Birthmarks Identificationandmx201205ryan
Birthmarks Identificationandmx201205ryan
Birthmarks Identificationandmx201205ryan
Birthmarks
Emma Ryan Lachlan Warren
Background
Birthmarks are common in newborns, and their presence can cause much anxiety in new parents.
Objective
This article provides an update on common birthmarks and identifies those complex subtypes that may indicate potentially important associations or outcomes.
Birthmarks present at birth or soon after are a source of parental anxiety. This article focuses on common birthmarks seen by primary care physicians, helps identify patients requiring specific intervention, and explores recent developments in management.
Vascular birthmarks
When a patient presents with a vascular birthmark it is important to distinguish between a vascular tumour and a vascular malformation as this will predict outcomes and guide treatment. The Mulliken and Glowacki classification provides a framework to assist in differentiating vascular lesions (Table 1).1
Discussion
Birthmarks encompass a range of lesions presenting at birth or soon after. They can be divided into vascular, epidermal, pigmented and other subtypes. This article focuses on common birthmarks to help identify patients requiring specific intervention and explores recent developments in management. A minority of higher risk birthmarks have complications or systemic associations that need identification and further management. Birthmarks are common, and in most cases parents can be reassured they are only of cosmetic significance and that the appearance will improve over time.
Naevus simplex
Naevus simplex, colloquially known as salmon patch and stork mark, are pale-pink to bright-red capillary vascular malformations with indistinct borders that blanch and become more prominent with crying and straining. Naevus simplex most commonly affects the forehead, glabella, upper eyelids and nape; most spontaneously disappear between the ages of 1 and 3 years.2 Naevus simplex are thought to be related to immaturity of the vasculature and have a prevalence of 2060%. Treatment is usually not required.2
Keywords
naevus/congenital; haemangioma/congenital; skin neoplasms/ congenital; infant, newborn
274 Reprinted from AUstralian FamilY PHYsiCian VOl. 41, NO. 5, MAY 2012
Table 1. Mulliken and Glowacki classication of vascular birthmarks1 Histology Presence at birth Course Female:male ratio Haemangioma Endothelial cell proliferation 40% are present at birth but usually appear as a small red mark Rapid postnatal growth and slow involution 3:1 Vascular malformation Normal endothelial cell turnover Present but not always clinically apparent Grows in proportion with the person throughout their life 1:1
review. Parents of the patient without V1 involvement may be reassured and informed about vascular laser as an option for treatment.3
Infantile haemangioma
Infantile haemangiomas (strawberry naevus) are benign vascular tumours. They occur in 510% of newborns, are more common in premature infants and have a female preponderance. Often unapparent at birth, they proliferate rapidly for several months, followed by gradual involution over several years.47 Superficial haemangiomas may be localised or segmental and appear as bright-red raised nodules (Figure 2). When located deeper in the dermis they appear as soft masses with a bluish tone. Segmental haemangiomas have a linear or geographic distribution and are more likely to have associated structural abnormalities.7 Most infantile haemangiomas involute without intervention and occupy uncomplicated sites. Those haemangiomas that are large or occupy the airway, eyes and vital organs can cause serious or life threatening complications and prompt specialist referral is required. Other complications include ulceration, secondary infection and scarring. Although resolution is considered complete in 76% of children by the age of 7 years, 50% will have minor residual changes such as telangiectasia or wrinkling.7 The treatment goal for infantile haemangioma is to prevent serious complications and permanent disfigurement (Figure 3). First line therapy has traditionally been systemic prednisolone during the proliferative phase at a dose of 2 mg/kg for 1216 weeks. Side effects included irritability, cushingoid appearance, adrenal suppression and susceptibility to infection.7 In 2008, propranolol was noted to shrink a haemangioma when used to manage a child with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.5 Since then it has emerged as a relatively safe and effective treatment for infantile haemangioma.6 However, currently there is no clearly defined guideline for the use of propranolol for haemangiomas. Most groups have used 13 mg/kg/day in divided doses after baseline assessments.6 Our current recommendations include assessment for the presence of bronchospasm, cardiac disease and vascular anomalies by a dermatologist and a paediatrician. Baseline investigations should include a blood sugar level, blood pressure, electrocardiogram and clinical photography. Propranolol is commenced at 2 mg/kg/day in two divided doses for normal infants over 2 months of age. All patients should be closely monitored during the first dose for adverse cardiac and hypoglycaemic complications. This should be done in the hospital setting. Close follow
up by a paediatrician or paediatric dermatologist is recommended. Treatment is often required until the child is 1 year of age, with subsequent slow weaning of dosage.8 Other treatments include topical and intralesional steroids, interferon alpha, imiquimod, vincristine, cyclophosphamide and excision, however, there is weak evidence to support these alternative treatments. Pulse dye laser has been used with success, particularly in ulcerated haemangiomas.4
Epidermal naevi
