 mu purchase decision in booking ticket and my 3. Neutral 3.37 77 satisfaction 4. Agree 50 5. Strongly Agree 22 My experiences is impact 1. Strongly Disagree satisfaction in booking 2. Disagree 10 ticket 3. Neutral 3.53 94 4. Agree 74 5. Strongly Agree 22 My decision to booking 6. Strongly Disagree 3 ticket via online depend on 7. Disagree 11 my knowledge of the brand 8. Neutral 4.01 26 being offered 9. Agree 87 10. Strongly Agree 73 Total 3.83 Source: Primary data, made base on Appendix II (4.12)

Frequency Absolute Relatives 1 0.5 2 1.0 10 5.0 83 41.5 104 52.0 25.5 38.5 25.0 11.0 5.5 47.0 37.0 11.0 1.5 5.5 13.0 43.5 36.5

70

Base on the table 4.12 above can be explained that majority of response from the respondent for customer satisfaction variables is average between neutral until agree. The responses from the respondent, every item in the table above are as following a. The respond for item that, promotion impact purchase decision and satisfaction, are 0.5% strongly disagree, 1.0 % disagree, 5.0% neutral, 41.5% agree and 52.0% strongly agree. b. The respond for item that, customers service quality is impact purchase decision and customer satisfaction, are 25.5% disagree, 38.5% neutral, 25.0% agree, and 11.5% strongly agree. c. The respond for item that, customers experiences is impact satisfaction are 5.5 % disagree, 47.0% neutral, 37.0% agree and 11.0% strongly agree. d. The respond for item that, brand is impact customer satisfaction are 1.5 % strongly disagree, 5.5% disagree, 13.0% neutral 43.5% agree and 36.5% strongly agree.

The total mean of customer satisfaction variable is 3.83 with answer of value of higher average 4.43% of the statement promotion impact purchase decision and satisfaction and the lower is customers service quality is impact purchase decision and customer satisfaction by mean 3.37. Thus can conclude that the most of respondent booking ticket and their satisfaction influenced by promotion. 71

D. Multiple Linear Regressions. 1. Regression Analysis. Based on the discussion made in subsection H of Chapter 2, four hypotheses were formulated. The following four hypotheses have been given below: H1 : Promotion positively related to the customer satisfaction on purchase decision when they booking online. H2 : Service quality positively related to customer satisfaction in purchase decision on ticket online H3 : Customer experiences and customer positively related. H4 : Brand plays an important role to the customer satisfaction in purchase decision. Regression analysis is used to test the hypothesized relationship among the variables; the result of each hypothesis is summarized here. All result above measure with = 0.05. satisfaction are

1.5 Customer Satisfaction and Promotion. The first regression analysis was carried out to determine and the relationship between promotion and customer satisfaction when they make purchase decision. The regression output is presented in table 4.13.1(a) and 4.13.1(b)

70

To support the hypnotized relationship between two variables, to determinants have chosen which is purchasing decision based on the information that received by particular customer in online and customer satisfaction in booking ticket online in AirAsia. The output shows the Durbin Watson value is 2.039, which indicates that there no auto-correlation problem of error term. From the coefficient matrix of this model, customer satisfaction based on the information about that received by particular customer in online is significant at t = 7.057 and P = 0.00 < 0.05, which support H1. The P value indicating that purchase decision online has relationship between the promotion and customer satisfaction which shown in table 4.13.1 (a) and 4.1.1 (b).

Table 4.13.1 (a) Model Summary

Model 1

R .448(a)

R Square .201

Adjusted R Square .197

Std. Error of the Estimate .39462

Change Statistics R Square Change .201 F Change 49.798 df1 1 df2 198 Sig. F Change .000

DurbinWatson 2.039

a Predictors: (Constant), Promotion b Dependent Variable: Customer Satisfaction

71

Table 4.13.1 (b) Coefficients

Model 1 (Constant) Promotion

Unstandardized Coefficients B 2.538 .289 Std. Error .183 .041

Standardized Coefficients Beta .448

T 13.833 7.057

Sig. .000 .000

a Dependent Variable: Customer Satisfaction

1.6 Customer Satisfaction and Service Quality. The second regression analysis was carried out to determine the relationship between service quality and customer

satisfaction when they booking ticket online. The regression output is presented in table 4.13.2 (a) and 4.13.2 (b). To support the hypnotized relationship between variable, mean value of the variables have been chosen from service qualit y which is service quality is major criteria to booking online and service quality is major concern to purchase online.

And satisfaction of booking ticket needs purchasing online The output for service quality is major criteria to booking online and satisfaction of booking needs shows the Durbin Watson value is 2.123, the result of Durbin Watson also indicates that there is no auto-correlation problem of error term. From the

coefficient matrix of this model, service quality is major criteria to booking 72

online is significant at t = 12.92 and P = 0.00 < 0.05, which support H1 . The service quality support H2. This mean the service quality has a relationship with customer satisfaction which indicating from table 4.13.2 (a) and 4.13.2 (b)

Table 4.13.2 (a) Model Summary

Model 1

R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate .32509

Change Statistics R Square Change .458 Sig. F Change .000 DurbinWatson 2.123

.677(a) .458 .455 a Predictors: (Constant), Service Quality

F Change 167.131

df1 1

df2 198

b Dependent Variable: Customer Satisfaction

Table 4.13.2 (b) Coefficients

Model 1 (Constant)

