Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2K views

    Magpul V Plinker Tactical Complaint

    Uploaded by

    Richard Johnson
    This is the initial complaint filed by Magpul against Plinker Arms (aka Plinker Tactical) regarding allegations of patent infringement on the production of AR-15 magazines.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Magpul V Plinker Tactical Complaint

    Uploaded by

    Richard Johnson
    2K views4 pages
    This is the initial complaint filed by Magpul against Plinker Arms (aka Plinker Tactical) regarding allegations of patent infringement on the production of AR-15 magazines.

    Original Title

    Magpul v Plinker Tactical Complaint

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This is the initial complaint filed by Magpul against Plinker Arms (aka Plinker Tactical) regarding allegations of patent infringement on the production of AR-15 magazines.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    2K views4 pages

    Magpul V Plinker Tactical Complaint

    Uploaded by

    Richard Johnson
    This is the initial complaint filed by Magpul against Plinker Arms (aka Plinker Tactical) regarding allegations of patent infringement on the production of AR-15 magazines.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 4

    Case 1:13-cv-01984-RBJ Document 1 Filed 07/25/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4 This document is public record.

    However, this copy was paid for by GunsHolstersAndGear.com Any links or credit for GunsHolstersAndGear.com would be appreciated. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No.

    MAGPUL INDUSTRIES, CORP., Plaintiff, v. PLINKER ARMS, LLC dba PLINKER TACTICAL, Defendant.

    COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

    PARTIES 1. Plaintiff Magpul Industries, Corp. (Plaintiff) is a Delaware corporation with its

    principal place of business located in Erie, Colorado. Plaintiffs business consists primarily of the design, manufacture and sale of products that are used as accessories to firearms. 2. Upon information and belief, Defendant Plinker Arms, LLC dba Plinker Tactical

    (Defendant) is a North Carolina limited liability company with its principal place of business at 18636 Starcreek Drive, Suite G, Cornelius, North Carolina 28031. Defendant has been selling and offering to sell infringing ammunition magazines within the United States, and within this District, all without consent from Plaintiff. Defendants infringing products include, but are not necessarily limited to, the AR 30-round polymer magazine.

    Case 1:13-cv-01984-RBJ Document 1 Filed 07/25/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4

    JURISDICTION 3. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction of this action under 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a)

    in that it arises under the United States Patent Laws. 4. Defendant is subject to this Courts specific and general personal jurisdiction because

    Defendant conducts business in this Judicial District, has committed the acts complained of in this Judicial District, and has caused injury to Plaintiff within this Judicial District by virtue of the acts of patent infringement that are described herein. 5. Venue is proper in this Judicial District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b), (c) and 1400(b).

    Defendant is transacting, doing and/or soliciting business and committing acts of patent infringement in this Judicial District and elsewhere in the United States. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION (Infringement of the 601 Patent) 6. Plaintiff incorporates by reference and realleges each of the allegations set forth in

    paragraphs 1-5 above. 7. On December 6, 2011, U.S. Patent No. 8,069,601 (the 601 Patent), entitled Ammunition

    Magazine, was issued for the invention of a novel ammunition magazine. Plaintiff has owned this patent throughout the period of Defendants infringing acts and still owns this patent. 8. Defendant has infringed and is still infringing the 601 Patent by making, selling, and using

    ammunition magazines that embody the patented invention, and Defendant will continue to do so unless enjoined by this court. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION (Infringement of the D293 Patent) 9. Plaintiff incorporates by reference and realleges each of the allegations set forth in

    paragraphs 1-5 above.

    Case 1:13-cv-01984-RBJ Document 1 Filed 07/25/13 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4

    10.

    On August 30, 2011, U.S. Patent No. D644,293 (the D293 Patent), entitled Magazine

    Follower, was issued for the invention of a novel design for a magazine follower. Plaintiff has owned this patent throughout the period of Defendants infringing acts and still owns this patent. 11. Defendant has infringed and is still infringing the D293 Patent by making, selling, and using

    magazine followers that embody the patented invention, and Defendant will continue to do so unless enjoined by this court. THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION (Infringement of the D545 Patent) 12. Plaintiff incorporates by reference and realleges each of the allegations set forth in

    paragraphs 1-5 above. 13. On July 27, 2010, U.S. Patent No. D620,545 (the D545 Patent), entitled Casing for an

    Ammunition Magazine for a Rifle, was issued for the invention of a novel design for a casing for an ammunition magazine for a rifle. Plaintiff has owned this patent throughout the period of Defendants infringing acts and still owns this patent. 14. Defendant has infringed and is still infringing the D545 Patent by making, selling, and using

    casings for ammunition magazines for rifles that embody the patented invention, and Defendant will continue to do so unless enjoined by this court. REQUEST FOR RELIEF Therefore, Plaintiff requests for judgment: 1. 2. That Defendant has infringed the 601, D293, and D545 Patents; That Plaintiff be awarded damages from patent infringement according to proof and

    ordering that such damages be multiplied up to treble their amount; 3. Preliminary and permanently enjoining Defendant and all others acting in concert with

    Defendant from making, using, selling, or offering to sell the infringing ammunition magazines, or any other product that infringes the 601, D293, and D545 Patents without permission or

    Case 1:13-cv-01984-RBJ Document 1 Filed 07/25/13 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4

    license from Plaintiff; 4. That Defendant be ordered to deliver up to Plaintiff all products infringing the 601,

    D293, and D545 Patents within its ownership, possession, or control for destruction by Plaintiff or, in the alternative, that the Court award a compulsory royalty for the current and future sale of such goods; 5. That the Court declare this to be an exceptional case pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285, and

    award reasonable attorneys fees; 6. That Plaintiff be awarded its costs of suit, and pre- and post-judgment interest on any

    money judgment; 7. For such other relief as the Court deems proper.

    Dated: July 25, 2013 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Brian E. Mitchell Brian E. Mitchell Brian E. Mitchell MITCHELL + COMPANY 4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1400 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 766-3515 Facsimile: (415) 402-0058 Email: brian.mitchell@mcolawoffices.com Louis P. Feuchtbaum Ellen P. Liu SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP One Embarcadero Center, Twenty-Second Floor San Francisco, California 94111-3711 Telephone: (415) 392-1960 Facsimile: (415) 392-0827 Email: lfeuchtbaum@sideman.com Attorneys for Plaintiff MAGPUL INDUSTRIES, CORP

    You might also like