Case Interviews Cracked

Case Interviews Cracked

By
Sankalp Kelshikar, Saransh Garg
Copyright 2014 by Sankalp Kelshikar, Saransh Garg
License Statement
This book is licensed for personal use (it may not be resold to anyone) and is free for one and all. However, if you find its
contents useful and believe it deserves any kind of compensation, please use the Amazon or Smashwords.com web-portal
to purchase an e-copy. Thank you for respecting the hard work of the authors.
Table of contents
About the Authors
Acknowledgements
Preface
Chapter 1. Prerequisites and optional resources
Chapter 2. How to use this book
Chapter 3. Skills Development
3.1. Asking Preliminary Questions
3.2. Having and Conveying an Overall Strategy
3.3. Problem Isolation
3.4. Improving Drill Speed
Chapter 4. Conventional vs Evolved Approaches
4.1. Profitability
4.1.1. Conventional vs Evolved Approach
4.1.2. Sample Case 1: Sweets (Using conventional approach)
4.1.3. Sample Case 1: Sweets (Using evolved approach)
4.2. Market Entry
4.2.1. Conventional vs Evolved Approach
4.2.2. Sample Case 2: Chicken Nutrients (Using conventional approach)
4.2.3. Sample Case 2: Chicken Nutrients (Using evolved approach)
Chapter 5. Cases
Guesstimates
Case 3: Guesstimate #1
Profitability cases
Case 8: Logging Company
Case 9: Drug Mafia
Case 10: Mumbai Hotel
Case 11: Fruit Juice Manufacturer
Case 12: Vodka Manufacturer
Case 13: Private Equity Firm
Case 14: Electronics Manufacturer
Case 15: Petrol Pump Owner
Case 16: Delhi Darbar
Case 17: Theatre House
Case 18: Thailand Hotel Chain
Case 19: Book Retailer
Case 20: Petrol Supplier
Case 21: Canada Discount Retailer
Case 22: Fashion Magazine
Market Entry cases
Case 23: Home Safety Equipment
Case 24: Washing Machine
Case 25: Anti-smoking pill
Case 26: Solar Lantern
Pricing cases
Case 27: Anti-balding Pill

For more cases on pricing, refer to Cases: 10, 22, 25 and 30.
Unconventional cases
Case 28: Consulting Firm at IITB
Case 29: Yash Raj Films
Case 30: Godzilla
Case 31: Plot of land
Case 32: Sales force
Appendix:
Data Sheet
We dedicate this book to our Alma Mater, IIT Bombay
About the authors
Sankalp (left) is a Business Analyst at A.T. Kearney. He did his internships at Goldman Sachs and
Dalberg Global Development Advisors, where he decided he wanted to do consulting right out of college.
At IIT Bombay, he was largely involved in the Literary Arts Club and Mood Indigo, IITB's college
cultural festival. Sankalp graduated from IITB with a Dual Degree in Mechanical Engineering.
Saransh (right) is an Associate at the Boston Consulting Group. Previously he interned with Deutsche
Bank and PRS Legislative Research. A Mumbai native, he graduated from IIT-Bombay in 2014
completing his Bachelors in Chemical Engineering. While in IIT, Saransh was an active member of the
Debate Club.
Sankalp and Saransh were part of the same case group during their placements and share a passion for
consulting, scuba diving and entrepreneurship.
You can contact them at contactus@caseinterviewscracked.com
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our gratitude to the many people who saw us through the book, encouraged us
when the chips were down and helped us with the proofreading and designing of it.
We would like to thank the following set of brilliant people who supported this idea and actively
participated in refining the content to bring it to its current form. The extent of their inputs and
involvement was inspiring and helped us successfully cross the finish line. Alphabetically,
Advaith Vishwanath, Akash Goel, Anubhav Jain, Anubhav Mangal, Anusheel Pareek, Anvita Dekhane,
Hardik Mehta, Meghna Sreenivasan, Neehar Jathar, Neha Nathan, Nikhil Patil, Poorna Chandra, Pranay
Bhatia, Rishi Palan, Rushabh Shah, Utkarsh Ohm, Vaibhav Pittie and Vinamra Jain.
We would also like to thank some of our peers and seniors, who assisted us throughout our case
preparation. Without them and their guidance, neither would we have had the content for the book nor the
confidence to communicate the same to our juniors. Alphabetically,
Aarav Singhal, Abhishek Hota, Aditya Poonia, Amit Desai, Anuj Shah, Arnav Dey, Arvind Singh, Dhruva
Shah, Gouri Nawathe, Gururaj Saileshwar, Harsh Jhaveri, Hemanth Peyyeti, Jay Motani, Kshitij Jain,
Madhu Yalamarthi, Mukund Pant, Nikunj Jha, Ninad Kulkarni, Pallavi Jayannavar, Paul Collett, Pranay
Surana, Prasun Agarwal, Prithika Vageeswaran, Raj Binani, Ritanshu Kashyap, Romit Mehta, Ronak
Mehta, Ronnie Philip, Rohan Vadgaonkar, Sailesh Mohapatra, Shashwat Shukla, Shrey Jain, Shreya
Mishra, Siddharth Shanbhag, Souradip Sen, Swapnil Chichani, Tarun Mathur, Urmil Shah and Vani
Venkatesh.
Many thanks to Mayuresh Patole for weaving his magic wand over the creatives on the website, and to
Arun Lodhi and Tushar Saxena for coding it under near-impossible timelines.
We are deeply sorry if we have missed mentioning any of you who have been on this fun journey with us.
Preface
In the first semester of the Academic year 2013-2014 at IIT-Bombay, we were gearing up for placements.
We had our aims set on the top tier consulting firms. Each year and across all IITs that consulting
companies target, the placement timelines follow a similar trajectory.
Resume submission deadlines are fixed around mid-September.
Most students begin their consulting preparation around this time. Since the last two years Victor Chengs
book Case Interview Secrets and his YouTube workshop videos have become the primary source of
choice to gain an understanding of how to solve cases asked in case-interviews. Students also begin to
practice cases amongst themselves referring to university casebooks of HBS, LBS, Wharton and many
others.
Shortlists for the interviews come around mid-October. At this point candidates form case groups of size
3, 4 or 5. Some even are part of two or more groups.
At this point consulting companies appoint mentors or buddies to help students with their preparation.
These are often alumni of the institute working within the firms. Each of the top firms typically appoints
two buddies for every candidate. This marks a great leap in the consulting preparation as now candidates
get access to really good cases and quality feedback from the buddies. These cases are then shared and
exchanged within and between case groups.
On December 1st, or Day 1 of placements almost all consulting firms have their interviews and final
selections are made.
We (Sankalp & Saransh) along with Rishi Palan and Meghna Sreenivasan were part of a rather successful
case group. Rishi got recruited by BCG and Meghna got a PPO from Bain & Company. Since each of us
had multiple shortlists within the Top 4 firms, we vastly benefited from getting very good cases from
buddies and their feedback.
After placement, there was a realization of the stark difference in learning curves before buddies were
appointed and after. Looking back we found certain problems with the preparation phase.
Inadequacy of existing resources

Case in Point
Case in Point is a book still used by candidates. It outlines approaches to solve cases using 12 frameworks
and then has a repository of solved cases. We referred to the book because of a lack of options. Most
candidates find it frustrating to memorize the 12 cases and hence reject the approach. Most cases in the
book have been poorly solved, with leaps of logic rather than a repeatable organized approach.
Resources by Mr. Victor Cheng
Resources offered by Mr. Cheng, such as his book Case Interview Secrets and the free YouTube
workshop videos are now used by almost all candidates. We found these resources the best as a beginners
guide and recommend using them. Mr. Chengs approach basically distills solving cases by remembering
only 3 frameworks. Though this approach serves useful to solve standard profitability and market entry
cases, for the more advanced cases, almost all candidates experienced getting stuck with the frameworks
even when the case demands moving out of them. Though Mr. Cheng highlights how to avoid this, it is
not illustrated sufficiently as few solved cases are provided by him (Even in his LOMS program, cases are
such that they fit nicely with the three frameworks.). Also certain primary skills such as Asking
Preliminary Questions and Having an Overall Strategy which we explain in the book have not been
emphasized with enough examples.
University Casebooks
Before buddies are appointed and even after, students pick cases from university casebooks and give each
other. However, many of these casebooks suffer from a serious lack of depth and quality. Though some
casebooks are better than others and some cases have decent solutions, students often waste time scouting
for good cases. The solutions in these casebooks are given in the form of statements containing the
findings of the case without explaining how a candidate can arrive at those findings from scratch. No
attempt is made to replicate a real conversation between a candidate and interviewer. Also for interviews
in India, you will most likely get Indian context cases which cannot be found in foreign university
casebooks.
Unequal access and dependency on busy buddies

Due to the inadequacy of existing resources, candidates are dependent on buddies to fill the gap in
preparation. Buddies provide good, relevant cases and valuable feedback afterwards. But hey, these
buddies are also working full time at consulting firms and are often out of station and sometimes
unreachable by phone. So they are not always available to give cases.
There is also asymmetry in access to these buddies. A candidate being shortlisted in four firms is
appointed eight buddies whereas a candidate having only one shortlist has only two buddies. This leads to
unequal access to good quality cases and feedback. Candidates often have the time to prepare, but only
limited sources to practice advanced cases from. This means they are not in control of the pace of their
learning even if they are willing to make the efforts.
In this book you will find 32 solved solutions of some of the best cases we came across during our
preparation. We do not claim that the given solutions are the only/best approaches to solving the case.
They are based on our experience, several iterations with peers & buddies during case prep and feedback
from other seniors who are (or have been) in consulting firms. Know that as long as every step you take
while case solving is supported by logic and a few underlying principles (you shall encounter these during
your prep), you are doing well.
You can better understand how you can benefit from this book by familiarizing yourself with the general
structure of the book below.
10
Chapter 1 mentions the essential prior reading to be done before using the book. It also lists optional
resources that can be used parallel to the book.
Chapter 2 outlines how to use this book effectively.
Chapter 3 focuses on key skills required to master cases. These skills have been isolated based on our own
experience and tips from buddies. These are over and above the basic habits you will have adopted after
going through the material in the prerequisites. The Chapter also has examples to illustrate the value
addition of these skills (which should ideally become habits by the time of your interviews).
Chapter 4 discusses the advantage of an evolved approach for case solving as opposed to some of the
conventional approaches. Cases have been solved by both methods for each case type (profitability &
market entry) to showcase the distinction.
Chapter 5 contains a repository of over 32 solved cases. They have been classified as guesstimates,
profitability, market entry, pricing, and unconventional for the benefit of candidates wanting to practice a
certain type of case. Note that there might be overlaps in the types since one case type might include
elements of another. The solutions provided, illustrate good approaches which have worked during actual
case interviews.
The Appendix has a data sheet which contains important data points worth knowing before the case
interview. These are especially useful in guesstimates and pricing (both of which are usual suspects in
case interviews).
Consulting preparation demands investment of time and serious commitment. Candidates are often
preparing for interviews with companies in other fields as well. Through this book we want to provide you
with a one stop solution to address your problems, so that you can concentrate on preparing rather than
looking where to prepare from. We also hope to reduce some of the burden on buddies to give cases.
Candidates can use more of their time to ask about the softer aspects of case-interviewing - questions like
How were your interviews?, How should I handle Day 1, How do consulting companies vary,
How to respond to HR/resume based questions and many more.
You may have many questions during your preparation, please let us know on our website
www.caseinterviewscracked.com.
We wish you good luck for your placements.
Sankalp Kelshikar
Saransh Garg
11
Chapter 1: Prerequisites and optional resources

Solving cases extremely well is a step by step process. You need to know:
(1) What case-interviews are
(2) What are the different types of cases
(3) How different cases are typically solved; and finally
(4) How to become good at solving cases
In this book we focus on (4) since existing resources come close to it, but do not sufficiently cover it.
Mr. Victor Chengs (A former McKinsey consultant and interviewer) resources adequately cover (1), (2)
and (3). Almost all candidates in the last two years have used his resources. As a prerequisite for this book
we suggest you refer to one of the following resources by Victor Cheng:
1) Case Interview Secrets (Book): A Former McKinsey Interviewer Reveals How to Get Multiple Job
Offers in Consulting (Estimated time: 5 days)
OR
2) Case Interview Workshop Videos 1-12 available on YouTube (Estimated time: 2 days)
We recommend using the book, Case Interview Secrets, over the Workshop Videos since things are
explained better in the book. Also, referring back to the book is easier than referring back to the videos for
a particular Chapter. If you have read the book there is no need to go through the videos. However, if you
are short on time, using videos might be a good idea.
Optional Resources
We found the following resources quite helpful during our preparation and we highly recommend you use
them. However they are optional and you can go through them in parallel to using this book.
1) Victor Chengs Look Over My Shoulder Program (LOMS): These are recording of candidates solving
cases given by Mr. Cheng. He gives useful feedback to the candidates and points out their mistakes and
suggests suitable remedies. LOMS will provide you with 8 good cases in addition to the 32 cases in this
book.
2) Victor Chengs Email Newsletters: You can get this by subscribing for free on caseinterview.com. A
range of topics around case interview preparation are covered including job offer stories, tips, and insights
about the consulting world.
12
3) www.caseinterviewmath.com/math: This resource helps in improving your math calculation speed and
accuracy. Doing calculations is an important part of cases, and if you find yourself slow at them use this
resource.
4) Section of Commonly asked Consulting Interview Questions in the book Case in Point: We do not
recommend using the book for learning how to solve cases. However this specific section in the book is
useful.
13
Chapter 2: How to use this book

Practice cases rather than reading them from the book
You can simply read this book up to Chapter 4 since it explains concepts, skills and approaches. Chapter 5
has cases which are best practiced in case groups rather than read to derive maximum value. Case groups
should ideally have 3-4 members. Usually only the interviewer (role play) and candidate should be present
so that the other member(s) can be given the case later. Sometimes, especially initially in your preparation,
it is useful to have the remaining members as observers in the case. That way ideas and approaches can be
exchanged within the group. The observers should not be passive but actively trying to solve the case even
if they dont speak anything.
Once the case has been practiced, apart from the feedback given by the interviewer, you can refer the
solved solution in this book to see where you can improve.
Focus on getting few skills right with every practiced case

Solving cases involve getting multiple skills right. Trying to improve many skills at a time can be a
frustrating and time consuming process with nothing to show eventually. We recommend on concentrating
on any two skills when solving a case. Make sure you are nailing it each time before moving to other
skills. We recommend for the first 10 cases just get the two primary skills Asking Preliminary questions
and Having an overall strategy on track (explained in Chapter 3).
Scrutinize mistakes, incorporate lessons

This is perhaps the most important part of the case solving process. Poring over the mistakes in a solved
case helps you incorporate those lessons and refine your future case solving strategy. Its useful to make
notes on the side of the book for every case to record your past shortcomings and how you plan to rectify
them. This has been found to be a super-efficient way of improving ones case solving.
14
Chapter 3: Skills development

Over two to two-and-a-half months of preparation for the interview, there was a lot of feedback which we
received from seniors and case buddies (Consulting company representatives assigned as temporary
mentors) to improve case interview skills. These are skills difficult to develop on your own without
someone telling you and you taking active steps to refine them. This feedback led to a vast improvement
of our case-interview skills. The focus of this Chapter is to bring to your notice these skills so that you can
incorporate them from the very start of your preparation. The following are the skills which would be
explained further in the respective Chapters.
3.2. Having and Conveying an Overall Strategy & Sub-Strategies
3.3. Problem Isolation Tools
-Segmentation
-Company Specific or Industry Wide issue
-Hypothesis driven approach
3.4. Improving Drill Speed (If there are 4 possible causes to a problem, knowing how to assign priority to
the investigation process to reach the solution faster)
-Using the 80/20 rule
-Benchmarking with competition
-Using Business insights
Apart from these skills we will introduce you to approaches to solve cases which are better than the
approaches in conventional resources. The conventional approaches compromise on quality and time
taken to solve on the case in exchange for simplicity. We will cover these evolved approaches in Chapter
4: Conventional vs. Evolved Approaches
We will not go into details of other important skills, since they are either obvious, or easy to understand or
are explained well by Victor Cheng in his book or online videos. We will simply state them as follows:
a) Communicating your thought process to the interviewer
b) Synthesizing the case (Typically state Recommendation with three supporting reasons)
15

Youre given a problem statement like Client ABC which is part of the X industry has lost 20% profits,
please suggest recommendations to turnaround the problem. The next thing to do is ask some preliminary
questions. This is the most underestimated part of the case interview. Its importance cannot be stressed
enough.
The reason we use the phrase Preliminary Questions instead of Clarifying Questions is because you
should not only be clarifying the initial problem statement but actively seeking pieces of information
which helps in understanding the client's company.
This is not only about re-confirming the information that the interviewer has given but also seeking out
information that he has NOT given.
Preliminary questions help you to scope out the problem, setting the boundary walls in which analysis
needs to be done. It also enables you to get a look and feel of your clients company.
At the same time it communicates to the interviewer that you're thinking of the different angles to the
problems and are checking what needs to be done. Here are different types of preliminary questions to
ask:
3.1.1. Clarifying the objectives

Profitability cases
In standard profitability cases, usually, there is little ambiguity like
"Our client is an electronics manufacturing company. You are hired to find out why our profits in the
mobile division have decreased by 20% in the last year".
However there are ambiguous questions also for example,
"Our client is an electronics manufacturing company with a sales stagnation issue in its mobile division.
Find out what is happening"
There are several ambiguities here. Sales could mean revenues or #units sold. You dont know what are
the different divisions of the company and if the mobile divisions sales can be treated and analyzed
independently. Youre not sure of why stagnation of profits is even a problem, because at the end of the
day the company is still profitable. These can be good questions to ask:
What are the different divisions of the company? Do I have to look at stagnation in the mobile division
only?
How much were our sales growing by earlier, since when has there been stagnation?
16
Why is stagnation of sales even a problem?(Did the company expect them to keep growing, why did it
have this expectation)
By sales do you mean revenue or #units sold?
These may look like several questions but in a conversation they will take very little time since many of
them have a simple 'yes' or 'no' response. These questions can uncover a lot of useful information which
can be used to progress quickly in your case. For example if in response to question (c) the interviewer
tells you that the industry is growing and hence there was an expectation for the company to grow as well,
you can quickly move through the rest of the case by benchmarking the company's profit structure to that
of competitors and get to the bottom of the stagnation problem.
Also you dont want to be in a situation where you miss out some important info either because the
interviewer forgot to explicitly state it(he/she has been conducting interviews for several hours) or because
you misunderstood profitability(usually profit as a % of revenue) for profits.
Market Entry cases

A typical market entry case statement looks like this...
Our client is X company and they are wondering if they should enter the Y market?
This is a very ambiguous question. The problem here is that the decision to enter Y market can be based
on different reasons such as
- Clients ability to capture a market share target in the first year
- Clients ability to achieve a profit target in the first two years
- Strategic reasons (long term profit); Example- Amazon entered the e-reading market through Kindle
even though it was a zero profit venture. The price of Kindle was so low that they were just breakingeven. The strategic reason for entering the e-reading market was so that they can push sales of their digital
books.
A good clarifying question to ask to find out what an attractive market means according to the client is
a) What metric should we use to decide if we should enter the market or not?
The response of the interviewer could be
a1) Lets get an idea of what profits we can expect in the first year or We want to at least break-even in
the first year. Now there is a lot more clarity and you can proceed to calculate expected profits in the
first year.
17
a2) We want to develop a qualitative understanding of the business and see if we can overcome the
challenges Now you know that case is light on numbers and is about qualitatively assessing the market
and gauging if the company can compete in it.
Another good question to ask is

b) Is there any reason why the company is considering market Y in particular?
Usually the response of the interviewer is that there is no particular reason. However sometimes you can
uncover useful information such as Market Y is growing fast or Market Y is similar to our home
market in Z way.
Guesstimates
Questions about clarifying objectives with respect to guesstimates should try to be about scoping out the
problem and knowing what to estimate and what not to. This is best illustrated with an example:
If the question is estimate the #cars in Mumbai, good clarifying questions would be to check if we are
looking at both passenger cars and cabs, whether were looking at both first and second hand cars.
These questions would be subjective to case. The guiding rule is to be crystal clear of the objective and
know the boundary walls (scope) of the problem.
3.1.2. Understanding Client's Company (Applies to all types of cases)

Product
You should know what exactly the product that the company sells is. So if the interviewer says that the
client is a watch manufacturer, you should ask what type of watch?-wrist watch, wall clocks, and alarm
clocks, all of them? This question is important because if you make an assumption that the client is in the
wrist watch market instead of the wall clock market, it can bite you later in the case when, lets say, you
have to suggest suitable marketing strategies. Do the same if the interviewer says Personal Digital
Assistant (PDA) manufacturer. If you forget to clarify initially, you can clarify the information later, but
you lose precious time analyzing from the point of view of a different product.
Geography
18
You should know the location of the business youre dealing with because the context directly relates to
several aspects of the business. Example
- Facebooks penetration in Rural India is restricted by low internet availability.
- The market size for Porsche would be greater in USA than in India.
Value Chain
This is a simple value chain:
Production --> Distribution --> Retailing
It is useful to know upfront which part of the value chain the company operates in as it better helps you
figure out what the company can control and what it cant.
Together-product, geography and value chain-give you a good look and feel of the company, makes it
easy for you to visualize the company and puts you in a comfortable spot to analyze the rest of the case.
3.1.3. Spidey-Sense info (Applies to all types of cases)

By this we mean any information or technical term which tingles your Spidey-Sense or is a little
ambiguous or something youre not 100% sure of. For example,
The client is a bank and their profits have gone down, they suspect its because of a higher delinquency
rate, they want you to figure out how to solve the problem.
Here you want to know what is delinquency rate, how exactly is it calculated and how it can be broken
down. Even though you know the term conceptually you want to know exactly how it is calculated to
better understand its drivers.
Remember you should also ask questions to clarify the new information during the course of the case.
19
3.2. Having and Conveying an Overall Strategy

After asking the requisite preliminary questions to understand the problem statement and the Clients
company, you must proceed by laying out the Overall Strategy to solve the case. There are two parts here:
3.2.1. Overall Strategy
3.2.2. Sub-Strategies
3.2.1. Overall Strategy

What is an overall strategy?
As the name suggests, this is like a Table of contents for the case interview. After agreeing on the scope of
the interview (by asking preliminary questions), proposing an overall strategy helps the interviewer
understand what you plan on doing in the next 25-30 minutes. Typically, it is simply a breakdown of the
case into simpler parts, the analysis of which will help you give direction to the subsequent parts you are
tackling and eventually to the final recommendations.
Why is it important?
The biggest advantage of this habit is seen in cases which have no set pattern of solving (for instance,
market entry OR unconventional). The challenge here is to sketch out a pattern because without it, you
could be left analyzing issues that do not tie back to the objective of the case. Understand that if you are
lost in a case, the interviewer is probably doubly lost. Not only is this a waste of precious time, but also is
particularly annoying for the interviewers. It is better to invest some time early in the case to agree on a
strategy that will work. Additionally, if your approach is not the best way to tackle the problem, it also
gives the interviewer a chance to correct you.
How to go about framing one?

Lets say there is a market entry case about introducing a luxury car in the Indian market. After asking the
requisite preliminary questions, you can state your overall strategy as follows:
First, I will estimate the potential profits that can be made in the Indian market for the Car.
After establishing that this will be a sufficiently profitable venture for Company, I will find out the
feasibility of setting up the entire value chain.
20
Finally, we can discuss the potential challenges after which I will give my final recommendation to the
client.
A more detailed discussion of specific Overall Strategies is done in Chapter 4: Conventional vs.
Evolved Approach to cases.
3.2.2. Sub-Strategies
After the interviewer agrees with you on the overall strategy to solve the case, it is time to tackle each part
of the strategy. Regard the time between each part like a checkpoint. To make sure you and the
interviewer are on the same page, you should do two things here:
(a) Sub-strategy: For each part of your overall strategy give a sub-strategy to tackle that part
(b) Mini-Synthesis: Draw out inferences from the previous part before beginning the next part
Sub-strategy is for the individual parts of the case, what overall strategy is for the entire case.
As you move from one part to another, laying out your inference tells the interviewer that you are able to
gather insights and make sense of the information. If the interviewer does not agree with your inference, it
gives you an opportunity to engage in a debate. Moreover, consistent mini-syntheses will help you
structure the final recommendation quicker and possibly better since you will have identified the key
issues already.
Example:
Following from the earlier luxury car example, say we have finished the first part of the case, of
estimating overall profits and moving onto the next part of checking feasibility of value chain:
We have found that we can expect to make $50 MN in profits in two years which is above our threshold
of breaking-even for entering the market. (This is the mini-synthesis)
Now, I wish to talk about how we can set up the value chain here. Here I will look at (1) car
manufacture/import, (2) distribution options (3) Retailing & marketing avenues. Is that fine?
(This is the Sub-strategy for the next part)
21
3.3. Problem Isolation Tools

Often in a case you have a problem such as Profits are down by 30%. You need to isolate the problem to
its specific cause. For this we have the tools below:
3.3.1 Segmentation
What is segmentation?
Segmentation is breaking a problem into smaller, simpler parts.
Why is it important?
Segmentation is important to narrow down a broad problem into a more nuanced and specific problem.
Example- Narrowing down the broad problem of Revenues guitar sales is down by 10% to a specific
problem of sales having declined of the electric guitar segment due to a production issue.
Here the segmentation was done as follows:
How to segment?
Segmentation can be done in different MECE (Mutually Exclusive & Comprehensively Exhaustive) ways
-Geography
-Value chain
-Product parameter: Color, Price, Size
-Distribution channels
22
Mathematical break-down
Example - Lets say volume of Bottled Water sold is down: We can analyze the decrease across
geography or across bottle sizes (25L, 1L, 500ml, 250ml)
However segmentation should be such that
a) Segmentation is Simple
b) Segmentation is Reasonable
c) Information of component parts is easily obtainable
a) Segmentation is Simple:
We will explain this through an example. Lets say for a particular case, we want to segment the fuel
transportation cost of trucks.
This is the complicated way of segmenting all at once.
Transport Cost= (#Trucks) x (#Trips per Truck) x (Distance travelled per trip)/ (Avg. mileage) x (Cost of
fuel)
While the above segmentation is correct, here is a simpler way of doing the same segmentation
Transport Cost= (#Trucks) x (Cost per Truck)
= (#Trucks) x (#Trips per Truck) x (Cost per Trip)
= (#Trucks) x (#Trips per Truck) x (Fuel per Trip) x (Cost of fuel)
= (#Trucks) x (#Trips per Truck) x (Distance travelled per trip)/ (Avg. mileage) x (Cost of fuel)
There are two key advantages of segmentation in a simple and progressive manner instead of all at once
1) Avoids unnecessary analysis: You often do not need the entire segmentation. Lets say we were
segmenting to do a competitor benchmarking of why our fuel costs are higher compared to competitors. If
we find out that we have more #Trucks but our (Cost per Truck) is at par, then we dont even need to
break-up (Cost per Truck) further. So you avoid unnecessary segmentation.
2) Easier to Follow: While segmenting all at once can be faster and sometimes useful, it is not easy for the
interviewer to follow in a conversation. Also, when simultaneously using so many variables in the
equation there is a risk of making a mistake from your end.
23
b) Segmentation is Reasonable: When segmenting why Guitar Sales are down, unless there is sound logic
it would not be reasonable to segment guitar sales by gender of customers.
c) Information of component parts is easily obtainable

Its better to break down monthly revenue of a coffee shop as,
Monthly revenue= (#Transactions in a month) x (Spend per transaction); instead of
Monthly revenue= (#Unique Customers per month) x (#Transaction per customer) x (Spend per
Transaction)
Since its difficult to keep track of #Unique Customers but easier to keep track of #Transactions and
Spend per transaction. Unless knowing #Unique Customers is crucial to your analysis avoid segmenting
that way. Also notice that the former segmentation is Simpler than the latter.
How to use Segmentation? Ask What has changed within the segments
Candidates when segmenting often lose track of why they are segmenting. Suppose if profits have
changed (reduced), then something somewhere has gone wrong or changed to cause the change in profits.
By segmenting we are trying to get at what specifically has CHANGED. So its important to not only
segment but also ask WHAT HAS CHANGED.
For example:
Lets say profit margins(Profit margin=Profit/Revenue) for guitar sales has gone down and we know there
are two channels for distribution- Company owned stores and third-party stores.
Since overall profit margin will depend on profit margins of each channel as well as the revenue split
across both channels,
Think about this

Profit Margin= (% Revenue from Company stores) x (Profit Margin of Company Stores) + (%Revenue
from Third-party stores) x (Profit Margin from Third-party stores)....
Its not enough to know the current profit margin and split in revenues of each segment. You need to ask if
the profit margin for each segment has CHANGED or if the revenue split has CHANGED to identify what
is causing the problem.
You will remember to ask what has changed only when, before asking about a particular segmentation,
you know how you will use that segmentation. Most candidates ask questions to gather info and then
24
decide how to make sense of that. This means they will ask questions like what type of distribution
channels we have, but since they dont know beforehand how they will make sense of the information,
they often forget asking the second question of WHAT HAS CHANGED in the distribution channel.
Closing remark on segmentation: Once we have segmented, its also important to prioritize which segment
to analyze first, since it improves how quickly you arrive at the root cause of the problem. We will see this
in section 3.4 where we talk of the 80/20 rule.
3.3.2. Company Specific or Industry Wide issue

