Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Cost of Production: An Example: Important: in This Example I Put Capital (K) On The Horizontal Axis in Dealing With

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 7

University of California, Berkeley

ECON 100A Section 109, 112

Spring 2008

Cost of Production : An Example


What you should get out of this example:
9
9
9

9
9
9

Understand the technical derivation of optimal inputs in Cost Minimization


Able to show the return to scale of a production function
Able to derive various cost functions, including
Total cost
Average cost
Marginal cost
Fixed cost
Variable cost
Able to show that the intersection point between the average cost curve and the
marginal cost curve corresponds to the minimum of average cost.
Understand the differences between long run and short run. Able to derive the short
run production and cost functions.
Realize that total cost and average cost for producing a given level of output are
weakly lower in the long run than in short run, and that the same does not hold in
general for marginal cost.

Important: In this example I put Capital (K) on the horizontal axis; in dealing with
problem sets and exams remember to check if the question directs you to put Labor (L)
on the horizontal axis instead.

You are a newly hired executive at Orange Computers, Inc., the manufacturer of the
highly successful OrangePods. In the production of OrangePods two factors are
usedmachines (K) and workers (L), according to the production function
F ( K , L) = L1 / 2 K 1 / 2 . The current rent for machine is 1 and wage rate is 1. In order to
operate in the State of Nowhere OrangePods has to pay a lump-sum registration tax of 1
(million) dollars.
1. What it the total cost, in terms of K and L?

C ( K , L) = tax + rent machines + wage workers


= 1 + 1 K + 1 L
= 1+ K + L
2. Derive the optimal long run combination of inputs for given amount of OrangePods q
This is an exercise of cost minimization.
F ( K , L) = L1 / 2 K 1 / 2
MPK = 12 L1 / 2 K 1 / 2
MPL = 12 K 1 / 2 L1 / 2
MRTS =

MPK
L
=
MPL K

r
=1
w
MRTS = input price ratio
L
=1
K
L=K

input price ratio =

Substituting L = K into F ( K , L) = L1 / 2 K 1 / 2 gives K LR (q) = L LR (q) = q

3. What returns to scale does Orange Computers production function exhibits?


F (K , L) = (L )

1/ 2

(K )1 / 2

= 1 / 2 L1 / 2 1 / 2 K 1 / 2
= L1 / 2K 1 / 2
= F ( K , L )
So constant returns to scale.

4. Find the long run total cost, long run fixed cost and long run variable cost. Where
does the fixed cost and variable cost come from?
C LR (q) = 1 + K LR (q) + LLR (q)
= 1+ q + q
= 1 + 2q
FC LR = C LR (0) = 1
VC LR (q) = C LR (q) FC LR = 2q
The fixed cost corresponds to the registration tax, while the variable cost corresponds
to the wage and rent paid to raise output by 1 unit.

5.

What is the long run average cost and long run marginal cost? Verify that their
intersection corresponds to the minimum of long run average cost.
AC LR (q ) =

C LR (q) 1
= +2
q
q

MC LR (q ) =

dC LR (q)
=2
dq

Note that AC LR (q ) is always decreasing in


q (you can take its derivative to verify that)
while MC LR (q ) is constant. AC LR (q ) is
always decreasing means that its minimum
is at infinity; the intersection point of AC(q)
and MC(q) is thus at infinity (so strictly
speaking they do not really intersect). We
can verify that this is true:

lim AC (q) =
q

1
+ 2 = 2 = MC (q) = lim MC (q )
q

6. Suppose Orange Computers has been producing 9 (hundred thousand) units of


OrangePods for quite some time, so that it is using the optimal combination of inputs
from above. Demand for OrangePods surged to 12 because it is expected to be out of
production soon. It is too late to order new machines so the executives have decided
to hire more workers. How many workers are needed?
First find the long run optimal K and L. From part 2 we know this is K LR = L LR = 9 .
Now in the short run K K S R is fixed at K LR = 9 , so
F SR ( L) = F (9, L)
= 91 / 2 L1 / 2
= 3L1 / 2
then for any given output level q ,

F SR ( L) = q
3L1 / 2 = q
q
L (q) =
3

SR

Now we have q = 12 , so L = (12 / 3) = 16


2

7. Find the short run total cost, short run fixed cost and short run variable cost. Where
does the fixed cost and variable cost come from?
2

q
We use back the formula LSR = from part 4,
3
C SR (q) = 1 + K SR + LSR (q )
2

FC SR

q
= 1+ 9 +
3
2
q
= 10 +
9
SR
= C (0) = 10

VC (q) = C (q) FC
SR

SR

SR

q
=
3

The fixed cost corresponds to the registration tax and the rent for the 9 units of K.
The variable cost corresponds to the wage paid to increase output by one unit.

8. Derive the short run average cost and short run marginal cost. Verify that their
intersection corresponds to the minimum of short run average cost.
C SR (q )
AC (q ) =
q
SR

10 q 2 90 + q 2
+
=
q 9q
9q

dC SR (q )
dq
2q
=
9
SR
SR
Note that C (q) and AC (q) are both quadratic. You should be able to see that
MC SR (q ) =

q
C SR (q) reaches its minimum at q = 0, since > 0 for all q 0 .
3
For average cost
AC SR (q ) =

10 q 2 10 q
+
=
+ = if q = 0 or q =
q 9q q 9

So there is a minimum in the middle. Find this minimum by differentiation,


dAC SR (q)
=0
dq
10 1
2 + =0
9
q
q = 90
On the other hand the intersection point of AC SR (q ) and MC SR (q ) is
AC SR (q) = MC SR (q)
10 q 2q
+ =
q 9
9
q 2 = 90
q = 90
So the intersection point of short run average cost and short run marginal cost does
corresponds to the minimum of short run average cost.

9. Steven, the CEO of Orange, plans to stay with the combination of inputs in part 4 in
the future. Why would you think this is not the best idea on Earth? What would be a
better plan?
From part 6 the short run total cost in producing 12 units of output is
C SR (12) = 10 + (12 / 3) 2 = 26
While the long run total cost is, referring back to part 3,
C LR (12) = 1 + 2(12) = 25
Since C LR (12) < C SR (12) it is better for the company to use the long run combination
of inputs in the future. From part 2 we know this is (K, L) = (25,25).
In general since the company can adjust all inputs (in this example K and L) in the
long run, the long run total cost is always weakly lower (i.e. either lower or equal)
than the short run total costthe company can always choose the short run input
values in the long run if it wants to. Since AC = TC/q this is also true for average cost.
This is, however, in general not true for marginal cost. Intuitively when the company
has so much input already in place, producing small levels of output could cost very
little marginally in the short run.
10. Verify that the long run total cost curve, average cost curve and marginal cost curve
intersect with their short run counterparts at a certain point. What is the rationale
behind this result?
C LR (q ) = C SR (q )
1 + 2q = 10 +

AC LR (q) = AC SR (q)
1
10 q
+2=
+
q
q 9

q2
9

q 2 18q + 81 = 0

q 2 + 2q + 81 = 0
q=9

( q 9) 2 = 0
q=9
MC LR (q ) = MC SR (q )
2q
9
q=9
2=

So the three sets of cost curves all intersect at q = 9. The rationale is that we get the
short run production function by fixing the short run K to be the optimal long run K
for producing 9 units of output; so when q = 9 the short run production function is
6

identical to the long run production function. Since the production functions are
identical the cost functions have to be identical at q = 9.
The Various Cost Functions

You might also like