Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Well Kill Methods

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Well Kill Methods

There are several well kill methods that well control specialists and operators use
when well control events occur. Each method has its own application, as well as
advantages and disadvantages.
There are basically two categories of well kills used in kill wells. Conventional well
kills are generally used when the well has been shut in, and contained by the
surface pressure control equipment. Unconventional methods are usually employed
when flow from the well is not contained. This can be a surface or an underground
blowout.
Conventional Methods
Conventional methods are those that are traditionally known by most operating
personnel involved in drilling, workover and completion operations. These methods
are:
Drillers Method
Engineer's Method
Concurrent Method
The methods are considered constant bottom hole pressure methods, and all have
the following characteristics:
Each method requires the use of back pressure on the well to control the surface
pressure during the well kill
The calculations required are relatively simple
Circulation is required to implement the kill
A work string is required in the well close to the kick depth
The success of the kill operations with these methods depends on a number of
factors, but as a general rule, if the well can be circulated near the kick depth with
minimal or no loss of circulation, the likelihood of success is high.
Volumetric Well Control and Lubricate and Bleed operations are not generally
considered as well kill methods. These are however, important well control methods
that are routinely used for different operational settings, in conjunction with other
well kill methods.
Volumetric Well Control is used to safely allow a gas bubble to migrate to the
surface. The basic theory of the method is to expand the gas bubble in a controlled
manner as it rises. The amount of the casing pressure rise associated with this is

dependent on the hydrostatic pressure of the fluid bled from the well. This method
has the following characteristics:
Used when pumping is not an option
Basically a constant bottom hole method (within a chosen range)
Requires bleeding fluid from the well in controlled volumes
Measuring the volume of fluid bled from the well is critical
Casing pressure will rise as the volume of the gas bubble increases
Lubricate and bleed operations are basically the inverse of volumetric well control.
Fluid is pumped into the well, and the gas bubble is bled from the well in controlled
increments. Lubricate and bleed operations have the following characteristics:
Gas bubble must be at the top of the well
Basically a constant bottom hole method (within a chosen range)
The volume of fluid pumped into the well must be carefully measured
A accurate casing pressure gauge is required for proper bleeding
Can be used to kill the well in certain situations
As is the case with volumetric control, lubricate and bleed operations are usually
applied in conjunction with other methods, to completely bring the well under full
hydrostatic control.
Unconventional Methods
There are several well kill methods that are used to kill blowouts. These methods
are momentum and dynamic kills.
Momentum and dynamic kills are used on flowing wells, and involve more advanced
calculations, in which most operations personnel have little or no experience. These
situations are usually best handled by experienced and trained personnel.
Momentum Kills
A momentum kill is a collision of the blowout fluids and the kill fluid. The momentum
force of the kill fluid overcomes the momentum force of the blowout fluid and forces
the blowout fluid back down the well to the open formation or perforations.
Momentum kills have the following characteristics.
Can be used in conjunction with controlled back pressure but is not necessary.

Momentum force of the blowout fluids can be difficult to determine. This is


because the density of the blowout fluid is required and is difficult to calculate.
The higher the gas flow rates, the less likely the chance of a successful
momentum kill.
The deeper in the well the fluids collide, the higher the chance of success for a
momentum kill. This requires that a kill string be as close as possible to the bottom
of the well.
Momentum kills have traditionally been called out running the well. These kills
have been tried on numerous blowouts without success. The reason for this is that
the momentum force of gas blowing at the surface is very high, and the required
pump rate for the kill fluid is not achievable with conventional kill equipment
spreads.
Dynamic Kills
Dynamic kills are most often associated with relief well intervention projects but are
routinely employed on direct intervention projects as well. A dynamic kill is usually
done on wells where the surface back pressure cannot be controlled. However,
dynamic kills are also used on underground blowouts where the controlling pressure
is dependent on the fracture pressure of the formation that is taking the flow.
The requirement for a dynamic kill to be successful is, that the hydrostatic pressure
of the mixture density of the kill and blowout fluids, combined with the friction
pressure of the mixture is greater than the flowing bottom hole pressure of the
formation that is flowing.
The calculations required to determine these pressures include:
Blowout flow rate determination of the gas and fluids
Blowout gas density
Flowing bottom hole pressure of the blowout formation
Mixture density of kill and blowout fluids at the dynamic kill rate
Friction pressure of the kill fluid/blowout fluid mixture
These calculations can be tedious and complicated, and are usually done with
computer programs of varying sophistication. These include steady state and
transient models. Steady state models are usually sufficient for most kill scenarios,
but transient models are usually recommended for high flow rate blowouts.

You might also like