When trying to identify the range of possible reasons for a problem like reduced profits, consultants need
to know where to look. Knowing whether a profit problem is company specific or an industry-wide issue
helps them prioritize where to look. This holds especially true in a case interview as well.
Example: Revenues have reduced by 50% and client wants to know what can be done to resolve the
problem.
Revenue=Price x Volume
Lets say revenue decline is as a result of reduced volume while price has remained constant. Lets say,
after asking, we know that the problem of volume decline is a company specific issue as opposed to an
industry wide issue. This question now also allows you to eliminate certain branches of reasoning.
Because you know that Volume reduction is a company specific issue, you now know a more likely
reason for it is customers preferring competitors over us rather than all customers moving to a substitute
product. You will focus your analysis on finding company-specific causes rather than potential industrywide causes. Hence again this is a problem isolation tool.
3.3.3. Hypothesis driven approach

Many times you will hear that your case interview approach should be hypothesis driven. What does
this mean? Dont worry, its very simple.
In Consultingdom if the cause of the problem is A, B, C or D, then a hypothesis driven approach is one
where you first assume A is the problem and check whether that is true or not, and you do the same for
B,C,D. In consulting an outcome is presumed and then the presumption is validated or invalidated.
Now all of us use a hypothesis driven approach naturally. The only difference is we dont assume an
outcome. So if we know the potential cause of a problem is A, B, C, or D, we proceed to investigate each
potential problem and in the end come with an outcome-A, B, C or D.
Now given that we are implicitly using a hypothesis driven approach, what does it mean when someone
tells you to be hypothesis driven? It means either youre mental process of thinking is not hypothesis
driven or youre not communicating your mental process of thinking effectively.
25
Here is a concrete example to illustrate the point further. Lets say the candidate needs to find why
Revenues have declined.
Non-hypothesis driven approach

We know revenues have declined. I want to find out why.
Have customers stopped preferring our products?
Which product segment has shown the decline in volume?
Is there a price war in the industry?
Hypothesis driven approach without effective communication

We know revenues have declined. I want to find out why. Do we know if price has changed?
No, it has not changed.
So our volume has declined?
Yes.
Has the industry market size declined overall?
No, it has remained constant.
Then, our market share must have reduced, is that correct?
Yes.
Hypothesis driven approach with effective communication

We know revenues have declined.
This could be because of a Price decline or Volume decline.
Do we know how price and volume have changed in the same time period?
Price has remained the same, Volume has declined proportionate to Revenue.
26
Since we know Volume decline is the problem,

It could be because the Market size has reduced or the client's market share has reduced.
Do we know how has each metric has changed?
The market size has remained the same for the industry, our market share has reduced.
27
3.4. Improving Drill Speed

If there are four possible causes to a problem, then by drilling through each branch we try getting to the
bottom of each possible cause to either,
-
Identify it as a cause for the problem or
Eliminate it as a reason.
In Consultingdom its important to assign priority to the different analysis that can be done and be
selective about which ones to do. Doing a particular analysis costs time and money. Similarly, you have a
30 min interview, 5 mins go into chit-chat, few HR questions here and there. Most case interviews get
over in 25mins. You want to move through a case fast. Here are some ways of doing that
3.4.1 Using the 80/20 rule

The 80/20 rule here signifies analyzing the branch responsible for 80% of the problem first and then
analyzing the branch responsible for 20% of the problem.
In short, analyze the more important things first. You need to know the weights of sub-parts to a problem
and choose which sub part to analyze first.
Lets say costs are up by 50%. You need to find out why. You know that 60% of the cost is Raw-Materials
and 40% is Manufacturing cost. If both costs have gone up by 50%, you should begin by analyzing why
raw material cost has gone up rather than manufacturing cost since that is the bigger chunk of the problem.
In the previous example if, lets say Raw Material costs still make 60% of costs and Manufacturing makes
40%. The difference is that manufacturing cost has increased by 100% and raw material cost has increased
by about 15%, then the bigger chunk of the problem is coming from rise in Manufacturing costs. So now
you should analyze Manufacturing before Raw-Materials. Dont analyze raw materials just because it is
the bigger chunk of overall costs.
3.4.2 Competitor benchmarking

Benchmarking different metrics with respect to competitors better helps distinguish where we are lagging
behind industry. Lets say the reason why we are losing market share to competitors is because of a higher
price of our product which in turn is because of a higher cost of our product. Lets say cost comprises of
manufacturing, distribution and marketing related costs. Now its useful to benchmark each of these costs
with respect to competitors to get a sense of where we are lagging behind industry. If our distribution cost
is twice as much as industry but production and marketing costs are almost the same, then distribution cost
should be analyzed further even if on an absolute scale our production & marketing costs are greater than
distribution costs.
28
3.4.3 Business insight

Sometimes business insights can help you gauge which branch to drill first. This should be used carefully
since your assumptions of the business may lead you to assign a wrong priority of drilling. Its important
to use this in conjunction with the previous two ways of drilling effectively.
Business judgment is about knowing what factors are relevant in a given context. For example, from the
customer point of view, after sales service is important when selling laptops, but less important when
selling guitars. For retailers, shelf life is an important concern for food items but less important for
stationary.
Another place where you can demonstrate business judgment is when finding root cause of a problem.
Lets say, the client which is in the business of manufacturing laptops, is losing market share to
competitors. We already know that there are no production or distribution issues, its the customer demand
that has decreased for our product. Now we need to find the root cause for this reduced customer demand.
There could be several parameters which could be compared with competition for this:
Customer Characteristics
-Customer segments (age group, gender, income, geography, type of requirement) targeted
Product Characteristics
-Laptop price
-Specifications-battery life, hard disk, RAM, graphics, monitor size, etc.
-After sales services, complimentary products
-Brand image
Sales and Marketing
-No. of Retail outlets, location of outlets, visibility in stores, sales representatives
-Discounts & offers
-Online marketing
This is a big list and its not a good idea to indiscriminately go over them one by one. Instead, using
business judgment, you can pick and prioritize few key issues, before moving to others.
So for example in this case, you can pick
Laptop Price
29
Specifications
Brand Image
as the most important differentiators between companies where we maybe lagging behind.
'Wrong customer segment being targeted' would be a low priority issue since most laptop companies like
Dell target customers across all age-groups, gender, geography, income etc. (There are exceptions. Apple
targets the premium segment, so useful to get a general sense of the type of company and customers
targeted beforehand.)
Most laptop companies have reasonable after sales service mechanisms. Most companies also have their
products available on all retail channels with more or less equal visibility. Hence these are less likely to be
important differentiators that customers care about. (Again, there may be instances when these could be
important. Lets say the client is a new entrant in the market, then visibility to customers becomes a
priority issue.)
So, in summary using business insights you can arrive at the important issues faster.
Business judgment is best developed through professional experience. The next best alternative is to be
reading business articles. We recommend Bloomberg Businessweek and Economic Times/Business
Standard, if time permits.
30
Chapter 4: Conventional vs Evolved approaches

Most candidates after referring to conventional resources tend to solve cases in a particular way. Though
candidates differ in their intrinsic abilities there is a common under-link to their approach which we call
the conventional way of solving the case. Over a period of two months, candidates incorporate tweaks into
their approaches to make themselves more effective in solving cases.
In this section we will suggest a few very important tweaks to the conventional approach. This new
approach is what we call the evolved one since it has evolved out of an iterative process of making
multiple minor modifications to the conventional approach after receiving feedback from seniors and
buddies. Beyond just stating the difference between the two approaches we will illustrate through sample
cases-one profitability & one market entry- of how the evolved approach is more beneficial.
There are two sections under which we will discuss the contrasting approaches
4.1: Profitability Cases
4.2: Market Entry Cases
31
4.1. Profitability Cases

Profitability Cases are the most common form of cases. The problem statement is usually like this
Our Client AB, part of the X industry, has been experiencing a revenue decline of 10% over the last 3
years, they wish to hire you to turnaround the situation.
We will now show you how to effectively tackle these types of cases. The following three sub-sections
will be covered
4.1.1: Conventional Vs. Evolved Approach
4.1.2. Sample Case 1: Sweets (Conventional approach)
4.1.3. Sample Case 1: Sweets (Evolved approach)
32

Lets say we need to find why the client is experiencing a revenue decline of 10% from last year.
The Conventional Approach to solve the case goes like this
1. We use the Profitability Framework* to figure out which metric is causing the revenue decline. Lets
say we find that price has remained constant and volumes have declined by 10%
2. In the second step, we use Business Situation Framework* to figure out why the volumes have
reduced by 10%
*Refer to Victor Chengs Case Interview Secrets or his YouTube videos if you dont know what these frameworks
are.
In the Evolved Approach to solve the case, we can add more steps of segmentation (by geography, product
type, distribution channels, etc.) before moving to the Business Situation Framework, especially if a
segmentation has been given to us by the interviewer. This is done to further isolate the problem to a
particular segment. Of potential segmentations, segmentation by Value-Chain has proved to be very
useful.
So here, after we know it is Volume decline that is causing the problem, we should isolate the problem
along the Value Chain: Production Issue->Distribution Push Issue->Customer Pull Issue.
Volumes could have declined either due to:
1. Production Issue-We are not able to produce as much as before.
2. Distribution Push Issue-Our products are not being pushed by the Distributors & Retailers as much as
before. This could be due to fewer distribution channels, lower margins being provided to distributors
relative to competitors, inconvenient packaging, not enough visibility in the stores etc.
3. Customer Pull Issue-This means there is reduced demand from the Customer/Consumer end for our
product.
Hence the Evolved Approach has the following three steps
1. We use the Profitability Framework to figure out which metric is causing the revenue decline.
2. Assuming Volume decline is the problem, isolate this problem across segments that are known or
given by the interviewer. Remember to always segment across the Value Chain.
3. We find out why the problem exists at that part of the Value Chain using the Business Situation
Framework
The benefit of this modification is it allows you to isolate the problem to a specific part of the value chain
thereby leading you to the cause of the problem more easily. We will demonstrate the benefit of this
approach through a sample profitability case. Apart from the benefit of using the Evolved Approach we
will also highlight the benefit of asking the Preliminary Questions and using MECE Segmentation as
explained in Section 3.1 and 3.2.1 respectively.
Note that the following sample case, solved using the Conventional Approach, is actually how we solved
the case as candidates after a month of preparation.
33
It would be preferable if you can have your friend give the following sample case. For this purpose he/she
can read section 4.1.3. where the case is solved using the Evolved Approach. If you cant find someone to
give you the case you can keep reading ahead, but try to solve the case yourself as you read.
34
4.1.2. Sample Case 1: Sweets (Conventional approach)

Your client is an Indian sweets manufacturer who is facing a decline in profits. He wants your help. How
will you proceed? Assume I am the client.
I would like to begin by asking a few clarifying questions:

How much have the profits reduced by and in what time-frame?
Profits have reduced by 20% in the last 2-3 months.
What is the Geography in which the client is selling the product?
The client is selling the product all over India.
I would now like to analyze the profit structure of the company to know why profits are declining.
So we know that #Units sold have declined which is causing our decline in Profits. Do we know if this is
an industry-wide trend or Company specific?
We have no information on that.
Alright, to understand more about the business, I would like to analyze four aspects of the business
1. Customers
2. Competition
3. Product
4. Company
Notice here that after using the Profitability framework to find the metric responsible for Profit
decline, the candidate is directly moving onto the Business Situation Framework.
35
1. Customers
Has the market size for sweets increased or decreased?
Its remained the same in the last 2-3 months.
What are the customer segments in the market?
Why do you want to segment customers?
I want to see if any particular customer segment of customers is facing the problem.
What kind of segmentation are you looking for?
Age, gender, geography, type of sweet?
We know that all geographic segments have experienced a decline, and we do not have data for age,
gender segmentation. We have just 1 type of sweet we sell.
Is there any reason why the needs of the customers may have changed when it comes to buying sweets?
None that we can think of. Why do you think they should change in such a small span of time?
We are not selling as much as before, so I was thinking.
What are the preferred distribution channels for the customers?
We sell our products through third party distributors who sell it to three types of retailers
- Large retailers (10%)
- Medium retailers (30%)
- Small retailers like Paan shops (60%)
I have not seen sweets or mithai being sold in Paan Shops, what kind of sweets are these?
We sell toffees, like a Mentos toffee.
Oh ok!
Have any of the distribution channels taken a greater hit than the others?
Good question. Paan shops have largely shown all the volume decline.
36
I would now like to move to the second branch of analysis. I would like to analyze it in conjunction with
the 3rd branch of product to do a competitor benchmarking of our product.
2. Competition & 3. Product

Who are our competitors?
There are too many of them in the fragmented market.
I would like to benchmark our product with other typical toffees on different product parameters like
Price, Quality, Taste, Packaging...
Wait, what is your hypothesis here?
I am seeing if there is any reason why customers will prefer other toffees.
Think of it practically. When you go to a toffee shop, how do you choose which toffee to buy?
Hmm the prices are the same, I just choose one, do not really care of the differences.
Yes, it is a commoditized product, small differences do not really matter to the customer. You should think
on a different track.
I am kind of lost, we know that there is no particular reason why the market size has reduced and also no
reason to believe why customers will prefer to buy other toffees over our product.
Hmm why dont you analyze the distribution and retailing aspect of the toffee?
Alright, have the margins being paid to distributors and small retailers comparable to other toffee
companies because of which they are pushing our product less?
Yes, toffees are a low value product 50p, 1 Re so they even dont care much if there are minor differences.
.....*Thinking*....
Alright,
Lets say we know that toffees are reaching the Pan shops as before. But from the Pan shop they are
somehow not reaching to the customers? Now what do you think could be the reason for this?
It could be that the shopkeeper does not have space to keep the toffees in his shop.
Or because the toffees are not kept in a place that customers can see them or is inaccessible to the panwala.
The toffees are kept in jars in front of the pan-wala.
37
.....*Thinking*....
Well we can stop here. It so happens that the containers in which the toffees were kept were changed by
the distributor. The new ones had narrower necks which made it difficult for the shopkeeper to hand out
the toffees to his customers.
Discussion
Well, as you can guess, this was not the best way to solve the case. Dont worry if you did something
similar in your attempt, it is indeed a challenging case at first. Before you see how this case is solved by
the Evolved approach we would like to bring to your notice some of the shortcomings of the candidate
here and you can see later how it gets rectified
1. Preliminary questions about the product not asked which led to the candidate confusing sweets with
mithai. The candidate also was not sure which part of the value chain the sweets manufacturer
operates in and could have asked a question about it earlier.
2. The candidate directly went from the Profitability framework to the Business situation framework
without isolating the problem along the Value chain. This is fine, although it helps to isolate the
problem as early into the case as possible.
3. In the latter part of the case when asked for potential reasons why toffees are not reaching customers
even though they reach the Pan-Shops, the candidates approach was of trial & error instead of a
MECE Segmentation
38
4.1.3. Sample Case 1: Sweets (Evolved approach)

Your client is an Indian sweets manufacturer who is facing a decline in profits. He wants your help. How
will you proceed? Assume I am the client.
Preliminary questions
How much have our profits declined by?
There has been a decline of 20%.
For how long has the company been experiencing this decline?
Its a recent issue, since the last 2-3 months.
What exactly is our product?
These are toffees, like a Mentos.
Which regions have seen this problem?
All of India.
Where do we lie in the value chain?
We send the toffees to the distributor who sends them to large retail stores, medium retail stores and small
stores like Paan shops. They further sell the toffees to the end customers who buy them.
Is this a company specific issue or have others in the company seen this trend as well?
We have no information of that.
Overall Strategy
Lets begin by finding where the reduction in profits coming from is. Then we can understand why this
problem is happening and how to turn it around.
39
We know that we reach out to customers via Pan Shops, Small Retailers and Large Retailers.
Do we know the split in sales of each type of retailer and how much of a decline in sales is each channel
facing?
Small Retail (Pan Shops): 60% sales
Medium Retail: 30%
Large Retail: 10%
Paan shop sales have taken a hit, while other channels have not seen a decline.
Since the segmentation of Distribution Channels was already given by the interviewer its always
useful to use the segmentation early on in the case.
Since # of units is reducing in the Pan Shop segment, I want to identify the problem in the value chain.
The problem could be because of
1. Production Issue -> 2. Distribution Push Issue -> 3. Customer Pull Issue
Has our production capacity reduced stifling the number of toffees we can produce?
No. It is same as before.
Are we able to supply distributors as many toffees as they demand?
Yes.
Are all toffees reaching from the distributors to the pan walas?
Yes.
So either
1. The shopkeeper is not selling (pushing) the toffees to his customers or
2. The customers are buying someone elses products over ours
3. The market for toffees itself has reduced, however I doubt that the market for toffees will suddenly
reduce in a span of 2-3 months.
Good.
My hypothesis is that the customers are not buying our products.

Okay. How will you test it?
Is it a commodity product or a differentiable product?
40
If it is a differentiable product, we will need to do a competitive analysis on product parameters (flavor,

size, price etc.), distribution channels (customer preferences) and marketing.
If it is a commodity product, then some of these factors are irrelevant.
It is a commodity product. No distinction in product, distribution channels or marketing.
Although the interviewer gives away the commodity bit of info here, it is useful to suggest your
opinion and verify it with the interviewer.
Okay. So the product sales are largely driven by the shopkeepers. I want to understand why our products
are not being pushed to the customers as much.
Good.
Good job. It so happens that the containers in which the toffees were kept were changed by the distributor.
The new ones had narrower necks which made it difficult for the shopkeeper to hand out to his customers.
Discussion
In this approach after the candidate identified the problem of volume decline, he isolated it across the
value-chain instead of directly moving to the business situation framework. The fact that he was able to
isolate it as a distribution push issue meant that the business situation framework was not required at all.
Asking the preliminary question about the product meant there was no confusion as before. Also asking
about where we lie in the value chain helped later when we moved from the profitability framework to the
isolation of the problem across the Value-Chain.
Lastly, the candidate was more effective in thinking of potential Retail Push issues. Instead of thinking of
41
them in a trial and error manner, the candidate logically breaks the several issues down in a MECE
manner.
42
4.2. Market Entry

We would like to directly begin with the advanced techniques to solve the market entry cases. The
prerequisite for this section is that you know what a typical market entry case looks like and have general
idea of how to approach it. If youre unaware of this, we recommend you go through Victor Chengs
online video on YouTube titled, Business Situation Case Interview Framework (Video 7 of 12) or the
chapter titled Business Situation Framework in his book Case Interview Secrets.
Optionally you can also practice the first case of his Look Over My Shoulder (LOMS) program, which is a
Market entry case.
We would cover the following three sub-sections
4.2.2: Sample Case 2: Chicken Nutrients (Using conventional approach)
4.2.3: Sample Case 2: Chicken Nutrients (Using evolved approach)
43
4.2.1. Conventional Vs. Evolved Approach

After asking the right Preliminary questions, the next aspect of Market Entry is the overall strategy. There
is the conventional approach which is what most candidates use initially after referring popular resources.
We recommend using the Evolved approach instead. Till now during placement time, everyone starts off
using the conventional method but after two months of receiving constant feedback from seniors and
buddies, people start using the Evolved approach. We want you to begin using it early on to get much
better at solving cases faster.
Below we will give you a brief overview of the two approaches followed by solving a case through either
method. Our objective is to ease you into the Evolved approach and for you to see the benefit of using it
for yourself.
A conventional approach to market entry looks like this:

To understand whether the client should enter the market or not,
Start asking questions under these 4 buckets, and see if you can qualitatively tick off each bucket.
Customer
Competition
Product
Company
Who are our

customers?
Who are our

competitors?
Commodity or
differentiable good?
Capabilities and
expertise
What are the customer

segments?
What is the market

share of each?
What are its

complementary goods?
Distribution channel
Size and growth rate of

each segment?
Behavior(target
segment, product
characteristics)
What are its

substitutes?
Investment cost
Product characteristicslifecycle, etc.
Organizational
structure
Cost-structure
What are the needs of

each segment?
Distribution Channels
preferred?
Price Sensitivity?
What are their best

practices?
Barriers to entry?
Supplier
concentration?
Customer
concentration and
power?
If all 4 buckets are favorable, then the client should enter the Market, else not.
44
The benefit of this approach is, it covers a good breadth of questions which could help you solve the case.
However the problems with this approach are:
a) Not goal-oriented-This leads to candidates asking questions, which are part of the check-list above,
but not relevant to the case. This is because this conventional approach is not goal-oriented. If our
goal is to estimate Profits, every question asked should help in arriving closer to that.
These are different from preliminary questions as discussed in Section 3.1 which are useful and should
not be confused with non-goal oriented questions.
b) Overlapping questions-Questions such as What are the product characteristics occur twice, once for
Competitors branch and then in the Product branch.
c) Not quantitative enough-If estimating potential profits is an objective then there needs to be a proactive effort in striving for numbers.
Profits= (Market Size) X (Market Share) X (Profit per unit)-Fixed Costs.
Instead of qualitatively gauging if the customer & competitive scenario is favorable there should be an
attempt to try and put a number to the market size and the market share to calculate the profits. Being
quantitative leads you to ask better and more pointed question.
d) Forgetting Value Chain feasibility-Candidates often estimate the profits but do not check if its
practically possible to establish the value chain from Production to marketing.
These problems are done away with in the Evolved approach. We call it evolved since it has evolved out
of the conventional approach after making several iterations to improve it.
Fundamentally, you should still keep a mental check-list of the questions of the conventional approach,
but the evolved method helps you deploy only those questions which help you solve the case.
The Evolved approach looks like this

(We are assuming that we need to estimate profits to decide whether to enter the market here. The goal in
a market entry case should be made clear at the beginning of the case. You can refer the part on market
entry cases in section 3.1.1 for to know how exactly to do so.)
We can break the case into two parts:

1. Economic Sense: If it makes economic sense to enter the market.
This is typically done by Estimating Profits
Profits= (Market Size) X (Market Share) X (Profit per unit)-Fixed Costs
Here ask the relevant questions from the Customer bucket to estimate Market Size.
Then ask the relevant questions from the Competition and Product buckets to estimate Market share.
45
Finally inquire about the price, variable cost and fixed costs involved.
2. Implementation: If the market entry can actually be implemented

This is typically done by checking the feasibility of the value chain
Production->Distribution->Marketing
Here do a check if we have available resources-Capital, land, labor, equipment- to meet demand. Then see
what kind of distribution and marketing would be required to ensure products reach customers.
Here we also see if it makes sense to enter independently, through acquisitions or a joint venture to
maximize profits.
We will illustrate the two methods and the advantage of the Evolved approach over the Conventional one
through a sample Market Entry case.
46
4.2.2 Sample Case 2: Chicken Nutrients (Using conventional approach)

Your client ABC Co. is a vertically integrated manufacturer, marketer and retailer of vitamins for chicken
in the US. Now to pursue growth overseas in emerging markets, the management of ABC is thinking of
entering the rapidly growing Chinese market. You have been hired as a consultant to evaluate the
feasibility of their market expansion plan. Should the client ABC enter the chicken market in China or
not? Why?
What metric should we use to decide whether we should enter the market or not? Else I would look at
potential revenues, profit margins and investment costs.
The second part of the question is useful when the client themselves do not have metrics in mind to
determine market entry.
The management wants you to estimate potential profits and would take a call there-after.
Is there any particular reason why the client has chosen the Chinese market for pursuing expansion?
The Chinese market is twice the size of the American market in terms of units of product.
We are vertically integrated along the value chain in the US. Do we expect the same in China as well?
Not necessarily, we will definitely be manufacturing the vitamin though.
How is our product, the chicken vitamins useful to our customers?
The vitamin products produced by the client help increase the size of chicken breast and reduce fat
content.
What geography within China are we looking at for expansion?
No geographic specification, wherever the business can be profitable.
Overall strategy
Now I would like to analyze 4 branches of the business
47
You can analyze the Product branch and Competition branch together as a Competitor
benchmarking branch to eliminate overlaps.
1. Customer
What are the different market segments? What is the size of each segment? What is the growth rate of
each segment?
Segment
Small farmers
Community farmers
Corporations
Size( of total Chinese

market)
80%
10%
10%
Growth rate (last 5

yrs.)
1%
15%
70%
What are community farms?

Usually small farmers are part of a community. They donate a few chickens to the community pool and
they are jointly taken care of through more advanced techniques. The income generated is then split
amongst the contributing farmers.
What are the segments at home in the American market where we currently operate? What is the growth
rate of each segment at home?
All customers in America are corporations. The growth rate is 3%.
How are the needs of each segment different?
Can you ask a more specific question please?
What are the distribution channels that each segment prefers?
What do you think?
Small farmers and community farms would purchase the vitamins from a local shop. Corporations may
buy it in bulk and can be directly supplied to?
Yes. Good.
What is the price-elasticity of each customer segment?
We expect small farmers to be more price-sensitive than corporations.
What is the customer concentration like?
Small farmers are fragmented and corporations are more consolidated. Community farms lie in between.
48
Okay, I think Ill move on to the next branch of my analysis. So far the Customer aspect of the business
seems favorable owing to the large market size, twice as much as the US market. Corporations segment
seems attractive because of high growth, our experience in dealing with them in the US and low pricesensitivity. Cannot choose a segment yet since Small Farmers are a huge chunk and Community farm
segment also has a significant size and growth.
(2&3) Competitor benchmarking

I would like to know what kind of competition exists in the Chinese market.
We have no direct competition
Do we have any indirect competition then in the form of substitutes?
Yes, there is a substitute product in the market.
How does it compare with our product on price and quality?
The substitute is cheaper at 47c/unit compared to 80c/unit for our product. However the substitute can
cause side-effects in the chicken and affect the health of the person consuming the meat.
I want to try and gauge how we will fare with respect to the substitute in each segment.
1. Small farmers-We know our product is more expensive but has better quality. How much do the
farmers care about quality?
Farmers care more about price rather than quality hence would prefer the substitute over our product.
It would seem that we are not suited for this segment unless we can reduce our price.
We cannot reduce our price.
2. Community farms-Would they prefer quality over price?

Yes community farms are looking to get a high yield from their chicken and want minimal side-effects in
their chicken hence would be willing to buy our product.
Can we market and distribute our product to them?
Since community farms are scattered across China, it will not be cost-effective to be able to reach out to
them.
49
Then it seems we are left only with Corporations.
3. Corporations-Would corporations benefit from our product and use them? We know that they do not
use the substitute because of its side-effects. Also, we have similar customers at home.
Yes, corporations will most likely be our customers.
Would we be able to distribute our product? Since corporations would in more concentrated pockets than
community and small farms, I expect distribution would be more economic.
Yes, good observation.
What kind of brand image do we have?

This would be a new concept for Chinese corporations and hence we will have to market the product to
them.
Yes we should do that. If there are American corporations which operate in China, we should first sell our
product to them since they will be aware of its benefits.
Good.
Are there any legal barriers to entry?
No, weve got regulatory approvals.
Till now it seems that the corporation segment looks most favorable since they require our product and we
have experience in reaching out to such customers. Small farmers prefer the substitute product and we
have difficulty in distributing to community farms.
We can now change gears and come to the Company branch.
4. Company
What is the core-competency of the company in the US market?
To manufacture a superior and effective product.
What would our cost structure look like?
Investment of $100,000 would be required for expansion.
50
Variable cost would be 40c/unit.

