Steel Magazzine
Steel Magazzine
Steel Magazzine
STEEL CONSTRUCTION
December 2015
tek.la/engineers
Tekla provides a BIM (Building Information Modeling) software that enables engineers to coordinate and deliver the structural
design, fabrication, construction and maintenance of industrial facilities throughout their lifecycle. Using Tekla Structures,
engineers can:
- Create detailed 3D model and design out constructability issues
- Model steel and connections plus concrete and rebar
- Create high quality engineering drawings
- Integrate with analysis software
- Collaborate more closely with contractors / fabricators to speed up construction
December 2015
features
48
in every issue
columns
departments
6 EDITORS NOTE
9 STEEL INTERCHANGE
12 STEEL QUIZ
60 NEWS & EVENTS
66 STRUCTURALLY SOUND
steelwise
resources
64 MARKETPLACE
65 EMPLOYMENT
17
26
Tight Tower
32
38
More or Less
44
48
52
56
Ruin to Rehab
business issues
23
BY WALT GRASSL
Five ways to enhance your creativity
at work by mimicking the successful
behaviors of others.
ON THE COVER: Step inside the Wistar Institutes new Philadelphia facility, p. 26. (Photo: Jeffrey Totaro)
MODERN STEEL CONSTRUCTION (Volume 55, Number 12) ISSN (print) 0026-8445: ISSN (online) 1945-0737. Published monthly by the American Institute of
Steel Construction (AISC), One E. Wacker Dr., Suite 700, Chicago, IL 60601. Subscriptions: Within the U.S.single issues $6.00; 1 year, $44. Outside the U.S.
(Canada and Mexico)single issues $9.00; 1 year $88. Periodicals postage paid at Chicago, IL and at additional mailing offices. Postmaster: Please send address
changes to MODERN STEEL CONSTRUCTION, One East Wacker Dr., Suite 700, Chicago, IL 60601.
DISCLAIMER: AISC does not approve, disapprove, or guarantee the validity or accuracy of any data, claim, or opinion appearing under a byline or obtained or
quoted from an acknowledged source. Opinions are those of the writers and AISC is not responsible for any statement made or opinions expressed in MODERN
STEEL CONSTRUCTION. All rights reserved. Materials may not be reproduced without written permission, except for noncommercial educational purposes
where fewer than 25 photocopies are being reproduced. The AISC and Modern Steel logos are registered trademarks of AISC.
DECEMBER 2015
Structural Software for
Creative Engineers
IES VisualAnalysis
IES, Inc.
800.707.0816
info@iesweb.com
www.iesweb.com
editors note
Editorial Offices
One E. Wacker Dr., Suite 700
Chicago, IL 60601
312.670.2400 tel
Editorial Contacts
EDITOR & PUBLISHER
Scott L. Melnick
312.670.8314
melnick@modernsteel.com
SENIOR EDITOR
Geoff Weisenberger
312.670.8316
weisenberger@modernsteel.com
ASSISTANT EDITOR
Tasha Weiss
312.670.5439
weiss@modernsteel.com
DIRECTOR OF PUBLICATIONS
Keith A. Grubb, S.E., P.E.
312.670.8318
grubb@modernsteel.com
PRODUCTION COORDINATOR
Megan Johnston-Spencer
312.670.5427
johnstonspencer@modernsteel.com
GRAPHIC DESIGN MANAGER
Kristin Hall
312.670.8313
hall@modernsteel.com
AISC Officers
CHAIR
James G. Thompson
VICE CHAIR
David Zalesne
SECRETARY &
GENERAL COUNSEL
David B. Ratterman
PRESIDENT
Roger E. Ferch, P.E.
VICE PRESIDENT AND
CHIEF STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
Charles J. Carter, S.E., P.E., Ph.D.
VICE PRESIDENT
Jacques Cattan
VICE PRESIDENT
John P. Cross, P.E.
VICE PRESIDENT
Scott L. Melnick
Advertising Contact
Account Manager
Louis Gurthet
231.228.2274 tel
231.228.7759 fax
gurthet@modernsteel.com
SCOTT MELNICK
EDITOR
Reprints
Betsy White
The Reprint Outsource, Inc.
717.394.7350
bwhite@reprintoutsource.com
DECEMBER 2015
INTRODUCING THE
HOW/2
DESIGN CONNECTIONS
WITH SDS/2
SERIES BY SDS/2
COMPLETE CONNECTION
DESIGN REPORTS
LEARN MORE
CLASH PREVENTION
SDS/2 checks for interaction with other connections within
a common joint. That means adjusting connections for
shared bolts, checking driving clearances for bolts, sharing,
adjusting and moving gusset and shear plates when required, and assuring erectablity of all members. All adjusted
connections are automatically veried based on selected
design criteria.
INCREASE ACCURACY:
Specify joists and deck electronically in
Revit models.
Save time and money by collaborating
with Vulcraft sales and
engineering services.
BOOST EFFICIENCY:
Coordinate with trades that
LEVERAGING TECHNOLOGY.
CREATING SOLUTIONS.
Autodesk and Revit are registered trademarks or trademarks of Autodesk, Inc., and/or its subsidiaries and/or affiliates in the USA and/or other countries.
steel
interchange
E
F
y
steel interchange
Table 3-2 allows a simplified approach to the design. Though
the two values will provide different results, either can be used
if applied appropriately.
A W1490 has non-compact flanges. Since the flanges are
non-compact, the section is not capable of reaching its plastic
strength and the flanges will buckle locally before a plastic hinge
can be formed. Table 3-2 reports a value that is referred to as Lp
in the Manual discussion. Using this value to calculate Mn, rather
than Lp, will limit the value to the local buckling strength of the
member, Mp. This can be viewed as a shortcut to the Specification
approach, which requires separate checks for lateral-torsional
buckling and compression flange local buckling.
The difference between the two approaches can be seen
most clearly by looking at Manual Figure 3-1 reproduced
below. Using Lp from Equation F2-5 in Equation F2-2 will
produce a result somewhere along the line (Lp, Mp), (Lr, Mr).
