ENG 426: Morphology by Ammar Anas
ENG 426: Morphology by Ammar Anas
ENG 426: Morphology by Ammar Anas
words are not to be regarded as merely sequences of syllables. The concept of the word is a grammatical
concept; in speech, words are not separated by pauses, but they are recognized as recurrent units that make up
sentences. Very generally, grammar is concerned with the relations between words in sentences. Classes of
words, or parts of speech, as they are often called, are distinguished because they occupy different places in
sentence structure, and in most languages some of them appear in different forms according to their function
(English man, men; walk, walked; I, me; and so on).
(Source: http://global.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/329791/language/27160/Grammar#ref665936)
In linguistics, a word is the smallest element that may be uttered in isolation with semantic or pragmatic content
(with literal or practical meaning). This contrasts with a morpheme, which is the smallest unit of meaning but
will not necessarily stand on its own. A word may consist of a single morpheme (for example: oh!, rock, red,
quick, run, expect), or several (rocks, redness, quickly, running, unexpected), whereas a morpheme may not be
able to stand on its own as a word (in the words just mentioned, these are -s, -ness, -ly, -ing, un-, -ed). A
complex word will typically include a root and one or more affixes (rock-s, red-ness, quick-ly, run-ning, unexpect-ed), or more than one root in a compound (black-board, rat-race). Words can be put together to build
larger elements of language, such as phrases (a red rock), clauses (I threw a rock), and sentences (He threw a
rock too but he missed).
(Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Word#Definitions)
Most of the above definitions of the word characterize two following characteristics:
(1) they have meanings that are unpredictable and so must be listed in dictionaries,
(2) They are the building-blocks for words and phrases.
Although this is broadly true, but the two characteristics do not always go together.
For example, the relationship between a word and its meaning is purely based on convention. Native speakers
develop ability to understand new words by looking into identifiable parts for example dioecious is
completely a new word and a native speaker can predict the meaning of dioeciously as the suffix -ly has
adjective meaning of dioecious. Dictionary will not need to include dioeciously in dictionary. Word such as
un-Clintonish and de-Yeltsinises are other examples which have predictable meaning for a native speakers and
do not need to include in the dictionary. The point is that association of meaning to be a word is not always
applicable. It does not mean the association of meaning to a word is wrong. It does not mean that the common
view of words as basic semantic building blocks of language is simply wrong because in some instances a
words original motivation is totally obscured by its pronunciation but can still be glimpsed from its spelling, as
with cupboard and handkerchief. It shows that words are intrinsically prone to drift semantically, and in
particular to acquire meanings that are more specialised than one would predict if one had never encountered
them before.
Another point is that Idioms, collocations and proverb are composed of two or more words and despite that they
have meaning, their meaning cannot be predicted from the words it is composed of. For example:
(1) The interrogation took a long time because the suspect kept introducing red herrings.
(red herring is an idiom meaning irrelevant argument,)
(2) white wine, white coffee, white noise and white man
(3) Too many cooks spoil the broth. A stitch in time saves nine.
Due to this reason, those items which have meanings that are unpredictable and need to be included in
dictionaries are called Lexical item. Those items which are building-blocks for words and phrases are
characterized as word.