Based on this information I would like to calculate our profits.
Estimating profits
The corporation segment is most suitable for us. Do we know the absolute size of the segment?
We know the US market size is 10BN units.
That makes the Chinese corporation segment size to be 2BN units. Lets assume in the first year we can
capture a 30% market share?
Yeah fine.
That will give us 600MN units.
Profits=600MN units*(80c/unit-40c/unit)-$100,000
=~$240MN
Anything else you would like me to do?
No thanks, good.
Discussion
Although in this approach you arrive at the correct answer, the process can be made a lot more efficient.
Did you notice the problems highlighted earlier?
a. Not goal oriented- Instead of writing the profit formula upfront and proceeding with the analysis, the
candidate deep-dives into the Customer branch, without being seemingly clear why he/she is going down
that branch. As a result several questions were asked in the case which either did not help us in getting any
closer to the answer or were too vague. For example:
How are the needs of each segment different? This question is a bit vague. A better way is to understand
the various product parameters and then interact with the interviewer about which parameter matter more
for each segment.
What is the price-elasticity of each customer segment? This question is important only when we are trying
to determine a price of the product. If youre asking this to understand customers at a qualitative level,
that is fine.
51
What is the customer concentration like? Not necessary at all. Getting a qualitative high or low
response does not help is estimating profits.
A goal-oriented approach would look like this.
Our goal was to estimate profits.
Profits=Market size x Market Share x (Price per unit-Variable Cost per unit)-Investment.
Proceed by estimating the market size.
Here you only needed to ask what the market size is of each segment and respective growth rates and
move on.
Then proceed to gauge what market share the company can achieve in each segment. For this ask all the
relevant questions with respect to competitor benchmarking. Similarly move across rest of the profit
formula.
b. Overlapping questions-Here there was an attempt to reduce overlaps by analyzing Competitor and
Product branch together as Competitor benchmarking. Still the question on What is the core
competency of the company is redundant and could have been tackled in the benchmarking itself.
c. Not quantitative enough-In this example the candidate fairly asks for enough quantitative information.
Still a better job could be done while market share for small farmers was being analyzed. When the
interviewer tells the candidate that small farmers prefer using the substitute, the candidate should have
quantified the information by asking what % of small farmers use the substitute product. Notice the
benefit of doing this in the Evolved approach, youre able to uncover more insights.
d. Forgetting the Value Chain-In the above approach, the candidate missed out on verifying if the client
has the capacity to produce 600MN units in a year, and whether they have the $100,000 of investment
required. Though this can be something which can be added as one more check-list question, its easier to
remember this separately as a second piece of analysis that could be done, i.e., Establishing the Value
Chain.
We will now see the Evolved approach to see how these issues get resolved.
52
4.2.3 Sample Case 2: Chicken Nutrients (Using evolved approach)

Your client ABC Co. is a vertically integrated manufacturer, marketer and retailer of vitamins for chicken
in the US. Now to pursue growth overseas in emerging markets, the management of ABC is thinking of
entering the rapidly growing Chinese market. You have been hired as a consultant to evaluate the
feasibility of their market expansion plan. Should the client ABC enter the chicken market in China or
not? Why?
(Same as in the conventional case)
Overall Strategy
We can proceed by doing two pieces of analysis
1. Estimate profits = Market Size*Market Share*(Price/unit Var. Cost/unit) Fixed Costs
2. Establishing Value Chain: Production --> Distribution --> Marketing
Market size
We know the market size is twice as large as the US market. Do we have a number as to how large the US
market is?
Take the US market size to be X units.
53
Do we have any segmentation of customers in China? What is the size of each segment and their growth
rate?
Segment
Small farmers
Community farmers
Corporations
Size( of total Chinese

market)
80%
10%
10%
Growth rate (last 5

yrs.)
1%
15%
70%
I would like to compare this information to the US. What are the segments and their growth rate at home?
The market for Chicken vitamins comprises only of corporations and has a growth rate of about 3%.
Based on this information, the Small farmer segment is the largest=1.6X with stagnant growth.
'Corporations' is the smaller segment with 0.2X size but significantly higher growth. Community farms
have the same size as the corporations segment but with a lower growth rate. Since in our home market we
serve corporations, it may be easier to enter this segment, however we cannot decide which segment to
enter or not enter yet.
Market Share
I would like to know what kind of competition we have in the current Chinese market.
There is no competition currently.
Are there any substitutes for our product currently?
There is a substitute product.
How does it compare to the clients product?
It is cheaper and costs 47c/unit, our product price would be 80c/unit. However it creates side-effects in
the chicken.
Do we currently know which of the three segments uses the substitute product?
Small farmers and some community farmers use it, corporations shun it since they cannot risk the health
and quality of chicken.
I would now like to see what kind of market share we can get in each of the three segments. Since small
farmers make the largest segment, I would like to begin by that.
54
1. Small farmers-We know that currently they are using substitutes. Do we know what % of small farmers
are using the substitutes? I want to know if there is even a market for Chicken vitamins.
About 20% of them?
Do we know why only 20% are using the substitute? Is it because of the side-effects?
Actually small farmers do not really care about the side-effects in the chicken. They are often reluctant to
make the investment required to buy the vitamin due to lack of awareness and limited capital.
Hmm and we know that our product is more expensive than the substitute. If we were to calculate the
return on investment for a typical farmer would it be positive after he uses our product. This calculation
would involve the investment to buy our product and the incremental price at which he can sell the
chicken since its got a bigger size.
Great question. The farmer would at best break-even.
Hmm so even if we were able to overlook the problem of low capital and lack of awareness of farmer, our
product would not be useful to the small farmers.
Notice above how many more insights are uncovered compared to the previous approach at this
same point in the case. This was possible due to a deliberate attempt at being quantitative about the
market share that can be captured by the client in the small farmers segment, instead of just
qualitatively knowing whether the segment is ideal or not.
2. Community farmers-We now need to see if our product would be useful to community farmers. Firstly,
I want to know what community farms are.
Usually small farmers are part of a community. They donate a few chickens to the community pool and
they are jointly taken care of through more advanced techniques. The income generated is then split
amongst the contributing farmers.
So since they use advance techniques, they would be more open to the idea of safer and better vitamins for
the chicken? Even capital for investment would be less of a concern for them?
Yes, good observation.
Would the return on investment be positive for the community farms?
Yes, because they have more #chicken compared to a small farmer, economies of scale kick in. They are
also able to sell the higher quality chicken at better prices compared to small farmers.
So we know that our product would be useful for the farmers, but do we have the right distribution
channels to cater to the community farms?
55
In fact we do not have a distribution network to cater to community farms. Since they are scattered all
across china we think it will be prohibitively expensive to distribute to them, either on our own or through
third parties.
Hmm... So that makes it difficult to enter community farms as a segment as well.
3. Corporations-I would imagine that corporations would benefit from economies of scale and can also
command a higher chicken price due to the nature of their customers.
Yes, big corporations sell to branded restaurant chains or packaged meat in supermarkets. They can
command a higher price after using the vitamins.
Would distribution be a challenge? I think it would be easier to reach to big corporations and well require
only a few distribution centers to reach out to them. Since in the US we have similar type of customers,
we even have experience in reaching out to this segment.
Precisely, we can economically reach out to this segment.
Are there any regulatory barriers to entry? Is there competition likely to be present in the near future
which we should be concerned about?
Weve got the approval to sell our product in China. There is no competition in the next 1-2 years.
So we know the market size of corporations is 0.2X.
Can we assume we should be able to capture about 30% of the market in the first year, and increasingly
there-after?
Yes, go with that.
Then in the first year we can sell 0.06X units at a price of 80c/unit.
Cost
We now need to see what kind of cost we will incur to achieve this target?
We will need to incur an investment of $100,000. Our variable cost, including all transportation costs,
comes out to be 40c/unit.
Based on this information our profits for the first year would be,
Profit =0.06X*(80c-40c)-$100,000=0.06X*40c-$100,000
56
Take X to be 10BN units and calculate.

Profit=~$240mn in the first year and are likely to grow at >80% year-on-year(y-o-y) owing to increasing
capture of the market share and intrinsic growth rate of the segment itself.
Good.
I would now like to come to the second part of the analysis.
2. Establishing the value chain

A) Production challenges-In the first year we expect to sell 600mn units and more in the future, do we
have the capacity to produce so many units? We also require a capital investment of $100,000 which
seems like a small amount in this context. I expect we would have that money to spare?
Yes we can meet the production requirements and have the required capital for investment.
B) Distribution challenges-We have already covered this aspect. We know that we can reach out well to
our corporate customers.
C) Marketing challenges-Since we are new to the market we will have to communicate to the
corporations our brand and product benefits. I would like to see first what kind of marketing strategies
we can transplant from our American business and build on them. Do we have any information on
that?
That would not be necessary. This much would do, thanks.
Although not shown in this case, the way a value-chain is set up affects profit margins. Parts of the
value chain such as some production phase or some distribution phase can be outsourced to a
partner instead of being undertaken independently by the client. This is dictated by which avenue is
more profitable.
Note - In the case we analyzed distribution challenges within Estimating profits although we had
highlighted it as a separate piece of analysis in the Establishing the value chain. In truth the two
branches are not mutually exclusive, they are dependent on each other. They have been explicitly
segregated so that you can easily remember to estimate profits as well ensure the value chain is
established. As you improve your case-interview skills you can merge the two branches.
We will be using the Evolved approach for Market Entry cases, but feel free to customize and bend
it according to your convenience.
Through Chapters 3 and 4, we have tried to show you skills needed to be developed to excel in case
interviews. We have covered the broad ones which apply to most cases. However, this is not an exhaustive
57
list, albeit an important one. In the upcoming cases you can expect to find more techniques and
approaches, some that are specific to certain situations and some that can be applied more generally in
cases.
58
Chapter 5: Cases
Guesstimates
Case 3: Guesstimate 1
Could you estimate for me, the number of burgers a McDonalds outlet sells in a day?
Can we assume this to be an average McDonalds as opposed to one in a specific location like an Airport?
Yes.
Do we include sales from takeaways as well?
Good question. It might be useful to include takeaways.
Do we assume that the outlet serves other items like wraps/puffs etc.? We will discount the people having
wraps/puffs instead of burgers.
Assume that burgers are the only item on the menu apart from fries and coke.
It is very useful to scope out the problem correctly. This has 2 advantages.
(1) You need to identify the constraints you are working under so as to analyze only what is
required by the client and move through the case interview faster.
(2) The interviewer notes that you have thought about various aspects of a case. Although he/she
might not ask you to delve into the nitty-gritties, he/she is assured that if youre hired and assigned
to a case, you will cover issues exhaustively.
Overall strategy
Here is what I want to do.
To simplify this problem, I would like to estimate the sales in (1) the restaurant and (2) takeaways,
separately.
59
(1) Restaurant
Strategy
I would like to approach this problem from a supply point of view. I want to add that supply in this
context means not the burgers that can be manufactured but the maximum customers that can be seated in
McDonalds on a given day. I will further try to understand their consumption patterns to arrive at total
burgers sold.
Im assuming that an average McDonalds has about 50 seats and is open from 10 am to 10pm. The
consumption patterns of burgers are different throughout the day
The total number of burgers = (# hours) x (# people per hour) x (# burgers per person)
We have used mathematics here to ensure MECE segmentation.
The total number of burgers = (# hours) x (# of seats occupied) x (# people per seat per hour) x (# burgers
per person)
The total number of burgers = (# hours) x (Total # of seats) x (average % occupancy) x (# people per seat
per hour) x (# burgers per person)
Lets say every person eats at McDonalds for 20 minutes. There are 3 (60min/20min) people occupying a
seat every hour. Also, in my experience since burgers in India are slightly smaller, I will assume 20% of
the people eat 2 burgers and 80% of eat 1 burger. That is an average of
0.2*2 + 0.8*1 = 1.2 burgers per person per sitting.
The total number of burgers = (# hours) x (50) x (average % occupancy) x (3) x (1.2)
= (# hours) x (% occupancy) x (180 or approx. 200)
Since the occupancy varies according to time of day, I would like to do the math separately for each hour.
Do you think that works?
Sure. That seems reasonable.
60
For simplicitys sake, lets take 3 scenarios: 100% occupancy (high traffic), 50% occupancy (medium
traffic), and 25% occupancy (low traffic).
High traffic: Lunch and dinner hours
Medium traffic: Post lunch and early evening hours
Low traffic: Morning hours
The kind of insight demonstrated by the candidate above is what you want to aim for in
guesstimates. Not only should it be important but something that can easily be incorporated in your
solution.
Here is a graph representing the traffic of people at McDonalds by the hour.
Calculation: (Following from the last mathematical equation)

High traffic: 5 hours * 100% occupancy * 200 burgers = 1000 burgers
Medium traffic: 5 hours * 50% occupancy * 200 burgers = 500 burgers
Low traffic: 2 hours * 25% occupancy * 200 burgers = 100 burgers
Total number of burgers sold in a day in a restaurant is 1600 (or ~1500 burgers).
61
(2) Takeaways
The takeaway counter has a queue during high traffic hours and it will be useful to bring in my own
experience at these counters to estimate the time that each exchange takes.
In my view,
Time taken for every person = 75 s = 1.25 min
# of burgers in an hour = (# of people in an hour) * (# burgers per person)
I have assumed that the takeaway orders are slightly more than the restaurant orders.
# of burgers in an hour = (60/1.25) * (2) = ~100 burgers
Assuming that the traffic of people is the similar for takeaways as well,
High traffic: 5 hours * 100% traffic * 70 burgers = 350 burgers

Medium traffic: 5 hours * 50% traffic * 70 burgers = 175 burgers
Low traffic: 2 hours * 25% traffic * 70 burgers = 35 burgers
Total number of burgers sold in a day in a restaurant is 560 (or ~600 burgers).
62
Hence, the total number of burgers sold every day at an average McDonalds is about 2200 burgers
Impressive. Is there anything else you would like to add?
Yes. I would like to do a quick sanity check.

Sanity check is a method to check if the answer from the guestimate is in the bounds of
reasonableness
Okay. How might you do that?
I think the bottleneck during high traffic hours is the supply i.e. the manufacturing rate of the burgers
themselves. The kitchen would be running at nearly full capacity during these hours.
Supply = Demand during peak hours.
Demand (as per our calculation)
Demand of burgers during high traffic time = 270 (restaurant: 200; takeaways: 70) burgers per hour = ~45 burgers per minute.
Supply
Keeping in mind that the McDonalds model is a made-to-assemble* one,
Time required to make a burger = (1) Sourcing components + (2) Heating + (3) Assembly + (4) Delivery
*A made-to-assemble model is one where the individual components are ready or made and
require only assembling to make the finished product
Time required to make a burger = 5s + *5s + 10s + 10s = ~30s
*Assuming 2 crate of patties (each having 30) take about 5 minutes to cook.
Hence, every kitchen employee makes 2 burgers per minute.

Assuming 3 people working in the kitchen during high traffic hours, the outlet produces ~6 burgers per
minute or which is in the same ballpark as the demand. I concede that due to incomplete knowledge about
63
the industry, I may have made some errors in assumption.

That is just fine. I like your approach.
64
Estimate the fleet size of Air India
Preliminary Questions
Do I need to calculate both international and domestic fleet size?
Count only the domestic one as of now.
Should I consider only active aircrafts or also ones under maintenance?
Only the active ones.
Overall Strategy
I would like to first estimate how many flight routes Air India operates in. Then we can see what would be
frequency of each route and accordingly find the no. of aircrafts required to service the route. Finally we
can sum up the required aircrafts for each route and get the result.
Sounds good, go ahead.
There are two types of cities
1. 6 Metros: Mumbai, Delhi, Kolkata, Chennai, Hyderabad, Bangalore
2. 30 Tier-two cities
This would lead to three types of direct routes

1. Metro to Metro: 15 routes
2. Metro to Tier two: Total of 6x5=30 routes.
We can assume that every metro has 5 tier-two orbital cities, for example there is no direct flight from
Mumbai-Chandigarh. It is routed via Delhi. Hence Chandigarh is an orbital city of Delhi. We will assume
there are direct flights only between a metro and its orbital tier-two cities, not between a metro and
different metros orbital tier-two city.
3. Tier-two to Tier-two (direct flights are rare, since they usually routed via Metros and hence
accommodated in previous two types of routes)
There may be some flights which have multiple stopovers. We can consider them to be equivalent to two
flights (if there is one stop over) under the types of routes mentioned above and continue with the analysis.
65
1. Estimating # flights it would take to cover a Metro-Metro route

Lets assume flights can run between 6am in the morning to 12am in the night.
If we take a high intensity metro route like Mumbai to Delhi, based on my experience, there is a flight of
Air India departing every hour.
If I assume that a flight leaves from Mumbai at 6am. It reaches Delhi at 8am. Then there is a 1 hour
turnaround time which includes maintenance of the aircraft. Then the flight leaves from Delhi at 9am.
Similarly after reaching Mumbai, the flight is ready to depart at 12pm (Noon).
At 6 am simultaneously a flight departs from Delhi, reaches Mumbai at 8am and after a 1 hr. turnaround
time departs from Mumbai at 9am.
This would mean that we need 3 flights departing from Mumbai at 6am, 7am & 8am and 3 flights
departing from Delhi at 6am, 7am & 8am to achieve a 1 hour flight frequency from 6am to 12pm
(Midnight). Therefore a route like Mumbai-Delhi requires 6 flights.
However all Metro to Metro routes are not this busy. Mumbai-Delhi is the busiest route. If we take
Kolkata to Hyderabad, it is a less busy route and the flight frequency would be more like 1 flight per 3
66
hours by Air India. This would mean a requirement of only 2 flights to cover the route.
On an average we can assume a requirement of 4 flights per metro route leading to an average frequency
of -a flight every 1.5 hours.
This would mean 4X15=60 aircrafts on Metro to Metro route.
2. Estimating # flights it would take to cover a Metro-Tier-two route

Coming to the 30 Metro -Tier-two routes. A typical route would be Delhi-Chandigarh.
These routes have low frequency.
The journey time is lesser of about an hour.
A flight departing at 6am from Delhi will reach Chandigarh at 7am, would depart from Chandigarh at
8am, would reach Delhi at 9am and would again leave from Delhi at 10am.
Hence with one flight we can achieve a flight frequency of 4 flights per day. Based on my experience
(You can ask the interviewer for his experience, makes the interview conversational) even 4 flights
might be too much and Air India may be having just 3 per day to save on operating expenses. Additionally
it's possible that one air-craft might be catering to two low frequency Metro--Tier 2 routes, however we
will neglect that and assume each route will have one dedicated aircraft at least. That leads to 30x1=30
Aircrafts.
Hence we have a total of 60+30=90 aircrafts of Air India meant for domestic routes in active service.
Alright, good job.
67
Estimate the number of schools in Mumbai
Are we counting both government and private schools?
Yes.
Are we looking at all standards from Junior Kg. to the 12th Std.? This would give us an age group of 4-18.
Yes, you are spot on.
Should we include junior colleges as well in schools?
No, do not include them.
Should we consider NGOs as well? What about local level teachers teaching without any school (for very
poor students)?
Consider only establishments where students go for an education. The establishment can be run by
anyone, government, NGO or private.
Overall Strategy
We have the following formula:
#Schools in Mumbai = (#School going children in Mumbai) / (Avg. # Students per school)
We will first estimate the (#School going children in Mumbai) and then the (Avg. # Students per school).
1. #School going children in Mumbai

We can divide the population across age-groups and then across income segment. We know that India
being a young country has 50% of its population below the age of 25. Since Mumbai has a population of
20MN, this would mean 10MN people are under the age 25. Assuming an equal distribution, this gives us
400,000 students across each year till the age 25.
Depending on their age and family income segment, different percentages of children would go to schools.
The following are general characteristics being applied on a group and there will be exceptions.
The middle class families send all their children to school. Some children may be home-schooled but we
can neglect that.
68
The lower middle class sends children to school up to 10th Std. But because of our patriarchal society,
some girls may not be sent to school. In the lower middle class segment several students only complete
their 10th Std. examinations and do not study further, though that trend is changing.
Most BPL families are too poor to send their children to school. These are usually, children of
construction workers, vegetable vendors or even beggars. However, there are several NGOs and
government schools accommodating them. These children have a slim chance of attempting their 10th Std.
exams and almost none at attempting the 12th Std. exams.
Note that the Upper Middle Class (10% of population) has the same relevant characteristic as the
Middle Class and hence it has been lumped in the Middle Class for analysis.
We can say that of the 0.4mn students of the age 17-18 almost 50% would be going to Junior Colleges and
the rest to CBSE, ICSE and other schools.
Hence we get the total school going children to be 2.4mn + 1.9mn + 0.4mn*50% = 4.5mn
2. Avg. # Students per school

We can divide schools as
Large Schools (30%)
Medium Schools (50%)
Small Schools (20%)
69
If I just count the schools around IIT Bombay, Powai (Mumbai), there would be about 10 schools of
which 3 are large, 5 are medium and about 2 are small.
You can take any area you want as a reference. Try to choose one which has a good mix and which
you think might be a close to an average
Large schools typically have 40 students in each class. They have 5 divisions per class. There are
variations but we can say generally they teach students from Jr. Kg to 12th grade. This would mean a total
of
40 x 5 x 14=2800 students.
Medium Schools do not tend to space out their students across divisions like the large schools do. They
typically have around 50 students in each division and about 3 divisions in total. These schools generally
teach students from Jr. Kg to 10th grade. This makes it a total of
50 x 3 x 12 = 1800 students.
Small Schools teach about 30 students at a time. They have fewer divisions, lets go with 2. They also
teach a small age group of students either only Jr & Sr. Kg, or 1st to 5th Std. Lets say they teach students
across 5 age-groups. This is an approximation as many times small schools like those run by NGOs lump
students across ages in the same class. We get total students as
30 x 2 x 5 = 300 students.
Hence an average school has
0.3 x 2800 + 0.5 x 1800 + 0.2 x 300 = ~ 1800 students.
Hence the Total # Schools = 4.5mn/1800 = ~2500 schools.
Sanity Check
As a sanity check we can see how many schools we get per square kilometer and if that number is
reasonable. We know that Mumbai has an area of 600 sq. km. I would expect about 2 schools per sq. km.
This takes the number of schools to around 1200. It seems like we made certain overestimations. Lets go
over the numbers once more.
Our average schools student strength looks all right at 1800, could not be higher.
Our Population distribution numbers seem right too.
70
Within the income-segments the middle class and BPL assumptions seem right. We may have overestimated the number of students from the LMC category. In the age-group of 4-16, 80% students may
have gone to school at some point of time, but not through all the grades in between.
Should I re-calculate based on this?
No that would not be required, good job with the case.
71
Estimate the market size for air-conditioners in Mumbai
There are two types of air-conditioners- window and split. Shall I include both?
Yes.
And should I include objects like air-coolers?
No, you need not.
In what unit would you want me to estimate the market size- #ACs, INR, etc.?
Good question. Estimate the market size in terms of tonnage. A 1 ton AC can typically cool a small room.
Should I include second hand ACs as well?
Interesting, but no. Include only first-hand ACs in the market size.
Air Conditioners are used for residential cooling and commercial cooling in Mumbai. Residential cooling
involves cooling in home and apartments. Commercial cooling would involve Office Spaces, Malls,
Restaurants, Hospitals, Schools, etc. Shall I calculate the market size including all these?
For simplicity, just calculate Residential and Office Space cooling. We can neglect the rest.
Overall Strategy
We need to calculate the market size for air-conditioners in tons. The market size would involve the #ACs
required to replace old ones along with the additional demand for new ACs.
Market size in tons= Demand to replace old ACs + Demand due to growth in market size
= (#ACs in tons) / (Avg. life of an AC) + (#ACs in tons) x (Growth rate)
Avg. Replacement Demand = Current # Products/ Avg. Life cycle of product
If the life cycle of a product is Y years on average, then in Y years time each of these products
would be replaced by newer ones. Then we can say, Average replacement demand for any
particular year is (Current # Products/Y).
We can take the average life of an AC to be 10 years. Can we take the growth rate in absence of any other
information as the growth in GDP of India which is about 5%?
72
Take the growth rate to be 10%.
Alright, what remains to be calculated is the (#ACs in tons) presently in Mumbai. We are looking at
demand in
Residential Segment
Office Space Segment
For the Residential segment,

#ACs in tons = (#Families who can afford ACs) x (Avg tons of ACs per family)
For the Office Space Segment,

Offices typically have centralized ACs and the tonnage of the Central AC decides how much area can be
cooled.
#ACs in tons = (Total office area) x (Tons required per unit area)
= (#People working in air-conditioned offices) x (Office area per person) x (Tons required per unit area)
Sounds good. Go ahead.
Residential segment
We can take the average family size to be 4 in Mumbai. Though there are families of bigger and smaller
sizes, we will use this simplification. Hence for a population of 20MN we get 5MN families.
The next aspect we need to look at is the affordability of an Air Conditioner. An AC costs roughly INR
25,000 to 40,000 depending on the tons.
A Middle Class (MC) family has an income in the range of 16,000 to 32,000 pm. The average household
income would around 20,000pm. Note that the average is skewed towards the lower limit. This would
probably be the salary of junior most clerks in offices. Given the AC cost is more than a months salary, I
do not think that the Middle Class would be able to afford ACs. Obviously the Below Poverty Line (BPL)
and Lower Middle Class (LMC) families would not be able to afford it as well.
73
Now we need to see the Upper Middle Class (UMC) families. Their income is greater than 32,000 pm.
The average income of this segment would be roughly 50,000 pm or about 6 lakhs per annum. The
average UMC family would live in a 2 BHK home. I think such a family would be able to afford at least a
1 ton AC.
In this segment there would be families which can even afford up to 3ACs, two 1 ton ACs for each
bedroom and a 2 ton AC for the living room. This is the case for my family, and our average household
income would be around 100,000pm. Based on this we can split the UMC into two segments.
Income between 32,000pm-100,000pm. Lets assume this will be 80% of the UMC segment. We will
assume on average a family in this segment owns a 1 ton AC.
Income greater than 100,000pm. Based on our assumption this will be 20% of the UMC segment. We
will assume the average family in this segment owns 4 tons of ACs
Hence we get,
#Tons in residential segment= 5MN x (10%) x (80%) x (1 ton) + 5MN x (10%) x (20%) x (4 tons)
=400,000 + 400,000
=800,000 tons.
Office Space Segment

For the Office Space Segment
#ACs in tons= (#People working in air-conditioned offices) x (Office area per person) x
74
(Tons required per unit area)

The people working in air-conditioned offices typically would have white collar jobs. Though there will
be cases where white collar professionals do not work under ACs and blue-collar workers have air
conditioning, we will neglect these exceptions. (White collar employees are those which typically work in
offices, they are accountants, bankers, bureaucrats, etc. Blue collar employees would be mechanics,
electricians, manual laborers, etc.)
The people with white collar jobs would be part of the Middle Class and Upper Middle Class in the age
group of 22-60. Assuming an equal spread of the population from 1-80 yrs., roughly 50% of the
population will lie in the 22-60 bracket.
We can assume that all men and half the women would be working.
This gives us a total of 2MN men + 1MN women = 3MN people.
In a typical office, people work in cubicles. Apart from the area of a cubicle, an air-conditioned office has
several common areas such as receptions, washrooms, lunch areas. If we were to divide the total area of an
office with the total number of employees, we can say that an office area roughly the same as a bedroom
would be equivalent to two employees. A bedroom typically has an area of 200 sq. ft. Hence each
employee is equivalent to 100 sq. ft. area in an office. Also we will require a 1 ton AC to cool a room of
200 sq. ft.
Hence,
75
#ACs in tons= (#People working in air-conditioned offices) x (Office area per person) x
(Tons required per unit area)
= (3MN) x (100 sq. ft.) x (1 ton / 200 sq. ft.)
= 1.5MN tons
Combining the office segment with residential segment, we get the total AC tons to be 2.3MN.
Market Size in tons = (#ACs in tons) / (Avg. life of an AC) + (#ACs in tons) x (Growth rate)
= (2.3MN tons) / (10 yrs.) + (2.3MN tons) x (10% per year)
= 460,000 tons / year
Great. We can close the case here.
76
Estimate the no. of taxis in Mumbai.
What kind of taxis, call cabs like Meru and OLA? Or the spot taxis like Black and Yellows?
Calculate the spot taxis, only, mainly the Black and Yellows.
There is an overlap of demand between call cabs and spot taxis. However, lets assume it is insignificant
since call cabs are used for longer distances like going to airport etc., and have a more premium income
segment.
Fair enough.
Overall Strategy
We can use a Demand based approach.
#Spot Taxis = (Total #Taxi fares per hour) / (Avg. fares per taxi in a hour)
The above analysis can be done for any hour in the day. However we should choose the hour on the basis
of ease of computation of (Total #Taxi fares) and (Avg. fares per taxi) in that hour.
For this let us choose the morning time, since we know most people need to leave home to go to work or
college at that time. This is better than choosing some other time like afternoon/evening where demand
can come for a wide variety of purposes (like going for shopping, theatre) and will make it difficult to
compute. We can compute the
(Total # Taxi fares) in the morning time (7am-12pm) and divide by number of morning hours to arrive at
(Total #Taxi fares per hour) in the morning.
We need to consider the following factors when calculating (Total # Taxi fares) in the morning
Population
Income Split
Age split
Gender
Alternatives: Buses, personal cars, bikes, walking, auto-rickshaws, other vehicles
Region: Auto-Rickshaws are not allowed in South Bombay, so use of taxis is greater there
No. of passengers in a taxi at a time
Journey time
77
Let us begin the estimation
Of this target population of 7.5mn, we can now find how many require transportation through autos or
taxis. Later we can compute, how many of them prefer taxis.
This step may be counter-intuitive. Try to directly go ahead with finding taxi demand instead of
(taxi + auto) demand. You would find (as we did) the need to do the income-split analysis, below,
separately for South Bombay and Rest of Mumbai. The approach given does the income-split
analysis together, and then applies a factor for market share of taxis within (taxis + autos). The
lesson here is that in the middle of a case you can pull back, tweak your approach for simplification
purpose, and then resume forward.
78
This gives us a total of 1.2mn+1.35mn+0.15mn=2.7mn people requiring (taxis + autos).
We need to now apply a factor, for people only using taxis out of these.
In South Bombay, autos are legally not allowed, so people there will only use taxis. South Bombay
roughly represents 20% of Mumbais population. In the rest of Mumbai, most people use auto-rickshaws
since their more easily available and cheaper. Lets say 20% of people outside South Bombay use taxis in
the morning.
Hence % of people using taxis in the morning=0.2*100%+0.8*20%=0.36
Hence the #people requiring taxis in the morning
= 2.7mn * 0.36
=~2.5mn * 0.4
=~1mn
Now, we need to apply a factor for carpooling. This differs by income-segment. In the middle-class
segment on an average two people would use a taxi at a time. Since this is the largest segment of demand,
we will consider the average carpooling number to be 2.
Hence we get a demand for 1mn/2=500,000 taxis during the morning.
Now, lets say the demand is scattered over morning 7am-12noon, with peak-hour being 9am-10am
constituting 30% of the demand.
Hence during the peak hour of 9am-10am, there is a requirement of
(500,000) x (30%)
=150,000 taxis per hour
An average fare time during the peak hour would be
=Time with passenger + Time without passenger
=40mins+5mins
=45mins
Avg. fares per taxi in a hour = 1 hour / (Average fare time)
= 60 mins / 45mins
79
= 1.33
Hence the total # taxis= (Total #Taxi fares per hour) / (Avg. fares per taxi in a hour)
=150,000 / 1.33
~110,000 taxis
Sanity-Check
As a sanity check lets see what the ratio of taxis and passenger cars is:
We know population of Mumbai is 20MN.
This will roughly equal to 5MN households.
We can assume that according to the income segment, the top 20% can afford cars.
This will give us about 1MN passenger cars.
The ratio of taxis to passenger cars would then be ~1:10 which seems to be in the right ball-park based on
experience.
Note the above computation of passenger cars is not how you would do it if you were asked an entire
guesstimate on it. However it is a useful quick and dirty method for the sanity check, here.
80
Profitability cases
Case 8: Logging Company
Our client is a South Indian Teak wood manufacturer. They have been reporting too high profits and want
you to figure out why is that so.
How high are our profits? What are we comparing it to?
Our profits are significantly higher than our competitors.
It is important to benchmark numbers with respect to something like competitors or timeline to put
the number in perspective.
Why is it even a concern?
The client is concerned if the high profits are sustainable.
Since when have we been having these high profits compared to competitors?
Since we started the business three years ago.
So it seems we have an internal advantage (company specific) ever since we started the business which we
are unaware of.
Some questions to understand the business better. What is the clients product? What are the competitors
products?
Both competitors and the client make wooden planks of two types - A and B. They differ in their
sturdiness.
What geography do we and our competitors operate in?
In the Nilgiri forests, the hub of teak wood in South India.
Most companies in this industry, the client included, own plots of land in the forest. Wooden planks are
manufactured from the teak trees that grow there. The planks are then sold in a common wholesale market
to customers (primarily construction companies).
Overall Strategy
First, I want to compare our profit structure with respect to competitors to identify key drivers of our
81
clients high profits. Following that, I want to verify whether they are sustainable.
Note: The above Information has to be given as and when the candidate asks for each data point.
The candidate has to come to his own conclusion of price from the margin data.
Based on the above information, there are two reasons why client is earning high profits
1. # of units sold by the client is 1.5 times more than that by the competitors
2. Clients split of production is 3:1 in favor of higher priced type B planks as compared to 1:9 for
competitors
We know what the reason for high profits is, but we need to know why this is happening and whether it is
sustainable.
Id like to begin by understanding why:
1. Units sold is 50 % higher than competitors
Lets understand the value chain of the business here.
Production > Distribution push of product > Customer demand
Hence, one or more of the following could be happening
82
We are producing more planks.
That is in fact happening. We are producing 1.5X compared to competitors.
Our wholesalers are able to push our products better than anyone else.
That is not particularly true.
The customers prefer our products better than our competitors.
No. The planks are a commoditized product. This means that customers do not prefer our type A over our
competitors type A. Same in case of type B.
Assume every plank that is produced in this industry gets sold. So, sales are dependent only on
production.
I want to segment further to identify the driver for higher planks produced by the client.
Cutting cycles is the number of times the trees in a plot are cut
Area of land is same since each company has been allocated a 50sqm area by the government for a 99yr
lease.
Why do we have more cutting cycles in a year? It is possible only if our trees are growing that much
faster. Is that the case?
Weve done some research and weve found that there are certain minerals in the soil of our plot of land
that allow trees to grow faster.
So we know why we are able to produce more planks. The big question is, can we continue doing that?
Are the minerals going to last forever?
The minerals are depleting and will get exhausted linearly in the next 5 yrs.
Hmm so the minerals are the key and they will deplete in 5 yrs. Is there any way to:
83
1. Re-generate the minerals, for example using special fertilizers? No

