Vidarikand Paper.1
Vidarikand Paper.1
Vidarikand Paper.1
Research Article
INTRODUCTION
The Indian traditional system of medicines, especially Ayurveda,
plays a significant role in disease prevention and promotion of
health towards longevity with better quality of life[1]. The concept
of rasayana drugs of Ayurveda complemented by various research
findings suggested that the rasayana drugs may influence the host
immunity and resistance against infections[2]. Many medicinal
plants enlisted as Rasayana drugs in Ayurveda are believed to
improve defense mechanisms of the body, promote physical and
mental health and enhance longevity[3]. Indian medicinal plants are
a potential source of bioactive compounds which are reported to
potentiate immune responses by modulating the functions of
lymphocytes, granulocytes, macrophages, natural killer cells,
complements etc[4]. There is a growing concern in herbal drug
research about the actions of bioactive constituents on
immunomodulation. Since the active components cannot always be
reliably quantified in a complex plant extract, the interpretation of
assay data must be critically addressed using multiple strategies.
Therefore, the standardization of a plant extract is essential to
maintain the quality as well as to get the most favourable
concentrations of known active constituents during biological and
toxicological studies[5].
Pueraria tuberosa DC. Family: Fabaceae, is a perennial herb,
commonly known as Vidarikand distributed throughout the
tropical parts of India[6]. It is a reputed herb in Rasayana drugs in
Ayurveda for its aphrodisiac, longevity and rejuvenation properties.
In Ayurveda and folk medicines, plant tubers are used as restorative
tonic, antiaging, energizer, vital energy booster, galactagogue,
spermatogenic and immune booster[2]. Traditionally, the tubers are
also used against sexual debility, pain, inflammations, burning
sensations and skin problems[2]. Phytochemical investigations
reported that plants tubers contain puerarin, daidzein, genistein,
genistein, puerarone, coumarin, anthocyanin, lupinoside, tuberosin,
pterocarpintuberosin, puetuberosanol and hydroxytuberosone[7,8].
Among the phytochemicals listed above, the isoflavones puerarin,
daidzein and genistein are most important in term of their
immunomodulatory functions[8]. Recently, in-vivo antibody
Banerjee et al.
Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) consisted of Luna C18 (2) 100 , 250
4.6 mm (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) column, a 600 controller
pump, a multiple-wavelength ultraviolet-visible detector, an in-line
AF 2489 series degasser, a rheodyne 7725i injector with a 20 l
sample loop. The HPLC analysis was performed according to the
method described by Vaishnav et al[9]. Stock solutions of reference
standards, PR (1 mg/ml), DZ (1 mg/ml) and GS (1 mg/ml) were
prepared in methanol. The appropriate amount of each standard
was mixed separately to prepare working standard solutions
containing six different concentrations (100, 200, 400, 600, 800 and
1000 g/ml) of each standard. The aliquot was analyzed to construct
calibration curves by plotting peak areas against concentrations
injected by means of linear regression. The quantification of PR, DZ
and GS in the extract was determined from the corresponding
calibration curves.
Experimental animal
Swiss albino rats (70-80 g) of both sexes were used in these
experiments. Animals were housed under standard conditions of
temperature (25C 2), relative humidity (55.6% 10) and 12 h
light/dark cycle with standard food and water ad libitum. The
experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional
Animal Ethics Committee of Vidyasagar University, Midnapore,
India.
Selection of dose
Animals were randomly distributed in ten different groups and each
group consisted of six animals (n = 6). Effective experimental doses
were selected on the basis of previous studies i.e. PTTE 100 and 200
mg/kg[10]; PR 25 and 50 mg/kg; DZ 25 and 50 mg/kg[11] and GS 25
and 50 mg/kg[12]. Animals were grouped and orally treated in the
fashion as: Group I: control, normal saline; Group II: PTTE, 100
mg/kg; Group III: PTTE, 200 mg/kg; Group IV: PR, 25 mg/kg; Group
V: PR, 50 mg/kg; Group VI: DZ, 25 mg/kg; Group VII: DZ, 50 mg/kg;
Group VIII: GS, 25 mg/kg; Group IX: GS, 50 mg/kg; and Group X: LEV,
50 mg/kg.
Antigen (immunization)
Fresh sheep red blood cells (SRBCs) collected from the local
slaughterhouse were used to immunize the animals. SRBCs were
stored in a sterile Alsevers solution and washed thrice with pyrogen
free normal saline and cell numbers were adjusted to 0.5 109
cells/ml. Animals were immunized by intraperitoneal injection of 1
ml of 20% SRBCs suspension. The day of immunization was
considered as day 0. On the 5th day, blood samples were collected
from each animal through retro-orbital puncture to perform total
and differential leukocyte counts and NBT reduction test.
