Spondylosis2 PDF
Spondylosis2 PDF
Spondylosis2 PDF
Synopsis of Causation
Spondylosis
September 2008
Disclaimer
This synopsis has been completed by medical practitioners. It is based on a literature search at the
standard of a textbook of medicine and generalist review articles. It is not intended to be a metaanalysis of the literature on the condition specified.
Every effort has been taken to ensure that the information contained in the synopsis is accurate and
consistent with current knowledge and practice and to do this the synopsis has been subject to an
external validation process by consultants in a relevant specialty nominated by the Royal Society of
Medicine.
The Ministry of Defence accepts full responsibility for the contents of this synopsis, and for any
claims for loss, damage or injury arising from the use of this synopsis by the Ministry of Defence.
1.
Definition
1.1
Strictly speaking, spondylosis means fusion of vertebrae. In normal usage, however, the
word refers to a variety of conditions involving degenerative changes of the spine.
These are:
1.2
Cervical spondylosis
Lumbar spondylosis
Lumbar degenerative disc disease; and
Lumbar facet arthropathy
Related changes in the longitudinal ligaments and the ligamentum flavum are often also
included.
2.
Clinical Features
2.1
2.1.2
2.1.3
areas. Movements that put a load on the disc precipitate the pain. If there is a
prolapse of the disc resulting in impingement on the nerve roots, there will be
symptoms and signs according to the site and degree of root compression.
Lumbar disc prolapse is usually preceded by previous episodes of pain, but may
occur without warning.
2.1.4
Lumbar facet arthropathy.8 The ligaments supporting the facet joints between
the vertebrae are subjected to a great deal of stress during all spinal movements,
particularly rotation and extension. These joints are well supplied by nerves and
pain can be provoked by various manoeuvres. Symptoms include local pain and
tenderness, pain on extension or rotation (usually toward the affected side),
groin or thigh pain and relief from the pain by walking. It has been claimed that
patients who do not have damage to these joints demonstrable on magnetic
resonance scanning do not have back pain.9 Injection of local anaesthesia in and
around affected joints has been shown to reduce symptoms in certain patients.
This condition on its own does not appear to produce any serious consequences,
although the pain can limit activities. It is probable that facet joint changes are
linked to the whole process of disc degeneration.
2.2
The symptom of low back pain is probably caused initially by disc injuries, initially
circumferential tears in the annulus fibrosus. The outer part of this structure has a nerve
supply, and the pain results from local damage. If there are a number of these tears, they
may join to produce one or more radial tears. Herniation of the disc may occur and will
produce symptoms depending on the pressure effects of the herniated portion. The
nucleus pulposus undergoes biochemical changes resulting in loss of water, reduction in
intrinsic resilience and change in shape. In turn, this can cause stresses on the ligaments
and facet joints. Eventually, the discs become dehydrated, smaller and irregular. By this
time, they may not themselves produce pain, but disruption of the normal anatomy
results in osteophyte formation, and stress, damage and inflammation in the facet joints
and ligaments.
2.3
Back pain and spinal cord injury may occur with decompression sickness in divers. This
is not directly related to spondylosis but may be relevant in individuals presenting with
back pain who have been divers. The damage sustained is thought to be due to the
formation of gas bubbles or fat in the arteries and veins supplying the spinal cord or in
the spinal cord itself. Recovery is usually good, but in some patients there may be longterm consequences.10
3.
Aetiology
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.2.1
Degenerative disease of the spine was thought for some time to be entirely due
to loading stresses and repeated minor trauma to the discs, joints and ligaments.
However, the aetiology of degenerative spine disease is now known to be more
complex and multifactorial, with family history and childhood environment
being of considerable importance.11
3.2.2
Family and twin studies have demonstrated the significant role of genetic
factors, and various specific genetic features have been shown to be associated
with sciatica, lumbar disc degeneration and herniation.12
3.2.3
There is also good evidence to link cigarette smoking and other cardiovascular
risk factors to degenerative spine disease and to back pain. This is probably due
to a reduction in blood supply resulting in anoxia in the intervertebral disc, and
leading to cell death. The response to this cell death is inflammation, with
ingrowth of blood vessels and nerves into the disc.
Physical loading of the spine almost certainly plays a part in the causation of
back disorders.13
3.3.2
The effects on the spine of compression, torsion and shearing have been
investigated directly in various studies, both in the workplace and in the
laboratory.14 In general, there appears to be a cause and effect relationship
between the magnitude of the forces exerted and the resulting damage, but the
relationships are complicated and depend on posture when the forces are
applied. In addition, tolerance to the damage and the degree of disability
produced varies greatly between individuals.