Epidermal naevi are hamartomatous proliferations of the epithelium. They occur in one in 1000 live births with most appearing in the first year of life. Subtypes depend on the predominant cell type which include keratinocytes, the sebaceous gland, the pilosebaceous unit, and eccrine and apocrine glands.9 The naevi are composed of a localised clone of abnormal cells arising from a somatic mutation.4 Patients with unusual or distinctive keratinocytic naevi may need specialist assessment or genetic counselling.10 Naevus sebaceous (organoid naevus or naevus sebaceous of Jadassohn) are an epidermal naevus that present as well circumscribed plaques, which may be linear. Plaques are hairless, yellow and waxy and
Reprinted from AUstralian FamilY PHYsiCian VOl. 41, NO. 5, MAY 2012 275
The macular pigmentation of dermal melanocytosis has a blue-grey tone, usually involves less than 5% of the body, and is caused by sparse melanocytes residing in the mid to low dermis.9 Site-specific dermal melanocytosis includes the naevus of Ota a unilateral blue-brown facial patch often involving the ipsilateral sclera and occurring in dark-skinned people and the naevus of Ito, which involves the upper back and shoulder. Both lesions persist throughout life and patients should undergo skin and eye surveillance due to the [rare]
Figure 2. Ulcerated infantile haemangioma involving central upper lip before treatment
Figure 3. Infantile haemangioma involving central upper lip after treatment with prednisolone and propranolol for 4 months
under the hormonal influences of puberty become more verrucous (wartlike). They appear most commonly on the scalp (Figure 4) but can present on the face and upper body. Benign and malignant tumours may arise in these naevi and a rapidly growing or ulcerated nodule within a sebaceous naevus should prompt excision. Previously, sebaceous naevi were excised in childhood to avoid the possibility of basal cell carcinoma development. As malignant progression in sebaceous naevi is rare, indications for surgery are controversial. Ongoing monitoring is a reasonable treatment option if there is no cosmetic impetus for surgery.4,10 Although epidermal naevi are most often sporadic, they can be part of a syndrome which includes neurologic, skeletal and ocular abnormalities, particularly if the naevus is extensive.4
Pigmented birthmarks
Dermal melanocytosis
Dermal melanocytosis (Mongolian spot) classically involves the lumbosacral area (Figure 5) and is seen at birth or soon after. It affects all races but has a higher prevalence in Asian children; most cases resolve in childhood.
Figure 5. Dermal melanocytosis (Mongolian spot) demonstrating classic distribution over the lumbosacral area
276 Reprinted from AUstralian FamilY PHYsiCian VOl. 41, NO. 5, MAY 2012
development of melanoma in these lesions. Naevus of Ota and naevus of Ito can be treated with pigment laser therapy.9
numbers.9 Solitary CALMs are common in up to 3% of healthy infants and 25% of children. Multiple CALMs are rare in healthy children and the majority of children with six or more CALMs will eventually be diagnosed with neurofibromatosis-1 (NF-1), potentially affecting multiple organ systems. Children with three or more CALMs should be monitored for other features of NF-1.13 Caf au lait macules may also be seen in multiple other rare syndromes.13 Isolated CALMs may be treated with pigment laser therapy.9
Summary
Birthmarks are common and in most cases parents can be reassured that they are only of cosmetic significance and that for many children the appearance will improve over time. A minority of higher risk birthmarks have complications or systemic associations that need identification and further management.
Authors
Emma Ryan MBBS, FRACGP, is a dermatology registrar, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia. emma.ryan@internode.on.net Lachlan Warren BMBS, Dip(Obs), FRACOG, FRACGP, FACD, is Head of Unit, Department of Dermatology, Womens and Childrens Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia. Conflict of interest: none declared.
References
Figure 6. Large congenital melanocytic naevus with a truncal distribution and satellite naevi
1. Mulliken JB, Glowacki J. Hemangiomas and vascular malformations in infants and children: a classification based on endothelial characteristics. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982;69:41222. 2. Juern AM, Glick ZR, Drolet BA, et al. Nevus simplex: a reconsideration of nomenclature, sites of involvement, and disease associations. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010;63:80514. 3. Piram M, Lorette G, Sirinelli D, Herbreteau D, Giraudeau B, Maruani A. Sturge-Weber syndrome in patients with facial port-wine stain. Pediatr Dermatol 2012;29:327. 4. Moss C, Shahidullah H. Naevi and other developmental defects. In: Burns T, Breathnach SM, Cox, N and Griffiths C, editors. Rooks Textbook of Dermatology. Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford 2010; p.18. 5. Laut-Labrze C, Dumas de la Roque E, Hubiche T, Boralevi F, Thambo JB, Taeb A. Propranolol for severe hemangiomas of infancy. N Engl J Med 2008;358:264951. 6. Starkey E, Shahidullah H. Propranolol for infantile haemangiomas: a review. Arch Dis Child 2011;96:8903. 7. Schwartz RA, Sidor MI, Musumeci ML, Lin RL, Micali G. Infantile haemangiomas: a challenge in paediatric dermatology. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2010;24:6318. 8. Propranolol treatment of infantile haemangiomas. In: South Australian paediatric clinical guidelines. 2012. Available at www.health.sa.gov.au. 9. Barnhill RL, Rabinovitz H. Benign melanocytic neoplasms. In: Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Rapini RP, editors. Dermatology. Elsevier Ltd. 2008; p. 112. 10. Moody MN, Landau JM, Goldberg MD. Nevus sebaceous revisited. Pediatr Dermatol 2011;29:19. 11. Marghoob AA, Borrego JP, Halpern AC. Congenital melanocytic nevi: treatment modalities and management options. Semin Cutane Med Surg 2007;26:23140. 12. Kinsler VA, Birley J, Atherton DJ. Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children Registry for congenital melanocytic naevi: prospective study 1988-2007. Part 1 epidemiology, phenotype and outcomes. Br J Derm 2009;160:14350. 13. Nunley KS, Gao F, Albers AS, et al. Predictive value of caf au lait macules at initial consultation in the diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type 1. Arch Derm 2009;145:8837.
Reprinted from AUstralian FamilY PHYsiCian VOl. 41, NO. 5, MAY 2012 277