Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

White Box Testing

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 17

White Box Testing

by :
Oerip S. Santoso
Introduction
• White Box Testing or Glass Box Testing
– Test case design method that uses the control structure of the procedural
design to derive test cases
• SW Engineer can derive test cases that
– guarantee that all independent paths within a module have been exercised
at least once
– exercise all logical decisions on their true and false bounds
– execute all loops at their boundaries and within their operational bounds
– exercise internal data structures to assure their validity
• Why not just validate the requirement ?
– Logic errors and incorrect assumptions are inversely proportional to the
probability that a program path will be executed
– We often believe that a logical path is not likely to be executed when, in
fact, it may be executed on a regular basis
– Typographical errors are random

12/2/03 Bayu Hendradjaya - http://www.if.itb.ac.id/~bayu 2


Basis Path/Control Structure Testing
• Proposed by Tom McCabe
• The basis path method enables the test case designer to derive a
logical complexity measure of a procedural design and use this
measure as a guide for defining a basis set of execution paths
• Flow Graph Notation: If

While
Sequence

Case
Repeat - Until

12/2/03 Bayu Hendradjaya - http://www.if.itb.ac.id/~bayu 3


Pseudo Code - Flow Chart
• Procedure Sort • Flow Chart
Procedure Sort
1. do while not eof
2. Read Record
3. if record field 1 = 0 1
4. then process record
5. store in buffer;
2
6. increment counter
7. else if record field 2 = 0
8. then reset counter 3
9. else process record
4
10. store in file 7
11. endif
9 5
12. endif 8
13. enddo
10 6

11

12

12/2/03 Bayu Hendradjaya - http://www.if.itb.ac.id/~bayu 4


Flow Chart - Flow Graph
• Flow Chart • Flow Graph
1

1
2,3

2
7

4 8 9,10 4,5,6
7

9 5
8
11
10 6

11 12
12

12/2/03 Bayu Hendradjaya - http://www.if.itb.ac.id/~bayu 5


Compound Logic

Predicate Node

IF a or b
b
then procedure X
else procedure Y
y x x
endif

12/2/03 Bayu Hendradjaya - http://www.if.itb.ac.id/~bayu 6


Cyclomatic Complexity ( V(G) )
• Cyclomatic Complexity
– software metric that provide a quantitative measure of the
logical complexity of a program]

V(G) = E - N + 2

V(G) = 9 - 8 + 2
=3

• The number of regions of the flow graph


correspond to the cyclomatic complexity.
• V(G) = P + 1, where P is the number of
predicate nodes

12/2/03 Bayu Hendradjaya - http://www.if.itb.ac.id/~bayu 7


Independent Path
• An independent path is any path through the program that introduces
at least one new set of processing statements or a new condition
• An independent path must move along at least one edge that has not
been traversed before the path is defined

path 1: 1-13
1
path 2: 1-2-3-7-8-11-12-1-13
2,3 path 3: 1-2-3-7-9-10-11-12-1-13

7
path 4: 1-2-3-4-5-6-12-1-13

8 9,10 4,5,6 Is the path


1-2-3-4-5-6-12-1-2-3-7-8-11-12-1-13
11
an independent path ?
13
12

12/2/03 Bayu Hendradjaya - http://www.if.itb.ac.id/~bayu 8


Deriving Test Cases
• Draw a corresponding flowgraph using the design or
code as a foundation
• Determine the cyclomatic complexity of the resultant
flow graph (V(g))
• Determine a basis set of linearly independent paths
• Prepare test cases that will force execution of each
path in the basis set
– if we have 6 independent paths, then we should have at
least 6 test cases. For each test cases, we should define
• the input conditions and
• the expected result.

12/2/03 Bayu Hendradjaya - http://www.if.itb.ac.id/~bayu 9


Graph Matrices
• Can automate derivation of flow graph and determination of a set of
basis paths.
• Software tools to do this can use a graph matrix.
• Graph matrix:
• is square with #sides equal to #nodes
• Rows and columns correspond to the nodes
• Entries correspond to the edges.
• Can associate a number with each edge entry.
• Use a value of 1 to calculate the cyclomatic complexity
• For each row, sum column values and subtract 1.

