Journal of Psychoactive Drugs
Journal of Psychoactive Drugs
Journal of Psychoactive Drugs
To cite this article: Timothy Leary & Gunther M. Weil (1968) The Religious Experience: Its Production and Interpretation, Journal of
Psychoactive Drugs, 1:2, 3-23, DOI: 10.1080/02791072.1968.10524515
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02791072.1968.10524515
E=
PSYCHEDELIC READER
G u n t h e r M. vVeil, Editor
University Books, New H y d e Park, N.Y.
pp 191-213
Timothy Leary
Three y e a r s a g o o n a s u n n y afternoon in t h e g a r d e n of a C u e r n a v a c a
Villa, I a t e s e v e n of t h e s o - c a l l e d " s a c r e d mushrooms" w h i c h had b e e n g i v e n
t o m e by a s c i e n t i s t from t h e U n i v e r s i t y of M e x i c o . During t h e n e x t f i v e h o u r s ,
I w a s w h i r l e d through a n e x p e r i e n c e w h i c h c o u l d b e d e s c r i b e d i n many e x t r a v a g a n t m e t a p h o r s b u t w h i c h w a s a b o v e a l l a n d w i t h o u t q u e s t i o n t h e d e e p e s t rel i g i o u s e x p e r i e n c e of my l i f e .
S t a t e m e n t s a b o u t p e r s o n a l r e a c t i o n s , however p a s s i o n a t e , a r e a l w a y s
r e l a t i v e to t h e s p e a k e r ' s h i s t o r y a n d may h a v e l i t t l e g e n e r a l s i g n i f i c a n c e .
Next come t h e q u e s t i o n s "Why? a n d "So w h a t ?
'I
I'
There a r e many p r e d i s p o s i n g f a c t o r s - i n t e l l e c t u a l , e m o t i o n a l , s p i r i t u a l ,
s o c i a l - w h i c h cause o n e p e r s o n to b e ready for a d r a m a t i c mind-opening e x p e r i e n c e a n d w h i c h l e a d a n o t h e r to s h r i n k back from new l e v e l s of a w a r e n e s s . The
d i s c o v e r y w h a t t h e human brain p o s s e s s e s a n infinity of p o t e n t i a l i t i e s and c a n
o p e r a t e at u n e x p e c t e d s p a c e - t i m e d i m e n s i o n s left m e f e e l i n g e x h i l a r a t e d , a w e d ,
a n d q u i t e c o n v i n c e d t h a t I h a d a w a k e n e d from a long o n t o l o g i c a l s l e e p .
A profound t r a n s c e n d e n t e x p e r i e n c e s h o u l d l e a v e i n its w a k e a c h a n g e d
man a n d a c h a n g e d life. S i n c e my illumination of August, 1 9 6 0 , I h a v e d e v o t e d
most of my e n e r g i e s to try to u n d e r s t a n d t h e r e v e l a t o r y p o t e n t i a l i t i e s of t h e human
nervous s y s t e m a n d to m a k e t h e s e i n s i g h t s a v a i l a b l e t o o t h e r s .
I h a v e r e p e a t e d t h i s b i o c h e m i c a l a n d (to m e ) s a c r a m e n t a l r i t u a l o v e r f i f t y
times p e r s o n a l l y , a n d a l m o s t e v e r y time, I h a v e b e e n a w e d by r e l i g i o u s r e v e l a t i o n s a s s h a t t e r i n g as t h e f i r s t e x p e r i e n c e . During t h i s period I h a v e b e e n lucky
enough to c o l l a b o r a t e i n t h i s work w i t h more t h a n 50 s c i e n t i s t s a n d s c h o l a r s w h o
joined our v a r i o u s r e s e a r c h p r o j e c t s . W e h a v e a r r a n g e d t r a n s c e n d e n t e x p e r i e n c e s
for over o n e t h o u s a n d p e r s o n s from a l l w a l k s of life, i n c l u d i n g 69 f u l l - t i m e r e l i g i o u s p r o f e s s i o n a l s , a b o u t half of whom p r o f e s s t h e C h r i s t i a n or J e w i s h f a i t h a n d
about half of whom belong t o E a s t e r n r e l i g i o n s .
