BSC - PS - 3 26 13

PROCEDURAL STANDARDS FOR WHOLE BUILDING SYSTEMS TECHNICAL COMMISSIONING
FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION
2013 FOURTH EDITION
National Environmental Balancing Bureau

8575 Grovemont Circle
Gaithersburg, Maryland 20877-4121 301-977-3698 301-977-9589 FAX www.nebb.org
PROCEDURAL STANDARDS FOR WHOLE BUILDING SYSTEMS COMMISSIONING

FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION
Copyright NEBB, 2013 FIRST EDITION - JANUARY 1993 SECOND EDITION - JANUARY 2000 THIRD EDITION - JULY 2008 FOURTH EDITION April 2013
NEBB D E V E L O P S A N D SPECIFIES S T A N D A R D S F O R COMMISSIONING O F W H O L E B U I L D I N G SYSTEMS. PERFORMANCE OF THESE SERVICES ONLY BY PERSONS CERTIFIED OR QUALIFIED FOR ENGAGING IN THIS SPECIALTY IS ONE SUCH STANDARD. NEBB SOLICITS INQUIRY BY ANY AND ALL PERSONS SEEKING SUCH APPROVALS. FOR MORE INFORMATION, GO TO WWW.NEBB.ORG.
This book may not be reproduced in any form without written permission of the copyright owner.
These Procedural Standards were developed using reliable engineering principles and research plus consultation with, and information obtained from, manufacturers, users, testing laboratories and others having specialized experience. They are subject to revision as further experience and investigation may show it necessary or desirable to do so. Building Systems Commissioning completed to these standards may not be applicable if the system being commissioned contains features or components impairing the results of these standards. The National Environmental Balancing Bureau assumes no responsibility and has no liability for the application of the principles or techniques contained in these Procedural Standards. Authorities considering adoption of these Procedural Standards should review all Federal, State, local and contract regulations applicable to the specific installation.
ii
FOREWORD
The purpose of the NEBB Procedural Standards for Whole Building Systems Commissioning for New Construction is to establish a uniform and systematic set of criteria for the performance of the technical commissioning process when applied to new building systems such as mechanical, electrical and building envelope systems. These Procedural Standards are intended as the baseline requirements a NEBB BSC Certified Firm follows when performing NEBB Technical Building Systems Commissioning (BSC). Contract document requirements or contractual agreements between the Owner and the NEBB BSC Certified Firm may supersede the NEBB requirements. This manual describes the standard of care for all baseline activities performed during the BSC process. The purpose of these Procedural Standards is to provide specific requirements each firm performing NEBB Certified BSC must meet at each Phase of the BSC process. These Procedural Standards are divided into three distinct Parts: Standards, Process, and Procedures. The Standards, Process and Procedures sections are narrative and describe the baseline level of technical processes which all NEBB Certified projects follow to be a NEBB Project. This 4th edition details the requirements for Whole Building Systems Commissioning and includes HVAC, Building Envelope, Electrical, Special Electrical, Plumbing and Fire Protection Systems as the baseline standard of care. The Scope of Work identifies all systems to be included in Commissioning as part of the Technical BSC process.
Part 1 STANDARDS
The Standards cover requirements for quality control, quality compliance, instrumentation requirements, and report requirements.
Part 2 PROCESS
The Process section is devoted to providing a detailed explanation of the NEBB Technical Commissioning approach.
Part 3 PROCEDURES
The Procedures section covers the technical procedures for commissioning of new buildings and their systems.
BUILDING SYSTEMS COMMISSIONING COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND OTHER CONTRIBUTORS FOR CURRENT EDITION
BSC Committee James Bochat Chairman Commissioning Concepts Phoenix, AZ Jon Sheppard Past Chairman Atlantic Testing & Balancing, Inc. Chesapeake, VA Vincent P. Lopez The Ballinger Company Philadelphia, PA Richard Farrington HDR Inc. Tacoma, WA Dave McFarlane Atkins Global Fort Myers, FL Terry Townsend, P.E. Townsend Engineering, Inc. Chattanooga, TN Stephen Wiggins Newcomb & Boyd Atlanta, GA
BSC Task Force Team Members Vincent P. Lopez-Task Force Lead Brooks + Wright Commissioning Philadelphia, PA Richard Farrington HDR Inc. Tacoma, WA William Wright Brooks + Wright Commissioning Philadelphia, PA Terry Townsend, P.E. Townsend Engineering, Inc. Chattanooga, TN Elana Noel NEBB Gaithersburg, MD
NEBB BSC PROCEDURAL STANDARD
CONTENTS
SECTION 1 QUALITY CONFORMANCE............................................................................................. 3 CONFORMANCE CERTIFICATION................................................................................................. 3 1.1. 1.2. 1.3. 1.4. 1.5. 1.6. 1.7. 1.8. 1.9. 1.11 Program Advantages ......................................................................................................... 3 NEBB Quality Assurance Program Certificate............................................................. 3 Quality Control and Compliance ........................................................................................ 3 Cx Work Compliance ......................................................................................................... 3 CP Responsibilities............................................................................................................. 4 Execution of Procedures .................................................................................................... 4 Instrument and Equipment Use and Maintenance............................................................... 4 Coordination / Supervision ................................................................................................. 5 Project Communication ...................................................................................................... 5 Compilation and Submission of Final Commissioning Reports........................................... 5
1.10 Work Completion ............................................................................................................... 5 SECTION 2 RESPONSIBILITIES......................................................................................................... 6 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 6 2.1. 2.2. 2.3. 2.4. Owner Responsibilities....................................................................................................... 6 Design Professionals Responsibilities................................................................................. 6 Contractor Responsibilities ................................................................................................ 7 NEBB BSC Certified Firm Responsibilities ......................................................................... 7
SECTION 3 STANDARDS FOR INSTRUMENTATION........................................................................ 9 MINIMUM INSTRUMENTATION ...................................................................................................... 9 3.1. 3.2. Range and Accuracy ......................................................................................................... 9 Special Instruments ......................................................................................................... 10
SECTION 4 STANDARDS FOR REPORTS....................................................................................... 11 COMMISSIONING REPORT.......................................................................................................... 11 4.1. Required Pages ............................................................................................................... 11 SECTION 5 THE TECHNICAL COMMISSIONING PROCESS............................................................ 14 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................ 14 DESIGN PHASE COMMISSIONING.............................................................................................. 15 5.1. 5.2. 5.3. 5.4. Design Phase Requirements............................................................................................ 15 Design Phase Activities.................................................................................................... 16 Design Phase Deliverables .............................................................................................. 19 Pre-Bid Meeting ............................................................................................................... 20

CONSTRUCTION PHASE COMMISSIONING ............................................................................... 20 5.5. 5.6. 5.7. 5.8. 5.9. 5.10 Construction Phase Requirements................................................................................... 20 Construction Phase Activities ........................................................................................... 21 Construction Phase Deliverables ..................................................................................... 25 Post Occupancy Phase Requirements.............................................................................. 26 Post-Occupancy Phase Activities..................................................................................... 26 Post-Occupancy Phase Deliverables ............................................................................... 28
POST OCCUPANCY PHASE COMMISSIONING........................................................................... 26
SECTION 6 COMMISSIONING OF HVAC SYSTEMS....................................................................... 29 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................ 29 6.1. 6.2. 6.3. DESIGN PHASE COMMISSIONING................................................................................ 29 CONSTRUCTION PHASE COMMISSIONING................................................................. 30 POST OCCUPANCY PHASE COMMISSIONING ............................................................ 32
SECTION 7 COMMISSIONING OF BUILDING ENVELOPE.............................................................. 33 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................ 33 7.1. 7.2. 7.3. DESIGN PHASE COMMISSIONING................................................................................ 33 CONSTRUCTION PHASE COMMISSIONING................................................................. 34 POST OCCUPANCY PHASE COMMISSIONING ............................................................ 35
SECTION 8 COMMISSIONING OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS........................................................... 36 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................ 36 8.1. 8.2. 8.3. DESIGN PHASE COMMISSIONING................................................................................ 36 CONSTRUCTION PHASE COMMISSIONING................................................................. 37 POST OCCUPANCY PHASE COMMISSIONING ............................................................ 38
SECTION 9 COMMISSIONING OF SPECIAL ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS ........................................39 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................ 39 9.1. 9.2. 9.3. DESIGN PHASE COMMISSIONING................................................................................ 39 CONSTRUCTION PHASE COMMISSIONING................................................................. 40 POST OCCUPANCY PHASE COMMISSIONING ............................................................ 43 COMMISSIONING OF PLUMBING SYSTEMS ......................................................... 44
SECTION 10 10.1 10.2 10.3
INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................ 44 DESIGN PHASE COMMISSIONING................................................................................ 44 CONSTRUCTION PHASE COMMISSIONING................................................................. 45 POST OCCUPANCY PHASE COMMISSIONING ............................................................ 46
SECTION 11 COMMISSIONING OF FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS .............................................. 47 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................ 47

11.1 11.2 11.3 DESIGN PHASE COMMISSIONING................................................................................47 CONSTRUCTION PHASE COMMISSIONING.................................................................48 POST OCCUPANCY PHASE COMMISSIONING ............................................................50
Appendices........................................................................................................................................52 Normative Appendix A - Acronyms .................................................................................................52 Normative Appendix B - Definitions................................................................................................53 Normative Appendix C - Instrumentation ........................................................................................62
NEBB BSC PROCEDURAL STANDARDS
SECTION 1 QUALITY CONTROL AND COMPLIANCE
SECTION 1 QUALITY CONFORMANCE

CONFORMANCE CERTIFICATION
NEBB credibility is built by maintaining integrity through high standards, quality programs, and demonstrated capabilities of its certified firms. The QAP provides NEBB customers with a single contact for prompt professional support in understanding issues that impede successful project completion and help in mediating differences between the NEBB customer and the NEBB professional. The NEBB Quality Assurance Program is described in detail in a separate publication, available at www.nebb.org.
1.1
Program Advantages
The NEBB Quality Assurance Program affords building owners, architects, engineers and other agents a reliable basis for specifying work within the various disciplines of NEBB. The program promotes proper execution of projects by ensuring compliance with NEBB standards and procedures.
1.2
NEBB Quality Assurance Program CERTIFICATE
The NEBB Certified Firm shall make application to the NEBB Office for a Certificate of Conformance Certification if specified in the contract documents. The NEBB Quality Assurance Program Conformance Certification is also available for any project.
1.3
Quality Control and Compliance
Building owners are entitled to a professional service by every NEBB Certified Firm on every project, whether the job is NEBB-specified or not. It is the responsibility of the NEBB Certified Firm and its NEBB Certified Professional to establish and maintain procedures and practices that will assure a consistent pattern of high quality work on all projects. This point cannot be overemphasized.
1.4
Cx Work Compliance
The scope of work shall be performed as specified in the contract documents or as agreed to between the NEBB Certified Firm and the Owner/Buyer. Each relevant or applicable item as identified in the scope of work by description, or by reference, shall be performed NEBB Certified Firm and recorded in the NEBB Final Report. Data presented in a NEBB report shall provide an accurate record of the system tests, measurements, data and information. a. In all cases, the processes followed, the commissioning activities, the requirements of each phase, and the testing results conform to the current edition of the NEBB Procedural Standards for Whole Building Systems Technical Commissioning for New Construction. b. R e f e r e n c e s to desired procedures include statements such as "the work will be performed in accordance to NEBB Standards." When specifications indicate the BSC work must be performed in accordance with NEBB standards, the BSC procedures will conform to the edition of the NEBB Procedural Standards for Whole Building Systems Technical Commissioning for New Construction current at the time of the contract and must be performed by a NEBB Certified Firm.
c. The NEBB BSC Certified Firm and the NEBB BSC Certified Professional are allowed to sign and stamp a commissioning report as a NEBB Certified Commissioning Report only when the procedures and requirements as identified in these Procedural Standards have been followed. d. A NEBB Certified Report consists of any single commissioning phase or any combination of phases described in these Procedural Standards as required by the Owner. To qualify as a NEBB Certified Report, each commissioned phase included in the report adheres to the requirements of the phase being commissioned. e. If a scope of work of the commissioning contract does not specifically delineate the commissioning processes then the project is required to meet all requirements for each phase commissioned to be a NEBB Certified Project. f. If a project scope of work of the commissioning contract requires a different level of commissioning than described by the Procedural Standards language, the procedural variance is clearly delineated in the project scope of work and listed on the commissioning report certification page to qualify as a NEBB Certified Report.
g. Any project that does not comply with the Procedural Standards requirements and does not clearly identify the specific procedural variances required by the commissioning contract on the certification page cannot be signed and stamped as a NEBB certified commissioning report. All references to NEBB, including NEBB logos, stamps, certifications, etc. must be removed from the report
1.5
CP Responsibilities
It is the responsibility of the NEBB CP to control the quality of the commissioning work. This means that the NEBB Certified Firm, through its NEBB CP, shall satisfy the contract obligations set defined in the contract documents or as agreed to with the Owner/Buyer.
1.6
Execution of Procedures
The NEBB CP shall have project responsibility, which includes authority to represent the NEBB Certified Firm. Examples of project responsibility may include labor decisions, negotiating change orders, committing to contract interpretations and implementing changes in job schedules. The NEBB CP has the responsibility to assure that the systems have been commissioned properly in accordance with these Procedural Standards and the contract scope of work to assure the accuracy of all data included in the final Commissioning Report. Factors such as training, instrument use, coordination / supervision, work instructions, and project communication play a critical role in achieving this requirement.
1.7
Instrument and Equipment Use and Maintenance
NEBB CPs shall possess knowledge and skill in the proper use and care of the equipment and instruments required to perform the associated tests required of the commissioning effort. This shall include a thorough understanding of the operating principles and use of equipment and instruments. Considerations for the delicate nature of many of the instruments typically used, as well as the adverse effects of dirt, shock, jarring movements and exceeding rated capacities, shall be addressed along with the proper methods for storing and transporting the instruments.
1.8
Coordination / Supervision
The NEBB CP is in responsible charge for directing commissioning team members/ technicians in performing the commissioning work.
1.9
Project Communication
The NEBB CP reports on progress made toward work completion, when required, as well as report and address problems if encountered. When a problem exists, the NEBB CP should notify the appropriate personnel. The NEBB CP may provide input as to the cause of the problem and recommend possible solutions. Deficiencies and problems should be reported in the Issues Log.
1.10 Work Completion

The NEBB CP determines when the commissioning work has been completed. Generally, the specified work is complete when all applicable systems, components and assemblies are properly commissioned, all testing results have been approved, all issues have been resolved and the final commissioning report is complete. Reasonable efforts within the extent of the commissioning process should be performed in an effort to achieve acceptable system performance. The final report may contain unresolved issues only when the owner/buyer has accepted the unresolved issue and has agreed on its exclusion as a requirement of project completion. If the owner refuses to accept an unresolved issue and its correction is in dispute with the contracting or design team or the owner fails to respond to the issue report after three documented attempts, such issues must be identified in the executive summary of the final commissioning report.
1.11 Compilation and Submission of Final Commissioning Reports

