Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Remote Sense Big Data Analytics

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 30

Deep Learning for Big Data

in Remote Sensing
Mohamad Ivan Fanany, Sidik Mulyono, T. Basaruddin

Faculty of Computer Science Universitas Indonesia


in cooperation with Indonesian Agency
of Assessment and Application of Technology (BPPT)

Page 1

High Resolution Earth Observation

Increasing Complexity, Diversity, Dimensionality,


Page 2

Remote Sensing Big Data


Challenges
Increasing complexity of RS data: diversity and higher
dimensionality.
Large data-intensive issues: tasks and data
dependencies
Current platform are CPU-heavy but I/O- poor which do
not work non-contiguously.

Page 3

Remote Sensing Big Data


Opportunities from Tech. Leapfrogging
1. Some supercomputers and Cloud computing
platforms optimized for data-intensive loads;
2. Parallel file systems and databases takes
the data availability and locality as the main
concern;
3. The data managing tools for memory data
placement controlling for multilevel data
locality;
4. Task scheduling focusing on large amount of
dependent tasks and data availability.
Page 4

Remote Sensing Data Processing Flow

Page 5

Remote Sensing Utilization for


Indonesian Food Security Program
Rice field area: 8.1 million hectares
Population: 240 million
National rice need: 32 million T/year

Page 6

Paddy Growth Stages Classification


Hyperspectral HyMap Image

SAMPLING AREA: Karawang, West Java Indonesia


(06 15 46.24S, 107 25 05.1E)

Page 7

Rice Yield Estimation

The composited Images from 10


lines of HyMap Hyperspectral
Airborne Campaign
(Karawang 2011)

Paddy yield distribution map


with GA-NSPCR
Total production: 186,898 Ton
Harvested Area: 30,966 Ha
Page
Yield average: 6.00 Ton/Ha

Remote Sensing Data Fusion for


Integrated Prediction

HyMap Hyperspectral
(4.4 m spatial res
124 band spectral res)

MODIS Multispectral
(1.000 m spatial res
7 band spctral res)

Hyperspectral based
MODIS integration model
Yield
prediction

Growth
stages

Page 9

Overall accuracy
= 84.96%
Statistical Validation

Page 10

Recent Results
after Cloud Detection
Recent
and Removal Only on MODIS Data

Page 11

Recent Results
after Cloud Detection
Recent
and Removal Only on MODIS Data

Page 12

Recent Results
after Cloud Removal
Recent
Only on MODIS Data

Page 13

Scaling Up Model Building


Beyond Supersite Limited Estimation

Page 14

Deep Learning for Accurate Land


Cover and Land Use Prediction

Page 15

Deep Learning for Accurate Land


Cover and Land Use Prediction

Page 16

Deep Learning for Accurate Land


Cover and Land Use Prediction

Page 17

Analysis on DeepSAT Datasets


(Basu et al. 2015)

Hand Crafted Features as Deep Learning Input,


Page 18

Analysis on DeepSAT Datasets


(Basu et al. 2015)
Classification Accuracy using DBN,

Conventional DL

Proposed DL
Page 19

Analysis on DeepSAT Datasets


(Basu et al. 2015)

Classification Accuracy using CNN,


Page 20

Analysis on DeepSAT Datasets


(Basu et al. 2015)

Classification Accuracy using SDAE


Page 21

Analysis on DeepSAT Datasets


(Basu et al. 2015)

Classification Accuracy using SDAE


Page 22

Why Traditional Deep Architectures


are Not Enough for SAT Datasets?
Satellite datasets have higher intra and inter-class
variability.
The amount of labeled data is much smaller as
compared to the total size of the dataset.
Higher-order texture features are a very important
discriminative parameter for various land cover
classes.
Shape/edge based features are not very useful in
learning data representations for satellite imagery.
Spatially contextual information is another important
parameter fo.r modeling satellite imagery.
Page 23

Satelite Image Feature Ranking

Page 24

What are we currently doing?


Proposal by Tanaka et al. 2013

Page 25

What are we currently doing?


Proposal by Tanaka et al. 2013

Page 26

What are we currently doing?


Proposal by Tanaka et al. 2013

Page 27

What are we currently doing?


Proposal by Tanaka et al. 2013

Page 28

What we are currently doing?


Some Lingering Questions
How far Deep Learning can go?:
Texture based prediction of vegetation and its
growth stages
Flatten frequency bands of MODIS or even
Hyperspectral data into a single channel for
classification?
Are commonly used remote sensing parameters
such as NDVI, EVI, GPP in multi or hyper bands
based classification have higher Distribution
Separation Criterion?
Page 29

THANK YOU
Q&A

Page 30

You might also like