Values that exceed Mp are not possible, since Equation F3-1
will govern. This is the approach in the AISC Specification. The
shortcut limits results to those along the line (Lp, Mp), (Lr,
Mr), rendering the explicit check for compression flange local
buckling redundant.
Carlo Lini
Toughness Testing
Are all rolled jumbo sections subject to toughness
requirements? Does Charpy V-notch impact testing have
to be specified in the contract documents, or is this automatically done for all jumbo sections?
First, a clarification: The AISC Specification does not refer to
jumbo shapes. Instead, it refers to rolled and built-up heavy
shapes. ASTM A6/A6M hot-rolled shapes with a flange thickness exceeding 2 in. are considered to be rolled heavy shapes.
Built-up cross sections consisting of plates with a thickness
exceeding 2 in. are considered built-up heavy shapes.
Not all heavy shapes are subject to toughness requirements,
and Charpy V-notch impact testing is typically only performed
when required in the contract documents.
Generally, ASTM standards contain supplemental requirements related to Charpy testing. Testing to other toughness
requirements is also possible. Some materials, like A913, have
toughness requirements in the standard and supplemental
requirements that can apply as well.
10
DECEMBER 2015
The complete collection of Steel Interchange questions and answers is available online.
Find questions and answers related to just about any topic by using our full-text search
capability. Visit Steel Interchange online at www.modernsteel.com.
Larry Muir is director of technical assistance and Carlo Lini is a staff engineertechnical
assistance, both with AISC.
Steel Interchange is a forum to exchange useful and practical professional ideas and
information on all phases of steel building and bridge construction. Opinions and
suggestions are welcome on any subject covered in this magazine.
The opinions expressed in Steel Interchange do not necessarily represent an official position of
the American Institute of Steel Construction and have not been reviewed. It is recognized that the
design of structures is within the scope and expertise of a competent licensed structural engineer,
architect or other licensed professional for the application of principles to a particular structure.
If you have a question or problem that your fellow readers might help you solve, please
forward it to us. At the same time, feel free to respond to any of the questions that you
have read here. Contact Steel Interchange via AISCs Steel Solutions Center:
866.ASK.AISC solutions@aisc.org
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
4USVDUVSBM4UFFM'BCSJDBUJPO
4UFFM1MBUF4IFFU.FUBM
'BCSJDBUJPO
.JTDFMMBOFPVT.FUBMT
.BDIJOJOH
3PMMJOH'PSNJOH4FSWJDFT
$VUUJOH4FSWJDFT
*OEVTUSJBM$PBUJOHT
*OEVTUSJBM&MFDUSJDBM$POUSBDUJOH
$SBOF3FOUBM5SVDLJOH4FSWJDFT
)FBU#FOEJOH4FSWJDFT
"*4$$FSUJmFEGPS.BKPS4UFFM
#SJEHF'BCSJDBUJPO
steel quiz
(O) stands for Observe, (P) stands for Perform and (D)
stands for _________.
a. Daily
c. Document
b. Detect
d. Delay
BENT ON SATISFACTION
11 Bending Machines
Easyway and Hardway: Beams, Tubes, Angles, Tees, Channels, Flats,
Pipe & Rail
Sheet/Plate
Shearing (to x 20), Forming, Rolling (to 1), and Coning
6 Press Brakes
1000 Ton x 30
400 Ton x 23
750 Ton x 24
3-225 Ton x (10, 12, 14)
CNC Machining
Quality
WhiteFabs patented structural bending process minimizes
deformation and provides smoother curvatures. Each bent
section is verified for accuracy along its arc.
Facilities
170,000 sq. ft. of production area, under roof
12
DECEMBER 2015
Phone 205-791-2011
Fax 205-791-0500
E-mail: sales@whitefab.com
Web: www.whitefab.com
HIGH
quality
PLATE
GIRDERS.
CONTACT US TO DISCUSS
YOUR PROJECT
Rich Truxel, Sales Manager
(717) 207-4303 RTruxel@high.net
HIGHSTEEL.COM
1915 Old Philadelphia Pike PO Box 10008
Lancaster, PA 17605-0008
steel quiz
ANSWERS
2 True. The required corner clip sizes of Section D2.4 and I2.4
Seismic Provisions.
2%'-)(5113()3
7)35+)512 !!$*'%!!)((%,)
('# ,'%$+'))$%$) (#$)$#!.
)$$!)"(*'!.)$)%!!)*))$ %
)"%'$))'$"),)'
'!!(#)&$$'#.
''##*"'.$*,$*!! $#)%!!)
,*,(1.:)5+:.)0))*
-!*(+!.'$")$*(',$!)
14
DECEMBER 2015
;!+).%8< $*'%!!'"$+'
" ('"$+#$*'!(+#('
##!+)"%'%'$$)#))
(.#(
%*'%$(!$)($*((
$('%(
!"!"!
.!!
! !!
*'!
! $! !"!" !
"!((
$*()
((!+ /
($#
+10)
%9
/%,.4%.)445.16,44'3)8&1.5'1/
#)&88845.16,44'3)8&1.5'1/
BLASTER
Fully Self-Contained
oceanmachinery.com
7x7>U>`i`>i]]1-UVi>>ViV
CARBIDE DRILLING
5 SECONDS PER HOLE
IN 1 MATERIAL
FULL MACHINING
CAPABILITY
DSTV IMPORT
LAYOUT MARKING
STOCK MATERIAL ON
FINISHED PART OFF
VACAM SOFTWARE
LIVE DIAGNOSTICS
steelwise
Getting a bearing on bearing can help you design
more efficient connections for a variety of steel assemblies.
BEAR IT
AND GRIN
BY LARRY MUIR, P.E.
17
steelwise
The Responsibility
As weve demonstrated, the AISC Specification gives the engineer great power to decide that bearing will exist and therefore eliminate a great deal of the material and labor that would
otherwise have to be incorporated into the joint. Now for the
responsibility part.
In order to transfer loads through bearing, bearing must actually existbut what constitutes bearing? The answer is scattered throughout the AISC Specification and the AISC Code of
Standard Practice (though primarily can be found in Chapter M
of the Specification). AISC Specification Section M2.6 states:
Compression joints that depend on contact bearing as part
of the splice strength shall have the bearing surfaces of individual fabricated pieces prepared by milling, sawing or other
suitable means.
