LAMM Coaching Manual

Leadership Academy for Middle
Managers (LAMM)
COACHING MANUAL
National Child Welfare Workforce Institute

A Service of the Childrens Bureau, a member of the T/TA Network
September 2013
Acknowledgements
This publication represents a collaborative effort by the partners of the National Child
Welfare Workforce Institute (NCWWI)University at Albany/SUNY, the University of
Denver, Fordham University, University of Iowa, University of Maryland, Michigan State
University, University of Michigan, Portland State University, University of Southern
Maine, and the National Indian Child Welfare Association. Special thanks to Peter Watson,
Director of the National Resource Center for Organizational Improvement, part of the
Children's Bureau Training and Technical Assistance Network, for development support
and consult. Production of the coaching manual was a team effort involving the following
dedicated individuals: Nancy Dickinson, Deborah Reed, Patricia Mosher, and Mark
Preston. We would like to acknowledge the assistance of Nichole Culley for her editorial
support. Thanks also to Sara Munson for final editing and Rea Gibson, Jordan Institute for
Families, UNC Chapel Hill, for her design assistance.
The NCWWI is funded through a Cooperative Agreement with U.S. DHHS, Administration
for Children and Families, Childrens Bureau, Award No. 90CT0145. Special thanks to
Randi Walters, Childrens Bureau Project Officer, for her support.
Principal Author(s)
Patricia Mosher, Leadership Academy for Middle Managers, Consultant/Trainer/Coach

Deborah M. Reed, LCSW, Leadership Academy for Middle Managers, Project Manager,
Portland State University
Nancy S. Dickinson, PhD, National Child Welfare Workforce Institute, Project Director,
University of Maryland
Mark Preston, Leadership Academy for Middle Managers, Consultant/Trainer/Coach
Recommended citation
National Child Welfare Workforce Institute. (2013). Leadership Academy for Middle
Managers (LAMM) coaching manua.. Albany, NY: Author.
For more information
Please visit the NCWWI website at www.ncwwi.org

2013, National Child Welfare Workforce Institute, University at Albany, Albany, NY
The contents of this document are solely the responsibility of the National Child Welfare
Workforce Institute and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Childrens Bureau.
This document may be reproduced in whole or part without restriction as long as the
National Child Welfare Workforce Institute is credited for the work. Upon request, NCWWI
will take appropriate steps to ensure that this publication is made accessible to members of
the community with disabilities.
www.ncwwi.org
A Service of the Children's Bureau, a member of the T/TA Network

September 2013
2
Table of Contents
I.
Introduction to the LAMM Coaching Manual ......................................................... 4

a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
Background and Purpose ............................................................................. 4

Coaching Literature Review .... .5
Definition of Coaching .... 5
Coaching Roles .... .6
Components of Coaching .... 6
II.
Principles and Assumptions of Effective LAMM Coaching .................................... 8
III.
Attributes and Skills of an Effective LAMM Coach ..... ..10
IV.
The LAMM Coaching Framework ..... .13

a. Readiness Coaching for LAMM ....................................................................... 15
b. Residential Coaching ....................................................................................... 16
c. Post-Residential Coaching ............................................................................... 17
V.
Coaching Evaluation Plan ..... ..23
VI.
References ............... 24
VII.
Coaching Toolkit ..... 26

a. Use of Questions in the Coaching Process ....................................................... 26
b. Sample Questions and Domains for Building Leadership Competency
through Coaching ............................................................................................. 30
c. Questions to Explore: Leadership Approaches based on the NCWWI
Leadership Model Principles ........................................................................... 34
d. Description of the Coaching Agreement and LAMM Sample Post-Residential
Coaching Agreement Format ........................................................................... 39
e. Coaching Working Agreement ......................................................................... 41
f. Coaching Session Evaluation ........................................................................... 42
g. Coaching Self-Evaluation Checklist: Coachs Personal Log............................ 43
h. Coaching Case Studies ..................................................................................... 44

www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
3
I.
Introduction to the LAMM Coaching Manual
A. Background and Purpose
Welcome to the LAMM Coaching Manual. The Leadership Academy for Middle Managers
(LAMM) seeks to develop leadership skills for sustainable systems change to improve
outcomes for children, youth, and families. Funded by the Childrens Bureau and part of
the National Child Welfare Workforce Institute (NCWWI), the LAMM facilitates leadership
development of child welfare middle managers across the country who work in public and
tribal child welfare systems and in private agencies that provide services traditionally
provided by state child welfare agencies.
Early on in the implementation of the LAMM, it became evident through experience and
participant feedback that the addition of a full coaching component to the LAMM was
critical for program effectiveness. In order for middle managers to be apply the leadership
skills they learn during the week-long residential LAMM when they return to the
workplace, they need the support that coaching provides. Training is an important
competency driver, but even effective training does not stand alone. Evidence has
documented the added impact of training on transfer of learning when coupled with
coaching (Chaffin, Hecht, Bard, Silovsky & Beasley, 2012; Joyce & Showers, 2002; Miller,
Yahne, Moyers, Martinez & Pirritano, 2004).
In Spring, 2011 the LAMM initiated a comprehensive coaching program for LAMM
participants, consisting of three components: Readiness Coaching, Residential Coaching,
and Post-Residential Coaching. This coaching program was designed to help middle
managers develop, improve, and sustain a Change Initiative (CI) that could be a program-,
organization-, or community-focused intervention benefitting children and families.
Additionally, coaching was implemented in order to facilitate the transfer of learning and
leadership skills associated with the LAMM curriculum.
The intent of the LAMM Coaching Manual is to describe the elements of a successful and
effective LAMM coaching program [This approach could readily be adapted as an executive
coaching program]. This Introduction includes a review of the literature on coaching.
Coaching Principles and Assumptions, in section two, are the standards of effective
coaching practices for LAMM, and their related assumptions or beliefs. There are specific
and necessary Attributes and Skills of an Effective LAMM Coach, which are depicted
in the manuals third section. The fourth section details the Framework for Coaching, or
the actions and steps associated with each stage of the three types of LAMM coaching. The
fifth section is the Evaluation Process, which describes how the coaching program will be
evaluated. The Toolkit, in the manuals final section, is a collection of useful guides,
checklists, and questions that LAMM coaches will find valuable for developing and
deepening their coaching skills.

www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
4
B. Coaching Literature Review
Successful implementation of effective child welfare interventions requires behavior change

on the part of the child welfare workforce. Training is essential, but not sufficient to effect
these behavior changes. And some researchers stress that coaching alone does not bring
about desired changes in behavior, either. Joyce and Showers (2002), as described by
Fixsen, Naoom, Blas, Friedman, & Wallace (2005), contend that training and coaching are
part of a continuum of activities that produce and support behavior change. The authors
describe three attributes of the learning process in support of the need for this continuum of
training and coaching activities. Their arguments resonate with, and are reflected in the
LAMM approach to professional development which includes training and coaching.
I.
II.
III.
Moving from new learner to master practitioner. The LAMM introduces

middle managers to essential components of leadership knowledge and skills. While
participants practice the skills during the residential LAMM, their newly learned
behaviors may feel awkward and forced, similar to a person learning to play tennis
who struggles to put the pieces together into a complex activity called playing
tennis. Coaching helps participants deepen their knowledge and sharpen their
skills in real settings until their new leadership skills become a natural part of their
repertoire of behaviors.
Shoring up skills in the face of pressures. LAMM participants often return to
an agency or state that may not support their new knowledge and skills. These
negative or unsupportive reactions may cause the participant to give up trying to
influence change. Effective residential coaching prepares the participant for these
potential negative reactions, and ongoing post-coaching supports the participant
through the early stages of the implementation of change while the participant
becomes more skilledand more determined.
Linking learning and skills to the participants context. The residential
LAMM offers activities and exercises to help each participant practice the learning
as it may apply in the workplace. A post-coaching relationship can help the
participant translate and apply knowledge and skills from training in the day-to-day
reality of their work, congruent with the organizational context.
In their literature synthesis of implementation research, Fixsen and his colleagues (2005),
draw on studies from a cross-section of human services settings, including health,
education, and mental health to describe components of staff coaching and discuss factors
that may affect coaching outcomes. David Peterson (2011) reviews the business literature to
discuss executive coaching and its definition, processes, and effectiveness. Following is a
synopsis of these reviews and their implications for LAMM coaching.
C. Definition of Coaching
Fixsen and colleagues (2005) do not specifically define what coaching is, but present its
characteristics as being work-based and readily available. Peterson (2011) presents two
definitions which together fit with the LAMM approach, indicating that coaching is a
relationship that facilitates a participant becoming a more skilled and effective leader.
www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
5
In particular, LAMM coaching is a structured process in which a coach uses specific

