GREEN SCHOOL DESIGN

(Revision no.1, Dated 07/14/2010)

I. Introduction:

Public school facilities must be designed and constructed to be efficient, effective,
and sustainable for their expected building life. Section 255.2575, Florida Statutes,
requires all school district, college, and university buildings to be constructed to meet
the requirements of one of the three green building standards approved by the
Department of Management Services. In response to this statutory requirement, the
Florida Department of Management Services, requires that state-owned facilities
meet the same standards required in the private sector.

The three models of compliance: United States Green Building Council (USGBC)
Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), Green Building Initiative
(GBI) Green Globes rating system, Florida Green Building Coalition Standards
(FGBC), or a nationally recognized, high-performance green building rating system
as approved by the Department of Management Services.

Each school district or college, after much consideration, shall select a model for
each facilitys project to follow. Each model requires the assistance of a registered
design professional to direct the project in accordance with the selected models
measurement criteria. The model chosen by the school district or college must have
a unit of measurement that ensures efficiency, effectiveness (outcomes), and
conversion of the defined objectives and frequently subjective standards to meet the
models application. Each model will lend itself to adaptation with school district and
college dynamics to varying degrees.

The school district or college organizational structures shall be set up to include all
necessary decision makers in accordance with the model selected for the green
school design. The model selected shall consider that all Floridas public schools
must be built of Type I, II, or IV construction, precluding the application of
combustible materials.


II. Summary of State-Approved Methods:

A. (USGBC) LEED Rating System: LEED is an acronym that stands for
Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design. USGBC refers to the
United States Green Building Council. The USGBC Web site is
www.usgbc.org. Information concerning organizational membership is
accessible online at: www.usgbc.org.

This model of green building standard is well assembled and organized.
According to this model there are six basic areas of consideration for
achieving a green school status: Sustainable Sites, Water Efficiency, Energy
and Atmosphere, Materials and Resources, Indoor Environmental Quality,
and Innovation and Design Process. There are four different levels of
achievement; based on assessment points for each facility, certified, silver,
gold, and platinum.

Costs to obtain organizational membership, a level of achievement for each
school building, and a method to maintain or improve the facilities level of
certification may easily total thousands of dollars, which can be offset in
operational savings benefits to the owner of the facility. The LEED online
Web page provides a Schools Reference Guide that explains how to
achieve various levels of facility certification. Each area of consideration is
thoroughly explained, definitions for technical terms are provided, and
assessment points are based on certification ratings in each area of
consideration. Also, information resources for each area of consideration are
given with Web sites to review pertinent standards. USGBC estimates that
the cost to merely register and certify a facility is an average of $5,500 for
new facilities and $3,500 for existing facilities, not including facility
improvements.

This model is easy to follow, and offers comprehensive and pertinent
coverage of applicable information, but cost for membership and facility
certifications is considerable. LEED claims to be a voluntary market-driven
rating system to evaluate green building technology for various buildings. The
LEED model is intended to be comprehensive in coverage but simple in
application. As LEED develops new technology and new materials are
developed, online amendments and notices will be available for review.

B. (GBI) Green Globes Rating System: GBI is an acronym that stands for
Green Building Initiative. Information about GBI is accessible online at
www.greenglobes.com/design.

In 2004, GBI acquired the rights to distribute Green Globes in the United
States. In 2005, the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) accredited
GBI as a standards developer for developing Green Globes as an official
standard under the American National Standard Institute (ANSI). The
standard is written in easy-to-understand terms; no environmental design
experience is needed to use the system. The system requires no training and
is computer-friendly.

Green Globes is focused on reducing the environmental impacts of buildings
based on the following assessment categories: energy, indoor environment,
site, resources, water, emissions and effluents, and project management.
Green Globes provides for the architect, engineer, construction group, and
building owner to determine the methods to reduce operating costs and
enhance the living and working environment for the occupants through the
GBI system.

The Green Globes Tool is an online survey that provides the user with
numerous options, tools, tips, and clarifications for the completion of the
survey. The survey compares seven categories: energy, indoor environment,
site impact, water, resources, emissions, and project management. Based
on the responses submitted, points are assigned and a rating level for the
facility is established. The rating level is based on a percentage.
The report indicates how the facility rates (percentage) and recommends how
to improve scores. The four rating levels that buildings can achieve are: 35-
54%, 55-69%, 70-84%, and 85-100%. The cost to register a facility and use
third-party verification is approximately $5,000 to $7,000, not including the
facility improvements.

C. (FGBC) Florida Green Building Coalition. Information regarding the FGBC is
accessible online at www.floridagreenbuilding.org. For commercial building
information, select Certification at the top of the page, then select
Commercial for the commercial building aspects of FGBC.

