Demag en PDF
Demag en PDF
Demag en PDF
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
Introduction
1. Features of thin-walled packaging containers
Markets and applications
Classification
Typical materials
Quality requirements
Mould-related requirements
Requirements for automation
Enhanced function integration for packaging containers
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
4. Economics
Assessment of prorated costs of production
Comparison of economics
Conclusions
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
Introduction
In order to produce injection-molded, thin-walled packaging containers
economically in an increasingly competitive market, molders are compelled
to proceed in strict observation of the cost factors in designing the products
to be molded. In order to save raw material, the tend is towards ever
thinner wall thicknesses which in the production phase create special
requirements to be fulfilled by the injection-molding machine and the
production
environment.
Injection-molding
systems
that
are
custom-designed for a specific application form the basis of economical
production. The objective of the present article is to review how far modern
injection-molding machines and their drive concepts are capable of
meeting the process requirements associated with the production of
packaging containers.
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
Machine:
Screw:
Mould:
Appication:
Diameter:
Hight:
Flow parth:
Wall thickness:
<>=
320: 1
293 cm
PP, MFI 35 g/10min (190/2,16kg)
33.5 g
0.12 s Injection time
0.25 s Holding time
0.80 s Cooling time
0.10 s Pause time (Handling time)
1.42 s Machine time ( 330 mm )
2.69 s Cycle time
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
Cycle time
0.33
Ejector
0.69
Mould open
1.20
Dosage
0.80
Cooling time
Holding pressure
0.25
0.12
Injection
0.10
Nozzle protection
Mould shut
0.73
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
Holding time
45
Cooling time
40
Time [s]
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
0,75
1,25
1,75
2,25
2,75
3,25
3,75
4,25
4,75
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
Due to the high injection speeds for molding thin-walled containers with a
high flow-distance/ wall-thickness ratio, correspondingly high injection and
cavity pressures ha to be reckoned with.
2.3. Pressure profile
The pressure profile obtained in molding the planting pot with a wall
thickness of 0.45mm bears out the high injection pressure required of
approx.1,500 bar. The interpretation of the pressure plot also shows that
the maximum cavity pressure in the injection phase occurs after 0.18s.
The holding pressure phase of 0.25s has only little influence on the
molding of the part because the melt is already solidified. The melt is
compacted only near the gate in the bottom area of the molding as the
cavity pressure continues to drop until the gate has been sealed.
Studies undertaken with the single-cavity mould for making planting pot
provided information on the pressure propagation during the molding
process. The pressure, measured at a point close to the gate and at
another point away from the gate permits conclusions to be drawn
regarding the pressure drop over the flow path.
If the pressure drop is plotted over the melt path, it will be noticed that
considerable pressure losses occur during the injection phase already in
the machine nozzle and in the hot runner system. This means that,
depending on the specific application, it is necessary to provide injection
barrels with injection pressures of up to 2,400 bar, in individual cases even
as high as 3,000 bar, in order to obtain a sufficiently high pressure in the
mould.
Injection pressure
[bar]
1500
0,1
0,12
0,14
0,16
0,18
0,2
350
315
280
245
210
175
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
1400
140
1400
140
1200
120
1200
120
1000
100
800
80
600
60
400
200
0
0,00
s screw
0,10
0,20
0,30
pressure [bar]
160
1600
P spec.
PWi
1800
1600
pressure [bar]
180
P spec.
PWi
180
160
s screw
1000
100
800
80
600
60
40
400
40
20
200
20
0
0,40
0
0,00
time [s]
0,10
0,20
time [s]
0,30
1800
0
0,40
Fig.8: Pressure profile at high injection speed with and without stepping.
Demag Plastics Machinery (Ningbo) Co., Ltd.