Total and differential leukocyte cell (TLC and DLC) counts
Collected blood samples were diluted with Turks fluid using
WBC pipette to lyses the red blood cells. The diluted blood
samples were subjected for total leukocyte counts using a
neubauers chamber. In DLC count, smears of each blood sample
were made on glass slides and stained with Leishmans stain.
The slides were examined under oil immersion microscopy and
the DLC counts were performed.
Nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) reduction test
Smears of blood samples made on glass slides were treated with
0.4 ml of NBT medium and incubated at 37C for 30 min. After
washing with cold saline water, the slides were stained with
safranin solution. The slides were examined under microscope
and the percentages of cells with reduced NBT dye were
determined[13].
Haemagglutinating antibody (HA) titre
On day 7, the blood samples were collected from each animal
through the retro-orbital puncture. The blood samples were
centrifuged to collect serum samples. Antibody titres were
determined using the haemagglutination technique. Briefly, twofold
862
Banerjee et al.
Basophil
1.47 0.05
1.21 0.08*
1.05 0.09***
0.90 0.07***
0.75 0.06***
1.12 0.09**
0.83 0.03***
0.98 0.05***
0.71 0.02***
0.32 0.04***
Monocyte
1.19 0.06
1.56 0.04**
2.16 0.08***
1.11 0.05
1.20 0.07
1.87 0.06***
2.34 0.05***
1.10 0.09
0.72 0.04***
0.62 0.07***
Lymphocyte
54.15 1.14
57.55 1.54
59.94 1.29*
58.40 1.20
60.86 1.35*
59.15 1.46
62.39 1.54**
54.58 1.87
54.77 1.51
45.13 1.31***
0.019 0.001
0.026 0.002
0.034 0.003***
0.032 0.001***
0.041 0.002***
0.030 0.002**
0.037 0.003***
0.015 0.002
0.011 0.001
0.081 0.003***
Values are tabulated as mean SEM; one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed Dunnetts t-test, values are compared with control animals,
***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01 and *P < 0.05.
Nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) reduction test
The dose dependent effects of PTTE (100 - 200 mg/kg), PR (25 - 50
mg/kg) and DZ (25 - 50 mg/kg) on the intracellular reduction of NBT
Fig. 2: NBT reduction in PTTE, PR, DZ and GS treated rats (n = 6). The bars of the graph represent mean SEM of six observations.
Statistical analysis was done through One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparison tests. Statistically significant
differences compared as: Control Vs PTTE, PR, DZ, GS and LEV treated groups (***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01 and *P < 0.001)
863
Fig. 3: HA titres against SRBCs-challenged in PTTE, PR, DZ and GS treated rats (n = 6). HA titre was dose dependently increased in PTTE,
PR and DZ treated groups and decreased in GS treated group when compared to the control group. The bars of the graph represent mean
SEM of six observations. Statistical analysis was done through one-way ANOVA followed Dunnetts t-tests (***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01 and *P <
0.05)
Delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) response
The cell-mediated immune response of PTTE, PR, DZ and GS was
assessed by DTH reaction, i.e. foot pad reaction. A dose dependent
Fig. 4: DTH response in PTTE, PR, DZ and GS treated rats (n = 6). DTH response was dose dependently suppressed by PTTE, PR, DZ and GS
in compared with the control group. The bars of the graph represent mean SEM of six observations. Statistical analysis was done
through one-way ANOVA followed Dunnetts t-tests (***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01 and *P < 0.05)
LEV 50
11.23
0.25***
10.06
0.16***
Neutrophils, % [B]
UB
FTB
38.40 1.10
36.55 1.25
38.23 1.15
32.73 1.24
38.34 1.25
31.68 1.45
38.17 1.15
37.01 1.26
38.37 1.38
37.47 1.57
34.87 1.25
33.64 1.47
32.28 1.32*
31.52 1.31
34.04 1.43
32.81 1.68
30.25
30.14
1.21***
1.54*
50.31
37.69 1.58
2.01***
Neutrophil index [A B]
UB
FTB
259.19 14.93
231.72 15.84
284.47 13.78
228.28 15.56
304.99 15.80
234.57 15.24
280.38 15.40
250.62 15.11
296.79 17.57
264.82 16.53
267.50 19.23
237.98 17.63
270.59 19.10
240.75 16.51
221.60 15.29
202.24 13.07
170.02 12.95**
160.42 10.54*
Neutrophil adhesion
(%)
10.88 1.10
20.14 1.83***
23.34 1.32***
10.73 1.16
10.82 1.23
11.06 1.77
10.95 1.49
8.55 1.69
5.25 1.30*
566.29 32.11***
32.83 1.36***
380.07 21.34***
Values are tabulated as mean SEM; one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed Dunnetts t-test, values are compared with control animals,
