Clinical Outcome in Children With Chronic Recurrent Multifocal Osteomyelitis
Clinical Outcome in Children With Chronic Recurrent Multifocal Osteomyelitis
Clinical Outcome in Children With Chronic Recurrent Multifocal Osteomyelitis
doi:10.1093/rheumatology/ken249
Introduction
Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO) is a noninfectious inflammatory bone disease of unknown aetiology, first reported by Giedion et al. in 1972 [1]. The disease causes multifocal lytic bone lesions with swelling and pain. It could be associated with the other symptoms of SAPHO syndrome (synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, osteitis) [2], or with sacroiliitis, psoriasis [3] and IBD [4]. The course of the disease is characterized by periodic exacerbations and remissions but longterm outcome remains unclear. Most of the studies in the literature are case reports or short series [3, 58]. Huber et al. [9] determined the long-term clinical outcome of 23 patients with CRMO. Most subjects had no disease activity or sequelae but 25% of patients had persistent disease. The aim of our study was to determine clinical outcome of children with CRMO.
1 General Pediatric Department, Saint-Vincent-de-Paul Hospital, Paris, 2General Pediatric Department, Saint-Jacques Hospital, Besanc on, 3Rheumatology 4 Department, Cochin Hospital, Pediatric Immunology and Haematology Department, Necker Hospital, 5General Pediatric Department, Robert Debre Hospital, Paris and 6Pediatric Department, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France.
<18 yrs at diagnosis; in 28 cases, a bone biopsy with microbial investigation was performed and excluded an infectious origin. A chronic non-bacterial osteitis was diagnosed when there was only one bony lesion during the course of the disease. A patient was defined as responder to treatment if there was absence of pain and improvement in inflammatory markers. Questionnaires were sent to assess disease activity and educational and vocational achievement. Disease activity was defined as the presence of pain or use of medical treatment. Pain was evaluated using a visual analogue scale of 0100. Patients were asked to indicate if they had received treatment, and to specify the drug. Global impact of the disease was determined with another visual analogue scale graduated from 0 to 100. Physical function was assessed using the HAQ including eight domains: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activity. The final score ranged from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability). Educational achievement was evaluated by the highest educational level reached and vocational achievement by asking about employment. Oral consent was obtained from the parents and, when possible, the patients, as recommended in France. In accordance with the French rules, no ethical committee agreement was needed before sending the questionnaire to the patient or the parents. The Pearson correlation was used in a first analysis to determine as to which parameters were correlated with the duration of active disease and with the response to NSAIDs. Then a multivariate regression was used to construct a multivariate model for the duration of active disease including biological parameters (ESR, CRP, platelets, white blood cells), age at the onset, sex, initial and total number of bony lesions and response to NSAID treatment. The logistic regression was used to construct a model for the response to NSAID treatment including the same parameters.
Results
Forty patients were evaluated (34 females and 6 males) with a median age of 10 yrs (range 117) at first symptoms. There was statistically no difference between the male and female patients with regard to demographic and clinical data (age at disease onset,
1397
Submitted 21 November 2007; revised version accepted 9 June 2008. diatrie Ge ne rale, Centre Correspondence to: C. Catalano-Pons, Service de Pe hospitalier dAvignon, 305, rue Raoul Follereau, 84902 Avignon cedex 9, France. E-mail: chacatalano@yahoo.fr.