B Std. Error 2.810 .081 Service Quality .313 .024 a Dependent Variable: Customer Satisfaction

1.7 Customer Satisfaction and Customer Experiences The Third regression analysis was carried out to determine the relationship between role of customer experiences to purchase 73

online and customer satisfaction. The regression output is presented in table 4.13.3 (a) and 4.13.3 (b). To support the hypotheses relationship between two variable, two determinants have been chosen from customer experiences and customer satisfaction which is experiences of customer when purchase ticket online and customer satisfaction of booking needs purchasing online. The output for customer experiences shows the Durbin Watson value is close to 2 (1.983) , which there is no autocorrelation problem of error term. The result of Durbin Watson also indicates that there is positive serial correlation. According to the rule of Durbin Watson. If the Durbin Watson statistic is substantially less than 2, there is evidence of positive serial correlation. From the coefficient matrix of this model, customer satisfaction is significant at t = 8.920 and P = 0.00 < 0.05. The result supports H3. It means the customer experiences and the customer satisfaction is positively related which indicating from table 4.13.3 (a) and 4.13.3 (b)

74

Table 4.13.3 (a) Model Summary

Model 1

R .535(a)

R Square .287

Adjusted R Square .283

Std. Error of the Estimate .37287

Change Statistics R Square Change .287 F Change 79.559 df1 1 df2 198 Sig. F Change .000

DurbinWatson 1.983

a Predictors: (Constant), Experiences b Dependent Variable: Customer Satisfaction

Table 4.13.3 (b) Coefficients

Model 1 (Constant) Experience

Unstandardized Coefficients B 2.713 .312 Std. Error .127 .035

Standardized Coefficients Beta .535

t 21.436 8.920

Sig. .000 .000

a Dependent Variable: Customer Satisfaction

1.8 Customer Satisfaction and Brand. The last regression analysis was carried out to determine the relationship between role of brand to purchase online and customer satisfaction the regression output is presented in table 4.13.4 (a) and 4.13.4 (b). To support the hypotheses relationship between two variables, two determinants have been chosen from brand and 75

customer satisfaction which is Brand plays an important role to

76

purchase decision on ticket online and customer satisfaction The output for brands plays an important role to purchase decision on ticket online and customer satisfaction shows the Durbin Watson value is close to 1.880, which there was no auto- correlation problem of error term. The result of Durbin Watson also indicates that there is positive serial correlation. According to the rule of Durbin Watson. If the Durbin Watson statistic is substantially less than 2, there is evidence of positive serial correlation. From the coefficient matrix of this model, brand plays an important role to customer satisfaction is significant at t = 6.935 and P = 0.00 < 0.05. This result supports H4. It means Brand plays an important role when customer purchase ticket online to satisfy them

Table 4.13.4 (a) Model Summary

Model 1

R Square

Adjusted R Square

Change Statistics R Square Change F Change .195 48.092 df1 1 df2 198 Sig. F Change .000

DurbinWatson 1.880

.442(a) .195 .191 a Predictors: (Constant), Brand

b Dependent Variable: Customer Satisfaction

77

Table 4.13.3 (a) Coefficients

Model 1 (Constant) Brand

Unstandardized Coefficients B 2.955 .211 Std. Error .127 .030

Standardized Coefficients Beta .442

t 23.177 6.935

Sig. .000 .000

a Dependent Variable: Customer Satisfaction

2. Correlation.

Table 4.14 Correlations Result

Variables

Customer satisfaction Sig. (1 tailed) N 200 Promotion 0.448 1 Sig. (1 tailed) 0.000 N 200 200 Service quality 0.677 0.103 1 Sig. (1 tailed) 0.000 0.074 N 200 200 200 Customer 0.535 0.117 0.222 Experiences 0.000 0.050 0.001 Sig. (1 tailed) 200 200 200 N Brand 0.442 -0.087 0.003 Sig. (1 tailed) 0.000 0.109 0.482 200 200 200 N Source: Primary data, made base on Appendix II (4.14)

Customer Promotion satisfaction 1

Service Quality

Customer Experiences

Brand

1 200 -0.113 0.056 200 1 200

78

As shown in the table 4.14, the correlation value of perceived quality toward promotion is 0.448, the correlation toward service quality is 0.677, the correlation toward customer experiences is 0.535 and the correlation toward brand is 0.442, it shows correlation between variable customer satisfaction and service quality has higher correlation than promotion, customer experiences and brand, the significant value of correlation coefficient is 0.000. It means, there are any relation between promotion, service quality, customer experiences and brand.

3. Coefficient Determinant. Coefficient determinant (R ) test is show how strong the ability to explain the variation of dependent variables. The value of R is between figures 0 to 1. If the value of R is low, means the ability of independent variable that explain the variation of dependent variables is limited (weak). But, if the value of R approaching figure 1, means independent variable offer all of necessity information to predict dependent (Ghozali, 2006). The output for coefficient determinant (R ) form dependent and independent variable is presented in table 4.15
2 2 2 2 2

variable

79

Table 4.15 Coefficient Determinants (R ) Model Summary

Model

R Square

Adjusted R Square

1 .856(a) .732 .723 a Predictors: (Constant), Promotion, Service Quality, Experiences, Brand b Dependent Variable: Customer Satisfaction

From table 4.13.5, the adjusted R is 0.723 or 72%. This mean, there is 72% Independent variables; promotion, service quality, customer experiences and brand affect dependent variable; customer satisfaction, the score of adjusted R square is also called as coefficient determinant.

