Cb-Past Form 2
Cb-Past Form 2
Cb-Past Form 2
(CB-PAST MT)
Name:
School:
District:
School Year:
Position Title:
CATANAUAN
2014-2015
First Semester:
P-Proficient;
Division:
QUEZON
Second Semester:
HP-Highly Proficient
A. Diversity of Learners
Within the appraisal period, I
1
set objectives that are within the experiences and capabilities of learners
2
utilized varied designs, techniques and activities suited to the different kinds of learners.
3
paced lessons appropriate to the needs and difficulties of learners
4
provided appropriate intervention activities for learners at risk.
5
recognized multi-cultural background of learners when providing learning opportunities.
6
adopted strategies to address needs of differently-abled learners.
7
showed fairness and consideration to all learners, regardless of socio-economic backgrounds.
8
mentored peers in the grade/year level of the area of specialization in using strategies that address diversity of learners.
TOTAL SCORE:
B. Curriculum Content and Pedagogy
Within the appraisal period, I
delivered accurate and updated content knowledge using appropriate methodologies, approaches, and strategies
developed and/or implemented innovative and functional teaching approaches and strategies every year as follows.
MT I II: at least one
MT III IV: at least two
3
used intergrative approaches in teaching such as Content Based Instruction (CBI), Multiple Intelligence Learning Approach
(MILA), and multidisciplinary approach, among others.
4
explained learning goals, instructional procedure
5
linked the current content with past and future lessons.
6
Aligned the lesson objectives, teaching methods, learning activities and instructional materials or resource appropriate
to the learners.
7
Created situations that encourage learners to use higher order thinking skills through the use of the local language among
others if needed.
8
engaged and sustained learners interest in the subject by making content meaningful and relevant to them.
9
integrated scholarly works and ideas to enrich the lesson
10 established routines and procedures to maximize instructional time.
11
selected prepared and utilized available technology and other instructional materials appropriate to the learners and the
learning objectives
12 provided appropriate learning tasks, portfolio and projects that support development of good study habits.
13 used Information and Communication Technology (ICT) resources for planning and designing teaching learning activities.
14 served as demonstration teacher and/or consultant
MT I: at least school and division level
MT II: school, district and division levels
MT III: school, district, division and regional levels
MT IV: school, district, division, regional and national tasks
15 assumed leadership in the improvement of instructional program
MT I: in at least two grade/year levels
MT II: in at least three grade/year levels
MT III: in at least four grade/three year levels
MT IV: in all grade/year levels
16 conducted classroom observations
MT I: in at least two grade/year levels
MT II: in at least three grade/year levels
MT III: in at least four grade/three year levels
MT IV: in all grade/year levels
17 onducted instructional training programs in the school, district, or division
18 mentored a peer on how to plan and conduct action research
TOTAL SCORE:
BB-1
Appraisal Rating
B-2
P-3 HP-4
1
2
BB-1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Appraisal Rating
B-2
P-3 HP-4
BB-1
involved parents/community in sharing accountability for learners' achievement
used varied and available community resources (human, materials) to support learning
used community as a laboratory for learning
got involved in / shared community information of school and achievements.
shared to the community information on school events and achievements.
led students to apply classroom learning to the community
informed learners, parents and other stakeholders regarding school policies and procedures
planned, organized and led a school-community activity as a model for peers such as Clean and Green, Brigada Eskwela,
sports clinic, waste management etc
TOTAL SCORE:
Appraisal Rating
B-2
P-3 HP-4
Appraisal Rating
B-2
P-3 HP-4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Appraisal Rating
B-2
P-3 HP-4
Appraisal Rating
B-2
P-3 HP-4
1
2
3
4
PART II-THE PLUS FACTOR-Only teachers who have an overall rating description of Highly Proficient or Basic shall claim for the Plus Factor component in the Appraisa
the Appraisal System
I. PLUS FACTOR FOR INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE-- Choose any five (5), each equivalent to .04.
