Sensor Based Autonomous Medical Nanorobots A Cure To Demyelination
Sensor Based Autonomous Medical Nanorobots A Cure To Demyelination
Sensor Based Autonomous Medical Nanorobots A Cure To Demyelination
C. Speed Control:
The back wheels are for speed control. Stability in speed
and rejection of disturbances like Brownian motion is crucial
for positive performance of the nan
controller is used and stability and performance of the system
is studied by using hypothetical actuator model.
Compensator
Gc(s)
Amplifier
K
Actuator
G
Speed
Sensor
H(s)
R(s)
Figure 7: Block Diagram of Speed Control System
Now here Es Rs Ys ; for unity feedback
Es
Rs
Td
Where L(s) = k G
c
(s) Ga(s).
T
d
(s) is dominant in low frequency. We want Sensitivity
function [1/{1+L(s)}] to be small for T
and Complementary Sensitivity function [L(s)/{1+L(s)}] to be
low at high frequency.
Vx3
Vx4
Figure 5: Sensor positions and angel of rotation
The outputs of four sensors are fed into a summing circuit
with consideration to their weights. The resulting Veffective is
input for an actuator which is connected to the front wheels.
Vehicle
Dynamics
)
(s)
Figure 6: Block diagram of Directional Control
Vehicle dynamics is considered to be of the form
The back wheels are for speed control. Stability in speed
and rejection of disturbances like Brownian motion is crucial
for positive performance of the nanorobots. A lead lag
controller is used and stability and performance of the system
is studied by using hypothetical actuator model.
Actuator
Ga(s)
Vehicle
Dynamics
Gd(s)
Td(s)
Na(s)
V(s)
Figure 7: Block Diagram of Speed Control System
; for unity feedback
Tds
Nas;
(s) is dominant in low frequency. We want Sensitivity
function [1/{1+L(s)}] to be small for T
d
(s) at low frequency,
and Complementary Sensitivity function [L(s)/{1+L(s)}] to be
So we want loop gain L(s) to be large at low frequency and
small at high frequency. To meet this lead lag controller is
used.
Figure 8: Lead Lag controller with a=10, b=1
D. Weight Control
A very significant design requirement is that the
nanorobots always stay nerve-borne. To do this we simply
propose to use the concept of attractive force between two
current carrying conductors- one being the nerve and the other
being current carrying nanowire on the nanorobot
Figure 9: Simple illustration of forces between nano
E. Energy Supply
The most effective way to keep the nanorobot operating
successfully is to establish the use of a continuous available
source of power. The energy must be available and delivered
to the nanorobot while it is performing prede
operational environment. For a medical nanorobot, this means
that the device has to keep working inside the human body,
sometimes for long periods, and requires easy access to clean
and controllable energy to maintain efficient operation.
Some possibilities to power the nanorobot
from ambient energy. Temperature displacements could
likewise generate useful voltage differentials. Electromagnetic
radiation from light is another option for energy generation in
determined open environments [39] but not for in vivo
medical nanorobotics. Most recently, remote inductive
powering has been used both for RFID (radio frequency
4
So we want loop gain L(s) to be large at low frequency and
lead lag controller is
Figure 8: Lead Lag controller with a=10, b=1
A very significant design requirement is that the
borne. To do this we simply
propose to use the concept of attractive force between two
one being the nerve and the other
wire on the nanorobot.
Figure 9: Simple illustration of forces between nano-wires
The most effective way to keep the nanorobot operating
successfully is to establish the use of a continuous available
The energy must be available and delivered
to the nanorobot while it is performing predened tasks in the
operational environment. For a medical nanorobot, this means
that the device has to keep working inside the human body,
d requires easy access to clean
and controllable energy to maintain efficient operation.
Some possibilities to power the nanorobot can be provided
from ambient energy. Temperature displacements could
likewise generate useful voltage differentials. Electromagnetic
radiation from light is another option for energy generation in
] but not for in vivo
cal nanorobotics. Most recently, remote inductive
powering has been used both for RFID (radio frequency
identification device) and biomedical implanted devices to
supply power on the order of milliwatts. A low frequency
energy source can be sufficient to o
functional approach presents the possibility of supplying
energy in a wireless manner [4]. Thus, it enables one to
operate sensors and actuators necessary for the controlled
operation of nanorobots inside the human body.