3.3.3
It may be that heavy loading of certain types can cause more symptoms in some
patients who already have age-related degenerative changes in the spine.15
3.3.4
The relationships between load and disc degeneration, are however not well
established in epidemiological studies, and reviews suggest that other issues,
such as psychosocial factors,16 are important in defining the level of resultant
illness and disability (see section 3.4 below).
3.3.5
Associations have been described between back disorders and various work
activities. A meta-analysis of 31 studies considered to be of sufficient quality
for inclusion found the strongest evidence for heavy repetitive lifting of
materials, bending and twisting.17 Similar results have been found in other
studies.18,19 There is some evidence for degenerative changes and back pain
being related to heavy general work and patient lifting (in healthcare workers),
but none for any relationship with any particular static posture such as sitting
for extended periods, standing or walking.
3.3.6
3.3.7
It has been suggested that symptoms occurring in the neck may be exacerbated
by the weight of helmets with their attached instrumentation. There is however
no good evidence that the pain is due to degenerative cervical spine disease.
3.3.8
3.3.9
3.3.10 A recent literature review from Canada summarises the change in emphasis in
recent years regarding occupational exposure and lumbar degeneration. In
exploring the genetic influences on the changes in the disc, Batti and
colleagues evaluated the role of occupational exposure and lumbar
degeneration. Their summary states that physical loading specific to
occupation and sport has a relatively minor role in lumbar degeneration.
Instead genetic factors are felt to have a dominant role. They consider genetic
influences explain 74% of variance in adult populations and note the
identification of several gene forms associated with degeneration.23
3.4
Psychosocial factors
3.4.1
3.4.2
3.4.3
Stress, gender and personality traits have been shown to have significant effects
on susceptibility to low back pain following spine loading.26
3.4.4
4.
Prognosis
4.1
The prognosis of any of the forms of degenerative spinal disease is difficult to estimate
with any certainty.
4.1.1
4.1.2
While the incidence of back pain seems to have changed little in the last 15
years, the rate of disability from this cause has increased greatly. In the western
world, the only more frequent cause of absence from work is upper respiratory
infection. This may reflect alterations in societal attitudes.
4.2
4.3
Lumbar spondylosis may advance radiologically, but in most cases this does not cause
any real morbidity. In a small proportion of patients, narrowing of the nerve root canals
or the spinal canal can produce serious symptoms, and even in some cases, paralysis or
bowel and bladder problems.
4.4
Most patients with episodes of acute low back pain from lumbar disc degeneration are
free of symptoms within one week, and almost all are better within 3 months. With
patients who have more severe degenerative changes, their symptoms may fluctuate
and/or progress at a variable rate. Psychosocial factors may have some influence on the
degree of disability. The nerve roots and spinal cord may be compressed as the anatomy
becomes more disrupted. Disc herniations may also give rise to pressure effects, usually
on the spinal nerves, but occasionally on the spinal cord.
4.5
Lumbar facet arthropathy is common, but may or may not be responsible for
producing low back pain in an individual patient. It may certainly contribute to the
overall problem when the normal anatomy and alignment of the spine is disrupted.
5.
Summary
5.1
Cervical spondylosis includes all the changes that occur in the cervical spine.
5.1.2
5.2
5.3
There is a poor correlation between the extent of degenerative disease seen on imaging
and the severity of symptoms or disability. Many people are asymptomatic despite
advanced radiological changes.
5.4
Although the prevalence of degenerative disease of the spine has not changed
significantly in the last 15 years, the amount of perceived disability and absence from
work has increased greatly. This may be related to alterations in attitudes in society.
5.5
The aetiology of symptomatic degenerative disease of the spine is complex and not fully
understood. Repeated loading and torsion producing sub-clinical injury certainly plays
some part, and associations have been established with certain work-related activities,
the most important being repeated heavy lifting, particularly involving bending and
twisting, and with exposure to whole body vibration from using machine tools and
driving motor vehicles. However spondylosis is common in those with sedentary
occupations and research over the past decade, including twin studies, has confirmed
the importance of genetics. A recent literature review found that heredity was the
dominant influence in disc degeneration with sport- and occupation-associated physical
loading playing only a minor part.
5.6
Psychosocial factors are important in defining the degree of disability caused, and
explanatory models are being developed from a systems perspective which bring
together biomechanical, physiological, psychological, psychosocial and biochemical
aspects.