1 Conducted meetings/home visitations of students at least four (4) times to improve teaching learning situations.
2 Acted as resource person in at least four (4) processional development activities (i.e. seminar, workshop, trainings, conference) in either
pre-service or in-service trainings in the school, district or division.
3 Provided professional assistance to peers on how to plan and conduct action research.
4 Initiated, organized and conducted a training program for teachers.
5 Designed evaluation and monitoring program for the school, district or division.
6 Conducted curricular review or similar activity in the school, district or division.
7 Increased the difference in the achievement rate or the division post test over the prt test by 5% or higher in all classes taught.
8 No dropout rate during the appraisal period.
9 Others related to Instructional Competence (specify)
0
TOTAL
II. NO PLUS FACTOR FOR SCHOOL, HOME COMMUNITY LINKAGES (All items are included as required)
III. PLUS FACTOR FOR PERSONAL, SOCIAL GROWTH, AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT CHARACTERISTICS-Choose any 5, each eqivalent to .04.
1 Received award for recognition as exemplary teacher for both personal and professional attributes by a recognized body or agency
at the school, district, division, regional and national level.
2 Earned a higher relevant degree.
3 Published at least one (1) article in professional magazines/periodicals related to the field of specialization.
4 Presented a paper in regional, national and international conference.
5 Received a scholarship/fellowships/travel/research/observation grant or secondment of not less than one (1) year, through a competitive
selection. The credit shall be earned after the scholarship/grant/secondment has been finished. If less than one year, it shall be prorated in months.
6 Represented the DepEd in the regional, national, or international forum related to the current assignment.
7 Others related to Personal Growth and Professional Development Characteristics (Please specify)
0
TOTAL
Criteria
Assigned Weight
in CB-PAST
No. of Items
Score
I. INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE
60%
Diversity of Learners
10%
8
0
Curriculum Content and Pedagogy
30%
18
0
Planning, Assessing and Reporting
20%
10
0
Sum of Weighted Average of A, B & C
II. HOME, SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
20%
Learning Environment
10%
7
0
Community Linkages
10%
8
0
Sum of Weighted Average of D & E
III. PERSONAL GROWTH AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
20%
Social Regard for Learning
10%
5
0
Personal, Social Growth and Professional
11
0
10%
Development
Sum of Weighted Average of F & G
Formative Performance Rating
(Sum of the Total Weighted Mean from A to G only for Formative Appraisal)
Descriptive Overall Performance Rating in TPI for Formative Appraisal
Plus Factor (for Summative Appraisal)
Each item gets 0.04. A maximum of 0.4 will be added to the Total Weighted Average)
Summative Performance Rating
(Sum of the Total Weighted Mean from A to G and the Plus Factor Earned)
Description of Overall Performance Rating with critical Requirement for Summative Appraisal
Description of the
TPI (Teacher
Performance Index)
Weigted Average
(Mean x Weight)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Highly Proficient
0
0
0
Below Basic
OVER-ALL
Desc PERFORMANCE RATING DESCRIPTION AND CRITICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SUMMATIVE APPRAISAL
riptio
Perf
n of
CRITICAL REQUIREMENTS
orma
Over
who does NOT meet
nce the critical requirement will get the next lower level of the overall performance rating.
all
Ratin
Outstanding
3.51 or higher and no performance index or below proficient in any of the standards.
g Satisfactory
Very
2.51 or higher and no performance index or below basic in any of the standards.
Satisfactory
1.51-2.50 and no performance index value below basic in any of the standards.
Below Basic
1.00 or higher with at least one performance index values below basic in any of the standards.
Remarks:
Agreements:
I hereby certify that my self-rating reflects the true and honest evaluation for my teaching performance.