This is a general requirement and is intended to ensure the
surface is relatively straight and smooth. Section M4.4 of the
Specification addresses the required fit of the bearing surfaces, at
least for columns, and states:
Lack of contact bearing not exceeding a gap of 116 in. (2 mm),
regardless of the type of splice used (partial-joint-penetration
groove welded or bolted), is permitted. If the gap exceeds 116 in.
(2 mm), but is equal to or less than in. (6 mm), and if an engineering investigation shows that sufficient contact area does
18
DECEMBER 2015
not exist, the gap shall be packed out with non-tapered steel
shims. Shims need not be other than mild steel, regardless of
the grade of the main material.
The Commentary indicates that tests have shown that
small gaps due to out-of-square can be accommodated without any loss of strength. Section M2.8 of the Specification addresses requirements related to ensuring that the bearing surface of plates is sufficiently flat. Though explicitly addressing
columns, these requirements could form the basis of projectspecific requirements.
Power (and Responsibility) in Action
Lets take a look at some examples, using various scenarios,
of how bearing can improve connections.
Column splices. Figure 2 illustrates a typical column
splice, like those provided in Part 14 of the AISC Manual.
In addition to the AISC Specification requirements, OSHA
1926.756(d) requires these splices to be able to resist the effects of a 300-lb force applied 18 in. off the center of the
column. Engineers also may apply their own more stringent
requirements to account for erection loads, such as designing for some lateral load to account for conditions during
erection. The same concept that results in the 2% of the
compressive demand in Section J1.4 could also be applied
to columns, though again there is no explicit requirement.
The moment strength of the splice can be checked assuming
bearing on the compression side and using the bolts to resist the tension. Though the AISC Specification requirements
explicitly ensure a specified strength, stiffness at the splice is
also critical to ensuring that the column can develop its required strength. In general, joints in bearing can be assumed
to have sufficient stiffness.
steelwise
Truss splices. Often, trusses resist gravity loads such that
the top chord remains in compression. Though engineers often
configure the top and bottom chord splice similarly, half of the
splices can often be economized by taking advantage of compression bearing. Figure 3(a) shows a splice designed to transfer
compression through a bolted splice without bearing. Figure
3(b) provides two alternatives designed to transfer compression
through bearing.
(a)
(b)
20
DECEMBER 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
business issues
Five ways to enhance your creativity at work by
mimicking the successful behaviors of others.
THE ART OF
IMITATION
BY WALT GRASSL
23
business
issues
Find out why our clients are the most loyal in the industry.
www.fabsuite.com
24
DECEMBER 2015
757.645.0842
info@fabsuite.com
The acquisition of the Consolidated Systems, Inc. (CSi) decking business brings new production facilities to our operations,
with enhanced nationwide reach. Make New Millennium your resource for steel joist and deck design, engineering and
supply, including Versa-Dek architectural decking products and Versa-Floor long-span composite oor systems.
TIGHT
Tower
BY EDWARD J. ZINSKI, P.E.
Jeffrey Totaro
DECEMBER 2015
Stackable Functionality
The ideal location for the new tower was determined to be
in the center of the campus, rising out of the surrounding existing research and office buildings. Within the tower, varied functions stacked vertically require the integration of large columnfree spaces with the more closely supported lab spaces. The
structural steel framing system had to efficiently accommodate
long spans, column transfers, hanging columns, two pedestrian
bridges and a variety of cantilevers on all sides, including the
building corners. Also, the lower four floors had to match in
elevation with the adjacent building.
Starting at street level, a 62-ft-wide space for truck entry and
turnaround for the new replacement receiving area is embedded
within the heart of the new tower. The floor immediately above
street level incorporates a new 2,100-sq.-ft multiuse auditorium
with stepped seating, again mandating column-free space that
is offset from the receiving area on the floor below. Above the
Ballinger
Jeffrey Totaro
The structural steel framing system had to accommodate long spans, column transfers, hanging columns,
two pedestrian bridges and a variety of cantilevers.
The new ten-level tower increases Wistars overall footprint to 272,000 sq. ft
and adds 50% more lab space while unifying the institutes campus.
Ballinger
27
Column
hanging
from
Column
hanging
cantilevered
truss.
from cantilevered
truss.
Cantilevered
Cantilevered
floor framing
oor
framing
supported
by
hung column,
supported
by
typical
at
four
hung column,
levels.
typical at
four levels.
28
Ballinger
Jeffrey Totaro
cantilevers as much as 10 ft. At the edge of the cantilevered corridor is a glass curtain wall that acts as a double-skin faade to buffer
the highly controlled environment of the labs from the exterior at
the south faade while allowing natural light to enter the labs.
Within the research labs, vibration resistance that met stringent
National Institutes of Health (NIH) requirements for laboratories
was essential. The design team was able to achieve stiffness and
limit vibration from footfall traffic throughout to a maximum of
2,000 micro-in. per second, while keeping steel member depths to
an absolute minimum through composite action of both the beams
and the girders. Steel framing stiffness was greatly enhanced along
each of the column lines, with the use of creative vertical trusses
hidden within the side walls of the mechanical shafts serving the
labs. These lightweight trusses provided high stiffness to the ends
of the longer span framing members, enabling the use of 16-in.
beams and 18-in. girders to accommodate the intensive laboratory
mechanical and electrical systems above 10-ft. ceilings within 13-ft,
4-in. floor-to-floor heights.
Resisting Vibration
The lab space is the centerpiece of the towers design, with multiple floors of advanced laboratories transforming Wistars research
environment into one of interaction and innovation. The circulation is a continuous loop around the labs, with breakout areas for
spontaneous collaboration, framed with a perimeter corridor that
Urban Constructability
The construction process had to overcome severe constraints associated with an urban site surrounded by multiple
existing buildings and a major street. Steel erection was performed by locating the tower crane within one of the elevator
shafts. With almost no laydown area, steel was picked directly
DECEMBER 2015
Ballinger
Jeffrey Totaro
...and completed.
29
Ballinger
Jeffrey Totaro
the future.