strategies to help managers become more skilled and effective leaders and better able to
implement sustained change through self-awareness, assessment, and practice.
D. Coaching Roles
While some programs describe supervision and teaching as coaching roles (Spouse, 2001),
the LAMM coach does not have supervisory responsibility and is engaged in teaching only
during the residential LAMM. During post-coaching, the LAMM content is one resource
that a coach uses with a participant to facilitate transfer of learning to the work setting,
but the coach is not teaching or training the content during this time. Other roles that
Spouse (2001) identifies assessment, feedback, and provision of emotional support, do
apply to LAMM coaches. Schoenwald, Sheidow, and Letourneau (2004) caution however
that an overemphasis on emotional support may work against the effectiveness of coaching.
E. Components of Coaching
While research has shown that coaching is important (Fixsen et al., 2005), there has been
no evidence of the effectiveness of specific coaching components and techniques.
Nonetheless, its important to document characteristics of coaching programs. The following
criteria of executive coaching (Peterson, 2011) also apply to the LAMM coaching process.
One-on-one. While there are LAMM group coaching opportunities, the focus of this
manual is on one-to-one coaching activities.
Relationship-based. LAMM coaching that is based on trust, reciprocity, and
rapport leads to a coach-participant relationship through which change occurs.
Methodology-based. As shown in this coaching manual, LAMM coaching draws on
specific actions, tools, and techniques as part of a structured coaching process. Core
to this approach is reinforcing the participants evidence-based skill development
(Fixsen et al., 2005).
Provided by a professional coach. This component speaks to the distinction
between internal coaching provided by supervisors, peers, or human resources staff,
as compared with coaching provided by an outside consultant as in the LAMM
coaching model. External coaches more effectively provide confidential support and
objective help with transfer of learning and skills-based leadership behaviors.
Scheduled in multiple sessions over time. This kind of coaching over time allows
for implementation of action steps and accountability for follow-through. Postcoaching with LAMM participants will typically occur for an hour once or twice a
month.
Goal-oriented for both organizational and individual benefit. Peterson (2011)
states that the goals, values, and expectations of both the participant and the
organization are central to the process (Peterson, 2011, p. 529). The goal of LAMM
coaching is for the participant to be able to transfer learning back to the
organization and apply leadership skills to implementation of a change initiative.
Each participants change initiative is part of the organizations plan for systems
change, so that when the coaching is successful, the organization and the participant
benefit.

www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
6
Customized to the person. A variety of tools and techniques are part of the LAMM
coaching process. The LAMM coach chooses among those tools and techniques, as
well as style of coaching, in order to meet specific needs of the participant at any
given time.
Intended to facilitate self-directed learning by the participant. This aspect of
managerial coaching is a fundamental principle of the LAMM coaching approach. As
Whitmore (2009) notes, Coaching is unlocking a persons potential to maximize
their own performance (p.8-9).
Coaching has been growing in use and significance over the last decade at a pace that is
faster than that of research on its effectiveness. The LAMM coaching program includes
evaluation to assess its impact on the perceived ability of LAMM participants to improve
their ability to transfer learning and leadership skills from the residential LAMM to their
work, and to implement more successfully the change initiatives that are intended to
improve outcomes for children, youth, and families. The latest LAMM evaluation (NCWWI,
2013) found that managers who received coaching and communicated with LAMM peers
reported significantly higher competency gains and were more likely to implement their
change initiative when compared to managers without coaching or peer-support.

www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
7
II. Principles & Assumptions of Effective LAMM

Coaching
The following principles of effective coaching underpin the LAMM coaching program.
Assumptions which support each principle and guide the formation of the LAMM coaching
structure are included.
I.
Effective coaching is driven by the person being coached: self-directed

change lasts longer and is often superior to change designed by others.
LAMM coaching:
II.
Effective coaching facilitates the growth and leadership development of

the LAMM participant. LAMM coaching:
III.
Models deep respect for each individuals own experiences and development.
Helps individuals see their own assumptions and blind spots so they can choose
how to respond to situations.
Helps participants recognize that they have the expertise and resources to solve
many of their own challenges.
Models and supports regenerating practices such as self-care, reflection, and
centering.
Produces a trusting relationship through which meaningful and lasting
reflection, learning, and change can occur.
Supports self-efficacy and self-determination.
Creates a partnership for learning and change.

Integrates the participants leadership development with real experiences.
Encourages participants to take risks and experiment with bold ideas and
strategies designed to meet the whitewater challenges intrinsic to child welfare.
Provides participants time to deepen new knowledge and apply their learning to
the work.
Provides participants the chance to get on the balcony to see possibilities for
change from multiple perspectives.
Provides a space for reflection that, in and of itself, is beneficial to the
participants learning and development.
Effective LAMM coaching supports the development, implementation, and

sustainability of change initiatives to serve children, families, and
communities. LAMM Coaching:
Focuses on proven implementation principles and strategies that promote

sustainability of the participants CI.
Promotes adaptability and responsiveness on the part of participants so they can
navigate the whitewater of change and guide their initiative forward within the
reactive and often crisis-driven context of child welfare.

www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
8
IV.
Promotes consideration and inclusion of diverse perspectives, ideas, and people

to inform successful implementation of the CI.
Helps participants identify ways they can move to action after diverse voices are
heard.
Enables participants to focus on the change initiative and leadership tasks in
service of the greater mission of improving overall system response to children,
youth, and families.
Effective LAMM coaching facilitates participants application of leadership

principles and competencies. LAMM coaching:
Helps participants apply the NCWWI Leadership Model to leadership

challenges.
Supports participants in a unique and valuable way to practice and employ
adaptive strategies for leading change, leading in context, leading people, and
leading for results.
Provides a safe and trusting holding environment, where the political realities
of the day-to-day work can be set aside, allowing the experimentation and risktaking that is often necessary for competent leaders.
Represents an opportunity for middle managers to most freely and without
censorship express thoughts and feelings about him/herself, the organization,
and the larger community.
Helps participants identify and apply leadership competencies to real-life
situations in their work experience.
Summary
These coaching principles and assumptions can foster the development of trust, hope,
compassion, and stability through the coaching relationship. The holding environment
provided by effective coaching helps to foster reflective capacity and growth in the
participant. Individuals who attend to their own growth, development, and centering are, in
turn, more able to guide organizations to meet new challenges in child welfare.

www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
9
III. Attributes and Skills of an Effective LAMM Coach

Effective LAMM coaches should: possess attributes and skills that enable them to engage
LAMM participants in the three types of LAMM coaching; help participants apply newlylearned leadership behaviors to their working environment and change initiatives; and
provide emotional and practical support and professional resources for participants systemchange efforts.
Background
In order to provide effective coaching in the unique and complex environment of child
welfare and support the transfer of learning from the LAMM, LAMM coaches should
possess a graduate social work degree and have experience in child welfare. The necessary
areas of child welfare expertise and experience are:
Current knowledge of the child welfare policy and program context

Knowledge of Federal, State, and Tribal systems
Child welfare workforce development experience
Child welfare management experience
LAMM curriculum content knowledge:
o NCWWI Leadership Model
o Adaptive Leadership
o Implementation science
o Strengths-based leadership
In addition, LAMM coaches must possess and demonstrate a range of coaching skills.
Coaching skills in the context of child welfare leadership include:
Meet ethical standards of coaching

o Is transparent when developing and implementing coaching agreement.
o Accurately represents scope of and limits of own expertise.
o Knows and takes responsibility for dealing with own biases.
o Maintains confidentiality.
Offer content and context knowledge

o Reinforces the leadership competencies identified in the LAMM.
o Links participant experiences and skills to outcomes for children, youth,
families, and communities.
o Provides evidence-based and evidence-informed practice resources relevant to
change initiative.
o Uses LAMM, Child Welfare Information Gateway, and other resources to add
subject-matter expertise when appropriate.
Provide professional development support

o Assists participants in identifying professional development goals.
o Assists managers in using leadership skills, while distributing responsibility
and empowering others.

www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
10
o
o
Supports self-reflection and cultural-humility.