Ratee:
Name and Signature of Teacher
Date:
Conferred with:
Reviewed by:
REYNALDO B. ASUNCION
ESMERALDA N. TAN
Principal II
OIC District / P II
Recommending Approval:
**mfc27**
Approved by:
GERLIE M. ILAGAN, Ph. D.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
##0
##0
##0
##0
##0
##
##
##0
##0
##0
##0
##
##
##
###
###
##
##
##0
##0
##0
##0
##0
###
###
###
###
###
##0
##0
##0
##0
##0
##
##
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
tion of Highly Proficient or Basic shall claim for the Plus Factor component in the Appraisal System.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Catanauan District
COMPETENCY-BASED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM FOR TEACHERS
CB-PAST FORM 1
(CB-PAST)
Name:
School:
District:
School Year:
MELVIN E. OCHINANG
DOONGAN ILAYA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
CATANAUAN
2015-2016
First Semester:
Position Title:
TEACHER I
Division:
QUEZON
Second Semester:
B-Basic;
I. INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE
P-Proficient; HP-Highly Proficient
A. Diversity of Learners
Appraisal Rating
B-2
P-3
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
20
HP-4
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
delivered accurate and updated content knowledge using appropriate methodologies, approaches, and strategies
used integration of language, literacy, numeracy skills and value in teaching
explained learning goals, instructional procedures, and content clearly and accurately to students
linked the current content with past and future lessons.
aligned the lesson objectives, teaching methods, learning activities and instructional materials or resources appropriate
to the learners.
6 created situations that encourage learners to use higher order thinking skills through the use of the local language among
others if needed.
7 engaged and sustained learner's interest in the subject by making content meaningful and relevant to them.
8 integrated scholarly works and ideas to enrich the lesson
9 established routines and procedures to maximize instructional time.
10 selected prepared and utilized available technology and other instructional materials appropriate to the learners
and the learning objectives
11 provided appropriate learning tasks, portfolio and projects that support development of good study habits.
12 used Information and Communication Technology (ICT) resources for planning and designing teaching learning activities.
TOTAL SCORE:
Appraisal Rating
B-2
P-3
/
/
/
/
/
HP-4
###
###
###
###
###
###
/
/
###
###
###
###
/
/
/
###
###
32
Appraisal Rating
B-2
P-3
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
25
HP-4
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
D. Learning Environment
Within the appraisal period, I
BB-1
1 provided equal opportunities for all learners regardless of gender
2 maintained a safe and orderly classroom free from distractions.
3 used individual and cooperative learning activities to improve capabilities of learners for higher learning
4 inspired learners to value and set high performance targets for themselves
5 handled behavior problems quickly and with due respect to children's rights
6 created situation that develop a positive attitude among learners towards their subject and teacher.
TOTAL SCORE:
Appraisal Rating
B-2
P-3
/
/
/
/
/
/
16
HP-4
###
###
###
###
###
###
E. Community Linkages
Within the appraisal period, I
BB-1
1
2
3
4
5
6
Appraisal Rating
B-2
P-3
/
/
/
/
/
/
HP-4
###
###
###
###
###
###
14
TOTAL SCORE:
III. PERSONAL, SOCIAL GROWTH, AND PROFESSIONAL CHARACTERISTICS
F. Social Regard for Learning
Within the appraisal period, I
BB-1
1
2
3
4
Appraisal Rating
B-2
P-3
/
/
/
/
HP-4
###
###
###
###
11
TOTAL SCORE:
G. Personal, Social Growth and Professional Development
Within the appraisal period, I
BB-1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Appraisal Rating
B-2
P-3
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
HP-4
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
26
TOTAL SCORE:
PART II-THE PLUS FACTOR-Only teachers who have an overall rating description of Highly Proficient or Basic shall claim for the Plus Factor component in th
the Appraisal System
I. PLUS FACTOR FOR INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE:
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
II. PLUS FACTOR FOR SCHOOL, HOME COMMUNITY LINKAGES : Choose any three (3), each equivqlent to .04
1 Organized and implemented at least one (1) home-school-implemented-community project in rating period which resulted to enhance
resulting outcomes
2 Established a model that exemplifies a learning environment conducive to teaching and learning (i.e. Science Gardens,
Mathematics laboratory, model classroom, others)
3 Made at least one (1) best practice on how to involve majority of the parents in the education of their children.
4 Conducted at least one action research and shared results to peers on problems related to learning environment, home, school
and community involvement.