Owner
Wistar Institute
General Contractor
LF Driscoll
Architect and Structural Engineer
Ballinger Architects and Engineers
Steel Team
Fabricator and Detailer
Cives Steel Co.
Erector
Steel Suppliers Erectors, Inc.
30
DECEMBER 2015
Visit www.bentley.com/Structural
to learn more!
2014 Bentley Systems, Incorporated. Bentley, the B Bentley logo, ProjectWise and MicroStation are either registered or unregistered
trademarks or service marks of Bentley Systems, Incorporated or one of its direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiaries. Other brands and product
names are trademarks of their respective owners.
Metal Buildings
Steel/Steel Composite
Aluminum
Reinforced Concrete
Foundation Design
Steel Connections
Structural Drawings and Details
Fluid
AND Flexible
BY CHRISTOPHER E. CAREY, SR.
32
DECEMBER 2015
Arquitectonica
A
CL S R
EA EQ
RA D
N FO
CE R
6 BO
M LT
AX
33
Matters of Location
The escalators located throughout the low-rise, open-air
retail portion of the project could be credited with escalating tension. During the design of the low-rise structures, with
the building elevations and escalator locations in flux, models
arrived late. This required Schuff to incorporate the design
changes on the shop floor without affecting the steel delivery
schedule. Models of the escalators, once imported into the primary master interface model, proved invaluable as a design-assist service to resolve the required steelwork adjustments to integrate the escalators. In spite of the evolving design, the team
was able to meet the schedule.
DECEMBER 2015
Shear Coordination
Another coordination challenge came in the form of the
east hotel buildings shear wall. Due to the location of the steel
trusses used to support the shear wall (90 ft long and 18 ft high)
from level 21 (elevation 259 ft) to level 23 (elevation 279 ft),
the large members (W14605 Grade 65, with the longest piece
35
Owner
Swire Properties
General Contractor
Americaribe Moriarty Joint Venture
Architect
Arquitectonica
Laydown area was at a premium and required load-listing the delivery trucks for
steel to be used that day only.
Structural Engineer
Magnusson Klemencic Associates
Steel Team
Fabricator
Schuff Steel Company
Southeast Division
Erectors
East Tower
Steel City Services, LLC
North and West Towers
Peterson Beckner
Industries, Inc.
Detailer
BDS VirCon
36
DECEMBER 2015
MORE or Less
BY JEFF MARTIN, P.E., TIM HOLTERMANN, S.E., P.E., AND BRUCE BROTHERSEN, P.E.
shear tear-out, a fillet weld placed on the joist chord leg should
not exceed approximately 43 of the chord angle thickness. Using fillet weld thicknesses of 18 in. for K-Series joists, 316 in. for
LH-Series and smaller joist girders and in. for DLH-Series
and larger joist girders will prevent the weld thickness from unnecessarily controlling joist component sizes.
Welding
Lets start with welding, which is one of the more is not
always better scenariosespecially with regard to fillet weld
thickness when welding to steel joists. Steel joists have an excellent strength-to-weight ratio, and the individual components
are relatively thin. A longer, thinner weld is best for joist economy, so as not to force joist components to be thicker simply to
accept the weldment. For a weld placed at the toe of a chord
angle, as shown in Figure 1, the fillet weld thickness cannot
exceed the thickness of the chord angle. To avoid a potential
38
DECEMBER 2015
Figure 2.
in a moderate to heavy wind area could have an uplift end reaction in excess of that bolt capacity.
The joist girder uplift end reaction used to determine the
connection is typically conservative if the summation of the joist
components is used. A reduced joist girder uplift end reaction
can be obtained from the main wind resisting system (MWRS)
analysis. When the loads are greater than what a standard connection can resist, larger-bolt diameters, higher-strength bolts
or even a four-bolt pattern may need to be considered.
The eccentricity induced in a bearing seat connection can
be significant. Ensuring that a joist bearing seat has an adequate
bearing length and proper bearing depth, in order to allow the
end web to intercept with the top chord over the support point,
is essential in reducing eccentricities. Also, the placement of the
connection welds or fasteners needs to be considered for eccentricity. For example, when a joist or joist girder is carrying a
lateral load from wind or seismic, reducing eccentricities should
be considered when specifying a connection. If the load path to
transfer a lateral load from top chord is through the bearing seat,
significant forces due to the induced eccentricities need to be
considered and resisted. When transferring forces from joist to
joist, an additional plate (see Figure 3) virtually eliminates eccentricities. In addition, this type of lateral load transfer detail can
be classified as good, better and best. Figure 3 illustrates this
for joist girder seats when the loads can be very large. Better
is preferred over good because it replaces a difficult overhead
weld with a common fillet weld. Best is preferred over better
because it moves the welds closer to the center of the joist girder.
39
Deck Connections
A key aspect of designing connections for deck is recognizing
that one solution is not best for all situations. A review of the typical design process illustrates how the attachment decisions are made.
The deck design typically includes the selection of a deck
profile and gage that meets the stress and deflection requirements for the out-of-plane (gravity and wind) loads. While not
usually governing, bearing should also be checked.
Deck attachments that meet in-plane seismic or wind lateral
loadsand if applicable, combined lateral and uplift loadsare
then selected. Some of the considerations to evaluate when
specifying an attachment system are:
Ensure selected fasteners are appropriate for the support
member thickness. Coordinate the fastener substrate thickness
requirements with the joist top chord thickness specifications.
Recognize that interlocking deck sidelaps use different
types of connections (proprietary clinched connections, topseam welds, or button-punches) than nested sidelaps (screws,
fillet welds or arc-seam welds). See Figure 4.
Properly consider the effect of connection shear and tension interaction due to combined shear and uplift on the
diaphragm system capacity.
Zone fastening patterns (and deck gages) to match changing
demand across the diaphragm.
Reduce costs through use of nontraditional support fastener
patterns (such as 36/7 at end laps and 36/4 at interior supports), which may meet required strength and stiffness with
significantly fewer fasteners.
Select fasteners that are easy to reliably inspect, such as
proprietary clinched sidelap connections comparable to topseam welds on interlocking sidelaps.
Understand the aesthetics of installed fasteners relative to
the end use of the structureare burn marks or protruding
fastener tips acceptable?
Minimize labor for trades that follow the deck installationfor
example by eliminating the need for interior touch-up painting
40
DECEMBER 2015
phragm resistance are sufficient to comply with any applicable Factory Mutual or UL provisions, which often include
attachment type and spacing requirements.
The final step in the diaphragm design is to ensure that the
number of support attachments at diaphragm chords, struts,
ties or other collector elements that are parallel to the deck
flutes is adequate to develop the full capacity of the diaphragm.
The number of required support attachments is determined
based on the nominal diaphragm shear required and the nominal shear strength of the support fastener. Nominal values are
used for this calculation because the safety and resistance factors typically published for individual fastener strengths are different than those used for diaphragm system strengths.
Connection and/or diaphragm system strength and stiffness
values are available from manufacturers literature and design aids.
Performance of powder actuated fasteners (PAFs) and the proprietary clinched side-lap connections not quantified by recognized
design standards must be determined by testing, using appropriate
statistical analysis of the safety and resistance factors. Most manufacturers obtain product evaluation reports to provide an independent review of the published fastener and/or system performance.
Selecting the best deck fastening system is dictated by considering all of the design requirements (structural and nonstructural)
in conjunction with the installers preferences and capabilities.
There is usually more than one combination of connection type
and pattern or spacing that will achieve a specific design objective.
Sometimes the use of a larger number of connections with lower
individual strength, such as PAFs, is more economical to install
than fewer stronger connections, such as welds. In other situations,
a larger number of connections with a lighter deck is the most economical solution. Providing the design requirements in the design
documents facilitates evaluation of alternate systems. Willingness
to consider solutions can lead to the most cost-effective installation for the owner.
Bridging Connections
While they are not large or cumbersome, connections to maintain the continuity of, or to terminate, horizontal bridging
lines are essential. Horizontal bridging is
considered a two-way system that needs to
extend in both directions from each joist
to a point of anchorage at a wall, beam
or other primary structural element. The
bridging can be terminated with diagonal
bridging that resolves the forces between
the top and bottom chords where anchorage points are not available, or in order to
resolve accumulated forces in a long bay. If
for any reason a horizontal bridging line
must be cut or the continuity is lost, then a
termination needs to be added in the form
of diagonal bridging, as shown in Figure 5.
Shear Connections
If and when shear forces need to be transferred from the deck to the structural load
resisting member, such as a joist girder, these
connections become part of the lateral load resisting system. There are two common methods to transfer shear forces from the deck to
the structural member: roll-over, in which
forces act perpendicular to the joist seat, or
through a shear collector, which is connected
directly from the deck to the structural member. When roll-over forces are specified, the
bearing seats need to be stiffened to resist the
forces. In some cases, a stiffened seat can only
resist 2.0 kips. These types of connections can
be very costly both in the joist seat and the
Fax 801.280.3231
www.corebrace.com
THE PROVEN
STEEL BRIDGE
DESIGN SOLUTION
FREE
15-DAY
TRIAL*
*see website
for details
41
DECEMBER 2015
for Structural
Engineers,
Detailers, Erectors
and Fabricators
200+ exhibitors
3,700 design
and construction professionals
100+ educational seminars
The
PREMIER EVENT
for everyone involved
in the design and
construction of
2016
STEEL-FRAMED
NASCC
THE STEEL CONFERENCE
SYMPOSIUM
www.aisc.org/nascc
REGISTRATION
OPENS
JAN
UP-TEMPO
Bridge
Construction
Accelerated bridge construction practices and benefits
are being recognized and implemented by DOTs
and not a moment too soon, as the stakes are becoming higher than ever.
Courtesy UDOT
DECEMBER 2015
as standard practice. One state, Utah, has adopted programmatic implementation of ABC, and a number of other states are
moving in that direction.
Although sometimes overlooked due to the competitive nature of the transportation industry, construction contractors
can be, and in some states are, significant partners with owner
agencies in moving ABC to standard practice. And contractors
are increasingly supporting the use of ABC principles for a variety of reasons. The improved constructability and cost savings when building multi-span bridges with repetitive elements
is a primary reason. Others include safety concerns for crews
and the traveling public when working in water or over electric
power transmission lines, or working on bridge replacements in
locations with limited site distance or space or high traffic volumes. The ability to minimize work in environmentally sensitive areas also provides an incentive for contractors to consider
ABC technologies even on low-traffic-volume roads.
Prefab is the Key
So how is ABC defined? Perhaps its most widely recognized
characteristic is the use of prefabricated bridge elements and
systems (PBES)and to fully grasp the meaning of ABC, one
must first understand PBES as presently defined. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has provided PBES
definitionssearch PBES at www.fhwa.dot.govthat have
generally been adopted by the SCOBS Technical Committee
for Construction (T-4); SCOBS has designated T-4 as the focal point for ABC implementation among the states. Element
45
Bentley Systems
are currently seeing wide use. They install complete superstructure spans composed of steel or concrete beams pre-topped near
the final bridge location with full-width, full-depth composite
concrete decks. The first installation method uses self-propelled
modular transporters (SPMTs), which are ideal for use on bridge
projects over Interstate highways or other high-traffic volume
roadways. The initiative for widespread use of SPMTs to move
bridge spans in the U.S. began after the 2004 FHWA/AASHTO/
Transportation Research Board (TRB) International Scan on
Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems toured SPMT companies in Belgium and the Netherlands and observed the speed
and flexibility with which bridge spans were being installed with
SPMTs. The Florida Department of Transportation was the first
in the U.S. to use SPMTs to remove and replace spans over a U.S.
Interstate. Taking place in 2006, the project was on Interstate 4
northeast of the city of Orlando and incorporated SPMTs during partial overnight closures of the highway. Since then, scores
of bridge spans have been installed with SPMTs. Another example is the Utah DOTs Sam White Lane Bridge over Interstate
15 in the city of American Fork. This 354-ft long, 77-ft wide,
two-span continuous steel plate-girder superstructurewith a
48 skew and a 1,910-ton self-weightwas moved into position
during an 8-hour overnight road closure in 2011.
Lateral slides using hydraulic jacks or winches. The
second prominent ABC installation method for prefabricated
systems is the lateral slide. This is an ideal technology for hightraffic-volume bridge replacement projects over low-trafficvolume roadways or river crossings. While lateral slides have
been used occasionally over the past decade to move spans
into place, their use has increased significantly since FHWAs
2013-2014 Every Day Counts 2 (EDC-2) slide-in bridge construction initiative focused on this technology. The largest
truss slide to date is the Milton-Madison Bridge on U.S. Route
421 across the Ohio River between the towns of Milton, Ky.,
and Madison, Ind. In 2014 the four 48-ft-wide steel throughtruss river spans, totaling 2,427 ft in length and 15,260 tons in
weight, were slid into place using computer-controlled hydraulic strand jacks. (The project was featured in the August 2014
news section and also in the February 2012 article Move that
Bridge, both available at www.modernsteel.com).
Different Angles on ABC
In addition to PBES, the bridge design and construction
community is taking a multifaceted approach to ABC and exploring and implementing other initiatives as well.
46
DECEMBER 2015
Bentley Systems
Structural Analysis
and Design Software
Steel
d l u b a l. c
www.ssp-muc.com
Picture: Sailer Stepan und Partner
Concrete
www.lackner-raml.at
Picture: Klaura (www.klaura.at)
Timber
ww
w.
al
Tri
Dow
oad Free
nl
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
(267) 702-2815
info-us@dlubal.com
www.dlubal.com
Join us:
February 14-16, 2016
Geotechnical &
Structures Congress
April 13-15, 2016
NASCC
47
STEELING
New Zealand
BY ALISTAIR FUSSELL
ON FEBRUARY 22, 2011, Christchurch was badly damaged by a magnitude 6.3 earthquake, which killed 185 people
and injured thousands of others. The epicenter was 6.2 miles
southeast of Christchurchs central business district at a depth
of just 3.1 miles.
More than 110 of the fatalities were from the collapse of two
multi-story office buildings, and the tremor brought down several buildings previously damaged in the magnitude 7.1 earthquake
from the previous year near Darfield, roughly 30 miles west of
Christchurch. In the central city alone, more than 1,000 buildings have since been demolished, and the estimated capital cost
of both quakes totalled around NZ$40 billion (US$26 billion).
Unsurprisingly, the earthquakes (known as the Canterbury
Earthquakes) highlighted the importance of seismically resilient
building construction, as the cost of repairs and the significant
time to regain building function have clearly resulted in significant economic loss. They have also spurred New Zealand to explore better ways of designing buildings in seismic-prone regions.
It is estimated that the 2011 earthquake, which lasted 10 seconds, exceeded the ultimate limit state design level specified by
the New Zealand seismic loading standard by as much as 100%
over some period ranges. For that reason, the performance of
48
DECEMBER 2015
additional cost of applying low-damage systems in lieu of a conventional approach was just over 0.5% of the total building cost.
Multiple research programs into low-damage steel-framed
seismic-resisting systems are currently underway, or in the
pipeline, at Auckland and Canterbury Universities. (And the
hope is that, consequently, new and even better technologies
will emerge.) Here are some current initiatives:
Braced frames with controlled rocking. These systems
employ rocking and energy dissipaters to resist severe shaking in an earthquake. In New Zealand, the award-winning Te
Puni Village project at Victoria University is a good example
of a braced frame with controlled rocking. It uses springs on
concentrically braced frames and sliding hinge joints on moment-resisting frames; a new 16-story apartment in Wellington
also uses this system. And in Christchurch there is a newly constructed medical center that employs a post-tensioned rocking
braced frame solution as the seismic load-resisting system.
Eccentrically braced frames (EBFs) with removable
links. Seismic energy is dissipated by yielding of the active link
zone between the intersection of the braces and the connector
beam. The removable link features a bolted moment endplate
connection to allow easy on-site removal and replacement after a major earthquake, if required. This technology has been
well researched internationally. At the University of Toronto,
for example, the link was subjected to full-scale testing, where
it successfully demonstrated satisfactory levels of ductility and
an ability to safely contain the damage.
In a first for New Zealand, two new office buildings at 335
Lincoln Road in Christchurch feature bolted eccentrically
braced frame (EBF) links, which, if damaged in an earthquake,
can be easily and cost-effectively replacedmuch like changing
a fuse in a circuit box.
Asymmetric friction connections. The innovative asymmetric friction connection (AFC) is a fully tensioned, slotted
and bolted connection that relies on frictional force between
its components to provide joint strength. The AFC provides a
rigid connection until the design level earthquake is exceeded,
at which point the joint slides, dissipating seismic energy as
friction between the sliding surfaces. After the earthquake, the
only likely structural repair is to replace stretched bolts. To date,
the AFC joint has been used in moment-resisting frames, but
is currently being considered for several building projects in
concentrically braced frame applications.
Linked column frames. The linked column frame is a new
twist on old technology. A hybrid of eccentrically braced frames
(EBFs) and moment-resisting frames, it features linked columns with removable energy-dissipating active links and elastic
moment frames that work to bring the building back to plumb
after an earthquake. This solution provides designers with a
brace-free alternative to EBFs.
Buckling restrained braces. A system that has been used internationally for two decades now but, until recently, has had little
uptake in New Zealand, is the buckling restrained brace (BRB). This
brace behaves consistently in both compression and tension. It is
manufactured with two main components that perform distinct
functions while remaining decoupled: the load-resisting element is a
steel core that is restrained against buckling by an outer casing filled
with grout. In the event they are damaged in a severe earthquake,
they can be easily removed and replaced. Following the Canterbury
49
50
Braced frames with sliding hinge joints have significant postelastic stiffness, encouraging re-centering after an earthquake.
At ground level, 151 Cambridge Terrace is supported by 19 isolation bearings attached to the tops of the concrete columns.
DECEMBER 2015
Christchurch the Steel Citya Blueprint for New Zealand is an SCNZ-produced video that documents steels performance and uptake following the Canterbury earthquakes. You
can view it at http://tinyurl.com/christchurchseismic.
We manufacture ICC-ES
certified BoxBolt for HSS
blind connections.
