IGCSE 0510 Exam
IGCSE 0510 Exam
IGCSE 0510 Exam
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of
the examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not
indicate the details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners meeting before marking began,
which would have considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes must be read in conjunction with the question papers and the report on the
examination.
Cambridge will not enter into discussions or correspondence in connection with these mark schemes.
Cambridge is publishing the mark schemes for the October/November 2011 question papers for most
IGCSE, GCE Advanced Level and Advanced Subsidiary Level syllabuses and some Ordinary Level
syllabuses.
Page 2
Syllabus
0510
Paper
11
Exercise 1 Spider-Man
(a) Malaysia
[1]
[1]
[1]
[1]
[1]
[1]
[Total: 6]
[1]
[1]
[1]
[1]
[1]
[1]
Page 3
Syllabus
0510
Paper
11
Contact details:
i) 077366845
ii) grathorduc@scotnet.org.uk
CIRCLE 2130
coach
Will you require a car park ticket? (please delete as appropriate) DELETE NO
I would like to book the following talk: (please tick ONE only) TICK Scotland in the Twentieth Century
Preferred time of talk (please underline one): UNDERLINE afternoon
Will you require lunch in the cafeteria? (please delete as appropriate) DELETE YES
Max total for Sections A and B: 6 marks
Page 4
Syllabus
0510
Paper
11
Section C
Max total for Section C: 4 marks
Sentence 1 and 2 must be written from the point of view of Peter Wheaton.
Sentence 1: it is expected that candidates will write about wanting to visit the famous castle/walk
around the top of the walls for the magnificent view/see the special exhibition/attend the talk about
Scotland.
Sentence 2: it is expected that candidates will write about the project that they have been doing at
school.
For each sentence, award up to 2 marks as follows:
2 marks:
proper sentence construction; correct spelling, punctuation and grammar; gives the
information asked for
1 mark:
proper sentence construction; 13 errors of punctuation/spelling/grammar (without
obscuring meaning); gives the information asked for
0 marks:
more than 3 errors of punctuation/spelling/grammar; and/or does not give the information
asked for; and/or not a proper sentence; and/or meaning obscure
Absence of a full stop at the end should be considered as 1 punctuation error.
Absence of an upper case letter at the beginning should be considered as 1 punctuation error.
Omission of a word in a sentence should be considered as 1 grammar error.
[Total: 10]
Exercise 4 A world of wonders
Correct responses only apply if they are placed under the correct sub-heading (as detailed below).
Only one mark may be awarded per line.
Add the correct answers to give a total out of 6.
Remember that this exercise is marked for content (reading), not language.
Details of Miyazakis study
Page 5
rooftop garden
rooftop caf
Syllabus
0510
Paper
11
[Total: 6]
Exercise 5 A world of wonders: summary
This exercise is marked for language, not content, but if content is entirely irrelevant to the task, a
mark of zero should be awarded.
Count words and do not mark anything exceeding 70 words, as specified in the question. Candidates
will not be assessed on anything they have written after this limit, but will not be penalised per se for
exceeding it.
0 marks:
meaning obscure because of density of language errors and serious problems with
expression/nothing of relevance
1 mark:
2 marks:
expression limited/reliance on copying out the notes, but some sense of order
3 marks:
expression good, with attempts to group and sequence ideas in own words
4 marks:
expression very good: clear, orderly grouping and sequencing, largely own words
[Total: 4]
Page 6
Syllabus
0510
Paper
11
Page 7
Syllabus
0510
Paper
11
Mark
band
45
Satisfactory:
Relevance: Fulfils the task, with
reasonable attempt at appropriate
register, and some sense of
purpose and audience. A
satisfactory attempt has been made
to address the topic, but there may
be digressions.
Development of ideas: Material is
satisfactorily developed at
appropriate length.
45
Safe:
Style: Mainly simple structures and
vocabulary, sometimes attempting
more sophisticated language.
Accuracy: Meaning is clear, and
work is of a safe, literate standard.
Simple structures are generally
sound, apart from infrequent
spelling errors, which do not
interfere with communication.
Grammatical errors occur when
more sophistication is attempted.
Paragraphs are used but without
coherence or unity.
23
Partly relevant:
Relevance: Partly relevant and
some engagement with the task.
Does not quite fulfil the task,
although there are some positive
qualities. Inappropriate register,
showing insufficient awareness of
purpose and/or audience.
Development of ideas: Supplies
some detail and explanation, but
the effect is incomplete. Some
repetition.
23
Errors intrude:
Style: Simple structures and
vocabulary.
Accuracy: Meaning is sometimes in
doubt. Frequent, distracting errors
hamper precision and slow down
reading. However, these do not
seriously impair communication.
Paragraphs absent or inconsistent.
01
Little relevance:
Limited engagement with task, but
this is mostly hidden by density of
error. Award 1 mark.
No engagement with the task, or
any engagement with task is
completely hidden by density of
error. Award 0 marks. If essay is
completely irrelevant, no mark can
be given for language.
01
Hard to understand:
Multiple types of error in
grammar/spelling/word
usage/punctuation throughout,
which mostly make it difficult to
understand. Occasionally, sense
can be deciphered. Paragraphs
absent or inconsistent. Award 1
mark.
Density of error completely
obscures meaning. Whole sections
impossible to recognise as pieces of
English writing. Paragraphs absent
or inconsistent. Award 0 marks.