Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 731 views

    12 Angry Men: The Prominent Barriers To Communication As Depicted in The Movie Are

    Uploaded by

    pushkarsingh27
    Juror 8 was able to successfully change the views of the other jurors and reach a consensus verdict. He stood out as an ideal juror, having no bias or preconceived notions. He showed great interest in thoroughly discussing the case rather than rushing to judgment. Juror 8 was a great listener and observer who critically analyzed others' views and provided logical challenges when needed. His analytical skills were demonstrated through his challenges to witness testimony and calculated assumptions. Juror 8 remained cogent and convincing throughout, which ultimately led to a transformation of the other jurors' views to reach the correct not guilty verdict.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    12 Angry Men: The Prominent Barriers To Communication As Depicted in The Movie Are

    Uploaded by

    pushkarsingh27
    731 views3 pages
    Juror 8 was able to successfully change the views of the other jurors and reach a consensus verdict. He stood out as an ideal juror, having no bias or preconceived notions. He showed great interest in thoroughly discussing the case rather than rushing to judgment. Juror 8 was a great listener and observer who critically analyzed others' views and provided logical challenges when needed. His analytical skills were demonstrated through his challenges to witness testimony and calculated assumptions. Juror 8 remained cogent and convincing throughout, which ultimately led to a transformation of the other jurors' views to reach the correct not guilty verdict.

    Original Description:

    Movie Analysis

    Original Title

    12 Angry Men

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Juror 8 was able to successfully change the views of the other jurors and reach a consensus verdict. He stood out as an ideal juror, having no bias or preconceived notions. He showed great interest in thoroughly discussing the case rather than rushing to judgment. Juror 8 was a great listener and observer who critically analyzed others' views and provided logical challenges when needed. His analytical skills were demonstrated through his challenges to witness testimony and calculated assumptions. Juror 8 remained cogent and convincing throughout, which ultimately led to a transformation of the other jurors' views to reach the correct not guilty verdict.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    731 views3 pages

    12 Angry Men: The Prominent Barriers To Communication As Depicted in The Movie Are

    Uploaded by

    pushkarsingh27
    Juror 8 was able to successfully change the views of the other jurors and reach a consensus verdict. He stood out as an ideal juror, having no bias or preconceived notions. He showed great interest in thoroughly discussing the case rather than rushing to judgment. Juror 8 was a great listener and observer who critically analyzed others' views and provided logical challenges when needed. His analytical skills were demonstrated through his challenges to witness testimony and calculated assumptions. Juror 8 remained cogent and convincing throughout, which ultimately led to a transformation of the other jurors' views to reach the correct not guilty verdict.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    12 ANGRY MEN

    30 th June 30,

    2015
    [Submitted by: Pushkar Kumar Singh 15P100]

    The prominent barriers to communication as depicted in the movie


    are:
    JUROR 1
    Started acting as a moderator but could not manage the discussion later. He also lost
    interest at some times after having disagreement with fellow juror. He had been a poor
    listener and a poor moderator.

    JUROR 2
    Juror 2 did not have any thoughts of his own. During the voting, raising his hand after
    seeing everyone, and could not been able to speak up when asked for his views suggests
    that he does not have his own ideas and stand.

    JUROR 3
    Juror 3 had have prejudice since the beginning because of his personal life issues with his
    son. This strong view of his made him non-receptive and often unnecessarily very
    aggressive during most of the discussion. He was verbose many a times when he spoke.

    JUROR 4
    Juror 4 lacked analytical ability to discuss the case in detail. He firstly called the
    accused testimony as flimsy which was later contradicted by his own arguments. He also
    showed lack of clarity and detailed analysis in his points.

    JUROR 5
    Juror 5 lacked confidence while presenting himself. Firstly, he didnt put up any reasoning
    and passed his turn. Later he defended the pre conceived notions of the other juror about
    people hailing from the slums.

    JUROR 6
    Juror 6 did not have the clarity in his points and could not analyze the case properly. He
    was being corrected by others while quoting the facts in the delivery of his view.

    JUROR 7
    Juror 7 showed lack of interest and a lot of bias against the accused. He did not put his
    points properly, stood up and started talking casually. Such a wrong body language
    from a juror was reflecting his insincerity and was also affecting the discipline in the
    discussion.

    JUROR 9
    Juror 9, the oldest of all the jury, did not contribute much, but played a major role by
    changing his stand from guilty to not-guilty so as to extend the discussion and make a
    proper decision hence forth.

    JUROR 10
    Juror 10 showed a highly biased and racist mentality, he put forth some illogical points
    such as raising up of a child in slums, and other discriminatory views to prove the
    accused guilty. This strong negative belief and attitude made him adamant to his stand till
    the very end of the discussion. It also showed his poor listening skills and poor acuity.

    JUROR 11
    Juror 11 had pre conceived notions in the beginning, but showed good understanding
    and agility later on and changed his vote to not guilty. He appreciated democracy and
    showed his interest to bring in justice to the accused.

    JUROR 12
    Juror 12 showed the most lack of interest in the whole discussion. He was found doodling
    and discussing about marketing techniques, which was totally irrelevant to the case. His
    attitude reflected lack of collaboration and insincerity towards the jury and the case.

    Skills showed by Juror 8 to make a successful conversation, and hence


    to convince others:
    JUROR 8
    Juror 8 stood up as an ideal juror, having no bias, no preconceived notions, no
    other form of discriminations and always open to discuss the case. He showed a
    great interest in discussing the case rather than jumping to the conclusion like others. He
    had been a great listener, an observer and a critic throughout the discussion. He was
    open to others view and also contradicted them if they were incorrect. His challenge
    to the testimony of the witnesses, and putting forth calculated and logical assumptions
    showed his great analytical skills. He was always cogent and convincing, which was
    2

    evidently seen in the transformation of the views of the other jury members. All these
    qualities made him able to change everyones view and reach a consensus.

    You might also like