2. Get more of the soil with these minerals? No
3. Get a plot of land where these minerals are present? No
This means the profits are not sustainable. We will have to look at other ways to compensate for our
eventual depletion of luck. But before that I want to move onto mystery 2-
2. Split of unit production is 3:1 in favor of high-margin Type B planks as compared 1:9 for competitors
Why do we have a more favorable split of 3:1 for type B planks?
Every company tries to maximize the production of the high margin product. Our competitors are just not
able to produce as much.
Why is that? What determines whether a plank is a type A or a type B wood?
Every tree gives us wood of the two types. Whether a plank is type A or type B depends on the inherent
sturdiness of the wood, which is again because of the minerals in the soil. Naturally, our trees are able to
provide us with much more type B wood compared to our competitors.
So essentially minerals in the soil were the reason for our unsustainable high profits. Since we cannot
preserve our advantage of higher unit production and favorable split, we can potentially look to increase
our price in the market or reduce costs to maintain our high profits. Would you like me to do that analysis?
Prices cannot be increased due to competitive pressures and cost optimization will be difficult. I think
weve uncovered the crux of the issue. We can close the interview here.
Brownie points for mentioning that prices for Type-2 planks can be jacked up since no other
company has the soil advantage. Even if it means reduced annual profits in the short run, in the
long run we will have a higher cumulative profit.
84
Case 9: Drug mafia

Your client is a drug lord from Mexico whose company is reporting a drop in profits in the last 2 years.
He has hired you and you have no choice but to figure out why. How do you work it out?
Think of preliminary questions here
How does this business work? What part of the value chain does our client operate in?
We manufacture cocaine in large quantities in Mexico. It is then shipped to various countries. Here, the
local drug cartels purchase the cocaine from us and sell it to the end consumers.
What are our revenue streams? Which is the loss-making one?
We are only present in the cocaine business.
Hmm. Have our competitors seen similar losses?
We have men in a few other cartels who inform us that there is no serious hit to their profits.
Is this an issue in a particular geography?
The Asian countries have reported lower profits.
Overall Strategy:
I want to study the profit structure of the client and identify drivers of lower profit. We shall then address
them in the latter half of the case.
85
Since the # of units sold is less than what is produced, I want to understand where in the value chain is the
cocaine produced not getting pushed forward, and subsequently identify the driver for it.
Production Transportation to countries Distributor push (in each country) Local cartel demand
Since we are manufacturing the same number of units, production does not seem to be an issue. Are we
able to transport the required amount of cocaine to the Asian countries?
Yes. We are.
Are our distributors able to push the product to the cartels? Is there enough demand for cocaine?
No. They are not. This is despite there being a demand for cocaine by the local cartels.
So, either the cocaine is not being sold and is lying in the stock or the cocaine probably went missing in
transit while shipping.
The demand for the cocaine is the same. The cocaine is going missing while shipping it. Why do you think
that might be happening?
It is possible that our product is being stolen.
Good, but that is not the case. What is likely to happen to an illegal product like cocaine?
It could get confiscated by the police.
Exactly. It so happens that our cocaine is being confiscated in market places by the police. Why is this
happening?
This could be because either the enforcement against drugs has become stricter in Asia OR the security
around our sale with the cartel has slackened OR both.
In light of stricter enforcement, the local cartels have been receiving the drugs through alternate, less
risky routes and our competitors have moved to them.
Interesting, so it seems we have not adapted to this development. We can

a) Look to increase security of our consignments around this route
b) Shift to the alternate route or
c) Ramp up production to the extent that losses due to security lapses are made up for
d) Do nothing much if previous three actions will lead only to more losses.
Can we bring in our own security? Is it possible to pay off the cops to let go of our product? Can we pay
86
our distributor more to ensure better security?

We will be unable to do either of these.
Then it looks like we are going to have to settle with shifting our trade route as well (to get back the
business we have lost to our competitors). I want to understand how badly this affects our profits. It might
not make sense if we go into greater losses.
That makes sense. Shifting trade routes will increase our cost, but would be more than offset through the
restoration of our sales volume, leading to better profits.
Now we need to know which option between shifting routes and ramping production on existing route is
more cost effective.
That fine, we can close the case here.
87
Case 10: Mumbai Hotel

Our client owns a hotel. The client is pondering whether to increase the room rental rate from $160 to
$180 to increase profits and wants your recommendation on what to do?
Any particular reason why we have chosen price increasing strategy over other options to push profits?
Not really, were just exploring this option for now.
Sometimes, this question is useful to uncover what is the rationale of the client to prefer one option
over the other. You can use the information then as a focal point in your analysis.
Is $160 average room rates, or do we have standardized rooms with a uniform rate?
Uniform rate across all our rooms. They are similar.
What is the location of this hotel?
Located in a business area in Mumbai.
Overall strategy
I would like to begin by understanding the profit structure of the company and how room rentals fits into
it. I would then like to calculate the additional new revenue and costs to check if we are more profitable
than status quo. Costs will go up only if we find during the analysis that we need to make additional
expenditure to justify higher room rental.
88
Note: The candidate has to ask relevant question to be able to chalk out the profit structure himself.
It does not have to be directly given by the interviewer.
So we know were increasing Room rent from $160 to $180. To understand how this affects our overall
profits, I would like to understand how this decision will impact the following:
1. Occupancy rate: Customers might choose not to come to our hotel
2. Spending on Extras: Customers may scale back on this expenditure
3. Profits from Value-added services: This may be related to the #Customers coming to our hotel. This
analysis can be taken care of in the potential decrease in #Customers for point 1.
4. Costs of Room: Any additional expenditure required to justify higher room rate
This looks fine, you can proceed.
Ill begin by understanding 1 (Occupancy rate) & 2 (Spending on Extras), and later come to 4 (Costs).
We basically need to understand the price elasticity of our customers. I want to understand two aspects of
our business
(a) Type of customers-to find out how price elastic they are
89
(b) Competition nearby-this will affect customer price elasticity as well
(a) Type of customers-to find out how price elastic they are
What kind of customers do we get?
Mainly business and tourists.
What is the split amongst these two type of customers?
80% business and 20% tourists.
Since weve got 80% business customers, lets begin by seeing how increasing room rental affects them.
Business customers often don't pay from their own pocket but they can bill their company for the stay. Is
that true?
Yes, that is in fact the case for all our business customers.
Does the company also cover for the extras?
Yes.
Hmm, that means the cost is borne by the company. We really need to look if the company would be okay
with the added expense of the room.
So, the companies whose employees typically stay in our hotel have a cap for room rentals. Employees
can stay in any hotel as long as rooms cost <$220 per night. Also, there is no restriction on the
employees billing of extras.
Alright, this means that we can expect similar occupancy and spending on extras, since the employees are
unaffected and their spending is in line with company policies.
However, given that the cap is $220 and our objective is to maximize profits, we can potentially increase
room rentals even upwards of $180.
Good suggestion, we will look into that later.
As of now we dont see the need of increasing costs in our room. We can simply increase room rates and
expect more revenue.
(b) Competition nearby-this will affect customer price elasticity as well

However I would like to understand what kind of alternatives do our business customers have. Even
though they are personally not affected by the higher room rental, if they have cheaper options for the
90
same quality, they may take an economic decision from their companys point of view.
In the location that we cater to, there is one other hotel. It has rates around $160 per room. However we
have a better business center.
I want to get a sense if our customers are likely to stay with us because of our business center. Can you tell
me what the use of the business center is and how important is it for business customers?
Notice that the candidate is not only asking a specific question but also telling the interviewer why
he is asking this. This allows the candidate and the interviewer to be on the same page throughout
the case.
The business center provide facilities for holding corporate meetings. Our business customers frequently
use it and hence its quite important to them.
This means we have an edge over our competitor which will make our business customers stick with us
and anyways they are unaffected by us increasing room rates.
So from the point of view of our business customers, this looks like a profit boosting strategy and we
dont need to increase costs. However we also need to consider how it affects the other type of customers
Tourists.
I imagine that tourists would be a lot more price elastic than business customers since they pay from their
own pocket.
That is true.
In that case we have two options,
(a) Uniform price increase for business customers and tourists: In this case we will have to see if the
additional revenue from business customers outweighs potential decrease in revenue from tourist
customers.
(b) Price increase for only business customers: This can be done through a price differentiation strategy.
For example we can have executive suites for our business customers with slightly better
ambience/facilities and regular rooms for tourists.
Awesome, I think thats good.
*Synthesis*
91
Case 11: Fruit juice manufacturer

The client is a UK fruit juices manufacturer. The facility was established 4 years ago. The client sells to
big retailers as well as small and medium retailers. The client sells its product in two bottle sizes-1L and
250ml. The client has a 10% market share in the current market. The profits have been negative since
inception. You have been called to turnaround the profits.
We know the client is a UK based manufacturer. Is the geography of its current market also in the UK?
Yes.
Like I mentioned, we are manufacturers. We use third-party distributors to sell our product to small,
medium and big retailers.
This maybe a redundant question, but its better to be certain of your understanding.
What exactly is our product, like Tropicana?
Yes, you can assume Tropicana.
Are our competitors facing the problem of negative profits as well?
No all our competitors are profitable.
Hmm, so this seems to be a company specific problem.
Overall Strategy
I would like to understand the profit structure of our company. I would then like to compare it with our
competitors to see why we are making losses while the industry is profitable. Finally Ill see other ways of
increasing our profits.
The below profit structure is to be discovered by the candidate by asking multiple questions. Note
that it is important for the candidate to discover the ends of each branch in an issue tree because
they help diagnose the problem. Suggested way to go about:
Profits = (Rev) - (Cost)
= (Vol. * Price/unit) - (Vol. * VC/unit + FC)
= (Vol1L * Price/unit 1L + Vol250ml * Price/unit 250ml) - (Vol. * VC/unit + FC)
92
We can restructure the profit formula as

Profits= (Volume)
=
x (Profit margin per liter)
Fixed Cost
x (
FC
Based on the above information:

1. Litres sold (V) = (1*15 + 0.25*60 =) 30mn
2. Our Avg price per litre (P) = $13.2mn/30mn=44c
3. Our Fixed Costs (FC) = (12c) x (30mn) = $3.6mn
4. Our Variable Cost per litre (C) = 35c
I want to now compare our volume, Avg price, Fixed Costs and Variable Cost per litre with our
competitors to understand where we are lagging.
Notice the benefit of restructuring the profit formula as
93
Profits= (Volume) x (Price- Variable Cost/Litre)
Fixed Cost
Instead of using Fixed Cost/Litre. It makes more sense to segregate it out as Fixed Cost since now
we have all mathematically independent variables in the formula. If instead we wrote
Profit = (Volume) x (Price-Variable Cost/Litre-Fixed Cost/Litre)
It would be suboptimal since Fixed Cost/Litre is dependent on Volume and we cannot analyze them
independently.
We know that our competitors sell 1L and 250ml bottles at the same price as us. The ratio of sales in
terms of litres is also equal to 1:1 like us. Hence Avg price per litre is the same.
We know that even Fixed Costs (not fixed cost/litre) and Variable Cost/Litre is comparable with
competitors. However each of our competitors are selling 3X volume compared to us.
I would like to do the analysis in the following order
1. Increasing Volume
2. Increasing Avg Price/Litre
3. Reducing Fixed Costs
4. Reducing Variable Cost/Litre
Notice how comparing each metric with competitors, helped us to establish a priority in analysis of
each metric.
1. Increasing Volume
Can you give me an idea of our market share vis-a-vis competitors?
Sure.
Company
Market
Share
30%
30%
30%
Client
10%
Hmm...So it seems to be a volume issue for us. Our competitors are producing 90mn litres whereas we are
producing only 30mn.
94
Our break-even point would be

Profits= (Volume) x
(Price- Variable Cost/Unit) -
(44c-
( 9c )
35c
-
) -
Fixed Cost
$3.6mn
$3.6mn
Therefore V = 40mn litres.

Anything upwards of 40mn production and our company would be back to profitability. I would now like
to see if that is possible and why we have less market share compared to competitors.
We can solve the issue of increasing volume sales by upgrading the value chain through
Increasing production Better distribution and retail push Increasing Consumer demand
We can increase volume sales only if we can increase production assuming no inventory issue so lets
start here.
a) Increasing production - Can we increase our production? What is our current capacity utilization?
Current capacity utilization is 40%.
This means we can produce up to 30mn/0.4 = 75mn litres. Why is it that we are not producing more, is it
because of less demand for our product OR is it that demand exists but we arent supplying enough to
satisfy it?
We never thought of increasing production. We can easily sell 10mn litres more if we produce that much
more.
Great, this will allow us to break-even. However are market share will still be around 13-14%. We can
further see why our competitors have an edge over us.
It is important to ask the capacity utilization question. If we are operating at 100% capacity
utilization the volume cannot be increased without capacity addition which would increase fixed
costs.
b) Improving distribution and retail:

I want to know if we are doing particularly badly in any of these segments-small, medium or big retail.
95
What specific information you would require?

What is our split of volume across these three segments and what is it for competitors?
The splits are the same for client and competitors.
I want to know if our distributors and retailers are pushing competitors products more than us. This can
be either because of monetary reasons such as better margins being provided by competitors or nonmonetary reasons like our bottles having poor shelf life, etc.
No reason to believe that competitors favored because of a better push.
So we know that we don't have any competitive disadvantage with respect to our competitors, however we
can look to gain an edge over them. This can be done by
-expanding distribution network to new geographies
-increasing types of distribution channels in each geography-small, medium, big retail, online
-increasing the no. of shops we supply in each distribution channel
-improving effectiveness of each channel
The above is a good way to breakdown the distribution operations of a company. It is hard to miss
out on important issues if the analysis is well structured in a case.
Great, but we don't need to go in that detail, you can move onto the next issue.
c) Increasing consumer demand for our product.

Here we will have to benchmark our product on a range of parameters to understand why our competitors
have an edge in market share.
What customer segments do we cater vis-a-vis competitors?

Do we satisfy the requirements of each customer segment targeted?
How is the product priced compared to our competitor?
How is our product different from our competitors - taste, health, preservatives used, and flavors?
How is our packaging different from our competitors - bottle sizes, color, outer packaging?
How do our marketing efforts compare with competitors - product differentiation, marketing
channels, and brand recognition?
On all parameters we match competitors, except one. Over the last few years pulpy drinks especially for
orange juices has become a consumer fad both due to health and taste reasons. We have not tapped into
this market.
96
What is market share of pulpy juice drinks in the overall juices market?
About 30%.
Do we have the capability to manufacture and supply pulpy drinks? Would it require any additional cost
considerations?
Yes, we can manufacture and supply pulpy drinks at negligible cost increment.
(After checking with interviewer of what can be our approx. market share in pulpy segment?) So we can
capture 20% of the pulpy drinks segment.
When we saw we could increase production by 10mn litres and sell, which segment was that for-pulpy or
regular?
Yes, assume that those 10mn litre worth sales will come from regular juices only.
So increasing 10mn liters of regular juices allowed us to breakeven. Capturing 20% of the pulpy drinks
segment of 90mn litres (30% of 300mn litres) will lead to an additional sales of 18mn litres. Total
production is 30+10+18=58mn litres. This is still within our production limit of 75mn liters.
Is the price for pulpy drinks and the variable cost the same as regular juices?
Yes, assume that.
This will result in an effective profit of ((58mn litres * 9c) - $3.6 =) $1.62mn.
Great, would you like to analyze anything else?

We have seen how we can improve our market share in the existing market.
We can now see if we can increase volume by exploring new markets. We can then go back to seeing if
we can increase price, reduce variable cost per unit or reduce fixed costs.
That wont be necessary in this interview. Thanks.
97
Case 12: Vodka manufacturer

Your client is a spirits company which makes vodka. Of late, they have experienced a decline in profits.
Why is this happening? What recommendations can you give to turn this around?
Is selling Vodka the only business of the spirits company?
Yes, it is the only business.
I see. So there could be more than one reason for this decline. Where does the client primarily operate?
The client operates in the metropolitan cities of India.
Where do we lie in the value chain? Do we manufacture it and sell it to distributors?
That is correct.
What exactly is the product?
It is simply a standard bottle of vodka.
Since when have we experiencing this decline in profits? How much is this drop?
There has been a constant decline for the past 10 years and a rather sharp one last year.
Which is the geography giving us trouble then?
All over India sales have uniformly declined.
Sure, how is the rest of the industry doing?
They are also facing reduced profits but their case is not as bad as that of our client.
Overall strategy
I would like to study the profit structure of our client in Mumbai to understand what is causing the
problem and then proceed to suggest recommendations.
98
Lets break this problem down into 2 parts:

(1)Why has the number of units sold decreased? How can we change that?
(2)Why has the distribution cost suddenly increased? How can we address that?
(1) Addressing decreasing sales:

I want to find out whether this has been happening across the industry? Have the sales of our competitors
decreased as well?
We do not have hard data but there is evidence that more of the competitors product is being sold.
Hmm. So, if the market size has not decreased, we have been losing market share to our competitors.
The market size has stayed more or less the same.
I would like to now analyze where in the value chain (from the production to the end consumer) the
problem lies:
Production Distribution and retail push Customer pull
Production:
Has our production capacity taken a hit because of which we are not able to produce as before?
No. Its not because we arent producing enough units that we arent selling as much.
99
Distribution push:
What distribution channels do we use? What about our competitors?
We sell our goods to retail stores and clubs all over Mumbai. So do our competitors.
How much do we earn from each of these channels? What about our competitors?
Hmm. We earn 90% from retail stores and 10% through clubs. Competitors earn 60% from retail stores
and 40% through clubs.
Why is there a discrepancy between us and competitors?
The orders for vodka by clubs from us has been on the decline. The retail sales have stayed more or less
the same. Our competitors have not lost sales in clubs. It has increased in fact.
Hmm. That explains where we are losing our market share. Are the club-owners pushing the competitors
products more aggressively? Is there any incentive for them too?
Not really. It is the end customers who are not buying the vodka, resulting in lesser orders off late.
I would now like to understand the customer pull for our product which has been decreasing over the
years.
Customer pull:
Lets look at factors that influence a consumer to buy our competitor product over ours. Is there a
difference in?
Price
Competitors product is cheaper than clients product.
Why have we priced our vodka more?
We have a better quality vodka.
Vodka - flavors, alcohol content etc.
Ours is the superior vodka.
Packaging - bottle size, shape, color
This is more or less the same.
100
Marketing
Competitors have been marketing on social media and have an annual electronic dance music (EDM)
festival in Bangalore in addition to the channels we use.
I see! It seems like our competitors have been doing a good job of attracting a younger crowd. The
younger generation is much more tech-savvy and catching on to EDM as opposed to the elders. Hence, by
associating their product with these channels, there seems to be evidence that our competitors vodka is
more popular than ours in clubs.
You are right. The customer base we served 10 years ago is not on social media. Moreover, with age, they
are probably drinking lesser.
Correct.
To close the discussion on decreasing revenue It looks like our client hasnt kept up with the current
trends of the youth. The competitors have positioned themselves as a vodka that celebrates the spirit of
youth. They have done so by setting a cheaper price, marketing it on social media and collaborating with
music festivals.
(2) Addressing increased distribution cost:

I want to find out whether this has happened across the industry. Has the distribution cost per unit
increased for our competitors too?
It has, actually.
How does the distribution work today?
There is a designated distributor who distributes these goods across the city. He has chosen to increase
the price.
When did this happen?

This happened last year.
That explains the sharp dip in profits last year.
True. What are you going to do about it?
We should try and do the following:
Negotiate a better deal with him
That does not seem likely.
101
Try to move to a new distributor

There are very few distributors around and hence we do not have any bargaining power.
Try distributing the product ourselves.
We could consider that. Lets close the case here. What are your thoughts on the next steps the client
should take?
To restore the revenues:

Market the current vodka as a gentlemans drink or a vintage drink. This could be our premium product.
We must look to increase the distribution channel to airport lounges, airplanes and other places where the
moneyed people frequent.
Sure.
Have a slightly cheaper vodka range which targets the youth. The packaging for this range should be
attractive and funky. In addition to marketing on social media, it could be co-branded with aspects
associated with the youth music festivals. Fashion shows, sports and the entertainment industry (movies
etc.) We could invest in a brand ambassador if the numbers make sense
Okay.
To decrease the distribution cost:
We set up a distribution faculty within our company which serves the purpose of the current distributor.
We would, however, need to look at the numbers to make sure this is profitable.
Besides that, we could explore alternative distribution channels as well. E.g.: Online, late-night delivery
vendors.
These ideas make sense.
That will be all. Thank you.
102
Case 13: Private Equity Firm

ABC partners, a Private Equity firm, has hired us. They have recently acquired a Retail Chain. Post the
acquisition, in the next year Revenue of the retail chain increased 2X. However, Profitability reduced
from 40% 35%. The client wants you figure out why this is so and suggest suitable remedies.
Have the profits reduced or profitability? Is profitability defined as profits as a % of revenue here?
Profitability has reduced. Your definition is correct.
The client expected the Profitability to remain the same?
Yes, almost the same. Did not expect a 5% decline.
2X seems seem a huge revenue increase in a span of a year. Do we know upfront why this has happened?
(Spidey sense info as explained in section 3.1.3)
Yes, after ABC acquisition, 10 new stores were opened in the last year taking the count to 40.
How many stores do we have and in what geography?
40 stores in Mumbai evenly spread out.
Where do we lie in the value chain? Just retail?
Yes, we receive products from independent distributors and retail them.
What are our product offerings in the stores?
You can imagine a Big Bazaar-apparel, groceries, furniture, electronics, etc.
A follow-up question here on whether any of the above segments - store, geography, product type faces the profitability issue might be useful. This is an advanced tactic, and here the line between
preliminary questions and problem structuring starts blurring. This should be used, only when in
the back of your mind you know what your hypothesis in the case would be (based on experience).
You can check if the problem is isolated in a particular segment immediately after you are made
aware that the segment exists. This saves time since you do not have to come back to the issue later.
You still have to state out loud the overall strategy to solve the case which is in your head.
If this is your first case involving profitability (as opposed to profit) you may not already have the
overall strategy in mind. In that case you should focus on framing the overall strategy and then you
can ask questions about which segment is facing the problem.
Is this an industry wide problem?
Other retail stores are not facing a reduced profitability.
103
Is the reduced profitability of 35% same across all 40 stores?

Yes.
Overall Strategy
I would like to understand what is driving lower profitability by studying its components. After acquiring
this information, I will proceed to identify remedies for these issues.
You need a customized framework to analyze profitability instead of profits. A MECE
mathematical segmentation is can be very useful to come up with one on your own. This can be done
whenever you have an unfamiliar composite metric or parameter. Try on your own before seeing
the solution.
Ci is the variable cost per unit of the ith item type

ni is the number of units of the ith item sold. (Every unique product will have an i and ni would
represent the number of units sold of that product.)
Pi is the price of the ith item
(Fixed Cost per unit sales = Total Fixed Cost / Total Sales)
We will now look at how each bucket is responsible for our reduced profitability.
1. Price of Products
2. Variable Cost of Products
104
3. Product mix
4. Fixed Cost per unit sales
Its important to layout your structure upfront as shown above for the interviewers benefit as it
shows a clear pathway for how the case will be solved.
1. Price of products
Have we decreased the price at which we sell our products?
No.
Can we increase the price of our products to boost profitability?
No, since the prices have to remain competitive.
2. Variable cost of products

What do our variable costs include?
It includes only our purchase costs from distributors. Apart from purchase costs the distributor bills us at
the end of the year for delivery. However, this is included in the fixed costs.
Alright, can we reduce the purchase costs for any of our products by leveraging the cumulative bargaining
power of 40 stores?
No, we cannot.
3. Product mix
I want to know if our product mix has changed such that a greater percentage of our revenue is coming
from lower margin products than before. If this is the case what are these lower margin products?
We have recently introduced electronic products in all 40 stores. Electronic products now contribute to
50% of our revenue and are lower margin products compared to our conventional products.
This also would be leading to the 2X increase in revenue apart from the increase in 10 stores?
Yes.
Has the 50% revenue contribution of electronics come in addition to existing revenue from conventional
105
production or at the expense of revenue from conventional products?

We have seen a decline in revenue from conventional products, owing to loss of shelf space to make way
for electronic products.
In that case, ABC can look at shifting the balance of shelf space in favor of conventional products as long
as their overall profits do not take a hit, to secure a higher profit margin.
Yes, good point.
However, it seems that some decline in profitability was inevitable. When ABC decided to introduce
electronic products which typically command a lower margin. Was it not expected?
We did expect it but not to the extent of the 5% decline.
4. Fixed Cost per unit sales (p.u.s.)
a) Rent Cost p.u.s.

I want to break Rent Cost p.u.s. sales as (Rent per sq. ft.) / (Sales per sq. ft.). How has each parameter
changed?
(Rent per sq. ft.) has remained constant. What do you think has happened to (sales per sq. ft.)?
Even though the interviewer can give you the information, these are times when the interviewer
wants to test your reasoning and logic, and so flips the question back.
Assuming equal floor space of each new & old store our total area would have increased by 33 %( 30->40
stores). Our revenue has increased by 100%. This would mean that (Sales per sq. ft.) has increased.
Yes, exactly.
Hence our Rent p.u.s has decreased and this factor would lead to an improvement of our profitability.
106
b) Maintenance Cost p.u.s

We have seen a reduction in Maintenance cost per unit sales for a similar reason as Rent Cost per unit
sales.
c) Employee Cost p.u.s

Employee cost per unit sales has increased
Why has this happened?
Employees have increased from about 10 per store to about 30 per store for new stores and old stores.
This is because electronic products require a greater sales effort. Employees costs cannot be reduced
without taking a hit on profitability as long as we continue to sell electronic products.
So this has led to a hit on our profitability but again on expected lines.
d) Delivery Cost p.u.s
Delivery cost p.u.s has increased.
How are we charged by the distributor?

