Teaching Poetry Linguistically
Teaching Poetry Linguistically
Teaching Poetry Linguistically
Poetry can offer a wide range of language learning opportunities to ESL learners if its taught
interactively and linguistically. Poetry is embellished with rhythm, beautiful diction and elevated
grammatical features. These features can serve as a powerful stimulus to ESL students in
learning grammar, vocabulary and integrated language skills. Some of the researchers pointed
out that Poetry was taught in literature class but it was predominantly a teacher centered and
nothing more than a dramatic monologue, so it failed to improve students language skills and
creative analysis. The present study aims to explore how stylistics approach can be used as a
powerful teaching resource to enrich grammar, vocabulary and integrated language skills of ESL
learners. Four statistical surveys were conducted such as to elicit the impression of teachers and
the impression & performance of students at HSSC level. Statements pertinent to different
aspects of poetry were used for major data collection. The findings marked a significant
difference between the performance of stylistics based learners and traditional based learners in
vocabulary, grammar, pronunciation and integrated language skills. Unlike traditional method,
the stylistics approach for teaching poetry was found very exciting, because it was learners
centered and based on collection of interactive language exercises. As per the findings of the four
surveys conducted in this study, the stylistics approach for teaching poetry in ESL classroom was
perceived by both teachers and students as an enjoyable means to enrich and energize the
learning environment of an ESL classroom.
Keywords
Poetry, motivation, resource, language skills, literary expression, rhythmic tone 1
Introduction
The present study aims to explore how various tools of linguistic analysis can be used to teach
poetry to ESL learners in order to improve their proficiency in grammar, vocabulary, accent,
intonation and integrated language skills. The chunks of language used in poetry are full of
emotional and linguistic melody. They can give readers not only a strong feel about language but
can also serve as a rich linguistic tool to improve language skills such as listening, speaking,
reading and writing. Poetry has musical effect, so it can provide motivational buzz to classroom
activity. Learners can acquire correct pronunciation, intonation and rhyming patterns by listening
to poems either on YouTube or read by the competent and well trained teachers of English.
Poetry can add vigor to the process of learning new thoughts and beautiful diction, because the
poet deliberately chooses words and their sound effects while composing poetry such as The
furrow followed free and We were the first that ever burst into that silent sea are examples of
careful choice of words and their profound effect on readers. These poetic words create a charm
of their own. The learners can really enjoy the linguistic beauty of these sentences. In the double
beat of thundering one can easily see why these words and these words only were chosen and
arranged in that order. The poet communicates from heart to heart by figurative and poetic
expression. Was there a second Troy for her to burn? is an example of the classic symbol of
Troy being used for a particular effect. While teaching poetry teachers can make students realize
the value of linguistic devices that a poet uses. Poetry can nurture in learners robust sensibility
and strong feel about choice of words, syntactical formulation, rhetorical and aesthetic beauty of
language. It makes learners learn beautiful similes, metaphors and paradox that express unique
thoughts and emotions of a poet. So by reading poetry learners can rejoice in intrinsic beauty of
poetic words, their sound, meanings and their profound poetic effect. They not only learn
symbolic and literary language used in the poem but they also feel inspired to add the same
literary and rhetorical flavor in their own writing. Most of the tried and tested activities such as
listening, speaking, reading, writing, vocabulary and grammar can also be effectively taught by
introducing stylistics based instructional approach to poetry. Textual or stylistics based approach
means close reading of the poem without any biographical and sociological details about the
poet. The major focus is on the poem itself which means discussion on key individual words and
beautiful structure prior to reading of poetry. Such a deep textual analysis propounded by
Cleanth Brooks will open a fresh perspective on new ideas and language and sensitizes students
to unusual and interesting lexical and syntactical components of poetic language. Stylistics
approach for teaching poetry will encourage students to learn syntactic, semantic, rhythmic and
lexical components.