*Lecture d e l i v e r e d at a m e e t i n g of Lutheran p s y c h o l o g i s t s a n d o t h e r i n t e r e s t e d
p r o f e s s i o n a l s , s p o n s o r e d by t h e Board of T h e o l o g i c a l E d u c a t i o n , Lutheran C h u r c h
in America, i n c o n j u n c t i o n with t h e 7 1 s t Annual C o n v e n t i o n of t h e American Psyc h o l o g i c a l Association, P h i l a d e l p h i a , B e l l e v u e Stratford H o t e l , Aug. 30, 19 63.
I n c l u d e d i n t h i s r o s t e r a r e t w o c o l l e g e d e a n s , a divinity c o l l e g e p r e s i d e n t , t h r e e u n i v e r s i t y c h a p l a i n s , a n e x e c u t i v e of a r e l i g i o u s foundation, a
prominent r e l i g i o u s e d i t o r , a n d s e v e r a l d i s t i n g u i s h e d r e l i g i o u s p h i l o s o p h e r s . In
our r e s e a r c h files a n d i n c e r t a i n denominational offices t h e r e is building up a
l a r g e a n d q u i t e r e m a r k a b l e c o l l e c t i o n of r e p o r t s w h i c h w i l l b e p u b l i s h e d w h e n
t h e p o l i t i c a l a t m o s p h e r e b e c o m e s more t o l e r a n t . A t t h i s point it is c o n s e r v a t i v e
to state t h a t o v e r 75 per c e n t of t h e s e s u b j e c t s report i n t e n s e mystico-religious
r e s p o n s e s , a n d c o n s i d e r a b l y mot-? t h a n half c l a i m t h a t t h e y h a v e h a d t h e d e e p e s t
s p i r i t u a l e x p e r i e n c e of t h e i r life.
The i n t e r e s t g e n e r a t e d by t h i s r e s e a r c h l e d to t h e formation of a n informal
g r o u p of m i n i s t e r s , t h e o l o g i a n s a n d r e l i g i o u s p s y c h o l o g i s t s who h a v e b e e n meeting o n c e a month (summers e x c e p t e d ) for o v e r t w o y e a r s , w i t h a n a v e r a g e of 20
p e r s o n s i n a t t e n d a n c e . In a d d i t i o n t o arranging for s p i r i t u a l l y o r i e n t e d p s y c h e d e l i c s e s s i o n s a n d d i s c u s s i n g p r e p a r e d p a p e r s , t h i s g r o u p provided t h e s u p e r v i s o r y man-power for t h e d r a m a t i c "Good Friday" s t u d y , and w a s t h e o r i g i n a l
p l a n n i n g n u c l e u s of t h e o r g a n i z a t i o n w h i c h a s s u m e d s p o n s o r s h i p of o u r r e s e a r c h
i n consciousness-expansion: IF-IF (The I n t e r n a t i o n a l F e d e r a t i o n for I n t e r n a l
Freedom). The g e n e r a t i n g i m p u l s e a n d t n e o r i g i n a l l e a d e r s h i p of IFIF came from
a s e m i n a r i n r e l i g i o u s e x p e r i e n c e , a n d t h i s fact may b e r e l a t e d to t h e alarm w h i c h
IFIF a r o u s e d i n s o m e s e c u - l a r a n d p s y c h i a t r i c c i r c l e s .
THE "GOOD FRIDAY" STUDY, w h i c h h a s b e e n s e n s a t i o n a l i z e d r e c e n t l y
i n t h e p r e s s as "The M i r a c l e of M a r s h C h a p e l , d e s e r v e s further e l a b o r a t i o n
not o n l y a s a n e x a m p l e of a s e r i o u s , c o n t r o l l e d e x p e r i m e n t , involving o v e r 30
c o u r a g e o u s v o l u n t e e r s , but also a s a s y s t e m a t i c d e m o n s t r a t i o n of t h e r e l i g i o u s
a s p e c t s of t h e p s y c h e d e l i c r e v e l a t o r y e x p e r i e n c e . This s t u d y w a s t h e Ph.D.D i s s e r t a t i o n r e s e a r c h of a g r a d u a t e s t u d e n t i n t h e p h i l o s o p h y of religion a t
Harvard U n i v e r s i t y , w h o i s , i n c i d e n t a l l y , both a n M . D. a n d a Bachelor of
Divinity. This i n v e s t i g a t o r set o u t to d e t e r m i n e w h e t h e r t h e t r a n s c e n d e n t e x p e r i e n c e r e p o r t e d during p s y c h e d e l i c s e s s i o n s w a s s i m i l a r t o t h e m y s t i c a l e x p e r i e n c e r e p o r t e d by s a i n t s a n d famous r e l i g i o u s m y s t i c s .