The Web page has a vast array of valuable information as it relates to
sustainable economics, and the environmental and social benefits of
providing green building standards. The commercial building standard side of
FGBC focuses on public schools (K-12), and Group B occupancies for
educational facilities over grade 12 (i.e., colleges), as listed in the Florida
Building Code. The FGBC standard is used to adopt environmental
strategies during the design and construction phases of a project so that the
facility can be recognized for its efforts.

The standard recognizes seven categories: energy, water, site, health,
materials, disaster mitigation, and general values. A total of 100 possible
points can be generated for each category. The project team reviews all
categories to determine what credits to target and how many points are to be
pursued for the project. When all paper work is completed by the submitting
designee, the application fees are determined, and payment is forwarded to
FGBC, then the FGBC appoints an evaluator to begin his/her review of the
project. The processing fees are based on building size (square footage) and
the fees vary from $3,000 to $6,000 for each building, not including
improvements.

The FGBC evaluates the project upon receipt of appropriate fees and
determines whether the project is in compliance with FGBC standards. If the
project is compliant, the FGBC issues a certificate to the designee for use by
the owner. If the project is deemed non-compliant, the designee can correct
the deficiencies and resubmit the project to FGBC.

III. Areas of Design Concern in Public Schools
Some areas of design concern for public schools are listed below; however, the list
does not include all items that a district/college may need to consider when
designing, remodeling, or renovating a facility.
Energy Efficiency: Energy efficiency can be enhanced through energy-saving
activities such as renewable energy solar and wind power; basic changes in day-to-
day operations; proactive maintenance; encouraging new individual behavior as it
relates to energy savings; and encouraging students to apply the lessons of energy-
efficiency methodology in their homes and communities.
Water Efficiency: Water efficiency can be accomplished through conservation of
water usage for cleaning, cooking, washing, and irrigation; the collection and
distribution of rain water for the watering of landscape and the storage of rain water
for later usage; and the treatment and recycling of effluent water for use as irrigation
of the landscape as an alternate source for watering.
Sustainable Site Features: Sustainable landscapes include features native to the
area or region; watershed features that can be used to hold or divert waters away
from the facility; and operational and maintenance enhancements.

Health and Indoor Air Quality: Ventilation systems that are appropriate for the region;
lighting (artificial or natural); thermal insulated building envelope and high-efficiency
HVAC comfort systems; implementing better design features and materials;
improving construction performance by maintaining cleaner interiors during
construction; commissioning of the facility; and operating and maintaining the facility
in ways to reduce the indoor pollution while ensuring that fresh air is continually
supplied and properly circulated.

Construction Materials: The use of building materials that are climate-rated for the
construction region in which the facility is erected should be considered. The
recycling of building contents, the re-use of demolition materials or refurbished
existing building materials, and the re-use of demountable partitions and adaptable
interior wall systems should be considered as part of the construction material
selection process. The recycling of demolition materials shall be considered in order
to lessen the impact on the environment.

Disaster Mitigation: How quickly could a district restore a facility back into operation
after a natural disaster such as a hurricane, tornado, wind storm, lightning strike, hail
storm, fire, or a flood event? Policy set forth by the local school/college board should
consider the following: funding source for clean-up, and disaster relief from local,
state, and federal government agencies.

IV District and Community College Policy Options

The District and Community College Policy Options for public schools are listed
below; however, the list is not all-inclusive. A district or college may need to consider
other policy options when designing, remodeling, or renovating a school facility.
Publish goals and objectives for green school designs
Communicate which state-approved method or standard is to be used
Establish an internal evaluation process
In-house school staff training
V. Conclusion
Boards must develop policies to clarify their intent to design and build efficient,
effective, and sustainable public school facilities in accordance with Section
255.2575, Florida Statutes. Through these policies, Florida public schools will
provide cleaner, greener, and healthier learning environments. By making simple yet
effective changes, we can dramatically reduce our carbon footprint and leave a
cleaner, more comfortable earth for future generations.

Benefits to Being a Green School:
Healthy, safe learning environment
High student performance
Increase teacher and support staff satisfaction and retention
Increase attendance by reducing health risks and triggers for asthma
Increase sense of ownership by teachers, staff, students, and parents
Increase connection between the community and school
Prepare students to understand and act on the current and future
environmental challenges
Build partnerships with the local community to design and implement projects
and programs that will result in a healthier environment and safer school
Use of the school buildings and grounds as a teaching tool
Model environmental and conservation best management practices in
building, landscape design, and maintenance can reduce costs
Avoidance of costly repairs
Reduce operating costs
Save money by reducing consumption and operating cost
Protect natural resources
Reduce liability; avoid negative publicity