Retailers are billed by their distributors on the basis of no. of trips the distributor trucks have to make.
I would like to break-up Delivery Cost p.u.s as follows and see which bucket has changed.
107
Cost per trip has remained same but value of products per trip has gone down.
This is because the larger electronic items such as refrigerators and television sets are being transported
in each truck and there is less space for more items.
Can we reduce Cost per trip?
Cost per trip cannot be reduced with the current set of trucks.
We should then find either another distributor or have an in-house distribution team which uses much
bigger trucks for electronics so that improved space utilization more than offsets higher per trip cost.
Great, we can end the case here.
Note the importance of using this customized profitability framework. If you would try and fit the
normal profit framework, under costs you would find that all costs-rent, maintenance, employee
and delivery are up and would not know where the problem lies.
Also here the metric <Fixed Cost per unit sales> is more appropriate than <Fixed Cost per unit>.
Since there are all sorts of units-furniture, electronics, etc.-being sold, there is no standard product
unit. The common denominator that applies to all products would be per unit worth of sales.)
108
Case 14: Electronics Manufacturer

Our client is a consumer good electronics manufacturer. Their revenues have declined by 20% over the
last year and they want you to figure out the cause and suggest suitable remedies.
What is the geography of the clients operations?
Urban India-tier1 and tier 2 cities- is mainly where demand for our product lie.
We manufacture and then sell through 3rd party distributor and retailers?
That is correct.
What are the products we sell?
We sell kitchen utility electronic products like microwave ovens, refrigerators, toasters, etc.
Since when have we been experiencing the revenue decline?
Since the past year.
How is the industry doing with respect to kitchen-utility products on the revenue front?
The kitchen-utility electronics industry has been showing a growth of 5%
Overall strategy
I would like to analyze the revenue structure of the company and find out what drivers are causing us to
lose revenues and then proceed to suggest remedies.
109
So we know our revenues are down by 20% because units sold in our main business of toasters is down by
22%.
I would like to now analyze where in the value chain the problem lies.
Production --> Distribution & Retail push --> Customer pull
Production:
Have we faced any production related issues which have reduced our capacity to produce?
Yes our factory had been shut down for 2 months for the once in 3 year maintenance, owing to which we
could only produce 78% of our usual capacity.
Okay that explains why our #units sold is down by 22%. Im wondering if we had been able to produce at
full capacity would we have seen #unit sales decline?
Good question. Lets say we conduct a market survey of our retailers and customers and we find that even
if we had faced no production issues we would still have seen a 10% unit sales decline.
Alright, then there are other reasons why we would see revenue decline apart from production.
Coming to Distribution and Retail push issues.

Can you tell me how our distribution works?
Weve got three channels
- Small Retail (40% of toasters revenue)
- Big Retail (40%)
- E-commerce (20%)
What is the split for competitors? Through which channel have we seen the #unit sales decline coming
from?
The split is same for competitors, we are seeing the decline in #unit sales in the same proportion as the
current split across three channels.
During the case you can score brownie points by throwing few insights along the way as long as
youre not deviating much from your primary objective. Here you can say that, since e-commerce
110
comprises 20% of revenue, and if it is the fastest growing segment then the company should
aggressively market through this channel to capture a leading market share.
Is there any reason to believe that our distributors or retailers are not pushing our product as much as they
are for competitors? Are our margins in line with competitors? Is there any non-monetary reason that
makes our product less lucrative to distribute?
No. Our margins are in fact slightly better.
Then we are left with Customer pull decreasing, as being the reason for the 10% decline in #unit sales
over and above our production issue.
I wish to now know how our competitors in the toaster business have fared in terms of #units sold. I had
earlier asked about kitchen-utility products. However our revenue decline is because of toasters, I now
want to ask the question from this point of view.
We have 4 competitors A, B, C and D in toasters business. Each of us had a 20% market share roughly at
the beginning of the year. A & B have shown an increase in market share whereas C & D along with us
have reported a reduction in market share.
Is it fair to say that the customers of C, D and us have shifted to A & B?
Yes.
So somewhere A & B have developed an edge over us.
To identify this edge, I would like to benchmark our product with respect to the competition. What are the
key parameters of comparison for the product?
Why dont you come up with them?
Price
Quality of product-Life, time to toast, electricity usage, safety, look
111
After sales servicing

Marketing-advertising, channels of sales
Good, here is some data.

Price
After sales service
Client
1.5X
Best
1X
Okay
1X
Okay
1.5X
Okay
1.5X
Okay
On all other parameters you can assume the client and competitors don't differ much.
Based on this information it seems, that customers are moving away from our clients product as well as B
& A due to the higher price. That would make sense since we are dealing with middle class urbanites who
typically are price sensitive. Good point.
Another insight that can be mentioned is that because of e-commerce, customers can quickly check
prices of all companies products online and purchase the cheapest product more easily, making the
industry more price-sensitive.
To validate if price is indeed the reason for this years revenue decline, I want to know if our competitors
have changed their price. Yes, A & B have reduced their price from 1.5X to 1X in the last year.
I want to now know why our competitors are able to charge a lesser price. How does pricing work in the
industry?
A standard 20% profit margin is imposed on the cost by each competitor and us.
This would mean that our unit cost is also 1.5X compared to A & B.
Yes.
Then we can reduce our price by either reducing profit margin or by reducing our cost.
We are unwilling to reduce profit margin, since its necessary to overcome our initial investment.
Alright I would then like to analyze our cost structure and compare it to A & B. Can you tell me how our
fixed and variable costs compare with competitors?
112
You do not need to compare fixed cost, since that is our initial investment which will be recovered once we
get sales back on track. You should compare variable cost with competitors.
The reason the interviewer says this is because companies apply a profit margin per unit over their
variable cost per unit. The profit margin per unit chosen is dependent on what the fixed costs of the
company are, and here the interviewer has said that profit margin cannot be changed. Hence we
only see how variable cost per unit can be reduced to reduce price.
Do we know why our hourly wages are higher?

Our client has recently outsourced labor to China as a result of which they have been able to cut down on
labor expenses.
Where is our factory located? Can we outsource outside India?
Maharashtra. No our company owner does not wish to ship jobs overseas.
In that case can we outsource within India to maybe a more rural part of the country where wages are
lower?
Yes, that can be done.
In addition we should try and lobby the government to impose tariffs on companies shifting labor outside
the country. We can also look at a Made in India, Swadeshi branding of the company to increase
customers buying our product.
Interesting! You can synthesize your findings and recommendations.
113
Case 15: Petrol Pump Owner

Your client is a petrol pump owner. He has recently seen losses in his businesses. What might be going
wrong? What are your recommendations?
Preliminary questions:
How many petrol pumps does the client own? How many of them have a problem? Where are they
located?
He owns 50 out of which one has a problem. It is located on a highway joining Delhi and Chandigarh.
Have all petrol pumps in the area reported reduced profits?
We dont have exact figures but on the whole, yes, all of them have.
Is this a recent issue or has it been happening over time?
We have seen this in the past few years.
What are the various products sold at this pump? Is a particular business not doing well?
ABC sells petrol and diesel. Both businesses have suffered.
Overall Strategy
Hmm, I would like to study the profit structure of the company and identify drivers which are causing
profits to plunge. I will further try to address issues which come out of this analysis and develop some
concrete recommendations at the end of it.
Problem structuring
114
Hmm. It appears as if the root of the problem lies in fewer transactions at our pump. I want to investigate
as to what might be going wrong.
# Transactions = (Vehicles in area OR passing through the area) x (% filling petrol) x (% Market share)
Since, it is an industry wide issue, I think the following could be happening:

1. People in the area/passing through the area have reduced.
2. % people filling petrol has seen a decline. People may have shifted to other forms of transport in the
same area. E.g.: People cycle/use hybrid cars instead of using motorized vehicles.
No two-wheelers allowed on the highway!
3. We could be losing our market share to other petrol pump players on the highway. However, since
everyone has reported losses, it is unlikely.
Your first hypothesis is correct. The traffic on the highway has reduced considerably.
I am trying to segment the population that may have reduced. Has there been a significant dip in a certain
kind of vehicle type or a customer type? Say (trucks/cars) OR (truckers/ businessmen/ families).
The trucks use diesel and the diesel business has stayed constant in the area. Cars typically use petrol and
the number of cars has reduced.
So,
115
1. The # of people in Delhi/ Chandigarh has reduced, which is unlikely in a short span of time.
2. There has been a dip in the need to travel between the two cities, again, unlikely to have changed
suddenly.
3. There are alternative routes being taken.
I am assuming air and road as the only 2 ways of travelling. Yes? Ok. Has there been a shift of passengers
from the highway to some other road or possibly an air route?
Good job. Indeed, there has been a shift of passengers to a new air route between the two cities. It
proposes to cut travel time by 6 hours. Also, a new freeway is going to start which is much shorter than
the current one.
Interesting. So the reduction of car traffic which has impacted our business is because of a shift in
customers to airways. This traffic on the highway is going to drop further because of the new shorter
freeway which might incentivize some of the remaining vehicles to shift as well. Shall we discuss the next
steps our client must take to tackle this?
That wont be necessary.
*Synthesizes*
116
Case 16: Delhi Darbar

Note-This case is slightly different. It is more driven by the interviewer.
The Delhi Government has organized the Delhi Grand Darbar. The facility basically contains a large tent.
Inside the tent there are 17 Zones each of which has a different theme, and each of which is sponsored
by a different company. Sponsors have full creative control over their exhibits.
The Dome is suffering from significant financial problems as well as a large amount of negative publicity.
It is now March 2014, and you have been appointed by the Delhi Government to come up with a solution
for how to turn this thing around. To make matters worse, the facility has a life of one year, and will be
closed in 10 months in case things dont improve. I want you to come up with the plan.
The objective is to bring back the Darbar to profitability and to turnaround the negative publicity, right?
Correct, but the Government is not looking to make profits out of this, it is looking to break even.
Since when has the Darbar been experiencing financial problems?
Last year, when it began operation.
Im not familiar with this business. Can you tell me what the business model is?
Sure. We rent out the zones to a sponsor which is basically a company. Sponsors attract crowds by
entertaining them and brand whatever products or services they provide. We also charge a ticket price to
visitors coming to the Tent.
Its fine to ask a question like this especially if the situation is alien to you. This question is
important not because you discover that even tickets are a source of revenue, you would discover
that anyways during the case. This question is important since we want to emphasize that its better
to clear out your understanding than have doubts remaining in your mind which might bug you
later during the case.
Where is this Darbar located?
In the heart of Delhi.
What are the exhibits about?
You can consider them to be like the exhibits of an amusement park. There are rides, games also 3D
movies at different exhibits meant for the purpose of entertainment of audience.
What part of managing the Dome are we responsible for and what part do the sponsors manage?
We manage all aspects of the Dome, right from ticket selling to maintenance. The sponsors are
responsible for getting their own equipment and managing their exhibits.
117
Overall Strategy
We need to address two issues although they affect each other
1. Reduce losses to break-even point by either increasing revenue or reducing costs.
2. Turnaround negative publicity
I would like to begin by understanding our Profit structure. What is our current profit/loss?
We are making a monthly loss of 20 lakhs. We have 90 lakhs in revenue and 110 lakhs in cost. Lets begin
by analyzing costs first.
Notice here that the interview is directing where to begin first instead of the candidate taking the
lead, this can happen often in cases, since the interviewer has a particular flow in mind for the case.
Okay so we would like to see where we can reduce Cost. Do we have the breakdown of our costs?
Here is 2 exhibits for you. What insights can you draw from it?
Exhibit 1
Cost structure (in Head
INR lakhs)
Office
Tent Maintenance
Service
Personnel
Marketing
Total
This Month
50
20
20
20
110
Last Month
60
20
25
25
130
118
Exhibit 2
Operating Data
Number of Maintenance Requests
This Month
Average queue times at exhibits(minutes)
Last Month
Peak Queue time
Off Peak Queue time
Zone 1
12
21
Zone 2
10
25
Zone 3
20
15
92
17
Zone 4
34
11
12
11
Zone 5
20
76
23
Zone 6
18
88
21
Zone 7
71
54
34
12
Zone 8
44
10
Zone 9
29
12
57
14
Zone 10
22
15
232
121
Zone 11
10
14
76
16
Zone 12
32
18
21
Zone 13
140
92
Zone 14
32
Zone 15
20
12
42
Zone 16
37
31
18
Zone 17
45
20
12
Observations:
1. So over the last month our costs have gone down from 130 lakhs to 110 lakhs, 10 lakh reduction
coming from Head Office costs and 5 lakhs each coming from Tent Maintenance and Service personnel
reductions.
2. Our Maintenance requests have increased over the past month.
119
3. Our peak queue times are significantly higher than non-peak times which might cause visitors
frustration. This along with poor maintenance might also be causing us the negative publicity.
Good observations. In fact, the negative publicity is arising due to poor maintenance and long queue
waiting times. Please suggest ways to reduce peak time queue and improve maintenance. Then we can
look into cost reductions.
Peak queue reduction at exhibit

Definition: It is the time taken by the person just joining a queue to enter the exhibit.
Peak queue time= #People in a queue at an exhibit*Speed of queue (Min per person)
a) We can try to shift the crowd at the Darbar to non-peak times by increasing price of Darbar tickets at
peak times and/or reducing non-peak time prices.
b) We can increase the #People not at exhibits. This can be done by establishing common places
(restaurants and side entertainment) where people can be instead.
c) We can look to increasing #Exhibits subject to availability of area
d) We can ask the sponsors to increase the size of the batch they take at a time and reduce the duration of
each demonstration.
To do away with the queues altogether, we can also introduce a token system, where a time is given to a
visitor and he/she has to come at that time to see the exhibit, else they are free to do something else.
However we will have to see if this is feasible.
If not, we can also look to reducing frustration of the crowd in queues by providing side entertainment magicians, clowns juggling, etc.
Terrific ideas. We can reduce queue times through a combination of these. How would you improve
maintenance?
Maintenance improvement
The maintenance problem has occurred over the last month and weve seen a spike in maintenance
requests. We know that we have cut down on Tent Maintenance and Service personnel during the same
time-frame. I am wondering if there is a link.
I want to know
120
1. If our maintenance requests are being addressed in appropriate time?

Most of these maintenance requests are repeat requests, owing to the previous request not being
addressed due to lack of manpower and equipment.
2. What exactly do Tent Maintenance and Service Personnel costs comprise?
Tent Maintenance comprises maintenance equipment costs and Service Personnel comprise of our labor
costs including maintenance staff.
Hmm. So it seems that to reduce costs we have compromised on maintenance. Since several requests are
repeated, it only means that trash, accidental damage or whatever maintenance is required, there is more
time being taken to clean up. This is also causing us bad publicity. The solution would be to revert back
on the reduction in maintenance costs both from equipment and staff point of view. If we were to look at
zones separately, we want the revenue from the zone to be greater than the costs to service it. The
problematic zones for us are in the bottom right of the graph, which require high maintenance but provide
less revenue. We can either charge these problematic zones higher rent or replace them altogether if they
do not allow us to break-even.
Yes good points. Lets say we incorporate your suggestions

and find that we will have to make an expenditure of 10
lakhs to improve maintenance, no other optimization is
possible. Revenues remain unchanged. You can look at
other cost reductions now.
Other Cost reductions

So our costs had gone down from 130 to 110 lacks we are still in losses. We know we need to make an
additional investment of 10 lakhs on maintenance. This will take our costs to 120 lakhs.
Can you tell me what our revenue last month and this month was? I want to get an idea of how much cost
cutting is required to break-even.
121
Last month revenue was 110 lakhs, this month it is 90 lakhs.

Since our cost will become 120 lakhs after solving the maintenance problem, to break-even we need to
make up for 30 lakhs.
I would like to look to breakdown Head Office and Marketing costs to see if we can reduce them.
Weve looked into it comprehensively already last month and there is no possibility of further cuts.
We had made suggestions to reduce queue times which may increase our costs further.
Assume it to be negligible.
This means we will have to break-even by achieving a revenue increase of 30 lakhs. Shall we look into
this?
Yes please.
Increasing Revenues
Begin by telling me what are the likely revenue streams?
We already spoke of
1. Tickets
2. Sponsor fees
In addition there would be
3. Food, Beverages, Merchandise
4. Parking tickets
Okay, good. Assume revenues predominantly come from Ticket sales. Here is the break-up, suggest how
we can improve our revenue.
Ticket price
Avg #Visitors/day
122
Revenue
This month
150
2000
90,00,000
Last month
150
2444
1,10,00,000
Compared to last month we have seen a revenue decline of 20 lakhs. I am guessing this is owing to the
bad publicity we have been receiving. Since when has the bad publicity begun?
Since the last month.
So we can gain back up to 20 lakhs worth of revenue just by turning around negative publicity. For that
we need to spend additionally on maintenance, reduce queue times and have a strong marketing campaign.
However 20 lakhs is an upper cap since some damage has already been done.
Great, we expect this to increase our revenues to 100-110 lakhs. What else can we do to increase revenues
further to break-even?
Revenues= (Ticket price) x (#Visitors per day) x (#Days)

= (Ticket price) x (#Visitors per hour) x (#hours open in a day) x (#Days)
We can look to increase the above parameters.
We dont want to increase ticket price, since this is a Government organized event. So lets focus on
increasing #Visitors. The dome is already open on all days. Also, police regulations do not allow us to
keep the Darbar open for any longer than the current hours.
So we only look to increase #Visitors per hour. For this I would like to break-down the issue as:
Increasing capacity improving distribution of tickets Increasing demand for tickets

Notice how this division is similar to other cases in the book where there is #unit sales decline. There
also we isolate the problem along the value chain as
Production Distribution & Retail Push Customer Pull
123
How many people can we accommodate at the Darbar?

Up to 3000/day.
That means we have an opportunity of generating upwards of 20 lakhs more of revenue by using existing
capacity. Hence capacity expansion is not needed.
Can we improve ticket distribution? What are our existing channels?

Here is some info
Internet sales
10%
Venue-based ticket counters
80%
Other non-venue based locations
10%
Total
100%
The bulk of our sales are coming from Venue based ticket counters. Im surprised that online sales only
account for only 10% though it is the channel through which we can reach out to all of Delhi. I would like
to know what kind of online channel we have for selling tickets.
We have a website where people can buy tickets.
I would want to know how user-friendly it is to book tickets through it.
Our website has received several complaints for transactions being halted midway.
Then we need to correct that. Also, we should look at tying up with aggregators such as
BookMyShow.com where people look to buy tickets for variety of entertainment events.
We should be able to increase sales of tickets by accommodating this.
Notice how the candidate has used his business judgment here to point out that Internet sales seem
to be too low, and suspects poor user-friendliness of the website, especially since this is a
Government run event. While its good to be MECE, when it comes to prioritizing issues, you
124
should try to use your business judgment as interviewers look at that to differentiate candidates.
What else would you like to do?

We can see how to boost sales through the other two channels by improving their effectiveness.
Thats fine, anything else?
Finally, I would like to see how we can increase the demand of people coming to the Darbar. We can look
to improve Customer Value & Experience in other ways. We can also look at ways to improve marketing.
For now this much is enough, thanks.
*Synthesis*
The question and data in this case has been used from a similar case from the London Business
School Casebook 2006
125
Case 17: Theatre House

A theatre house recently got on board a new manager. He has hired you to help him grow the profits of
the theatre.
What is the profit growth target-50% increase or 20X increase or something else? What is the time-period
in which this growth has to be achieved?
We are looking to have a strategy for the next 5 years to grow profits as much as possible.
The importance of this question is to understand how aggressively are we looking to expand, a 20X
growth strategy will have more radical steps like investing in constructing new theatres than what a
50% increase in revenue plan would have.
How has the profit trajectory been over the last few years?
It has remained more or less stagnant.
What kind of a theatre house is this? Where is it located? How many theatres do they have?
Its a theatre where plays are conducted. You can imagine Prithvi theatre in Mumbai. Its only one theatre
we are talking of.
Are we open to setting up more theatres, exploring options outside the city or are we to focus only on the
existing theatre?
We are looking to grow our profits at the existing theatre.
In open-ended growth strategy questions it is important to ask more number of clarifying questions
to understand constraints you are operating under.
What is our primary source of revenue? Im guessing its the ticket sales from the plays? Are we open to
change the purpose of the facility from plays to something different?
No. We want to continue to have the theatre.
Overall strategy
I would like to break profits in revenues-cost.
I would like to see first where we can increase revenues and later see where we reduce costs.
Sure, lets do that.
126
What are our current revenue streams?

Why dont you take a shot at it?
1. Ticket sales for plays
2. Food and beverages
3. Parking
Good.
Lets see first if we can increase our revenue streams. We can in addition have
1. Book stores, video stores
2. Leasing theatre space for conferences, seminars
3. Acting school, workshops
4. Museum of drama and arts, archive of scripts
5. Merchandise sales
Good. Lets now see how we can increase our ticket revenues? What data do you need?
Ticket sales= (#Days) x (#Plays/Day) x (#Capacity per play) x (% Occupancy) x (Ticket price/seat)
I would like to see if we can increase any of these factors.
Okay, here is some data. Analyze and tell us how you can increase our ticket sales.
Observations:
1. Based on this information, it seems on Fri, Sat, Sun we have a 100% occupancy. We can look to
increase #Seats, our ticket price and #Shows/Day. However, we will have to look at price elasticity to
ensure #seats occupied does not reduce.
We can at max have three plays on any day. What kind of data would you look at to understand priceelasticity to see if we can increase price?
I would look at how much are we over-booked. This data can be collected by looking at how much in
advance we get sold out. How many more inquiries either at the theatre or online do we get after we are
127
sold out. We can also pilot by increasing price of one show on Fri, Sat, and Sun and see customer
response.
I would also look at what alternatives do people have in the vicinity with respect to direct
competitors(another theatre house) or indirect competitors(movie theatres, comedy shows) to understand
our price elasticity.
2. Compared to Fri, Sat, Sun on Mon, Wed, Thu we have only an 80% occupancy even though we have
tickets selling at half price. My preliminary thoughts are this is because of fewer patrons on working
days.
3. However it is perplexing to notice that on Tuesday, although we have reduced price to 90, occupancy
has fallen to 60%. Here I would want to know what is it that we do differently on Tue compared to
other weekdays.
Good observations. We have the best and most popular plays conducted on Fri + Weekends. Tue is a
holiday for the theatre industry. We use this as an opportunity to provide a platform for indie plays and
college dramatics clubs to showcase their talent. On Mon, Wed, Thurs we have plays of moderate
popularity performing.
Are we even making profits on Tue given the low price and occupancy? Do we wish to continue
encouraging young talent, even if it does not make sense from a cost angle it may make sense from a softpublicity angle?
We are able to break-even on Tue. Yes the management wishes to continue providing this kind of platform.
Alright, to make Tuesdays more profitable as well as better in promoting talent we can
-
Improve quality of the plays to boost audience turnout by appointing veteran directors as mentors
Tie-up with local schools by providing discounted tickets for class outings at the theatre
Sell broadcasting rights to TV channels. This will publicize artists as well as earn royalties which can be
used to improve quality of the plays. Even signing up with channels with mediocre TRP on non-prime
time slots is good enough.
These seem like ideas we can work with.
We now need to see how to improve our revenues on Mon, Wed & Thurs. This will happen if we can
improve occupancy. (We can increase price once we start getting full houses like on weekends). We can
compare weekdays to weekends and isolate differences leading to poorer collections for the former. Then
we can think of how to mitigate or compensate for these differences. So far the differences are
1. The most popular plays are performed on weekends
2. Weekdays and Weekends have a different target audience
Is there anything else I am missing?
This seems right.
128
Lets address the first issue first.

1. The most popular plays are performed on weekends
When we say we have popular plays on weekends and less popular plays on weekdays, on what basis is
this popularity determined...the respective turnouts on either days would not be a good parameter of
comparison, because weekdays are hamstrung with a lower audience?
Good question. The popularity of a play is determined through audience feedback.
So how is it that on Mon, Wed, Thurs we are consistently getting poorer feedback compared to Fri, Sat,
and Sun where we are consistently getting good feedback? How are the plays different?
Good question again. The biggest production houses have their plays on weekends. These plays have
larger budgets with more extravagant costumes, props and famous artists. Hence the likelihood of these
plays being more popular is greater. We have more mediocre studios performing on Mon, Wed, and
Thurs.
That explains a lot. What I now want to know is why do we not have the bigger studios performing on
weekdays as well?
There are limited number of big studio plays available on weekends and they prefer a nearby rival theatre
house.
Why is this so?
What do you think can be the reasons for this?
It could be because of a better:
-
Profit sharing with the play organizers

Brand of theatre house
Location of theatre, ambience of theatre
Facilities available-stage, lights, props
Our theatre is less reputed than our rival and hence less preferred.
To improve the brand image of our theatre we can
Attract quality plays be offering better price in the short-term

Invite reputed famous foreign plays to perform
Invite famous artists and celebrities to be guests and review plays to attract audience
Improve the ambience and theatre look to make it grander
Good idea. What else would you like to do next?
This addresses the issue of securing big budget plays on weekdays by working on our brand image.
However, this alone may not be enough to match weekend collections or even come close to them.
129
Let us now address the second issue of the different target audience on weekdays and weekends.
On weekdays, it would be difficult to attract working adults at least for shows before 6pm. Instead we will
have to attract housewives, retirees, older school students and college students to increase occupancy. This
can be done by
Popularizing theatre as a form of entertainment for this group
Advertise and provide promotional tickets; flyers at homes, social media for students
Have television soap actors as cast members in the plays to attract housewives, retirees
Having plays with themes that appeal to these groups
Alternatively some shows can have plays targeted towards the masses, by having vernacular languages as
the medium. We can also tie up with companies to have organizational outings on weekdays.
Till now we have considered revenues, but since our eventual goal is to grow profits we will have to see
the cost aspect of the business too.
I think we can stop here for now. Youve done well.
130
Case 18: Thailand Hotel Chain

Note: In this case at times, we have bundled questions to avoid unnecessary dialogue. Its fine if you
ask three bundled questions individually to the interviewer.
You are the CEO of a luxurious hotel resort chain in Thailand. The CEO is worried because the tourist
growth rate in Thailand was at 6% but revenue only grew by 4%. He wants you to find out the problem is.
Stop here and think of preliminary questions you would ask
So the client expected a revenue growth of 6% in line with tourist growth rate and wants us to figure out
why that is not the case?
Exactly.
I wanted to ask a few other clarifying questions. How many hotels are part of the chain? Are they evenly
spread out in Thailand?
20 hotels, evenly spread out across major tourist destinations.
Would tourist growth rate mean year-on-year growth in total no. of tourists in Thailand?
Yes.
It was useful to clarify here what is the meaning of tourist growth rate even if it seems obvious.
Tourist growth rate could have also meant growth in average no. of tourists per night which has a
completely different meaning. There are certain industry standard ways of reporting figures. You
want to check with the interviewer if your own understanding is aligned with his.
You said we are a luxurious hotel chain. Are there any other segments in the industry, what has their
revenue growth rate been like?
Often the devil is in the segmentation. The candidate is wisely asking for segmentation to see if
revenue across all segments has grown at the same rate or there is some disparity which might lead
to an insight.
For our purpose there are economy and luxurious segments and both have seen revenue growth rates of
4%.
So this is also an industry wide trend across all segments.
Its important to know whether a problem is company specific or an industry wide trend. This helps
streamline the problem isolation process to a great degree. E.g. so if all hotels in Thailand are
experiencing a revenue decline, the cause is more likely to be the decline in tourist traffic in
131
Thailand, an industry wide problem, rather than poor service in your clients hotel which is a
company specific issue
Since when have we been experiencing this problem?
Over the last 2-3 years.
Overall Strategy
Id like to see where the problem in revenue growth lies to so that it is not at par with Tourist growth rate.
Then we can figure out how to solve this.
Firstly, are all 20 hotels showing revenue growth of around 4%?
Yes all are showing the 4% growth figure and you can assume there are no differences in the hotels or the
tourist environment around them.
Okay, what are our revenue streams? What is the revenue split in each and growth rate of each?
Again notice the candidates emphasis on segmentation here. He is trying to see if the problem is
concentrated in a particular revenue stream or all across.
Our revenue comes 80% from room rentals and 20% from VAS. Both segments have seen revenue growth
of 4%.
Id like to proceed by investigating the mismatch between tourist growth rate and revenue growth starting
with room rentals first since it makes 80% revenue. Ill get back to VAS later.
Here the candidate is applying the 80/20 rule by drilling down the room-rental branch as opposed to
VAS.
Take a moment to think what will be the most logical way to break-down room rentals given the
original question of the interviewer
Since we are investigating the mismatch, Id like to break room-rental revenue into
No. of tourists at our hotels x Spend per tourist.
No. of tourists at our hotels has gone up by 6%. Spend per tourist has gone down by ~2%.
So its the small decline in Spend per tourist which has taken down the Revenue growth rate from 6% to
4%.
Alternate sub-optimal ways
132
Room rental revenue=Total no. of rooms available per night*(% avg. occupancy)*room rate per
night*365
Though this and other ways are formulaically correct, they do not help your investigation process
since your bigger GOAL is to find out the mismatch between tourist growth and revenue growth.
In this breakdown we would be told by interviewer that (% occupancy) has gone up by 4%, room
rate and no. of available rooms remaining the same. The next step here would be to understand the
mismatch between %occupancy growth of 4% and tourist growth rate of 6%, and hence we haven't
moved any closer to the problem isolation. That is why every step in the case must be GOALORIENTED. And a LOGICAL segmentation is required as opposed to an arbitrary segmentation to
come closer to the goal.
Hmm, lets investigate the Spend per tourist.