Combines focus on Change Initiative attainment and goals for professional
and organizational growth.
Manage progress and share accountability

o Attends to what is important for the participant.
o Holds participant responsible to develop and implement action plan.
o Follows up on coaching discussion and action plan to track participant progress.
o Models accountability and responsibility by keeping commitments made
during coaching process.
Attributes & Skills
Coaching Intervention Skills
Communicate skillfully
o Clearly conveys information needed for optimal participation in the LAMM
and checks for understanding.
o Uses verbal and nonverbal language for the greatest possible impact on the
participant.
Ask powerful questions

o Is able to ask questions necessary for maximum benefit for the coaching
relationship and the participant.
o Uses solution-focused questions to create reflection and self-awareness.
o Links questions to the goals of the coaching process.
Seek clarity
o Checks assumptions.
o Paraphrases and reflects to increase understanding.
o Seeks to understand the context in which the participant operates.
Give advice when requested

o Gives advice that invites consideration, not compliance.
o Gives advice sparingly and in order to meet the long-term goals and interests
of the participant.
Offer feedback
o Links feedback to both the process of the work and its outcomes.
o Gives feedback that is timely, specific, and linked to behavior and its
consequences.
Use reflective practice

o Helps participants see gaps between intentions, actions, and results.
o Helps participants reflect on connections between actions, meanings, and
purposes.
o Promotes cultural responsiveness, sensitivity, and humility.

www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
11
Interpersonal Competencies
Use empathy and rapport to develop effective coaching relationships

o Employs language and approaches that convey respect and encouragement.
o Help participants develop strengths in their own contexts.
Display different levels of listening

o Uses active listening skills to attend to and show respect for participants.
o Listens for patterns in thinking and behaving relevant to leadership efficacy.
o Listens to hear vision, possibility, emerging patterns, and purpose.
Respect individualization
o Responds to individual learning styles, cultures, and experiences.
o Matches questions and actions to the timing and pacing of participants.
o Is flexible in coaching style and structure to meet the needs of participants.
Maintain professional demeanor

o Models the skills being trained and coached through LAMM.
o Prepares for coaching sessions by reviewing change initiative, previous notes,
and action plan.
o Demonstrates commitment by following through on agreements and insuring
that coaching needs are met.

www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
12
IV. The LAMM Coaching Framework

The Leadership Academy for Middle Managers has created a continuum of learning and
transfer-support activities, beginning with each participants initial contacts with the
LAMM project staff and faculty, and continuing through the professional development
process and implementation of a sustainable change initiative. These activities form the
LAMM coach framework.
A. Readiness Coaching for LAMM
State, agency, and tribal leaders nominate LAMM participants and identify specific change
initiatives which each participant will use in application activities during the residential
LAMM. In submitting the change initiative (CI) description, each participant begins the
process of preparing for development of leadership skills. At the same time, LAMM coaches
use the CI and feedback from the Childrens Bureau about each initiative to help
participants prepare for the residential LAMM, determine the stage of implementation for
each initiative, and assess their agencys investment in leadership development and
support for implementation of the CI.
This careful review of each CI supports participants in the readiness process and ensures
that the CI is appropriate for use in the LAMM. These CI reviews also inform the initial
coaching intervention. For example, one participant may be coached on ways to develop
more focus related to a broad initiative, while another may be encouraged to consider his or
her role in implementation of the CI.
First Readiness Coaching Call
The LAMM coachs first contact with a participant involves two primary tasks: (a)
introduction to the residential LAMM and (b) initial contracting for the readiness coaching
work. Following an introductory email, LAMM coaches engage managers on a phone call
with a brief welcome and orientation. (See Toolkit for outline.)
During this first call, relationships begin to form between participants and coaches, as
expectations for the residential LAMM are clarified and strengthened. Coaches also provide
each participant with an overview of the residential LAMM, describing the NCWWI
Leadership Model as the framework for participants development as leaders. The first
readiness coaching call helps participants to envision themselves at the residential LAMM
and mentally plan for that week away from jobs and families. Importantly, the conversation
invites participants to think of themselves as leaders.
Second Readiness Coaching Call
The content of the second call is more substantive than that of the first call. By this time,
participants should have completed the following activities:
View the online Introductory Module.

Complete the pre-test self-assessment from the NCWWI Evaluation Team.

www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
13
Receive the book Strengths-Based Leadership and complete the StrengthsFinder

Inventory.
Complete the Change Initiative Worksheet.
Download the training handouts and PowerPoint files to a laptop to bring to the
LAMM training.
The Change Initiative Worksheet prompts discussion between coach and participants
about the current state of the initiative and gives the participants a chance to identify any
additional information they may need to bring to the residential LAMM. This can include
clarification of expectations from their state or tribal leadership, information from their
implementation team, data and outcomes, or simply the chance to understand more deeply
their own role in the process. The worksheet is also designed to give the participants and
their coach a way to discuss how organizational and community readiness can be deepened
during the CI implementation phase.
Readiness Coaching Steps: First and Second Calls
First Readiness Coaching Call
Second Readiness Coaching Call
Step 1
Shared introductions of person, context,

and roles; Check in regarding logistics.
Centering together: Reconnection.
Step 2
Introduction to LAMM:
Verbal description of process,
including the two calls, residential
portion, and available posttraining coaching.
Review Action Plan:

Readiness checklist.
Discuss and resolve any concerns
or questions related to the
checklist and readiness.
Resolve any pressing logistics
questions.
Step 3
Discuss expectations prior to residential

LAMM:
Online Introductory Module.
Strengths-Based Leadership.
Optional: University of Kansas
Data Course.
Worksheet due to coach prior to
second call.
Materials to download for
residential training.
Contacts with PSU team for logistics.
Review CI Worksheet:
Discuss responses.
Identify areas that participant wants
to deepen and link to relevant
modules in the LAMM.
Identify areas for potential onsite
coaching and link to onsite Subject
Matter Experts.
Discuss the residential week with a
focus on building the CI and
preparing for the presentation
work.

www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
14
Step 4
Action Planning:
Seek additional information or
clarity from agency in order to
complete CI worksheet.
Use any feedback from Childrens
Bureau to help prepare
worksheet.
Set time for second call.
Set deadline for sending
worksheet before second call.
Action Planning:
Identify any lingering work to be
completed prior to the residential
LAMM.
Discuss plan for dinner the night of
arrival.
Share contact information should
any barriers or questions arise.
Step 5
Reflect and see if there are any additional

needs.
Reflect and see if there are any additional

needs.
The Coaching Bridge to Readiness for Residential Learning
Throughout the readiness coaching, participants begin to anticipate particular topics and
sessions that will help them with some of the challenges they are likely to face as they
develop and implement their CI. Helping participants anchor their questions in specific
LAMM content also prepares them for the work ahead, both during the residential LAMM
and afterwards when they return to their organizations.
The coaching teams commitment to share the first evenings meal with their coaching
group provides participants a structured way to network with each other, setting up a
positive group interaction and providing a sense of community, which are some of the goals
for the residential LAMM. Coaches may also encourage participants to seek coaching ahead
of time, particularly in specific subject matter that may be relevant and useful to an
individual or team. This prompt to use onsite coaching encourages the expectation that
participants will access some individual or small-group time outside of the set curriculum.
Coaches meet prior to the opening residential session and share information about the
groups themes, strengths, and needs. Because all the trainers are residential coaches, this
sharing process helps anchor the curriculum in real life examples. The sharing also
promotes strategic planning regarding how best to work with a given cohort. For example,
each individual CI captures current child welfare information about the array of
implementation stages across all the CIs. There will likely be themes that lend themselves
to extra attention and coaching support during the week. It is common, for example, for
several initiatives to be challenged to incorporate family and community voices. It is also
common that several systems--including states, private agencies, and tribes--are grappling
with how to gain buy-in and support from new leadership or from external resources.
In sum, the readiness coaching phase of the LAMM coaching continuum serves a critical
purpose in preparing LAMM participants and their agencies for the work ahead, a pretraining preparation process that has been shown to promote transfer of learning back on
the job (Franke, 2008). LAMM trainer-coaches benefit as well, since the information they
www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
15
learn from participants informs the training content and promotes early engagement with
participants. The fortunate result is a more open, collaborative, and productive learning
environment for coaches and participants alike.
B. Residential Coaching
The primary purpose of coaching during the residential LAMM is to provide support for
learning and applying specific LAMM skills to practice in the field and to plan for CI
implementation. Residential coaching also helps participants prepare for the end-of-theweek presentations to small groups. The following are features of the LAMM onsite
coaching:
Subject matter coaching. Onsite coaches include experts with specific subject
matter expertise and experience, including family voice trainers, Tribal child welfare
coaches, representatives from the National Child Welfare Workforce Institute, and
other LAMM project staff. In the introductory session, all available coaches are
introduced, and participants are strongly encouraged to sign up for or seek out
coaching with them throughout the week.
Coaching related to units within the curriculum. Trainer-coaches help
participants think through applications of the curriculum to their CIs and next steps
for their work.
Small group and team coaching. Any small group can request team coaching.
Examples include teams who are sent by agencies to work collaboratively on their
initiatives. Other groups are sent by organizations and tribes to work together,
although they have different initiatives.
Presentation consultation and technical assistance. Coaching is available in
an open house approach one evening during the academy to assist participants in
developing their presentations, practicing their presentations, and using technology.
LAMM residential coaching occurs throughout the training day, at mealtimes, during
breaks, and in the evening. The hour-long sessions generally follow a similar progression,
although with vastly different content. Since there is not necessarily an action-planning
component to residential coaching, the coaching more often resembles consultation than
other LAMM coaching options.
Steps for Residential Coaching Session
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Shared introductions, person, context, and roles.