The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
initial and total number of lesions, biological parameters, percentage of response to NSAIDs and duration of active disease). Median age at diagnosis was 11.5 yrs (range 217). Initial symptoms were bony pain in all patients, associated with localized swelling and arthritis secondary to local bony inflammation in four children. Three patients suffered from enthesitis, two at onset of the disease and one during the disease course. Nine patients had fever and one pustulosis plantaris. Biological evaluation at onset of the disease usually showed normal white blood cell count, haemoglobin and platelet count and slightly increased inflammatory markers with a median value of ESR of 26 mm/1st h and of CRP of 5 mg/l (ref <5 mg/l). Median number of initial bony lesions for each patient was 2 (range 17) at onset and 3.5 (range 111) during the disease course. Fifteen patients (37.5%) had only one bone lesion at onset of the disease and four patients (10%) had a unifocal course. The sites affected are summarized in Table 1. Twenty-eight children underwent bone biopsies that showed non-specific subacute or chronic inflammation with mild fibrosis. Microbial investigations remained negative. All patients except one were initially treaCRPNSAI.(2)]TJ-1.1128-1.1318TDEl(fenat)-549.6(patients)5731.receatiCRP ti7(btictis,)-548.1(Nine)4744.3(rtic
Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis Involvement of the clavicle has classically been described [11], but was found in only 20% of our patients, as reported in other studies [7, 9]. Bone biopsy was only performed when diagnosis was uncertain and showed non-specific chronic inflammation, as described by Girschick et al. [8]. As in SAPHO syndrome, NSAIDs are usually effective with a response in up to 80% of the cases [3, 12]. The fraction of good responders has been probably overstated because inflammatory markers were usually only slightly increased and the patients pain evaluation was rather good despite the persistence of the disease. In our study, they were used in almost all cases, with 73% responders. Corticosteroids can be used for severe relapsing cases with a very high response rate [13, 14]. In a small number of patients, improvement has been observed after treatment with SSZ, MTX, colchicine [9], IFN- [15], IFN- [16], bisphosphonates [17, 18] and infliximab [4, 19]. Although the early literature suggested that CRMO is a selflimiting condition without sequelae, more recent studies have found that symptoms can be prolonged. Some cases that remained active for many years have been reported [11]. In this study, median duration of active disease was 2.7 yrs with a median time since diagnosis of 3.5 yrs. More than half of the patients had active disease at follow-up, continued to have pain and considered that CRMO had global consequencies on their life. In their review of the literature, Schultz et al. [3] reported data similar to ours, with similar median duration from diagnosis to remission (2 yrs) and similar median time from onset of illness to last follow-up (3.5 yrs). In Hubers study, median overall duration of active disease was 5.7 yrs. More than 25% of the patients had persistent CRMO activity at the time of evaluation, a median of 12.4 yrs later [9]. In comparison with our study in which 20% of the patients had physical sequelae, only 7% of patients in Schultz et al.s review [3] had long-term sequelae such as growth retardation, bone deformities, kyphosis and thoracic outlet syndrome. This may be due to a recruitment bias because all of our patients were referred to tertiary care hospitals and were therefore likely to be more severely affected. Duffy et al. [20] also found a high rate of orthopaedic complications at maturity in a cohort of 12 adults, including deformities in seven patients and leg-length inequality in five patients, requiring surgery in one. Huber et al. [9] confirmed those results with nearly half of the cohort suffering from bone deformities. In spite of this significant morbidity associated with CRMO, only 3 patients out of 29 had moderate or severe disability when measured by the HAQ. CRMO had interfered with patients education in only two cases, and no patient felt that CRMO had affected their ability to obtain a job. In Huber et al.s [9] long-term follow-up (median time since diagnosis of 13 yrs), 78% of subjects had HAQ scores of 0, indicating no or minimal impairment of physical function; in our study with a median time since diagnosis of 3.5 yrs, an HAQ of 0 was present in 59% of the cases. In Huber et al.s [9] study, impairments were seen in all domains of measurement of a quality-of-life test, but appeared more frequently in non-physical aspects of health. CRMO had affected education for seven patients out of 23 and the ability to work in three patients. Very few studies have analysed predictive factors for persistent evolution of CRMO. Girschick et al. [12] showed that there was no significant difference in the duration of NSAID treatment between the unifocal and multifocal forms. In our study, we showed that young patients at the onset of the disease with a high number of bony sites seemed to be at risk for persistent disease. Moreover, a high number of bony sites at the onset was also a risk factor for a poor response to NSAIDs. Sex and biological parameters did not seem to influence the evolution or the response to the treatment. However, our group of patients is rather small and these results have to be confirmed by larger series.