Reports shall include information and data to provide an accurate quantitative record of system measurements and information. Reports also shall include notes and comments, as appropriate, to provide the reviewer with additional details related to the results of the commissioning efforts for all equipment, systems and components that were included in the scope. Reports shall meet the criteria listed in the Procedural Standards. The certification page shall bear the stamp of the NEBB CP. The stamp on the certification page shall be signed as evidence that the NEBB CP has personally reviewed and accepted the report. Paper Certified Report: An ink stamp issued by NEBB with an original signature or ink signature stamp shall be applied to the certification page. The signature and date shall not obscure the Certified Professional's name or Certified Firm's number in the seal/stamp. Electronic Certified Report: An electronic version of the NEBB issued seal/stamp (digital representation) shall be applied to the certification page, along with an electronic version of the Certified Professional's signature. This allows the Certified Professional to affix a computer generated seal/stamp and an electronic signature to a document. Stamp Security: Certified Professionals shall take appropriate measures to ensure security of their ink stamp, electronic stamp, ink signature stamp, and electronic signature. The Certified Professional cannot claim his/her stamp and/or signature were applied to a Certified Report without his/her permission or knowledge. The security and use of ink stamp, electronic stamp, ink signature stamp, or electronic signature is the responsibility of the Certified Professional. The Certified Professional is directly responsible for any misuse of these items regardless whether he/she authorized their use.
SECTION 2 RESPONSIBILITIES
INTRODUCTION
Best practice dictates commissioning services are to be procured directly by the Owner and the contract for these services is between the Owner and the commissioning firm. Under this arrangement, the commissioning firm does not have a contractual relationship with any other members of the project delivery team. These Procedural Standards assumes the BSC firm is contracted directly to the Owner. When other contractual relationships exist, special language must be included in the contract to preclude any conflicts of interest and to maintain the proper testing validation. In order to maximize value and benefits from commissioning, it is important to understand the Owner, the design professionals, and the contractors have responsibilities affecting the outcome of the commissioning process.
2.1
Owner Responsibilities
a. Retain the services of the NEBB BSC Certified Firm and require the NEBB BSC Certified Firm be retained early in the commissioning process. This should happen at the beginning of the Design Phase. b. Identify the Owners Project Requirements (OPR) c. Verifies that all Issue Log open items are resolved d. Have final responsibility to enforce the contract obligations to correct any deficiencies, or accept any designed / constructed condition even if it doesnt meet the OPR e. Have final authority to determine when the project is complete and the OPR has been fulfilled f. Have final authority to accept the Final Report
It is recommended the Owner:
2.2
Design Professionals Responsibilities

a. Prepare a Basis of Design document responding directly to the Owners Project Requirements b. Incorporate the Basis of Design into a set of Contract Documents conveying the design intent and conforms to the OPR c. Provide Design Development and Contract Documents to the Commissioning Team for commissioning evaluation and comment d. Work in concert with the Commissioning Authority (CA) to maximize the testability, accessibility, maintainability and efficient operation of the project e. Work in concert with the CA so the Contract Documents define the level of commissioning effort required by the construction team and equipment vendors f. Specify the construction team members provide documentation in accordance with these Procedural Standards
It is recommended the design professionals:
g. Specify all technical system suppliers or installers provide access to hardware, software, or onsite technical support required to assist the commissioning effort. The hardware, software or the onsite technical support is provided to the commissioning team at no cost to the Owner, Testing Subcontractors or the NEBB BSC Certified Firm. h. Attend periodic commissioning meetings i. Attend appropriate training for facilities operations presented by the Commissioning Team
2.3
Contractor Responsibilities
a. Copies of contract document change orders, requests for information communications, meeting minutes and contract addenda as they are developed during the construction process All project submittals for systems and components included in the commissioning scope as they are approved or reviewed by the design team A project schedule which incorporates commissioning milestones and schedule provided by the commissioning authority (CA) This schedule must coordinate the work of other disciplines and provide adequate time in the construction process to allow each sub trade to properly install and test their specific equipment. The schedule must coordinate the work of other disciplines and provide adequate time in the construction process to allow each sub trade to properly install and test their specific equipment Notify the NEBB BSC Certified Firm of all schedule changes Manage and implement the construction process to ensure the building and its systems are constructed in accordance with the contract documents and are complete and operational Manage and implement the start-up process in accordance with manufacturers recommendations to ensure all systems and components of all building systems are installed correctly and operating correctly and are ready for functional testing Manage and implement all system testing and balancing in accordance with the contract documents Require any special tools, software or programming devices, or the instruction on their use required for start-up, testing, balancing, commissioning or operation of any technical system be provided by the manufacturer or installing contractor to the firm or individual providing those services free of any additional cost or fees The training sessions are by the responsible contractor as defined in the project specifications
The General Contractor, Subcontractors and their Vendors must provide:
b. c.
d. e. f.
g.
h. i.
j.
2.4
NEBB BSC Certified Firm Responsibilities

a. Follow the current NEBB Procedural Standards when performing the BSC work b. Chair commissioning meeting with designers and contractors to introduce and direct the commissioning process c. Review plans, specifications and submittal evaluations for conformance to the OPR and BOD for possible conflicts and deficiencies. Evaluate documents for the ability of systems to be operated, maintained, commissioned, tested, adjusted and balanced, and conforming to industry accepted practices. d. Create, utilize and manage the commissioning Issues Log to resolve all design and construction issues discovered during the commissioning process
The NEBB BSC Certified Firm must provide:
e. Attend on-site commissioning meetings as required to complete and coordinate the commissioning process f. Assist CM/GC in developing all commissioning schedules g. The responsibility for creating, administering, performing, and observing the various activities during the Pre-Functional Tests are outlined in the Commissioning Plan and can be performed by different members of the Commissioning Team during the Construction Phase based on the type of technical activity of the test. The party responsible to perform each task is defined in the Contract Documents and the Commissioning Plan. h. Develop and perform all functional performance tests (FPT) for all systems included in the scope of work i. Make recommendations to the Owner regarding the acceptance of all equipment and system tests j. Provide the Final Commissioning Report
NEBB PROCEDURAL STANDARDS
SECTION 3 STANDARD FOR INSTRUMENTATION AND CALIBRATION
SECTION 3 STANDARDS FOR INSTRUMENTATION

MINIMUM INSTRUMENTATION
A NEBB BSC Certified Firm uses a variety of instrumentation in performing the specified BSC procedures on a project. It is the responsibility of the NEBB BSC Certified Firm to use appropriate instrumentation meeting the requirements of the instrumentation table found in Normative Appendix C. Instrumentation used on a NEBB project must be in proper operating condition and must be used in accordance with the manufacturers recommendations. NEBB requires NEBB BSC Certified Firms own the specified instrumentation. Normative Appendix C lists the minimum instrumentation a NEBB BSC Certified Firm must own. The NEBB BSC Certified Firms must maintain the instruments and have the instruments calibrated in accordance with the calibration requirements of Normative Appendix C. The required instruments and equipment listed in Normative Appendix C may be the same equipment and instruments utilized for TAB, S, V, FHT, BET, RCx and / or CPT certification. A separate set of instruments is not required.
3.1
Range and Accuracy
A NEBB BSC Certified Firm must possess instruments for each function and range listed in Normative Appendix C. Each instrument must have been specifically designed to meet the criteria (Minimum Accuracy, Range, and Resolution) of the function. Instrumentation with multiple capabilities can be accepted for more than one function when submitting documentation for a firms certification. However each separate function must meet NEBB requirements. Information and data regarding accuracy of all submitted instrumentation for the stated functions must be available from the manufacturer to show compliance with these requirements. The accuracy and range as reported by the instrument manufacturer must be verified by a testing laboratory which uses methods and equipment traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology or equivalent institute in countries other than the United States. Calibration requirements for each function are specified and must be met. Some instruments such as U-tube manometers and inclined manometers may not require calibration. However, if a "mechanical / electrical" device is substituted or employed in place of these types of instruments, the indicated calibration requirements noted apply. Certified Firms calibrate all instrumentation used by the firm on BSC projects in accordance with Normative Appendix C. Certified Professionals must understand the importance of using accurate instrumentation in the field, and must be prepared to show proof of instrumentation calibration for any instrument used in the execution of a NEBB certified commissioning project. Instruments must be used in accordance with manufacturers recommendations. The most suitable instrument, or combination of instruments, should be employed for a particular measurement or reading.
SECTION 3 STANDARD FOR INSTRUMENTATION AND CALIBRATION
3.2
Special Instruments
A NEBB BSC Certified Professional may be required to utilize special instrumentation not included in Normative Appendix C. Special instrumentation may be provided by the BSC CP, or by the installing subcontractors, or by vendors. This instrumentation must be in good working condition and have proof of calibration within the last 12 months.
10
SECTION 4 STANDARD FOR REPORTS
SECTION 4 STANDARDS FOR REPORTS

COMMISSIONING REPORT
The NEBB Procedural Standards Technical Building Systems Commissioning establishes baseline requirements of a NEBB Certified BSC Report. The NEBB BSC Report is required to have: a. b. c. d. e. f. g. Report Title Page Report Certification Page Table of Contents Page Executive Summary Commissioning Plan, with all specified deliverables Owner documented acceptance of deliverables by Phase Test Instrument Page
4.1
Required Pages
The requirements for each NEBB Certified BSC Report are listed below:
4.1.1 Report Title Page

The report title page includes: a. b. c. d. The heading: Certified Technical Building Systems Commissioning Report Project Name / Project Address Owner Name / Address / Contact Numbers NEBB BSC Certified Firm Name / Address / Contact Numbers / Certification Number
4.1.2 Report Certification Page

The certification page bears the stamp of the NEBB BSC Certified Professional. The stamp on the certification page is signed as evidence the NEBB BSC Certified Professional has reviewed and accepted the report. The report certification page includes: a. b. c. d. e. Project Name Certifying NEBB BSC Professionals Name Firm Name; Certification Number; Certification Expiration Date Commissioning Scope performed to NEBB standards Certifying NEBB BSC Certified Professionals NEBB Stamp (signed and dated) and this exact verbiage: "THE DATA AND CONCLUSIONS PRESENTED IN THIS REPORT ARE A RECORD OF SYSTEM COMMISSIONING, PERFORMANCE TESTING, AND TRAINING VERIFICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEBB BUILDING SYSTEMS COMMISSIONING PROCEDURAL STANDARDS AND THE PROJECT REQUIREMENTS.
11
THE RESULTS SHOWN AND INFORMATION GIVEN IN THIS REPORT ARE CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE DUE TO THE SYSTEMS OPERATING PARAMETERS AT THE TIME THE SYSTEMS WERE TESTED. THE COMMISSIONING AUTHORITY MAKES NO CLAIMS OR WARRANTIES STATED OR IMPLIED CONCERNING THE CONTINUED PERFORMANCE, OPERATION OR SAFETY OF THE FACILITY PAST THE TEST DATE IF CONDITIONS CHANGE OR OPERATING PARAMETERS WERE CHANGED BY OTHERS.
4.1.3 Table of Contents Page

The Table of Contents serves as a guide to the organization of the BSC report.
4.1.4 Executive Summary / Remarks

A NEBB Certified BSC Report includes an executive summary. The executive summary includes an exact description of the project Commissioning Scope of Work as per the Commissioning Contract. Any specific required variances from the NEBB baseline requirements must be clearly defined. Scope of Work and variance deviation documentation: a. b. c. d. e. f. Refer to NEBB Procedural Standards for standard processes Refer to Commissioning Plan for specific processes Description of any process deviations used as detailed on the certification page Review of each unresolved issue Review of each issue that was resolved in a manner that may still affect future system performance or create future inoperability Review of each deferred system test to be performed in the future
4.1.5 Commissioning Plan

The final project Commissioning Plan includes Design Phase information, Construction Phase information and Post-Occupancy Phase information included in the commissioning scope. The Commissioning Plan includes: a. b. c. d. e. f. g. Identifies all of the commissioning activities Identifies the systems to be commissioned Identifies the various Commissioning Team members during each phase Defines the roles and responsibilities of each Commissioning Team member Creates the schedule of all commissioning activities during each phase Establishes documentation requirements Establishes communication and reporting procedures
4.1.6 Deliverables by Phase

These deliverables in the form of a phase report are required to be submitted to the owner for final acceptance during the progress of the project. Each phase report shall become a part of the final report. a. Design Phase Report Section b. Construction Phase Report Section c. Post-Occupancy Phase Report Section
12

Each deliverable is required to contain at a minimum: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Phase Summary Identification of the deliverable All documents created throughout Phase Date of the document Project name Summary of the content Proof of Owner acknowledgement
4.1.7 Test Instrument Page

A NEBB Certified BSC Report includes a Test Instrument page. The Test Instrument page includes: a. b. c. d. e. List of NEBB required instruments List of non NEBB required instruments utilized for the project Model number and Serial number of each instrument Calibration date of each instrument Copy of current calibration certificate for each instrument used
4.1.8 All Report Pages

All tested items or systems included in the NEBB Certified BSC Report are clearly identified with a unique designation. The method of identification may be unique numbers, mechanical plan identification or an appropriate narrative description. a. b. c. d. All pages contain the name of the project All pages are identified with a unique page number Each PFT or FPT form includes the name of the responsible person who gathered the data Date of verification
13
SECTION 5 TECHNICAL COMMISSIONING PROCESS
SECTION 5 THE TECHNICAL COMMISSIONING PROCESS

INTRODUCTION
The purpose of the NEBB Commissioning Process is to provide detailed requirements for the technical commissioning process phases and define the responsibilities and activities required during each phase. The NEBB Commissioning Process focuses on technical commissioning of the whole building and all of its systems to insure interaction between systems. Technical commissioning requires full system testing and verification as to functionality and performance. This Section describes the general commissioning requirements for a project and the later sections provide detailed requirements for that specific discipline. The NEBB BSC Certified Professional must possess the technical competence to evaluate and verify the OPR, the design, the installation and the performance of a project from the standpoint of testability, accessibility, maintainability and efficient operation. Commissioning should start at the Owners project inception and continue for the life of the building. Consequently, the concepts and phases discussed in this section and the technical commissioning sections that follow are intentionally segregated into the various phases because not all phases are included in every project. This may require a task from a previous phase needs to be performed during a subsequent phase. The actual scope of commissioning services to be provided is outlined in the SOW and contract between the Owner and the NEBB BSC Certified Firm. a. The owner is responsible for delineating the commissioning scope of work which will define what systems are commissioned and what phases are included in the commissioning effort. b. If a Scope of Work of the commissioning contract does not specifically delineate the commissioning processes, the project is required to meet all baseline activities for each phase commissioned to be a NEBB Certified Project. c. If a project Scope of Work of the commissioning contract requires a different level of commissioning than described by this standard, the procedural variance must be clearly delineated in the project Scope of Work and listed on the Commissioning Report Certification Page to qualify as a NEBB Certified Project d. Any project that does not comply with these requirements of this Procedural Standards and does not clearly identify the specific procedural variances required by the commissioning contract, the certification page cannot be signed and stamped as a NEBB Certified Commissioning Report. All references to NEBB, including NEBB logos, stamps, certifications, etc. must be removed from the report. The phases of commissioning are: Design Phase Construction Phase Post-Occupancy Phase
14
DESIGN PHASE COMMISSIONING

Design Phase commissioning is the process of evaluating each element of the design for conformance to the OPR as it relates to the systems ability to be commissioned, maintained, and to function as it relates to accepted industry best practices. The first step of this process is to develop and document the Owners Project Requirements (OPR). The second is to develop the Commissioning Plan. The purpose of Design Phase commissioning is to verify the design professionals incorporate the OPR into the Contract Documents. The design professionals prepare a document called the Basis of Design (BOD). This document identifies how the design professionals create a design conforming to the OPR. Many entities in the design and construction field utilize the terms Design Intent, Basis of Design, Design Criteria and others interchangeably. The NEBB BSC Program defines the meanings for these terms in Section 1 Definitions. The Design Intent is comprised of two documents; the OPR and the BOD.
5.1
Design Phase Requirements
5.1.1 Owner's Project Requirements (OPR)

