Girth Gear Wear
Girth Gear Wear
Girth Gear Wear
7/3/05
16:46
Page 69
Introduction
The operators of large gear driven equipment including
kilns, coolers, and grinding mills are frequently addressing
wear issues. Some of the components in these machines
are designed to function properly as they wear. Examples
of this include the support rings and carrying rollers on a
kiln or the liners in a grinding mill. Most components are
not designed to wear and therefore their performance
deteriorates over time. Examples of this include seals
(which leak as they wear), the shell (which can catastrophically fail), and the girth gearing (the topic of this
article). The question for all of these components ultimately becomes how much wear is too much? Answering
this question with certainty is difficult, but an assessment
and monitoring program will prevent unscheduled downtime and costly interruptions of production.
Kilns, coolers, and grinding mills are critical pieces of
equipment in any processing plant. One of the most
important components of these machines is the main
girth gear and mating pinion(s). This gearing is typically
custom made for each application and therefore the
lead time for replacement is measured in months, not
weeks. The cost of a girth gear set ranges from US$75
000 to over a US$1 million. With such a long lead time
and high cost, girth gearing is designed to last many
decades with proper maintenance.
Under ideal conditions, the gear and pinion teeth
should not wear. Ideal conditions include adequate lubrication of the correct type, perfect alignment, constant
69-75
7/3/05
16:46
Page 70
Effects of wear
The effects of wear range from minor to catastrophic. In
general, some wear is expected in girth gearing applications such as kilns, coolers, and grinding mills. This is
because the ideal conditions mentioned above never exist
in these applications. Girth gearing always has a combination of misalignment, varying load and contamination
resulting in at least mild wear. In addition, the material
being processed at most sites is abrasive, chemically active,
or both.
The effects of wear include:
Figure 5. Rippling and wear step. Note operating pitch diameter
is clearly visible.
Increased vibration.
Increased noise.
Loss of efficiency: increased power draw (amps).
Reduced load carrying capacity.
High localised stresses.
Cracking.
Catastrophic tooth failure.
69-75
7/3/05
16:46
Page 71
Adhesion.
Abrasion.
Scaling.
Polishing.
Corrosion.
Rippling.
Cavitation.
Erosion.
Electrical discharge.
Fretting corrosion.
Figure 8. Severe plastic flow results in top land material separation. This material should be removed immediately to prevent
debris going through mesh.
Frequent starts.
Variable speed operation.
Gear design (tooth geometry, rating).
Gear manufacturing (hardness, quality).
Overload.
Experience has shown that the gear design or manufacture is rarely the root cause of a tooth wear problem.
The maintenance practices of the site have much more
influence on the wear rate and therefore the operating
life of the gearing.
Solutions to wear
Each of the causes listed above can be investigated rela-
69-75
7/3/05
16:46
Page 72
Monitoring wear
69-75
7/3/05
16:46
Page 73
Figure 13. New gear profile with straight edge showing convex
shape. (Photo courtesy of The Falk Corp., Milwaukee, WI.)
Figure 14. Worn tooth profile with straight edge showing concave shape. (Photo courtesy of The Falk Corp., Milwaukee, WI.)
69-75
7/3/05
16:46
Page 74
Conclusion
There are many types and causes of girth gearing tooth
wear. It is critical to prevent or at least minimise tooth wear
to ensure a long, trouble free service life. Once wear is
detected, little can be done to correct it. The effects of
wear can be minimised with a proactive assessment and
monitoring program._____________________
References
1.