5.7
A cause and effect relationship for the origin of symptoms can be very difficult to
establish in an individual patient.
10
6.
Related synopses
Spondylolisthesis
Low Back Pain
Neck Pain
11
7.
Glossary
annulus fibrosus
arthropathy
cervical
herniation
lumbar
myelopathy
nucleus pulposus
osteophyte
paraesthesiae
psychosocial
radiculopathy
scoliosis
12
8.
References
Canale ST. Campbell's operative orthopaedics. 10th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby; 2003.
Ruddy S, Harris ED, Sledge CB. Kelley's textbook of rheumatology. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;
2001.
3
Dillane JB, Fry J, Kalton G. Acute back syndrome: a study from general practice. Br Med J 1966;2:82-84.
4
Miller JA, Schmatz C, Schultz AB. Lumbar disc degeneration: correlation with age, sex, and spine level in 600
autopsy specimens. Spine 1988;13(2):173-8.
5
Alexander JT. Natural history and nonoperative management of cervical spondylosis. In: Menezes AH,
Sonnatage VH, editors. Principles of spinal surgery. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1996. p. 547-57.
6
Young WF. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a common cause of spinal cord dysfunction in older persons.
Am Fam Physician 2000;62(5):1064-70.
7
O'Neill TW, McCloskey EV, Kanis JA et al. The distribution, determinants, and clinical correlates of vertebral
osteophytosis: a population based survey. J Rheumatol 1999;26(4):842-8.
8
Leonard TA. Lumbar facet arthropathy. In: Frontera WR, Silver JK, editors. Essentials of physical medicine
and rehabilitation. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: Hanley and Belfus Inc; 2002. p. 240-2.
9
Borenstein D. Does osteoarthritis of the lumbar spine cause chronic low back pain? Curr Rheumatol Rep
2004;6(1):14-9.
10
Dutka AJ, Francis TJ. Pathophysiology of decompression sickness. In: Bove A, editor. Bove and Davis' diving
medicine. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1997. p. 159-75.
11
Videman T, Battie MC. The influence of occupation on lumbar degeneration. Spine 1999;24(11):1164-8
12
Ala-Kokko L. Genetic risk factors for lumbar disc disease. Ann Med 2002;34(1):42-7.
13
National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. Musculoskeletal disorders and the workplace: low back
and upper extremities. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
14
Marras WS. Occupational low back disorder causation and control. Ergonomics 2000;43(7):880902.
15
Snook SH. Work-related low back pain: secondary intervention. J Electromyog Kinesiol 2004;14(1):153-60.
16
Vingrd E, Nachemson A. Work-related influences on neck and low back pain. In: Jonsson E, Nachemson A,
editors. Neck and back pain: the scientific evidence of causes, diagnosis, and treatment. Philadelphia, PA:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000. p. 97126.
17
Hoogendoorn WE, van Poppel MN, Bongers PM et al. Physical load during work and leisure time as risk
factors for back pain. Scand J Work Environ Health 1999;25:387-403.
18
Frymoyer JW, Pope MT, Clements JH et al. Risk factors in low-back pain: an epidemiological survey. J Bone
Joint Surg 1983;65A:213-8.
19
Waddell G, Burton AK. Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain at work evidence review. London: Faculty of Occupational Medicine; 2000.
20
Ward M W. Orthopaedics. In: Ernsting J, Nicholson AN, Rainford DJ, editors. Aviation medicine. 3rd ed.
Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann; 1999. p. 358-63.
21
Waddell G. In: The back pain revolution. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1998. p. 85-99.
22
Rollin Stott JR. Vibration. In: Aviation medicine. 3rd ed. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann; 1999. p. 177-91.
23
Batti MC, Videman T, Parent E. Lumbar disc degeneration: epidemiology and genetic influences. Spine
2004;29(23) 2679-90.
24
Boos N, Rieder R, Schade V et al. The diagnosic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging, work perception,
and psychosocial factors in identifying symptomatic disc herniations. Spine 1995;20-2613-7.
25
Svensson HO, Andersson GB. Low back pain in 40 to 47-year old men: work history and work environment
factors. Spine 1983;8:272-6.
26
Marras WS, Davis KG, Heaney CA et al. The influence of psychosocial stress, gender, and personality on
mechanical loading of the lumbar spine. Spine 2000;25(23):3045-54.
27
Waddell G, Main C. In: The back pain revolution. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1998. p. 223-40.
28
National Research Council. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Washington DC: National Academy
Press; 1999.
2
13