The OPR is a compilation of the communication and documentation of the Owners goals, objectives, and expectations for the project. The OPR includes the specific requirements pertaining to the project. This is where the Owner states the goals for how the project is judged as a success. The OPR is also a communication tool for specific project requirements. While the objectives are highlevel goals, the requirements can be specific details for the project and could include such items as building performance, sustainability requirements, commissioning goals, production details, equipment manufacturers, required environmental criteria, anticipated utility/energy usage, maintenance features, etc. The OPR includes information on how the building will be operated, types of tenants, maintenance requirements, indoor air quality objectives, budgetary issues and other objectives of the Owner. The objectives are defined by their performance criteria. Objectives may include flexibility of space arrangements or occupancy, environmental conditions, etc. The Owner and the project programming team define and develop the Owners Project Requirements (OPR). Sophisticated building owners may be able to easily provide their OPR to the Commissioning Authority (CA). The CA must be capable of providing technical review and expertise to assist and guide the Owner in developing this document. The OPR should be focused on measurable "end results". The OPR is a dynamic document updated, refined and expanded at each step in the commissioning process based on Owner accepted changes.
5.1.2 Design Phase Commissioning Plan

The Commissioning Plan is the document that: a. b. c. d. e. f. Identifies all of the commissioning activities Identifies the systems to be commissioned Identifies the various Commissioning Team members during each Phase Defines the roles and responsibilities of each Commissioning Team member Creates the schedule of all commissioning activities during each Phase Establishes documentation requirements
15
g. Establishes communication and reporting procedures The Commissioning Plan, like the OPR, is updated at each step in the commissioning process to account for accepted changes. The CA creates the Preliminary Commissioning Plan and distribute to all members of the Commissioning Team.
5.1.3 Design Commissioning Team Members

The Commissioning Team should be comprised of the Owner/Owners representative, and the CA. Additionally, if the design professionals, Construction Manager/General Contractor, Program Manager, or specialty trade contractors are known at the time, a representative from those entities should also be included at appropriate times. The team members may change throughout the commissioning process, however, the entities and the organizational structure remains the same during all phases of project and the associated commissioning Phases. For example, during the Design Phase, the Owner may be represented by the actual building owner or representative. During the Construction Phase Functional Performance testing the Owner may be represented by the building maintenance personnel.
5.1.4 Design Commissioning Team Responsibilities

The Owner defines and develops the OPR. The CA may need to assist the Owner in developing the OPR. The Commissioning Team, the Owner and the CA, are responsible for working in unison to completely define the OPR. The CA is responsible for developing the Preliminary Commissioning Plan and is responsible for documenting commissioning-related communications among the Commissioning Team members.
5.1.5 Commissioning Authority (CA) Responsibility

Commissioning is a process that works most effectively when done in a cooperative team atmosphere. The CA generally has the primary responsibility to foster a sense of cooperation and focus on a common outcome. The CA is responsible to ensure all communications between design team members is a two-way process by creating effective methods to deliver comments, and soliciting and documenting responses from design team members.
5.2
a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k.
Design Phase Activities

Owners Project Requirements (OPR) is developed and reviewed Create Design Phase commissioning plan Create Design Phase Issues Log Facilitate the design kick-off meeting Design phase commissioning meetings Basis of Design (BOD)review Design Reviews Create commissioning specifications Define Owner training requirements Define System Manual requirements Schedule Design Phase Cx Activities
These activities are required to be documented and reported during the Design Phase:
16
NEBB BSC PROCEDURAL STANDARD 5.2.1 OPR Definition and Development
The Owner is ultimately responsible for creating the OPR while the CA documents and assists as needed in the creation of the OPR. The ability to determine the success or failure of the commissioning efforts in a project can be directly related to the accurate definition of the OPR. Development of an accurate OPR is the singular most important aspect in the commissioning effort. The development and definition of accurately stated requirements helps provide a successful project. Updating the OPR during Design Phase is usually performed by the Owner to incorporate any approved changes that may have been incorporated in the project.
5.2.2 Design Phase Commissioning Plan

Section 5.1.2 provides an overview of the elements of the Commissioning Plan. It is the benchmark used to identify the various activities within each Phase of the project. It also identifies the roles and responsibilities of all the Commissioning Team members during each of the project Phases. The CA is responsible for preparing the Commissioning Plan.
5.2.3 Design Phase Issues Log

The CA is responsible for creating the Issues Log during the Design Phase of the project. The Issue Log records all identified commissioning related issues by number and the responses, dates and authors of each issue and response.
5.2.4 Design Phase Kick-off Meeting

The CA conducts the Kick-off Meeting with the design team and the Owner. The purpose of the meeting is to establish the purpose and proposed process for commissioning the design and to review the Design Phase Commissioning Plan. a. b. c. d. e. f. g. Create the agenda Attend and lead the meeting Review the Design Phase Commissioning Plan with the Team Members Review the various commissioning activities and schedules for the design phase Review documentation requirements Review communication and reporting procedures for the design issue log Prepare and distribute meeting minutes
5.2.5 Commissioning Meetings

The CA is responsible to conduct, record, and distribute the minutes for all commissioning meetings for each project. The meetings are designed in an organized manner with a logical progression throughout the project. a. b. c. d. e. f. g. Create the agenda Attend and lead the meeting Review the Commissioning Plan with the team members Review the various commissioning activities and schedules Review documentation requirements Review communication and reporting procedures Prepare and distribute meeting minutes
5.2.6 BOD Design Team Review

The design professionals are responsible for preparing the BOD. The BOD has two components; the Design Narrative and the Design Criteria. The CA assists with the design team in documenting the Basis of Design created by the design team meets the requirements of the OPR.
17
The Design Narrative is a written description identifying the assumptions made by the design professionals in interpreting the OPR and the proposed design solutions implemented to satisfy the requirements of the OPR. The narrative should include a description of the systems, equipment, and components selected and why they were chosen. It should also include reasons other systems, equipment, and components were considered and rejected. Acceptance of the items in the Design Narrative should be the consensus of both the Owner and the design professionals. It is the responsibility of the CA to document this agreement. The Design Narrative documents the design professionals process and decisions made at the early stages of the project. The narrative serves as a Scope of Work for the design team in creating the Design Development documents. The Design Criteria is a listing of the project design parameters, including its source, and how it meets the OPR during the design of the project. The criteria may include but not limited to: a. b. c. d. e. f. Project location, special site requirements, and environmental criteria Design parameters and conditions Design assumptions and limitations Accepted safety factors to be used Accepted levels of redundancy Code review requirements, applicable standards, and other governmental agency regulations
These Design Criteria are used to produce the engineering calculations and Contract Documents.
5.2.7 Design Reviews

The CA is required to evaluate the contract documents at least once near 100% Construction Document level. The frequency of evaluation is as specified in the contract documents between the Owner and the NEBB BSC Certified Firm and may be at the 35%, 65% and 95% levels. The purpose for the CA to review the design is to evaluate the design for conformance to the OPR and verify the components, systems and assemblies in the design, directly relate to the estability, accessibility, maintainability, efficient operation and industry accepted best practices. Design Phase commissioning is the process of comparing each element of the design to the Owners Project Requirements (OPR). The NEBB Design Phase commissioning process is not intended to be a peer review of the design professionals work or responsibilities. These remain the responsibility of the design professional and the design team. Design Phase commissioning consists of: a. Assisting the design team ensuring the Basis of Design meets the requirements of the Owners Project Requirements b. Reviewing design development documents for Commissionability, maintainability, functionality and best practices i. Systems review. The CA reviews each system. ii. Component review. The CA reviews each component. c. Verifying the proposed system can be tested in a manner providing both valid repeatable tests and manageable baseline data for the operators of the systems d. The CA maintains a design phase commissioning issue log e. Design Phase commissioning report.
5.2.8 Commissioning Specifications

The CA should assist the design professionals in preparing the commissioning specifications for the contract documents. It is recommended the CA evaluate the contract documents to verify the proper contractual obligations related to the Construction Phase and the Post-Occupancy Phase Commissioning have been defined for all applicable project bid sections. The CA verifies the commissioning Scope of
18
Work for the contractors, vendors, specialty subcontractors, etc. is defined so contractors and vendors can quantify the commissioning requirements and their associated costs. The CA is to also verify the documents clearly define the type and method of testing and define the criteria used to determine compliance and acceptance.
5.2.9 Define Owner Training Requirements

The team of CA, Owner and the design professionals define the training requirements for the Owners personnel is in accordance with industry best practice, and ensure complete training occurs. The CA needs to verify the training requirements are incorporated into the final Contract Documents, and include these training requirements into the Commissioning Plan.
5.2.10 Define Systems Manual Requirements

During the Design Phase, the CA, Owner, and the design team determine which documents make up the Systems Manual. With minor variations depending on project requirements, a Final Systems Manual typically includes. Final Approved Submittals and Shop Drawings a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. Final OPR Final BOD Final Contract Documents Record Drawings (As-Built) Final O&M Manuals Final Commissioning Report Operator Training Materials Recommended Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) Testing Reports
5.2.11 Commissioning Activities Scheduled

The CA is to verify commissioning activities are incorporated into the Design Phase schedule.
5.3
Design Phase Deliverables
Documentation requirements prior to the Design Phase include: a. Phase summary contains: 1. List of Phase deliverables to Owner 2. Summary of each document included in deliverable 3. Unresolved issues from issues log 4. Potential impacts of unresolved issues 5. Signature line for Owner acceptance b. Each of these documents must contain: date of document, project name, summary of content. 1. The Contract Documents including the commissioning requirements for construction 2. Document review comments 3. The updated OPR 4. The updated Issues Log with noted corrections 5. The updated Commissioning Plan 6. The updated BOD from the design professionals 7. The Design Phase Commissioning Report
19
5.4
Pre-Bid Meeting
The CA may be required to attend and participate in the Pre-Bid meeting to fully explain the commissioning requirements of the Contract Documents. This is a valuable activity when contractors are not familiar with the commissioning process. This is an important meeting that helps the subcontractors better understand the level of involvement in the commissioning process. When contractors understand their involvement in the commissioning process it helps them to avoid over or underestimating the cost of subcontractor involvement in the commissioning process.
CONSTRUCTION PHASE COMMISSIONING

5.5 Construction Phase Requirements
The building shell is erected and the systems, components, and equipment are installed in the Construction Phase. The main focus of the commissioning efforts during the Construction Phase is: a. b. c. d. Conduct the Kick-off meeting and all other Commissioning Meetings Perform Site Observations (SO) Verify the Pre-Functional Tests (PFT) are performed and documented Perform Functional Performance Tests (FPT)
5.5.1 Commissioning Team Members

During the Construction Phase, the Commissioning Team should be comprised of the Owner/Owners representative; various design professionals, the General Contractor, the Construction Manager, Program Manager, specialty trade contractors, and the CA.
5.5.2 Commissioning Team Members Responsibilities

The Commissioning Team is responsible for verifying the operating systems, components, and equipment is installed properly so the equipment meets the OPR.
5.5.3 Commissioning Authority (CA)

The commissioning process works most effectively when implemented using a cooperative team approach. This cooperative effort is even more important during the Construction Phase. The CA generally has the primary responsibility to foster this sense of cooperation and focus on a common outcome. Further, the CA and Owner are responsible for championing the commissioning process among the Commissioning Team members to ensure conformance to the OPR.
5.5.4 Test Procedures

Pre-Functional Testing (PFT) and Functional Performance Testing (FPT) are performed during the Construction Phase. The responsibility for creating, administering, performing, and observing the various activities of the tests are outlined in the Commissioning Plan. Certain technical Pre-Functional tests may be performed by different members of the Commissioning Team.
5.5.5 Testing Evaluation

The CA verifies the proposed components, systems, and assemblies can be tested in a manner providing valid repeatable tests and manageable baseline data for the operators of the systems. The CA is responsible for creating the testing plans and forms for all Pre-Functional Tests. The use of factory start-up forms from the manufacturer is acceptable. The CA creates all Functional Performance Tests. Pre-Functional Tests include installation verification and start-up tests. Functional Performance Tests are used to verify the appropriate sequential performance of automated system and the stability of these
20
sequences under normal, upset and transitional conditions.
5.6
a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. l. m. n. o.
Construction Phase Activities

Conduct Commissioning Kick Off Meeting Conduct Construction Commissioning meetings Create commissioning duration schedules Perform submittal and shop drawing review Perform site observations for all systems and equipment Create pre-functional equipment installation check sheets Perform pre-functional equipment check sheets Create pre-functional equipment startup check sheets Perform pre-functional equipment Start Up Observe and document static tests Create and perform Functional Performance Tests (FPT) Accept functional tests Review O&M manuals Verify Owner Training Create final commissioning report
These activities are required during the Construction Phase:
5.6.1 Commissioning Kick-off Meeting

The kick-off meeting should be the first meeting conducted with all members of the Construction Phase Commissioning Team. The CA: a. b. c. d. e. f. g. Creates the agenda Attends and lead the meeting Reviews the Commissioning Plan with the team members Reviews the various commissioning activities and schedules Reviews documentation requirements Reviews communication and reporting procedures Prepares and distributes meeting minutes
5.6.2 Commissioning Meetings

The CA conducts periodic commissioning review meetings throughout the Construction Phase to monitor the progress of the commissioning activities. The CA: a. b. c. d. e. Creates the agenda Attends and leads the meeting Schedules and reviews the commissioning activities Coordinates with construction meetings and activities Prepares and distributes meeting minutes
5.6.3 Commissioning Activities Scheduled

The CA verifies commissioning activities are incorporated into the Construction schedule managed by the general contractor.
5.6.4 Approved Submittal and Shop Drawings Review

Submittals and shop drawings are documents provided by the contractors and vendors during the Construction Phase of a project. The submittals and shop drawings are reviewed by the responsible
21
design professionals and the CA. The CA is responsible for verifying the submittals conform to the OPR.
5.6.5 Site Observation Inspections

Site observations are routine inspections performed by the CA during the Construction Phase. The purpose of the inspections is to verify the construction complies with the Contract Documents and the OPR. Inspections also identify and document any quality issues leading to functional issues. Site observations are forwarded to the appropriate team member for their review and corrective action. Any site observation issues are added to the Issues Log for resolution.
5.6.6
Pre-Functional Installation Tests
The responsibility for creating, administering, performing, and observing the various activities during the Pre-Functional Tests are outlined in the Commissioning Plan and can be performed by different members of the Commissioning Team. The party responsible for performing each task is defined in the Contract Documents and the Commissioning Plan. These activities are performed by the Commissioning team as part of the Construction Phase Commissioning: a. b. c. d. e. Create and review installation PFT test forms Review installation verification requirements with members of the Commissioning Team Administer, observe and/or perform all PFT Report deficiencies on the Issues Log Distribute Issues Log to members of the Commissioning Team and manage the issue log for issue resolution
5.6.7 Pre-Functional Start Up Tests

