Seminario 11 Inmuno
Seminario 11 Inmuno
Seminario 11 Inmuno
Transplant Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Edited by:
Xian Chang Li, Brigham and Womens
Hospital, USA
Reviewed by:
Joan Stein-Streilein, Schepens Eye
Research Institute, USA
Zhibin Chen, University of Miami
Miller School of Medicine, USA
*Correspondence:
Joren C. Madsen, Massachusetts
General Hospital, Cox 654, 55 Fruit
Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
e-mail: jcmadsen@partners.org
INTRODUCTION
Colossal advances over the past decades with the use of immunosuppressive drugs have signicantly enhanced the early survival of
allogeneic organs and tissues in clinical transplantation (Cecka,
1998; Opelz et al., 1999; Opelz and Dohler, 2008a,b). Nevertheless, longer term success rates remain disappointing due to
treatment-related complications and chronic allograft rejection, a
process characterized by perivascular inammation, tissue brosis, and luminal occlusion of graft blood vessels (Hayry et al.,
1993; Hosenpud et al., 1997; Russell et al., 1997; Kean et al., 2006).
This stresses the need for the development of selective immunetherapies designed to achieve transplantation tolerance dened
as indenite graft survival in the absence of immunosuppression and graft vasculopathy (Billingham et al., 1953; Owen et al.,
1954). While tolerance to some solid organ allografts has been
accomplished in several experimental rodent models, consistent
establishment of tolerance in patients still remains an elusive goal.
It is rmly established that the potent adaptive immune responses
initiated by pro-inammatory T cells activated via direct and indirect pathways in the hosts secondary lymphoid organs are both
necessary and sufcient to ensure acute rejection of most allografts (Benichou et al., 1992, 1999; Fangmann et al., 1993; Sayegh
et al., 1994; Auchincloss and Sultan, 1996; Lee et al., 1997; Waaga
et al., 1997). At the same time, it is now rmly established that
the presence of alloreactive memory T cells or donor-specic antibodies in so-called sensitized recipients represents a formidable
www.frontiersin.org
barrier to transplant tolerance induction (Adams et al., 2003a; Taylor et al., 2004; Valujskikh, 2006; Koyama et al., 2007; Weaver et al.,
2009; Nadazdin et al., 2010, 2011; Yamada et al., 2011). Indeed,
much effort is currently devoted to the elimination or inhibition
of donor-specic memory T cells (TMEM) in primates, which,
unlike laboratory mice, display high frequencies of alloreactive
TMEM prior to transplantation (Nadazdin et al., 2010, 2011).
Altogether, the majority of transplant immunologists have focused
their efforts on the deletion and/or inactivation of alloreactive T
and B cells, pre-transplantation. On the other hand, recent studies
have proven beyond doubt that innate immunity is also an essential
element of both acute and chronic rejection of allo- and xenografts
(LaRosa et al., 2007; Alegre et al., 2008a,b; Alegre and Chong, 2009;
Li, 2010; Goldstein, 2011; Murphy et al., 2011). Innate immune
responses are initiated as a consequence of reperfusion injury,
inammation, tissue damage, and presumably microbial infections occurring at the time of transplantation (Figure 1). Different
cells of the innate immune system can contribute to the rejection
process both directly via secretion of soluble factors and destruction of donor grafted cells as well as indirectly by initiating or
enhancing adaptive immune alloresponses while impairing the
activation/expansion of protective regulatory T cells (Figure 1). At
the same time, there is increasing evidence suggesting that different
cells and molecules associated with innate immunity can hinder
tolerance induction to allografts and xenografts (LaRosa et al.,
2007; Alegre et al., 2008b; Wang et al., 2008; Murphy et al., 2011).
Benichou et al.
Benichou et al.
www.frontiersin.org
Benichou et al.
the inammatory process as well as the immune response associated with the rejection of allogeneic transplants (Zhou et al., 2007;
Raedler et al., 2009; Raedler and Heeger, 2010; Vieyra and Heeger,
2010). First, many studies have demonstrated the contribution of
the complement to I/R injury following transplantation of a variety of organs including liver, kidney, and lungs (Weisman et al.,
1990; Ikai et al., 1996; Eppinger et al., 1997; Huang et al., 1999;
Zhou et al., 2000; Chan et al., 2006; Farrar et al., 2006; Patel et al.,
2006). Remarkably, mice lacking complement have been shown to
be unable to make high afnity anti-MHC antibodies after skin
transplantation. This was due to the lack of CR2 expression, a
coreceptor that is required for antigen retention by follicular DCs
(Fearon and Carroll, 2000; Marsh et al., 2001; Pratt et al., 2002).
On the other hand, the complement plays an important role in the
antigen processing presentation by DCs and controls their ability
to activate T cells in antigen-specic fashion. Finally, elegant studies from the Heegers group and others have demonstrated the role
of C3 in the activation and expansion of both CD4+ and CD8+
T cells presumably by limiting antigen-induced apoptosis (Fearon
and Carroll, 2000; Marsh et al., 2001; Pratt et al., 2002; Peng et al.,
2006, 2008; Zhou et al., 2006; Lalli et al., 2008; Strainic et al., 2008).
Altogether, these studies suggest that activation of the complement
cascade following transplantation should render tolerance difcult
to induce. In support of this view, it has been shown that blockade
of complement activation on DCs results in an increase of Treg
expansion and favors tolerance induction (Sacks et al., 2009).
NK CELLS
Benichou et al.
www.frontiersin.org
Benichou et al.
Granulocytes, mastocytes, and monocytes/macrophages are traditionally considered as key players in both early innate alloimmune
response and in the actual destruction of donor cells after transplantation. However, the mechanisms by which they contribute to
alloimmunity and the actual nature of their contribution to allograft rejection have not been thoroughly investigated. Likewise,
little is known regarding the impact of these cells in transplantation tolerance. This section reviews some of the few studies that
have tackled these questions.
Granulocytes are the most abundant leukocytes in the blood
of mammals and an essential part of the innate immune system. Among them, PMNs migrate within hours to the site of
acute inammation after transplantation following chemical signals such as IL-8, C5a, and Leukotriene B4 in a process called
chemotaxis. However, they survive only 13 days at the graft site
where they undergo degranulation and release reactive oxygen
species (ROS), a process involving the activation of NADPH oxidase and the production of superoxide anions and other highly
reactive oxygen metabolites which cause tissue damage (Jaeschke
et al., 1990). There is ample evidence showing that PMNs contribute to donor tissue destruction and graft rejection in skin
transplantation, solid organ transplantation, and bone marrow
transplantation (Buonocore et al., 2004; Surquin et al., 2005).
Studies from the Fairchilds group have demonstrated that Abs
directed to KC/CXCL1 can prolong cardiac allograft survival by
preventing PMNs from graft inltrating the graft (Morita et al.,
2001; LaRosa et al., 2007). Additionally, the potential role of PMNs
in the prevention of tolerance induction has been examined in two
recent studies, only. First, it has been reported that peritransplant
elimination of PMNs facilitated tolerance to fully mismatched cardiac allografts induced via costimulation blockade (El-Sawy et al.,
2005; Mollen et al., 2006; LaRosa et al., 2007). Most interestingly,
another study from Woods group shows that prevention of accelerated rejection of skin allografts by CD8+ effector memory T cells
could be achieved by Tregs but only following depletion of PMNs
(Jones et al., 2010). It is likely that elimination of PMNs created a
Benichou et al.
www.frontiersin.org
Benichou et al.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
It is now rmly established that innate immune responses triggered after transplantation as a consequence of tissue damage,
infections, and reperfusion injury are an essential element of the
inammatory process leading to early rejection of allografts. In
addition, there is accumulating evidence showing the contribution
of innate immunity to chronic rejection of allogeneic transplants.
On the other hand, this review supports the view that activation of
virtually any of the cells of the innate immune system can prevent
transplant tolerance induction. This process is essentially mediated via signaling of various receptors including TLRs (via DAMPS
and PAMPS) and the secretion of several key pro-inammatory
cytokines (primarily IL-1, IL-6, TNF, and type I interferons)
and chemokines. Activated cells of the innate immune system can
prevent tolerogenesis directly via cytokine secretion, activation of
the complement cascade, and killing of donor cells or indirectly
by promoting and amplifying deleterious inammatory adaptive
immune responses while preventing the activation of protective
REFERENCES
Abdi, R., Tran, T. B., Sahagun-Ruiz, A.,
Murphy, P. M., Brenner, B. M., Milford, E. L., and McDermott, D. H.
(2002). Chemokine receptor polymorphism and risk of acute rejection
in human renal transplantation. J.
Am. Soc. Nephrol. 13, 754758.
Abe, M., Wang, Z., de Creus, A.,
and Thomson, A. W. (2005). Plasmacytoid dendritic cell precursors
induce allogeneic T-cell hyporesponsiveness and prolong heart
graft survival. Am. J. Transplant. 5,
18081819.
Adams, A. B., Pearson, T. C., and Larsen,
C. P. (2003a). Heterologous immunity: an overlooked barrier to tolerance. Immunol. Rev. 196, 147160.
Adams, A. B., Williams, M. A., Jones, T.
R., Shirasugi, N., Durham, M. M.,
Kaech, S. M., Wherry, E. J., Onami,
T., Lanier, J. G., Kokko, K. E., Pearson, T. C., Ahmed, R., and Larsen, C.
P. (2003b). Heterologous immunity
provides a potent barrier to transplantation tolerance. J. Clin. Invest.
111, 18871895.
Ahmed, E. B., Wang, T., Daniels, M.,
Alegre, M. L., and Chong, A. S.
(2011a). IL-6 induced by Staphylococcus aureus infection prevents the
induction of skin allograft acceptance in mice. Am. J. Transplant. 11,
936946.
Ahmed, E. B., Daniels, M., Alegre,
M. L., and Chong, A. S. (2011b).
Bacterial infections, alloimmunity,
and transplantation tolerance.
Transplant. Rev. (Orlando) 25,
2735.
Akira, S., and Takeda, K. (2004). Tolllike receptor signalling. Nat. Rev.
Immunol. 4, 499511.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by grants from the MGH ECOR and
NIAID AI066705 grants to Gilles Benichou and NIH U191066705,
PO1HL18646, and ROTRF 313867044 to Joren C. Madsen.
Akira, S., Uematsu, S., and Takeuchi,
O. (2006). Pathogen recognition and
innate immunity. Cell 124, 783801.
Alegre, M. L., and Chong, A. (2009).
Toll-like receptors (TLRs) in transplantation. Front. Biosci. (Elite Ed)
1, 3643.
Alegre, M. L., Goldstein, D. R., and
Chong, A. S. (2008a). Toll-like receptor signaling in transplantation.
Curr. Opin. Organ Transplant. 13,
358365.
Alegre, M. L., Leemans, J., Le Moine, A.,
Florquin, S., De Wilde, V., Chong, A.,
and Goldman, M. (2008b). The multiple facets of toll-like receptors in
transplantation biology. Transplantation 86, 19.
Alvarez-Errico, D., Lessmann, E., and
Rivera, J. (2009). Adapters in the
organization of mast cell signaling.
Immunol. Rev. 232, 195217.
Benichou et al.
www.frontiersin.org
Benichou et al.
Benichou et al.
Hayry, P., Isoniemi, H., Yilmaz, S., Mennander, A., Lemstrom, K., RaisanenSokolowski, A., Koskinen, P., Ustinov, J., Lautenschlager, I., Taskinen, E., Krogerus, L., Aho, P., and
Paavonen, T. (1993). Chronic allograft rejection. Immunol. Rev. 134,
3381.
Herrera, O. B., Golshayan, D., Tibbott,
R., Salcido Ochoa, F., James, M. J.,
Marelli-Berg, F. M., and Lechler, R. I.
(2004). A novel pathway of alloantigen presentation by dendritic cells. J.
Immunol. 173, 48284837.
Holan, V. (1988). Modulation of allotransplantation tolerance induction
by interleukin-1 and interleukin-2. J.
Immunogenet. 15, 331337.
Honjo, K., Xu, X. Y., and Bucy, R.
P. (2000). Heterogeneity of T cell
clones specic for a single indirect alloantigenic epitope (I-Ab/H2Kd54-68) that mediate transplant rejection. Transplantation 70,
15161524.
Hornung, V., Rothenfusser, S., Britsch,
S., Krug, A., Jahrsdrfer, B., Giese,
T., Endres, S., and Hartmann, G.
(2002). Quantitative expression of
toll-like receptor 1-10 mRNA in cellular subsets of human peripheral
blood mononuclear cells and sensitivity to CpG oligodeoxynucleotides.
J. Immunol. 168, 45314537.
Hosenpud, J. D., Mauck, K. A., and
Hogan, K. B. (1997). Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: IgM antibody
responses to donor-specic vascular endothelium. Transplantation 63,
16021606.
Hou, G., Valujskikh, A., Bayer, J.,
Stavitsky, A. B., Metz, C., and
Heeger, P. S. (2001). In vivo
blockade of macrophage migration inhibitory factor prevents skin
graft destruction after indirect
allorecognition. Transplantation 72,
18901897.
Huang, J., Kim, L. J., Mealey, R., Marsh,
H. C., Zhang, Y., Tenner, A. J.,
Connolly, E. S., and Pinsky, D.
J. (1999). Neuronal protection in
stroke by an sLex-glycosylated complement inhibitory protein. Science
285, 595599.
Hutchinson, J. A., Riquelme, P., Sawitzki, B., Tomiuk, S., Miqueu, P.,
Zuhayra, M., Oberg, H. H., Pascher,
A., Lutzen, U., Janssen, U., Broichhausen, C., Renders, L., Thaiss,
F., Scheuermann, E., Henze, E.,
Volk, H. D., Chatenoud, L., Lechler, R. I., Wood, K. J., Kabelitz,
D., Schlitt, H. J., Geissler, E. K.,
and Fandrich, F. (2011). Cutting
Edge: immunological consequences
and trafcking of human regulatory
macrophages administered to renal
www.frontiersin.org
Benichou et al.
properties of TGFbeta-treated
antigen-presenting
cells.
Int.
Immunol. 18, 689699.
Matesic, D., Valujskikh, A., Pearlman, E.,
Higgins, A. W., Gilliam, A. C., and
Heeger, P. S. (1998). Type 2 immune
deviation has differential effects on
alloreactive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.
J. Immunol. 161, 52365244.
Matta, B. M., Castellaneta, A., and
Thomson, A. W. (2010). Tolerogenic
plasmacytoid DC, . Eur. J. Immunol.
40, 26672676.
McCurdy, J. D., Lin, T. J., and Marshall,
J. S. (2001). Toll-like receptor 4mediated activation of murine mast
cells. J. Leukoc. Biol. 70, 977984.
McNerney, M. E., Lee, K. M., Zhou,
P., Molinero, L., Mashayekhi, M.,
Guzior, D., Sattar, H., Kuppireddi,
S., Wang, C. R., Kumar, V., and Alegre, M. L. (2006). Role of natural
killer cell subsets in cardiac allograft rejection. Am. J. Transplant. 6,
505513.
Medzhitov, R. (2001). Toll-like receptors and innate immunity. Nat. Rev.
Immunol. 1, 135145.
Medzhitov, R., and Janeway, C. A.
(2002). Decoding the patterns of self
and nonself by the innate immune
system. Science 296, 298300.
Mempel, M., Voelcker, V., Kllisch, G.,
Plank, C., Rad, R., Gerhard, M.,
Schnopp, C., Fraunberger, P., Walli,
A. K., Ring, J., Abeck, D., and
Ollert, M. (2003). Toll-like receptor
expression in human keratinocytes:
nuclear factor kappaB controlled
gene activation by Staphylococcus
aureus is toll-like receptor 2 but not
toll-like receptor 4 or platelet activating factor receptor dependent. J.
Invest. Dermatol. 121, 13891396.
Mhoyan, A., Wu, G. D., Kakoulidis, T.
P., Que, X., Yolcu, E. S., Cramer, D.
V., and Shirwan, H. (2003). Predominant expression of the Th2 response
in chronic cardiac allograft rejection.
Transpl. Int. 16, 464473.
Miller, D. M., Thornley, T. B., Greiner,
D. L., and Rossini, A. A. (2008).
Viral infection: a potent barrier to
transplantation tolerance. Clin. Dev.
Immunol. 2008, 742810.
Molle, C., Nguyen, M., Flamand, V.,
Renneson, J., Trottein, F., De Wit,
D., Willems, F., Goldman, M., and
Goriely, S. (2007). IL-27 synthesis
induced by TLR ligation critically
depends on IFN regulatory factor 3.
J. Immunol. 178, 76077615.
Mollen, K. P., Anand, R. J., Tsung, A.,
Prince, J. M., Levy, R. M., and Billiar,
T. R. (2006). Emerging paradigm:
toll-like receptor 4-sentinel for the
detection of tissue damage. Shock 26,
430437.
Benichou et al.
www.frontiersin.org
Benichou et al.
Benichou et al.
www.frontiersin.org
Benichou et al.