Ymbong Vs ABS CBN

ERNESTO G. YMBONG, petitioner, vs. ABS-CBN BROADCASTING CORPORATION, VENERANDA SY AND DANTE LUZON, respondents.
Labor Law; Termination of Employment; Resignation; Although 11(b) of R.A. No. 6646 does not require mass media commentators and announcers such as private respondent to resign from their radio or TV stations but only to go on leave for the duration of the campaign period, we think that the company may nevertheless validly require them to resign as a matter of policy.This is not the first time that this Court has dealt with a policy similar to Policy No. HR-ER-016. In the case of Manila Broadcasting Company v. NLRC, 294 SCRA 486 (1998), this Court ruled: What is involved in this case is an unwritten company policy considering any employee who files a certificate of candidacy for any elective or local office as resigned from the company. Although 11(b) of R.A. No. 6646 does not require mass media commentators and announcers such as private respondent to resign from their radio or TV stations but only to go on leave for the duration of the campaign period, we think that the company may nevertheless validly require them to resign as a matter of policy. In this case, the policy is justified on the following grounds: Working for the government and the company at the same time is clearly disadvantageous and prejudicial to the rights and interest not only of the company but the public as well. In the event an employee wins in an election, he cannot fully serve, as he is expected to do, the interest of his employer. The employee has to serve two (2) employers, obviously detrimental to the interest of both the government and the private employer. In the event the employee loses in the election, the impartiality and cold neutrality of an employee as broadcast personality is suspect, thus readily eroding and adversely affecting the confidence and trust of the listening public to employers station. Same; Same; Management Prerogative; So long as a companys management prerogatives are exercised in good faith for the advancement of the employers interest and not for the purpose of defeating or circumventing the rights of the employees under special laws or under valid agreements, the Supreme Court will uphold them. We have consistently held that so long as a companys management prerogatives are exercised in good faith for the advancement of the employers interest and not for the purpose of defeating or circumventing the rights of the employees under special laws or under valid agreements, this Court will uphold them. In the instant case, ABS-CBN validly justified the implementation of Policy No. HR-ER-016. It is well within its rights to ensure that it maintains its objectivity and credibility and freeing itself from any appearance of impartiality so that the confidence of the viewing and listening public in it will not be in any way eroded. Even as the law is solicitous of the welfare of the employees, it must also protect the right of an employer to exercise what are clearly management prerogatives. The free will of management to conduct its own business affairs to achieve its purpose cannot be denied
Same; Same; Ymbongs overt act of running for councilor of Lapu-Lapu City is tantamount to resignation on his part. He was separated from ABS-CBN not because he was dismissed but because he resigned.As Policy No. HR-ER-016 is the subsisting company policy and not Luzons March 25, 1998 Memorandum, Ymbong is deemed resigned when he ran for councilor. We find no merit in Ymbongs argument that [his] automatic termination x x x was a blatant [disregard] of [his] right to due process as he was never asked to explain why he did not tender his resignation before he ran for public office as mandated by [the subject company policy]. Ymbongs overt act of running for councilor of Lapu-Lapu City is tantamount to resignation on his part. He was separated from ABS-CBN not because he was dismissed but because he resigned. Since there was no termination to speak of, the requirement of due process in dismissal cases cannot be applied to Ymbong. Thus, ABS-CBN is not duty-bound to ask him to explain why he did not tender his resignation before he ran for public office as mandated by the subject company policy.

Ymbong Vs ABS CBN

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ymbong Vs ABS CBN

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ymbong Vs ABS CBN

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ERNESTO G. YMBONG, petitioner, vs. ABS-CBN BROADCASTING CORPORATION, VENERANDA SY AND DANTE LUZON, respondents.

You might also like