Preliminary Design of A Stainless Steel Helium Tank and Its Associated Cold Tuning System For 700 MHZ SCRF Cavities For Proton
Preliminary Design of A Stainless Steel Helium Tank and Its Associated Cold Tuning System For 700 MHZ SCRF Cavities For Proton
Preliminary Design of A Stainless Steel Helium Tank and Its Associated Cold Tuning System For 700 MHZ SCRF Cavities For Proton
PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF A STAINLESS STEEL HELIUM TANK AND ITS ASSOCIATED COLD TUNING SYSTEM FOR 700 MHZ SCRF CAVITIES FOR PROTON.
H. Saugnac, S. Rousselot, C. Commeaux, H. Gassot, T. Junquera, Institut de Physique Nuclaire Orsay, 91406 cedex, France P. Bosland, H. Safa, CEA Saclay/DAPNIA/SEA, Gif-sur-Yvette, 91191 cedex, France Abstract
For the R&D program on 700 MHz SCRF cavities for proton, we study the helium tank attached to a 5-cells cavity and its cold tuning system. Our work is orientated to a stainless steel helium tank, mainly for cost reduction. We present in this paper preliminary tests and results giving good arguments on the feasibility of a stainless steel helium tank brazed on the cavity cut off. Then we describe the helium tank design and the mechanical cold tuning system based on the Soleil principle designed at CEA Saclay. either great thermal stresses on the cavity, either a large stroke for the CTS. Further more the technological feasibility of this solution remains to be proven. The paper describes preliminary tests on the feasibility of a SS helium tank, the design of the helium tank and the Cold tuning system.
2 PRELIMINARY TESTS
Brazing a stainless steel helium tank on the niobium cavity cut off stands several technological difficulties. A first optimistic foreground was given by the CERCA French company who brazed with copper stainless steel CF flanges on some cavities cut off of the former APT project. Several tests and simulations were performed on various technological aspects and consequences of using SS helium tank. In the case of the helium tank, super fluid helium is directly in contact with the brazed interface which would emphasis the gaseous flux inside the cryostat insulation vacuum in case of leaks. This risk of leak is improved by the great thermal hoop stresses taking place at cool down between SS and Niobium. A first experiment was stand to verify the tightness of the brazing on a mock up at super fluid helium.
Niobium Ep 4.2 mm 304 L
1 INTRODUCTION
The purpose of the paper concerns the whole mechanical structure composed by the cavity, the helium tank and the cold tuning system (CTS). These elements, as shown below, are strongly connected in term of mechanical design as the helium tank gives, associated with the cold tuning system (CTS) , a parallel stiffness to the cavity. This stiffness is linked to several cavity characteristics as cavity stiffness, static Lorentz forces and the CTS stiffness and mechanical resolution.
Cold tuning system Helium tank
Stepping motor
Decoupling bellow
77.8
120
Figure 1 Principle layout of the cavity cold tuning The compensating bellow, decouples the cavity to the rest of the structure allowing the CTS to pull or push the cavity. Therefore the frequency shift caused by the lorentz longitudinal component forces depends on the stiffness of the CTS/Helium tank ensemble. In our case the use of Stainless Steel (SS), instead of titanium, for the helium tank and the CTS reduces considerably the manufacturing costs. The draw back is
Figure 2 Niobium / SS Mock-up This mock up consists in a Niobium tube where stainless flanges are brazed at extremities. There is similarity of the maximal thermal stresses at the brazing area between the mock up and the final design of the tank which are respectively about 150, 80, 60 N/mm2 for the Niobium tube, the copper interface (70 m thick) and the SS flange.
540
3.1
The parameters presented below were calculated for a 5 cell 700 MHz cavity [1]. Longitudinal frequency sensitivity ~ 250 kHz/mm f/l ~ 1592 N/mm Longitudinal cavity stiffness F/l Band width for Ip ~ 20 mA ~ 500 Hz f 13.86 N Static longitudinal Lorentz Force F Lorentz Thermal differential contraction ~ 1.6 mm/m @ 4 K L Helium Tank L cavity Frequency shift due to cool down To be measured f CD ~ 300 kHz Incertainity on f CD Arbitrarily set !! CD Table 1 : Cavity tuning parameters Several design numbers can be evaluated : - The mechanical resolution of the CTS is taken as
25 f = 25 Hz > 0.1m f 20 l
- The frequency shift caused by the static lorentz force must be inside the bandwidth. It means that the stiffness of the Helium tank CTS ensemble should be : F f K tan k + CTS > Lorentz 7000 N / mm l f - When acting the CTS a part of the deformation goes to the helium tank and the CTS parts. We want to have 90 % at least of the CTS displacement going to the cavity : F l > 15000 N / mm K
tan k + CTS
90%
3 MECHANICAL TUNING
As said above the CTS and helium tank designs are subjected to cavity mechanical parameters. This parameters are also needed to set up the fundamental frequency the cavity must have before cool down.