o 1.1 Literature Review
Lots of profound researches done earlier consolidated the hypothesis of the present study. The
researchers were of the view that meaningful learning of language skills would take place if
poetry was chosen carefully and taught properly in ESL classroom. According to Maley and Duff
(1989) poetry offers a rich resource for language learning. A poem offers a readymade semantic
field for learners to enter. Benton, M., & Fox, G. (1987) affirmed the main objective of using
poetry in language lessons is to find a means of involving the learners in using their language
skills in an active and creative way and thus to contribute to the development of their
communicative competence. Moore, (2002) was of the view that in-depth reading and close
analysis of text in pairs or other small groupings, can make poetry an integral part of the EFL
classroom. As with other poetic forms, pattern poems can promote a number of positive
learning functions (Holmes & Moulton, 2001). According to Spillett, Andrea (2008) an ESL
teacher who blogs for Scholastic, describes a program in which students presented poems from
Chicken Soup with Rice by Maurice Sendak, to their parents. Rebecca Scudder, (2012) an ESL
teacher recommended using poetry with predictable language patterns, repeated words, phrases,
lines, and identifiable rhymes so that they are easier for students to read. McCarthy, Carol
(2009) offered a number of ideas for guiding students in their exploration of poetry from their
own cultures. According to Hughes, (2007) poetry offers wonderful opportunities for reading,
writing, speaking, and listening practice for ELLs. Poetry also gives students a chance to
expand vocabulary knowledge, to play with language, and to work with different rhythms.
According to Vincent (1979) traditional method for teaching poetry was an impressionistic and
teacher centered and never favors stylistics model of teaching poetry. Inyang, G. B. (2009) was
also against traditional method of teaching poetry and endorsed stylistics based teaching method.
According to him traditional teacher dazzled the innocent students with his erudition on the
sociology of the poem and figures of speech. According to Dagoli (2000) traditional method
does not promote learning skills because traditional method was a teacher-centered where
learners learned by rote memory, concepts and principles. An integrated and communicative
teaching approach incorporating a set of text-based, student-centered activities which, as Collie
and Slater (1987) suggest, add fresh momentum into the teaching of literature by stimulating
students desire to read and reflect their experiences. Samuel Taylor Coleridges notion about
poetry as something like the best words in the best order substantiates the point that poetry can
give a strong feel about language. The aforesaid views of researchers discarded traditional
method of teaching poetry but substantiated the idea of introducing stylistics based approach for
teaching poetry in ESL classroom. While reviewing a number of surveys dealing with the use of
poetry in EFL/ESL situations, some adverse impressions that students expressed towards
learning poetry were also found. Hirvela and Boyle (1988) reported only 6% of the Hong Kong
Chinese students who were involved in the survey favored poetry more than other literary genres
and 73% of them found poetry the most difficult and intimidating literary form. American
structural linguist, Spack, (1985) argued that literature should be excluded from the ESL
curriculum because of its structural complexity, lack of conformity to standard grammatical rules
and remote cultural perspectives. All these negative attitudes emerged out of teachers own
deeply wrought unhappiness with verse and their traditional teaching methodology such as
lecturing and paraphrasing. Brumfit and Carter (1986), Duff and Maley (1989), Lazar (1993),
Parkinson and Reid Thomas (2000) Concluded that the major reasons of students failure in
understanding and appreciating English poetry are either an inappropriate selection of texts or
ineffective teaching methodology. Khatib (2011) also pointed out that poetry failed due to
inappropriate selection of the texts and ineffective teaching methodology. According to Arthur
(1968) students show their aversion to literature because teachers ignore students response and
their private exchange with the literary text. He further pointed out that if literature is to become
a successful part of an ESL programme, ways must be found to make literature both useful and
enjoyable. All the previous researchers illustrated the fact that traditional method of teaching
poetry failed to produce desired results. The teachers of traditional methods used to explain just
the theme of the poem and the sociological information about the poet. The stylistics based and
communicative based approaches had never been taken into account while teaching poetry.
Traditional method never aimed to improve learners vocabulary, grammar pronunciation and
integrated language skills such as listening, speaking, reading and writing skills.
o 1.2 Research Hypothesis
The research hypotheses formulated about the current research are as follows:
(1) Poetry if chosen carefully may be an immense source of motivation for ESL learners.
(2) Using poetry to teach English will increase learners exciting learning experience.
(3) Teaching of poetry with linguistic devices and communicative approach will be extremely
exciting for both teachers and the students.
(4) Carefully chosen poems may provide deep insight into literary expression.
(5) Learners efforts to analyze poems will increase their creative talents.
(6) There will be a significant difference between the performance of traditional learners and
Stylistics based learners in learning accent, grammar, vocabulary and integrated language skills.