Participant-led framing of the coaching consultation
Why this coach may be helpful.
What this coach may offer.
Which aspect of the CI will be the focus.
Discussion of topic and context of the CI
Questions to identify relevant drivers and stage of implementation.
Questions to identify patterns and help participants get on the balcony.

www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
16
Step 4
Questions and brainstorming to generate application of LAMM course

material and subject matter to the CI.
Referrals to other resources to assist with moving forward.
Reflect and see if there are any additional needs.
As in the readiness coaching, trainer-coaches often consult with each other and share
themes or trends noted during their coaching sessions. A daily debrief provides
opportunities to anchor the training examples within the groups experience, if there is
permission from participants to share these examples within the training context.
C. Post-Residential Coaching
Post-residential coaching supports the transfer of leadership competencies from the

residential academy to the work setting. Further, it facilitates the successful
implementation of participants change initiatives. Ongoing post-residential coaching is
optional and is available for participants through telephone interactions.
Small-group coaching by phone or webinar is offered periodically. LAMM staff, trainers,
coaches, and participants determine topics of interest. Groups of peers from across multiple
LAMM cohorts discuss topics with a coach or trainer.
All post-residential coaching is self-directed and anchored in the tenets of the NCWWI
Leadership Model.
Post-Residential Coaching Approach
When a LAMM coach and participant consider working together, they determine
parameters, principles, and assumptions about the coaching process prior to making an
agreement to work together. The parameters include:
Time and duration of the coaching sessions

Methods for contacting each other and scheduling sessions
Documentation and evaluation components
The documentation and evaluation components of coaching elicit information from

participants and coaches to enhance the effectiveness of LAMM coaching, not to evaluate
the managers work. Specifically, the coach documents when coaching occurs and identifies
the implementation stage of the CI. In addition, coaches may identify trends or themes in
facilitators of change and in barriers to implementation that LAMM participants may face.
This information, along with participant assessments, will help to evaluate whether
coaching helps LAMM participants apply their knowledge and skills from training to
implementation of their CIs and to their leadership behaviors at work.
The LAMM coach emphasizes that the coaching content will be determined by the
participant, reflecting a fundamental principle of self-directed learning referenced earlier.
Also important is the coachs commitment to confidentiality.

www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
17
As the working agreement for coaching proceeds, a natural rhythm develops between coach
and participant, which then takes into account any unique variations as they arise. For
that reason, while the following description provides a typical picture of coaching
conversations over time, specific sessions may incorporate elements from any other phase of
coaching as needed.
Beginning Phase of Coaching: Initial Engagement
Step I. The initial engagement work of coaching begins with shared introductions by the
coach and participant, covering information about themselves and hopes for their work
together. At this step, the participant uses experiences from the residential LAMM and
their return from the classroom to the workplace as the context for coaching. This
conversation includes a review of the work accomplished in the residential LAMM and a
transparent and open conversation about what role coaching could play in supporting the
participants application of the learning to implementation of the CI and strengthening of
leadership skills.
Step II. The participant and coach develop their working agreement, which establishes the
parameters of the coaching process, with an emphasis on making the sessions useful and
participant-driven. The coach may clarify how coaching differs from mentoring, therapy, or
supervision. The coach may also share the LAMM Coaching Philosophy and Assumptions,
as well as the Coaching Framework. The coach and participant also agree on how work will
be done in the coming months, such as the timing, duration, and content of the coaching
calls. Some coaches and participants, for example, may schedule all of their appointments
in that initial call, while others prefer to make those plans month-by-month.
The coach sets the tone and pace of the coaching work to be done. In developing the working
agreement, the coach may offer suggestions for making sure the environment is conducive
to reflection and planning. Suggestions may include: having doors closed in both offices,
turning off phones and computers, and spending a minute in the beginning of each call to
acknowledge being present together and ready to focus on the coaching conversation. The
coach will also acknowledge taking notes during the coaching conversations in order to
maintain focus and continuity between sessions. These, together with participant
suggestions, become the working agreement.
The coach will describe the evaluation process and assure the confidentiality of their
coaching conversations.
This engagement stage will be most effective when the coach and the participant have
considered how coaching could specifically benefit the participant. It is helpful for the
participant to review their LAMM work prior to the first session and for the coach to
prepare by reviewing the participants CI. It can also be helpful for each one to review the
participants presentation documents or slides from the LAMM session.
Step III. The process at this point is one of beginning the work, so this part of the first
coaching session may involve reflections by the participant on their transition home, with a
shorter discussion of the actual work that will occur in future sessions. The coach may ask
www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
18
for an update on the participants CI. Participants often use the first session to prepare for
meetings or assignments that are related to their CI, while the coach explores
implementation stages and drivers and Adaptive Leadership skills that may be helpful in
these activities. A discussion of the participants strengths might be helpful, as might
talking about which quadrants of the NCWWI Leadership Model are most important to the
participant at this beginning coaching stage. Focusing on specific LAMM content that
might be useful for current responsibilities helps the participant reflect on their experiences
in the residential LAMM and identify specific skills the participant could transfer to the
workplace at this time.
The coach should ask simple, basic questions to help the participant set the context of their
work and the challenges they face. For example, the coach may ask the participant for an
organizational chart or a verbal description of the current organizational environment.
Understanding the participants work environment informs the coaching work.
Step IV. The next step in coaching is for the participant to develop an action plan that will
guide the work during the coming month. In assisting with the development of the action
plan, the coach restates the goal of the coaching, whether it is help with implementation of
the CI or with challenges that arise in the participants leadership roles. With that
understanding, the participant is asked what specific and measurable actions she or he can
take toward reaching this goal. The participant will then specify the action step(s) he or she
will take over time and what will be completed before the second coaching call.
Step V. The coach gains the commitment of the participant to work on the action plan by
asking some of the following questions:
What action(s) are you willing to commit to?
When will you start? For how long?
How can I hold you accountable?
When can we follow up on your progress?
How will we measure your progress?
Who can give you feedback on how you are doing with your plan?
Step VI. At the end of the coaching session, the coaching pair reflects on the session,
reviewing both their work together and the action plan. The evaluation of the training
process occurs through the following specific questions, which are also listed in the Toolkit
and Evaluation sections of this manual:
What worked and what could be done differently related to the coaching
relationship?
What worked and what could be done differently related to the coaching results?
What worked and what could be done differently related to the process of
coaching?
Throughout the coaching process, the effective coach employs critical skills of deep
listening, reflection, powerful questioning, and appropriate feedback in order to engage the
participants active involvement in the process. Deep and intentional listening includes
being able to completely focus on the participant, listen for what isnt being said, and allow
room for emotions and silence. The Toolkit contains examples of these skills. During the
www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
19
engagement phase especially, the coachs ability to hear, and truly listen to, the
participants world view and experiences as a leader helps to build a trusting relationship
through which change can occur over time.
Middle Phase of Coaching: Productive Coaching
Productive Coaching can last from a few weeks to several months. Although regular
ongoing sessions are scheduled, the coach may also be available to the participant for crisis
consultation or updates. The focus during this phase is on the cycle of planning, doing,
assessing, and revising the action plan for CI implementation and leadership skills
reinforcement. Coaches are sounding boards, resources, and witnesses to the evolution of
the leader as well as the CI.
Coaches would do well to constantly integrate the language and competencies of the
NCWWI Leadership Model into their work with participants in order to be consistent with
the leadership skills and change initiatives that are the primary focus of the coaching. In
addition, self-care becomes an important value the coach can add to the conversation.
Step I. At the beginning of each session, the coach and the participant take a moment to
center together, closing office doors, turning off computers, taking a deep breath, and
beginning to focus on the coaching session at hand. Effective coaches use pacing, breathing,
and questions to create a relaxed and open environment.
Step II. Moving from Centering to Reflection is a critical skill to model across all sessions.
Reflection is a necessary antidote to the crisis-driven and reactive world of child welfare. In
this step of the coaching process, the coaching skill of reflection is used to begin the
evaluative process of sharing what has worked and what has not been effective during
previous coaching sessions. Often, at the end of coaching, the participant may not want to
give the coach constructive feedback about what could have been different. Checking in
early during each session, however, can provide insight into the coaching needs of each
individual.
Step III. Coach and participant go over the action step(s) accomplished, or not, since the
last session. Usually the focus is on the CI, or other actions when a political, organizational,
or community crisis has occurred. Helping Middle Managers thrive in the whitewater of
their work is one of the most important components of coaching. The coaching role at this
point is to help the participant step off the dance floor and evaluate their experiences from
multiple perspectives.
Step IV. After looking backwards, the coaching focus turns to current challenges and
opportunities brought up by the participant. The process of using past learning to develop
the next plan is a thoughtful and effective approach to leading change. In addition to
reviewing skills from the NCWWI Leadership Model, the coach may review implementation
models to offer drivers that can best support the CI, or update the logic model to fit the
reality to which the participant returned after the residential LAMM. Often the challenges
of managing up, down, and sideways will fill up the coaching conversation and lead to an
action plan building on the strengths of the participant.
www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
20
The value of this productive phase of coaching is to help an emerging leader develop his or
her own process for working through CI implementation and other leadership challenges.
Step V. The coaching process must be results- as well as process-driven. For this reason,
near the end of each coaching session, the coach should summarize the sessions content
and help the participant identify action steps and expected outcomes that will occur before
the next coaching session. Reflective listening, summarizing, and using open-ended
questions will help the participant focus on what is achievable during the interim period.
An action plan can include actions that relate to leading change and implementing the CI,
as well as personal development. For example, a participant may identify an upcoming
meeting whose goal is to increase the family voice. There will be tasks involved in this
meeting that call for the participants leadership skills, such as bringing individuals
representing family voice into the building, introducing them to professional team
members, and creating an open, respectful, and structured environment that will equalize
power differentials and increase the likelihood that family voice will be heard. The
leadership skills required for this meeting may be the target of this coaching session,
including deciding when to orchestrate conflict and how to regulate distress.
Coaching during this productive phase, when the coach and participant know each other
well, allows the exploration not only of implementing change and sustaining the CI but also
the planning of self-care, the regenerative aspect of coaching which creates the energy
required to move forward.
Step VI. The coaching session closes with reflection on the current session and
commitment by the participant to work on the chosen action steps. This verbal
commitment increases the probability that the participant will accomplish these actions.
Coaching questions to gain commitment include:
What are you willing to commit to? Starting when? For what duration?
How will you track your progress?
How will you hold yourself accountable to work on this action?
Who can give you feedback on how you are doing with this action step?
Evaluating each coaching session gives the participant a chance to reflect on results,
relationship, and the process of coaching. Questions about what worked and what could be
improved model the coachs openness to feedback. The coach may reciprocate with feedback
on what went well, based on what the participant has done well in the session. Giving the
participant positive and behavioral feedback helps to build the participants strengths, and
it allows the coach to model the type of feedback that would help the coach be more
effective. The coach might say, for example, I asked you about the response you got from
your supervisor, but I could also have asked you what you wanted from your supervisor,
before asking what you got. I wonder if that would have been more helpful. By showing
that the coach is reflective about his/her coaching practices, the conversation focuses on
helpful processes and effective results.
After the call, the coach has a chance to self-assess using the self-evaluation tool found in
the Evaluation section of this manual. Having a structured way to think about effective
www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
21
coaching helps each person grow and notice patterns about what is needed within each
coaching relationship and across groups of participants.
Ending, Stage I: Preparing for the End of Coaching
Coaching ends when the allotted time for the coaching work is coming to a close, or when
the participant feels that the goals of the coaching process have been accomplished.
Effective termination strategies apply in coaching as well as in other practices. A good
farewell can be the beginning of a new stage for the middle manager.
Once the end of coaching approaches, it is important to begin talking about how to sustain
the progress of skill development and change leadership that has been the focus of
coaching. It may be helpful for the coach to use implementation drivers to determine
resources that can sustain the CI as it moves from innovation to sustainability. The
sustainability plan may also be used to identify internal and community supports that will
help the middle manager. As in earlier phases, planning for self-care remains important.
The end of coaching is both a celebration and a loss. As a trusted confidants role comes to
an end, the participant may find obvious successors to listen and provide a holding
sanctuary for them in the context of their leadership role. As the pair prepares for the final
coaching session, a recommended intersession activity is to identify what has been learned
during their work together and develop a sustainability plan to ensure that work on the CI
and leadership goals can be maintained.
Ending, Stage 2: Completing Coaching
The final coaching session begins like all others: centering and reconnecting in Step I, and
reflecting on the coaching process during Step II, which may continue throughout the
session. A final check-in and review of progress in leadership behaviors and with the CI, as
well as plans for sustainability during Steps III and IV, allow both coach and participant
to identify what they have accomplished together.
Coaches should prepare for the final session by identifying specific changes and progress
the participant has made. Feedback is most effective when it addresses both personal and
organizational progress, linking leadership skills to the results that were identified in
coaching sessions.
Coaches may offer their ongoing availability for participants to touch base and learn of
resources available through NCWWI and the LAMM. A review of the sustainability plan for
the person and the project provides a benchmark for both parties.
In Step VI, coach and participant identify closing thoughts and feelings and celebrate the
work they accomplished together. Completing a final assessment of the coaching process
helps the coach learn and grow as a coach and helps the program learn how the coaching
contributed to the important work of change in order to best serve children, youth, families,
and communities.