Spend per tourist=Avg. Length of stay per customer x Rate per customer per night
Rate per customer per night has remained the same, average length of stay has decreased.
Thats very interesting. We know the industry is showing a revenue growth rate of 4%, do we know if the
avg. length of stay of customers has decreased? We dont need specific data of competitors, but there
might be a body like a tourism body which keeps industry data.
Notice the candidate is asking for information which is obtainable
Yes, we can check that. And in fact this is an industry wide trend that Avg. length of stay has decreased.
This is the kind of issue tree you would want to have on your sheet at this stage in the case.
We have exhausted the use of the profitability framework. It allows us to identify WHERE the
problem is. We then move to a customized framework to find out WHY there is a problem. Because
133
of the effective use of the profitability framework we are now asking the more specific question
Why has the length of stay reduced? This also helps our next line of questioning be very specific.
Okay Id like to move by understanding two areas of the business
Customers: What has changed in their behavior that makes the average length of stay shorter?
Product: Anything that has changed in the industrys offering that forces customers to shorten duration
of stay
Competition: We can de-prioritize this branch since everyone is facing the problem
Alright, why dont you analyze the customer branch first?
Id like to know if we have any customer segments.

Notice again the candidates emphasis on segmenting and dissecting. The devil is in the
segmentation.
Segmentation based on what?
The segmentation should be along a parameter that affects the length of stay of customers. Lets look at
the following segments
Business and Tourist customers
Family or Singles
Geography of customers
What about type of customers-business or tourists. I would believe tourists tend to stay longer than
business travelers who come in for only a few days.
You can assume them all to be tourists.
Family or singles? I would assume because a family has many more members, because of their collective
constraints-working parents, school for kids-they would stay shorter than singles who could be lone
rangers.
For every single customer, we have 9 customers who are part of a family.
Has there been a change in the split? Are both segments showing a reduction in length of stay?
Notice over-and-above asking for segmentation the candidate is also asking What has changed
within these segments, something we discussed in Chapter 3.3.1.
Just information of what the current split is, does not tell anything. It is the change in the split that
matters.
Both segments have grown at the same rate, they have also seen the same reduction in length of stay.
134
What about geography of where customers come from?

We have customers coming from North America-Europe and then from within Asia.
Do we have a split between NA, Europe and Asia? Has there been a reduction in length of stay of each
segment. Has there been a change in the split?
NA-Europe makes about 50% customers and Asia the rest. There has been no reduction in length of stay
of each segment. However, the no. of Asian customers has been increasing in the past 2-3 years.
Aha, thats interesting.
Fun fact: In consulting, this is referred to as the Aha moment!
What is the length of stay of each segment?
Asian tourists typically have a shorter stay than NA-European tourists.
And this is because of their generally lower affordability leading them to having smaller vacations?
Yes.
That settles it then. Though we are having a 6% growth rate in overall no. of tourists, the growth rate of
Asian customers who stay for shorter durations is more than Western tourists staying longer. This is
leading to revenue growth of only about 4%.
Yep. Thats it.
But, wait... There is the 20% revenue coming from VAS as well. Can we say VAS, which comprises of
Wi-Fi services, laundry, use of banquet halls is also related to length of stay of customers and hence seen a
4% growth rate.
Spot on.
135
Case 19: Book Retailer

Your client is a book retailer who has been working with a publisher for some years now. In the current
model, the retailer buys books from the publisher every month and sells them to customers. Any unsold
books are returned to the publisher (the retailer does not have to pay for them).
The client is considering changing this model to a new one. Under this model, he will have to buy a predecided number of books and would not be able to return the unsold books. Should he change the model?
If yes, how many books should the client purchase from the publisher for it to make economic sense for
him?
Why does the client want to shift to the new model? It does not allow him to return the unsold books? Is
he being compensated for this?
Good point. The client is going to be able to purchase the books at a lower cost as a result. Hence, there is
the incentive to make more profit.
What book is this? If the book is returned to the publisher after every month, the book must be a periodical
one - like a magazine. Is that correct?
True. Assume that the unsold books are useless since the book is a periodical one.
Hmm... Can I have details about the earlier model and the proposed one in terms of numerical data?
Old model:
Publisher produced 10000 books a month each costing him $5.
Purchasing price for the client (retailer) = $10 per book
Selling price to end customer = $12 per book
New model:
Publisher produces X (depending on clients order) books a month each costing him $5.
Purchasing price for the client (retailer) = $9 per book
Selling price to end customer = $12 per book
The demand for the books is 7500-10000 with an average of 8000 per month.
The terms of the deal should be such that the publisher on an average makes at least as much as he/she
used to in the old model else he will not agree to the new deal. Moreover, this figure should ensure that
our client (book retailer) is earning, on an average, more than before.
136
That is correct.
Do we necessarily need to always cater to the demand? Our profits could take a hit as a result of overpurchasing to always satisfy demand. However, if we do not cater to demand, we could stand to lose out
on our loyal customers who might start purchasing books from a competitor.
Good point. However, the loss due to over-purchasing is something that the client does not want. He has
other loyalty programs to ensure that he retains his customers.
Overall strategy
First, I want to compare the previous and new profits of the book publisher and the retailer (the client).
Making sure that the new profits are greater than the earlier ones, I will use the constraints to arrive at a
reasonable figure for the number of books to be purchased.
Calculations
Publisher profit comparison:
Publishers current monthly profit = Revenue Expenditure
= 8000*10 10000*5
= $ 30000
Publishers new monthly profit = Revenue Expenditure
= X*9 X*5
= $ 4X
Hence, for the publisher to have increased profits,
4X >= 30000
I.e., X>= 7500
So, as long as the client orders for more than 7500 books, he is okay.
Perfect. Can we look at the clients profit figures now?
Sure,
137
Retailer profit comparison:

Clients current monthly profit = Revenue Expenditure
= 8000*12 8000*10
= $ 16000
Let Y be the demand of books in a particular month,
Clients new monthly profit = Revenue Expenditure
Case I: Y>X (supply less than demand)
Monthly profit = X*12 X*9
= $ (3X)
OR
Case II: Y<X (demand less than supply)
Monthly profit = Y*12 X*9
= $ (12Y-9X)
Do we have details about how many books are sold each month in a 12 month cycle? We can optimize the
profits by changing the number of books ordered for each month.
We dont have that information. We only know that the demand for the books is in the range of 750010000 with an average of 8000 per month.
Can you come up with a number for the books to be ordered making necessary assumptions?
Using the previous information that X>=7500, we know that Case I (supply less than demand) is never
going to be a concern for our client because a profit of 3X (>=7500*3) is always going to be greater than
the previous profit of $16000. Hence, we must look at Case II (demand less than supply) to give us some
more insight into X.
So,
New profit = Y*12 X*9 ...Y<=X
We need to identify an X (books purchased) greater than or equal to 7500 for which the above equation is
maximized keeping in mind that it should be greater than $ 16000.
138
Now, to arrive at an accurate answer, we will need the distribution of the book demand but to get an
approximate figure for X, lets assume an average scenario where the demand is 8000 books...
For an average month, Y=8000.
Therefore, Clients new profit = 8000*12 X*9
Remember that to earn the revenue for 8000 books, the client will have to purchase at least 8000
books.
For maximum profit, X will have to be 8000.
Then,
Client profit = $24000
This is greater than 16000 (the earlier profit) and is, therefore, a favorable scenario for the client. This is
profitable for the publisher as well (Profit = 4*X = $32000)
Fair enough.
Before we wrap this up, I want to check what the worst case scenario for our client will be assuming he
orders 8000 books every month. The worst case scenario is when demand is lowest (Y=7500) i.e. the
client has grossly over purchased and some of the books he buys will not get sold.
In this case,
Clients new profit= 7500*$12 8000*$9
= $18000 ...which is greater than $16000, his earlier profit
Hence, even in the worst case scenario for the client (when the demand is at its lowest), purchasing 8000
books from the publisher under the new model is still better than what he typically gets on an average in
the old model ($ 16000).
The publisher, as said before, will be more than pleased with this deal since his/her profits will, on an
average, have surged to 8000*$4 = $32000 per month.
That is correct.
*Synthesizes*
139
Case 20: Petrol Supplier

Your client is an oil company, Mobil, which supplies petrol wholesale to ABC, a private company owning
petrol pumps in Mumbai. Mobils business at these pumps has been stagnating for many years now and
they want to increase profits. What do you think they should propose to ABC so that they are able to do
so?
The objective is to help Mobil make recommendations to ABC such that Mobil can increase their profits.
My guess is that these recommendations should not affect ABCs current profits, else ABC would be
unwilling to implement them. Is that correct?
Yes. That is a good observation.
How many petrol pumps are we talking here? Are a few specific pumps facing an issue or is it a problem
throughout?
ABC owns 100 petrol pumps today. The stagnation has been common to all pumps.
Has this been an industry wide trend or specific to Mobil?
We do not have data on other companies.
Overall Strategy
I want to study the profit structure of Mobil and identify avenues to increase profits. Subsequently, I want
to study the profit structure of ABC so I can check whether these avenues dont adversely impact ABCs
profits.
Profit structure for Mobil:
There are 4 ways of increasing profits for Mobil:
140
1. Increase selling price of petrol. Is it possible?

It is not a possibility. Mobil might stand to lose their supplier contract to a competitor.
Youre probably wondering why increasing the selling price is not a possibility. Following an
increased purchase price for petrol, ABC will need to make up for the lost profit by charging the
customers a higher price. If ABC could push an increased price to customers and make a higher
profit on it, it is likely they would have already done it. Hence, an increased purchase price is only
going to hurt them. This makes it difficult for Mobil to increase the selling price.
2. Reduce cost price of petrol. Is that a possibility?
No. We are the most efficient company in the manufacturing and distribution department.
3. Increase volume of petrol sold to each pump. However, volume bought by ABC is completely demand
driven. If we can propose a way to increase the demand for petrol somehow, it works for both parties.
Okay.
4. Supply to other petrol pumps. Can they do that? Can they build other petrol pumps?
Usually, contracts between petrol companies and pumps are long term ones so supplying to other pumps
any time soon is not an option unless we can offer a very low price.
There are no plans yet around building their own petrol pumps. We could look into that later since it has
nothing to do with ABC.
So option 3 (increase volume) is a possibility. I want to understand ABCs profit structure now to see if
volume sold to ABC can be increased without hurting their profits.
Here it is.
141
Observations:
1. The petrol pump business earns ABC more profits than the convenience store
2. The convenience store traffic depends directly on the petrol pump traffic (factor of 30%)
3. A convenience store transaction is more valuable to ABC ($3.3) than a petrol pump transaction ($2)
To increase the volume of petrol sold to ABC, there needs to be a demand for the petrol at the customer
end. I want to know why customers come to a particular petrol pump over another. The major drivers are:
(i) Location, (ii) Price, and (iii) Service
ABC petrol pumps are quite well-distributed in the Mumbai city. So we can overlook location. Their
prices are competitive. Their service is top notch as well.
Interesting. Since, the prices are competitive, I want to explore the possibility of ABC reducing the price
of petrol in the hope that their transactions will see an upsurge. However, we need to make sure that ABC
does not have lower profits as an outcome.
So how does demand for petrol vary with prices? What is the impact on the profits?
The demand certainly increases with a lower price. However the total petrol profits will show a marginal
dip.
Ouch. I believe we are at a dead end here. The only way to improve Mobils profits in the short term does
not align with a profitable outcome for ABC.
Are you sure? Have you considered all the profit parameters in ABCs profit structure?
No. We havent. We are yet to analyze the impact to profit of the convenience store. How do its profits
142
change with the reduced petrol prices?

The revenue depends directly on the number of people visiting the petrol pump.
Will the increased traffic in convenience store - and subsequent increase in the profits - compensate for the
marginal dip in petrol profits?
Thats right. The convenience store profits will offset the dip in the petrol profits.
Excellent! This means that we can get ABC to reduce petrol prices and still make a higher profit than they
used to earlier. I believe this solution works out perfectly for both parties. One concern though: Wont
competitors respond to a 10% cut in prices?
Mobil supplies petrol at the lowest price. Hence, it is unlikely that any other pump will be able to offer a
lower price to customers.
Excellent!
On the point of services: Can ABC include new services (car wash, air filling station)/ improve existing
ones to attract additional customers?
This exercise will require significant investment and is a risky proposition in the absence of hard data (of
a correlation between better services and customer traffic). So, lets not look into this.
On a side note, we could also recommend Mobil to participate in the next step of the value chain (since it
is reasonably profitable) i.e. to build their own pumps.
That can be a case in itself. Lets put that on hold for now and hear your synthesis of this case.
*Synthesizes*
143
Case 21: Canada Discount Retailer

Note this is an intensive case so it is expected to take a longer time than usual to solve it.
Our client is the #1 Canadian Discount Retailer named Canada-Mart. They have 500 stores spread across
Canada and are leaders both in their market share as well as profitability. The #2 discount retailer in
Canada has 300 stores and is named Maple-Mart.
US-Mart a US based Discount retailer having 4000 stores in the US is planning to acquire Maple-Mart.
You have been hired to figure out how the acquisition could be a potential threat to Canada-Mart.
Our objective is to understand how US-Marts acquisition poses a threat to Canada Marts profits, correct?
More specifically, how it threatens our Market Share and Profitability.
And market share would be in terms of (Client revenue)/ (Industry revenue)?
Yes, go with that.
And just to be clear, by profitability you mean our Profits as a % of Revenue?
Precisely.
I want to know if my understanding of a discount retailer is correct. These are basically big supermarkets
offering customers cheap prices on their products.
Yes, they provide everyday low prices on a variety of products.
And what kind of products are offered?
All consumer products groceries, electronics, apparel, health items, etc.
And, why is US-Mart entering Canada. Is it just business expansion for more profits?
Yes.
Though the answer may seem obvious to you for this question, its still worth checking your
understanding. This is because sometimes there are strategic or regulatory reasons behind a
companys behavior and not just profits. For example the reason why Wal-Mart tied up with Bharti
to enter Retail sector in India was because of a regulatory requirement that not more than 49%
ownership can be with the foreign player.
Overall strategy
144
We need to see how the acquisition of Maple-Mart affects our clients

A) Market share and
B) Profitability
If you are reasonably comfortable with the profitability formula there is no need to write it down,
you can directly break it into its component buckets and move on. The formula is just for the
readers understanding here.
1. Firstly we will see where our competitive edge lies (in market share and profitability) and see if this
edge will be eroded post acquisition of Maple Mart.
2. Secondly we will analyze if we have any other advantage or disadvantage compared to the new entity
that will be formed.
Essentially this case is about a competitor benchmark before and after acquisition. Here weve
assigned a priority to the metrics of comparison
1) Analyzing those metrics responsible for our current competitive edge
2) Studying other metrics
145
You can do the benchmarking without this prioritization and solve the case, however it might take
you longer. But it would be good to remember that often the drivers of our current competitive edge
would be important factors to consider.
A-1 (How our competitive edge is affected with respect to market share)
Can I get a sense of what our clients and Maple-Marts current market shares are?
Canada-Mart: 60%
Maple-Mart: 30%
This means we currently have twice the revenues than Maple-Mart. Lets see where does our edge lie and
how this would get affected.
#Stores
We have 500 stores which and Maple-Mart has 300. Since we have twice the sales of Maple, this means
our revenue per store is currently greater than Maple Mart. Before we come to revenue per store, do we
know if US-Mart plans on opening more stores?
Good question, they dont actually.
Then we will still have an edge because of our higher #Stores.
Revenue per store
We know it is currently higher than that of Maple-Mart. Since,
Revenue per store = (#Customer transactions per store) x (Spend per transaction)
I want to understand why customers favor our stores over Maple-Mart.
Lets see what the potential reasons could be

Make this comprehensive list on your paper
Customer characteristics
- Segments targeted-age group, gender
Product characteristics
146
- price of products available, discounts and schemes

- variety and brands of products available
In Store experience
-
Ambience, air conditioning

Convenient layout, ease of finding desired items
Time required to shop, crowd
parking space
trolleys
Store Location, Brand

Now select the key issues using your business judgment which you think are important. If the
interviewer asks for more issues other than the key ones you mention then you can fall back to your
list on the paper.
Since we are comparing supermarket stores, we should look at the following key issues
-
Brand of Stores
Location
Price and Variety of products
Shopping time
Good, so we know that
a) We have some high-quality product brands compared to Maple-Marts. How are we able to do so?
We have favorable supplier contracts because of our market share such that they serve to us only.
I am now wondering if we will be able to maintain this edge when US-Mart comes in. Will they somehow
be able to get our suppliers to serve them by either providing higher margins to them?
US-Mart has announced it plans to source all its products from its existing supplier in the US. That will
mean they will be able to put on shelves high-quality product brands to compete with us in that segment.
And from the customer point of view, within the high-quality segment do they care about the brand
whether it is American or Canadian?
No, they are price sensitive. Within a segment, they are typically brand agnostic.
147
So it seems we will lose our edge in the high-quality product segment when US-Mart enters. Just to get an
idea of how much it will impact our market share, do we know what % of revenue comes from the highquality product segment?
5%.
So this will relatively bring a small impact on our market share.
b) Our shopping time is lesser, hence customers prefer to come to our stores
Why is it that our shopping time is lesser?
Compared to the current Maple Mart which does not have any sales representatives we have few which
make it easier for customers to locate products they need.
Secondly we have a better (counter: customer) ratio leading to better billing time.
I now want to see if we might lose this edge when US-Mart comes in. How does their current shopping
time in the US compare to our current time.
Its lesser by 5 min., since they have even more sales reps as well as a better (counter: customer) ratio.
This seems like a challenge for us, we might lose significant market share if we do not take shave our
shopping time. Can we bear the cost of having more no. of sales rep and counter in our stores?
Actually, our stores run on a franchise-model where we lend our Canada-Mart brand to independent
supermarket managers. They bear the cost of administering the supermarket and share the revenue with
148
us in exchange for licensing our brand name. US-Mart has a conventional centrally controlled model. Our
managers hence would be reluctant to bear the cost of additional sales rep and counters.
In that case can we need to communicate to the managers that it is in the mutual interest of Canada-Mart
and themselves that the additional cost be incurred. Otherwise there will be a loss of revenue for both. The
terms of how each party bears the cost can be negotiated. Will it be possible to do so with all our 500
stores?
This can be worked out, however it will take at least a year to negotiate the terms with so many stores.
Do we have the capital to buy-out all the stores to move to a centralized model? However before moving
to that we will also have to see the advantages of the franchise model which we might lose.
No we dont have the capital for such a thing.
Hmm, so we will lose some market share since shopping time will go from being a competitive advantage
to a disadvantage. Our product margins will also reduce, leading to a reduction in profitability, owing to
the increased revenue sharing with the managers.
A-2 (Other advantage/disadvantage on the market share front post US-Mart acquisition)
I want to now see if there are any other advantages or disadvantages we will have compared to US-Mart
on these criteria:
Brand of Stores
Location
Price and Variety of products
Shopping time
a) We have a better brand recognition than US-Mart in Canada.

Does the brand of the supermarket matter to the customers?
Yes, they trust the products based on the supermarket brand.
Is it difficult to improve the brand image for US-Mart? Given they have deep pockets they can use the
money on improving their brand recognition in Canada.
Good point, our advantage will only be temporary.
b) US-Mart prices are 10% lesser than C-Mart prices.

This is in the existing US-Mart stores?
149
Yes.
I want to understand how this would translate to prices in their Maple-Mart acquired stores. Since they are
sourcing these 10% cheaper products from the US after incurring distribution expenses to get them to
Canada at what price will they be able to sell compared to us?
Prices will be almost the same then.
Hmm, then we wont lose out on the price front.
B-1 (How are competitive edge is affected with respect to profitability)

We already saw that some of our profitability is being shaved due to lower margins owing to increased
revenue sharing so as to not lose market share to competitor.
Currently why do we have an edge over Maple-Mart when it comes to profitability?

a) Better margins of products?
b) Product mix inclined towards higher margin products?
c) Lower Fixed costs per unit sales?
Our margins are better since our product mix is more inclined towards higher margin products since we
are exclusively present in the high-quality product segment currently and we earn higher margins on
those products.
We have already analyzed how we will lose market share in the high-quality products segment. This
means our profitability will also be affected.
B-2 (Other advantage/disadvantage on the profitability front post US-Mart acquisition)

I now want to know if there is any other advantage or disadvantage that US-Marts acquisition will lead to
with respect to profitability.
Thats all we can close the case. You did well.
150
Case 22: Fashion Magazine

Your client is a fashion magazine company which sells a monthly magazine in India. In the hope of
increasing ad revenues, the printing team of your company has proposed to start having targeted ads in
the magazine for their customer base. Should they go ahead with it?
Okay, so my objective would be to check whether the new ad structure yields more ad revenue than the
current one?
Yes.
1) Regarding the current ad revenue structure:
a) What is the current ad revenue structure?
We include full page ads in our magazine and get paid for it by the company whose ad it is. Today, we sell
1M copies. Each magazine has 100 ads. Each ad costs $50 per 1000 copies.
b) Do we assume that all magazines are exactly alike today? What I want to know is whether a company
paying for ad space pays to have their ads in all magazines?
Good question. Yes.
2) Regarding the new ad revenue structure:
a) What exactly do you mean by targeted ads?
We have data on our customers based on which we would send relevant ads to them.
b) Broadly, what are the categories based on which you want to target ads?
Good question. We have premium brand ads and non-premium brand ads today. The proposal talks about
sending
Premium brands ads upper class/ premium customers, and
Non-premium brand ads economy customers
So we have 2 types of magazines in the new structure. One that contains Premium ads and another that
contains Non Premium ads.
c) Do we know how many premium and economy customers we have?
How do you think you can capture this data?
Hmm. I think this data can be captured if we have some background information about the customer. This
151
typically happens in a subscription model online or otherwise - where we are supplied with the
customers address and profession. However, there are also a number of people who purchase these from
vendors on the street. I am not sure we will be able to make this distinction here. I believe the company
must have some record as such.
True. We do sell our magazines in 2 ways Home delivery to the subscribers (80% of population) and
selling on newsstands (20% of population). 75% of the subscribers are premium.
People buying magazines off newsstands typically flip through the magazine before buying them. They
could be either premium or economy customers. It makes sense to have both types of ads in them i.e.
according to our current structure.
Correct.
Overall strategy
I want to study both the revenue structures and check whether the new ad structure yields more ad revenue
than the current one.
For current ad revenue:
Current ad revenue (per issue) = 1,000,000 x 100 x $50/1000

= $ 5M
Why do have only 100 ads? Can we increase it?
We fear that too many ads might drive away customers. The management has decided to put a cap at 100
ads.
152
For new ad revenue:

Lets put down the data we have at this stage so we can figure what additional data we need.
I will need the following information to arrive at a number. In the subscription model,
For premium ad magazines:

How many premium brands do we tie up with, today? Can we get more on board?
75. No, we cannot get any more. All potential premium brands are already with us.
Now that we have 25 more pages for ads, can we have certain non-premium brands too? E.g.: Kelloggs
Cornflakes, a non-premium brand, still finds customers in the premium segment.
Sure, but the point of this exercise was to charge the premium brands a higher price. The non-premium
brands would never pay more than $50 since we cannot justify this increase to them.
Alright, can we convince them to have more ads to fill out the remaining 25 slots?
Sure, we can. However, these brands typically have a set budget for advertising and we need to make a
more convincing case for them to expand their budget. Assume a conservative 75 premium ads for now.
I want to now look at how a premium targeted ad should be priced.
Sure. How would you determine the price of an ad?
There are 4 ways to arrive at this.

1. Cost based pricing. However this is rarely used in the advertising industry. The cost attached to making
153
an advertisement is often negligible compared to its value to the advertiser.

Makes sense.
2. Price based on the value of ad to the advertiser i.e. the return they will get based on how many people
theyll be able to reach out.
Good idea. Can you elaborate?
Advertising in the clients magazine makes sense as long as advertiser can expect returns from it. I think it
is fair to assume that premium customers are the only target segment for premium brands. Okay?
Yes.
Then despite appearing in fewer subscription magazines (800K600K), the premium brands are still
reaching out to the same audience in the new model. Hence, they have no incentive to pay a dime more for
the same outreach.
True.
Lets look at the actual numbers around this. We shall be talking only about the subscription magazines
(800,000 in number) here since newsstand magazines (200,000 in number) remain unchanged.
In the previous model, Premium brands paid out $40,000 (800,000 * $50/1000) to reach out to 600,000
premium customers. They do not value reaching out to 200,000 economy customers.
In the new model, to reach out 600,000 customers the payout would be $600X (X being the price per 1000
copies - which we are trying to calculate)
The payout in both models should be the same for the same value of reaching out to 600,000 premium
customers.
Hence,
$40,000 = $ 600X.
X = ~ $67
Hence, the premium brands would be willing to pay a price of $67 /1000 copies in the new model for
subscription
Alright.
One might not be expected to do an analysis in this depth for all cases. However, you might just get
154
a curveball once in a while testing your understanding of how advertising works. The above analysis
should help you to think from an advertisers perspective.
3. Price based on a competitors pricing. I want to understand how our magazines are different from our
competitors. Also, what prices do they charge?
Okay. There are 2 other premium fashion magazines which charge premium brands $ 70/1000 copies.
They are about the same as our magazines.
Given that there is not much difference in the product, it seems like brands would be unlikely to pay more
than the price of $70.
4. Price such that the total ad revenue (price * #brands) is maximized.

We do not have price elasticity data available.
Although the value-based approach gave us a price of $67, since brands pay $70 for a spot in premium
magazines today anyway, $70 is the price we should demand for premium ads in our magazine.
That makes sense.
For non-premium ad magazines:

We inferred that we tie up with 25 non-premium brands today. Since we have 75 more pages, can we get
more on board?
Excellent question. We can get more, yes. How will you price these ads?
1. A cost based approach will not work.
2. Can we do some competitor benchmarking? No? However, we know that our earlier model charged $50
/1000 copies.
3. A value based approach will give us a price of $50 /1000 copies again since these brands are indifferent
to premium/non-premium customers i.e. a reduction in outreach means a proportional reduction in
revenue. Price stays constant.
4. Maximize revenue by optimizing price and number of brands.
Good point. Lets say we get a total of 50 brands on board paying $40 /1000 copies.
In reference to point 3 above: Although the price per copy remains constant, note that the total
outreach is still reducing. Sometimes, brand managers have a target of reaching out a certain
155
number of people. If their outreach gets slashed by a whopping margin, say 80%, they might just
pull out of the deal altogether. However, we have left out that analysis for the sake of simplicity.
Okay. I think we have all the data required to calculate the new ad revenue.
New ad revenue:
New ad revenue (per monthly issue) = 3,150,000 + 400,000 + 1000,000

= $ 4.55M
Looks like it does not make sense to change the current structure of ad structure from an ad revenue point
of view. I recommend against it.
156
Market Entry cases

Case 23: Home Security Equipment
Our client is a Telecom operator. They are looking to diversify their presence in India and wish to enter
the electronic home security market. They want you to estimate potential profits and want you to suggest
how to capture a significant market share.
What market share is significant enough for the company? In how much time they wish to achieve this
target?
About 5% in the first year.
So our objective is to estimate potential profits along with having a strategy to achieve a 5% market share
at least.
Correct.
What are the products were talking of in the home security business?
There is essentially one product. Its an alarm system which is installed in the home along with sensors.
Whenever someone is trying to burgle the house, the alarm goes off.
What part of the value chain are we looking to enter?
We have not decided but generally industry players manufacture and use third parties to distribute and
retail.
What geography are we looking to sell in?
Anywhere in India where there is a market.
Overall Strategy
We can begin by first estimating profits.
Profits = (Market Size) x (Market Share) x (Profit per unit) - (Investment)
While analyzing market share we can see how to ensure a minimum 5% share.
Dont worry about initial investment. Just calculate profits independent of initial investment for now.
157
1. Market size
(Weve assumed a 70-30 Rural-Urban divide. Avg family size is take as 5 and 4 respectively for Rural and
Urban families.)
Next we will have to see
a) How many families can afford to purchase the home safety units?
b) How many families would buy them given some of them live in high risk and low risk areas
A smaller % of rural families would be able to afford the equipment compared to urbanites. We will have
to also see how many families in each segment need the equipment depending on degree of criminal
activity and available security measures (police enforcement, building security, CCTVs)
Good lets say we do this analysis and find that the market size is 15mn household. Lets move on from
there.
2. Market share
Lets now look at how we can get a market share of at least 5%.
Just to put this number in perspective what is the market share of the largest player?
The industry is highly fragmented with mainly local players. The largest player has a market share of
about 5%.
I want to understand what drives local dominance?
Well, the industry is such that majority of costs are concentrated in transportation of the fragile
equipment. Lesser the distance from factory lower the cost. Since manufacturing is cheap and
transportation is not, factories are set up close to markets.
158
That was a good question to understand more about the industry.

