Raw Milk Facts
Raw Milk Facts
Raw Milk Facts
For info about the raw milk co-op in Fremont contact: angelzplace@gmail.com
Health Benefits of Raw Milk
MILK PROTEINS: Three dimensional, like tinker toys
CARRIERS: Carry vitamins and minerals through the gut into the blood stream; enh
ance the immune system; protect against disease
IMMUNE DEFENSE: Pasteurization and ultra-pasteurization flatten the three-dimens
ional proteins; the body thinks they are foreign proteins and mounts an immune d
efense.
DISEASES: Immune attacks lead to juvenile diabetes, asthma, allergies and other
disorders later in life
ALLERGIES: More and more people unable to tolerate pasteurized milk; one of the
top eight allergies; some have violent reactions to it.
The Milk Cure
ANCIENT: Since ancient times, an exclusive raw milk diet has been used to cure m
any diseases.
MAYO CLINIC: In the early 1900s, the “Milk Cure” was used at the Mayo clinic to
successfully treat cancer, weight loss, kidney disease, allergies, skin problems
, urinary tract problems, prostate problems, chronic fatigue and many other chro
nic conditions.
ONLY WITH RAW MILK: The Milk Cure only works with raw milk; pasteurized milk doe
s not have these curative powers.
Why is milk pasteurized?
In the 1800s, many US dairies began commercially producing low quality raw milk
in the inner cities of Boston and New York and others. These Brewery dairies wou
ld feed their cows very poor quality "brewer's mash." The resulting milk was ver
y weak and nearly blue from lack of protein, mineral, and fat content. This occu
rred during the Jamaican rum embargo. During this same time period, the dairy in
dustry did not use or have access to refrigeration, stainless steel, milking mac
hines, rubber hoses, hot water, or chlorine as a sanitizer. TB and Brucellosis w
ere rampant (not to mention horse manure on the streets, flies, and lack of publ
ic sanitation and sewage) and the cows were milked by hand without mechanical ma
chines. The cows stood in manure and there was no access to pasture (sounds like
some factory dairy farms of 2005). The resulting unhealthy milk from these sour
ces literally killed millions. The heating of milk to high temperatures reduced
this horrible blight. During this same time period, milk from the countryside ta
ken from pasture grazed healthy and clean cows was the best medicine of the day.
In fact, the Mayo Clinic used this high quality country raw milk as a basis for
many disease curing therapies. This was the untold story of raw milk. Because o
f pasteurization successes, commercial interests prevailed and all dairies (the
good, bad, and the ugly) then began to pool their milk so that "nobody would die
," even if milk quality was very poor. This was great news for milk mass marketi
ng, and creameries created high profits. These pasteurization practices continue
today with the chief benefit being extended shelf life. These modern dead milk
products now cause allergies and lactose intolerance to huge sectors of the popu
lation. Current (PMO) Federal standards for pasteurized milk permit 100,000 bact
eria per ml for milk going to be pasteurized with as many as 20,000 injured or l
iving bacteria to be alive after pasteurization, and this may include pathogens
(this is arguably the reason why milk is pasteurized). California standards for
raw milk require that milk sold for raw consumption have fewer than 15,000 live
bacteria per ml and no pathogens. OPDC averages about 1500 beneficial living bac
teria per ml (and never a human pathogen). For a great book on the subject of mi
lk history, please order "The Untold Story of Milk" by Dr. Ron Schmid ND. It is
available from OPDC. You get the whole story: starting 12,000 years ago, right u
p to and including OPDC in 2003.
Dangers of Pasteurization
Pasteurization destroys enzymes, diminishes vitamin content, denatures fragile m
ilk proteins, destroys vitamins C, B12 and B6, kills beneficial bacteria, promot
es pathogens and is associated with allergies, increased tooth decay, colic in i
nfants, growth problems in children, osteoporosis, arthritis, heart disease and
cancer. Calves fed pasteurized milk do poorly and many die before maturity. Past
eurized milk turns putrid; processors must remove slime and pus from pasteurized
milk before packaging it, by a process of centrifugal clarification. Inspection
of dairy herds for disease is not required for pasteurized milk. Raw milk dairi
es are brutally scrutinized. Pasteurization was instituted in the 1920s to comb
at TB, infant diarrhea, undulant fever and other diseases caused by poor animal
nutrition and dirty production methods. But times have changed and modern stainl
ess steel tanks, milking machines, refrigerated trucks and inspection methods ma
ke pasteurization absolutely unnecessary for public protection. And pasteurizati
on does not always kill the bacteria for Johne’s disease suspected of causing Cr
ohn s disease in humans with which most confinement cows are infected. Much comm
ercial milk is now ultra-pasteurized to get rid of heat-resistant bacteria and g
ive it a longer shelf life. Ultra-pasteurization is a violent process that takes
milk from a chilled temperature to above the boiling point in less than two sec
onds.