2. Methods
Four surveys were conducted to explore how far the stylistics approach would be effective in
learning, pronunciation, grammar, vocabulary and integrated language skills. First and foremost
a Shakespearean sonnet Shall I compare thee to a summers day? was selected. Then a
stylistics based model was built on repertoire of language exercises such as listening, speaking,
reading, writing, grammar and vocabulary.(Pls. refer to model in appendix). This model was
introduced to 25 teachers who were teaching English literature and linguistics in different
schools , colleges and coaching centers. The model was explained to the teachers and the
teachers were asked to use the same model in their ESL classes. Five statements about poetry
were prepared to elicit the impression of the teachers after they experimented the given model in
ESL classes .The teachers were asked to check Agree, Disagree, I cant say, against the above
mentioned five statements.(Pls. refer to Fig.1)
The purpose of the second survey was to determine the relative effectiveness of traditional
method (Group A) and stylistics based approach (Group B) for teaching poetry in learning
pronunciation. 50 students (25 for each group) from schools and colleges were selected for this
experiment. Under traditional method teachers just explained and paraphrased the background
information and the theme of the poem. On the contrary, stylistics based model was used. This
model incorporated observation, marking difference, drill practice and individual practice
followed by evaluation. Through this model the teachers were first assigned to listen and observe
how well the students were able to produce accurate accent, intonation and rhythm of the poem.
Afterwards the students were asked to listen to the poem either on YouTube or read by the
competent teacher of English, so that they could explore their own levels of performance in
pronunciation. While performing drill the students were asked to read the poem first in chorus
and then individually for ten minutes. After one week a similar test was given to both the groups
to evaluate the performance of each student of both groups. Each student of both groups was
asked to read the poem aloud with good accentual and intonation patterns. This test was aimed
just to explore the effectiveness of linguistic based approach in learning correct pronunciation
and rhythm of the poem. (Pls. refer to fig2)
The third survey was aimed to investigate the performance of both the groups in learning
grammar, vocabulary and speaking and writing skills. The stylistics based approach included
vocabulary exercises based on matching words with meaning. It was aimed to sharpen students
ability to guess the meaning through context. Grammar exercise was based on the formation of
comparative adjectives and formation of nouns. This grammar exercise was relevant to the
understanding of the poem. The test of Speaking skill was based on Group Discussion about the
theme, form, style, similes, metaphors and rhyming scheme of the poem. The students
participated in the group discussion. This was a golden opportunity for the students to speak
without hesitation and to improve their speaking skill. The test for writing skill was focused on
writing small sentences concerning different aspects of the poem such as theme, figure of speech,
similes, metaphors and rhythm of the poem. After one week similar stylistics based test was
given to the students of both the groups. The time given was one hour and the correct answer to
each item received one point. There was no penalty for false responses. The students of both
groups were initially told that they would take part in listening, speaking, reading, writing, and
vocabulary and grammar activities.
The fourth survey was carried to explore what the students of stylistics based group really
thought about different aspects of poetry. It was necessary to elicit students attitude towards
poetry after they experienced stylistics based model for teaching poetry. To find out whether the
learners really enjoyed this stylistics based approach was the major thrust of this survey. This
was the first time the students were exposed to English poetry with such an effective model in
ESL classroom. In this survey the students were asked to check Agree, Strongly agree and
Disagree against four statements on different aspects of poetry.
Agree
Disagree
I cant say
90%
5%
5%
95%
0%
5%
90%
5%
5%
80%
5%
15%
90%
5%
5%
The first survey in Figure 1 was conducted on teachers who were teaching English to secondary
and intermediate level students. First the teachers were introduced to the stylistics based model
for teaching poetry in ESL class. The teachers experimented this model in their ESL classes and
later on gave their responses to different statements pertinent to the use of poetry in ESL classes.
The overwhelming majority of the teachers found this stylistics based model for teaching poetry
very exciting and productive. In response to the first statement 90% teachers agreed that poetry if
chosen carefully would be an immense source of motivation. They opined that poetry containing
current theme with rich linguistic elements would really give pleasure and inspire learners. This
was a new idea to use stylistics approach for teaching poetry said one of the teachers. Poetry
which was just explained to me by the teacher when I was a student 10 years ago was very
boring said another elderly teacher. One British teacher expressed that using linguistic tools for
teaching poetry will equip learners with language skills. In response to the second statement 95%
teachers were of the view that poetry would provide learners with exciting learning experience.