www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
22
V.
Coaching Evaluation Plan
Evaluation of the LAMM coaching program focuses on its effectiveness in helping LAMM
participants transfer their learning from the residential LAMM to the workplace and use
leadership skills in implementing CIs. Program feedback provides the data necessary for
continuous improvement of the coaching process and its outcomes.
LAMM coaches evaluate themselves using the Self-Evaluation Worksheet (see Toolkit) in an
ongoing process to track their development and to identify the relevant skills that are
useful to the LAMM coaching process.

www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
23
VI. References
Barbee, A. P., Christensen, D., Antle, B., Wandersman, A., & Cahn, K. (2011). Successful
adoption and implementation of a comprehensive casework practice model in a
public child welfare agency: Application of the Getting to Outcomes (GTO) model.
Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 622-633.
Chaffin, M., Hecht, D., Bard, D., Silovsky, J. F., & Beasley, W. H. (2012). A statewide trial
of the SafeCare home-based services model with parents in child protective services.
Pediatrics, 129, 509-515.
Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blas, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005).
Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of
South Florida.
Franke, T., Bagdasaryan, S., & Furman, W. (2008). Transfer of learning (TOL) in child
welfare. Research Brief 1. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Department of social Welfare,
Inter-University Consortium.
Heifetz, R., & Linsky, M. (2002). Leadership on the line: Staying alive through the dangers
of leading. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Heifetz,R,Grashow,A,& Linsky,M. (2009). The Practice of Adaptive Leadership
Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (2002). Student achievement through staff development (3rd Ed.).
Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
McManus, P. 2006. Coaching People: Expert Solutions to Everyday Challenges published
by Harvard Business School Press.
Miller, W. R., Yahne, C. E., Moyers, T. B., Martinez, J., & Pirritano, M. (2004). A
randomized trial of methods to help clinicians learn motivational interviewing.
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(6), 1050-1062.
National Child Welfare Workforce Institute. (2013). Leadership academy for middle
managers spring 2013 evaluation report. Albany, NY: Author.
Peterson, D.B. (2011). Executive coaching: A critical review and recommendations for
advancing the practice. In S. Zedeck, (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and
organizational psychology, Vol. 2: Selecting and developing members for the
organization. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 527-566.
Ryan, J. (2006). Inclusive leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Schoenwald, S.K., Sheidow, A.J., & Letourneau, E.J. (2004). Toward effective quality
assurance in evidence-based practice: Links between expert consultation, therapist
www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
24
fidelity, and child outcomes. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology,
33(1), 94-104.
Sholomskas, D. E., Syracuse-Siewert, G., Rounsaville, B. J., Ball, S. A., Nuro, K. F., &
Carroll, K. M. (2005). We dont train in vain: A dissemination trial of three
strategies of training clinicians in cognitive-behavioral therapy. Journal of
Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(1), 106-115.
Spillane, J. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Spouse, J. (2001). Workplace learning: pre-registration students' perspectives. Nurse
Education in Practice; 1: 149-156. Issue, Journal for Advanced Nursing.
Stoltzfus,T. (2008). Coaching Questions: A Coachs Guide to Powerful Asking Skills.
Whitmore, J. (2009). Coaching for performance (4th ed.). GROWing human potential and
purpose (people skills for professionals). Boston: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.

www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
25
VII. Coaching Toolkit

A. Use of Questions in the Coaching Process
LAMM coaches use powerful questions to elicit problem-solving and critical thinking on the
part of participants. The coach employs reflective questioning and exploration to help the
participant integrate the principles and competencies of LAMM into their skill sets and CI
implementation.
Coaching questions take many forms and often are part of current evidence-based and
evidence-informed practices in child welfare, such as solutions-focused interventions (Insloo
Kim Berg, 1994), motivational interviewing (Miller and Rollnick, 2002), and self-directed
learning (Goleman,1998, 2004). Coaching practices in executive and life coaching also
emphasize questions as the key to developing effective coaching. The sample questions in
this toolkit are built around the NCWWI Leadership Model. Because the model is a familiar
framework to participants from the residential LAMM, the questions will be familiar to
participants and more likely to promote the application of leadership skills to the workplace
and the implementation of change initiatives.
In the book, Coaching Questions: A Coachs Guide to Powerful Asking Skills, author and
coach Tony Stoltzfus (2008 pg. 8-9) answers the relevant question, Why Ask? as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
All the information is with the participant.