The responsibility for creating, administering, performing, and observing the various startup activities during the construction phase are outlined in the Commissioning Plan and can be performed by different members of the Commissioning Team. The party responsible for performing each task is defined in the Contract Documents and the Commissioning Plan. These activities are performed by the Commissioning team as part of the Construction Phase Commissioning: a. b. c. d. e. Create and review startup PFT test forms Review startup verification requirements with members of the Commissioning Team Administer, observe and/or perform all startup PFT Report deficiencies on the Issues Log Distribute Issues Log to members of the Commissioning Team and manage the issue log for issue resolution
5.6.8 Static Tests

Static tests are performed by the contractors and the first test is observed by the CA. Additional tests are verified by commissioning team members as outlined in the Cx Plan. Code required tests that are observed and verified by the code authority are not required to be observed by the CA. Typical static tests are: a. Duct Pressure Tests b. Pipe Pressure Tests c. Pipe Flushing Tests d. Chlorination Tests
22

e. Bolted Connection Torque and Resistive Tests
5.6.9 Functional Performance Tests

Functional Performance Tests (FPT) verifies the appropriate sequential performance of automated systems and the stability of these sequences under normal, upset and transitional conditions. FPTs are used to verify the building systems are functional. As previously stated the responsibility for creating, administering, performing, and observing the various activities during the Functional Performance Tests are as outlined in the Commissioning Plan and can be performed by different members of the Commissioning Team. These activities are performed by the CA as part of Construction Phase Commissioning: a. Create and develop test forms and requirements that appropriately test the automated sequence b. Review and verify data measurements c. Administer, observe, and/or perform all FPT d. Report deficiencies on the Issues Log Distribute Issues Log to members of the Commissioning Team and manage the issue log for issue resolution
5.6.10
Issues Log and Deficiency Resolution
The CA is responsible for reporting deficiencies on the Issues Log and distributing the logs to the appropriate members of the Commissioning Team for resolution. The CA is responsible for working with the appropriate Commissioning Team members to ensure the issues are completely understood and the responsibilities for corrective action are completely understood. The Owner must verify that all Issue Log open items are resolved. After corrective action, retests are performed to verify conformance in accordance with the Commissioning Plan. All Issue Log items must be resolved and answered or accepted by the appropriate Commissioning Team member. Issues not resolved in a manner consistent with the OPR must be approved by the Owner. If issues remain unresolved at the end of the project for any reason a certified report can only be issued if the CA has attempted to obtain resolution a minimum of three times and has documented those attempts. An explanation and clarification of any unresolved issues must be included in the Final Commissioning Report Executive Summary.
5.6.11
Record Documents and Operations and Maintenance Information
The Owner, and/or his personnel, is thoroughly trained in the operation, maintenance, and function of the project, its equipment, systems, and components. In order to accomplish this activity, the contractors, and as outlined in the construction documents are responsible to provide Record Documents (As-Built Drawings) and Operations & Maintenance Manuals (O&Ms) as contractually required. These materials are normally reviewed by the appropriate design professionals before being sent to the Owner. The CA is responsible for evaluating the materials approved by the design professional prior to being sent to the Owner. The CA evaluates the completeness of the documentation from the standpoint of operator training and instruction for start-up, shut-down, operation, and maintenance information. These documents are be reviewed by the CA, the Owner and his operating personnel prior to the Owner training sessions as they form an integral component of the training sessions.
5.6.12
Owner Training Completion
The Owner, and/or his personnel, is thoroughly trained in the operation, maintenance, and function of the project, its equipment, systems, and components.
23
The CA is responsible for reviewing training agendas and training sessions with the instructors. a. The CA is responsible for reviewing training agendas and training sessions with the trainers. b. The CA may assist the Owner with staff selection. c. The design professionals are responsible for training the Owner on relevant design approaches incorporated in the design, especially design issues relating directly to operating and maintaining the facility. d. The contractors are responsible for training the Owner on relevant means, methods and construction techniques incorporated into the construction of the project impacting the ability to operate and maintain the facility. e. Equipment vendors are responsible for training the Owner on proper start-up/shut-down procedures of operating equipment and systems. The training sessions should cover normal operational features and routine maintenance requirements of the major items of operating equipment, systems, and components. The sessions should be tailored to the exact equipment, systems and components incorporated into the project and not just a generalized session on atypical maintenance items. f. The CA verifies and documents the training sessions have been performed.
5.6.13
Updating the Commissioning Plan, the OPR and the BOD
The Owner updates the OPR during Post-Occupancy Phase to incorporate any approved changes due to changes, additions, deletions, or other modifications. If any issues are design related, the design professionals should update the BOD. The Commissioning Plan is updated and further defined to reflect any changes to the OPR, BOD or Contract Documents.
5.6.14
Final Commissioning Report
The Final Commissioning Report contains all documentation from all of the Phases of the commissioning process. The CA is responsible for assembling the data into a Final Commissioning Report. The final report incorporates the final record documents for each system. A Transmittal cover page with signature line indicating acceptance is received from Owner after review of final report. The Commissioning Report includes: a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. l. Title Page Certification Page Table of Contents Executive Summary Commissioning Plan Completed Pre-Functional Commissioning Check Sheets and Forms Verification Data Completed Functional Performance Tests Observation Reports Issues Log All pertinent correspondence Test Instrument Page
5.6.15
Systems Manual
The purpose of the Systems Manual is to provide the Owner and building operators with a permanent record of all pertinent documents required for future operation, commissioning and validation processes of the facility. The Systems Manual should be provided to the Owner in electronic format. The final system manual should include these baseline requirements and be provided in digital format:
24

a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j.
Summary Final Approved Submittals and Shop Drawings Final OPR Final BOD Final Contract Documents (Record Drawings/ As-Built) Final Operating and Maintenance Manuals Final Commissioning Report Operator Training materials Recommended Standard Operating Procedures Testing Reports
5.6.16
Construction Phase Completion
Construction Phase Commissioning is complete when all construction FPTs are complete, all issue log items are resolved and the commissioning report is complete.
5.7
Construction Phase Deliverables
Documentation requirements prior to the Construction Phase include: a. Phase summary contains: 1. List of Phase deliverables to Owner 2. Summary of each document included in deliverable 3. Unresolved issues from issues log 4. Potential impacts of unresolved issues 5. Signature line for Owner acceptance b. Each of these documents must contain: date of document, project name, summary of content. 1. The updated OPR 2. Site Inspection reports 3. The updated Issues Log with noted corrections 4. The updated Commissioning Plan 5. All PFT reports 6. All FPT reports 7. Training Verification 8. The Construction Phase Commissioning Report 9. The Systems Manual
25
POST OCCUPANCY PHASE COMMISSIONING

5.8 Post Occupancy Phase Requirements
The OPR was identified in the Design Phase, and the CA has verified the design professionals have incorporated the OPR into the Contract Documents. During the Construction Phase, the building shell was erected and the systems, components, and equipment installed. Pre-Functional tests, Functional Performance Tests were performed to show construction meets the contract requirements. During the Post-Occupancy Phase, the building systems are complete and fully functional. The main focus of the commissioning efforts during the Post-Occupancy Phase is to: a. Verify the building is functionally complete and all open issue log items have been addressed. b. Coordinate the continued Owners Personnel Training c. Create and Perform deferred FPTs
5.8.1 Commissioning Team Members

During the Post-Occupancy Phase, the Commissioning Team may be comprised of the Owners representative; various design professionals, the Construction Manager, General Contractor, Program Manager, specialty trade contractors, and the CA.
5.8.2 Commissioning Team Responsibilities

The Commissioning Team is responsible to verify the testing of the installed and operating systems, components, and equipment meets the OPR.
5.8.3 Commissioning Authority (CA)

The commissioning process works most effectively when done in a cooperative team atmosphere. The CA and Owner generally have the primary responsibility to foster this sense of cooperation and focus on a common outcome. The CA and the Owner are responsible for championing the commissioning process among the Commissioning Team members to ensure conformance to the OPR.
5.9
a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i.
Post-Occupancy Phase Activities

Commissioning Schedule Deferred Testing Lessons learned workshop Create performance verification system Create Warranty Issue Log Perform and document performance verification tests (PVT) Optimize system performance Issue Resolution Create post-occupancy commissioning report
These activities are required during the Post-Occupancy Phase:
26
5.9.1 Commissioning Schedules

The CA should continue to monitor and update the commissioning schedules for the contractors for the commissioning activities in the Post-Occupancy Phase as required by the Commissioning Plan. These schedules should track all commissioning activities of the Commissioning Team.
5.9.2 Deferred Tests

If any PFT or FPT tests were deferred during the construction phase they are performed now in the post occupancy phase. Tests may be deferred due to schedule issues, seasonal issues or project phasing issues. The CA creates all PFTs and FPTs and has the final responsibility of verifying the commissioned systems, equipment and components are functional.
5.9.3 Lessons Learned Workshop

It is recommended the NEBB BSC CP performs a Lessons Learned workshop with the Owner, designers and/or construction team members. The purpose of the Lessons Learned workshop is to determine how to improve the design, construction and commissioning processes for future projects.
5.9.4 Create Performance Verification System

It is recommended the NEBB BSC CP assist the owners operators in setting up a performance verification system that will allow the operators to validate the performance of the building over time. This system will track energy usage performance and water usage performance and may track building IEQ performance if included in the SOW.
5.9.5 Create Warranty Issue Log

Normally at the 10 month of the warranty period the CA creates a warranty issue log that captures any warranty issues the operators have discovered since the building was completed. These outstanding warranty issues are provided to the contractor for resolution.
5.9.6 Performance Verification Testing (PVT)

Performance verification testing should be performed in the Post-Occupancy Phase. Performance verification tests are designed to prove performance of the systems. Performance is proved when the systems perform to their design intent at their predicted level of utility usage. The CA verifies and documents the tests are performed by the appropriate member of the Commissioning Team.
5.9.7 System Optimization

As a part of the performance verification system the Cx team optimizes the performance of each system by utilizing the basic Retro-Commissioning process to discover, analyze and correct any issues that are found that prevent systems from operating at their optimum condition. The cyclical nature of the PVT system of measuring, correcting and re-measuring performance is intended to keep the system performance from deteriorating over time.
5.9.8 Issue Resolution

All Issue Log items must be resolved and answered or accepted by the appropriate Commissioning Team member. Issues not resolved in a manner consistent with the OPR must be approved by the Owner.
5.9.9 Post Occupancy Cx Report

The CA shall produce either a Post Commissioning Phase report or an addendum to the final commissioning report for the Post Commissioning Phase. A Transmittal cover page with signature line
27
indicating acceptance is received from Owner after review of final report. The Post Occupancy phase report contains: a. b. c. d. Deferred testing reports Warranty Issue Log Documentation of Performance Verification System PVT test reports and documentation
5.9.10
Post-Occupancy Phase Completion
Post-Occupancy Phase Commissioning is complete when performance testing is complete and the post phase commissioning report is complete and accepted.
5.10 Post-Occupancy Phase Deliverables

Documentation requirements include: a. b. c. d. e. Deferred testing reports Warrant Issue Log Performance Verification System PVT Test Documentation Post Occupancy Phase Report
28
SECTION 6 COMMISSIONING OF HVAC SYSTEMS

INTRODUCTION
Section 6 describes the requirements for commissioning a projects HVAC systems, equipment and components. While Section 5 details the elements of the commissioning process in global terms, this section details the baseline requirements for a NEBB Certified HVAC Commissioning project. The actual scope of work may differ from these requirements. A NEBB Certified Report must include: a. The contracted scope of work is required to be clearly defined on the certification page of the report as specified in the contract documents or as agreed between the Owner / Buyer and the NEBB BSC Certified Firm. b. If the scope of work differs from the NEBB Procedural Standards it is clearly delineated on the certification page of the report. All contracted work must meet these Procedural Standards to be a NEBB Certified Report. (See Section 2)
6.1
The design phase for commissioning of HVAC system follows the same process as described in section 5 of this standard. The following specific procedures are specifically for HVAC systems:
6.1.1 OPR Definition and Development

The Owner produces the Owners Project Requirements (OPR) to facilitate the design and delivery of the project, with assistance from the NEBB CA. The NEBB CA documents the creation of the OPR. The OPR outlines the expectations the Owner has for the building envelope requirements of the project. The OPR includes these items relating to the HVAC systems: a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. l. m. n. o. p. q. r. Use and space requirements Anticipated occupancy Mechanical construction budget Indoor and outdoor building environmental requirements Special systems or equipment requirements affecting cooling and heating loads, ventilation requirements, etc. Specific material or equipment requirements Energy efficiency expectations Sustainability requirements Measurement and verification strategies Ongoing commissioning and building rating requirements Levels of redundancy Building automation / controls sophistication Vibration, sound, seismic or wind restraint requirements Operation and maintenance criteria Owners expectations for operator and occupant training Requirements for future facility adaptation and expansion Owners expectations of the design team and their produced documents Owners expectations of the construction team and their document requirements
29
s. Owners expectations of the Commissioning Authority and their document requirements The CA evaluates the BOD for conformance to the OPR from the standpoint of testability, accessibility, maintainability and efficient operation.
6.2
The construction phase for commissioning of HVAC system follows the same process as described in section 5 of this standard. The following specific procedures are specifically for HVAC systems:
6.2.1 Construction Phase Activities

These specific activities are required during the HVAC Construction Phase in addition to those general activities listed in section 5: a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. l. m. Create HVAC PFT equipment installation check sheets Perform HVAC PFT equipment installation verification Create Controls PFT installation check sheets Perform Controls PFT installation verification Observe and document HVAC static tests Create HVAC PFT startup check sheets Perform HVAC PFT startup Create Controls PFT point-to-point system startup check sheets Perform Controls PFT point-to-point system Start Up Perform TAB verification tests Create and perform HVAC Functional Performance Tests (FPT) Accept functional tests Create final commissioning report
6.2.2 HVAC Installation Verification Tests (PFT)

The contractor must verify all work is installed in accordance with the contract documents and / or the manufacturers recommendations and provide the associated check sheets verifying such. The contractor must document all equipment is installed in the correct location and is operable in accordance with the contract documents. The CA is required to provide the installation verification check sheets if not available from the manufacturers or contractors. The CA may perform the installation inspections at his discretion. The CA or his staff verifies the Installation Verification check sheets completed by the contractor by back checking them through site observations. Completion of all installation verification tests signifies those systems are ready for startup activities. Examples of these tests include: a. b. c. d. All piping systems and component installations All duct systems and component installations All HVAC equipment installation All building automation / control equipment and component installation by verifying point to point checks
6.2.3 Control System Installation Verification Tests (PFT)

The contractor must verify all work is installed in accordance with the contract documents and / or the manufacturers recommendations and provide the associated check sheets verifying such. The contractor must document all equipment is installed in the correct location and is operable in accordance with the contract documents. The CA may perform the installation inspections at his discretion. The CA or his staff verifies the Installation Verification check sheets completed by the
30
contractor by back checking them through site observations. Completion of all installation verification tests signifies those systems are ready for startup activities. Examples of these tests include: a. All control raceway and cable b. Controllers and Control device installation c. All I/O wiring terminations
6.2.4 Static Tests

The contractor must perform hydrostatic and pressure tests as described in the Contract Documents. All hydrostatic and pressure tests must be verified by contractor or code Authority Having Jurisdiction as required by the Contract Documents or as dictated by the local codes. The CA Firm is required to witness the first static test for each system. Completed static test sheets are then provided to the CA. Examples of these tests include: a. Hydrostatic testing of all piping systems to the appropriate test pressure and duration b. Pipe flushing and cleaning c. Pressure testing of all ducts for leakage determination
6.2.5 HVAC Equipment Startup Tests