In response to the third statement 90% teachers agreed that teaching of poetry based on language
activities would improve language skills. The model for teaching poetry which was provided to
the teachers was skills oriented. So the teachers while applying the same model in the classroom
perceived that model as an important resource for teaching language skills. In response to the
fourth statement 80% teachers strongly supported the idea that carefully chosen poems might
provide deep insight into literary expression. In response to the fifth statement 90 % learners
agreed that the learners efforts to analyze the poem linguistically would increase their creative
potential. Linguistic based method for teaching poetry was hailed as an important pedagogical
tool in such a country like Saudi Arabia where poetry has never been tried and incorporated in
ESL curriculum. The majority of the teachers agreed that stylistics approach for teaching poetry
would not only improve language skills but it would inspire learners immensely. The second
survey was conducted to ascertain the performance of the students of both groups in accent,
intonation and pronunciation. The aim was to evaluate learners ability to read the poem with
accurate accentual and intonation patterns.
The Figure 2 investigated the performances of both groups. The performance of the students of
traditional approach was very poor. The majority of the students were unable to read the poem
with proper accentual and intonation patterns. None of the students of traditional approach were
100% correct in pronunciation. The performance of only 10% students was 60% correct. The
performance of just 30% students of this group went up to just 40%. So overall performance of
the students of traditional approach was below the average. On the contrary the performance of
the students of stylistics approach improved. In stylistics approach the improvement was possible
after the students listened to their teachers when they were reading the poem aloud with correct
accent, intonation and rhythm. At this point the teacher explained the accentual patterns of
difficult words, intonation and rhythm of the poem. Traditional learners were given no
opportunity to practice pronunciation, so they pronounced wrongly the following words:(1)
winds /wnds/ (2) bds /bds/ (3) lease /liz/ (4) brag /bre/ (5) breathe/bri / (6) breath / bri /
(7) May /ma/ (8) possession /pezez()n/ (9) all /a l/ (10) compare / kmpe(r)/ (11)
temperate /temp()rt/ (12) short /a(r)t/ (13) haven /hv()n/. Traditional learners didnt have
any idea about how to pronounce a plural like winds and buds. They pronounce /s/ sound instead
of /z/. As per rule /s/ is pronounced /z/ when it comes after voiced sound like /d/. On the contrary
the learners of stylistics approach pronounced nearly all the aforesaid words correctly. Since they
were given opportunity to listen to the teachers when they were reading the poem with correct
pronunciation. They pronounce the words with proper stress and knew well how to pronounce a
plural which ends with voiced sound. For example (1) winds/windz/ (2) buds/b dz/ (3) lease
/lis/ (4) brag /br/(5) breathe /bri/ (6) breath /bre/ (7) May /me / ( 8) possession /p ze ()n/
(9) all /l/(10) compare /kmpe(r)/ (11) temperate /temp()rt/ (12) short /(r)t/ (13)
heaven /hev()n/.
The students of Stylistics approach also practiced reading through drill patterns. As a result 10%
students were found 100% correct while reading the poem correctly. 20% students obtained 90%
of marks and another 20% students obtained 80% marks. 30% students of Stylistics approach
obtained 70% marks. None of the students of this group obtained less than 50% marks .Whereas
none of the students of traditional approach had obtained more than 60 % marks. Based on the
performance of the students of Stylistics Approach it can be deduced that Stylistics approach for
teaching poetry was quite successful. Reading a text properly was a big challenge for Saudi
students, because they started learning English at the later age. With Stylistics approach the
students were asked to repeat the words chorally and individually. So through group drill
exercise the students of S-approach were able to read the poem with more accuracy.
The third survey was designed to measure the efficiency of the students of both groups in
grammar, vocabulary, speaking and writing.