***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05; UB = untreated blood and FTB = fibre treated blood.
Phagocytic activity by carbon clearance test
The effects of PTTE, PR, DZ and GS on the clearance of carbon
particles, expressed as phagocytic index (K) are shown in Table 1. In
comparison to the control group, PTTE, PR and DZ augmented the
rate of carbon clearance at their specified concentration range in
rats. The phagocytic index was also increased by LEV (P > 0.001). GS
showed a dose dependent suppressive effect on the clearance of
carbon particles from the circulatory system of rats.
DISCUSSION
Modulation of the immune functions either by stimulation or
suppression may help to maintain a disease-free state[3]. Medicinal
plants used in traditional medicines are demonstrated to modulate
either cellular or humoral or both arms of the immune responses of
the body[14]. Plants contain several chemical constituents, of which
some constituents may have immunosuppressive activity, whereas
others possess immunostimulatory action[15]. The biological
activity of a plant extract is greatly dependent on its chemical
nature, composition and structure of the major active
metabolites[16]. Therefore, the quantitative determination of
specific known bioactive compounds in herbal medicines is essential
for quality control and dose determination in the toxicological and
biological activity studies. Therefore, PTTE was standardized to
quantify the major active constituents present, prior to evaluation of
its immunomodulatory potential. The isoflavones, PR, DZ and GS are
the most important bioactive constituents of P. tuberosa tubers used
as chemical markers for standardization. Results of HPLC analysis
revealed the abundant presence (%, w/w; n = 3) of PR (8.31 0.06),
DZ (1.70 0.04) and GS (1.37 0.02) in hydro-ethanolic PTTE.
The leukocytes including neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes,
eosinophils and basophils are involved in the development of an
immune response. Of these cells, lymphocytes are the hallmark of an
immune response because of its diversity, specificity, memory and
self/non-self recognition characteristics. All the other cells play
accessory roles like activation lymphocytes, stimulation of antigen
clearance by phagocytosis, secretion of various immune effector
molecules[15]. The haematopoietic action of a plant extract is
demonstrated to be a direct action on the hematopoietic stem
cells[17]. In TLC and DLC counts, PTTE, PR and DZ showed a dose
dependent increase in TLC count and populations of monocyte and
lymphocyte in rats (Table 1). However, PTTE and PR had no effect
on neutrophil population, while DZ and GS decreased neutrophil
population. The possible immunostimulatory effect of PTTE was
evidenced by an increase in the TLC count with the increase in the
population of monocytes and lymphocytes. These effects can be
explained by the effects of PR and DZ. Interestingly, the suppressive
Banerjee et al.
3.
8.
CONCLUSION
The present study, suggests that PTTE potentiate some innate
immune functions as well as humoral immunity in albino rats. Thus,
the extract augmented the host defense mechanisms by influencing
some immune cells functions and therefore it holds a promising
therapeutic potential as to modulate the host immune responses of
humans. In conclusion, the results of the present study preliminarily
validate the immunomodulatory function of P. tuberosa in animals
however clinical studies would mandate the validation of its
utilization in the herbal formulations for humans. Specific
observations lead to the conclusion that PR and DZ increase the TLC,
monocytes and lymphocyte populations, HA titre, phagocytic index,
NBT reduction and suppress the DTH response, while GS possess
suppressive effect on all the above parameters including neutrophil
adhesion. The net effect of PTTE is therefore immunostimulatory,
while it stimulates TLC, monocytes and lymphocyte populations, HA
titre, phagocytic index, NBT reduction, neutrophil adhesion and also
suppresses DTH response, the overall impact dose dependently dose
dependently stimulates the immune system. However, further
studies need to be designed and conducted with PR, DZ and GS in
various combinations taken two at a time and all three combined as
against PTTE with control groups to determine the specific
mechanism by which the GSs immunosuppressive action is
REFERENCES
1.
2.
4.
5.
6.
7.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
866
Banerjee et al.
867