The contractor or vendor who has contractual obligation to provide startup services performs the start up the systems and equipment in accordance with the Contract Documents and the manufacturers requirements. Completed startup check sheets are then provided to the CA. The CA firm is required to document these startup tests. At a minimum startup tests are required to include but not limited to: a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. Manufacturers Name Model Number Type and Size Serial Number Actual Settings or Adjustments Actual Electrical Characteristics Actual load Operating data as required by the manufacturer
6.2.6 Control System Startup Tests

The contractor or vendor who has contractual obligation to provide startup services performs the start up the systems and equipment in accordance with the Contract Documents and the manufacturers requirements. Completed startup check sheets are then provided to the CA. The CA firm is required to document these startup tests. At a minimum startup tests are required to include but not limited to: a. b. c. d. Verification of controller program is complete Verification of LAN communication Verification of graphic plate completion Verification of contractors point-to-point test
The CA is required to perform a separate commissioning 100% point-to-point test without any sampling strategies with the contractor. For the commissioning point-to-point test the CA shall provide and perform the check sheet with assistance from the contractor. This point-to-point test shall include: a. Point test from graphic to end device to prove device is connected correctly and with the correct polarity b. Calibration of all sensors with offsets documented c. Ranging of all output actuators is verified and documented
31
6.2.7 Testing, Adjusting And Balancing Report Verification

The CA is required to verify the completeness and accuracy of the final Testing, Adjusting and Balancing Report. This verification includes repeatable observations of selected TAB readings. The CA picks readings at random to be repeated. If these tests do not show repeatability to the TAB report within specified balance tolerances, discrepancies are documented on the issues log. Rebalancing of the system would be recommended at this time for system balance to be acceptable. The CA determines the extent and quantity of repeatability tests to prove the integrity of the balance efforts. Acceptable tolerances are defined in the Commissioning Plan. Typical repeatability checks: a. b. c. d. e. f. OSA flow and building pressurization Terminal unit calibration Exhaust system flow verification AHU readings verification CW & HW Pump flow verification Cooling tower balanced flow verification
6.2.8 Functional Performance Tests (FPT)

Functional Performance Tests are designed by the CA and performed by the Commissioning Team. The CA is required to observe and facilitate all FPTs. The exact systems to be functionally tested are detailed in the projects scope of work.
6.2.9 Create Final Commissioning Report

Based on the accumulated commissioning work completed as described above, the CA assembles the data into a final Commissioning Report. The final report incorporates the final record documents for each system, as appropriate
6.3
The post occupancy phase for commissioning of HVAC system follows the same process as described in section 5 of this standard. The CA is required to conduct a site inspection within one calendar year for the Post-Occupancy Phase commissioning. The following specific procedures are specifically for HVAC systems:
6.3.1 Post-Occupancy Performance Verification Testing

The CA is required to perform Performance Verification testing and review with the facility staff on the performance of the systems. The CA must evaluate if the systems are performing to the end users expectations. During the Post-Occupancy Phase the following apply if specified in the contract: a. Deferred testing - any test unable to be performed during the Construction Phase b. Opposite season testing - any test requiring testing during specific seasonal conditions c. Post-occupancy performance verification testing - would be the review of all the commissioned and tested systems to verify performance after occupant has used the facility for a specific amount of time The CA is also required to document and report on the performance verification tests, the final results and any issues found.
32
SECTION 7 COMMISSIONING OF BUILDING ENVELOPE

INTRODUCTION
Section 7 describes the requirements for commissioning a projects Building Envelope. While Section 5 details the elements of the commissioning process in global terms, this section details the baseline requirements for a NEBB Certified Building Envelope Commissioning project. The actual scope of work may differ from these requirements. A NEBB Certified Report includes: 1. The actual contracted scope of work is required to be clearly defined on the certification page of the report. 2. If the scope of work differs from the NEBB Procedural Standards it is clearly delineated on the certification page of the report. All contracted work must meet these Procedural Standards to be a NEBB Certified Report. See Section 2
7.1
The design phase for commissioning of Building Envelope system follows the same process as described in section 5 of this standard. The following specific procedures are specifically for Building Envelope systems:
7.1.1
OPR Definition and Development
The Owner produces the Owners Project Requirements (OPR) to facilitate the design and delivery of the project, with assistance from the NEBB CA. The NEBB CA documents the creation of the OPR. The OPR outlines the expectations the Owner has for the building envelope requirements of the project. The OPR includes items related to the Building Envelope intended use and function. a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. l. m. n. o. p. q. Use and space requirements Anticipated occupancy Building Envelope construction budget Building Envelope codes or standards to be utilized Special systems or equipment requirements affecting building envelope calculations and loads Specific material or equipment requirements Energy efficiency expectations Sustainability requirements Ongoing Commissioning and Building Rating Requirements Feature Automation and Controls sophistication Vibration, sound and / or seismic requirements Operation and maintenance criteria Owners expectations for operator and occupant training Requirements for future facility adaptation and expansion Owners expectations of the design team and their produced documents Owners expectations of the construction team and their document requirements Owners expectations of the Commissioning Authority and their document requirements
33
7.2
The Commissioning Team verifies the equipment and the systems are installed, in accordance with the design documents, are operable, maintainable and ready for functional testing during the Construction Phase. When this is complete, the Commissioning Team verifies the functionality of all systems, equipment, systems and components. The Commissioning Team verifies all systems are functioning in a manner conforming to the OPR. The Commissioning Team also coordinates the Owners Personnel Training. The Owner must update the OPR and the design professionals must update the BOD during Construction Phase to incorporate any approved envelope changes that may have developed. The CA updates the Commissioning Plan to include any changes to: a. b. c. d. e. f. Commissioning Team members Their responsibilities Contact information Procedures Schedules Changes to the commissioning requirements due to changes during the Construction Phase
7.2.1 Pre-Functional Tests (PFT)

There are several types of Building Envelope PFT s during the Construction Phase including installation verification tests, thermal scans, and special systems startup tests. Some typical Building Envelope special systems are: a. b. c. d. e. Automated doors Building pressure tests Automated windows Automated blinds and shades Other automated systems not part of Mechanical, Fire Protection, Electrical or Special Electrical systems
7.2.2 Installation Verification Check Sheets

The CA provides the installation check sheets to verify all work has been installed, in accordance with the contract documents and / or the manufacturers recommendations. The CA or his staff validates the Installation check sheets completed by the contractor by checking them through site observations. Completion of all installation verification tests signifies those systems are ready for start-up activities.
7.2.3 Static Tests

The contractor must perform static tests as described in the Contract Documents. The architect, contractor or CA as required by the Contract Documents must verify all static tests. The CA Firm is required to witness the first static test for each system. Completed static test sheets are then provided to the CA. Examples of these tests include: a. b. c. d. e. Whole building pressure tests Room or component pressure tests Rain Intrusion component test Field thermal conductance component test Field vapor transmittance component test
34
f. Moisture test g. Blast resistance or other extraordinary events testing
7.2.4 Building Envelope Special Systems Startup Tests (If Applicable)

The contractor or vendor who has contractual obligation to provide startup services creates startup check sheets, and starts up the systems and equipment in accordance with the Contract Documents and the manufacturers requirements. The CA firm is required to document these startup tests.

Functional Performance Tests are designed by the CA and performed by the Commissioning Team. The CA observes and facilitates the FPT. The FPT tests include: a. b. c. d. e. System or component description Specific item or function being tested Functional test procedure Description of test report documentation requirements Description of test pass/fail criteria
7.2.6 Create Final Commissioning Report

Based on the accumulated commissioning work completed as described above, the CA assembles the data into a final Commissioning Report. The final report incorporates the final record documents for each system, as appropriate.
7.3
7.3.1 Performance Verification Tests

The CA is required to conduct a site inspection within one calendar year for the Post-Occupancy Phase commissioning. The CA is required to perform Performance Verification testing and review with the facility staff on the performance of the systems. The CA must evaluate if the systems are performing to the end users expectations, During the Post-Occupancy Phase the following apply if specified in the contract: a. Deferred testing - any test unable to be performed during the Construction Phase b. Opposite season testing - any test requiring testing during specific seasonal conditions c. Post-occupancy performance verification testing - would be the review of all the commissioned and tested systems to verify performance after occupant has used the facility for a specific amount of time The CA is required to document and report on the performance verification tests, the final results and any issues found.
35
SECTION 8 COMMISSIONING OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS

INTRODUCTION
Section 8 describes the requirements for commissioning a projects Electrical Systems. While Section 5 details the elements of the commissioning process in global terms, this section details the baseline requirements for a NEBB Certified Electrical System Commissioning project. The actual scope of work may differ from these requirements. A NEBB Certified Report includes: a. The contracted scope of work is required to be clearly defined on the certification page of the report b. If the scope of work differs from the NEBB Procedural Standards it is clearly delineated on the certification page of the report. All contracted work must meet the requirements of these Procedural Standards to be a NEBB Certified Report. (See Section 2)
8.1
The design phase for commissioning of Electrical Systems follows the same process as described in section 5 of this standard. The following specific procedures are specifically for Electrical Systems:
8.1.1 OPR definition and development

The Owner produces the Owners Project Requirements (OPR) to facilitate the design and delivery of the project, with assistance from the NEBB CA. The NEBB CA documents the creation of the OPR. The OPR outlines the expectations the Owner has for the electrical requirements of the project. The OPR includes these items related to electrical systems use and function: a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. l. m. n. o. p. q. Use and space requirements Anticipated occupancy Electrical construction budget Electrical codes or standards to be utilized Special systems or equipment requirements affecting electrical calculations and loads Specific material or equipment requirements Energy efficiency expectations Lighting systems and components Sustainability requirements Electrical testing requirements Measurement and verification strategies Ongoing commissioning and building rating requirements Levels of redundancy Electrical automation and controls sophistication Vibration, sound and / or seismic requirements Operation and maintenance criteria Owners expectations for operator and occupant training
36
r. s. t. u.
Requirements for future facility adaptation and expansion Owners expectations of the design team and their produced documents Owners expectations of the construction team and their document requirements Owners expectations of the Commissioning Authority and their document requirements
8.2
The Commissioning Team verifies the equipment and systems are installed in accordance with the design documents and are operable, maintainable and ready for functional testing. Once this is complete, the Commissioning Team works to verify the functionality of all systems, equipment, systems and components. The Commissioning Team verifies all systems are functioning in a manner conforming to the OPR. The Commissioning Team also coordinates the Owners Personnel Training. The Owner must update the OPR and the design professionals must update the BOD during Construction Phase to incorporate any approved Electrical changes incorporated into the final construction. The CA updates the Commissioning Plan to include any changes to the Commissioning Team members, their responsibilities, contact information, procedures, schedules or changes to the commissioning requirements during the Construction Phase.

Electrical PFTs are performed during the Construction Phase: installation verification tests, static tests, and equipment startup tests.
8.2.2 Installation Verification Check Sheets

The CA provides the installation verification check sheets for the contractor to verify all work in installed in accordance with the contract documents and / or the manufacturers recommendations. The CA or his staff validates the Installation Verification check sheets completed by the contractor by back checking them through site observations. Completion of all installation verification tests signifies those systems are ready for start-up activities.
8.2.3 Static Tests

The contractor must perform resistance and torque tests as described in the Contract Documents. All tests must be verified and documented by contractor or code Authority Having Jurisdiction as required by the Contract Documents or local codes. The CA Firm is required to witness the first static test for each system. Completed static test sheets are then provided to the CA. Examples of these tests include: Examples of these tests may include: a. Conductor resistive tests b. Bolted Connections Torque settings and resistive tests c. System High Potential Tests d. Transformer Oil Tests e. Ground Resistance Test
8.2.4 Special Systems Start-up Tests

Code authorities require special system inspections be performed by the Electrical Engineer of Record prior to energizing a systems. Each code authority may require special system inspections on different pieces of electrical equipment. The CA firm is required to document these startup tests. Normally special systems inspections are required for:
37
a. Conductors from Utility Transformer to entrance section b. Entrance section and main switch gear c. Generators and transfer switches

Functional Performance Tests are designed by the CA and performed by the Commissioning Team. The CA observes and facilitates the FPT. Examples of these tests may include: a. Emergency power system test b. Witness 3rd party infrared scan of equipment and bolted connections c. Witness load balance of panels d. Verify power quality test
8.3
8.3.1 Post-Occupancy Systems Tests

The CA is required to conduct a site inspection within one calendar year for the Post-Occupancy Phase commissioning. .The CA is required to perform Performance Verification testing and review with the facility staff on the performance of the systems. The CA must evaluate if the systems are performing to the end users expectations. During the Post-Occupancy Phase the following apply if specified in the contract: a. Deferred testing - any test unable to be performed during the Construction Phase b. Opposite season testing - any test requiring testing during specific seasonal conditions c. Post-occupancy performance verification testing - would be the review of all the commissioned and tested systems to verify performance after occupant has used the facility for a specific amount of time. The CA is also required to document and report on the performance verification tests, the final results and any issues found.
38
SECTION 9 COMMISSIONING OF SPECIAL ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS

INTRODUCTION
Section 9 describes the requirements for commissioning a projects Special Electrical Systems. While Section 5 details the elements of the commissioning process in global terms, this section details the baseline requirements for a NEBB Certified Electrical System Commissioning project. The actual scope of work may differ from these requirements. A NEBB Certified Report includes: a. The contracted scope of work is required to be clearly defined on the certification page of the report b. If the scope of work differs from the NEBB Procedural Standards it is clearly delineated on the certification page of the report. All contracted work must meet the requirements of these Procedural Standards to be a NEBB Certified Report. (See Section 2)
9.1
The design phase for commissioning of Special Electrical Systems follows the same process as described in section 5 of this standard. The following specific procedures are specifically for Special Electrical Systems:

The Owner produces the Owners Project Requirements (OPR) to facilitate the design and delivery of the project, with assistance from the NEBB CA. The NEBB CA documents the creation of the OPR. The OPR outlines the Owners expectations for the electrical requirements of the project. The OPR should include the following relating to the special electrical systems use and function: a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. l. m. n. o. Use and space requirements Anticipated occupancy Electrical construction budget Electrical codes or standards to be utilized Special systems or equipment requirements that may affect electrical calculations and loads Specific material or equipment requirements Energy efficiency expectations Lighting systems and components Sustainability requirements Electrical testing requirements Measurement and verification strategies Ongoing commissioning and building rating requirements Levels of redundancy Electrical automation and controls sophistication Vibration, sound and / or seismic requirements
39

p. q. r. s. t. u.
Operation and maintenance criteria Owners expectations for operator and occupant training Requirements for future facility adaptation and expansion Owners expectations of the design team and their produced documents Owners expectations of the construction team and their document requirements Owners expectations of the Commissioning Authority and their document requirements
9.2

There are several types of Special Electrical Systems PFT performed during the Construction Phase including verification tests, static tests, and system startup tests.
9.2.2 Special Electrical Systems Equipment and Controls Installation Verification Tests
The contractor must verify all work is installed in accordance with the contract documents and / or the manufacturers recommendations. The CA provides the associated check sheets verifying successful completion. The contractor must document all equipment is installed in the correct location and operates in accordance with the contract documents. The CA must provide the installation verification check sheets if not available from the manufacturers. The CA or his staff verifies the Installation Verification check sheets completed by the contractor by checking them through site observations. Completion of all installation verification tests signifies those systems are ready for startup activities. Examples of these tests include: a. All conductor and raceway installations b. All Special Electrical Systems equipment installation c. All Special Electrical Systems Control equipment and component installation Installation Verification tests may include but are not limited to: a. Material or Equipment Name or description b. Model Number c. Type and Size d. Serial Number (If applicable) e. Installation and location to design requirements verification f. Maintenance access verification g. Installation complete
9.2.3 Static Tests