A K E E S A F E T Y C O M PA N Y
51
Hitting the
SLOPES
BY MICHAEL GRAY, P.ENG., PH.D., J. ERIC KARSH, P.ENG., AND ILANA DANZIG, P.ENG.
Patkau Architects
DECEMBER 2015
53
caption
Cast Connex
ex
onn
tC
Cas
DECEMBER 2015
ural yielding of specially designed cast steel fingers while the brace
member remains predominantly elastic. In addition, the connectors
include cover plates spanning between the arms of the castings on
each side of the device. The cover plates equilibrate the bending
moments that are developed in the yielding fingers on each side of
the connector, which enables a bolted SYC-to-brace connection
that need only be designed for the axial force in the connectorand
also makes the connectors more compact.
The buildings framing configuration resulted in very short
braces relative to the rest of the building. BRBs, which rely
on axial yielding of brace elements, suffer reduced deformation capacity as brace length decreases. This is not the case
with the SYC, as the inelastic deformation capacity of the connector (and subsequent brace assembly) is entirely dictated
by the design of its yielding fingers. As such, using SYCs in
the short braces enabled those members to provide a highly
ductile response to earthquake loading. In addition, one particular frame was originally designed with a chevron bracing
configuration at a very steep angle, which would have reduced
the overall effectiveness of the brace members. Since all of
the brace assemblys ductility is contained within the SYC,
the brace members themselves are not considered a protected
zone (they are merely capacity-designed elements), and as
such, an X brace configuration was developed in which one
brace was segmented and spliced around the other, allowing
the two brace assemblies to behave independently within a
specific deformation range. This reduced the brace angle, increasing the ductile brace assemblys effectiveness in carrying
lateral force through that frame.
Owner
Michael Audain
General Contractor
Axiom Builders
Architect
Patkau Architects
Structural Engineer
Equilibrium Consulting
Erection Engineer
Somerset Engineering Group
Steel Team
Fabricator
George Third and Son
Erector
KWH Constructors
Detailer
Somerset Engineering Group
Castings Manufacturer
Cast Connex Corporation
Building on a Mountain
The fact that the building is located in a heavily forested
flood plain, combined with shipping limitations of British Columbias steep, winding Sea to Sky Highway, meant that the
trusses were shipped to site in pieces, and 90% of the structure
was assembled on-site. As all of the full moment connections
were field bolted, the project required more than 25,000 bolts.
The erection sequence was a significant challenge, especially
due to the long-span longitudinal trusses supported by transverse trusses with large cantilevers. If an element was slightly out
of true, that effect was compounded over the whole structure,
which would potentially result in large deflections. Careful and
thoughtful erection sequencing during construction, along with
adequate shoring, was key for keeping the building within acceptable tolerances. To mitigate some of these issues, structural
engineer Equilibrium Consulting performed a very careful analysis of the cambers required of the steel beams and also allowed
for some tolerance in the concrete topping, ensuring that the
project ended up with a level floor at the end of the day.
Another challenge was the size and irregularity of this project.
Every single truss was different and there was little repetition.
3D modelling was crucial not only during design but also during
construction coordination. Detailed coordination between the
structural Revit model and the architectural Rhino model meant
that many conflicts were found and addressed early in the design
process. Those design models continued to be key during coordination with George Third and Son and the Tekla 3D model that
they developed for shop drawings and fabrication. Using these
models, all parties were able to flag concerns and track progress,
which meant that by the time the steel was erected, most of the
wrinkles had already been ironed out.
When it opens early next year, the Audain Art Museum will
stand as an outwardly simple and elegant building that maintains harmony with its natural surroundings by seemingly floating over the ground, minimizing the disturbance of the local
environment through its minimal supports. It will display an
impressive collection of culturally significant British Columbian art while at the same time concealing an innovative and
Equilibrium Consulting
Patkau Architects
55
Ruin
to
REHAB
BY NABEEL A. IBRAHEEM
Nabeel A. Ibraheem
(nabeelaibraheem@yahoo.com) is a
senior structural engineer with Iraqs
Ministry of Science and Technology and
a current Ph.D. student at the University
of Technology in Baghdad.
56
DECEMBER 2015
57
COLU M NS IN GR EEN AR E
TEM POR AR Y PAR TS OF
SUPPO RTIN G FR AME T O BE
DISM ANT LED LATER
DECEMBER 2015
force of 247 kips (1,100 kN) at each of the two points, slightly less
than predicted by calculations. Following the lift, steel plates were
inserted firmly in the two gaps, and a predesigned connection, using both welding and bolts, was used. At the same time, the damaged columns were dismantled and new ones were fabricated and
erected in place starting at the bottom. When the new columns
reached the remaining portions of the fourth floor columns, the
hydraulic jacks were slowly released, transferring the cumulative
loads from the upper floors (four through seven) into the new
main columns. Afterwards, the remaining damaged steel members
were removed and replaced with new members as necessary.
The structural rehabilitation is now complete, and the build
ing is currently undergoing interior fit-out.
www.aisc.org/nightschool
AISC
Night School
Coming this Winter 2016
Select Topics in Member Design
Presented by Louis F. Geschwindner, P.E., Ph.D.
news
AWARDS
PROJECTS
DECEMBER 2015
news
BRIDGES
NASCC
61
news
PROJECTS
PUBLICATIONS
PUBLICATIONS
62
DECEMBER 2015
Task Committee 12 on Nuclear Facilities Design and an ad hoc subcommittee developed the Supplement, and it is
approved by the AISC Committee on
Specifications. The Supplement has
been incorporated into the standard
and the document is available for free
at www.aisc.org/specifications. A
limited number of printed copies are
available for purchase at www.aisc.org/
bookstore for $12.50 (AISC members)
and $25.00 (nonmembers), plus shipping and handling.
PRIZE BRIDGE
COMPETITION
SUBMISSION
Requirements and entry form available at:
www.steelbridges.org/PrizeBridge
DEADLINE FOR ENTRIES
ELIGIBILITY
All award-winning bridges are built of fabricated
structural steel and are located in the United States
(dened as the 50 states, the District of Columbia,
and all U.S. territories.) Eligible bridges must have
been completed and opened to trafc between
May 1, 2013 and September 30, 2015.