What happens to bacteria in pasteurized milk after pasteurization? After paste
urization, bacteria found naturally in milk are killed. During the high temperat
ure heating process, cell bodies of these bacteria are ruptured and their conten
ts are spilled, releasing histamines. This causes many milk drinkers to suffer a
llergic reactions. Almost all of these same consumers can drink raw milk and not
have allergies. The high levels of bacteria permitted in milk intended for past
eurization are still found in pasteurized milk; they are just dead and not remov
ed by the process.
Dangers of Homogenization
The homogenization process destroys the natural butter fat cells found in raw na
tural milk. This process uses extreme pressure to break apart the soft buoyant f
at cells, which cause the remaining small fat pieces to blend into milk and no l
onger float to the top making the cream line. Some European countries have studi
es that show that this process is dangerous and may strongly contribute to heart
disease and arterial plaguing. Our FDA disputes these findings under pressure f
rom the strong dairy lobby. Homogenization is not a required step, but rather a
step of convenience to deny the consumer the ability to see how much cream is ac
tually in the milk they buy.
Dangers of going No-fat!
Average butterfat content from old-fashioned cows at the turn of the century was
over 4% (or more than 50% of calories). Today butterfat comprises less than 3%
(or less than 35% of calories). Worse, consumers have been duped into believing
that low-fat and skim milk products are good for them. Only by marketing low-fat
and skim milk as a health food can the modern dairy industry get rid of its exc
ess poor-quality, low-fat milk from modern high-production herds. Butterfat cont
ains vitamins A and D needed for assimilation of calcium and protein in the wate
r fraction of the milk. Without them protein and calcium are more difficult to u
tilize and possibly toxic. Butterfat is rich in short- and medium chain fatty ac
ids which protect against disease and stimulate the immune system. It contains g
lyco-spingolipids which prevent intestinal distress and conjugated linoleic acid
which has strong anticancer properties.
Powdered skim milk, a source of dangerous oxidized cholesterol and neurotoxic am
ino acids, is added to 1% and 2% milk. Low-fat yogurts and sour creams contain m
ucopolysaccharide slime to give them body. Pale butter from hay-fed cows contain
s colorings to make it look like vitamin-rich butter from grass-fed cows. Bioeng
ineered enzymes are used in large-scale cheese production. Many mass produced ch
eeses contain additives and colorings and imitation cheese products contain vege
table oils.
What are pathogens?
Pathogens are disease causing bacteria and organisms. The three human pathogens
that are tested (state mandated) at OPDC include Listeria Monocytogenes, Salmone
lla, and Ecoli 0157. To date, not one of these pathogens have ever been detected
by any test at OPDC or conducted by any state or federal agency. Tests privatel
y performed at OPDC (BSK labs) showed that even when these pathogens were added
to OPDC raw milk at extremely high levels (7 logs) they would not grow and die o
ff (test results available upon request).
OPDC milk products are highly pathogen resistant. In more than 32 million servin
gs, and more than five years of intensive testing, not one single pathogen has b
een found or detected. Not one person has complained to the state of CA that the
y have become sickened by an OPDC product. Tests performed by UC Davis, Dr. C. B
erge DVM revealed something quite startling: Fresh manure from OPDC cows did not
contain Salmonella. At other dairies tested, many of the findings were positive
(31% of conventional milk tanks tested showed a human pathogen present).
In summary, it has been theorized that the combination of grass feeding, no anti
biotics used, no hormones, and low levels of grain used in diet cause a change i
n the cows immune system and rumen. This change in physiology directly inhibits
pathogen development in the milk (actually a transfer from environmental contami
nation that does not seem to occur; there are no bad bugs in the manure that tra
nsfer into the milk and the clean raw milk is highly pathogen resistant).
What are enzymes?
Enzymes are specialized proteins that assist in the breaking down (hydrolyzing)
and digestion of foods into useful elements that can be utilized, absorbed, or s
tored by the body. Enzymes are identified by the use of the ending "ase" associa
ted with their name. For instance Lipase helps digest lipids (fats). Lactase hel
ps digest lactose sugar (milk sugar). If your body does not produce and have ava
ilable specific enzymes, then you may not be able to utilize certain food source
s, or absorb certain minerals, etc. Phosphatase, which is key to the absorption
of calcium, is inactivated by pasteurization. In fact, the test for effective pa
steurization is called the "negative phosphatase test." Is it no wonder that Ame
ricans are suffering from osteoporosis at a rate higher than ever. It is now con
sidered a US health crisis. A little trick that is not commonly known is that if
you drink plenty of raw milk, lactose intolerant people can then tolerate limit
ed amounts of pasteurized milk products, including ice cream. There is a sharing
of required missing enzymes (lactase) and bacteria that are required in the gut
, making a person not intolerant of lactose containing products.