The contractor must perform resistance and torque tests as described in the Contract Documents. All tests must be verified and documented by contractor or code Authority Having Jurisdiction as required by the Contract Documents or as dictated by the local codes. The CA Firm is required to witness the first static test for each system. Completed static test sheets are then provided to the CA. Examples of these tests include: a. Conductor polarity tests b. Supervised wiring resistance measurement for Fire Alarm systems
40
NEBB BSC PROCEDURAL STANDARD 9.2.4 Special Systems Inspections
Some Code authorities require special system inspections be performed by the Special Systems Inspector and may also require the Engineer of Record stamp the special systems inspection report prior to accepting the system. Each code authority may require special system inspections on different pieces of Special Electrical Systems equipment.
9.2.5 Special Electrical Systems Equipment Startup Tests

The contractor, vendor or testing agency with contractual obligation to provide startup services, start up the systems and equipment in accordance with the Contract Documents and the manufacturers requirements must complete the Startup sheets. Completed startup check sheets are then provided to the CA. The CA firm is required to document these startup tests. Startup tests may include but are not limited to: a. Manufacturers Name b. Model Number c. Type and Size d. Serial Number e. Actual Settings or Adjustments f. Actual Special Electrical Systems Characteristics g. Operating data as required by the manufacturer
9.2.6 Special Electrical Systems Specific Startup Tests

The CA performs a 100% point-to-point system test as verification of the special electrical system operational status with no sampling strategies allowed. The control point-to-point test verifies the system operation from the system main communication device clear to the end device. The control tests may include but not limited to: a. Fire Alarm i. Point-to-point test of all connected devices ii. Response testing of all zone and device alarms iii. Response testing of all horns, speakers, phones, strobes and alarm devices iv. Smoke control system testing b. Security Systems i. Point-to-point test of all connected devices ii. Response testing of all input and control devices iii. Response testing of all alarms c. CCTV Systems i. Point-to-point test of all connected devices ii. Response testing of all zone and device alarms iii. Response testing of all cameras, camera controls and recorders d. Telephone Systems i. Point-to-point test of all connected devices ii. Response testing of all phone sets and consoles iii. Response testing of all connected lines e. Paging and Intercom Systems i. Point-to-point test of all connected devices ii. Response testing of all speakers and consoles f. Music and White Noise Systems i. Point-to-point test of all connected speakers and devices ii. Response testing of all zones
41
g. Nurses Call Systems i. Point-to-point test of all connected devices ii. Response testing of all call devices iii. Response testing of all consoles h. Network Data Systems i. Wire continuity testing to verify jacks are connected and active ii. Signal Strength Testing Start Up check sheets and forms typically include: a. Product Manufacturer b. Component identification c. Verification of component communication d. Verification of action and polarity e. Verification of status indication f. Verify functionality described above

Functional Performance Tests are designed by the CA and performed by the Commissioning Team. The CA or his staff observe and facilitate the FPT for all systems having operating sequences. The CA provides final approval for Functional Performance Test results. The FPT tests include: a. b. c. d. e. f. g. System description Specific function being tested Functional test design Description of testing procedure Description of test duration Description of test report documentation requirements Description of test pass/fail criteria
Special Electrical Systems Functional Performance Tests typically include: a. Fire Alarm i. All points report without any alarms or trouble indicated on supervised cables b. Security Systems i. Reports indicating specified tracking activity c. CCTV Systems i. Observe functionality of alarms and indicators ii. Observe functionality of alarm reports iii. Observe functionality of archive functions d. Telephone Systems i. Observe functionality of reports e. Paging and Intercom Systems i. No Functional test requirements f. Music and White Noise Systems i. No Functional test requirements g. Nurses Call Systems i. No Functional test requirements h. Network Data Systems i. No Functional test requirements
42
9.3
9.3.1 Post-Occupancy Systems Tests

The CA is required to conduct a site inspection within one calendar year for the Post-Occupancy Phase commissioning. The CA is required to perform Performance Verification testing and review with the facility staff on the performance of the systems. The CA must evaluate if the systems are performing to the end users expectations. During the Post-Occupancy phase the following apply if specified in the contract: a. Deferred testing - any test unable to be performed during the Construction Phase b. Opposite season testing - any test requiring testing during specific seasonal conditions c. Post-occupancy performance verification testing - would be the review of all the commissioned and tested systems to verify performance after occupant has used the facility for a specific amount of time The CA is required to document and report on the performance verification tests, the final results and any issues found.
43
SECTION 10 COMMISSIONING OF PLUMBING SYSTEMS

INTRODUCTION
The purpose of Section 10 is to describe the requirements for commissioning a projects Plumbing Systems. While Section 5 details the elements of the commissioning process in global terms, this section details the baseline requirements for a NEBB Certified Special Electrical System Commissioning project. The actual scope of work may differ from these requirements. A NEBB Certified Report includes: a. The actual contracted scope of work is required to be clearly defined on the certification page of the report as specified in the contract documents or as agreed to between the Owner / Buyer and the NEBB BSC Certified Firm. b. If the scope of work differs from the NEBB Procedural Standards it is clearly delineated on the certification page of the report, otherwise all contracted work must be adhered to for a NEBB Certified Report. (See Section 2)
10.1 DESIGN PHASE COMMISSIONING

The Owner produces the Owners Project Requirements (OPR) to facilitate the design and delivery of the project, with assistance from the NEBB CA. The NEBB CA documents the creation of the OPR. The OPR outlines the Owners expectations for the Plumbing requirements of the project. The OPR should include the following relating to the Plumbing systems use and function: a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. l. m. n. o. p. q. Use and space requirements Anticipated occupancy Plumbing construction budget Plumbing codes or standards to be utilized Special systems or equipment requirements affecting plumbing calculations and loads Specific material or equipment requirements Energy and water efficiency expectations Sustainability requirements Measurement and verification strategies Ongoing commissioning and building rating requirements Levels of redundancy Building automation / controls sophistication Vibration, sound and / or seismic requirements Operation and maintenance criteria Owners expectations for operator and occupant training Requirements for future facility adaptation and expansion Owners expectations of the design team and their produced documents
44
r. Owners expectations of the construction team and their document requirements s. Owners expectations of the Commissioning Authority and their document requirements
10.2 CONSTRUCTION PHASE COMMISSIONING

The Commissioning Team verifies the equipment and systems are installed, in accordance with the design during the Construction Phase. The CA verifies the equipment is operable, maintainable and ready for functional testing. Once this is complete, the Commissioning Team works to verify the functionality of all systems, equipment, systems and components. The Commissioning Team verifies all systems are functioning in a manner conforming to the OPR. The Commissioning Team also coordinates the level of Owners Personnel Training. The Owner must update the OPR and the design professionals must update the BOD during Construction Phase to incorporate any approved plumbing changes incorporated into the final construction. The CA updates the Commissioning Plan to include any changes in the Commissioning Team members, their responsibilities, contact information, procedures, schedules or changes to the commissioning requirements because of any changes occurring during the Construction Phase.
10.2.1
Pre-Functional Tests (PFT)
Plumbing PFTs are performed during the Construction Phase including installation verification tests, static tests, and equipment startup tests.
10.2.2
Plumbing and Controls Installation Verification Tests
The contractor verifies all work is installed in accordance with the contract documents and / or the manufacturers recommendations and provide the proper associated check sheets showing this verification. The contractor must document all equipment is installed in the correct location and is operating in accordance with the contract documents. The CA should create and provide the installation verification check sheets if not available from the manufacturers. The CA or his staff validates the Installation Verification check sheets completed by the contractor by checking them through site observations. Proper completion of all installation verification tests signifies those systems are ready for startup activities. Examples of these tests include: a. All piping systems, and component installations b. All Plumbing equipment and fixture installation c. All Plumbing Control equipment and component installation
10.2.3
Static Tests
The contractor must perform hydrostatic and pressure tests as described in the Contract Documents. All hydrostatic and pressure tests must be verified by contractor or code Authority Having Jurisdiction code Authority Having Jurisdiction as required by the Contract Documents or as dictated by the local codes. The CA Firm is required to witness the first static test for each system. Completed static test sheets are then provided to the CA. Examples of these tests include: a. Hydrostatic testing of all piping systems to the appropriate test pressure and duration b. Slope verification tests
45
10.2.4
Plumbing Equipment Startup Tests
The contractor or vendor, who has contractual obligation to provide startup services, starts up the systems and equipment in accordance with the Contract Documents and the manufacturers requirements. Completed startup check sheets are then provided to the CA. The CA firm is required to document these startup tests. The minimum startup tests include: a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. Manufacturers name Model number Type and size Serial number Actual settings or adjustments Actual electrical characteristics Actual load Operating data as required by the manufacturer
10.2.5
Functional Performance Tests
There are several types of Plumbing FPT recommended to be performed during the Construction Phase: a. Chlorination system verification b. Mixing valve set up c. Domestic HW Recovery GPH testing The CA verifies all potable water system have been cleaned, chlorinated and flushed in accordance with the specifications and local code requirements. This verification includes witnessing FPT tests. The CA includes copies of all Chlorination test results in the final commissioning report.
10.3 POST OCCUPANCY PHASE COMMISSIONING

The CA is required to conduct a site inspection within one calendar year for the Post-Occupancy Phase commissioning. The CA is required to perform Performance Verification testing and review with the facility staff on the performance of the systems. The CA must evaluate if the systems are performing to the end users expectations. During the Post-Occupancy Phase the following apply if specified in the contract: a. Deferred Testing - any test unable to be performed during the Construction Phase b. Opposite season testing - any test requiring testing during specific seasonal conditions c. Post-occupancy performance verification testing - would be the review of all the commissioned and tested systems to verify performance after occupant has used the facility for a specific amount of time The CA is required to document and report on the performance verification tests, the final results and any issues found.
46
SECTION 11 COMMISSIONING OF FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS

INTRODUCTION
The purpose of Section 11 is to describe the requirements for commissioning a projects Fire Protection Systems. While Section 5 details the elements of the commissioning process in global terms, this section details the baseline requirements for a NEBB Certified Fire Protection System Commissioning project. The actual scope of work may differ from these requirements. A NEBB Certified Report must include: a. The actual contracted scope of work is required to be clearly defined on the certification page of the report as specified in the contract documents or as agreed to between the Owner / Buyer and the NEBB BSC Certified Firm. b. If the scope of work differs from the NEBB Procedural Standards it is clearly delineated on the certification page of the report, otherwise all contracted work must be adhered to for a NEBB Certified Report.
11.1 DESIGN PHASE COMMISSIONING

The Owner produces the Owners Project Requirements (OPR) to facilitate the design and delivery of the project, with assistance from the NEBB CP. The NEBB CP documents the creation of the OPR. The OPR outlines the expectations the Owner has for the fire protection requirements of the project. The OPR includes these items related to the fire protection system use and function: a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. l. m. n. o. Use and space requirements Anticipated occupancy types by area Fire protection construction budget Fire protection codes and design standards to be utilized Special systems or equipment requirements affecting fire protection calculations and loads Specific material or equipment requirements Energy and water efficiency expectations Levels of redundancy Vibration, sound and / or seismic requirements Operation and maintenance criteria Owners expectations for operator and occupant training Requirements for future facility adaptation and expansion Owners expectations of the design team and their produced documents Owners expectations of the construction team and their document requirements Owners expectations of the NEBB CP and their document requirements
47
11.2 CONSTRUCTION PHASE COMMISSIONING

There are several types of fire protection PFTs performed during the Construction Phase including installation verification tests, static tests and equipment startup tests.
11.2.2
Fire Protection and Controls Installation Verification Tests
The contractor verifies all work is installed in accordance with the contract documents and / or the manufacturers recommendations. The CA provides the associated check sheets verifying successful completion. The contractor must document all equipment is installed in the correct location and operates in accordance with the contract documents. The CA must provide the installation verification check sheets if not available from the manufacturers. The CA or his staff verifies the Installation Verification check sheets completed by the contractor by checking them through site observations. Proper completion of all installation verification tests signifies those systems are ready for startup activities. Examples of these tests include: a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. l. m. n. o. p. Fire alarm device installation Water-based sprinkler system installation Standpipe and hose system installation Water spray fixed system installation Foam water system installation Water mist system installation Wet chemical system installation Dry chemical system installation Inert gas system installation Low expansion foam system installation Private fire service main installation Private hydrant installation Water tank installation Stationary pump for fire protection installation Smoke-control system installation Emergency power system installation
Installation verification tests include: a. Material or equipment name or description b. Model number c. Type and size d. Serial number (if applicable) e. Installation and location to design requirements f. Maintenance/service access g. Installation complete
11.2.3
Static Tests
The contractor must perform hydrostatic and pressure tests as described in the project specifications or contract documents. All hydrostatic and pressure tests are to be verified by the responsible contractor or code authority as required by the project specifications, contract documents, or as dictated by local code. The CA Firm is required to witness the first static test for each system. Completed static test sheets are then provided to the CA. Examples of these tests include:
48
a. Hydrostatic testing of all piping/sprinkler systems to the appropriate test pressure and duration b. Slope verification tests
11.2.4
Fire Protection Equipment Startup Tests
The contractor or vendor, who has contractual obligation to provide startup services, starts up the systems and equipment in accordance with the project specifications or contract documents, and the manufacturers requirements. The completed startup check sheets are provided to the CA. The CA firm is required to document these startup tests. Startup test includes this data: a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. Manufacturer name Model number Type and size Serial number Actual settings or adjustments Actual electrical characteristics Actual load Operating data as required by the manufacturer
Startup tests include this equipment: a. Fire pumps b. Antifreeze concentration tests c. Air compressors d. Riser components and systems e. Storage heating systems
11.2.5
Control and Integrated System Startup Tests
The NEBB CP or responsible contractor provides a 100% point-to-point control system test as verification of the control system operational status, with no sampling strategies allowed. The control Point-to-point test verifies the system operation from the system graphic to the end sensor or control device. The 100% point-to-point control tests include: a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. Controller manufacturer Controller or system identification Verification of controller communication Pin address Point ID and name Point type Connected device description Verification of action and polarity Verification of status indication Actual sensor reading, system reading and offset
Control startup tests includes: a. Fire pump automatic controls b. Fire alarm interlock systems c. Air compressor automatic controls d. Riser component system controls e. Storage heating system controls
49
11.2.6
System Chemical Treatment Verification
The NEBB CP verifies the piping has been cleaned and treated with chemicals in accordance with the specifications and local code requirements. This verification includes witnessing of chemical tests performed by the responsible contractor. The NEBB CP includes copies of all chemical test results in the final commissioning report.
11.2.7
Functional Performance Tests (FPT)
Functional performance tests are designed by the CA and carried out by the responsible contractor, with assistance from the CA. The CA conducts and facilitates the FPTs for all systems having operating sequences. The CA provides final approval of functional performance test results. FPTs are performed for all sequences, with no sampling strategies allowed, except for application specific, factory programmed devices that cannot be modified in the field. The functional performance tests include: a. System description b. Specific function being tested c. Functional test design d. Description of data points tested e. Description of test duration and test interval times f. Description of test set points and set point changes g. Description of test report documentation requirements h. Description of test pass/fail criteria Functional performance tests include: a. Fire pump control sequence, including emergency power b. Fire alarm interlocked systems, including emergency power c. Typical manual pull station, by device d. Typical elevator recall smoke detector, by device and by floor e. Elevator machine room smoke detector f. Typical smoke detector, by device g. Typical wet sprinkler system flow control valve assembly flow switch, by floor h. Typical wet sprinkler system flow control valve assembly tamper switch, by floor i. Typical pre-action sprinkler system flow control valve assembly flow switch, by floor j. Typical pre-action sprinkler system flow control valve assembly tamper switch, by floor k. Kitchen/cafeteria wet chemical system l. Typical duct smoke detector, by device and by floor
11.3 POST OCCUPANCY PHASE COMMISSIONING