1399
Despite this fact, we must underline that we were able to gather information on the majority (72.5%) of the patients, which is a high rate of response for such type of study. In conclusion, our study suggests that clinical outcome of children with CRMO is generally good, but a sizeable proportion of patients have active disease at follow-up, and a minority of patients can have a severe and prolonged disease course despite intensive treatments. Further studies are required to confirm the risk factors for severe and persistent disease, and then to treat those patients more aggressively in order to prevent a poor longterm outcome.
References
1 Giedion A, Holthusen W, Masel LF, Vischer D. Subacute and chronic symmetrical osteomyelitis. Ann Radiol 1972;15:32942. 2 Beretta-Piccoli BC, Sauvin MJ, Gal I et al. Synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, osteitis (SAPHO) syndrome in childhood: a report of ten cases and review of the literature. Eur J Pediatr 2000;159:594601. 3 Schultz C, Holterhus PM, Seidel A et al. Chronic recurrent osteomyelitis in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1999;18:100813. 4 Carpenter E, Jackson MA, Friesen CA, Scarbrough M, Roberts CC. Crohnsassociated chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis responsive to infliximab. J Pediatr 2004;144:5414. 5 Quelquejay C, Job-Deslandre C, Hamidou A, Benosman A, Adamsbaum C. Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis in children. J Radiol 1997;78:11521. 6 Coinde E, David L, Cottalorda J et al. Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis in children: report of 17 cases. Arch Pediatr 2001;8:57783. 7 Job-Deslandre C, Krebs S, Kahan A. Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis: five-year outcomes in 14 pediatric cases. Joint Bone Spine 2001;68:24551. 8 Girschick HJ, Raab P, Surbaum S et al. Chronic non-bacterial osteomyelitis in children. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:27985. 9 Huber AM, Lam PY, Duffy CM et al. Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis: clinical outcomes after more than five years of follow-up. J Pediatr 2002;141:198203. 10 Brown T, Wilkinson RH. Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis. Radiology 1988;166:4936. 11 Jurik AG, Helmig O, Ternowitz T, Moller BN. Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis: a follow-up study. J Pediatr Orthop 1988;8:4958. 12 Girschick HJ, Krauspe R, Tschammler A, Huppertz HI. Chronic recurrent osteomyelitis with clavicular involvement in children: diagnostic value of different imaging techniques and therapy with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Eur J Pediatr 1998;157:2833. 13 Ishikawa-Nakayama K, Sugiyama E, Sawazaki S et al. Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis showing marked improvement with corticosteroid treatment. J Rheumatol 2000;27:13189. 14 Holden W, David J. Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis: two cases of sacral disease responsive to corticosteroids. Clin Infect Dis 2005;40:6169. 15 Gallagher KT, Roberts RL, MacFarlane JA, Stiehm ER. Treatment of chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis with interferon gamma. J Pediatr 1997;131:4702. 16 Andersson R. Effective treatment with interferon alpha in chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis. J Interferon Cytokine Res 1995;15:8378. 17 Seibel MJ, Farahmand I, Zeigler R. Successful treatment of chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO) with intravenous bisphosphonates: a case report. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 1999;107:115. 18 Guignard S, Job-Deslandre C, Sayag-Boukris V, Kahan A. Therapeutic use of pamidronate in SAPHO syndrome. Joint Bone Spine 2002;69:3926. 19 Deutschmann A, Mache CJ, Bodo K, Zebedin D, Ring E. Successful treatment of chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis with tumor necrosis factor alpha-blockage. Pediatrics 2005;116:12313. 20 Duffy CM, Lam PY, Ditchfield M, Allen R, Graham HK. Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis: review of orthopaedic complications at maturity. J Pediatr Orthop 2002;22:5015.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.