5 Conducted at least two home visitations to encourage parents to support their children in their school activities, to reduce absenteeism
and tardiness.
6 Others not included but related to school, home, and community involvement.
###
###
###
###
###
###
TOTAL
III. PLUS FACTOR FOR PERSONAL, SOCIAL GROWTH, AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT CHARACTERISTICS: Choose any 3, each equivalent to .04
1 Received award for recognition as exemplary personal and professional attributes such as honesty and integrity, leadership, dedication,
initiative, courtesy, fairness of an outstanding teacher from recognized academic institutions and other award giving bodies.
2 Acted as coach or trainer to award winning students or group of students in academic and in non-academic contests recognized at least
at the division level.
3 Earned relevant professional trainings (an aggregate of at least 60 hours) or graduated from a higher relevant degree.
4 Received scholarship awards, educational exchange, educational observation, study tour and the like which have competitive
screening process. (Claim can only be made after the award has been enjoyed)
5 Other not mentioned but related to personal and professional characteristics.
0
TOTAL
###
###
###
###
###
Assigned Weight
in CB-PAST
No. of Items
Score
I. INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE
60%
20
Diversity of Learners
10%
7
32
Curriculum Content and Pedagogy
30%
12
25
Planning, Assessing and Reporting
20%
9
Sum of Weighted Average of A, B & C
II. HOME, SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
20%
16
Learning Environment
10%
6
14
Community Linkages
10%
6
Sum of Weighted Average of D & E
III. PERSONAL GROWTH AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
20%
11
Social Regard for Learning
10%
4
26
Personal, Social Growth and Professional
10%
10
Development
Sum of Weighted Average of F & G
Formative Performance Rating
(Sum of the Total Weighted Mean from A to G only for Formative Appraisal)
Descriptive Overall Performance Rating in TPI for Formative Appraisal
Plus Factor (for Summative Appraisal)
Each item gets 0.04. A maximum of 0.4 will be added to the Total Weighted Average)
Summative Performance Rating
(Sum of the Total Weighted Mean from A to G and the Plus Factor Earned)
Description of Overall Performance Rating with critical Requirement for Summative Appraisal
Mean (Score
No. of Items)
2.86
2.67
2.78
Description of the
Weigted Average (Mean x
TPI (Teacher
Weight)
Performance Index)
0.29
0.8
0.56
Proficient
Proficient
Proficient
1.65
2.67
2.33
0.27
0.23
Proficient
Basic
0.5
2.75
2.6
0.28
0.26
Proficient
Proficient
0.54
2.69
Proficient
0
2.69
Very Satisfactory
CRITICAL REQUIREMENTS
Note: A teacher who does NOT meet the critical requirement will get the next lower level of the overall performance rating.
3.51 or higher and no performance index or below proficient in any of the standards.
2.51 or higher and no performance index or below basic in any of the standards.
1.51-2.50 and no performance index value below basic in any of the standards.
1.00 or higher with at least one performance index values below basic in any of the standards.
Remarks:
Agreements:
I hereby certify that my self-rating reflects the true and honest evaluation for my teaching performance.
Ratee:
MELVIN E. OCHINANG
Name and Signature of Teacher
Date:
Conferred with:
Reviewed by:
JENIFER E. SARMIENTO
Officer-In-Charge / Teacher III
Recommending Approval:
CELEDONIO B. BALDERAS, Jr. CESE
Asst. Schools Division Superintendent
MARILYN N. PERMEJO
District Supervisor
Approved by:
TOLENTINO G. AQUINO, CESO VI
Schools Division Superintendent