V. SIMULATIONS AND
A. Simulation for Directional Control
Transfer function of directional control can be found from
the block diagram of Figure 7.
Assuming T
d
(s) = 0 (i.e. no disturbances) it can be written as
1
2.26 10
9.04
10
1
Values used in the equations are hypothetical and calculated
based on practical speculations by taking mass and volume in
nano-scale. The actuator transfer function is taken similar to a
macro-level actuator but in nano-range.
Figure 10: Step response of Directional Control
Step response of the open loop directional control indicates
that even a small V
effective
can rotate the direction of
movement. This sensitive control ensures that nanorobot
moves toward the damaged area only.
B. Simulation for Speed Control
The speed control transfer function for speed control can be
written as-
,
As stated before we will use a lead lag controller as a
compensator with a pole at b and zero at
will be same as direction control actuator and vehicle
dynamics as used before. So above mentioned equation can be
identification device) and biomedical implanted devices to
supply power on the order of milliwatts. A low frequency
energy source can be sufficient to operate nanorobots. This
functional approach presents the possibility of supplying
]. Thus, it enables one to
operate sensors and actuators necessary for the controlled
operation of nanorobots inside the human body.
S AND RESULTS
Simulation for Directional Control
function of directional control can be found from
,
(i.e. no disturbances) it can be written as-
1
04 10
10
10
2 7
Values used in the equations are hypothetical and calculated
based on practical speculations by taking mass and volume in
nsfer function is taken similar to a
range.
Figure 10: Step response of Directional Control
Step response of the open loop directional control indicates
can rotate the direction of
movement. This sensitive control ensures that nanorobot
moves toward the damaged area only.
The speed control transfer function for speed control can be
As stated before we will use a lead lag controller as a
b and zero at a; actuator model
will be same as direction control actuator and vehicle
sed before. So above mentioned equation can be
5
re-written as-
10
1 2 7
2.26 10
9.04 10
Now to find out appropriate range of values of a, b and
k we have applied classical approach of stability analysis,
Routh Criterion.
Table 1: Routh Table
E
126.5
From the table it is eminent that to have a stable system-
126.5
> 0
>
126.5
So we have found valid range of a, b and k which can
also be demonstrated in 3D plot.
Figure 11: Three dimensional plot of stability region
The stability region exists above the stability surface. So we
can choose a=10 and b=1. So Compensator transfer function
Root locus and step response of the compensated system
now can be plotted to show the stability.
Figure 12: Root Locus Plot of Proposed System
Figure 13: Step response of proposed System
So the compensated system is stable. Nanorobot with this
control system can successfully move on the nerve to find
demyelinated neurons. State space representation of this
system have been found using MATLAB and rank of system
was 6, same as the order of the system which means the
system is both controllable and observable.
VI. FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS
Although the direction, speed and energy supply system
was discussed but we are still working on the payload delivery
system, where it is necessary to sense where exactly the
delivery of myelin sheath should be made.
Here in this paper we have presented a theoretical
development of a stable nanorobotic system that can be used
to cure demyelinated neurons, but practically manufacturing
of such nanorobots is not yet possible due to several practical
6
limitations in the process. However technologies are
developing so fast and time will come when producing
nanorobots like this one will not be difficult. With the
appropriate technologies in hand we can even think of
improving the system for further complex operations.
The perspective that the same manufacturing technologies
required to assemble this nanorobot could also be applied to a
broad range of fields. The research and development of
nanorobots can also provide new technologies and devices for
enhanced industrial automation. As a result of such
development, more effective and safe operations are expected
for manufacturing processes, as well as better electronics,
featuring higher performance and lower requirements.
The application of nanorobots with embedded sensor
devices for drug and diagnosos is an interesting subjcet, which
can enable significant improvements as a big precission device
for medical treatments [5]. Thus all the possibilities needs to
be considered to have better utilisation nanorobots in future
medical applications.
VII. CONCLUSION
This paper has proposed a new concept of using nerve-
borne sensor based nanorobots for medical applications.