And, what is the growth rate of the industry?
It is about 10%.
There are two ways to enter the market, displacing existing players or taking a slice of the growing
market. However, because of the fragmented nature of the industry, if we have to capture a significant
market share through either path, we will need to have a competitive edge in our product. I would like to
benchmark our product with competitors to see if we have an advantage. Id like to do it on basis of price
and other product parameters.
We dont have a product of our own. We plan to enter with the same type of products that already exist at
the same prices.
If our product is going to be the physically the same, then to capture a significant share in such a
fragmented industry, can we get an edge on
a) Production front leading to lowered cost and hence lower prices
We dont even have internal ability to produce this type of equipment
b) Distribution front leading to lower transportation cost and distributors favoring to push our products
over competitors
Lowering transportation cost has been looked into and is difficult. Also because the market is very
competitive we cannot afford to pay higher margins to distributors.
c) Marketing
Consumers are price sensitive, do not care much about product brand.
This means independently we cannot have a significant share. Then the only remaining options to capture
a 5% market share are through a Joint Venture or by Acquiring existing players.
Joint venture would make sense if there is some part of the value chain where we can complement existing
players, either in production, distribution or marketing/retailing so that together with our partner we have
an edge. However weve already seen that we cannot manufacture and cannot provide any edge on
distribution or marketing front.
Then it makes sense to acquire existing players. For that however we would need enough capital, do we
have that?
Yes, we do.
159
3. Profit per unit

I would like to know the price of existing products since that would be our price as well.
They are generally priced between Rs. 5,000-15,000. The margin earned is 10% of the revenue.
Apart from that there is a servicing package which is bundled. Usually Rs. 200 per month is charged, and
a margin of 25% is earned in servicing.
Why is there a range in price of the product? Is it due to difference in quality of product or brand?
No there is no difference in quality. Each product has a main alarm system along with sensors placed in
different parts of the rooms. The price increases as the no. of sensors required are more.
And I am guessing that the bigger a house more the sensors required and hence a higher price.
Yes.
Calculation
We can divide the 15mn households into
33% small houses requiring a unit priced at 5,000
33% medium houses requiring a unit priced at 10,000
33% large houses requiring a unit priced at 15,000
Okay. Lets go ahead with that assumption.
The average price is Rs. 10,000.
We know we earn a 10% margin which will result in a Rs. 1000 profit.
Apart from that we know that Rs. 200 per month is charged with a margin of 25%. What is the life of any
unit?
One year.
Then for every unit sold we earn 200x12 = Rs.2400.
At a 25% margin this means an additional Rs. 600 of profit.
Hence total profit on a product is 1000+600 = 1600.
Hence our expected profit = (Market size) x (Market share) x (Avg Profit per unit)
160
15mn
5%
Rs. 1600
= Rs. 120 crore

Alright, thanks.
161
Case 24: Washing Machine

The setting is that of 1990. Your client is an electronics manufacturer which wants to enter the Haryana
market. You need to tell them whether it is a good idea to do so.
Do you have a metric which we should use to decide whether to enter the market or not? Maybe we can
look at investment costs, profits and break-even point? Any other benchmarks we need to look at?
Lets estimate our profits for now and later we can benchmark this to Maharashtra, where we operate
today.
What kind of products does our client want to introduce? Is it generic electronic items or are there a few
important ones they want to focus on?
They want to introduce a specific product a semi-automatic washing machine into Haryana. This
involves the latest technology and is operated using buttons alone.
I am not aware of the 1990 context. Is this washing machine a new product in the market? What are the
other garment washing options?
There are a few manual washing machines present today. Ours is the only S/A washing machine. In fact it
has been patented.
Overall strategy
I want to break down this problem into 2 parts.
(1)Whether this makes sense from a profit point of view by calculating the market size, expected market
share and profit margin.
(2)Whether it is possible to establish the entire value chain so the client can sell the washing machines to
the end user.
Lets assume that the implementation bit can be taken care of. Lets begin with the market sizing.
OK. To calculate the market size, let us understand the product a little first. Is the machine like any other
washing machine we get today? How is it priced? I want to understand who will be able to afford it.
Yes, the machine is similar. It is in the same price range (Rs. 4000 - 5000) as most other machines
available in the market today. Assume it can be afforded by most families in the middle income group or
upwards.
162
Okay. That is helpful. Starting with Haryana population, Ill apply appropriate filters to finally get our
potential market size. I will be using Maharashtra as a reference for demographics since I am not familiar
with the Haryana demographics.
Alright, proceed.
The market for washing machines therefore is around 0.7M machines.

Fair enough. Move on.
Now, to calculate the market share, I want to know how the clients product compares to others available
in the market. What are the factors influencing a customers purchase of a washing machine? I can think
of the following:
1. Price
Upfront cost: The company wants to sell the machine at Rs. 4500. This is cheaper than any other washing
machine available.
Running cost: Rs. 500 /year (electricity). This machine is a higher power requirement than present
washing machines.
163
2. Time saved
3. Quality of wash
4. Ease of use
5. Durability
6. Size
All these are either up to the industry standard or are better.
Can we expect a 50% market share in this industry given that we score over our competitors in most
regard? It might be slightly lesser than that since there are other factors like product awareness and ability
to operate a new device.
Umm... Lets keep it at 10% after the first year since people already use washing machines today.
The market for our client, therefore, is 70,000 units after a 10% market share.
Can I have the fixed cost and profit per unit to calculate the total profit and time required to break even?
Assume no fixed cost. The manufacturing cost is Rs. 4000. The distribution cost is Rs. 650 per unit when
sold through retail outlets and Rs. 100 per unit when sold through the company outlets. Note, however,
that using all distribution channels available, 40% of sales come through retail outlets and the rest
through company stores.
Client
Internal
Cost
Distribution
cost
Total cost
Selling
price
Profit
Retail
(40%)
4000
650
4650
4500
(-)150
Own
(60%)
4000
100
4100
4500
400
I see that we will be profitable if we sell our product only through our own distribution channels. We will
suffer losses through the retail channel. Are the distribution costs negotiable?
No
Are there competitors who sell products through the retail stores at all? Do they make profit? Can we have
their profit structure?
Internal
Cost
Distribution
cost
164
Total cost
Selling
price
Profit
Competition
Retail
(40%)
4300
650
4950
5000
50
Own
(60%)
4300
100
4400
5000
600
Hmm. Although the competitors have a much higher internal cost, they make up for it by having a much
higher selling price. Can we increase our prices too?
No. The client wants to maintain the price advantage in the market.
Fair enough. Can we use any new channels of distribution?
No.
Alright. Since the client suffers losses by selling their washing machine through retail stores, it makes
sense to distribute them only through ones own stores.
Correct.
Given the strategy is to sell through company owned stores, we will not lose all of the 40% sales from
external retail stores. Given we have a superior product creating a customer pull, we might just get more
than 60% from company owned stores.
You make a fair point. However, lets assume that it is still only 60% and go ahead.
The operating profit then becomes,
Profit = Market size * Market share * Profit per unit
= 0.7 M * (60% of 10%) * 400
= Rs. 1.68 Cr.
Is this a sensible figure?
Considering any profit is good news for client, yes, this is a sensible figure. My recommendation will be
that the client enter Haryana. However, it will be interesting to know how we are doing in Maharashtra
comparatively.
Our profits in Maharashtra are Rs. 40 Cr (we sold 10L washing machines last year). Can you give me
possible reasons for the huge discrepancy in profit figures?
Since the profit figures have changes with geography, I want to understand what relevant factors are
different between Haryana and Maharashtra:
165
Profit = Market size * Market share * (Unit revenue - Unit cost)

W.r.t market size:
- Population difference - Maharashtra is more populous than Haryana
Fair enough.
- Electricity penetration is probably much higher in Maharashtra
Good but this is not the case.
- Maharashtra has a much higher per capita income (affordability)
Not really.
- Lower price of product in Maharashtra. This could be lower upfront cost or lower running cost (price of
electricity)
Excellent! Electricity is much cheaper in Maharashtra.
W.r.t. market share:
- Little competition in Maharashtra
Competition is in fact much more.
- Better distribution network and marketing efforts
Yes, that could be a reason
- Mature market - weve probably been around for longer there
That is right. We were one of the first to enter the market and have retained much of the market share
W.r.t. unit profit:
- Product sold at a higher price in Maharashtra
Not true.
- Lesser production + distribution cost
That is not the case.
The profit figure discrepancy is driven by:
Lower cost of electricity in Maharashtra
Higher population in Maharashtra
Haryana being a new market whereas Maharashtra operations (incl. distribution) having been around for
much longer
That should be it. Thanks.
166
Case 25: Anti-smoking pill

Our client is a pharmaceutical company. They recently invented an anti-smoking pill. They want to know
to if they should introduce the pill in India and how they should go about it.
Do you have a metric we should use to judge whether the pill should be introduced in India? Otherwise we
should look at the Initial investment required, our profits and break-even point.
We want to maximize our profits and at least break-even on our investment in the first two years.
And by how we should go about entering, you mean?
Everything, where our customers are located, how we should market, pricing, etc.
So we are open to all geographies in India?
Yes.
Can you tell me more about the product?
Its a pill. Needs to be ingested once a day for 4 months. Once a pill is taken, a person does not feel the
need to smoke. It has been observed that when a 4month course is taken 50% of patients are able to quit
smoking permanently. It is a prescription pill rather than an OTC (off-the counter) meaning it can be
purchased only on a doctors prescription.
Overall Strategy
We will do two things:
1) Calculate,
Profits= (#Units sold) x (Price per unit-Variable Cost per unit)-Fixed Costs (or Investments)
We expect an INR 100mn investment to set up a plant to manufacture the drugs.
Then if our profits>=0, we will break even else not.
2) Analyze if we can establish value chain as required.
167
1. Profits
#Units sold=Market Size*Market Share
Market size:
Our Market size would basically comprise of Smokers who want to quit smoking, have access to a doctor
& a pharmacy and can afford our pill.
168
(Note the data on 7% smokers using nicotine patch comes after discussion with interviewer)
Important how you prioritize taking splits. It makes more sense to take the urban, rural divide later
as opposed to in the beginning since the %smokers will vary less within urban-rural divide. What
will vary significantly within the urban-rural divide is access to doctors and the split should come
before it.
In situations when you do not know the price of the product, it useful to take the income split in the
end. Another reason for taking income split later is that you have to establish need for the pill and
access to it is a prerequisite after which affordability can be considered by taking an income split.
169
Market size
Now that we know our market size, lets understand what our market share would be. Who are our
competitors? I cannot think of any direct competitors but alternatives like nicotine patches maybe indirect
competitors.
Yes, we have no direct competitors. Closest product addressing the need is the nicotine patch.
How effective is a nicotine patch? How is it used? What is its price?
After using the patch for four months less than 1% people are able to quit. It costs about Rs. 5 per patch
and has to be replaced per day.
So we have a much superior product both in terms of effectiveness and convenience of use. There is also
no stigma attached to our product unlike a nicotine patch which is visible on the arm.
We may not have competitors now, but can they come anytime soon. Do we have a patent? Is it likely
others might be able to develop the product, or illegal copies might be made?
We discovered the composition by a rare accident. We do not have a patent. But the composition is a trade
secret and cannot be mimicked (just like Coca-Cola). You can assume that we do not expect anyone else to
develop the product in the next 5 years.
Is there any regulatory barrier to entry?
No, we have the clearance to sell the pill.
It is fair to say that we have no competition in the market right now and we need to find the right price to
maximize our profits. Our potential market size is 11mn and we can now begin to price our product.
Cost based pricing
What will be our variable cost per pill?
Rs.1 per pill.
So our price has to be greater that Rs. 1. For a 4 month pack, this comes to Rs. 120
Competitor based pricing

This approach would not help us since we have no direct competitors. All we know is we can charge more
than the Nicotine patches priced at Rs.5(since our product is much more effective) if we are targeting the
same income segment that uses nicotine patches, but we don't know how much more we can charge. Also,
there may be a lower income segment that can be tapped into if we price the pills below Rs. 5. Correct me
if I'm wrong, I think generally 1 nicotine patch lasts for a day. For comparison sake, a 4 month nicotine
patch routine would cost: 120 days x 1 patch/day x Rs.5 per patch=Rs. 600.
170
Value based pricing

Here we will price the pill according to the value generated for the customer.
The question we need to answer is how much would someone be willing to pay to be able to quit smoking
with a 50% chance in 4 months in a convenient manner? A rich man would naturally be willing to pay
more than a poor man. Though the value of being able to quit smoking is huge (potential lung cancer
expenses saved, life-long savings on cigarettes), affordability is a constraint. Lets divide the population
into income groups
a) Upper middle class (>Rs. 32,000 pm)
b) Middle class (Rs. 16,000-Rs. 32,000pm)
c) Lower middle class (Rs. 8000-Rs. 16,000pm)
d) Below poverty line (<Rs.8, 000pm)
a) Upper middle class (>Rs. 32,000 pm)

Assuming an average income of Rs. 40,000 per month. Savings rate in India is 25% that leaves Rs.30, 000
bucks on expenditure. Expenses are distributed as follows in order of priority
Food: 30%
Housing (rent, renovations): 10%
Transportation and Communication: 10%
Health: 5%
Education: 5%
Discretionary spending (Clothes, furnishings, electronics, etc.): 40%
The money for the pills cannot come from the 25% savings since they are of long-term nature (saving for
home, marriage of children, pension etc.).Within expenses, a family might be able to carve out ~5% by
scaling down on the 6th category of discretionary spending. This would mean a spending of Rs. 1500 per
month on the smoking pills. This would mean we can price the pills up to Rs.50 per pill, some of the
savings also coming from not buying a cigarette that day. This means a price of Rs. 6,000 for a four month
pack.
This approach is difficult to get the first time, but can easily be remembered and in an actual
interview you can do a simplified version. Here is a simplified version:
-75% is expenditure of a family
-Savings cannot be touched because they are for long-term necessary purposes
- Im assuming a family can spend up to 10% of their expenditure on the pill.
171
If the interviewer asks for further detail then you can go into it.
b) Middle class (Rs. 16,000-Rs. 32,000 pm)
Assuming an average income of Rs. 20,000, and using the same analysis as for the upper middle class
bracket, we get a maximum spending of (20,000) x (75%) x (5%) =Rs.750 per month. This leads to a price
of Rs. 25 per pill.
c) Lower middle class (Rs. 8,000-Rs. 16,000 pm)
Let the average income be Rs.10, 000 pm for this group. For the lower middle class, the savings are lesser
of about 20% since their income is low. A greater percentage of expenditure is used for buying groceries
and other essentials. We will assume only 3% of their 80% expenditure is used for the pills. This gives us
(Rs. 10,000) x (80%) x (3%) =Rs.240 which give us a price of Rs. 8 per pill.
d) Below poverty line (<Rs.8, 000pm)
The average income is Rs. 4,000pm for this segment. There are hardly any savings and most of the
expenditure are for essential needs. The maximum a person could spend would be a little more than the
expense on the beedi (which he/she is no longer smoked on that day). The price is typically Rs. 1, we can
charge lets say Rs. 1.2 per pill to stay profitable. This means an expenditure of Rs. 36 per month which is
roughly 1% of the income and seems reasonable.
Price-elasticity based pricing

Since different income segments can afford a different price we will need to do a price-elasticity analysis
to figure out what is the right price to charge.
Our 11mn smokers are divided in this proportion
Upper Middle Class: 5%
Middleclass:
(~0.5 MN smokers)
25% (~2.5 MN smokers)
Lower Middle class: 40% (4.4 MN smokers)

Below poverty line: 30% (3.3 MN smokers)
For,
Price of Rs. 1.2, our profits would be (Rs. 0.2) x (120days) x (11mn ppl.)-Rs.100mn=~Rs.160mn
Price of Rs. 8, our profits would be (Rs. 7) x (120days) x (7.7mn ppl.)-Rs.100mn=~Rs.6400mn
Price of Rs. 25, our profits would be (Rs. 24) x (120days) x (3mn ppl.)-Rs. 100mn=~Rs. 8400mn
172
Price of Rs. 50, our profits would be (Rs. 49) x (120days) x (0.5mn)-Rs.100mn=~Rs. 2800mn
According to this, the right price would be Rs. 25 per pill since we can maximize our profits then and we
can easily break-even in the first two years. We should also explore ways through which we can pricedifferentiate our product so that we can charge higher income segments more and lower income segments
less. Price-differentiation strategies could involve better packaging and better taste of pills targeted
towards higher income groups.
2. Establishing the value chain

We can now see if we setting up the value-chain is feasible.
We can close the case here, thanks!
173
Case 26: Solar Lantern

The client is a German Electronics company. They have developed a solar lantern. They have hired us to
figure out whether they should enter the market in India.
Think of the good preliminary questions to ask here
What metric should we use to judge whether we should enter the market? Profits?
Yes. We would like to get a sense of what kind of profits to expect if we enter the market and how we
should go about achieving those profits.
Okay, I understand that we need to do a study to identify market potential for profits. I just wanted to be
clear on one more thing about our objectives. On the issue of how we should achieve those profits do you
mean things like- at what price we should sell, production, distribution, marketing...all of that?
We have a selling price in mind, but generally yes. Look into all aspects of the business.
In such a situation, though it seems daunting, go step-by-step through each area of the business
using whatever customized framework you have. As you go into details, use your discretion and the
interviewers guidance and interest to judge in how much detail you need to enter into for each
branch
Okay well come to pricing again. I had some other clarifying questions.
What parts of the value chain do we operate in?
We manufacture and use third parties for distribution.
What geography within India we are looking to enter?
We are open to servicing all of India but we expect to sell mainly in rural areas.
How does the product work?
The solar lantern requires 6 hours of bright sunlight to be fully-charged and can then be used for 8 hours
of illumination good enough for a small room.
Overall Strategy
Try to come up with an Overall Strategy to solve the case
We will address two issues:
1. Expected profits=Market size*Market share*Profit per unit sold
174
2. How to achieve expected profits: After we analyze what market share we can hope to achieve, we will
cover production, distribution and marketing constraints. We will also see if we need to do a Joint Venture
(JV) or Acquisition to overcome some of these constraints.
Problem Structuring
The above is a customized issue tree for this case. To understand how this has evolved from the
Victor Chengs standard business framework see Section 4.2. Its perfectly fine to have a different
issue tree from the one above as long as you cover the objectives. For example you may choose to
analyze both 1. & 2. together instead of separately.
Market Size
Lets begin by estimating our market size.
Notice that this a very proactive way of solving the case and that is how case-solving should be. At
the same time keep looking for acknowledgement from the interviewer so that you know youre on
the right track as well as seek out simplification of analysis which the interviewer might be keen on
giving.
175
(In the above estimation 80/20 and Segmentation refer to skills mentioned in Section 3 of the
book and demonstrated by the candidate here.)
Let the interviewer know that you have thought of demand even in urban areas and then neglect it
based on reasons. As a general rule, state the details and ask if you can make a simplifying
assumption so that the interviewer does not mistake your simplification as ignorance.
Market Share
Lets try and understand our market share. What are the key parameters of the product which determines
whether someone is going to buy it? How do we fare on them compared to our competitors?
Its important to understand what the product parameters which affect consumer choice for
product are. These parameters need to be assigned priority if possible and then compared with
competitors to gauge our market share. Example in clothing, quality of fabric is a parameter for
176
customers and for canned food, shelf life is important for distributors.
Price, lifespan of product, illumination are key parameters.
We have no direct competitors in the solar lantern market. Our lantern has a life of 2yrs.
So our selling price is Rs. 6000 as you mentioned earlier. Over 2 yrs., this would mean a family paying
little less than Rs.300 per month for illumination. We will need a financing plan based on EMI of course.
Will that increase costs? Negligibly, okay. Based on the income groups:
Below poverty line: These families have modest savings of about 10% meant for buying housing or
dealing with shocks like food/water shortage. Assuming avg. income of Rs. 3000pm, Rs. 300 represents
roughly 10% of income of BPL families. Since illumination cannot replace their more essential needs of
roti, kapda, makaan (which is more than 90% of income), they cannot afford it.
Lower Middle: These families save about 25% of their income meant for long term purposes like buying a
house. Assuming avg. income of Rs.10000 pm, this gives us Rs.7500 worth consumption. Rs. 300
represents 4% of their consumption. Illumination is necessary (kids going to school, etc.) for these
families and can purchase the lantern by scaling back on things like furniture, entertainment. Still Rs.300
pm is an expensive additional bill for them, we can assume ~50% can afford it.
Middle Class: Ill assume average income of Rs. 20,000 and savings of 30%. 300 represents ~2% of their
consumption. If lower middle class can afford it then so can the middle class since they earn more. They
can potentially even buy two lanterns, say 20% of the families.
(80%) x (1) + (20%) x (2) = 1.2 lanterns per family.
Note that the numbers used in this case above are subjective and should ideally come out from a
discussion with the interviewer
Now the question is what alternatives our customers have given there are no direct competitors.
1. Emergency lights, Torches and candles are temporary substitutes, so we wont look at those as they
cant provide electricity for substantial periods of time-8 hours per day like a lantern can.
2. Inverters/Generators: Hmm. I think these are usually used by upper middle class since its expensive
to buy them. Even an inverter is of no use in places where there are heavy power shortages. Ill assume
that ~20% of the Middle class dont need our product since they are using generators or inverters which
are obviously more effective than a lantern providing illumination for only a small room.
Any other substitutes?
3. Cheap replicas -They cost 600 bucks and last for 6 months. Illumination strength is much lesser and
many of them stop working a month after purchase.
Can we sufficiently distinguish our product from them using a hallmark logo, color change, creating
customer awareness to identify differentiating features?
177
Yes we can differentiate our product.

Candidate: Is there any negative in our product? None? German engineering, got it. Since we can
differentiate our product we can overcome the risk of customers getting poor service from the clones and
prevent our reputation from taking a hit. However, because the cloned lanterns are so cheap we will lose
some market share to them. Ill assume after our efforts of differentiation, overall we are losing 20%
Market share to the lanterns.
Outcome is not important here.
Given the mixed information about the clones -cheap but less effective -its perfectly fine to come to
a different conclusion. You might suggest that differentiating our product will be too difficult since
cloners always find a way to clone again. You might say the clone is much cheaper and with only
50% less illumination, it is still a better buy. You may suggest there is a potential 80% loss in
Market share. The outcome of the case is not important. The numbers can be discussed with the
interviewer along the way. The PROCESS is important: your thought structure, your awareness of
the factors playing in.
To put all of this info into perspective and to calculate expected profits.
Profit per unit

We know our price per unit, I want to know what our cost per unit is.
Here is some data:
These are the components of our selling price:
178
- Manufacturing cost: 40%

- Logistic costs: 25%
- Distribution costs: 10%
- Marketing: 15%
Based on this information our total cost is coming to be Rs. 5400. This means a profit of Rs. 600 per unit
sold.
Hence our expected profits are = (30mn lanterns) x (Rs.600) =Rs. 1800 crore
Since the lifespan of the lanterns is 2yrs, we can look to achieving this number in 2-3 years and then get
re-buyers subject to improving electricity outreach and changing income groups.
Thats okay you don't need to analyze the re-buyers bit.
We can also see what our investments are for the project and find our break-even point. Would you like
me to go into that?
We can skip that for now.
2. How to achieve expected profits
Since we know our expected profits now, I would like to answer how we can achieve it.
Production. Are we going to build a factory in India or import the lanterns? Build in India. Then, do we
have the capital investment required for it. Yes.
Can we meet the requirement of 30mn lamps in 2-3 years?
No we can produce only half that number.
Profits are capped at 900 crore [= (30mn/2) x (Rs. 600)]. Is there any way we can increase production?
No, we cannot.
Note that as we are limited by production, and not competition, this means that clones would have a
lesser impact on our profits, would be a good observation to point out.
Distribution. Do we have our own distribution channel?
No, we will need to outsource distribution to third parties.
We can possibly piggy-bank on existing distribution channels such as those for torches, basic electronics.
Yes Distribution can be taken care of, like that.
Marketing. We have already discussed the strategy to differentiate our product from clones. We should
also have local salesman to create awareness of our product and provide replacements to any defective
piece so that our product is not a risky investment for them.
179
All good ideas, I think we can close the case here.

*Synthesizes*
180
Pricing cases
Case 27: Anti-balding Pill
Our client is a large pharmaceutical company that has found a cure for baldness. It is a pill which will
rapidly regrow (within three months) your hair to the thickness it was when you were a teenager. The pill
is to be taken every day to maintain the thickness. Please estimate the size of the US market and then
decide what price to sell the product at.
So the company and its customer base is located in the US?
Yes.
Is this a prescription drug or an OTC (Over the Counter)?
Its a prescription drug
This is a useful question to ask when dealing with pharmaceuticals since it tells you how easily the
drug can be accessed-through a doctor or directly through a pharmacist.
Overall Strategy
We will first estimate the market size and then price the product. For the market size we will look at the
group of people who would require a cure for baldness. For pricing the product we will look at things like
cost of the product, competitor prices and try to quantify the value to customer.
Alright, move on.
Market Sizing
Price of the drug determines affordability and hence important while market sizing. We will leave the
income segment for later, since we do not know the price?
Yes.
Is it a unisex product, both men and women can use it?
Yes.
Are there any side-effects to the product?
It causes sexual dysfunction in 2% of men and women thinking of having children shouldnt take it since it
could cause birth defects.
181
How serious is this sexual dysfunction?