The CA is required to conduct a site inspection within one calendar year for the Post-Occupancy Phase commissioning. The CA is required to perform Performance Verification testing and review with the facility staff on the performance of the systems. The CA must evaluate if the systems are performing to the end users expectations. During the Post-Occupancy Phase the following apply if specified in the contract: a. Deferred testing - any test unable to be performed during the Construction Phase b. Opposite season testing - any test requiring testing during specific seasonal conditions c. Post-occupancy performance verification testing - would be the review of all the commissioned and tested systems to verify performance after occupant has used the facility for a specific amount of time
50
The CA is also required to document and report on the performance verification tests, the final results and any issues found.
51
NORMATIVE APPPENDIX A
APPENDICES
Normative Appendix A - Acronyms
AHJ AHU ANSI BET BOD BSC CA CCTV CD CM/GC CO CO2 CP CPT CW Cx Cx-NC DD DDC DPC FHT FPT GPH HVAC HW ID IEQ IP LAN NEBB O&M OPR OSA PFT PVT RCx S SD SI SO SOP SOW TAB V Authority Having Jurisdiction Air Handling Unit American National Standards Institute Building Envelope Testing Certification Basis of Design Building Systems Commissioning Commissioning Authority Closed Circuit Television Contract Documents Construction Manager / General Contractor Carbon monoxide Carbon dioxide Certified Professional Clean Room Performance Test Certification Chilled Water Commissioning Commissioning New Construction Design Development Direct Digital Control Design Phase Commissioning Fume Hood Testing Certification Functional Performance Test Gallons per Hour Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning Hot Water Identification Indoor Environment Quality Inch-Pounds measurement system Local Area Network National Environmental Balancing Bureau Operating and Maintenance Manual Owners Project Requirements Outside Air Pre-Functional Test Performance Verification Testing Retro Commissioning Sound Testing Certification Schematic Design International System of measurement Site Observation Standard Operating Procedure Scope of Work Testing, Adjusting and Balancing Vibration Testing Certification
52
NORMATIVE APPPENDIX B
Normative Appendix B - Definitions

Acceptance Criteria: 1. The value, or range of values, compared to the measured value that determines if the test results pass or fail. 2. A test made upon completion of fabrication, receipt, installation or modification of a component unit or system to verify it meets the requirements specified. Acceptance Phase Commissioning: Commissioning tasks executed after the construction has been completed, all Site Observations and Static Tests have been completed and all PreFunctional Testing has been completed and accepted. The main commissioning activities performed during this phase are verification that the installed systems are functional as verified by conducting Functional Performance tests and Owner Training. Accuracy: The capability of an instrument to indicate the true value of a measured quantity. Activities: The individual steps or action items necessary to complete a course of action in the NEBB RCx program. Basis of Design (BOD): The Engineers Basis of Design is comprised of two components: the Design Criteria, and the Design Narrative. These documents record the concepts, calculations, decisions, and product selections used to meet the Owners Project Requirements (OPR) and to satisfy applicable regulatory requirements, standards, and guidelines. Building Envelope: The boundary or barrier separating the interior volume of a building from the outside environment. Calibrate (Calibration): The act of comparing an instrument of unknown accuracy with a standard of known accuracy to detect, correlate, report, or correct by adjustment unacceptable variation in the accuracy of the tested instrument. Certificate of Compliance (Conformance): A written statement, signed by a qualified party, attesting the items or services are in accordance with specified requirements, and accompanied by additional information to substantiate the statement. Certification: The process of validation required to obtain a Certificate of Compliance. Checklist: List of data or inspections verified to ensure proper system or component installation, operation and function. Closed Circuit Television (CCTV): Used for security surveillance and alarm detections as part of a special electrical security system. Commissionability: A design component or construction process with the necessary elements to allow a system or component to be effectively measured, tested, operated and commissioned. Commissioning Authority (CA): The NEBB Certified BSC Professional (NEBB BSC CP) who administers the Cx process by managing the Cx team. The CA is responsible, in the standard,
53
to identify the NEBB BSC or RCx CP, members of his staff, or appointed members of the commissioning team. Commissioning Plan: A document that outlines the project scope and defines responsibilities, procedures, schedules, and documentation requirements of the Commissioning Process. Commissioning Process: A quality focused approach of using clearly defined procedures for enhancing the delivery of a project. The approach focuses upon verifying and documenting that the facility and all of its systems, components, and assemblies are planned, designed, installed, tested, can be operated and maintained to meet the Owner's Project Requirements. Commissioning Report: The final document that presents the commissioning results for the project, including reports, an executive summary, commissioning plan, issue log, correspondence, and all appropriate check sheets and test forms. Commissioning Team: Team members whose coordinated activities are responsible for implementing the Commissioning Process. Construction Documents: Construction documents usually include the project manual (specifications), plans (drawings), and general terms and conditions of the contract. These documents vary from project to project, as the owner needs change and as various State, Federal, or International regulations dictate. Construction Phase Commissioning (CPC): All commissioning efforts executed during the construction process after the design phase and prior to the Post Occupancy Phase Commissioning. Contract Document Evaluation: A NEBB Certified Firm evaluation of the contract plans and specifications is limited to determining the scope of responsibilities and reporting. Control Loop Stability: The ability of a controlled point to maintain its setpoint within defined limits. Control Loop Response Time: The time required for a controlled point to respond to a setpoint change. Control Loop Tuning: The capability to adjust response time of a PID controlled point to meet the sequence of operation requirement. Continuous Commissioning Process: A continuation of the Commissioning Process well into the Occupancy and Post Occupancy Phase. This process verifies that a project continues to meet current and evolving Owners Project Requirements. Continuous Commissioning Process activities are ongoing for the life of the facility. Contract Document Review: A NEBB Certified TAB Firm review of the contract plans and specifications is limited to determining the proper placement of balancing devices. A NEBB Certified TAB Firm is not responsible for the review of equipment sizing, design load calculations or any other engineering function that is properly the responsibility of the design professional.
54
Contract Documents (CD): Contract documents include design and construction contracts, financial and scope of work agreements, all plans and specifications. Coordination Drawings: Drawings showing the work of all trades used to illustrate that equipment can be installed in the space allocated without compromising equipment function or access for maintenance and replacement. These drawings graphically illustrate equipment dimensions and manufacturers recommended maintenance clearances. Corrective Action: Repairing, replacing, re-building, calibrating or adjusting of equipment or systems. Data Logger: A test instrument used to record specific readings over time. Normally a battery operated instrument with multiple channels for more than one reading. Deferred Maintenance: Maintenance procedures not done due to costs, lack of manpower or proper maintenance. Deferred System Test: Tests that cannot be completed at the end of the Construction Phase due to ambient conditions, schedule issues or other conditions preventing testing. Deficiency: Any installation, measurement, or finding outside the tolerances allowed by NEBB Procedural Standards or project specifications. Design Criteria: A listing of the projects design requirements, including the source of the design requirements. These are used during the design phase review to show the design element meets the OPR. Design Development (DD): Design Development takes the Schematic Design (SD) phase and turns these conceptual plans into one-line duct and piping drawings with identifiable zones. Specifications would be in outline form with typical details shown. DD includes preliminary equipment schedules. Design Intent: Documents providing a written, detailed record of ideas, concepts and criteria defined as important by the owner. The overall term includes the OPR and the BOD. Design Phase Commissioning (DPC): All commissioning tasks executed during the project Design Phase. Design Professional: The design professional, architect or engineer of record of the project. Discovery Phase: The portion of the RCx phase where drawing and specification review, document review and site investigation occur. This phase typically defines the significant issues causing comfort and maintenance problems as well as excessive energy use. Environmental Systems: Systems using a combination of mechanical equipment, airflow, water flow and electrical energy to provide heating, ventilating, air conditioning, humidification, and dehumidification for the purpose of human comfort or process control of temperature and humidity. Executive Summary: A section of the Commissioning Report that reviews the general outcome of the project. It includes any unresolved issues, recommendations for the resolution of unresolved issues, and all deferred testing requirements.
55
Fenestration: Any opening in a building structure such as windows, skylights, window walls, doors, louvers, and access panels. Functional Performance Test (FPT): Verification of the appropriate sequential performance of automated systems and stability of these sequences under normal, upset and transitional conditions. Functionality: A design component or construction process allowing a system or component to operate or be constructed in a manner producing the required outcome of the OPR. Graphic Verification Tests: Tests intended to prove the graphic diagrams on the DDC screen are factual and represent the actual arrangement and operation of a system or component in the field. Greywater: Untreated wastewater that has no come into contact with toilet waste, kitchen sink waste, dishwasher waste or similarly contaminated sources. Grey water includes wastewater from bathtubs, showers, lavatories, clothes washer and laundry tubs. (Also known as: grey water, graywater, or greywater.) Harmonics: frequency. A sinusoidal component that is a whole number multiple of the fundamental
Implementation Phase: The portion of the project where courses of corrective actions are made to various HVAC, electrical or building envelope components of the project. Control sequences or Test and Balance adjustments are completed during this portion of the project. Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ): The relative quality of the indoor air environment and normally includes temperature, humidity, levels of CO2 and amounts of particulates such as dust, ozone, formaldehyde, volatile organic compounds (VOC) and other trace elements. IEQ can also relate to biological contamination such as mold or Legionella bacteria and quality of the space for sound & vibration, views, and daylighting. Industry Accepted Best Practice: A design component or construction procedure that has achieved industry consensus for quality performance and functionality. Refer to NEBB Design Phase Commissioning Handbook for examples. Informative Appendices - The informative appendices to NEBB Procedural Standards and informative notes located within the Procedural Standards contain additional information and are not mandatory or part of the Procedural Standards. Infrared Imaging System: An instrument that converts the spatial variations in infrared radiance from a surface into a two-dimensional image of that surface, in which variations in radiance are displayed as a range of colors or tones. Infrared Thermography: The process of generating thermal images that represent temperature and emittance variations over the surfaces of objects. Installation Verification: Observations or inspections that confirm the system or component has been installed in accordance with the contract documents and to industry accepted best practices.
56
Issues/Deficiency Log: A formal, ongoing record of problems or concerns and their resolution raised by members of NEBB Technical Commissioning or Retro-Commissioning Teams during the course of the their activity. Maintainability: A design component or construction layout that provides clearance for equipment or components to be effectively maintained. This includes adequate room for access to adjust and repair the equipment. Maintenance Management Work Order: Work order for building repairs or troubleshooting created from the owners maintenance management system or procedures. May: Indicates a course of action permissible as determined by the NEBB Certified Firm. NEBB BET Certified Firm: A firm that has met and maintains all the requirements of the National Environmental Balancing Bureau for firm certification in Building Envelope Testing and is currently certified by NEBB. A NEBB BET Certified Firm shall employ at least one NEBB BET Certified Professional in a full time management position. NEBB BET Certified Professional: A full time employee of the firm in a management position who has successfully passed the professional level written and practical qualification examinations and maintains the professional re-qualification requirements of NEBB. NEBB BSC Certified Firm: A firm that has met and maintains all the requirements of the National Environmental Balancing Bureau for firm certification in Building Systems Commissioning and is currently certified by NEBB. A NEBB Certified BSC Firm must employ at least one NEBB Certified BSC Professional in a full time management position. NEBB BSC Certified Professional: A full time employee of the firm in a management position who has successfully passed the Certified Professional level examinations and other requirements, and maintains the Certified Professional re-qualification requirements of NEBB. NEBB Certified BET Report: The data presented in a NEBB Certified BET Report accurately represents system measurements obtained in accordance with the current edition of the NEBB Procedural Standards for Building Envelope Testing. A NEBB Certified BET Report does not necessarily guarantee that systems measured conform to the design requirements or stated guidelines. The report is an accurate representation of the measured results only. NEBB Certified BSC Report: The final report of the project commissioning process. The commissioning report includes all testing data results, issue logs, observations and other pertinent data to the commissioning process. NEBB Certification indicates that the commissioning process and the report have been completed and compiled in accordance with the current edition of the NEBB Procedural Standards for Building Systems Commissioning. Normative Appendices - The normative appendices to NEBB Procedural Standards are considered to be integral parts of the mandatory requirements of the Procedural Standards, which, for reasons of convenience, are placed apart from all other normative elements. Owners Project Requirements (OPR): A written document that details the project requirements and the expectations of how it will be used and operated. These include project goals, measurable performance criteria, cost considerations, benchmarks, success criteria, and supporting information.
57
Performance Verification: 1. Verifying a facilities comfort level, energy usage or water usage performance as compared to a previous set of readings or verifications. 2. Activities performed during the Post Occupancy Phase of a NEBB Commissioning project. Phase: A group of activities that outline the courses of action necessary to complete that group of activities Process: A quality focused approach of clearly defined procedures for enhancing the of a project. The approach focuses upon verifying and documenting that the facility and systems, components, and assemblies are planned, designed, installed, tested, operated and maintained to meet the Owner's Project Requirements or Current Requirements. delivery all of its can be Facility
Point-to-Point Verification: This activity confirms a specific point device is paired and connected to the proper controller, that sensors are properly calibrated, actuators are ranged correctly and that graphic points are connected to the correct end device. Post Occupancy Phase: During this phase the NEBB CP will revisit the project and perform performance verification. This could include trend review, staff interviews, and functional testing. Potable Water: Water that is satisfactory for drinking, culinary, and domestic purposes and that meets the requirements of the Health Authority Having Jurisdiction. Pre-Design Phase Commissioning: Commissioning tasks performed prior to the start of design activities that include project programming and the development of the commissioning activities for the project. Pre-Functional Test (PFT): There are several types of HVAC PFTs that are performed during the construction phase prior to Functional Performance Testing. These include installation verification tests, static tests, and equipment startup tests. Procedure: A defined approach that outlines the execution of a sequence of work or operations. Procedures are used to produce repeatable and defined results. Rainwater: Natural precipitation not contaminated by use. Range: The upper and lower limits of an instruments ability to measure values for which the instrument is calibrated. Reclaimed (recycled) water: Non-potable water provided by a water/wastewater utility that, as a result of tertiary treatment of domestic wastewater, meets requirements of the public health Authority Having Jurisdiction for its reclaimed (recycled) water shall be approved by the public health Authority Having Jurisdiction. Resolution: 1. The smallest change in a measured variable that an instrument can detect. 2. The implementation of actions that correct a tested or observed deficiency.
58
Schematic Design (SD): A conceptual image of the project engineering requirements. Load calculations, preliminary system selection, and flow sheets are developed in this phase of the project. This phase typically represents the project at approximately 35% of the design effort. Shall: Indicates mandatory requirements to be followed in order for the project to become a NEBB certified project. Work must conform to these standards and procedures and no deviation is permitted. Note: In the event unique circumstances prevent a required action from being fulfilled, a notation shall be included in the report explaining the reason the requirement was not completed. For example, such notation could be: Not Available, Not Applicable, or Not Accessible. The simple notation N/A without definition is not allowed. Should: Indicate a certain course of action is preferred but not necessarily required. Site Observation Report: A report of periodic site inspections and observations made by the CP. Observation reports are intended to identify installation issues/deficiencies requiring correction or analysis. Special System Inspections: Inspections required by a local code Authority Having Jurisdiction prior to occupancy and are not normally a part of the commissioning process. Standard: A required qualification, action, or result. Standard Operating Procedure (SOP): 1. An internal policy prepared by the Certified Firm or prepared by the Owner. Procedures are written to provide guidance, direction, and step-by-step details relating to issues such as safety, testing protocols, acceptance criteria, etc. Use NEBB Certified Firm SOP in absence of SOP prepared by the Owner. 2. Established procedure to be followed in carrying out a given operation or in a given situation. Start Up Test: Test that validates the component or system is ready for automatic operation in accordance with manufacturer requirements. Static Test: Test or inspection that validates a specified static condition such as pressure testing. Static tests may be specification or code initiated. Systems Manual: A system-focused composite document that includes all information required for the owners operators to operate the systems. Technical Building Systems Commissioning (BSC): process. NEBB technical commissioning
Technical Commissioning (BSC): The NEBB Commissioning Certification program. Commissioning is the process of verifying the performance of a building utilizing various procedures. Test Procedure: A written protocol that defines methods, personnel, and expectations for tests conducted on components, equipment, assemblies, systems, and interfaces among systems. Test Zone: A building, or a portion of a building, configured as a single zone. For detached dwellings, the test zone envelope normally comprises the thermal envelope.
59
Testing: The use of specialized and calibrated instruments to measure parameters such as temperature, pressure, vapor flow, airflow, fluid flow, fluid quantities, rotational speed, electrical characteristics, velocity, sound and vibration level, air and hydronic quantities, and other data in order to determine performance, operation, or function. Testing, Adjusting, and Balancing (TAB): A systematic process or service applied to heating, ventilating and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems, and other environmental systems, to achieve and document air and hydronic flow rates. The standards and procedures for providing these services are referred to as Testing, Adjusting, and Balancing described in NEBB Procedural Standards for the Testing, Adjusting and Balancing of Environmental Systems. Thermal Scan: Thermographic picture taken with an Infrared Thermographic Camera. Thermographic pictures show relative temperatures of objects and surfaces and used to identify leaks, thermal bridging, thermal intrusion, electrical overload conditions, moisture containment, and insulation failure. Thermogram: A recorded image that maps the apparent temperature pattern of an object or scene into a corresponding contrast or color pattern. Training Plan: The document in outline form detailing subjects for operator training. Training agendas should address instruction on how to obtain service, operate, startup, shutdown, and maintain all systems and components of the project. Trending: The use of data loggers or DDC data trends to verify functional performance tests, troubleshoot, or document system performance. Troubleshooting: Procedural activities for investigating a specific fault or failure of a system or piece of equipment. Validation: 1. Documented evidence that a process or system, when operated within established parameters can perform effectively and reproducibly to produce a product meeting predetermined specifications and quality attributes. 2. A process where work is verified as complete and operating correctly. a. First party validation occurs when a firm or individual verifying the task is the same firm or individual performing the task. b. Second party validation occurs when the firm or individual verifying the task is under the control of the firm performing the task or has any possible financial conflicts of interest in the resolution (e.g. architects, designers, general contractors and third-tier subcontractors or vendors). c. Third party validation occurs when the firm verifying the task is not associated with, or under control of, the firm performing or designing the task. Verification: The process where specific documents, components, equipment, assemblies, systems, and interfaces among systems are confirmed to comply with criteria described in the Owners Project Requirements. Verification Checklists: are developed and used during all phases of the NEBB Commissioning and Retro-Commissioning process to verify the Owners Project Requirements (OPR) or Current Facility Requirements are being achieved.
60
Warranty Phase Commissioning: Commissioning efforts executed after a project has been completed and accepted by the Owner. Warranty Phase Commissioning includes follow-up on verification of system performance, measurement and verification tasks, and assistance in identifying warranty issues and enforcing warranty provisions of the construction contract. Warranty Visit: A commissioning meeting and site review where all outstanding warranty issues and deferred testing are reviewed and discussed. Wastewater (Sewage/Blackwater): Any liquid waste containing animal or vegetable matter in suspension or solution and that may include liquids containing chemicals in solution. Whole Building Commissioning: Commissioning of all building systems including Building Envelope, HVAC, Electrical, Special Electrical (Fire Alarm, Security & Communications), Plumbing and Fire Protection. Zone: A volume of building served by a single ventilation system. For buildings with natural ventilation only, the whole building is considered a zone.
61
APPENDICES
Normative Appendix C Instrumentation