4. F-test. ANOVA

Model 1

Regression Residual Total

Sum of Squares 28.250 10.339 38.589

Df 3 196 199

Mean Square 9.417 .053

F 178.522

Sig. .000

a Predictors: (Constant), Promotion, Service Quality, Experiences e Dependent Variable: Customer Satisfaction

ANOVA test will bear Ftest around 178.522 with level of significant is 0.000 because the number of probability is 0.000 < 0.05 80

so

81

Ha

is

accepted and H0 is rejected. It is means that promotion, service customer experiences altogether has influence of

quality and significant online.

of affected to the customer satisfaction in booking ticket

Beside by comparing Ftest with Ftable with standard error 0.05 and degree of freedom (df) 3 = 196 (200 - 4) therefore obtain Ftable = 2.60, the score of Ftest is 178.522 > Ftable 2.60, therefore Ho rejacted and Ho accepted, hence the conclusion of four independent variable simultaneusly have been afffected toward customer satisfaction 5.

t-test.
ttest of parameter significant to variable of promotion, service

quality, customer experiences and brand affected customer satisfaction toward purchase decision on ticket online, here we use of linear regression (Appendix 4.13) a. The tested toward regression coefficient of the variable promotion The calculation result of linear regression got significant obtained with value are 0.000 it mean that probability of ttest 9.308 > ttable 1.645 so that Ha Accepted or Ho rejected, it means that on the variable promotion partially did have significant influenced to customer satisfaction. b. The tested toward regression coefficient of the variable service quality The calculation result of linear regression got significant obtained with value are 0.000 it mean that probability of ttest 14.680 > ttable 1.645 so that Ha Accepted or Ho rejected, it means that on the 80

variable service quality partially did have significant influenced to customer satisfaction.

81

c. The tested toward linear regression coefficient of the variable customer experiences The calculation result of linear regression got significant obtained with value are 0.000 it mean that probability of ttest 9.728 > ttable 1.645. so that Ha Accepted or Ho rejected, it means that on the variable customer experiences partially did have significant influenced to customer satisfaction. d. The tested toward linear regression coefficient of the variable brand The calculation result of linear regression got significant obtained with value at ttest = 6.935 and P = 0.00 < 0.05.0.000 so that Ha Accepted or Ho rejected, it means that on the variable brand partially did have significant influenced to customer satisfaction.

82

E. Summary. This study highlight four important independent variable that affect customer satisfaction in purchase decision on ticket online which is shown in below :

Hypotheses H1 : Promotion positively related to the customer satisfaction on purchase decision when they booking online. H2 : Service quality positively related to customer

Result Accepted

satisfaction in purchase decision on ticket online H3 : Customer experiences and customer satisfaction are positively related. H4 : Brand plays an important role to the customer

Accepted

Accepted

Accepted satisfaction in purchase decision.

83

CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATION

A. Conclusion. Customer satisfaction is the fundamental to the marketing concept. This study was conducted with purpose of measuring customer

satisfaction. Specially, the first objective of this study was to examine the relationship between customer satisfaction to promotion, service quality, customer experiences and brand. Promotion, service quality, customer experiences and brand are key determinant of customer satisfaction through purchase decision on ticket online. All variables are supported in customer satisfaction. Finally it could be concluded that, there is a significant

positive relationship between the promotion, service quality, customer experiences and brand to customer satisfaction.

B. Implication of Study. Several actions can be taken by marketer to satisfy the customer when booking ticket online. Establishing the marketing policy in online marketplace and offline marketplace can help to prevent hesitate between online customer satisfaction and independent variables. The marketer should be focused on customer demands, which are a commitment to satisfy customer 84

needs and expectations, monitoring of customer satisfaction, responsiveness to customer complaint, a high and continuous level interaction with customers.

C. Recommendation. Future researchers can focus on following suggestion. First, widen the coverage of present study to include not only university student but also other level of people can participate in this future study. Second, future researchers can increase the variables. It could be either both (dependent and independent variables, it is up to researcher). Third, future researcher can examine the study in broader scale such as factor analysis based on data collected using SPSS 17.0. Fourth, future researcher can increase number of hypothesis

D. Limitation 1. This study is not representing the wide variety of customers, it only conducted to AirAsias customer who are Indonesian student in Malaysia chosen as the respondents who ever use e-ticket. 2. This study only focus on factors affecting customer satisfaction in purchase decision on ticket online issued by AirAsia, and the relationship, because Airasia generate high customer and more popular than other on this time, it is not measure the other Airline.

85

REFEERENCES

Ahasanul Haque & Ali Khatibi. (2007). The impact of internet marketing on customer satisfaction. A study Malaysian perspective. Journal of Mobile Communication 1 (1) 29-35 AirAsia. (2003). Welcome to AirAsia, Now Everyone Can Fly. Retrieved November 4, 2003 form the www.http//airasia.cco m Anderson, E.W. & Sillivan, M. W. (1993). The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction from firms. Marketing Science, 12(2 Spring) Asubonteng, P., K.J. Mccleary, and J.E. Swan, (1996). SERVQUAL Revisited: A critical review of service quality, Journal of Science Marketing, 10(6), pp 62 81 Barsky, J. (1995), World-Class Customer Satisfaction, Irwin Professional, Burr Ridge, IL. Besterfield, D.H. (1994), Quality Control, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Bitner, M, J., & Hubbert, A, R, (1994), Encounter satisfaction versus overall satisfaction versus quality Bitner, M.J., & Amy R. Hubbert (1994), "Encounter satisfaction versus overall satisfaction versus quality," in service quality: new directions in theory and practice, Roland T. Rust and Richard L. Oliver, eds. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 72-94. Birch & Young (1997). The Second Annual Ernst & Young Internet Shopping Study, Ernst & Young, New York, NY Brady, M. K & Cronin, J.J (2001). Some new though conceptualizing perceive service quality; a hierarchical approach. Journal of Marketing, 65. Chrisnal, P.M. (1997). Marketing Research (5 Ed.) Cambridge (UK). University Press Boshoff, C (1997), An experimental study of service recovery option. International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 210-219. Chandon P, Wansink B, Laurent G. A benefit congruency framework of sales promotion effectiveness. J Mark 2000;64:65 81 [October]

Christopher, M. (1996), From brand values to customer values. Journal of Marketing Practices: Applied Marketing Science, Vol. 2, pp.55-66, University Press, NY. Churcill, G., & C. Suprenat. (1982). An investigation into the determinants of customer satisfaction, Journal of Marketing Research Cronin, J. Joseph, Jr. and Steven A. Taylor (1992), SERVPERF Versus SERVQUAL: reconciling performance-based and perceptionsminus- expectations measurement of service quality, Journal of Marketing, 58 (January), 125-131. Crosby, Philip B. (1979), Quality Is Free. The Art of Making Quality Certain, New York: New American Library. Cohen, (1988). Trading Electronically An e-commerce primer for small business. Retrieved 15 jun 2007, from.ecommerce.ac.uk Copeland, Duncan G.; Mason, Richard O.; and McKenney, James L. 1995, Sabre: The development of information-based competence and execution of information-based competition, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, Vol. 17, No. 3 (Fall), pp. 30-55. Day, R., & E. London. (1977). Toward a theory of customer complaining behahiour, Consumer and Industrial Buying Behaviour. Dholakia, R.R. and Uusitalo. 2002. Switching to electronic stores: consumer characteristics and the perception of shopping benefits. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management,30(10): 459-469. Dotchin, J. A and J.S. Oaklan, (1994). Total quality management in services: Part 2 service quality, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 11(3), pp 180 190 Etzel, M., B. Walker, & W. Stanton. (1997). Marketing, 11 Irwin/McGraw Hill
th

Edition.

Roger Blackwell, Paul Minard, and James Engel (1990), Consumer Behavior. South-Western College Publishing. Roger Blackwell, Paul Minard, and James Engel (2000), Consumer Behavior. SouthWestern College Publishing; J. Hammond, R. Keeney, and H. Raffia (1999), Smart Choices. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA; Newell, A.

Fecikova, I., (2004), An Index Method for Measurement of customer satisfaction, The TQM Magazine, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 57-66. Fornell , C. and Wernerfelt, B. (1987). Defensive marketing strategy by customer compliant management; a theoretical analysis. Jurnal of Markting Research, 24 (November) pp. 337-346 Gerson R. F. (1993). Measuring customer satisfaction: A guide to managing quality service, Crisp Publications, Menlo Park. Grasse, W., (1999). The reality of brands: Towards an ontology of marketing. American Journal of economics and sociology Griffin. (2000). Fundamentals of management. 2 Company
nd

Edition, Houghton Miffin

Grost, J., Ganfi, & W. Wallance. (1998). providing customer satisfaction. Journal of Total Quality Management Gronroos, C., (1984). A service quality model and its marketing implications. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24(Winter), pp 36 44 Iacobucci D., Grayson K.A. and Ostrom A.L. 1994. The calculus of service quality and customer satisfaction: theoretical and empirical differentiation and integration. In T.A. Swartz, D.E. Bowen and S.W. Brown (eds.), Advances in Services Marketing and Management, 3, 167, JAI Press Inc. Greenwich, CT. Ishikawa, Kaoru (1990). Introduction to quality control. J. H. Loftus (trans.). Tokyo Jacoby, Jacob, Jerry C. Olson and Rafael A. Haddock (1973), Price, Brand Name and Product Composition Characteristics as Determinants of Perceived Quality, Journal of Applied Psychology, 55 (no. 6), pp 570579 Janiszewski, C. (2009). The consumer experiences. Association for consumer research . University of florida. Johnson, M. D., Gustafsson, A., Andreassen, T. W., Lervik, L. and Cha, J. (2001), The evolution and future of national customer satisfaction index models, Journal of Economic Psychology 22, 217-245. Jose, M. M Bloemer, & Hans D.P. Kesper. (1994). The complex relationship between consumer satisfaction and brand loyalty. Journal of economics psychology

Kanji, G. and Moura, P. (2002) Kanjis business scorecard, Total Quality Management, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 13-27. Kang G. and James J, (2004), Service quality dimensions: an examination of gronrooss service quality model. Emerald research vol. 14 (4), pp. 266-277. Keith R. (1960). The marketing revolution. Journal of Marketing Kenesei, Z. and Todd, S. (2004), The use of price in the purchase decision. Journal of Empirical Generalization in Marketing Science. 8. pp. 1-21. Keller, K.L. (2008) Strategic brand management: building, measuring and managing brand equity. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

Keller, K.L, (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring and managing customer based brand equity. Journal of Marketing. Vol. 57, January, pp. 1-22 Khanh, V, La & J. Kandampully, (2002), Electronic retailing and distribution service; cyber intermediaries that serve customers and service provider

Kotler, P. (1997). Marketing Management, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Kotler, P. (1991). Marketing Management. Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Kotler, P& Clarke (1987) Marketing Management; Analysis and practices, Prentice Hall, Eaglewood Clifffs, NJ. Kwan, C.Y., Yeung, K.W. and Au, K.F. (2004), Decision making behavior toward casual wear buying: a study of young consumers in mainland chine, Journal of management & world business research, Vol. 1 No. 1. LaTour, S. A. and N. C. Peat Conceptual and methodological issues in consumer satisfaction research, in: W. L. Wilkie (ed.), Advances in consumer Research, Association for Consumer Research, 1979, pp. 432-437. Lewis, Robert C. and Bernard H. Booms (1983), The marketing aspects of service quality, in Emerging Perspectives on Services Marketing, Lewis, B.R. and V.W. Mitchell, (1990). Defining and measuring the quality of customer service, Journal of Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 8(6), pp 278 291

Mackoy, Robert D., Richard A. Spreng and Gilbert D. Harrell (1996), "An investigation of the relationship between level of satisfaction and processing intensity," Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, Vol. 9, 75-80. McKinney, V., Yoon, K. & Zahedi, F.M. (2002). The measurement of web customer satisfaction: An expectation and disconfirmation approach, Information System research, 13 (3 September) Mc Kennedy, J., & U. Scheider (2000). Measuring customer satisfaction: why what and how. Journal of total quality management Monroe, Kent B. (1973), "Buyers' subjective perceptions of price," Journal of Marketing Research, 10(May), 70-80. Mowen, John C. and Michael S. Minor (2001), Consumer behavior: A framework. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Neilsen, J. (2000). Designing web usability. Indianapolis. Newyork. McGraw Hill Nicholas, B. (2008). Electronic Ticketing: Electronic Business Course: Fribourg. Project Paper, pp. 18-19 Oliver R.L. (1980). A cognitive model of antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17 (4 November), 469-9 Oliver R.L. (1981). Measurement and evaluation of satisfaction decision. Journal of retailing, 57(3), 25-49 Oliver R.L. & DeSarbo, W.S. (1988). Response determinant in satisfaction judgment. Journal of consumer research 14 149-507 Oliver, Richard L., Roland T. Rust, Sejeev Varki. (1997). Customer delight: foundation, finding, and managerial insight. Journal or Retailing. 73 (fall), 311-336 Onwuchuruba, G. U, (2002), Marketing Financial Services in Nigeria, Lagos: Servo Marketing and Management Services, Parasuraman A. Zeithaml, V. A. & Berry L.L., (1985) A conceptual model of service quality and its implication for future research. Journal of marketing, 49 (Fall) 41-50

Parasuraman A. Zeithaml, V. A. & Berry L.L., (1984) Alternative scales for measuring service quality: comparative assessment psychometric and diagnostic criteria. Journal of retailing, 70 (3), 30-201 Parker, C. and Mathews, B.P. (2001) Customer satisfaction: contrasting academic and consumers interpretations, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, volume 19, number 1, pp. 38-44. Pine, B.J. and Gilmore, J.H. (1999) The experience of economy Harvard Business Review Rayport, J.F. and B.J. Jaworski (2001), Introduction McGraw- Hill, New York, NY. to E-Commerce,

Reicheld, F.F & P. Schefter. (2000). E-loyalty your secret weapon on the web. Harvard Business Review Saddle River, New Jersey, 07458; Pearson Education International Prentice Hall Santoso, Singgih, (2004). SPSS Statistik Parametik. Jakarta; PT. Elex Media Komputindo Scott CA. The effects of trial and incentives on repeat purchase behavior. J Mark Res 1976; 13(3):263 70 [August] Schneider B. and Bowen D. (1999), Understanding customer delight and outrage Sloan management review, Fall. Schindler (1989). The excitement of getting a bargain: some hypotheses concerning the origins and effects of smart-shopper feelings. Adv Consume Res 6:447 53. Sekaran, U (2006) Research Methods for business. A skill building approach Sharon Didier. (2003) The marketing function and customer satisfaction online Spreng, R., S. Mechenzie, H. olshavsky. (1996). Re-examination determinant of customer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing of

Sproles, G.B. (1985), From perfectionism to fadism: measuring consumers' decision-making styles, American Council on Consumer Interests, pp. 79-85.

Strahilevitz MA, Myers JG. Donations to charity as purchase incen- tives: how well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell. J Consum Res 1998;24(4):43446 [March]. Solomon, M. R. (2004). Customer behavior buying, having and being (6 Ed.) Upper
th

Takeuchi, Hirotaka and John A. Quelch (1983), Quality Is More Than Making a Good Product, Harvard Business Review, 61 (July-August), pp 139145 Tortrakul Yomnak. (2007). Perception of service quality and customer satisfaction of online shopping services. Veloutsou, C., Gilbert, R.G., Moutinho, L.A. and Good, M.M. (2005), Measuring transactionspecific satisfaction in services, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 39 No. 5-6, pp. 606-28. Voltair, (2003). Customer service and satisfaction, Chapter1. pp.18 Westbrook, R.A. (1987). Product/Consumption-Based Affective Responses and Post purchase process. Journal of Marketing Research, 24 (August), pp.786-794 Westbrook, R.A. and Oliver, R.L. (1991). The dimensionality of consumption emotion pattern and customer satisfaction. Journal of consumer research , 18 (June), pp.84-91. Wisniewski, M and M. Donnelly (1996). Measuring service quality in public sector: the potential for SERVQUAL. Journal of Total Quality Management, 7(4), pp 357-356 Yang, Z., Jun, M. (2002). Consumer perception of e-service quality: from internet purchaser and non purchaser perspective. Journal of Business Strategies, 19(1), 19-41 Yang, Z., Jun, M. & Peterson, R.T. (2004) Measuring customer perceive online service quality: scale development and managerial implication. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(11), 1149-1174. Yang, z., Peterson, R.T. & Cai, S. (2003). Service quality dimension of internet retailing: an explanatory analysis. Journal of Service Marketing, 17(6/7), 685-700

Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A. & Malhotra, A (2000). A conceptual framework for understanding e-service quality: implication for future research and managerial practices. Working paper, report no. 00-115. Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA. Website : http ://marketingtea cher.com/Lesso ns/lesson_promotion.ht m http ://www.indo nesialogue.com http ://www.wikipedia.com/promo tion www.en.wikipedia.o rg/wiki/Customer_experiences

APPENDIX I QUESTIONNAIRE

MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH JAKARTA

ONLINE QUESTIONNAIRE

Dear Sir or madam First of all, I would like to wish congratulation because you have been chosen as a respondent in this study. I am conducting a study about Factors Affecting Customer Satisfaction in Purchase Decision on Ticket Online: Case study In Air Asia. This research is being conducted as a partial fulfillment to Bachelor of Degree in Economics Program. This questionnaire consist of two section, section A and B consist question about your demographic profile, section two is about promotion, service quality, customer expectation and brand. All responses will be kept animus. All information is treated as PRIVATELY and CONFIDENTIAL and only used for the academic research purpose Furthermore, your honesty and great sincerity are highly required in answering the questionnaire. Your cooperation in this degree project is greatly appreciated. Thank you for your valuable time

Sincerel y Budi Kurniawan Faculty of Economics and Social Science State Islamic University S yarif Hidayatullah Jakarta 2010

Section A Personal Background Please tick your answer in the blank given. Chose only one and your original response is very much appreciated I Used Air Asia Airline Before Ever Gender level Male Age level < 20 Education level Diploma Never

Female

21 25

25 30

30 35

> 35

Degree

Master

Phd

Other

Number of Booking Ticket In one year <1 College UUM IIUM USM UTM UM 2-4 5-7 >7

Section B Variable Measurement Please read description given. Then rate the frequency by tick the corresponding next to the statement. Use the following scale:

1 = Strongly Dissatisfied 2 = Dissatisfied 3 = Somehow Satisfied 4 = Satisfied 5 = Strongly Satisfied

(Strongly Disagree) (Disagree) Neutral (Agree) (Strongly Agree)

Promotion Impact to Online Booking Ticket

1. AirAsias promotion Impact my purchase decision and my satisfaction [1] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] [4] [5] 2. I think promotion with advertisement is very informative and influence my satisfaction [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

3. Personal Selling influence my satisfaction easy than other. [ 1 ] [5] 4. Launching Program impact my satisfaction and interesting me to buy ticket online [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [2] [3] [4]

5. Radio and television Influence my satisfaction [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

6. Sales promotion make me deep understand and affect my customer satisfaction [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

Service Quality Impact Online Booking Ticket 7. Service Quality is impact my purchase decision in booking ticket and my satisfaction [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

8. Air Asias facilities, equipment, personnel, and communication materials are visible. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

9. Knowledge and courtesy of employees and their ability to convey my trust and confidence. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

10. Air Asia able to perform the promised service dependably and accurately. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [3] [4] [5]

11. Air Asias crew or employee willingness to help customers and provide prompt service. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

12. The firm provides care and individualized attention to the customers. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [3] [4] [5]

Customer Expectation Impact my booking online 1. My expectation is impact satisfaction in booking ticket [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

2. Schedule stated in my ticket is manage and on the time. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

3. I feel safety and not worried with my flight [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

4. I feel comfortable and believe to the crew or employee serve me with better service [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

5. Flight with the low fare influence my travel [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

6. I enjoy with procedures and not complicated when I book ticket online [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

Brand Impact Online Booking Ticket 7. My decision to booking ticket via online depend on my knowledge of the brand being offered and affect brand affect my satisfaction [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

8. Brand Image play an important role in my decision to booking ticket online [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

9. I aware, If someone asked me about Airlines, I will ask him or her to purchase Air Asias Ticket. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

Thank You

APPENDIX II OUTPUT OF SPSS 17.0 ANALYSIS

Appendix II (4.1)
Gender Cumulative Percent 35.5 100.0

Valid

male female Total

Frequency 71 129 200

Percent 35.5 64.5 100.0

Valid Percent 35.5 64.5 100.0

Appendix II (4.2)
Age Level Cumulative Percent 49.5 92.0 97.5 100.0

Valid

<20 21-25 26-30 >30 Total

Frequency 99 85 11 5 200

Percent 49.5 42.5 5.5 2.5 100.0

Valid Percent 49.5 42.5 5.5 2.5 100.0

Appendix II (4.3)
Education Level Cumulative Percent 91.0 96.5 100.0

Valid

Degree Master Doctoral Total

Frequency 182 11 7 200

Percent 91.0 5.5 3.5 100.0

Valid Percent 91.0 5.5 3.5 100.0

Appendix II (4.4)
Number Of Purchase Cumulative Percent 6.0 90.5 100.0

Valid

<1 2-4 5-7 Total

Frequency 12 169 19 200

Percent 6.0 84.5 9.5 100.0

Valid Percent 6.0 84.5 9.5 100.0

Appendix II (4.5)
Colleges of Respondent Cumulative Percent 29.0 49.0 61.0 78.0 100.0