Nerve-borne nanorobots should help, through sensing nerve
impulse singnals, to provide better understanding of
correlation of nerve signals and disease. They should also be
able to help give early diagnosis and provide new therapeutic
procedures. Again even they can help us to invastigate the
nervous system from close point of vies. Here classical control
systems analysis was adopted to illustrate one specific
application: to find the demyelinated neuron automatically and
to deliver synthetic myelin sheath to demyelinated portion of
nerve.
Stability of the nanorobots and disturbance rejection, like
brownian motion and electrical noise, are crucial to the
performance of the nanorobots. They define the limitations of
the nanorobots, and thus limit the applications where they can
be used. Therefore, collecting data and adapting to the new
situation with better control methods is paramount to the
future success of the use of nanorobots in medicine.
Although this nanorobot is not a reality today but with the
advancement of technology this proposed nanorobot can cure
thousands of demyelination disease victims with very low cost
and accurate minimal invasive surgery.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
All praises are for ALMIGHTY ALLAH, without whose
help anything would be impossible.
The authors would like to thank Professor Dr. Kazi Khairul
Islam his help at different stages of this publication.
REFERENCES
[1] Hariharan, R. and Manohar, J. 2010 "Nanorobotics as medicament:
(Perfect solution for cancer)" INTERACT 2010, page 4-7.
[2] Venkatesan, M. ; Jolad, B. 2010 Nanorobots in cancer treatment
INTERACT 2010, page 258-264
[3] Ladjal, H. ; Hanus, J.-L. ; Ferreira, A. 2009 H robustification control
of existing piezoelectric-stack actuated nanomanipulators IEEE IRCA
2009, page 3353-3358
[4] Adriano cavalcanti, Bijan Shirinzadeh, Robert A Freitas Jr and Tad
Hogg 2008 "Nanorobot architecture for medical target identification"
IOP Publishing.
[5] Freitas R A Jr 1999 "Nanomedicine vol I Basic Capabilities" Landes
Bioscience http://www.nanomedicine.com.
[6] Cavalcanti A 2003 "Assembly automation with evolutionary nanorobots
and sensor-based control applied to nanomedicine" IEEE Trans.
Nanotechnoly. 28-27.
[7] Freitas R A Jr 2005" Nanotechnology, nanomedicine and nanosurgery"
Int. J. Surg. 3 1-4.
[8] Montemagno C D and Bachand G D 1999 "Constructingnanomechanical
devices powered by biomolecular motors" Nanotechnology 10 225-231.
[9] Cavalcanti A, Shirinzadeh B, Freitas R A Jr and Kretly L C 2007
"Medical nanorobot architecture based on nanobioelectronics" Recent
Patents on Nanotechnologyvol 1 (Pennington, NJ, USA: Bentham
Science Publishers Ltd.) pp 1-10.C. J. Kaufman, Rocky Mountain
Research Lab., Boulder, CO, private communication, May 1995.
[10] Montemagno C D and Bachand G D 1999 Constructing nanomechanical
devices powered by biomolecular motors Nanotechnology 10 22531.
[11] Cavalcanti A, Shirinzadeh B, Freitas R A Jr and Kretly L C 2007
Medical nanorobot architecture based on nanobioelectronics Recent
Patents on Nanotechnology vol 1 (Pennington, NJ, USA: Bentham
Science Publishers Ltd.) pp 110.
[12] Mathieu J B, Beaudoin G and Martel S 2006 Method of propulsion of a
ferromagnetic core in the cardiovascular system through magnetic
gradients generated by an MRI system IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 53
292299.
[13] Sierra D P, Weir N A and Jones J F 2005 A review of research in the
eld of nanorobotics Sandia Report Ofce of Scientic and Technical
Information, US Department of Energy.
[14] Behkam B and Sitti M 2006 Design methodology for biomimetic
propulsion of miniature swimming robots Trans. ASME J. Dyn. Syst.
Meas. Control 128 3643.
[15] Jiang H-W, Wang S-G, Xu W, Zhang Z-Z and He L 2005 Research and
progress in bio-nano-robot Jiqiren (Robot) 27 569574.
[16] Xi J, Schmidt J J and Montemagno C D 2005 Self-assembled
microdevices driven by muscle Nat. Mater. 4 180184.