Figure 3 illustrated the relative performance of both groups. The Stylistics approach motivated
the students to analyze the poem with linguistic tools. This was a holistic approach which helped
learners learn vocabulary, grammar and integrated language skills. They actively participated in
learning language skills through language activities. The performance of the students of Stylistics
model was found remarkably better than those of traditional approach. 95 % students of
Stylistics approach made correct responses in grammar. Not only in grammar but in vocabulary
90% students made correct responses. In speaking skill the performance of S-approach was
found outstanding. 90 % students of this group communicated their answer properly. In writing
skill also 90% students of Stylistics approach were able to produce grammatically correct
sentences. Whereas the score of the students of traditional group was found dreadfully bad, their
performance wasnt satisfactory. Only 60% students of traditional approach made correct
responses in grammar and vocabulary. The performance of only 40% students of T-Approach
was found satisfactory in speaking and only 30% in writing skill. A significant difference was
found between the performances of both groups. This survey was also an eye opener. The
performance of students of T-approach in speaking and writing skills was poor but the students
of S-approach significantly improved. Traditional approach for teaching poetry didnt encourage
students to build up the habit for speaking and writing skills. Saudi students started learning
English at the later stage. They found speaking and writing very difficult. So traditional approach
for teaching poetry didnt break much ice. But the application of Stylistics approach for teaching
poetry was found better in improving learners accent, vocabulary, grammar and integrated
language skills. The interpretation of any poem depends on readers own perception. Its possible
that the poem means different to different people. But one thing really seems true that poetry
gives food for new thoughts. Its difficult to find what exactly happened to poets mind but it
isnt impossible to explore the possible meaning of poem through linguistic analysis. When the
sonnet Shall I compare thee to a summers day? was introduced to the students, they read it
and posed many thematic and conceptual questions.
For example :
(i) Why does the poet compare his friend with summers day?
(ii) How does the poet make his friend eternal?
(iii) Does the poet glorify his own verse?
(iv) What grammatical and lexical devices the poet has used in his poem to convey his
message strongly?
These questions encouraged ESL learners to make deeper stylistics analysis of the poem. On the
basis of this analysis the students came to know that the poet had used interrogative form as one
of the rhetorical devices such as Shall I compare thee to a summers day? in the first line. The
poet appreciated moderate trait of his friend and wanted to convey that summers day might be
excessively hot or humid but his friend is consistently balanced. Students appreciated such a nice
poetic diction that expressed a unique style of appreciating beauty. Four meanings of the word
lease were derived from dictionary, such as
(i) A contract by which property is conveyed to a person for a specified period, usually for rent.
(ii) The instrument by which such property is conveyed.
(iii) Duration or the period of time for which it is conveyed.
(iv) A prospect of renewed health, happiness, etc. a new lease of life.
The students considered duration or the period of time the most befitting meaning of the word
lease. Such lexical analysis was enjoyed by the whole class. The poet further says that for every
beautiful person or thing, there is a certain time at which it loses its beauty but his friends beauty
will be eternal in his verse. The ESL learners found the last two lines the most beautiful
expression that glorifies both the poets love and his verse.
Strongly Agree
90%
Disagree
5%
learning.
Teaching
85%
5%
90%
5%
95%
5%
poetry
with
linguistics
inputs 10%
The result of Figure 4 was found very interesting and encouraging. The overwhelming majority
of the students strongly agreed that poetry could be used for teaching integrated language skills.
In response to the first statement 90 % students agreed that poetry with musical tone creates
enough excitement for learning. In response to the second statement, 85% students strongly
supported the idea that teaching of poetry with linguistic inputs would encourage learners to
learn not only the theme of the poem but vocabulary and grammar as well. In response to the
third statement 90 % students strongly supported open discussion on various intrinsic beauty of
the poem. 95 % students found writing small sentences on theme, form, style, similes and
metaphors very exciting and productive.
4. Conclusion
The four surveys conducted in this study revealed that the stylistics approach for teaching poetry
which was based on a wide variety of linguistic activities was found very useful for both teachers
and students of Saudi universities. This model unlike paraphrasing poem was learners centered.
Learners were encouraged to analyze the poem linguistically such as grammatical features,
lexical features, phonological features, and graphological features .This model created enough
motivation and opportunity for learners to delve deep in learning process. To promote learners
centered instruction, such a thought provoking, enjoyable and meaningful language activities
were planned. The surveys proved that stylistics approach for teaching poetry will be an
important resource for teaching integrated language skills. Students developed a favorable
response to poetry by practicing linguistic exercises on grammar, vocabulary, reading, writing
and speaking activities. 95 % students strongly supported stylistics model for teaching poetry in
ESL classes, because this was found learners centered and skills oriented. The learners became
active participants expressing their own views, writing small sentences and doing language
exercises. This new approach to teaching poetry yielded significantly better results in motivating
the students to read the poem meticulously and improve language skills. The performance of
90% students of Stylistics approach was found better and satisfactory in grammar, vocabulary,
speaking and writing skills. In fact they were given ample chance to improve their skills.