Built-In Protective Systems in Raw Milk
Consider the calf, born in the muck, which then suckles on its mother’s manure-c
overed teat. How can that calf survive?
Because raw milk contains multiple, redundant systems of bioactive components th
at can reduce or eliminate populations of pathogenic bacteria.
Lactoperoxidase uses small amounts of H2O2 and free radicals to seek out and des
troy bad bacteria In all mammalian secretions—breast milk, tears, etc. Lactope
roxidase levels 10 times higher in goat milk than in breast milk. Other countri
es are looking into using lactoperoxidase instead to pasteurization to ensure sa
fety of commercial milk
Lactoferrin - Steals iron away from pathogens and carries it through the gut wal
l into the blood stream; stimulates the immune system.
Polysaccharides - Encourage the growth of good bacteria in the gut; protect the
gut wall
Medium-Chain Fatty Acids – Disrupt cell walls of bad bacteria; levels so high in
goat milk that the test for the presence of antibiotics had to be changed.
Enzymes – Disrupts bacterial cell walls.
Antibodies - Bind to foreign microbes and prevent them from migrating outside th
e gut; initiate immune response.
White Blood Cells – Produce antibodies against specific bacteria
B-lymphocytes – Kill foreign bacteria; call in other parts of the immune system
Macrophages – Engulf foreign proteins and bacteria
Neutrophils – Kill infected cells; mobilize other parts of the immune system
T-lymphocytes – Multiply if bad bacteria are present; produce immune-strengtheni
ng compounds.
Lysosyme – Kills bacteria by digesting their cell walls.
Hormones & Growth Factors – Stimulate maturation of gut cells; prevents “leaky”
gut.
Mucins – Adhere to bacteria and viruses, preventing those organisms from attachi
ng to the mucosa and causing disease.
Oligosaccharides – Protect other components from being destroyed by stomach acid
s and enzymes; bind to bacteria and prevent them from attaching to the gut linin
g; other functions just being discovered.
B12 Binding Protein – Reduces vitamin B-12 in the colon, which harmful bacteria
need for growth
Bifidus Factor – Promotes growth of Lactobacillum bifidis, a helpful bacteria in
baby’s gut, which helps crowd out dangerous germs
Fibronectin – Increases antimicrobial activity of macrophages and helps to repai
r damaged tissues. (British Journal of Nutrition (2000) 84. Suppl. 1, S3-S10,
S11-S17)
Reports of Food-Borne Illness in Raw Milk
Several reports of pathogens “associated” with raw milk were published in the 19
80s. But these reports failed to isolate the pathogen from the milk itself, or f
ailure to account for other lifestyle variables of the persons becoming ill.
(Mann NR Public Health Reports 2001;103:5)
In the two decades between 1984 and 2002, reports of outbreaks associated with r
aw milk produced in the US are almost non-existent.
Dairy farmers are now managing for bacteria counts of less than 20,000/ml versus
100,000/ml in commercial milk.
Breast Milk Contains Pathogens
MISCONCEPTION: Until recently, the medical profession claimed that breast milk w
as sterile.
PATHOGENS: We now know that breast milk contains pathogens.
PASTEURIZE BREAST MILK? Should mothers be required to pasteurized their own milk
before giving it to their babies?
DISCRIMINATION: Yet laws prevent mothers from obtaining raw milk to feed their b
abies should their own supply be inadequate.
Pasteurized Milk More Hazardous Than Raw Milk
RAW MILK: Incidence of food-borne illness from raw milk – 1.9 cases per 100,000
people, 1973-1992.
(American Journal Public Health Aug 1998, Vol 88., No 8)
PASTEURIZED MILK: Based on CDC website, incidence of food-borne illness from all
foods including pasteurized milk – 4.7 cases per 100,000 people, 1993-1997.
(US Census Bureau 1997 population estimate 267,783,607)
OTHER FOODS: Based on CDC website, incidence of reported food-borne illness from
other foods – 6.4 cases per 100,000 people, per year from 1993-1997.
THEREFORE, the incidence of food-borne illness from consuming raw milk is 2.5 ti
mes lower than the incidence of food-borne illness from consuming pasteurized mi
lk; and 3.5 times lower than the incidence of food-borne illness from consuming
other foods.
Pathogens Can Multiply in Pasteurized Milk and Other Foods But Not in Raw Milk
Campylobacter in chilled raw milk (4o C)
Day 0 = 13,000,000/ml
Day 9 = less than 10/ml
(Doyle, et al. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1982;44(5):1154-58)
Campylobacter in body temperature raw milk (37o C)
Bovine strains decreased by 100 cells/ml in 48 hrs
Poultry strains decreased by 10,000 cells/ml in 48 hrs
(Diker KS. Mikrobiyol Bul 1987 Jul;21(3):200-5)
Note that the protective components work more quickly to reduce levels of pathog
ens in body temperature milk than in chilled milk.