Asking creates buy in.
Asking empowers.
Asking develops leadership capacity.
Asking creates authenticity.
Types of Questions
The types of questions a LAMM coach will use will depend on the purpose of the coaching
moment and include the following:
Open Ended Questions
Open ended questions seek various types of information, such as descriptions, ideas, and
opinions. Open ended questions:
Cannot be answered with yes, no, a name or number.
Are designed to expand understanding on the part of the coach and include
questions that help the coach understand the initiative, the organization, the
community, and the leader.
Expand understanding on the part of the participant.
Are answered in ways that convey the perspective, strengths, and analysis of the
participant.

www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
26
Solution Defining Questions

Solution-defining questions are also open-ended but are specifically designed to help
participants define patterns. Although the name of these questions may sound as if they
refer to solutions that participants have tried, solution-defining questions are as likely to be
related to successes as to times when things went wrong. The point of this type of question
is to unearth cause and effect patterns so that future strategies can repeat patterns with
good results and avert those with negative results. Two opposite-sounding questions that,
when combined, get at a solution in coaching include:
Think of/tell me about a time when you were able to get a group at your organization
to try something new.
Think of/tell me about a time when the organization asked people to try something
new, but it didnt work.
Both questions help the coach and the participant identify some markers of successful
intervention and build or define elements of good solution building.
Exception Finding Questions
Exception-finding questions are useful when the participant begins to describe a dynamic
about which she/he has little optimism. For example, a participant may be coping with a
leadership team that rushes to action before considering alternatives, or may be trying to
motivate an experienced and possibly entrenched supervisory group. The coach may try to
unearth some potential strategies around a seemingly dead end approach through seeking
exceptions:
Think of a time when the leadership group did something around policy
implementation that surprised you: what was it, and how might it help you think
through this situation?
Think of a time when the supervisory group got energized about a new opportunity,
resource, or practice: what was it, and what happened?
A specific type of solution-defining question, exceptions help participants question their
limiting beliefs about the way we do things around here and find a path for innovation.
Past Successes
Building on past successes keeps adaptation moving forward. The tenets of Adaptive
Leadership stress using previously successful approaches, adapted to current context, to
advance the effectiveness and viability of the organization (Heifetz, Grashow & Linsky,
2009). Past successes anchor coaching in organizational and participant strengths.
Examples of questions about past successes include:
What was the biggest change you have seen in child welfare practice within your
organization, and how did the organization make that change happen?
Think of a time when you and your organization collaborated well with families and
communities. What was that effort, and how did the collaboration get going? What
were the important factors that brought people together?

www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
27
Think of what your stakeholders would say is similar about this initiative to
initiatives in the past. What would they say were successful features of other
initiatives, and how can you use that information to further this one?
Scaling Questions
Scaling questions invite people to rate or score their current reality. The real value of the
scaling question however, is the follow up questions which promote success. Scaling
questions may be particularly useful when participants feel stuck or discouraged. Examples
include:
On a scale of 1 to 10, 1 being Not at All and 10 being Extremely, how confident are
you that this initiative will continue to go forward in your organization? What would
it take to move that number up towards increased confidence on your part?
Choosing between Not at All, Somewhat, and Extremely, how committed is your
workforce to making this initiative work? What do you think they would need from
you to improve their rating?
Coping Questions
Coping questions get at past strategies for success in a slightly different way. They are
questions designed to build upon the inner resources of the person or the organization that
have proved adaptive in the past. For example, most child welfare organizations have
experienced years of cutbacks, years when new administrations resulted in a decrease in
public advocacy for children and families, and years where economic hardship and political
factors put programs in jeopardy. Finding out how individuals and organizations coped or
survived can help the participant tailor her/his approach to the current situation. Examples
include:
(Organizationally) How has your agency coped in times of cutbacks before? Are there
any strategies you could bring forward to ensure that your initiative survives?
(Personally) Thinking about other times when you had a new administration and a
change in leadership, what did you personally do to join the new team and promote
or continue projects? How did others cope?
Future Vision or Miracle Questions
Future vision or miracle questions remind people of the end-goal that is driving the
initiative, as well as positioning the participant to look forward to reaching that goal. They
focus on ultimate achievement:
Lets imagine that you are done with this initiative, that this is now the way we
do things around here in your organization/community. What does this look like?
How would you know?
Or, the question can be focused on a specific timeframe that helps the participant identify
the next steps in a foreseeable future:
Six months from now, lets imagine things are right on track and implementation
is going smoothly. What are some of the ways you would know, and what are
some of the things that would be different?
www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
28
Working back from a miracle, whether it be long or midterm, helps the participant identify
what would need to change and, by extension, prioritize and identify some helpful steps to
take to attain the desired state.
Summary
Peter Senge (1994, 1999) described questions as critical for growth and change. In thinking
about the work of the military, Senge described the After Action Review process which
consists simply of three questions:
1. What happened?
2. What did we do?
3. What did we learn?
Questions are most effective when they arise out of genuine curiosity and are
individualized. While this coaching manual toolkit contains examples of useful questions,
those questions will be most helpful when they are generated through dialogue and
appreciation of the participants context and reality. These are the kinds of questions that
spark insight and reflection and thus guide participant success.

www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
29
B. Sample Questions and Domains for Building Leadership

Competency through Coaching
The competencies of the NCWWI Leadership Model are useful in the LAMM coaching
process. This toolkit offers coaches a wide range of questions related to each of the
quadrants, or domains within the leadership role, as well as the pillars, or leadership
principles. Within each of the following sections, coaches will find a definition of each
quadrant and pillar, along with related questions to stimulate dialogue about leadership
development and implementation of the CI.

www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
30
Questions Related to Quadrants of the Leadership Model

1. Leading Change: This quadrant reflects the strategic task of the leader to set and
realize high standards of organizational performance. Competencies of leading change
emphasize an action mind-set, the ability to plan strategically, and the capacity to envision
new responses to organizational, political, and social challenges. Questions will help
participants explore these skills of leading change.
Competency
Creativity and
Innovation
External Awareness
Flexibility
Strategic Thinking
Vision
Questions
What are some of the most out of the box ideas you have had and heard
related to your initiative? How might those ideas be put into practice?
Who are some of the creative people in your organization and community
to whom you turn when you need a problem solved? How can they help
you think of new solutions?
Thinking about the political context in which you work, are there people or
drivers you need to engage in order to move forward? Who/what are they
and what would their interest in this work be?
Looking back at the information about LAMM related to [Drivers or
Adaptive Leadership principles], what are the important next tasks needed
to advance this initiative?
What are some practices or beliefs about practice that you are being
asked to give up in order to make this change?
How have you been able to adjust your plan based on emerging realities
and unintended consequences?
Based on what you just described, what do you think the best next step
should be?
What are some specific next steps that your [leadership, workgroup, staff]
could take to further implementation?
What have you thought about in terms of getting key stakeholders to
share in ownership of the vision for this initiative?
How could you include new voices to expand the current thinking on this
initiative?
2. Leading in Context (Building Collaboratives): The role of the leader in this

quadrant is to build collaborative relationships both internally and externally to achieve
common goals. This involves politically-savvy advocacy, partnering with the community,
and using influencing and negotiating skills to build consensus to accomplish goals.
Competency
Partnering

www.ncwwi.org
Questions
How might you apply the LAMM information about using family voice in your
initiative?
Who are some community members with a lot at stake as your initiative
moves forward? What are your thoughts about engaging them in the process
now?
What community partners could help with resources that you believe could
enhance the implementation of this initiative?