I'
B e c a u s e t h e d i s s e r t a t i o n d e s c r i b i n g t h i s s t u d y h a s not y e t b e e n p u b l i s h e d , 1
any d e t a i l e d d i s c u s s i o n of t h e r e s u l t s would b e premature a n d unfair to t h e i n v e s tigator. I c a n s a y , however, t h a t t h e r e s u l t s c l e a r l y s u p p o r t t h e h y p o t h e s i s t h a t ,
w i t h a d e q u a t e preparation and i n a n environment w h i c h is s u p p o r t i v e a n d r e l i g i o u s ly meaningful, s u b j e c t s report m y s t i c a l e x p e r i e n c e s s i g n i f i c a n t l y more t h a n p l a c e b o
controls.
O u r s t u d i e s , n a t u r a l i s t i c a n d e x p e r i m e n t a l , t h u s d e m o n s t r a t e t h a t if t h e
e x p e c t a t i o n , p r e p a r a t i o n , a n d s e t t i n g a r e s p i r i t u a l , a n i n t e n s e m y s t i c a l or r e v e l atory e x p e r i e n c e c a n b e e x p e c t e d in from 4 0 t o 9 0 per c e n t of s u b j e c t s i n g e s t i n g
p s y c h e d e l i c drugs. T h e s e r e s u l t s may be a t t r i b u t e d to t h e b i a s of our r e s e a r c h
group, w h i c h h a s t a k e n t h e "far-out" a n d r a t h e r d a n g e r o u s p o s i t i o n t h a t t h e r e a r e
e x p e r i e n t i a l - s p i r i t u a l a s w e l l a s s e c u l a r b e h a v i o r a l p o t e n t i a l i t i e s of t h e n e r v o u s
s y s t e m . W h i l e w e s h a r e a n d follow t h e e p i s t e m o l o g y of s c i e n t i f i c p s y c h o l o g y
( o b j e c t i v e r e c o r d s ) , our b a s i c o n t o l o g i c a l a s s u m p t i o n s a r e c l o s e r to Jung t h a n t h e
Freud, c l o s e r to t h e m y s t i c s t h a n t o t h e t h e o l o g i a n s , c l o s e r to E i n s t e i n a n d Bohr
than t o Newton. In order t o c h e c k o n t h i s b i a s , let u s cast a c o m p a r a t i v e g l a n c e
a t t h e work of o t h e r r e s e a r c h g r o u p s i n t h i s f i e l d w h o b e g i n from more c o n v e n t i o n a l
ontological b a s e s
O s c a r Janiger, a p s y c h i a t r i s t , a n d W i l l i a m M c G l o t h l i n , a p s y c h o l o g i s t ,
have reported t h e r e a c t i o n s of 194 p s y c h e d e l i c s u b j e c t s . Seventy-three of t h e s e
took LSD a s part of a p s y c h o t h e r a p y program, a n d 1 2 1 w e r e v o l u n t e e r s . The religious "set" would not b e e x p e c t e d to d o m i n a t e t h e e x p e c t a t i o n s of t h e s e s u b j e c t s . The r e s u l t s , w h i c h a r e a b s t r a c t e d from a p a p e r p u b l i s h e d i n
Psyched e l i c Review,
a r e as f o l l o w s ;
ITEM
PER CENT
Janiger-McGlothlin
(non-re l i g iou s s et t ing)
...
N = 194
35
48
48
75
58
42
58
Two o t h e r s t u d i e s , o n e by Ditman et a l . , a n o t h e r by S a v a g e et a l . , u s e d
t h e same q u e s t i o n n a i r e , a l l o w i n g for inter-experiment comparison. Both Ditman
and Savage are psychiatrists, but the c l i n i c a l environment of the l a t t e r ' s study
is definitely more religious ( s u b j e c t s are shown religious articles during the
Summarizing t h e religious items of their questionnaires:
s e s s i o n , etc.)