[17] Villar I D, Matias I R, Arregui F J and Claus R O 2005 ESA-based in-
ber nanocavity for hydrogen-peroxide detection IEEE Trans.
Nanotechnol. 4 187193.
[18] LiW J, Xi N, FungW K and Wong T S 2004 Nanorobotics and
nanomanipulation Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology
vol 7 (Valencia, CA, USA: American Scientic Publishers) pp 351365.
[19] Ummat A, Sharma G, Mavroidis C and Dubey A 2005 Bio-
nanorobotics: state of the art and future challenges Biomedical
Engineering Handbook (London, UK: CRC Press).
[20] Lewis M A and Bekey G A 1992 The behavioral self-organization of
nanorobots using local rules Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots
and Systems (Raleigh, NC, July 1992).
[21] Couvreur P and Vauthier C 2006 Nanotechnology: intelligent design to
treat complex disease Pharm. Res. 23 14171450.
[22] Katz E, Riklin A, Shabtai V H, Willner I and B uckmann A F 1999
Glucose oxidase electrodes via reconstitution of the apo-enzyme:
tailoring of novel glucose biosensors Anal. Chim. Acta 385 4558.
[23] McDevitt M R et al 2001 Tumor therapy with targeted atomic
nanogenerators Science 294 15371540.
[24] Patel G M, Patel G C, Patel R B, Patel J K and Patel M 2006 Nanorobot:
a versatile tool in nanomedicine J. Drug Targeting 14 6367.
[25] Toth-Fejel T T 2000 Agents, assemblers, and ANTS: scheduling
assembly with market and biological software mechanisms
Nanotechnology 11 133137.
[26] Vaughn J R 2006 Over the horizon: potential impact of emerging trends
in information and communication technology on disability policy and
practice National Council on Disability (Washington DC, Dec.).
[27] Sand S B B and Wiest O 2003 Theoretical studies of mixed-valence
transition metal complexes for molecular computing page 285291.
7
[28] Bacskai B J, Kajdasz S T, Christie R H, Carter C, Games D, Seubert P,
Schenk D and Hyman B T 2001 Imaging of amyloid-beta deposits in
brains of living mice permits direct observation of clearance of plaques
with immunotherapy Nat. Med. 7 36972.
[29] Sola E, Prestori F, Rossi P, Taglietti V and DAngelo E 2004 Increased
neurotransmitter release during long-term potentiation at mossy bre-
granule cell synapses in rat cerebellum J. Physiol. 557 84361.
[30] Campagnoni A T and Macklin W B 1988 Cellular and molecular aspects
of myelin protein gene expression Mol. Neurobiol. Spring 2 4189.
[31] Cavalcanti A and Freitas R A Jr 2005 Nanorobotics control design: a
collective behavior approach for medicine IEEE Trans. Nanobiosci. 4
133140.
[32] Albert K J, Lewis N S, Schauer C L, Sotzing G A, Stitzel S E, Vaid T P
and Walt D R 2000 Cross-reactive chemical sensor arrays Chem. Rev.
100 25952626.
[33] Weckenmann Albert, Hoffmann Jrg, Schuler Alexander, Development
Of A Tunnelling Current Sensor For A Long-Range Nano-Positioning
Device.
[34] Suh J W, Darling R B, Bohringer K F, Donald B R, Baltes H and
Kovacs G T A 1999 CMOS integrated ciliary actuator array as a
general-purposemicromanipulation too for small objects J.
Microelectromech. Syst. 8 483496.
[35] Xiong P, Molnar S V, Moerland T S, Hong S and Chase P B 2006
Biomolecular-based actuator US Patent Specication 7014823.
[36] Rosewater D L and Goldstein S C 2006 Methods of chemically
assembled electronic nanotechnology circuit fabrication US Patent
Specication 7064000.
[37] Dubin V M 2006 Nanofabrication using carbon nanotubes and DNA US
Patent Specication 7122461.
[38] Yarmolich Dmitry Simulation of Nerve Impulse Propagation
323674218.
[39] Liu W, Wyk J D V and OdendaalW G 2004 Design and evaluation of
integrated electromagnetic power passives with vertical surface
interconnections IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conf. and Exposition
(Blacksburg VA,Feb. 2004) vol 2, pp 958963.