Relatively minor and non-permanent.
We can then say that men who are balding and need the product wont really be deterred. But we can
eliminate women likely to have children, which is basically all women under 40 to be conservative.
This is still an intermediate market size. The next step would be to see how many people can afford our
drug, but for that we will need to price the drug. Also some people, even though their hair is thin may not
want to go for an anti-balding treatment. This might be the case for the older people.
Alright, this is enough. You can proceed to pricing.
Pricing
What is the goal we are seeking to achieve when pricing the product? Maximizing profits?
Yes.
Note the goal could have been to capture a significant market share, or to break-even on the
investments of R&D in a fixed amount of time. So this question is important.
There are three ways we can look to price the product
1. Cost based pricing: We will see what the variable cost of our product is. Our price needs to be greater
than the variable cost, else we would not be profitable. We will also see what the fixed costs, mainly
R&D expenses, and a payback period the client has in mind are. Cost based pricing gives us a lower
cap for price.
2. Competitor based pricing: Our product price needs to be competitive else we will lose market share.
We can charge a premium over competitors if our product has an advantage. However we will also
have to discount it, if there are disadvantages.
182
3. Value (to-customer) based pricing: Here we try and gauge what is the value that is being created for
the customer to price our product. For this we can look at similar products in the cosmetic industry to
gauge how much customers value balding correction.
There is a fourth method of pricing called Price-Elasticity based pricing. This is useful when PriceElasticity data is available. It is also useful in a situation when none of the above methods are useful
Cost based pricing is not applicable since the cost is too low compared to value
Competitor based pricing is not applicable since there is no competition
Value based pricing is not applicable since value to customer is very high and cannot be
quantified
In such situations the ability to purchase the product is primarily dependent on affordability of
customers and using price-elasticity we can get a right price.
You will see examples of price-elasticity based pricing in other cases in the book.
1.Cost based pricing
Do we know what the cost of our product is?
Yes, it is $1 per pill.
That means for a three month course, our cost would be $90. Our price has to be greater than $90.
What are our fixed costs, do we have any payback period in mind?
You can assume that fixed costs were negligible for this case.
2.Competitor based pricing
We will now compare our product with competitors. Do we know who our primary competitors are? What
are their product characteristics?
183
Note that each of the above information is to be explicitly asked by the candidate as opposed to the
interviewer simply giving it away.
So the market is evenly split across A and B. In terms of effectiveness, brand image and accessibility A
and B are similar. They do differ in pricing. It seems that although B is priced higher, it is attracting as
many customers as A since there are no side effects. Also it is shampoo based as opposed to pills, what do
customers prefer?
Customers have a preference for shampoo since psychologically it gives them a feeling of using a hair
product as opposed to some kind of medicine.
Will this be a big factor in their consideration compared to our product which is highly effective?
Not much, I would say.
Based on this information, we know that the total price for the anti-balding treatment of competitors is
$450 for A and $540 for B respectively.
Compared to product A, we have a much better product-less serious side effects, greater effectiveness and
faster treatment. So we can at least price our product at $450. The monthly price would then be
$450/3=$150 per month.
Compared to product B, the clients product has greater effectiveness which should trump over the
disadvantage of minor side-effects (weve excluded women under 40) and the fact that our product is a pill
instead of a shampoo. At $150 per month, our product is still a cheaper buy since the total price comes to
$450 as opposed to $540 for product B. The combination of better price and effectiveness should attract
even those customers who have reservations about using a pill or the fact that there are minor side effects
with our product.
We could potentially price our product even greater than $150 due to its high effectiveness. But we should
have a competitive price initially to capture market share and later increase the price when our product
gains positive reviews.
On the other hand at $150 per month, we are making a good profit of $120 per month and hence we can
consider even reducing the price to $100 per month to capture market share even faster. But lets keep it at
$150 for now, we can reduce the price if we arent getting market share fast enough.
Good idea.
$150 is just a number we came up with here. It could be $100, it could be $200. Its the reasoning
behind your number which matters in the case-interview more than the number itself.
Sometimes it makes sense to even look at substitutes as competitors. Not in this case, since hair wigs
and a permanent solution are vastly different. However, lets say the client is a construction
material supplier. A new material is becoming popular in the market and the client wants to know
how to price it. Apart from looking at how the competitors are pricing the new material, it's also
useful to look at the price of the substitute, i.e., the traditional construction material to judge the
right price.
184
3.Value based pricing

We can now move on to Value based pricing to see if were in the right range. Here we can look at
products, services similar to getting a full head of hair and see what their prices are for comparison sake.
We can also look at services, which we know are definitely of less value or definitely of more value. The
prices of these services will give us a lower and upper cap of price range.
Sure, go ahead.
We can look at gym membership price in the US for 3 months as a comparable since it also addresses a
requirement improving external appearance. (Worth mentioning to the interviewer that a head of hair
would be more permanent than a ripped physique and some may value a head of hair over a shapely
body.)
We can look at other cosmetic products such as wrinkle removal creams and skin lightening, since the
value derived for the customer is with a similar mindset of improvements of facial looks.
As a lower-cap, we can think of something like drinking coffee at a Starbucks for 3 months. It would be
worth missing coffee every day for three months to have a full head of hair. A coffee costs $3, across three
months this would make it $270.
As an upper-cap we can look getting braces for teeth re-alignment. Since it requires regular dental
appointments, it would be more expensive than to take a pill for getting hair rejuvenation. Do you know
what would be the price of this would be in the US?
Thats okay, we don't need to go in the numbers. I like your approach. We can close the case here
For more cases on pricing, refer to Cases: 10, 22, 25 and 30.
185
Case 28: Consulting Firm to IITB
ABC consulting firm wants to reach IIT Bombay from their office in the least time possible on December
1, 2014 (the next placement season). They need you to figure out the best route. How would you go about
this problem?
ABCs office is at Nariman Point and IITB is in Powai, right?
Yes.
How do they travel from ABC office to IITB today? Cars?
That is correct.
What would you consider as the best-possible route? The route that takes the least amount of time to reach
destination?
Yes, exactly.
Are we open to exploring the option of changing our mode of transport to railways, airways? I wont
consider waterways since the geographical features do not permit such a commute.
Good question. Lets focus on travelling by road.
Do we have any constraint on the resources we can use to reach in the least possible time?
We intend to use our present resources. We have a fleet of cars.
Are we open to breaking the journey on different modes of transport on the road? For example, if there is
traffic jam we can consider walking out of it and then hiring another cab?
Interesting point. However, we would be using the same car throughout the journey.
Given that were trying to optimize journey time, I would want to draw out the factors affecting it first?
Sure, go ahead.
Overall strategy
Since our overall objective is to reduce time and
Time = Distance / Speed,
We can simplify our objective to:
186
(1) Reducing the distance travelled, and

(2) Increasing the Avg. speed
We want to identify factors which can help us achieve the above 2 sub-objectives.
Problem structuring
Although an attempt has been made to keep the solution MECE, there are scenarios (as this case)
where this is not entirely possible in the span of the case interview. Here, the candidate must strive
to keep it as MECE as possible by making smart segmentation. Such problems also allow for a lot of
room for creativity which the candidates are expected to exploit. E.g.: The above factors could
further include factors like number of signals on a route, presence of high traffic junctions on the
way etc.
Lets look at distance first. Since we are restricted to roads, I want to split roads as known routes and new
routes. New routes include (1) any new shortcuts, and (2) any other routes likely to be laid by Dec 1 which
might reduce our journey distance.
Lets say we have the required information. Why dont you tackle the other bucket - speed?
Sure. I want to split this bucket up into 2 more parts Internal factors and external factors. Internal factors
include (1) Type of vehicle car, bus etc. (2) Type of driver. We can split these buckets further to discuss
characteristics of vehicles and drivers affecting speed.
That wont be necessary. Move on.
External factors will depend on factors outside of the ones discussed. They include (1) Road Road
quality, speed bumps, signals, tolls etc. (2) Traffic (pedestrian/vehicular) Time of day, day of week,
other intangible factors (accidents, strikes etc.).
187
Okay, this sounds good. We will consider these factors the next time we come to IITB.
188
Case 29: Yash Raj Films

Your client is a Bollywood film production company Yash Raj Films (YRF). They have a story for a film.
They need your help to figure out whether the film will be a success. What do you do?
What determines whether a film is a success?
There are 2 types of films YRF makes (i) Commercial objective is to make profit and (ii) Noncommercial objective is to get critical appreciation and at least break even.
What kind of a story is this one?
This is a story about a girl who attempts to commit suicide. You could say it is a non-commercial film.
What do you mean by critical appreciation? How can we measure it?
All elements of the movie must be good. Why dont we discuss the latter at length?
Overall strategy
For this film to be a success, we need to ensure:
(1) Critical appreciation by analyzing elements of the film
(2)Breakeven by studying the revenue and cost of them film
This makes sense.
Problem structuring
(1)Critical appreciation
189
Talent required to shoot a movie: Script, acting, direction, music and cinematography are the most
important factors.
This is good. We have the best directors, music directors and cinematographers. There is no dance
number in the movie. What do you want to know about the script and the actors?
About the script, who are the writers?
There is an award winning writer who has written the script. Although he is new, he comes highly
recommended.
That sounds encouraging. I am guessing YRF will have good connections in the acting community. Can
we use that or are we looking to cast fresh faces?
We have actors who have done well in the theatre industry with a good number of plays to their names.
That is good too. I am guessing they all would fit the part.
Yes they do.
Studio and post production:
We have identified apt locations for the movie. Our post production team is very strong.
(2) Break even

Lets look at whether the film will break even.
Lets not get into the math here. What factors will you look at?
Revenue and cost.
We can handle the cost aspect. What factors in revenue?
Revenue will depend on:
#Cities movie is released in
# Theatres per city
Shows per week in every theatre
# of weeks a movie runs
Capacity of theatre
Average occupancy
Ticket prices
The occupancy will majorly depend on a factors like
190
Price of ticket
Okay.
Show times
They will be equally spread out throughout the day.
Competition. When are we looking to release it? Does the timeline clash with another big banner movie or
one with a similar theme?
Good question. We are looking to release it in the next 4 months. No major releases scheduled then.
If the timing is on a special weekend like Diwali/Holi or some other, we can expect a larger turnout of
movie-goers?
No its on a regular weekend, another reason why no big names are scheduled for release.
Occupancy will also depend on how much buzz there is for the movie. This would depend on doing movie
promotion through bill boards, participating in film festivals (like Toronto, Cannes), paid reviews and
having the cast present on TV shows, large public gatherings, etc.
This is a fair analysis. We can close the case here.
191
Case 30: Godzilla

Your client has just found a dinosaur lets call it Godzilla. She is looking for advice on what she should
do about it?
What is the objective of the client? Is it to get as much profit as possible?
Yes.
What does our client do?
How is that relevant?
It will determine what business the client would be comfortable doing since she would have experience in
that area of business.
She is a businesswoman. She owns a few theme parks all over India
Interesting! That gives us some direction.
Okay. I want to know more about the dinosaur. What kind is it? Where did the client find it? Are there any
more of them?
It is a T-rex the client found in the Lakshadweep islands near India. They searched for many more on the
island and on the ones around as well, but they didnt find anything
I dont have too much knowledge about T-rexes. Can they fly? Are they vegetarian?
No, they cannot fly. They are active predators (carnivores). For the time being though, Godzilla has been
sedated.
How big in size is it? Also, how long do T-rexes typically live? How old is Godzilla?
It is about 1 storey tall - 10 feet. Assume that the T-rex has at least 10 years of life to go.
Wouldnt the government or some wildlife organization simply take this animal from us for research
purposes?
Good point. Lets say your client lives in a place where finders are keepers.
Overall strategy
I want to classify all the options our client has into (1) to sell it, (2) to lease it out, and (3) to start a
business using it. I will further explore each of these and then we will freeze the best options we have.
Okay. Lets move to the last one which is the most interesting. Well come back to the rest after.
192
I want to study the various aspects of a dinosaur and then list out the businesses we can do leveraging each
of them.
Unique:
Lets start with the unique aspect of a dinosaur since I think that provides most potential. We could
trademark the brand of Godzilla and do the following:
Godzilla theme parks

Entertainment industry (movies, TV shows, commercials)
Official merchandise (apparel, toys, bags)
Restaurants, cafes
We could have an exhibition of Godzilla along with acts of:
Feeding the Godzilla

Seeing the Godzilla hunt
Safari
In fact, the above 2 can be done simultaneously.

Good.
Animal:
We could tie up with zoos and national parks to incorporate the dinosaur.
We do not want to tie up with anyone since we think their entry fees are too less. Even if they bump it up,
they would get a pretty large share. You will be better off with a solo exhibition.
I am guessing breeding dinosaurs is out of the question since we have only one? Is there a chance the
dinosaur could reproduce if it is a female? We could multiply our revenue by quite a bit.
Great idea but for now, assume Godzilla is male.
193
Historic:
I suppose a businesswoman wouldnt be interested in scientific research unless there is some chance of a
further business opportunity. We can of course sell to a research institution, but well discuss that later.
Museums rarely have live animals so that wouldnt be appropriate either. However, we can sell museums
specimens of the Godzillas skin, nails, footprints, etc. We can also give them opportunities to take
pictures or make a documentary for a fees.
Good ideas, lets say we want to go ahead with the idea of exhibiting the Godzilla.
How would you price the ticket to such an exhibition?
There are 4 ways to price the exhibition:

1. Cost based
Before we go into the actual cost, we would want to know what kind of exhibition this would be. Will it
be an exclusive premium experience for the rich or a general exhibition for larger audience base? That
will determine our costs and price. If its meant for a wider audience, we can keep it restricted to a solo
exhibition of the Godzilla with little frills. I would say we go for the solo exhibition, since it more
resembles our existing way of running theme parks.
Yes, lets go with the solo exhibition.
Note how the candidate has weighed two business models (Premium, exclusive or General)
qualitatively and then using business judgment suggested one of them.
What is the upfront investment required for such a business? What would the running costs be like?
The upfront cost is negligible. The upkeep and maintenance would be about Rs. 1 lakh per month.
I see. The base price of the ticket would be such that we earn at least Rs. 1 Lakh per month. How many
visitors can we expect in a month?
That would depend on the price but do you really think this is the best approach?
Youre right, for something as unique as a dinosaur, a value based approach is better. We will even skip
the competitor based approach since we have no real competitors.
2. Competitor based (skipped)
194
3. Value based
How will you determine the value for something like this?
Our Godzilla is not the one we know from the movie, its a much smaller version. Its more like an exotic
animal, and because the public is intrigued by dinosaurs there would be a desire to see it, but nothing
more. The value would be similar to going for a music concert or an amusement park which have prices in
the range of Rs 1000-10,000. Seeing the Godzilla would be a unique but easily accessible experience. I
would say music concerts and theme parks have more to offer in terms of an emotional + visual
experience. Seeing an exotic animal would be just be a visual experience. Id probably pay around Rs.
2000 to see it and hence price it around that. We can expect a lot of people coming to watch it in and
around the area. Once it has been exhibited in a particular city we can move it to a different city, assuming
its safe to do that.
Yeah, we can do that.
On the revenue front, we need 50 (=100,000/2000) people every month to break even. Given the hype that
will surround such an exhibition, we can certainly expect that. Should I calculate the revenues per month?
No need. Move on.
If you were to calculate the revenues, you would need to look into the following factors:
Monthly revenue =
(# of days the exhibition is open in a month)
X (# of hours it is open in a day)
X (# of batches that can be accommodated in an hour)
X (Batch capacity: max. no. of people that can be accommodated in one batch)
X (Batch occupancy in %)
X (Average price of each ticket)
4. Price elasticity based

Do we have any data which will help us arrive at the optimum pricing to maximize revenue?
No, we do not have any data on that.
We can also introduce some price differentiation to make a larger profit. We can provide more expensive
tickets for a premium experience where people get to see it hunt and from a closer range. And then we can
have a regular priced ticket.
195
Great! So this is what we would do in case we have to start a business. Lets discuss the options for
selling/leasing it out.
Off the top of your head, who do you think would be potential buyers?
Research institutes
Government
Zoos
Parks
Other business owners who want have the same ideas as we discussed before
Good. We can close the case here.
196
Case 31: Plot of land

Your client has a large plot of land in Mumbai. He wants you help him figure out what he should do with
it.
When a case is open ended, with no clear objectives, more number of preliminary questions are
warranted.
What are the goals of the client?
There are three objectives
1. Maximize profits
2. Get brand recognition
3. Reserve some space for a philanthropic cause
What is the order of priority of the three objectives, Im trying to gauge how important is each objective.
Good question. The order of priority is in the same order
-
Profits
Brand recognition
Philanthropy
How big is this plot of land? Where is it located in Mumbai? What are the surroundings like?
Its a huge piece of land, the size of IIT campus, located in the Phoenix Mills area. Its surrounded by
homes, offices, schools, restaurants, etc. Its a prime location.
Do we know what the background of the client is what kind of business is the company involved in?
Yes. The client was the owner of several textile mills and the land itself. The textile mills could no longer
be run profitably in Mumbai so they were shut down and what is left is the land. In addition to this the
clients procurement manager, operations manager and sales manager have decided to follow the client in
his future venture.
Are the skills of the managers textile industry-specific or can they be applied to other industries as well?
They have a lot of business experience and can be applied anywhere.
Overall Strategy
To solve this case I would like to approach each objective in the order of their priority.
Lets first see how we can maximize our profits.
197
Selling the land is not an option, as while it may get us money, we will not be able to get any brand
recognition through it unless we utilize the money, so that would be just pushing the problem one step
away.
Lets see how we can use the land other than selling it.
Since it is empty right now, it should be put to productive use by developing the land. We could choose
between three types of projects
-
Residential-Apartments, homes, bungalows

Commercial-Office space, Malls, restaurants, Shops, Schools, etc.
Industrial-Factories
Industries is not an option since regulation prevents any large scale manufacturing of goods in the area.
How would you judge between entering the commercial and residential space?
It will depend on where we can make more profits. This would be comprised of revenue and costs. For
revenue we can look at indicators such as price per sq. ft.
Lets say for the residential space the rate is Rs. 50,000 per sq. ft. For the commercial space it is Rs. 1000
per sq. ft.
Are these the prices at which properties can be purchased in the area? Does it not seem a little less for
commercial property?
50,000 sq. ft. is the purchase rate for residential property, whereas 1000 per sq. ft. is the annual lease rate
for commercial space in the area.
Okay. So it would not be fair to compare the two metrics, do we know what the purchase rate for
commercial space is?
How would you use the given information to judge which segment is more valuable to enter into from the
clients point of view?
We can extrapolate what the commercial property price would be from the commercial lease rate. This can
be done by calculating the Net Present Value. This involves adding the cash flows that leasing commercial
property will generate after discounting them to their present value.
The discount rate would depend on inflation rate, property appreciation, risks involved in the project.
Net Present Value is a financial concept useful to know. Check out Investopedia.com for more
explanation. Financial concepts like these are unlikely to be tested in a case-interview but if you
have, for example, an investment banking internship it can be tested.
In the actual calculation the time period of cash flows is infinite but the present value of successive cash
flows keeps decreasing.
198
To simplify calculation lets assume the net present value= Annual Lease Rate x 30 years.
This would give us Rs. 30,000 per sq. ft. Comparing this to the Rs. 50,000 sq. ft. purchase price for
residential property, entering the residential segment seems more favorable from the monetary standpoint.
However we also need to look at cost of developing the land for commercial and residential purposes
before we can take a call which segment is more lucrative.
Great. Lets go back to the different types of commercial projects you mentioned. You named Offices
spaces, malls, restaurants, schools etc. Is this exhaustive, can you expand on this list?
Its not exhaustive, I can expand on it.
Office Space
Restaurants, pubs, bars
Shopping complexes-electronic stores, garments, bags, furniture, grocery stores, supermarkets
Recreational activities-Amusement parks, Spas, Sports complex, Movie theatres
Schools, Colleges, Multi-purpose Hospitals, doctor clinics, gyms, parks
Its probably still not exhaustive but Ive expanded on the list.
Alright, till now we discussed about DEVELOPING and LEASING the land for commercial purposes.
Lets say we wanted to ENTER a particular commercial activity on our own, how would you decide which
commercial activity to enter from the list you gave?
Since our objective here is to maximize profits, I would look which business has a large customer demand
(Market Size), less competition and where we have some competitive advantage (Market Share).
Good, now if we focus on competitive advantage, what do you think is our competitive advantage? Then
we can see how to leverage our competitive advantage and enter a particular business.
Well, we do not really have any business presently. In terms of the resources we have the three managers,
experience in the textile industry and a lot of land. Hmm... I would think that having a HUGE amount of
land in a PRIME location of the financial capital is itself a unique advantage. So much land is not
available to one company or if it is, it is available in scattered pieces.
Exactly, and can you think of commercial activities which would greatly benefit from having such a big
piece of land in a prime location.
Hmm... Some of the ideas I can think of are
A large sports complex capable of hosting major international games such as Asian and CWG. But we
will have to see if it makes commercial sense
A world class MBA School which can significantly benefit from being inside the city
A big amusement park like Universal Studios or Disneyland
199
Good stuff, so as a lesson, when there are multiple attractive options from demand and competition point
of view, competitive advantage can be a key decider.
Note that in the above discussion the interviewer is testing for the candidates creativity and here
MECEness can be compromised.
However, lets say the client decides to go ahead with a combination of residential and commercial officespace type projects. How can we get a great brand recognition now as a land developer?
To gain brand recognition as a developer, there could be many things we do which will make our brand
name recognizable. We could
Construct an iconic building. It could have a unique shape such as the Shard or the Gherkin in London.
Or it could be the tallest skyscraper in the area.
We could have niche attractions, such as a horse race course, an 18-hole golf course, F1 track
We could make luxury apartments and invite a rich customer base to live. We can invite top
corporations to open their offices
We could invite celebrities to book homes in the region adding to the glamour quotient of the area
Gaining brand value will also translate into more profits.
Good ideas, and what could we do as a philanthropic cause.
Does the client have a particular cause in mind, any history with a particular NGO?
Not really.
There are several causes that the client can choose to pursue. We need to see where we can have a
maximum philanthropic impact with our available resource of land. This could possibly be free schooling
for unprivileged or differently abled children. It could be a hospital for the same. We could even provide
land to NGOs from where they can operate. A good idea could be to invite applications from NGOs with a
definite plan of how they would use the free land provided. We can also encourage our customers in our
main line of business to donate to our philanthropic cause.
Alright, this sounds good. We can close the case here.
200
Case 32: Sales force

Your client is a large pharmaceutical company in India. They want to cut 50% of their cost on the sales
force of their company. How will you help them decide how to go about it?
Think of all the preliminary questions here
What does the company structure in the sales force look like? What are their duties? What are their
salaries?
Good question. Here is the current salary structure.
Designation
Salary
Total people
Total salary
1 CEO
20x
20x
RH (Regional head)
10x
4 (4 RHs under 1 CEO)
40x
AH (Area head
4x
24 (6 AHs under 1 RH)
96x
SR (Sales representative)
240 (10 RH under 1 AH)
240x
396x
Roles:
CEO: Manage RHs and other work as a board member

RH: Manage AHs and other negligible work
AH: Manage SRs
SR: Meet doctors and sell medicines to them
Overall strategy
First, I want to identify ways of reducing costs at each level by reducing number of people or by reducing
their salaries. If at all we need to lay off employees, we should discuss the number of people and the basis
of laying them off.
I will start with the cost cutting of SRs.
You must be wondering why we are starting at the lowest rung of the hierarchy. The people in the
hierarchically higher roles manage people doing lower roles. Since we do not know how many
people we need in the lower roles, it is advisable that we start there in this case, the Sales
Representative level.
SR cost cuts
201
What are the duties of an SR?

There is a fixed amount of work to be done. There is a certain number of doctors in every area, each of
whom needs to be visited twice a month. Our SRs go to their clinics/hospitals and pitch the latest
medicines to them for about 30 minutes.
Hmm. So we need to minimize costs keeping in mind that the total work is constant. This could be done
by making the sales process more efficient by reducing time wasted. Secondly, I want to know if we can
reduce the total work itself - we probably dont need to go to every doctor OR change the style of pitching
our medicines.
Good point. Lets say we are not looking to change the style of pitching medicines to the doctors. Assume
that the total work remains constant.
To minimize:
Total cost = (# SRs per area) x (Cost per SR) x (#areas)
Lets work on reducing #SRs. Salary cuts will be our last resort since the client does not want to lose out
on talent to competitors. We want to have a presence in all areas because they are all profitable as of
now.
We should reduce #SRs without reducing the cumulative work they do so as to not lose revenue.
Reduce number of SRs
Constraint: Total work/day is a constant. Here work represents the number of pitches an SR makes
Total #pitches/day = (# SRs in an area) x (#pitches per SR per day) x (# of areas)
= (# SRs in an area) x (hours in shift) x (% time pitching) x (pitches/hour) x (# of areas)
If we want to reduce # SRs, we will need to increase other parameters.
Note that time of shift is from 9 am to 7 pm and it is not negotiable.
I wonder if we can increase the % pitching time somehow. Why is it not 100%? I want to start with areas
where % pitching time is minimum.
The pitching time is not 100% because of traveling, waiting time, snack breaks etc. Lets assume that %
working time for all SRs in all areas is 50%. The break-up of time is as follows:
(1) Working time - 50% (2) lunch/snack breaks 5%, (3) travel time 20%, (4) waiting time 15%, (5)
free time 10%
Strategy:
OK. First, I will make sure that an SR minimizes time devoted to all activities other than pitching. Next, I
202
will try to look for ways by which SRs can improve their productivity (so that more pitches are made per
unit time).
After we ensure that every SR is super-efficient, the SRs will naturally have a lot of time left over. We
could consider laying people off then.
Here, the travel duration presents maximum opportunity to save time since it accounts for 20% of
the total time spent by an SR every day. If this is a dead end, we move to the next largest category.
What does the travel time entail? Is the route optimized?

Travel time includes travel on a scooter from home to warehouse (where all medicines are picked up
from), then to all the clinics/hospitals (which they try to sell), back to the warehouse (to empty out the
stock) and then to the company to log the details of the days work. Routes are optimized.
Since the routes are optimized, I am checking if any of these trips are necessary. Why the trip to the
warehouse and back? Can we not let the SRs keep it for a week or so?
Interesting idea. Lets say the daily free time increases to 15%
Do they need to log the days details by going to the company? Is there a way to do it remotely or less
frequently? What do our competitors do?
We dont have any info on that but sure, there is device which lets you log details remotely. Lets say that
reduces travel time by another 5%. The free time is now 20%
Can we reduce the waiting time? How are medicines sold to the doctors today?
Meetings are set up with doctors and they get a chance to pitch their companys product. Typically,
doctors delay these meetings due to their unpredictable schedule. Nothing really can be done about it
I am guessing we cant reduce snack time.
Right.
The free time is 20% at this stage. We could cut that down to 0%. If we do, we will need fewer SRs
Only 8 per area.
Sure.
How can we increase their work/time OR productivity? What does the industry do to increase it? Training
programs, workshops etc. are suggestions.
Good idea. We can do that. Lets say we can double the speed of the sales pitch.
This means, we can halve the # of SRs. Hence, we are left with 4 SRs per area.
203
That is correct.
Now, the next part is to decide who gets fired and who does not.
There are a few parameters that are important when it comes to the role of a SR:
Performance Sales or Revenue that a person brings in is a good metric to judge performance
Experience Some SRs might be seniors who groom the fellow SRs. We might not want to fire them
I have a concern though. When we talk about performance, we need to account for the nature of the area
he is working in. E.g.: Pitching in some areas is more difficult as compared to others (possibly because of
less demand of medicines)
Good analysis. However, lets assume a standard level of difficulty in every area and we have ensured
that SRs have been allocated appropriate areas.
AH cost cuts
I will do a similar analysis to arrive at the number of RHs. You said that all AHs did was to manage SRs. I
am assuming that the work is proportional to the number of SRs under them.
Yes.
Hmm. So here too, we have to minimize the cost knowing that the total work is going to be the same.
To minimize:
Total cost = (# AHs in a region) x (Cost per AH) x (# of Regions)
All regions need to be tapped. Costs are last priority. Focus on reducing # of AHs.
Constraint: Here again the total work
Total work/day = (# AHs in a region) x (work per person) x (# of regions)
= (# AHs in a region) x (time of shift) x (% time working) x (Work/time) x (# of regions)
If we want to reduce # AHs, we will need to increase other parameters.

Lets say, you cannot change time of shift, productivity.
What is the maximum number of SRs an AH can handle? I want to investigate how much % time the AHs
would be working.
12.
204
Since now the #SRs per area have reduced to 4, will they be less busy?
They will now be busy only 1/3rd of the time.
Interesting So if we increase their working time 3 times to increase efficiency, we are left with just 1/3
AHs per area. Hence, an AH today could manage 3 areas. Can we club the areas such that there are 8 of
them instead of 24 and we can lay off the rest?
Excellent idea! We could most certainly do that.
We can judge the performance, experience for them as well so we can lay off 2/3 of them.
RH cost cuts
I would do a similar analysis for RH cost cuts.
Can you take me through it? Lets assume everything is perfectly efficient here currently and we are
focusing on reducing out the # of RHs.
Hmm. Since each RH managed 6 AHs earlier, to handle 8 AHs we will definitely need 2 RHs (considering
the other work is negligible). Is that correct? Also, can we club each of the 4 regions to form 2 bigger
regions?
Yes. The regions can be divided thus.
Here too, we can hold on to the 2 best RHs and fire 4 on the basis of the 2 parameters
CEO cost cuts
I am not sure we can do much about the CEO except reduce his salary. Are we open to that?
You are right. We can stop the cost cutting here. What does the structure look like at the moment?
Here is the new salary structure.
Designation
Salary
Total people
Total salary
1 CEO
20x
20x
RH (Regional head)
10x
2 (2 RHs under 1 CEO)
20x
AH (Area head
4x
8 (4 AHs under 1 RH)
32x
SR (Sales representative)
96 (12 RH under 1 AH)
96x
168x
205
We have been able to cut costs by ~55%. That is more than the client has asked.
Good. We can close the case here.
206
Appendix
Data Sheet
This section has certain basic statistics that keep recurring in cases. Most of the times you can come with
the numbers in the right range on your own. Weve just put some of these numbers in one place so that
you dont need to go looking for them or worry about the accuracy of the source.
Population segmentation by income

All India (Avg household* income)
-Middle Class (> Rs. 16,000 pm): 30%
-Lower Middle Class (Rs. 8,000 - Rs. 16,000 pm): 40%
-Below poverty line** (< Rs. 8,000 pm): 30%
*Avg household size in India is between 4 and 5
**Poverty line defined as living below $1.25 per person per day
Note, numbers 8,000 and 16,000 translate to roughly 1 Lakh and 2 Lakhs respectively on an annual basis.
Mumbai/Delhi/Chennai/Other Metro cities (Avg household* income)

-Upper Middle Class (>32,000 pm): 10%
-Middle Class (16,000-32,000 pm): 30%
-Lower Middle Class (8000-16,000 pm): 40%
-Below poverty line (<8000p month): 20%
*Avg household size is 4 in Urban India
Consumption patterns in India

Avg. Consumption rate in India ~75% of income (varies with income segment)
Avg. Savings rate in India ~25% of income (varies with income segment)
207
Avg Discretionary spending rate is 25% of total consumption
Avg. Consumption in India (varies with income segment)

Segment
Share of income
Food
40%
Housing
10%
Transport
15%
Education
5%
Health
5%
Discretionary spending
25%
The above is meant as a simple guideline, good enough for case-interviews and not an accurate
representation. As income increases essential spending on Food decreases, while discretionary spending
increases.
You do not need to remember the exact numbers, just remember expenditure on food is on average around
40%.
Population pattern in India/Mumbai

India: 1.25BN (can be taken as 1BN for ease in calculation)
50% of Indian population lies below the age of 25.
Region
Population
Area
Population Density
Mumbai
20mn
600 sq. km
~35,000 per sq. km
South-Bombay
20% of total
15% of total
~45,000 per sq. km
W Suburbs
25% of total
25% of total
~35,000 per sq. km
E Suburbs
25% of total
25% of total
~35,000 per sq. km
North Mumbai (Thane,

30% of total
35% of total
~30,000 per sq. km
Vashi)
In terms of average household income, South-Bombay is the richest area followed by Western Suburbs,
Eastern Suburbs and finally North Mumbai.
208

Case Interviews Cracked

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Case Interviews Cracked

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Case Interviews Cracked

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Case Interviews Cracked