ITEM
PER CENT
Ditman
(supportive)
environment)
N = 74
Savage
(supportive
env ir o nm e nt &
some religious
s t i m uli)
N =96
49
32
85
83
40
90
F e e l it (LSD) w a s t h e g r e a t e s t
thing that ever happened t o me:
A religious experience.
:
A greater awareness of God or a
Higher Power, or a n Ultimate
reality:
..
Here, then, w'e have five scientific s t u d i e s by qualified investigators -Ditman e t al., 5
the four naturalistic s t u d i e s by Leaxy et a l . ,
Savage et a l . ,
and the triple-blind study in the Harvard dissertation
and Janiger-McGlothlin,
mentioned earlier--yielding data which indicate that (1) if t h e setting is supportive but not spiritual, between 40 to 75 per cent of psychedelic s u b j e c t s w i l l
report intense and life-changing religious experiences: and t h a t (2) if the set and
setting a r e supportive and spiritual, then from 40 to 90 per c e n t of the experiences
w i l l be revelatory and mystico-religious.
It is hard t o see how t h e s e r e s u l t s c a n b e disregarded by t h o s e who are
concerned with spiritual growth and religious development. These data a r e even
more interesting b e c a u s e the experiments took place during a n historical era
when mysticism, individual religious e c s t a s y ( a s opposkd t o religious behavior),
w a s highly s u s p e c t , and when the c l a s s i c , direct, non-verbal means of revelation and consciousness-expansion s u c h a s meditation, yoga, fasting, monastic
withdrawal and sacramental foods and drugs were surrounded by a n aura of fear,
clandestine secrecy, a c t i v e s o c i a l sanction, and even imprisonment.
The 69
professional workers in religious vocations who partook of psychedelic s u b s t a n c e s
(noted earlier), were responsible, respected, thoughtful, and moral individuals
who were grimly aware of t h e controversial nature of the procedure and aware that
their reputations and their jobs might be undermined (and, as a matter of fact,
have been and are today being threatened for some of them). Still the results
read: 75% spiritual revelation. It may w e l l b e that the most i n t e n s e religious
experience, like t h e finest m e t a l , requires fire, the heat of external bureaucratic opposition, t o produce the k e e n e s t edge. When the day comes--as it
surely will--that sacramental biochemicals like LSD w i l l be as routinely and
tamely used as organ music and i n c e n s e to a s s i s t in the attainment of religious
experience, i t may w e l l be that t h e ego-shattering effect of t h e drug w i l l be
diminished. Such may be one a s p e c t of t h e paradoxical nature of religious experience.
* * * *
6
The religious experience is the e c s t a t i c , incontrovertibly certain, subjective discovery of answers to four b a s i c spiritual questions. There c a n be, of
course, absolute subjective certainty i n regard t o s e c u l a r questions: "Is t h i s
the girl I love? I s Fidel Castro a wicked man? Are the Yankees the b e s t b a s e ball t e a m ? " But issues which do not involve the four b a s i c questions belong t o
secular games, and s u c h convictions and f a i t h s , however deeply held, c a n b e
distinguished from the religious, Liturgical practices, rituals, dogmas, theological speculations, c a n be and too often are secular, i. e . , completely divorced
from the spiritual experience.
What are t h e s e four b a s i c spiritual q u e s t i o n s ? There is the UltimatePower question, the Life question, the Human-Destiny question, and the Ego
question.
1.
2.
3.
4.
While one may disagree with the wording, I think most thoughtful peoplenhilosophers or not- c a n agree on something l i k e t h i s l i s t of b a s i c i s s u e s . Do
not speak of the great religous statements-Eastern or monotheistic-speak directly
to t h e s e four questions.
Now one important f a c t about t h e s e questions is that they a r e continually
being answered and re-answered, not only by a l l the religions of the world but
a l s o by the data of the natural s c i e n c e s , Read t h e s e questions again from the
standpoint of the g o a l s of (1) astronomy-physics, (2) biochemistry, (3) g e n e t i c s ,
paleontology, and evolutiorlary theory, (4) neurology.
W e a r e all aware of the unhappy fact that both s c i e n c e and religion are
too often diverted towards s e c u l a r game g o a l s . Various pressures demand that
laboratory and church forget t h e s e b a s i c questions and instead provide distractions, illusory protection, narcotic comfort, Most of us dread confrontation with
W e are treading here on very tricky ground. When we read the reports
of LSD s u b j e c t s , w e a r e doubly limited. First, they can only speak in the vocabulary they know, and for the most part they do not p o s s e s s t h e lexicon and training of energy s c i e n t i s t s . Second, w e researchers only find what w e are prepared
to look for, and too often w e think in crude psychological-jargon concepts: moods,
emotions, value judgments, diagnostic categories.
In recent months w e have re-examined our data and have begun to interview
s u b j e c t s from the perspective of this present hypothesis. The results are interesting. To s p e l l them out in brief detail I am going t o review some of the current
scientific answers to t h e s e four b a s i c questions and then compare them with reports from psychedelic subjects.
..
'
..
I could see t h e whole history and evolution along which man h a s come.
I w a s moving into t h e future and saw t h e old cycle of peace and war, good
times a n d bad times, starting to repeat, and I s a i d , "The same old thing
again, Oh God! It has changed though, it is different," and I thought of
the r i s e of man from animal t o spiritual being. But I w a s still moving into
the future and I saw the whole planet destroyed and all history, evolution,
and human efforts being wiped out in t h i s one ultimate destructive act of
God.
10
(2)
..
I'
Life is t h e striving c y c l e , of repetitious reproductive energy transformations. Moving, twisting, devouring, changing, t h e unit of life is t h e
cell. And the blueprint is the g e n e t i c code, the two nucleic a c i d s - The long,
intertwined, duplicating c h a i n s of DNA and the controlling regulation of RNA"which determine the structure of the living s u b s t a n c e " .
And where is it going? Exactly like t h e old Hindu myths of cyclical
rotation, t h e astrophysicists tell us that life is a temporary sequence which
occurs a t a brief midpoint in t h e planetary cycle. Terrestrial life began around
four billion y e a r s A.B. ("after t h e beginning" of our solar cycle) and will run
for another two billion y e a r s or so. A t t h a t time the solar furnace will burn so
hot that the minor planets (including Earth) will boil, bubble and burn out. In
other planetary systems the t i m e s p a n s are different, but t h e c y c l e is probably
the same.
There comes a n intermediate s t a g e in the temperature history of a planet
which can nourish living forms, and then life merges into the final unifying fire.
Data here, indeed, for a n awesome cosmology.
(a)
(b)
..
(c)
(3)
A.
The flame of life which moves every living form, including the cell cluster
you c a n yourself, began, w e a r e told, a s a tiny single-celled,spat-k in the lower
pre-Cambrian mud; then p a s s e d over in steady transformations t o more complex
forms. W e like to speak of higher forms, but l e t s not ignore or patronize the
single-cell game. I t s s t i l l quite thriving, thank you. Next, your a n c e s t r a l fire
glowed in s e a w e e d , a l g a e , f l a g e l l a t e , sponge, coral (about one billion y e a r s ago);
then f i s h , fern, scorpion, milliped (about 600 million y e a r s ago). Every c e l l in
your body t r a c e s back (about 4 5 0 million y e a r s ago) t o t h e same light-life flickering in amphibian (and what a fateful and questionable decision t o l e a v e t h e seashould w e have done it?)-until, one million y e a r s ago, comes t h e aureole glory of A
Australopithecus *
12
full flame of recent man, our older Stone Age, Neolithic brothers, our Bronze
and Iron Age s e l v e s .
The r a c e , far from being culminated, has j u s t begun:
What next?
..
...
..
B.
I ' m going t o call for help. I could appeal to quotes from Gamow
the cosmologist, or Eiseley t h e anthropologist, or Hoyle the astronomer,
or Teilhard du Chardin t h e theological biologist, or Aldous Huxley the great
visionary prqphet of our times, or Julian Huxley whose pharmacological predictions sound like science-fiction. I could c a l l upon a hundred articulate
s c i e n t i s t s who talk in dazed poetry about the spiritual implications of their
work. Instead, I am going to read a p a s s a g e by the German anthropologist
Egon Freiherr von Eickstedt. The topic is the spiritual attitude of
Australopithecus. The point is t h a t t h i s description of the world-view
of a tiny monkey-man who lived a million y e a r s ago could be a quote from
any one of a hundred LSD reports I ' v e read in the last three y e a r s . Von
Eickstedt's research l e a d s him to s a y that,
In t h e way of experience there is dominant, throughout, a kaleidos c o p i c interrelated world, Feeling and perception are hardly separa t e d in the world of visions; s p a c e and time are j u s t floating environmental qualities.. . T h u s the border between I and not-I is only a t
the border of o n e ' s own and actually experienced, perceptible world..
But this by no means denotes merely b e s t i a l brutality and c o a r s e n e s s
which is s o erroneously and often ascribed t o the beginnings of humanity. Quite t h e reverse. The thymality within his own circle means
j u s t the opposite, tenderness, goodness and cheerfulness, and allows
with complete justification the presumption of a picture of intimate
family life and t h e s p e c i f i c teaching of the children, a l s o need of
ornament, dance and much happiness.
T h u s the extremes of feeling
swing with the mood between fear and love, and the dread of t h e unknowable.. 11
14
(4)
A.
The S c i e n t i f i c Answer:
is c o m p o s e d of a b o u t 1 0 b i l l i o n n e r v e c e l l s , any o n e of w h i c h may
c o n n e c t w i t h as many as 2 5 , 0 0 0 o t h e r n e r v e c e l l s . The number of interc o n n e c t i o n s w h i c h t h i s a d d s u p to w o u l d s t a g g e r e v e n a n astronomer-and
a s t r o n o m e r s a r e u s e d to d e a l i n g w i t h a s t r o n o m i c a l numbers. The number
is f a r g r e a t e r t h a n a l l t h e atoms i n t h e u n i v e r s e .
. T h i s is why p h y s i o l ogists remain u n i m p r e s s e d w i t h c o m p u t e r s . A computer s o p h i s t i c a t e d
e n o u g h to h a n d l e t h i s number of i n t e r c o n n e c t i o n s would h a v e t o b e big
e n o u g h to c o v e r t h e e a r t h . l 2
..
from..
is a tiny
Your
100,000
(a)
I w a s d e l i g h t e d to see t h a t my s k i n w a s d i s s o l v i n g in t i n y p a r t i c l e s
a n d f l o a t i n g a w a y . I f e l t as though my o u t e r s h e l l w a s d i s i n t e g r a t i n g ,
15
* * * * *
W h e n w e r e a d a b o u t t h e c u r r e n t f i n d i n g s of t h e e n e r g y s c i e n c e s s u c h
a s t h o s e I h a v e j u s t r e v i e w e d , how c a n our r e a c t i o n b e o t h e r t h a n r e v e r e n t
a w e a t t h e g r a n d e u r of t h e s e o b s e r v a t i o n s , at t h e s t a g g e r i n g complexity of
16
17
18
have any idea how the Divine Process presents It'self. If a s k e d , they tend t o
become embarrassed, intellectual, e v a s i v e . The adored cartoonists of t h e
Renaissance portray the Ultimate Power a s a Dove, or a Flaming Bush, or a s a
man--venerable, with a white beard, or on a Cross, or a s a Baby, or a Sage
s e a t e d in the Full Lotus Position. Are t h e s e not incarnations, temporary
housings, of the Great Energy P r o c e s s ?
Last f a l l a minister and h i s w i f e , a s part of a courageous and dedicated pursuit of illumination, took a psychedelic biochemical c a l l e d dimethyl tryptamine. This wondrous alkaloid (which closely approximates serotonin, the
natural "lubricant" of our higher nervous system) produces the most intense
psychedelic effect of any sacramental food or drug. In 2 5 minutes (about the
duration of the average sermon), you a r e whirled through t h e energy dance, the
cosmic process, a t the highest psychedelic s p e e d . T h e 2 5 minutes a r e s e n s e d
a s lasting for a second and for a billion-year Kalpa. After the s e s s i o n , the
minister complained that t h e experience, although shattering and revelatory, w a s
disappointing b e c a u s e it w a s "content-free"--so physical, s o unfamiliar, so
scientific, like being beamed through microscopic panoramas, like being oscillated through cellular functions a t radar acceleration. Well, what do you
expect? If God were to t a k e you on a v i s i t through His "workshop", do you
think you'd walk or g b by b u s ? Do you really think it would be a stroll through
a c e l e s t i a l Madame Tussard waxworks? Dear friends, the Divine Product is
evident in every s e c u l a r event. The Divine Product we c a n see. But the Divine
Process operates in time dimensions which are far beyond cut routine, secular,
space-time limits. Wave vibrations, energy dance, cellular transactions. Our
s c i e n c e describes t h i s logically. Our brains may be capable of dealing with
t h e s e p r o c e s s e s experientially.
So here we are. The Great Process h a s placed in our hands d key t o
this direct visionary wgrld. I s it hard for u s t o a c c e p t that t h e key might be a n
organic molecule and not a new myth or a new word?
* * * * * * *
And where do we g o ? There a r e i n the United States today s e v e r a l
hundred thousand persons who have experienced what I have attempted to
describe to you tonight- a psychedelic, religious revelation. There are, I
would estimate, s e v e r a l million equally thoughtful people who have heard
the joyous tidings and who are waiting patiently but determinedly for their
psychedelic moment t o come.
There is, of c o u r s e , the expected opposition. The classic conflict
of the religious drama-always changing, always the same. The doctrine (which
w a s originally someone's experience) now threatened by the new experience.
This time t h e administrators have a s s i g n e d the inquisitorial role to t h e psychiatrists, whose proprietary claims t o a revealed understanding of t h e mind
and whose antagonism t o consciousness-expansion are w e l l known t o you.
19
The clamor over psychedelic drugs is not reaching 'full crescendo. You
have heard rumors and you have read the press a s s a u l t s and the slick-magazine
As sophisticated adults you have perhaps begun t o
attacks-by-innuendo.
wonder: why the hysterical outcry? As s c i e n t i s t s you a r e beginning t o ask:
Where is the evidence? A s educated m e n w i t h a n eye for history, you are, I
itrust, beginning to s u s p e c t that w e ' v e been through this many times before.
In the current h a s s l e over psychedelic plants and drugs, you are witnessing a good-old-fashioned, traditional, religious controversy. On the one s i d e
the psychedelic visionaries, somewhat uncertain about the validity of their revelations, embarrassedly speaking in new tongues (there never is, you know,
the satisfaction of a sound, right academic language for the new vision of the
Divine), h a r a s s e d by the knowledge of their own human frailty, surrounded by
the inevitable legion of eccentric would-be followers looking for a new panacea,
always i n grave doubt about their own motivation--(hero? martyr? crank?
crackpot?)--always on the verge of losing their material achievements--(job,
reputation, long-suffering wife, conventional friends, parental approval);
always under t h e fire of the power -holders. And on the other side: t h e establishment (the administrators, the police, the fund-granting foundations, the
job-givers) pronouncing their familiar lines in the drama: "Danger ! Madness !
Unsound! Intellectual corruption of youth ! Irreparable damage ! Cultism !
The i s s u e of chemical expansion of c o n s c i o u s n e s s is hard upon u s . During the
next months, every avenue of propaganda is going t o barrage you with the
arguments. You c a n hardly e s c a p e i t . You a r e going t o be pressed for a position. Internal freedom is becoming a major religious and civil-rights controversy.
I'
How c a n you d e c i d e ? How c a n you judge? Well, i t ' s really quite simple.
Whenever you hear anyone sounding off on internal freedom and consciousnessexpanding foods and drugs--whether pro or con--check o u t t h e s e questions:
(1) Is your advisor talking from direct experience, or simple repeating
c l i c h e s ? Theologians and intellectuals often depreciate "experience" in favor
of f a c t and concept. This c l a s s i c debate is falsely labeled. Most often it
becomes a case of "experience" v e r s u s "inexperience".
20
(6) When we s p e a k , w e s a y little about t h e subject-matter and disc l o s e mainly the s t a t e of our own mind. Does your psychedelic advisor u s e
terms which are positive, pro-life, spiritual, inspiring, opening, b a s e d on
faith in the future, faith in your potential, or does h e betray a mind o b s e s s e d
by danger, material concern, by imaginary terrors, administrative caution or
e s s e n t i a l distrust in your potential. Dear friends, there is nothing in life t o
fear, no spiritual game c a n be lost. The choice is not double-bind but doublewin. 14
(7) If h e is against what he c a l l s "artificial methods of illumination",
ask him what constitutes the natural. Words? Ritua s ? Tribal c u s t o m s ?
Alkaloids ? Psychedelic v e g e t a b l e s ?
* * * * * * *
SUMMARY
The outline of t h i s paper c a n be summarized a s follows:
(1) Evidence is cited t h a t , depending on the s e t and setting, from
40 to 9 0 per cent of psychedelic s u b j e c t s report intense religious experiences.
( 2 ) The religious experience w a s defined a s the e c s t a t i c , incontrovertibly certain, subjective discovery of answers to four b a s i c questions which
concern ultimate power and design, life, man and self. It w a s pointed out that
science attempts t o provide objective, external answers t o t h e s e same questions.
( 3 ) We considered the hypothesis t h a t the human being might be a b l e t o
become directly aware of energy exchanges and biological p r o c e s s e s for which
w e now have no language and no perceptual training. Psychedelic foods and
21
drugs were suggested as one key t o t h e s e neurological potentials, and subjective reports from LSD s e s s i o n s w e r e compared with current findings from the
energy s c i e n c e s .
(4) The current controversy over t h e politics of t h e nervous system
22
REFERENCES
Leary, T., Litwin, G.H., a n d M e t z n e r , R., " R e a c t i o n s to P s i l o c y b i n Admini s t e r e d in a Su p p o rtiv e Environment." J. N e r v o u s & M e n t a l D i s e a s e , Vol. 1 3 7
No. 6, ( D e c e m b e r 1 9 6 3 ) 561-573.
S a v a g e , C., Harman, W . W . , F a d ima n , Jr., a n d S a v a g e , E . , "A Follow-up
N o t e o n t h e P s y c h e d e l i c Ex pe rie n c e . " ( P a p e r d e l i v e r e d at a me e tin g of t h e
American P s y c h i a t r i c A s s o c i a t i o n , St. L o u is , Mo ., M a y , 1 9 63 .)
Ditman, K.S., Haymon, M., a n d W h i t t l e s e y , J.R. B., N a t u r e a n d F re q u e n c y of
C l a i m s Fo llo win g LSD." J. N e r v o u s & M e n t a l D i s e a s e , Vol. 1 3 4 (1962), 346-352.
M c G l o t h l i n , W.H., Lona-Lastinq Effects of LSD o n C e r t a i n Attitu d e s in Normals:
An ExDerimental Proposal. ( P r iv a te ly p rin te d , T h e Rand C o rp o ra tio n , S a n t a M o n i c a ,
C a l i f o r n i a , Ju n e 1 9 6 2 . Pp. 56.) Cf. M c G l o t h l i n , W . H . , C o h e n , S., & Mc Glothlin,
M . S . , Short-Term Effects of LSD o n Anxiety, A ttitu d e s , a n d Performance, Ibid.,
June 1963. Pp 1 5 .
A c o n tin u in g p resen t-d ay i n s t a n c e is t h e case of me mb e r s of t h z N a t i v e American
Church , a duly c o n s t i t u t e d a n d r e c o g n i z e d r e l i g i o u s d e n o m i n a t i o n numbering alm o s t a q u a r t e r of a m illio n a d h e r e n t s . A g o o d p o p u la r a c c o u n t of t h e i r s i t u a t i o n
is p r e s e n t e d i n " P e y o t e , " by A. Stump, i n Saga, Vol. 2 6 , No. 3 (June 19631,
46-49, 81-83. Cf. Th e Supreme C o u r t ' s d e c i s i o n , Q!iver 17. U d a ll, 3 0 6 F2d 819
( 1962 ). The m o s t r e c e n t l y p r o p o s e d l e g i s l a t i o n a g a i n s t P e y o t e is s e e n i n t h e
C o n q r e s s i o n a l Record (Ho u s e ) for D e c . 1 3 , 1 9 6 3 . W. La Barrels fa mo u s book,
The Pey o te Cu lt, w i l l be r e p r i n t e d in a n e n l a r g e d e d i t i o n i n August, 1 9 6 4 , by t h e
S ho e String P r e s s (Ham d en , Conn.) a n d w i l l bring t h e e n t i r e d i s c u s s i o n up to
d a t e . For a good g e n e r a l s t a t e m e n t i n a n o t h e r a r e a of r e s e a r c h , see "The H alluc i n o g e n i c D r u g s , " by Barron, Jarvik, a n d Bunnell. Sci. Amer., Vol. 2 1 0 , No. 4
(April 19 64), 29 -3 7.
A s s o c i a t i o n P r e s s , 1963.
l1 I b i d . , p. 238