Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 41 views

    Assessment Criteria For Language A: Literature: Written Assignment (SL/HL)

    Uploaded by

    embededodin
    The document outlines the assessment criteria for a written assignment in Language A: Literature for either Standard Level or Higher Level. It includes five criteria: A) fulfilling the requirements of the reflective statement, B) knowledge and understanding of the chosen work, C) appreciation of the writer's choices of language, structure, technique and style, D) organization and development of ideas with references to the work, and E) clarity, variety and accuracy of language used. Each criterion has level descriptors and point scales to evaluate student work.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Assessment Criteria For Language A: Literature: Written Assignment (SL/HL)

    Uploaded by

    embededodin
    41 views2 pages
    The document outlines the assessment criteria for a written assignment in Language A: Literature for either Standard Level or Higher Level. It includes five criteria: A) fulfilling the requirements of the reflective statement, B) knowledge and understanding of the chosen work, C) appreciation of the writer's choices of language, structure, technique and style, D) organization and development of ideas with references to the work, and E) clarity, variety and accuracy of language used. Each criterion has level descriptors and point scales to evaluate student work.

    Original Description:

    english useful stuff

    Original Title

    En Assessment Criteria Group

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document outlines the assessment criteria for a written assignment in Language A: Literature for either Standard Level or Higher Level. It includes five criteria: A) fulfilling the requirements of the reflective statement, B) knowledge and understanding of the chosen work, C) appreciation of the writer's choices of language, structure, technique and style, D) organization and development of ideas with references to the work, and E) clarity, variety and accuracy of language used. Each criterion has level descriptors and point scales to evaluate student work.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    41 views2 pages

    Assessment Criteria For Language A: Literature: Written Assignment (SL/HL)

    Uploaded by

    embededodin
    The document outlines the assessment criteria for a written assignment in Language A: Literature for either Standard Level or Higher Level. It includes five criteria: A) fulfilling the requirements of the reflective statement, B) knowledge and understanding of the chosen work, C) appreciation of the writer's choices of language, structure, technique and style, D) organization and development of ideas with references to the work, and E) clarity, variety and accuracy of language used. Each criterion has level descriptors and point scales to evaluate student work.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    Language A

    Assessment criteria for language A: Literature: Written assignment


    (SL/HL)
    Written assignment (SL/HL)
    Criterion A: Fulfilling the requirements of the reflective statement

    To what extent does the student show how his or her understanding of cultural and contextual elements was
    developed through the interactive oral?

    Note: The word limit for the reflective statement is 300400 words. If the word limit is exceeded, 1 mark will
    be deducted.
    Marks
    Level descriptor
    0
    The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
    Reflection on the interactive oral shows superficial development of the students understanding of
    1
    cultural and contextual elements.
    Reflection on the interactive oral shows some development of the students understanding of cultural
    2
    and contextual elements.
    Reflection on the interactive oral shows development of the students understanding of cultural and
    3
    contextual elements.
    Criterion B: Knowledge and understanding

    How effectively has the student used the topic and the essay to show knowledge and understanding of the
    chosen work?

    Marks
    Level descriptor
    0
    The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
    12
    The essay shows some knowledge but little understanding of the work used for the assignment.
    The essay shows knowledge and understanding of, and some insight into, the work used for the
    34
    assignment.
    The essay shows detailed knowledge and understanding of, and perceptive insight into, the work used
    56
    for the assignment.
    Criterion C: Appreciation of the writers choices

    To what extent does the student appreciate how the writers choices of language, structure, technique and style
    shape meaning?

    Marks
    Level descriptor
    0
    The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
    There is some mention, but little appreciation, of the ways in which language, structure, technique and
    12
    style shape meaning.

    There is adequate appreciation of the ways in which language, structure, technique and style shape
    meaning.
    There is excellent appreciation of the ways in which language, structure, technique and style shape
    meaning.

    34
    56

    Criterion D: Organization and development

    How effectively have the ideas been organized, and how well are references to the works integrated into the
    development of the ideas?

    Note: The word limit for the essay is 1,2001,500 words. If the word limit is exceeded, 2 marks will be
    deducted.
    Marks
    Level descriptor
    0
    The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
    1
    There is some attempt to organize ideas, but little use of examples from the works used.
    2
    Ideas are superficially organized and developed, with some integrated examples from the works used.
    Ideas are adequately organized and developed, with appropriately integrated examples from the works
    3
    used.
    4
    Ideas are effectively organized and developed, with well-integrated examples from the works used.
    Ideas are persuasively organized and developed, with effectively integrated examples from the works
    5
    used.
    Criterion E: Language

    How clear, varied and accurate is the language?


    How appropriate is the choice of register, style and terminology? (Register refers, in this context, to the
    students use of elements such as vocabulary, tone, sentence structure and terminology appropriate to the
    task.)

    Marks
    Level descriptor
    0
    The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
    Language is rarely clear and appropriate; there are many errors in grammar, vocabulary and sentence
    1
    construction, and little sense of register and style.
    Language is sometimes clear and carefully chosen; grammar, vocabulary and sentence construction are
    2
    fairly accurate, although errors and inconsistencies are apparent; the register and style are to some
    extent appropriate to the task.
    Language is clear and carefully chosen, with an adequate degree of accuracy in grammar, vocabulary
    3
    and sentence construction despite some lapses; register and style are mostly appropriate to the task.
    Language is clear and carefully chosen, with a good degree of accuracy in grammar, vocabulary and
    4
    sentence construction; register and style are consistently appropriate to the task.
    Language is very clear, effective, carefully chosen and precise, with a high degree of accuracy in
    5
    grammar, vocabulary and sentence construction; register and style are effective and appropriate to the
    task.

    You might also like