• Sum these totals and add 1.

12/2/03 Bayu Hendradjaya - http://www.if.itb.ac.id/~bayu 10


Some other interesting link weights:
• Probability that a link (edge) will be executed
• Processing time for traversal of a link
• Memory required during traversal of a link

• Resources required during traversal of a link

12/2/03 Bayu Hendradjaya - http://www.if.itb.ac.id/~bayu 11


Branch Testing
• Branch testing is the simplest condition testing
strategy
• For a compound condition C, the true and false
branches of C and every simple condition in C need
to be executed at least once

12/2/03 Bayu Hendradjaya - http://www.if.itb.ac.id/~bayu 12


Condition Testing (1)
• Condition Testing aims to exercise all logical conditions in a program
module.
• Can Define
– Relational Expression (E1 op E2) : where E1 and E2 are arithmetic
expression
– Simple Condition: Boolean variable or relational expression, possibly
preceded by a NOT operator
– Compound condition: composed of two or more simple conditions, boolean
operators and parentheses
– Boolean Expression: condition without relational expression
• Types of errors in a condition include the following
– boolean operator error (existence of incorrect/missing/extra boolean
operator)
– boolean variable error
– boolean parenthesis error
– relational operator error
– arithmetic expression error

12/2/03 Bayu Hendradjaya - http://www.if.itb.ac.id/~bayu 13


Condition Testing (2)
• The condition testing method focuses on testing each condition in the
program.
• Advantage of condition testing strategies
– measurement of test coverage of a condition is simple
– the test coverage of conditions in a program provides guidance for the
generation of additional tests for the program
• Some condition testing strategies
– Branch Testing
– Domain Testing
– Branch and Relational Operator Testing - uses condition constraints
• Example 1: C1 = B1 & B2
– Where B1, B2 are boolean conditions
– condition constraint of form D1, D2 where D1 and D2 can be true (t) or
false (f)
– The branch and relational operator test requires the constraint set { (t,t),
(f,t), (t,f) } to be covered by the execution of C1
• coverage of the constraint set guarantees detection of relational operator errors

12/2/03 Bayu Hendradjaya - http://www.if.itb.ac.id/~bayu 14


Data Flow Testing
• Data Flow testing method select test paths of a program according to
the locations of definitions and uses of variables in the program
• With Data flow testing
– each statement in a program is assigned a unique statement number and it
assumes that each function doesn’t modify its parameters or global
variables
• Defs( s ) = { x | statement S contains a definition of X }
• Use( s ) = { x | statement S contains a use of X }
• DU Chain (Definition - Use Chain) of variable X is of the form {X, S, S’},
where S, S’ are statement numbers, X is in Defs(S) and Defs(S’).
• Other possible chains are:
– DD (Definition-Definition Chain) - Should be avoided !! Why ??
– UU (Use-Use Chain) - common chain
– UD (Use-Definition Chain) - common chain
• One simple strategy is DU Testing Strategy.
– The strategy requires that every DU chain be covered at least once.

12/2/03 Bayu Hendradjaya - http://www.if.itb.ac.id/~bayu 15


Loop Testing
• Loop is fundamental to many algorithms.
• Loop can be defined as simple, concatenated, nested, and unstructured.

Nested Loops
Concatenated
Simple Loops
Loops

Unstructured
Loops
12/2/03 Bayu Hendradjaya - http://www.if.itb.ac.id/~bayu 16
Loop Testing (2)
• To test:
• Simple Loops of size n:
• Skip loop entirely
• Only one pass through loop
• Two passes through loop
• m passes through loop where m<n.
• (n-1), n, and (n+1) passes through the loop.
• Nested Loops
• Start with inner loop. Set all other loops to minimum values.
• Conduct simple loop testing on inner loop.
• Work outwards
• Continue until all loops tested.
• Concatenated Loops
• If independent loops, use simple loop testing.
• If dependent, treat as nested loops.
• Unstructured loops
• Don't test - redesign.
12/2/03 Bayu Hendradjaya - http://www.if.itb.ac.id/~bayu 17

You might also like