Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Quantitative Research Methods

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 23

Quantitative Research Methods

FSEHS-ARC

Overview
Research Process
Quantitative Methods
Designs
Validity and Research Designs

A Definition of Research
Research is a process of steps used to
collect and analyze information in order to
increase our understanding of a topic or
issue.

Problems With Research Today


Contradictory or vague findings
Questionable data
Unclear statements about the intent of
the study
Lack of full disclosure of the datacollection procedure
Inarticulate rendering of the research
problem

The Process of Research


Identify the
Research Problem
Report
and
Evaluate Research

Review the
Literature

Analyze and
Interpret
Data
Collect Data

Specify a
Research
Purpose

The Process of Research:


Identify the Research Problem
Specify a problem
Justify a problem

Suggest a need to study the problem for


audiences

The Process of Research:


Review the Literature
Locate resources
Books
Journals
Electronic resources

Select resources
Determine the relevant resources for the
topic
Organize the resources by developing a
Literature Map

Summarize the resources in a literature


review

The Process of Research:


Specify a Research Purpose
Identify the purpose statement
The major intent of the study
The participants in the study
The site of the study

Narrow the purpose statement


Quantitative: Write research
questions and/or hypothesis
Qualitative: Identify a central
phenomenon and write
subquestions

The Research Process:


Collect Data
Determine the data-collection method
Select the individuals to study
Design or select data-collection
instruments and outline data-collection
procedures

Obtain permissions
Gather data

The Research Process:


Analyze and Interpret Data
Take the data apart to look at individual
responses
Represent the data in tables, figures, and
pictures

Explain conclusions from the data that


address the research questions

Ethical Considerations in Research


Respect the rights of the participants
Honor the requests and restrictions of the
research site
Report the research fully and honestly

Definitions of Quantitative and


Qualitative Research
Quantitative Research
A type of educational research in which the researcher
decides what to study; asks specific, narrow questions;
collects quantifiable data from participants; analyzes these
numbers using statistics; and conducts the inquiry in an
unbiased, objective manner.

Characteristics of Quantitative
Research
An emphasis on collecting and analyzing
information in the form of numbers
An emphasis on collecting scores that
measure distinct attributes of individuals
and organizations
An emphasis on the procedures of
comparing groups or relating factors about
individuals or groups in experiments,
correlational studies, and surveys

Characteristics of Quantitative Methods


in the Process of Research
Quantitative
Characteristics
Descriptive/Explanatory
Role
Justify Problem

Steps in the Research


Process

Identify a Problem

Major

and Narrow
Measurable/Observable

Review the Literature

Specific

Specify a Purpose

Predetermined

Instruments
Numeric Data
Large Numbers
Statistical
Description

of Trends
Comparisons/Predictions
Standard

and Fixed
Objective and Unbiased

Collect Data

Analyze and Interpret Data

Report and Evaluate

Quantitative Methods
Nonintervention
Research

Intervention
Research
Explaining whether an
intervention influences
an outcome for one
group as opposed to
another group

Experimental Research:
Between-Subjects
Approach

Associating or
relating variables
in a predictable
pattern for one
group of
individuals

Describing trends for


the population of
people

Nonexperimental
Research:
Survey Approach
Nonexperimental
Research:
Correlational Approach

Method, Research, Approach and Design


(Edmonds & Kennedy, 2012)

Level
METHOD1

Explanation
The method is the theoretical, philosophical, and data analytic perspective. The method
can be quantitative, qualitative, or mixed (e.g., a quantitative method1).

RESEARCH2

Research refers to the systematic process of group assignment, selection, and data
collection techniques. Research can be experimental, quasi-experimental, or nonexperimental (e.g., a quantitative method1 and experimental research2).

APPROACH3

The approach is the first step to creating structure to the design, and it details (a) a
theoretical model of how the data will be collected, and (b) if one case, one group, or
multiple groups will be associated with the process (e.g., a quantitative method1,
experimental research2 with a between-subjects approach3).

DESIGN4

The design is the actual structure or framework that indicates (a) the time frame(s) in
which data will be collected or how and when the data will be analyzed using qualitative
methods, (b) when the treatment will be implemented (or not), and (c) the exact number
of groups that will be involved (e.g., a quantitative method1, experimental research2 with a
between-subjects approach3 and a pre- and posttest control group design4).

Edmonds, W. A., & Kennedy, T. D. (2012). An applied reference guide to research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed
methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Experimental research utilizing a betweensubjects approach with a pre- and posttest


control group design
Research Question: Does active parent engagement in selecting and
using routine-based activities have a positive effect on children's language
and appropriate behavior development?
Assignment

Group

Pretest

Treatment

Posttest

1 (n = 22)

TELD-3, ECBI

Family-Centered
Intervention

TELD-3, ECBI

2 (n = 19)

TELD-3, ECBI

TELD-3, ECBI

Time

Chao, P., Bryan, T., Burstein, K., & Ergul, C. (2006). Family-centered intervention for young
children at-risk for language and behavior problems. Early Childhood Education Journal,
34(2), 147-153.

