Mildred Salvatierra y Matuco was charged with illegal recruitment in large scale and estafa. She represented herself as being able to deploy workers to South Korea for a fee. Several victims paid her money but she failed to deploy them and stopped communicating. An entrapment operation was conducted where she accepted marked money. She was found guilty by the trial court and appellate court of illegal recruitment and estafa. The Supreme Court upheld the conviction, finding that she recruited workers without a license and defrauded victims through deceit.
Mildred Salvatierra y Matuco was charged with illegal recruitment in large scale and estafa. She represented herself as being able to deploy workers to South Korea for a fee. Several victims paid her money but she failed to deploy them and stopped communicating. An entrapment operation was conducted where she accepted marked money. She was found guilty by the trial court and appellate court of illegal recruitment and estafa. The Supreme Court upheld the conviction, finding that she recruited workers without a license and defrauded victims through deceit.
Mildred Salvatierra y Matuco was charged with illegal recruitment in large scale and estafa. She represented herself as being able to deploy workers to South Korea for a fee. Several victims paid her money but she failed to deploy them and stopped communicating. An entrapment operation was conducted where she accepted marked money. She was found guilty by the trial court and appellate court of illegal recruitment and estafa. The Supreme Court upheld the conviction, finding that she recruited workers without a license and defrauded victims through deceit.
Mildred Salvatierra y Matuco was charged with illegal recruitment in large scale and estafa. She represented herself as being able to deploy workers to South Korea for a fee. Several victims paid her money but she failed to deploy them and stopped communicating. An entrapment operation was conducted where she accepted marked money. She was found guilty by the trial court and appellate court of illegal recruitment and estafa. The Supreme Court upheld the conviction, finding that she recruited workers without a license and defrauded victims through deceit.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
Republic of the Philippines vs.
Mildred Salvatierra y Matuco
G.R. No. : 200884. June 4, 2014 Ponente : Diosdado M. Peralta Subject : LABOR LAW (Illegal recruitment) CRIMINAL LAW (Estafa) FACTS: Appellant Mildred M. Salvatierra was charged of Illegal Recruitment in Large Scale and Estafa. On different occasions, appellant represented herself to be capable of deploying workers for a fee to South Korea. Believing on such representation, the victims parted with their money and waited for appelants instructions. Upon receipt of the initial payments made by the victims, appellant issued either receipts or petty cash vouchers. Afterwhich, appellant stopped seeing them and failed to deploy them. Upon demanding additional placement fee, the victims went to the NBI to complain and an entrapment operation ensued. Upon her arrest, the NBI agents took from her the marked money. She was, likewise, found positive for yellow fluorescent smudges. RTC rendered a decision finding the appellant guilty of Illegal recruitment or a Violation of The Migrant Workers and Overseas Filipinos Act and Estafa. CA affirmed the RTC decision with modification by increasing the fine imposed on the illegal recruitment case. Hence this petition. ISSUE: Whether or not Appellant is guilty of Illegal recruitment and Estafa. HELD: Clearly, we find no reason to disturb the RTCs findings as affirmed by the CA, that appellant committed the crime of illegal recruitment in large scale.
In this case, appellant engaged in
recruitment when she represented herself to be capable of deploying workers to South Korea upon submission of the pertinent documents and payment of the required fees. As appellant claimed to be the liaison officer of Llanesa Consultancy Services, the victims believed that she indeed had the capability to deploy them abroad. All the witnesses and the supposed victims identified appellant as the one who made such representation and received the payments they made evidenced by the petty cash vouchers and receipts she signed. Moreover, appellant was caught in an entrapment operation when she received the amount demanded allegedly as additional requirement before they can be deployed abroad. It was, likewise, certified to by the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration Licensing Division that neither appellant nor Llanesa Consultancy Services were licensed to recruit workers for overseas employment. It is also clear from the evidence presented that the crime of illegal recruitment was committed by appellant against five persons.
Crime of Illegal Recruitment
Elements: (1) the offender undertakes any of the activities within the meaning of recruitment and placement under Section 6 of RA 8042 and (2) the offender has no valid license or authority required by law to enable him to lawfully engage in recruitment and placement of workers. In the case of illegal recruitment in large scale, a third element is added: that the offender commits any
of the acts of recruitment and
placement against three or more persons, individually or as a group. The elements of estafa are: (a) that the accused defrauded another by abuse of confidence
or by means of deceit, and (b)
that damage or prejudice capable of pecuniary estimation is caused to the offended party or third person. Digested by: Jacqueline A. Llabado April 14, 2015