September 2013
31
Political Savvy
Influencing/
Negotiating
Who are the greatest partners within your organization and how can their
strengths be deployed for implementation?
What community partners and stakeholders can move this initiative forward
with appropriate federal agencies, state and local governments, and tribal
organizations?
Who are the advocates that seem able to have their voices heard? What is
their role in your work on this initiative?
What are some of the Whats In It for Me? elements to your initiative that
you can use to influence the involvement of others?
Which other agencies or tribes will you need to persuade in order to
accomplish the goals of this initiative?
Which businesses or groups outside of Child Welfare may also be trying to
influence or reach the same people that you are? Can you negotiate an
agreement with them to join with you on this initiative to further both of your
goals?
Who is your organization competing with for time, attention, and/or
resources? Can you influence others to join together on this initiative to
maximize joint span of influence and resources?
3. Leading People: The focus of this quadrant is on leading people toward meeting the
organizations vision, mission and goals. The process of developing individuals and groups
within the organization emphasizes relationships, teamwork, cultural responsiveness, and
resolving conflicts.
Competency
Questions
Developing Others
Conflict Management
Team Building
Cultural
Responsiveness

www.ncwwi.org
What professional development opportunities are available to others related

to your initiative?
What are the attributes and skills of people who would contribute to the
implementation and sustainability of your initiative?
How will you use the idea of champions and coaching within the
organization to implement your initiative?
How will you bring forward dissenting voices to explore all aspects of the
initiative and its implementation?
What steps will you take to prevent counter-productive confrontations?
How have you created a shared vision to build the involvement of
organizational teams in the initiative?
Which team relationships do you need to strengthen for implementation and
sustainability?
How will different entities and functions within the organization interact to
ensure that the organization is learning from working together?
What culturally-responsive features are in your initiative?
How will you use different worldviews to influence the development and
implementation of the initiative?
How will the initiative contribute to an agency environment in which cultural
and other differences are appreciated?

September 2013
32
4. Leading for Results: Meeting organizational goals requires the leadership ability to
make decisions that produce high-quality results. Leadership at all levels is needed to
encourage evidence-informed practice and to build the capacity to improve system
outcomes.
Competency
Questions
Accountability
Capacity Building
Service Orientation

www.ncwwi.org
How have you used your logic model to implement the change initiative
and hold yourself and your team accountable for results?
What do the data tell you about this aspect of the work?
How are you measuring the results you think you see? Are those results
compatible with your objectives?
How has your information technology team helped with measurement of
the initiatives impact?
What systems are in place to measure the important links between the
agency practice and outcomes for children and families? Looking at the
drivers for implementation, how are you assessing the ability of the
agencys infrastructure to support implementation of the change initiative?
What are some of the evidence-based/informed practices you have
considered?
What mechanism will you use to align the drivers for continuous feedback
to support this initiative? How will you engage in quality assurance and
fidelity during implementation so the initiative delivers high-quality services?

September 2013
33
C. Questions to Explore: Leadership Approaches based on the

NCWWI Leadership Model Principles
A central value the coaching process offers is using questions to help people think about
and explore their role in leading change. In the NCWWI Leadership Model, five leadership
principles form the pillars upon which leaders rely to inform their actions. The following
questions are linked to the competencies within each pillar and are designed to spur
thinking and actions that may assist the participant in both exploring and applying new
perspectives and actions.
A. Adaptive Leadership (Heifitz & Linsky, 2002)
Adaptive Leadership supports the ability of a leader to adapt to and lead change so that
organizations can thrive. Adaptation requires that organizations build upon what has
worked in the past, while being willing to give up practices that no longer work and adopt
promising new practices. Competencies of adaptive leadership practices and related
coaching questions include:
1. Challenges own and other peoples habits, beliefs, and values
Challenges Self:
What are some of the practices and beliefs you hold most dear, and how might
this initiative push you to challenge them?
What assumptions and beliefs of yours could hold you back in leading this
initiative?
Where do you get support while working through your own internal conflicts
or debates about the new initiative?
Challenges Others:
How do you think you can invite your (workgroup, organization, leaders) to
question their own habits, beliefs, or values in order to adapt to todays
opportunities and challenges?
What might people be afraid of losing during this implementation process and
the change it represents?
What are some of the beliefs you think might block adoption of this new
initiative? How could you elicit information and dialogue about that?
2. Emphasizes a strategic/innovation mindset:
When you think about getting an organization to change, what has worked
best in the past with your organization and workforce?
What would motivate your stakeholders to support this initiative?
What practices do you think the organization would be most willing to change
first?
3. Works with differences:
What could do to create an environment where different perspectives are
welcomed and heard?
What different viewpoints that youve heard will help you move forward?
www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
34
How can you use your role to enhance productive sharing of different but
legitimate perspectives?
4. Orchestrates positive conflict:

What important debates will you need to facilitate so that change moves
forward?
How will you keep the key stakeholders engaged through the difficult
conversations about resolving different perspectives when they are so
passionate about their points of view?
What has worked to bring the group to a point of honest dialogue in the past?
5. Inspires others to challenge decision-making processes:
How has your organization made decisions in the past? What has worked well?
What are the power differentials and how will you acknowledge and work
with those in order to facilitate hearing all voices?
What are some of the assumptions about the way things are that you would
like to ask people to question?
6. Navigates changeable environments:
How have things changed since we last talked?
What has surprised you since we last talked, and how did you respond?
What are some of the moving parts impacting your work that you want us to
keep in mind during coaching?
B. Inclusive Leadership (Ryan, 2006)
Inclusive Leadership actively involves all stakeholders in the design and oversight of
change. Coaching can assist in promoting inclusive practices at all levels of the organization
by reminding leaders to think about who is not in the room or at the table to help move an
innovation forward. Competencies and questions to promote inclusive practices include:
1. Advocates for a full range of diverse participation in the process
Who are all of the people affected by this initiative, and what could you do to gain
their voice, perspective, and support as you move forward?
Who on your team would need persuading in order to include a wider range of
participants in development of the initiative?
How can you get the right people around the table to make this work?
2. Promotes leadership as a collective process
How can others step into leadership roles with you?
How can you best use the strengths of those on your team?
3. Creates a sense of urgency around inclusion
On a scale of one-to-ten, how ready is your organization to include
family/community voices? How will this become a priority?
What will happen if you develop the program before getting input? How might
this impact implementation?
www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
35
4. Acknowledges disparities and seeks to mitigate them

How could you incorporate strategies to address disparities while implementing
your initiative?
5. Engages in continuous learning about inclusion
What does your initiative offer others in terms of ongoing learning about inclusion?
How can you and other leaders use this initiative to keep learning about
disparities in power, resources, and voice?
6. Engages diverse stakeholders
Thinking about the groups you have put together, where do you see some hot
spots in terms of differing perspectives and potential conflicts? How can you
prepare to use that information to make sure different perspectives are respected?
What would it take for the organization to seek more diversity in moving this
implementation forward?
What would it take to get diverse stakeholders to participate?
C. Distributive Leadership (Spillane, 2006)
Distributive Leadership, as discussed by James Spillane in relation to education, proposes
that leadership is not equivalent to the role of one person, but rather is an outgrowth of the
interaction of different people and functions within an organization.
Leadership, using the distributive model, is encouraged and enacted at all organizational
levels. The following competencies and questions can help participants consider ways to
distribute leadership across the internal and external stakeholders related to a change
initiative or to leading change:
1. Distributes decision-making and leadership responsibilities
What are the decisions and leadership opportunities available at each level in
your organization during the CI implementation?
What are some empowering practices you and your implementation team can use
to increase ownership of the CI process and results in the organization and
community?
2. Manages human, cultural, social, and economic capital
Using the Strengths Finder assessment, what are the best roles for people on your
leadership team to play?
How can you use your strengths to maximize the resources you have to work with?
3. Encourages purposeful action
What is your step-by-step plan for moving forward with implementation of your
change initiative?
How can you work within the organizational and political timeframe and still
protect the need to be thoughtful and plan-full?
What are the aspects of this change that require the most thought? Who is paying
attention to these factors?
www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
36
4. Promotes collective rather than individual action

