Rolling Sphere Tool Guide: I. II. Iii
Rolling Sphere Tool Guide: I. II. Iii
I.
Calculate Protection
Test the coverage provided by the lightning shielding system. The tool will provide the geometric zones of protection. It may be appropriate to trace these protection zones on plan and section views of the substation to accurately identify protected and unprotected areas. In this section the following topics are explained. (Use the links below to navigate to a specific topic.) Shielding Configuration BIL h(e) r(c) h(m) h(w) d(max) d(1), d(2), d(3) I(s) Z(s) S r x(1), x(2), x(3) r(1) sin R (triple mast) R (triple wire) b r(2)
Shielding Configuration
Select from one of the standard shielding configurations to test its coverage. Each one requires different input parameters. Depending on their locations, multiple masts and wires can provide added coverage beyond their individual contributions. This calculator can help determine this added coverage when selecting the appropriate configuration. If the desired configuration is not listed, divide the testing area into configurations that are listed. Alternatively, use the single mast and wire configurations to determine strike distances for each individual shielding electrode and determine the protected areas graphically.
Page 1 of 14
v1.2
h(e)
Height of equipment refers to the equipment or bus needing protection (in feet). As h(e) increases, the maximum distance from the shielding device (r) must shrink to keep the equipment under the rolling sphere. Surge impedance (Z(s)) of a conductor is also affected by h(e). A conductor farther from the ground has greater surge impedance than a conductor closer to the ground.
Page 2 of 14
v1.2
n-conductor bundle:
R (0 ) = 0.5 l 'n n 2 r l'
where r l l n is the radius of the subconductor (in feet) is the spacing between adjacent conductors (in feet) is the diameter of the circle on which the subconductors lie (in feet) is the number of subconductors
h(m)
Height of mast refers to the height of the shielding mast above ground (in feet). A mast height greater than or equal to the strike distance provides the most protection. For masts, the value of the coefficient k from Eq 5-1B of IEEE 998-1996 is 1.2. When calculations require multiple masts, the shortest mast should be used for h(m).
Page 3 of 14
v1.2
d(max)
Maximum distance refers to the greatest horizontal distance (in feet) two masts or two wires can be placed from each other and still provide protection for equipment between them, provided that the equipment does not exceed a height of h(e). If d(1), d(2), or d(3) exceeds d(max), then the bottom of the sphere penetrates below the equipment height, even if it rests atop the shielding electrodes. To find d(max) between a wire and mast, conservatively select the Double Wire configuration. d(max) is calculated according to the following equation from Exhibit B.5-5 of IEEE 998-1996: For a mast:
d (max) = 2 S 2 (S h(m) + h(e) )
2
For a wire:
d (max) = 2 S 2 (S h( w) + h(e) )
2
where d S h(m) h(w) h(e) is the distance between two adjacent structures (in feet) is the strike distance (in feet) is the height of the shield mast (in feet) is the height of the shield wire (in feet) is the height of the equipment or bus to be protected (in feet)
Page 4 of 14
v1.2
I ( s ) = 2kA where
BIL is the Basic Impulse Level rating of the insulation in kV Z(s) is the surge impedance of the conductor in
Z(s)
Surge impedance refers to the impedance of the conductor that the lightning surge is passing through in . There is no input for this in the tool because it is approximated from the EPRI Red Book by Eq 12.5.5. Surge impedance: Z ( s ) = 60 ln(2h(e) / r (c)) where h(e) is the height of the equipment or bus above ground (in feet) r(c) is the radius or effective radius of the conductor (in feet)
Page 5 of 14
v1.2
r
Radius of protection refers to the distance (in feet) from the shielding electrode to the edge of protection for a given equipment height. It is calculated according to the following equations from Camden: For a mast:
r = S 2 ( S h(m)) 2 S 2 ( S h(e)) 2 r = S S 2 ( S h(e))2 For a wire: r = S 2 ( S h( w)) 2 S 2 ( S h(e)) 2 where S h(m) h(w) h(e)
is the strike distance (in feet) is the height of the shield mast (in feet) is the height of the shield wire (in feet) is the height of the equipment or bus to be protected (in feet)
Page 6 of 14
v1.2
r(1)
r1 is the radius (in feet) of the curvature of the unprotected area originating a distance of x from the midpoint of two structures, as defined above. r1 is calculated according to the following equation from Camden: Radius: r (1) = S 2 ( S h(e)) 2
Page 7 of 14
v1.2
R (triple mast)
R for the triple mast calculation describes the horizontal distance (in feet) from the masts to the center of the rolling sphere resting on top of the three masts. From the triangle formed by the three masts, a circumscribed circle of radius R can be created. The center of the rolling sphere is directly above this point. This is also from the Law of Sines and is calculated for masts according to the following equation from Camden: Triple mast calculation:
R= where d(1) is the distance between masts 1 and 2 (in feet) sin is the sine of the angle opposite d(1) Note: If triple mast (R) is greater than the strike distance (S), then the masts are too far apart for the rolling sphere to rest on top of them and the double mast calculation should be used. If triple mast (R) is less than the strike distance (S), then the rolling sphere can sit on the three masts without touching the ground. It is further necessary to determine if the sphere reaches the equipment (see calculation for b). d (1) 2 sin
Page 8 of 14
v1.2
Page 9 of 14
v1.2
r(2)
r(2) refers to the radius (in feet) of the unprotected area created by a sphere resting on top of three shielding electrodes penetrating below the equipment height. r(2) is the circular cross section of the sphere at the equipment height and is calculated according to the following equation from Camden: Radius of the unprotected area: r ( 2) = S 2 b 2 r (2) = 0 ft where S b is the strike distance (in feet) is the distance from the center of the sphere to the equipment height (in feet)
Page 10 of 14 v1.2
If a lightning shielding system does not provide complete coverage of a substation, a statistical method can be used to predict the probability that the unprotected equipment will be damaged by lightning. The statistical method takes into account the size of the unprotected area, the BIL of the equipment, and the isokeraunic level at the substation site. In this section the following topics are explained. (Use the links below to navigate to a specific topic.) d(u) T A S(m) I(sm) P(f) P(I) N F
d(u)
The distance to unprotected equipment (in feet) from a shielding electrode refers to the minimum desired value for radius of protection, r, necessary to obtain total shielding of all energized equipment. It is determined graphically by measuring the distance between the insufficient shielding electrode and the furthest point of unprotected equipment. This should be greater than the actual value of r, otherwise there is no need to calculate failure probability; a negative value of F will result.
T
The average annual isokeraunic level (T) refers to the average number of thunderstormdays in a year. A thunderstorm-day is a day where thunder was heard at least once. The linked map shows the average isokeraunic level for the U.S. as recorded by the National Weather Service.
A
A refers to the area (in square feet) of the unprotected region which can be calculated graphically by the user.
S(m)
S(m) refers to the strike distance required to produce d(u). In other words, it is the minimum desired value for strike distance that would have protected all energized equipment. S(m) is calculated using the same equations from Camden used to calculate the radius of protection, r, substituting the values of d(u) for r and S(m) for S. It then solves for S(m).
Page 11 of 14
v1.2
P(f)
P(f) refers to the probability that a lightning stroke inside the unprotected area will cause insulation failure. It is calculated according to the following equation from Camden: Probability of failure: P ( f ) = P(< I sm ) P (< I s ) where I(sm) is the minimum stroke current in kA required to produce S(m) I(s) is the stroke current in kA P(<I(sm)) [or 1-P(I(sm))] is the probability that a stroke is less than I(sm) P(<I(s)) [or 1-P(I(s))] is the probability that a stroke is less than I(s). Note: P(I(sm)) and P(I(s)) are calculated by the tool according to Eq 2-2B of IEEE 998-1996 (see calculation for P(I)).
P(I)
P(I) refers to the probability that the peak current in any stroke will exceed a given current, I. It is calculated according to Eq 2-2B of IEEE 998-1996: Probability that peak current exceeds I:
P( I ) = 1 I 1+ 24
2.6
Page 12 of 14
v1.2
F
Failure rate of insulation within the unprotected area describes the number of years between failures. It is up to the user to decide upon an acceptable failure rate for a specific substation. F is calculated according to the following equation from Camden: Failure rate: F= where P(f) is the probability of failure from a stroke N is the number of strokes in the unprotected area per year 1 P( f ) N
Page 13 of 14
v1.2
IEEE Std 998-1996. Camden, Jeff. The Rolling Sphere Method of Lightning Protection for Substations: a Practical Application, presented to Missouri Valley Electric Association, Engineering Conference, April 19, 1990. Sen, P.K. Understanding Direct Lightning Stroke Shielding of Substations, presented to Power Systems Engineering Research Center, PSERC Seminar, November 6, 2001. Transmission Line Reference Book-345 kV and Above (EPRI Red Book). Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California, 1975.
Page 14 of 14
v1.2