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
Moldtemperatur
Material PP
C
Barrel temperature
DH
MH5
MH4
MH3
MH2
MH1
EFZ
Materialtemperatur
300-320
280-300
260-280
240-260
220-240
200-220
180-200
160-180
140-160
120-140
100-120
80-100
60-80
40-60
20-40
DH: Dse
EFZ: Einfllzone
MH: Mantelheizung
L= 25 D Screw
L= 20 D Screw
Barrel screw
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
F2
S1=Machine deformation
under clamping force
(Tie bar extension)
S2=Mould deformation
(Mould deformation)
S3=Machine deformation
Under locking force
F3
F1
S1
S2
S3
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
Clamping force
Speed
Mould open
50
100
Mould close
200
150
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
Piston velocity
Master curve
Force characteristic
Protection range
Offset curve
15 mm
Normal operation
Piston velocity
Point of collision
Collision case
Force characteristic
Carriage movement
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
The protective function is not limited to the mould approach range (just
before the mould halves contact). The system will detect obstacles over
the full opening stroke and during the whole movement of the clamping
unit. Since the use of the protective function with active braking of mould
movements does not increase the cycle time, here is a technology that is
a main benefit for fast-cycling applications.
3.2. Injection unit
3.2.1 Mechanical design
The production of packaging containers includes applications involving
markedly different requirement profiles. Therefore, a certain degree of
flexibility is needed with respect to the injection unit.
It should be possible to combine different injection units with a clamping
unit. The machine design should be amenable to optimization for specific
applications.
The top of the injection should be guided and supported on linear guide
systems in order to ensure minimum friction and, thereby, easy
movement in an axial direction.
Positioning cylinder for the axial movement of the injection unit and
nozzle contact should be in line with the screw barrel in order to ensure
non-skewing nozzle contact as well as minimum wear when using
extended nozzles and screw bushes.
The mounting arrangement for the screw barrel should be flexible so as
to accommodate screws with L/D ratios of 25:1 in two different diameters
and with different injection pressures.
A high-resolution stroke-measuring system can be provided for accurate
detection of screw positions which, linked up with the machine controller,
is another contribution towards optimum process and pressure control.
An electric-motor-operated screw drive is recommendable which, in
comparison to the hydraulic operated variant, saves energy and is
Demag Plastics Machinery (Ningbo) Co., Ltd.
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
Servo valve
Accumulator
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
a=12m/s a=5m/s
800mm/s
633mm/s
157ms
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
Barrier zone
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
Barrel screw
Passive
edge of
flight
Active
edge of
flight
Active
edge of
flight
Solid channel
Fig. 20: Melting profile in barrier screw /3 section screw plasticizing unit
3.2.4. Barrier screw
In a barrier screw, the compression zone of the 3 section screw is
replaced by a barrier section. A second flight is started at the beginning
of the barrier section which is undercut below the primary flight to form a
gap relative to the cylinder barrel. This design feature separates solids
and melts because only fully molten material can pass through the
narrow gap into the melt channel. Correct process control provided, a
thin melt film forms, and the introduction of heat energy by conduction
and friction into the solids is improved. Due to the steeper pitch of the
barrier flight, melt will collect in the widening melt channel whereas flight
depth and width of the solids channel decrease. The melt efficiency of
barrier screws compared to standard 3 section screws is considerably
higher, depending on the type of material. The use of barrier screws
enables uniform, intensive and controlled melting to be effected. Special
mixing and shearing devices do additional homogenizing jobs, including
the addition of colorants.
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
Servomotor
and closing
Cores
Servomotor
Variable
capacity
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
Cup 0.5 L
mould: 4 impressions
gate: Open hot runner needles
application:
diameter:
heigth:
flow path:
wall thickness:
Cup
94
128
175
0,45
mm
mm
mm
mm
flow path./
wall thickness ratio: 390 : 1
proj. area: 278 cm
material: PP
shot weight: 68,8
cycle time: 0,15
0,30
1,32
0,12
1,89
3,78
g
s injection time
s holding pressure
s cooling time
s pause time (Handling)
s machine time
s cycle time
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
cavity
Drinking cup
71 mm
82 mm
107 mm
0.58 mm (Bottom)
s Injection time
s Holding time
s Cooling time
s Pause time
s Machine time
s Cycle time
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
4. Economics
4.1. Assessment of prorated costs of production
Material
Mould
IMM
Labor / Setup cost
1.9
1.9
3.6
3.8
100
80
27.9
31.7
Costs
7.5
20.9
60
40
1.2
30
61.8
65.4
ET200/560-840
Rapid
ET200/560-840
EL-EXIS S
69.4
20
0
ET250/630-1450
EL-EXIS S
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
numbers. The mould remains in the machine for a long period of time and
automatic switch-on and start-up programs permit relatively simple
starting of the machines (for instance at the beginning of each week) and
take little time. Apart from that, it is common practice for one operator to
supervise several machines. This explains the small percentage of labor
and setup costs in the costs of production to be reckoned with.