Valid

UUM IIUM USM UTM UM Total

Frequency 58 40 24 34 44 200

Percent 29.0 20.0 12.0 17.0 22.0 100.0

Valid Percent 29.0 20.0 12.0 17.0 22.0 100.0

Appendix II (4.6)
Item-Total Statistics Scale Variance if Item Deleted 86.740 89.471 89.752 86.731 87.752 87.651 85.826 86.464 87.609 87.448 86.671 87.679 88.892 87.679 88.378 85.523 87.707 85.926 92.133 88.892 88.028 Corrected Item-Total Correlation .498 .473 .522 .472 .399 .461 .488 .499 .488 .550 .511 .478 .461 .478 .465 .577 .523 .570 .507 .471 .617 Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted .882 .883 .882 .883 .886 .883 .883 .882 .882 .881 .882 .883 .883 .883 .883 .880 .881 .880 .884 .883 .880

Promotion Advertising Personal Selling 1 Personal Selling 2 Publicity Sales Promotion Service Quality Tangiable Assurance Reliability Responsiveness Empaty Expectation Schedule Managed Safety Better Service Cheaper Airfare Easy Booking Brand Brand Image Brand Awareness

Scale Mean if Item Deleted 70.13 70.33 70.20 70.40 70.20 70.93 70.97 70.87 70.67 71.00 70.87 70.90 70.93 71.10 70.63 70.83 70.50 70.93 70.07 70.07 70.80

Appendix II (4.7)
Promotion Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha .618

N of Items 5

Service Quality Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha .797

N of Items 5

Customer Expectation Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha .714

N of Items 5

Brand Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha .416

N of Items 2

Appendix II (4.8)
Advertising Cumulative Percent 1.5 6.5 43.5 100.0

Valid

Dissagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Total

Frequency 3 10 74 113 200

Percent 1.5 5.0 37.0 56.5 100.0

Valid Percent 1.5 5.0 37.0 56.5 100.0

Personal Selling 1 Cumulative Percent 1.0 9.0 64.5 100.0

Frequency Valid Dissagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Total 2 16 111 71 200

Percent 1.0 8.0 55.5 35.5 100.0

Valid Percent 1.0 8.0 55.5 35.5 100.0

Personal Selling 2 Cumulative Percent 1.5 14.5 59.5 100.0

Valid

Dissagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Total

Frequency 3 26 90 81 200

Percent 1.5 13.0 45.0 40.5 100.0 Publicity

Valid Percent 1.5 13.0 45.0 40.5 100.0

Frequency Valid Dissagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Total 5 23 98 74 200

Percent 2.5 11.5 49.0 37.0 100.0

Valid Percent 2.5 11.5 49.0 37.0 100.0

Cumulative Percent 2.5 14.0 63.0 100.0

Sales Promotion Cumulative Percent 45.0 57.5 83.0 100.0

Frequency Valid Dissagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Total 90 25 51 34 200

Percent 45.0 12.5 25.5 17.0 100.0

Valid Percent 45.0 12.5 25.5 17.0 100.0

Appendix II (4.9)
Tangible Cumulative Percent 1.5 27.0 45.5 91.5 100.0

Valid

Strongly Dissagree Dissagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Total

Frequency 3 51 37 92 17 200

Percent 1.5 25.5 18.5 46.0 8.5 100.0

Valid Percent 1.5 25.5 18.5 46.0 8.5 100.0

Assurance Cumulative Percent 20.5 38.0 77.0 100.0

Frequency Valid Dissagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Total 41 35 78 46 200

Percent 20.5 17.5 39.0 23.0 100.0

Valid Percent 20.5 17.5 39.0 23.0 100.0

Reliability Cumulative Percent 24.0 43.5 69.5 100.0

Valid

Dissagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Total

Frequency 48 39 52 61 200

Percent 24.0 19.5 26.0 30.5 100.0

Valid Percent 24.0 19.5 26.0 30.5 100.0

Responsiveness Cumulative Percent .5 23.0 39.5 80.5 100.0

Frequency Valid Strongly Dissagree Dissagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Total 1 45 33 82 39 200

Percent .5 22.5 16.5 41.0 19.5 100.0

Valid Percent .5 22.5 16.5 41.0 19.5 100.0

Empaty Cumulative Percent 1.5 28.0 51.5 92.5 100.0

Valid

Strongly Dissagree Dissagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Total

Frequency 3 53 47 82 15 200

Percent 1.5 26.5 23.5 41.0 7.5 100.0

Valid Percent 1.5 26.5 23.5 41.0 7.5 100.0

Appendix II (4.10)
Schedule Managed Cumulative Percent 35.0 51.5 86.0 100.0

Valid

Dissagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Total

Frequency 70 33 69 28 200

Percent 35.0 16.5 34.5 14.0 100.0 Safety

Valid Percent 35.0 16.5 34.5 14.0 100.0

Valid

Strongly Dissagree Dissagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Total