Whereas the score of the students of traditional group needs special attention. Their performance
wasnt satisfactory. Only 60% students of traditional approach made correct responses in
grammar and vocabulary. The performance of only 40% students of T-Approach was found
satisfactory in speaking and only 30% in writing skill. T-Approach was teacher centered and it
was found very boring and hence abysmally failed due to lack of language activities, wrong
selection of poem and ineffective teaching methodology. On the contrary, teachers of English
who used Stylistics approach in ESL classes were found convinced and satisfied with stylistics
approach. Around 95% teachers strongly supported the use of Stylistics approach in ESL classes.
They agreed that teaching of poetry based on language activities would improve language skills.
They applied the same model in the classroom and perceived that model as an important resource
for teaching language skills. 80% teachers strongly supported the idea that carefully chosen
poems might provide deep insight into literary expression. Based on the findings of four surveys
conducted in this study it can be deduced that poetry can be used as a great tool to improve
language skills if language based activities are incorporated and teaching of poetry turns into
learners centered.
The present study has certain limitation with regard to the statistical surveys. The surveys of this
study were conducted only on teachers and graduate students of Saudi universities. There is a
need to conduct such surveys on primary, secondary and higher secondary students. This may
lead to some more profound results which may be useful for researchers and curriculum
designers to rethink and incorporate poetry in ESL classes.
Disagree
I cant say
(2) Using poetry for teaching English will increase learners exciting learning experience.
Agree
Disagree
I cant say
Disagree
I cant say
(4) Carefully chosen poems may provide deep insight into literary expression.
Agree
Disagree
I cant say
(5) Learners efforts to analyze poems will increase their creative talents.
Agree
Disagree
I cant say
Strongly Agree
Disagree
(2) Teaching poetry with linguistics inputs encourage learners to learn vocabulary and
grammar besides the theme of the poem.
Agree
Strongly Agree
Disagree
(3) Open discussion on theme, form, style, similes and metaphors was found very useful
to improve speaking skill.
Agree
Strongly Agree
Disagree
(4) The task for writing small sentence was found interesting.
Agree
Strongly Agree
Disagree
1. Observation:
Teacher should ask students to read the poem aloud and listen to what and how they read.
2. To Mark Difference:
Students should listen to the poem either on YouTube or read by the teacher with good
accent, intonation and rhythm and mark the difference.
3. Drill Practice:
Students should read the poem in chorus (drill).
4. Individual Practice:
Each student should practice reading for ten minutes with low or medium loud tone.
5. Evaluation:
Teacher should ask each student to read the poem aloud with good accentual and intonation
patterns and mark Good, better, best. Such as
Better
Best
WORKSHEET NO: 01
Student Name: _______________________________________________________
Class:
_______________________________________________________
Lease
Complexion
Decline
Untrimmed
Brag
Eternal
Compare
Breathe
Fair
Golden
Eternal
Grow
Short
Windy
WORKSHEET NO: 02
(Section-E) Writing Skill:
The students will be asked to write small sentences on the following subjects:
Student Name: _____________________________________
Class:
_____________________________________
SUBJECT MATTER
1. What is the poem about?
______________________________________________________________________________
What is the main idea of the poem? Is there more than one idea?
______________________________________________________________________________
QUESTION ABOUT THE FORM OF THE POEM
2. What form has the poem been written in?
______________________________________________________________________________
Is there a definite rhyme scheme?
______________________________________________________________________________
What is the rhythmic structure?
______________________________________________________________________________
QUESTION ABOUT THE STYLE OF THE POEM
3. What does the poets choice of words tell you about the meaning?
______________________________________________________________________________
4. Write important words and Phrase such as: figures of speech and sounds of words
______________________________________________________________________________
5. Personal Impression:
______________________________________________________________________________
6. Do you like the poem?
______________________________________________________________________________
7. Why do you like the poem?
______________________________________________________________________________