The remaining elements of the costs of production are the investment
costs for the machine and auxiliaries (28%) and for the mould (4%).
Compared to the production of technical parts which generally are
produced in small numbers, the prorated investment costs in the case of
packaging containers referred to the total product cost are rather low. The
explanation is that investment costs can be spread over a larger number
of pieces: And the prorated costs per part are reduced.
In the light of the cost situation described, it can be concluded that it
definitely pays off to invest in efficient and reliable injection-molding
machines and moulds in order to improve productivity.
4.2. Comparison of economics
In the study recited below, 3 different variants were reviewed for the
production of the drinking cups with respect to production costs and
contrasted with the least efficient variant.
Variant 1: Injection-molding machine Ergotech rapid with hydraulic drive
concept and 6- cavity mould.
Variant 2: Injection-molding machine Ergotech Elexis S with electrical
drive concept and 6-cavity stack mould.
Variant 3: Injection-molding machine Ergotech Elexis S with electrical
drive concept and 6+6 cavity.
The estimated cost of production for variant 1 amount to Euro 13.39
/1000 pieces.
Considering the lower energy costs coupled with the cycle time reduction
of 0.3s, this amounts to a saving in production costs relative to variant 1
of about Euro 0.74/1000 pieces for the Elexis S machine despite the
Demag Plastics Machinery (Ningbo) Co., Ltd.
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
lower investment cost for the Ergotech rapid machine calculated on the
basis of prices in 1997.
Another possibility of lowering production costs is the use of stack moulds
with two parting lines behind each other. Theoretically, such a mould can,
on the same clamping area, almost double the part output because, on
account of the coinciding buoyancy areas in both daylights, no higher
locking force is required.
The reference machine in the comparison is an Ergotech Elexis S with
2500KN and 6+6 cavity stack mould. In view of the heavier mould
weight and the longer opening stroke required, the model with 2500KN
instead of 2000KN was selected. In addition, a larger-size injection unit
was chosen in order to cover the higher plasticizing and injection
capacity.
In production, the system with the 6+6 cavity stack mould attains a cycle
time of 3.9s which is equivalent to an out put of 6545 pieces/h, this means
that productivity has been almost doubled.
The saving compared to variant 1 has been estimated at Euro 1.46/1000
pieces which makes it the most economical variant.
It should be mentioned at this junction that a valid economical
assessment with respect to the use of stack moulds is extremely difficult.
Stack moulds pose most exacting demands in terms of machine
performance, mould technology and operator skills. The availability
obtainable and assurance of proper support for such equipment are
aspects that users should carefully review in the light of their production
environment.
Conclusions
Investment in state-of-art technology, whether in respect of the
injection-molding machines, the moulds of parts-removal technology, as
the case may be, generally mean a higher financial outlay. However, the
extra expense will pay off in the medium term because the consistent use
of modern injection-molding systems allows the molder of thin-wall
Demag Plastics Machinery (Ningbo) Co., Ltd.
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!:
Thank you for your time. If you have any questions, please dont hesitate to
contact our application engineer Mr. Jack Liu with email
jackliu@demag-ergotech.com.cn for more information.
Stephan Greif
CEO Demag Ningbo
Vice President China
!
"# $
%&('*)+&,.021
$435
021
/6
7 89!: