The Emotional City
The Emotional City
The Emotional City
significant role in the city's development how can architecture continue to operate in
Adam Caruso
Many cities do have physical structures that originate from a priori ideas; from a
good faith?
beginning of the twentieth century, networks of squares and parks, the replacement of
certain way. This is similar to being at home, you know when you feel at home, when
city walls with Boulevards are also the result of abstract political ideas put into
you can take your shoes off and relax. This feeling of being at home can be
practice. Very quickly, however, an incredibly complex set of conditions are brought to
communicated to other people even though they live in different kinds of homes.
bear onto these ideological origins, and each city develops in subtly different ways.
Similarly, the feeling of being in the city is not easily confused with being in a shopping
mall, or being in a theme park, and most people are sensitive to these differences.
ownership. Law in the widest sense, has a powerful effect. As these many, changing
The architectural vanguard has not recently much discussed the significance, or the
forces assert themselves, each city, or each part of large cities, assumes its own
defining characteristics of homeyness. At the turn of the century, the propriety of the
morphology. Each city has its own size and configuration of block, has its own version
home was a central theme in the discourses of architects like Semper and Loos, who
of a city house typology, its own way of making a facade. In Europe the longevity of
tried to articulate what was the difference between a house and a public building. The
this process means that cities have become important physical repositories of a
city, on the other hand, has been hotly debated by all manner of architects and
place's history, but even more powerfully the city is a manifestation of a particular
urbanists, arguing positions which range from the reconstruction of the European city
to a new fluid functionalism which emerges from global market forces. It is strange
that so much is said and predicted for the future of the city since all evidence suggests
that physical planning plays a barely significant role in the development of cities. The
growing pressures to concentrate use, to assemble ever larger sites, to erode the
concerned that instead of discussing theories of the future city there be a discussion
public realm are driven by economic development, and architects are usually left to
about how the form of the real city has emerged and why, in Europe at least, the city
interpret and facilitate decisions that have been taken at a much earlier stage of the
process, decisions that architects and planners are rarely party to. Cities are in fact
economic change and also resisting being turned into a large open air museum. While
highly resistant to a priori ideologies and instead follow a continuous and barely
one might intuitively be suspicious of the romantic variety and finely grained scale that
now make the historic centres of our cities such popular tourist attractions, this
culture, of peoples ambitions and desires. Thought of this way, rather than being an
imperfect manifestation of an abstract theory, the city is a perfect and vivid instance of
reality. If one accepts that abstract, formal ambitions will almost never play a
society. Hundreds of separate interests fronting onto a single street, all more or less
subscribing to certain rules of engagement and benefiting from a multiplicity of social
and economic transactions. Within obvious limits, all the inhabitants of a street are
can emerge by ignoring the big and the general and work with the minute and the
highly specific. Architecture should be sensitive to those emotional qualities that
Contrast this with land assembly, one of the most direct and destructive
define the city, melancholy, expectancy, pathos, hope. If one accepts that architecture
is about altering and extending what is already there, one can engage the powerful
increase returns on investment year on year means that even profitable properties
presence of the real so that the aura of urbanity is amplified and extended in the place
need to earn more. This can only be achieved by demolishing single buildings and
that one is working. The complexity and interconnectedness of the city is sustained by
erecting ever larger, more efficient ones. When efficiency can no longer be improved,
buildings are still replaced in favour of newer, fresher packages that can tempt tenants
away from buildings that are sometimes themselves only a few years old. This is a
London
London, despite its size, its tradition of compromise and an English cultural
master plan, several city blocks, that once housed thousands of tenants and was in
ambivalence towards urbanity, is a great and moving city. A city so large that there still
exist substantial parts that have resisted the ravages of land speculation and have
financial institutions. Do not be fooled by the medieval street pattern, the well
maintained squares, the lunch time activities, these developments constitute a serious
unitary special interests. It retains a loose, sometimes toothless texture that is still
erosion of democracy and of the public realm. This process is taking place all over
emphatically urban. London is so decentralised that one can live and work within
London and in all major cities. Far from attempting to control this serious threat to the
walking distance in the east end and only visit west London every month or two, for a
reality over abstract theories. The imperfections and incompleteness of its many
utopian fragments (the Georgian city, garden city, ville radieuse, new vernacular) is a
city. The current fashion for discussing the future of cities, and how their structure will
poignant indication of how urbanism follows strong internal forces that are not easily
emerge from the global market and new information technologies is as futile as the
described. The resulting complexity and never-ending potential of the city has little to
modernist discourses of the twentieth century. These ideologies are about shock and
do with novelty and theoretical abstraction but is held within the deeply moving world
novelty, they define themselves in contrast to what exists. They confront the vivid
of things.
plurality of the real city with the deadening unity of an ideal city, an ideal which will
always be insufficient, incomplete and disappointing in the face of an infinitely
complex reality.