Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Maxing Electronic Technology MX Lnbs Of: Test Report Ku Band Lnbs

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

54 55 TELE-audiovision International The Worlds Leading Digital TV Industry Publication 09-10/2014 www.TELE-audiovision.com www.TELE-audiovision.

com 09-10/2014 TELE-audiovision International


Single and Quad LNBs excellent for receiving
weak satellites
Twin LNB ideal solution for strong satellites
and extensive distribution systems
excellent workmanship
performance equal to other best quality
LNBs on the market
Maxing
Electronic
Technology
MX LNBs of
TEST REPORT Ku band LNBs
09-10/2014
www.TELE-audiovision.com/14/09/maxing
56 TELE-audiovision International The Worlds Leading Digital TV Industry Publication 09-10/2014 www.TELE-audiovision.com
TEST REPORT Ku band LNBs
MAXING MX-16, MX-KT22C, MX-KQ24C
Excellent workmanship give excellent
reception results
Good For Strong
and Weak Satellites
We have already pre-
sented one LNB of Maxing
Electronic Technology the
MB04 universal LNB for Ku
Band with an integrated DiS-
EqC switch (see TELE-au-
diovision 07-08/2014). This
time we picked some other
LNBs of their huge collection
of models, namely the more
commonly used versions of
Single, Twin and Quad LNBs
for Ku Band. Maxing gave
them these model names:
MX-16, MX-KT22C and MX-
KQ24C respectively.
The LNBs we put to our
test bench this time looked
from the outset typical for
Ku Band LNBs. They were
fnished off very well. The
only small drawback we no-
ticed was that their labels
were made of paper. So,
you can not expect them to
survive long when installed
outside on a dish. How-
ever, do you really care?
Once installed, you usually
do not pay any more atten-
tion to the LNB on your dish.
Even if the label is eventu-
ally peeled off by rain and
wind this will not trigger any
problem or esthetic discom-
fort. Thats why we do not
should know that it was a
low noise (NF=0.2 dB) con-
temporary LNB of very good
quality. We decided to use
the LNB poiting to the AS-
TRA satellite on 19.2 East.
Although this satellite was
very strong in our location,
it did not necessarily mean
that the test was easier to
pass.
In such environment
(Toroidal dish and strong sig-
nals) you may expect quite
some interference from
neighboring satellites so ad-
ditional to the low noise fg-
ure the LNB under test must
also offer a low phase noise,
high cross polarization isola-
regard this as a serious im-
perfection.
What really counts is the
performance. We decided
to use our Toroidal multi-
feed dish with 8 LNBs. For
the purpose of this test we
replaced one of its LNBs
with one by one the Max-
ing LNBs. The original LNB
served as the reference to
which the Maxing MX LNBs
were to be compared to. You
tion and high resistance to
intermodulation. The most
practical way to evaluate all
those parameters at once
is to compare the LNB un-
der test to another one of a
different brand. And thats
what we did.
As usually, we compared
the LNB power output which
is directly related to signal
strength and Modulation
Error Ratio (MER) which in
turn is related to the signal
quality. The frst two graphs
present the signal strength.
Evidently, the MX-16 was
weaker than our reference,
the MX-KT22C was visibly
stronger and the MX-KQ24C
was more or less equal.
OPINION
EXPERT
+

RECOMMENDED
PRODUCT BY
Jacek Pawlowski
Test Center
Poland
MAXING MX-16,
MX-KT22C, MX-KQ24C
Ku band LNBs

58 59 TELE-audiovision International The Worlds Leading Digital TV Industry Publication 09-10/2014 www.TELE-audiovision.com www.TELE-audiovision.com 09-10/2014 TELE-audiovision International
What is worth mentioning,
both outputs of the Twin LNB
and all four outputs of the
Quad LNB were almost iden-
tical. So none of the outputs
was weaker or stronger than
the others with the same
LNB.
Then we measured and
processed the MER results.
And here we had another
picture. We may say that
the MX-16 matched our ref-
erence, the MX-KT22C was
somewhat worse and the
MX-KQ24C was again almost
equal to the reference.
The reason for this is
clear: the MX-KT22C has
been designed as a high
output LNB and due to that
its noise performance is not
as good as the normal out-
put level companions (Single
and Quad in this case), whch
is due to increased inter-
modulation in such high gain
LNB. However, this makes
this LNB a favorite for re-
ceiving strong satellites
connected to a distribution
system with signifcant sig-
nal loss due to long cables
or many switches.
The MX-16 and MX-KQ24C
did not have such a strong
output signal but performed
very well in signal qual-
ity measurements. We can
recommend them even for
diffcult reception condi-
tions. They they perform as
well as the best LNBs on the
market.
Finally, we measured cur-
rent consumption of all
LNBs. Here are the results:
MX-1672 mA
MX-KT22C104 mA
MX-KQ24C152 mA.
The d.c. currents are quite
reasonable and similar to
other devices of this kind.
They will not cause any
problem for any receiver or
multiswitch.
Excellent noise performance of the Single and Quad LNBs:
MX-11 and MX-KQ24C
Very strong output of the Twin LNB: MX-KT22H
lables made of paper
TELE-audiovision already tested the
MB04, a LNB with integrated DiSEqC
switch
http://www.tele-audiovision.com/
TELE-audiovision-1407/eng/maxing.pdf

You might also like