- The design value taken for the helium tank / CTS stiffness is k tan k / SAF 20000 N / mm
3.2
Warm frequency
The different fabrication steps of the cavity modify its fundamental frequency [2] ( fabrication incertainities, chemical preparation). The warm tuning ( field flatness adjustment ) being the last process affecting the cavity shape is used to adjust the frequency to the good value. This value is connected to the frequency shift during cool down and the maximal range of the CTS. The CTS can operate in only one direction (pulling or pushing) to avoid discontinuity of the motors steps
541
The CTS is not attached to the cavity during cool down. The cavity contracts freely at 2 K and receive no thermal stresses. fW fC f0
pushing or pulling on the cavity. In this case the CTS only stretch the cavity. fW corresponds to a pre stress applied at 300 K by the CTS to limit the compression stress on the cavity at 2 K. The warm frequency before cool down is then :
f w = f 0 ( f CD + CD 2 f + ( l tan k l cav ) l
+ f Lorentz ) fW
l < 1.3mm f
Maximal
lTank lcav f w
cavity
l < 1.6mm f
Here the CTS must recover the differential thermal contraction between the tank and the cavity before stretching the cavity to its target frequency. Its maximal range is then :
( CD + f Lorentz ) l + lTank lcav < 3mm f
l < 1.3mm f
This case facilitate the fixture conception of the CTS on the rest of the structure but high stresses may appear on the cavity walls (~ 25 N/mm2) and on the CTS. The reproducibility of the frequency after cool down depends here on the dimensional tolerance of the CTS which would cause more scattering from one equipped cavity to the other. On the other hand the stroke of the CTS is low, about 1.3 mm. CASE 2
For this case the structure receive no longitudinal thermal stress and the cold frequency fC depends only on the cavities shape dispersion. The back draw is the more complicated conception of the CTS fixture and a greater required stroke.
5 2 1 4 6
3 7
542
Figure 6 CTS Principle layout We also give us the ability to insert in this system piezo electric actuators to achieve finer resolution and dynamic tuning for possible pulsed beam operations. The CTS principle used was designed at CEA Saclay for the SOLEIL project [4]. It is typically constituted of a cold stepping motor (1) with 200 steps by turn associated with a gear reduction of ratio r = 1 : 50 . The engine torque and rotation (Cm and m) are transmitted to a screw /bolt mechanism (2) with a thread p. The two arms (3) rotate around the axis (4), loading symmetrically the beam tube flange (8) and the helium tank (7) with eccentric rods (6). The lever arm has a ratio h given by the length of the arms (3) and the eccentricity of the rods (6) : h=D/d. The cinematic and static relations are : 2 p h r Cm dxCTS = m and FCTS = p r 2h and : dxcav = dxCTS FCTS
1 kCTS / tan k
Possible position of piezo actuators Helium tank Stepping motor & gear reduction
6 4 6 1 3 5 4 3 6 2
Screw
543
6 SUMMARY
The design of a 5 cell = 0.65 700 MHz SCRF cavity helium tank and its associated Cold Tuning System have been described. The feasibility of the use of Stainless Steel for the helium tank is to be proven with the test of an equipped mono cell in the horizontal CRYHOLAB cryostat before the end of the year. In parallel the CTS is to be manufactured and efforts on the characterization and use of piezo actuators at 2 K are performed.
7 REFERENCES
[1] Effets des forces de Lorentz et systeme daccord en frquence pour des cavits proton rapport IPNO : H.Gassot, H.Saugnac, T. Junquera, JL. Biarrotte [2] TESLA Test Facility : Cold Tuning System TESLA Report : Ph. Leconte, O. Clou, J. Gastebois, M. Maurier [3] TESLA Test Facility : Helium Tank TESLA Report : Ph. Leconte, R. Duthil, M. Maurier [4] Principe du systeme daccord des cavits SOLEIL CE Saclay internal Report : P. Bosland, M. Juillard, M. Maurier, A. Mosnier, G. Perilhous
544