NEBB Commissioning Instrumentation (IP Units)
Function Instrument Nomenclature
Airflow Multimeter Air Velocity Digital Analog Air Velocity Air Velocity Array-type Grid or Airfoil Probe Rotating Vane Anemometer (Analog/Digital) Direct Reading Hood (Digital) Direct Reading Hood (Analog) Hydrometer (Digital) Hydrometer (Digital) Hygrometer (Digital) Manometer (Digital) Pitot Tube 100 to 2,000 CFM NA 5% of reading, 5 CFM 5% of reading, 5 CFM NA 50 - 2500 FPM 100 to 2,000 CFM 5% of reading 5% of reading 5 CFM 5% of reading 5 CFM Digital: 1.0 CFM 200 CFM scale: 5 CFM 250 - 500 CFM scale: 10 CFM 1000 scale: 20 CFM 2000 scale: 50 CFM 0.5 psi 1.0 psi 2.5 psi 1.0 inches WG 1.0 feet WG 1% 0.01 in WG 1 inches WG 10.0 in WG > 1 inches WG NA 5 RPM 12 months 20 FPM 1 CFM 12 months 5 CFM NA 12 months
Minimum Range
Accuracy
Resolution
Calibration Interval
HVAC Cx Instruments (Certification Requirement)
Air CFM (1 Required either digital or analog)
100 to 2,000 CFM -30 inches hg to 60 psi 0 to 100 psi 0 to 200 psi 0 to 100 inches WG 0 to 100 feet WG 10 to 90% RH 0 to 10 inches WG 18 inches minimum
12 months
Hydronic Differential Pressure Hydronic Differential Pressure Relative Humidity Air Differential Pressure Velocity Pressure Rotational Speed
2% of reading 2% of reading 2% RH 2% of reading NA 2% of reading
12 months 12 months 12 months 12 months NA 12 months
Temperature
Amps and Volts Measurement Digital Camera
Tachometer Rotational Speed 0 to 5,000 RPM Dual Function (Digital or Analog) Thermometer (Digital or Analog) Air -40F to 240F Immersion -40F to 240F Contact -40F to 240F True RMS Multimeter 0 to 600 VAC Digital 0 to 100 Amps Digital NA
1% of reading 1% of reading 1% of reading 2% of reading 2% of reading 3 x Zoom
0.2F 0.2F 0.2F 1.0 Volt 0.1 Amp 12.0 Mega Pixels Min
12 months
12 months NA
Building Envelope Cx Instruments (Required for Certification only if performing Envelope Cx) Thermal Image Camera Capacitance Moisture Meter Temperature Measurement % Moisture Min. focus distance: 18 in Field of view : 23 x 17 0-100% Accuracy: 2C or 2% NA Thermal Sensitivity: 0.05C at 30C target temp. (50 mK) NA Note 3 Note 3
62

Receptacle Circuit Tester Voltage Detector Light Level Meter
APPENDICES
Accuracy Resolution Calibration Interval
NA NA Note 3
Minimum Range
Electrical Cx Instruments (Required for Certification only if performing Electrical Cx) Receptacle Tester Voltage Light Level 125VAC 50 1,000 VAC 0 - 4,000 FC NA NA +-4% NA NA 1 FC
Special Electrical Cx Instruments (Required for Certification only if performing Special Electrical Cx) Sound Level 1. 2. 3. Meets Type 1 or Type 2 requirements specified in the current version of ANSI S1.4 American National Standard Specification for Sound Level Note 3 Meters Instrumentation with multiple capabilities shall be accepted for more than one function when submitting documentation for a f irms certification, providing that each separate function meets NEBB requirements Calibrations of all instrumentation requiring calibration shall be traceable to current NIST Standards for US firms, or equivalent organizations in other countries Calibration as per manufacturers requirements Sound Level Meter
63
APPENDICES
NEBB Commissioning Instrumentation (SI Units)

Airflow Multimeter Air Velocity Digital Analog Air Velocity Air Velocity Array-type Grid or Airfoil Probe Rotating Vane Anemometer (Analog/Digital) Direct Reading Hood (Digital) Direct Reading Hood (Analog) Hydrometer (Digital) Hydrometer (Digital) Hygrometer (Digital) Manometer (Digital) Pitot Tube 50 to 950 L/Sec NA 5% of reading, 142 L/Sec 5% of reading, 142 L/Sec NA 0.254 12.7 M/Sec 50 to 950 L/Sec 5% of reading 5% of reading 142 L/Sec 5% of reading, 142 L/Sec Digital: 28 L/Sec Low scale: 2.4 L/Sec 250 scale: 4.7 L/Sec 500 scale: 9.4 L/Sec 1000 scale: 25.6 L/Sec 3.5 KPA 6.9 KPA 17.2 KPA 249 PA 3 KPA 1% 2.49 PA 249 PA 2.49 KPA > 249 PA NA 5 RPM 12 months 0.102 M/Sec 28 L/Sec 12 months 142 L/Sec NA 12 months
Minimum Range
Accuracy
Resolution
HVAC Cx Instruments (Certification Requirement)
Air CFM (1 Required either digital or analog) Hydronic Differential Pressure Hydronic Differential Pressure Relative Humidity Air Differential Pressure Velocity Pressure Rotational Speed
50 to 950 L/Sec -30PA to 420 KPA 0 to 690 KPA 0 to 690 KPA 0 to 25 KPA 0 to 100 300 KPA 10 to 90% RH 0 to 2.5 KPA 18 inches minimum
12 months
2% of reading 2% of reading 2% RH 2% of reading NA 2% of reading
12 months 12 months 12 months 12 months NA 12 months
Temperature
Amps and Volts Measurement Digital Camera
Tachometer Rotational Speed 0 to 5,000 RPM Dual Function (Digital or Analog) Thermometer (Digital or Analog) -40C to 115C Air Immersion -40C to 115C Contact -40C to 115C True RMS Multimeter 0 to 600 VAC Digital 0 to 100 Amps Digital NA
1% of reading 1% of reading 1% of reading 2% of reading 2% of reading 3 x Zoom
0.1C 0.1C 0.1C 1.0 Volt 0.1 Amp 12.0 Mega Pixels Min
12 months
12 months NA
Building Envelope Cx Instruments (Required for Certification only if performing Envelope Cx) Thermal Image Camera Capacitance Moisture Meter Temperature Measurement % Moisture Min. focus distance: 45 CM Field of view : 23 x 17 0-100% Accuracy: 2C or 2% NA Thermal Sensitivity: 0.05C at 30C target temp. (50 mK) NA Note 3 Note 3
64
APPENDICES
Function
Instrument Nomenclature
Receptacle Circuit Tester Voltage Detector Light Level Meter
Minimum Range
Accuracy
Resolution
NA NA Note 3
Electrical Cx Instruments (Required for Certification only if performing Electrical Cx) Receptacle Tester Voltage Light Level 125VAC 50 1,000 VAC 0 - 40,000 Lux NA NA +-4% NA NA 1 FC
Special Electrical Cx Instruments (Required for Certification only if performing Special Electrical Cx) Sound Level 4. 5. 6. Meets Type 1 or Type 2 requirements specified in the current version of ANSI S1.4 American National Standard Specification for Sound Level Note 3 Meters Instrumentation with multiple capabilities shall be accepted for more than one function when submitting documentation for a firms certification, providing that each separate function meets NEBB requirements Calibrations of all instrumentation requiring calibration shall be traceable to current NIST Standards for US firms, or equivalent organizations in other countries Calibration as per manufacturers requirements Sound Level Meter
65
APPENDICES
66

BSC - PS - 3 26 13

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

BSC - PS - 3 26 13

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

BSC - PS - 3 26 13

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PROCEDURAL STANDARDS FOR WHOLE BUILDING SYSTEMS TECHNICAL COMMISSIONING

FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION

2013 FOURTH EDITION

National Environmental Balancing Bureau

Gaithersburg, Maryland 20877-4121 301-977-3698 301-977-9589 FAX www.nebb.org

PROCEDURAL STANDARDS FOR WHOLE BUILDING SYSTEMS COMMISSIONING

NEBB BSC PROCEDURAL STANDARD

NEBB BSC PROCEDURAL STANDARD

POST OCCUPANCY PHASE COMMISSIONING........................................................................... 26

SECTION 10 10.1 10.2 10.3

SECTION 11 COMMISSIONING OF FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS .............................................. 47 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................ 47

NEBB BSC PROCEDURAL STANDARD

NEBB BSC PROCEDURAL STANDARDS

SECTION 1 QUALITY CONTROL AND COMPLIANCE

SECTION 1 QUALITY CONFORMANCE

NEBB Quality Assurance Program CERTIFICATE

Quality Control and Compliance

NEBB BSC PROCEDURAL STANDARDS

SECTION 1 QUALITY CONTROL AND COMPLIANCE

Instrument and Equipment Use and Maintenance

NEBB BSC PROCEDURAL STANDARDS

SECTION 1 QUALITY CONTROL AND COMPLIANCE

1.10 Work Completion

1.11 Compilation and Submission of Final Commissioning Reports

NEBB BSC PROCEDURAL STANDARDS

It is recommended the Owner:

Design Professionals Responsibilities

It is recommended the design professionals:

NEBB BSC PROCEDURAL STANDARDS

The General Contractor, Subcontractors and their Vendors must provide:

NEBB BSC Certified Firm Responsibilities

The NEBB BSC Certified Firm must provide:

NEBB BSC PROCEDURAL STANDARDS

NEBB PROCEDURAL STANDARDS

SECTION 3 STANDARD FOR INSTRUMENTATION AND CALIBRATION

SECTION 3 STANDARDS FOR INSTRUMENTATION

Range and Accuracy

NEBB PROCEDURAL STANDARDS

SECTION 3 STANDARD FOR INSTRUMENTATION AND CALIBRATION

NEBB PROCEDURAL STANDARDS

SECTION 4 STANDARD FOR REPORTS

SECTION 4 STANDARDS FOR REPORTS

4.1.1 Report Title Page

4.1.2 Report Certification Page

NEBB PROCEDURAL STANDARDS

SECTION 4 STANDARD FOR REPORTS

4.1.3 Table of Contents Page

4.1.4 Executive Summary / Remarks

4.1.5 Commissioning Plan

4.1.6 Deliverables by Phase

NEBB PROCEDURAL STANDARDS

SECTION 4 STANDARD FOR REPORTS

4.1.7 Test Instrument Page

4.1.8 All Report Pages

NEBB BSC PROCEDURAL STANDARD

SECTION 5 TECHNICAL COMMISSIONING PROCESS

SECTION 5 THE TECHNICAL COMMISSIONING PROCESS

NEBB BSC PROCEDURAL STANDARD

SECTION 5 TECHNICAL COMMISSIONING PROCESS