Nonexperimental research utilizing a


correlational approach with an explanatory design
Research Question: What classroom motivation

variables are related to students sense of


belonging?
Variables

Students (n = 249)

Motivation

Self, efficacy, instrumentality,


goals

Sense of belonging

Sense of belonging survey

Walker, C. O., & Greene, B. A. (2009). The relations between students motivational beliefs
and cognitive engagement in high school. Journal of Educational Research, 102(6) 463-471.

Nonexperimental research utilizing a survey


approach with a cross-sectional design
Research Question: What evidence exists to
demonstrate the prevalence and consequences of
recurrent low-back pain in children?
Variable (N = 500)

Time point 1

Low-back pain

Low-back pain
survey

Jones, M. A., Stratten, G., Reilly, T., & Unnithan, V. B. (2004). A school-based survey of
recurrent non-specific low-back pain prevalence and consequences in children. Health
Education Research, 19(3), 284-289.

Threats to Internal Validity (examples)


Threat

History

Maturation

Testing

Instrumentation

Explanation
Any event that occurs during the time of the treatment
and the posttest that could affect the outcome (e.g.,
natural life events such as a death in the family, change in
job, or moving).
The natural process of changing, growing, and learning
over time.

The effects of practice familiarity in taking the same test


more than once (e.g., the participant who takes the same
math achievement test twice in the pre- and posttest
measures may improve performance simply because of the
familiarity with the test)
The change in a measuring instrument over time (i.e.,
some instruments undergo revisions).

Edmonds, W. A., & Kennedy, T. D. (2010). A reference guide to basic research design for education and the social and behavioral
sciences. New York, NY: Pearson.

Threats to External Validity (examples)


Threat

Explanation

Sample
Characteristics

The extent to which the sample (i.e., unit) represents the


population from which it is drawn (i.e., for a sample to represent a
population, the researcher must employ the appropriate sampling
procedures and perform random selection).

Stimulus
Characteristics
and Settings

The unique factors involved in providing the treatment or


intervention, such as the setting and researchers (i.e., it is difficult
to replicate contrived laboratory conditions to real-life scenarios).

Treatment
Variations

Variations in the same treatment or the combination of multiple or


partial treatments account for different results.

Outcome
Variations

Observing the effect of one type of outcome differs when alternate


outcomes are observed.

ContextDependent
Mediation

Mediating variables related to outcomes differ between contexts or


settings.

Edmonds, W. A., & Kennedy, T. D. (2010). A reference guide to basic research design for education and the
social and behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Pearson.

Threats to Construct Validity (examples)


Threat

Explanation

Similar to special treatment, the level of attention, or


differentiated attention, between the groups from the
Attention and
experimenter (e.g., the researcher spends more time with Group 1
Contact with
than Group 2, and the differences observed in the outcome can be
Participants
explained by the increased amount of attention and not due to
the intervention).
Single
The impact the researcher has on the development and
Operations and
implementation of the treatment (i.e., researchers deliver
Narrow
treatments differently based on experiences and expertise;
Stimulus
therefore, it is difficult to measure the impact the researcher has
Sampling
on the treatment itself).
The researchers expectancies, beliefs, and biases about the
results (e.g., if a researcher strongly believes anxiety reduces test
Experimenter
performance, then the interaction between the researcher and
Expectancies
the participant may influence the outcome because the delivery
of instructions and adherence to protocols may change).
Edmonds, W. A., & Kennedy, T. D. (2010). A reference guide to basic research design for education and the social
and behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Pearson.

Threats to Statistical Conclusion Validity


(examples)
Threat

Explanation

Power is the extent to which the results of an analysis


Low Statistical
accurately reveal a statistically significant difference
Power
between groups (or cases) when a statistical difference
truly exists.
Assumption
Violating the assumptions (depending on the extent of the
Violation of
violation) of statistical tests can lead to over- or
Statistical
underestimation of practical and statistical significance of
Tests
an outcome.
Statistical significance can be artificially inflated when
Error Rate
performing multiple pairwise tests, also referred to as
Problem
familywise error rate. (i.e., the probability of making a Type
I error when performing multiple pairwise analyses).
Restriction of
Lack of variability between variables weakens the
Range
relationship and lowers statistical power.
Edmonds, W. A., & Kennedy, T. D. (2010). A reference guide to basic research design for education and the social and
behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Pearson.

You might also like