JUDGING CRITERIA
An independent panel will judge entries on the
following criteria: innovation, aesthetics, value,
design and engineering solutions. Quality of
submitted presentations, though not a criterion, is
important. Entries may be judged in more than one
category, but an entry can only receive one award.
AWARD CATEGORIES
marketplace
Contract Auditor
Quality Management Company, LLC is seeking contractors to
conduct audits for the AISC Certied Fabricator and AISC Certied
Erector Programs. Contractors must have knowledge of quality
management practices as well as knowledge of audit principles,
practices and techniques and knowledge of the steel construction
industry. If you are interested, please submit your statement of
interest contractor@qmconline.org.
Are you looking for software, products, or services for your next project?
You can find it in Modern Steel Constructions online product directory.
www.modernsteel.com/products
If youre a provider of software, products, or services and would
like more information about being listed or enhancing your current listing,
contact Louis Gurthet at:
gurthet@modernsteel.com or 231.228.2274
Ficep 2004 DTT CNC Drilling & Thermal Coping Line, 78-3/4 x 24 Max.
Beam, 3-Drill, Ficep Arianna CNC Control, 2003 #20382
Controlled Automation ABL-100-B CNC Flat Bar Detail Line, 143 Ton
Punch, 400 Ton Single Cut Shear, 40 Infeed, 1999 #24216
Controlled Automation 2AT-175 CNC Plate Punch, 175 Ton, 30 x 60
Travel, 1-1/2 Max. Plate, PC CNC, 1996 #23503
Peddinghaus F1170B CNC Plate Punching Machine, 170 Ton, Ext
Tables, Fagor CNC, 30 x 60 Trvl., Triple Gag Head, 2005 #19659
Peddinghaus FPB1500-3E CNC Plate Punch with Plasma, 177 Ton,
Fagor 8025 CNC, 60 Max. Width, 1-1/4 Plate, 1999 #25161
Controlled Automation BT1-1433 CNC Oxy/Plasma Cutting System,
14 x 33, Oxy, (2) Hy-Def 200 Amp Plasma, 2002 #20654
Peddinghaus Ocean Avenger II 1000/1B CNC Beam Drill Line, 40
Max. Beam, 60 Table, Siemens CNC, 2006 #25539
Peddinghaus FDB1500B CNC Plate Drill with Oxy Cutting Torches, 177
Ton, 60 Plate Width, Fagor CNC, (3) Drill Heads, 2001 #25718
www.PrestigeEquipment.com | Ph: +1.631.249.5566
sales@prestigeequipment.com
To advertise, call 231.228.2274 or e-mail gurthet@modernsteel.com.
DECEMBER 2015
Structural Engineers
www.FindYourEngineer.com
www.modernsteel.com/jobs
(Please note that these ads no longer appear at www.aisc.org.)
employment
RECRUITER IN STRUCTURAL MISCELLANEOUS
STEEL FABRICATION
ProCounsel, a member of AISC, can market your skills
and achievements (without identifying you) to any city
or state in the United States. We communicate with
over 3,000 steel fabricators nationwide. The employer
pays the employment fee and the interviewing and
relocation expenses. If youve been thinking of making
a change, now is the time to do it. Our target, for you,
is the right job, in the right location, at the right money.
Buzz Taylor
PROCOUNSEL
Toll free: 866-289-7833 or 214-741-3014
Fax: 214-741-3019
mailbox@procounsel.net
Visit steelTOOLS.org
See whats new at AISCs revampedle-sharing and
information-sharing
website.
Looking for something
from an old issue
of Modern Steel?
Hereofare
a fewfrom
of theModern
FREE resources
now available:
All
thejust
issues
Steel Constructions
first
More
than
160
steelTOOLS
utilities
available
downloading
50 years are now available as free PDFfordownloads
Files posted by your peers in special interest libraries,
at www.modernsteel.com/backissues.
including:
A Pocket Reference to W Shapes by Depth,
then Flange Width
Welding Capacity Calculator
Moments, Shears and Reactions for Continuous Bridges
Video: Bridge Erection at the SeaTac Airport
Got Questions? Got Answers?
Check out steelTOOLS.org.
Purchasing Manager
Company: Macuch Steel Products, Inc.
Location: Augusta, GA
65
structurally
sound
WINTERIZED
STEEL
SKI JUMPERS have been flying high at the Swedish Sports Confederations Lugnet sports complex for four decadesand so has
the steel framing for the facilitys jumps.
The Falun, Sweden, complex includes two ski jumps, designed by Jack Hansson and built for the 1974 World Championships of
Nordic Skiing: the HS 100 normal hill and HS 134 large hill (the numbers refer to the hill size, which is the distance from the takeoff point to the landing line in meters).
The support structure of the larger ski jump consists of two legs built by steel plate welded circumferentially into a tube, with a
lattice structure between the two legs, creating a 174-ft-tall tower (the top of the large hill) that athletes reach via elevator. The normal hill ski jump is supported by two I-beams with crossbars in between and serviced via stairs. The steel used was Domex 355W
weathering steel from SSAB Europe, and a total of 500 tons was used to build both structures.
The facility was renovated in advance of the 2015 World Championships in Nordic Skiing 2015everything but the steel,
that is. Why? Quite simply put, it didnt need to be. Even after 40 years of exposure to Scandinavian winters, the maintenance-free
weathering steel is still performing admirably.
66
DECEMBER 2015
Be part of
the BIM
revolution.
*Free Autodesk software licenses and/or cloud-based services are subject to acceptance of and compliance with the terms and
conditions of the license agreement or terms of service, as applicable, that accompany such software or cloud-based services.
Autodesk, the Autodesk logo, Revit and AutoCAD are registered trademarks or trademarks of Autodesk, Inc., and/or its subsidiaries and/
or affiliates in the USA and/or other countries. All other brand names, product names, or trademarks belong to their respective holders.
Autodesk reserves the right to alter product and services offerings, and specications and pricing at any time without notice, and is not
responsible for typographical or graphical errors that may appear in this document. 2014 Autodesk, Inc. All rights reserved.