Frequency 1 70 58 58 13 200

Percent .5 35.0 29.0 29.0 6.5 100.0

Valid Percent .5 35.0 29.0 29.0 6.5 100.0

Cumulative Percent .5 35.5 64.5 93.5 100.0

Better Service Cumulative Percent 5.5 22.5 64.0 100.0

Frequency Valid Dissagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Total 11 34 83 72 200

Percent 5.5 17.0 41.5 36.0 100.0

Valid Percent 5.5 17.0 41.5 36.0 100.0

Cheaper Airfare Cumulative Percent 2.5 23.0 54.0 100.0

Valid

Dissagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Total

Frequency 5 41 62 92 200

Percent 2.5 20.5 31.0 46.0 100.0

Valid Percent 2.5 20.5 31.0 46.0 100.0

Easy Booking Cumulative Percent 6.0 18.0 64.0 100.0

Valid

Dissagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Total

Frequency 12 24 92 72 200

Percent 6.0 12.0 46.0 36.0 100.0

Valid Percent 6.0 12.0 46.0 36.0 100.0

Appendix II (4.11)
Brand Image Cumulative Percent 2.0 24.0 80.0 100.0

Frequency Valid Dissagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Total 4 44 112 40 200

Percent 2.0 22.0 56.0 20.0 100.0

Valid Percent 2.0 22.0 56.0 20.0 100.0

Brand Awareness Cumulative Percent 3.5 43.5 92.5 100.0

Frequency Valid Dissagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Total 7 80 98 15 200

Percent 3.5 40.0 49.0 7.5 100.0

Valid Percent 3.5 40.0 49.0 7.5 100.0

Appendix II (4.12)
Promotion Cumulative Percent .5 1.5 6.5 48.0 100.0

Valid

Strongly Dissagree Dissagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Total

Frequency 1 2 10 83 104 200

Percent .5 1.0 5.0 41.5 52.0 100.0

Valid Percent .5 1.0 5.0 41.5 52.0 100.0

Service Quality Cumulative Percent 25.5 64.0 89.0 100.0

Frequency Valid Dissagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Total 51 77 50 22 200

Percent 25.5 38.5 25.0 11.0 100.0

Valid Percent 25.5 38.5 25.0 11.0 100.0

Expectation Cumulative Percent 5.0 52.0 89.0 100.0

Valid

Dissagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Total

Frequency 10 94 74 22 200

Percent 5.0 47.0 37.0 11.0 100.0

Valid Percent 5.0 47.0 37.0 11.0 100.0

Brand Cumulative Percent 1.5 7.0 20.0 63.5 100.0

Frequency Valid Strongly Dissagree Dissagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Total 3 11 26 87 73 200

Percent 1.5 5.5 13.0 43.5 36.5 100.0

Valid Percent 1.5 5.5 13.0 43.5 36.5 100.0

Appendix II (4.14)
Correlations Customer Satisfaction 1 . 200 .448(**) .000 200 .677(**) .000 200 .535(**) .000 200 .442(**) .000 Service Quality .677(**) .000 200 .103 .074 200 1 . 200 .222(**) .001 200 .003 .482

Customer Satisfaction Promotion

Pearson Correlation Sig. (1-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (1-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (1-tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (1-tailed) N

Promotion .448(**) .000 200 1 . 200 .103 .074 200 .117(*) .050 200 -.087 .109

Expectation .535(**) .000 200 .117(*) .050 200 .222(**) .001 200 1 . 200 -.113 .056 200

Brand .442(**) .000 200 -.087 .109 200 .003 .482 200 -.113 .056 200 1 . 200

Service Quality Expectation

Brand

Pearson Correlation Sig. (1-tailed) N

200 200 200 ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed). * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (1-tailed).

Appendix II (4.15)
ANOVA(Multiple) Sum of Squares Regressio n Residual 28.250

Model 3

Df 3

Mean Square 9.417

F 178.522

Sig. .000(c)

10.339 196 .053 Total 38.589 199 d Predictors: (Constant), Promotion, Service Quality, Expectation, e Dependent Variable: Customer Satisfaction

Coefficients(a) Unstandardized Coefficients Model 3 (Constant) Promotion B 1.229 .224 Std. Error .129 .024 Standardized Coefficients Beta .348 .558 .371 t 9.557 9.308 14.680 9.728 Sig. .000 .000 .000 .000

a.

Service .259 .018 Quality Expectation .216 .022 Dependent Variable: Customer Satisfaction ANOVA(b) Sum of Squares Regressio n Residual Total 7.755 30.834

Model 1

Df 1 198

Mean Square 7.755 .156

F 49.798

Sig. .000(a)

38.589 199 a Predictors: (Constant), Promotion b Dependent Variable: Customer Satisfaction ANOVA(b) Sum of Squares Regressio n Residual Total 17.663 20.926

Model 1

Df 1 198

Mean Square 17.663 .106

F 167.131

Sig. .000(a)

38.589 199 a Predictors: (Constant), Service Quality b Dependent Variable: Customer Satisfaction

ANOVA(b) Sum of Squares Regressio n Residual Total 11.061 27.528

Model 1

Df 1 198

Mean Square 11.061 .139

F 79.559

Sig. .000(a)

38.589 199 a Predictors: (Constant), Expectation b Dependent Variable: Customer Satisfaction ANOVA(b) Sum of Squares Regressio n Residual Total 7.541

Model 1

Df 1

Mean Square 7.541 .157

F 48.092

Sig. .000(a)

31.048 198 38.589 199 a Predictors: (Constant), Brand b Dependent Variable: Customer Satisfaction