Who else should you include as part of your action team?
What are the benefits of including others at this point?
What group actions will move things forward?
D. Collaborative Leadership
Collaborative Leadership skills further the emphasis a leader places on community
engagement and create a mandate for community ownership of the child welfare challenge.
The collaborative approach means working in new ways with community partners, building
new partnerships, and creating community readiness to support the ongoing needs of
families after the CI is completed. Building relationships, partnerships, and collaborative
work outside of the agency can be linked to the following competencies, and is promoted
with the following questions:
1. Creates opportunities for collaboration outside the agency
How can you collaborate with those outside the agency to advance your goals?
With whom do you already collaborate? Can these collaborations be expanded
related to your initiative?
Which advocates outside of your agency can help you advance this process?
2. Encourages exchange of information and sharing/pooling of resources
How can you share information and pool resources with the community?
What are some necessary resources the community can help provide?
Who has information that you want and need to help advance your cause?
3. Focuses on common purposes
What are some common goals that you and other community partners share that
are related to your change initiative?
Whose interests are also going to be met by successful implementation? Are these
people at the table?
4. Stresses process rather than product
Thinking back to the conversation at LAMM where we discussed power over,
power for, and power with, is there anyone you are exercising power for right now
who might be more involved if you changed that relationship to power with?
What elements of your implementation process have the most potential to
positively impact organizational functioning? How can you build on them?
5. Has an action orientation
What will it take to move your change initiative forward?
What will it take to get your organization to move ahead with this plan?
Where do you think the CI will most likely get stuck? What will you do when that
happens?

www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
37
E. Outcome-focused Leadership
In order to determine the best implementation and sustainability strategies, leaders must
always keep their focus on desired outcomes and results for children, youth, families, and
communities. The following outcome-focused competencies and questions for leading change
include:
1. Applies technical knowledge
What assets do you have in terms of knowledge, skills, and experiences that would
help the team solve technical and practical challenges?
What is your role in terms of getting to desired outcomes?
What is the organizations technical ability to achieve the results you want?
2. Analyzes problems
Where are the gaps between current performance and what you want to see in
implementation? Are the gaps related to the implementation work we did in the
residential LAMM:
o Knowledge to practice gap
o Vision to reality gap
o Fidelity gap
What data will help you identify potential barriers, challenges, or gaps?
How can you use multiple perspectives from the Leadership Model to analyze
problems that impact results?
3. Uses data to inform decisions
What data drive the decisions you will make?
Do your current data challenge your deeply held beliefs and values and those
within your organization and the community?
How will you find the right data to help you with the decision before you?
4. Focuses on indicators leading to outcomes of safety, permanency, and wellbeing
How do, staff connect their work to these critical outcomes for children and
families?
How will you attend to the data on critical outcomes while the organization is in a
period of transition?
Which critical outcomes are you seeking to improve through your CI, and how will
you track these outcomes?
5. Stresses results rather than processes
What are the results that matter in your initiative?
How will you move people past processes to focus on results?
What results might move people to let go of favorite but ineffective practices?

www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
38
D. Description of the Coaching Agreement and LAMM Sample PostResidential Coaching Agreement Format
The Coaching agreement is part of post-residential coaching, with some of the same
approaches from the pre-residential coaching. For example, the coach will continue to work
with the participant on leadership development and the development, implementation, and
sustainability of the CI. In addition, the intent of the coaching moves from preparing for
best use of LAMM to preparing for application of LAMM in the workplace.
As a result, even if the same coach worked with the same participant before and during
LAMM, it is important to develop agreement about the process and outcomes of postcoaching. Below are descriptions of each of the four aspects for building a working
agreement related to coaching, along with sample questions or concepts designed to ensure
that the coach and participant are in agreement about what they are going to do during
their work together.
1. Introduction of the Coach and the Parameters of Coaching
Number and frequency of coaching sessions: One session per month, for six
months, by phone, with the availability of other coaching calls when you want an
additional check in.
Confidentiality: Our conversations are confidential, with the exception that I will
report that we had a coaching call and may share general information which
helps us enhance the LAMM program.
Reporting function that the coach provides to LAMM for tracking purposes.
General Agenda: Describe the agenda based on the phases of coaching.
It is important that you, as the participant, own the coaching process.
There will be a period of reflection at the end of each of our calls, when I will ask
you what worked and what you would like to see improved related to:
o Relationship: how we are doing in terms of my ability to provide a
supportive and comfortable climate for our conversations.
o Process: what you think of the coaching process in relation to your goals.
o Results: how you think we are doing in terms of getting you closer to your
goals for the coaching experience.
There is an evaluation process, where you will be asked for feedback on the
program.
There is room for customization, so that if there are conditions or agreements
that you want to add to what I have offered, you may bring those ideas forward
for us to consider together.
2. Goal
Questions that elicit the participants coaching goal(s) include:
What do you want to accomplish through this coaching relationship?
What will be different when youve reached this goal?
How can we measure our progress?
At the end of our coaching work, what change do you want to have made?

www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
39
How can we state your objective so it depends only on what you do and not on the
choices or actions of others?
Now take that and state it in one short sentence: what do you want to
accomplish? (Tony Stoltzfus,2008)
How do you see your personal goals and your goals for your initiative
intertwining in our process?
3. Getting to Results
Sample questions:
How will we know that things are moving forward as you hoped?
When we check in at the beginning of each call, what do you think I could ask
you to learn about results?
When we end each call, how would you like to set goals for tracking during the
time between calls?
4. Feedback
Sample descriptions about feedback:
As a coach, I need your input to let me know what I am doing right and where I
can be more effective.
As a program, we also need your feedback on what is and what would be helpful
to people following the LAMM residential program.
I will personally ask you for feedback at the end of each session. You may also be
asked to talk with someone from LAMM about what works and what suggestions
you would have to make our coaching program stronger.
I want you to feel free to give me feedback on what works for you and what I
could do differently, so that I can be more helpful.

www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
40
E. Coaching Working Agreement

Coach:
Participant:
Change Initiative Summary:
Coaching Parameters and Agreement: (Note any specific individualization and agreed upon
processes.)
Goal for the Coaching Process: Identify the participants goals.
Results: Identify desired results and measures related to coaching.
Feedback Process: Note any comments or ideas about the feedback process.

www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
41
F. Coaching Session Evaluation
The following evaluation model captures three important elements of good coaching:
Relationship, Process, and Results. This template is based on work found in Coaching
People: Expert Solutions to Everyday Challenges (Mcmanus, P, 2006) and adapted to fit
the LAMM coaching program goals. The three elements include:
1. Relationship: The ability for coach and participant to build trust and have honest,
open, supportive dialogue.
2. Process: The specific structure of the coaching dialogue, including check in and
reflection, updates, discussion, action planning, and preparing for self-care and
return to the world of work.
3. Results: The perceived results of coaching, which could include new ideas and
approaches, new personal and professional goals, and/or accomplishments linked to
coaching.
It is important to note that, as a mutual process, coaching and the success of each session
rests on both coach and participant being present and working together. The rating and
discussion should include mutual reflection and feedback by both parties.
What Worked?
What Could be Improved?
Relationship:
Process:
Results:
Other Reflections:

www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
42
G. Coaching Self Evaluation Checklist: Coachs Personal Log
This log is adapted from the Coaching Self Evaluation tool in Coaching People: Expert
Solutions to Everyday Challenges (McManus, P 2006). The coach uses this tool to guide
self-reflection and set personal goals for development and focus in coaching practice. Not all
the skills and competencies listed will come into play in each session, but using the full
menu helps the coach track progress on her/his work.
In this coaching session, how did I
1. create possibility by combining goal attainment, value
achievement, and sustainability with new possibilities?
2. provide both support and autonomy?
3. work with the participant to set high yet attainable goals?
4. use transparency to build a trusting relationship?
5. link the participant to the larger network of LAMM and
other middle managers in the LAMM network?
6. respond to and adjust based on participant input about
what would be useful in the coaching relationship?
7. truly allow the coaching process to be self-directed?
8. use strategic questions to help the participant link vision,
intention, actions, and learning for desired results?
9. follow up on previously set action plans?
10. ask powerful questions to build reflection and selfawareness?
11. seek clarity by checking assumptions and using activelistening techniques?
12. promote self-efficacy through identification of strengths
and solutions depicted during this coaching session?
13. help the participant generate, ask, and sometimes answer
questions to advance thinking and progress?
14. give specific feedback linked to process and outcomes?
15. use my coaching role to support and deepen cultural
awareness and humility?
16. listen fully, putting all my attention on the participant?
17. model flexibility and openness in my coaching approach
and style?
18. .prepare for coaching in advance?
19. .support self-care and regenerative activities to help the
participant stay alive in the work?
20. end the session with reflection and creation of an action
plan?
Rating and
Comments
We hope that coaches find these tools and the following case study examples valuable for
developing and deepening their coaching skills.
LAMM alumni who seek coaching are leaders in different types of child welfare systems,
each with unique challenges for middle managers. We selected several case studies in order
to illustrate the coaching process:

www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
43
H. Coaching Case Study 1: Leading Change through Leading for Results

Julie is the Manager of Child Protective Services for a county office which includes a city
with a liberal reputation for its diversity, education, and a respect for the health of the
environment. Julie attended LAMM a year ago, and her change initiative focused on
implementing Permanency Roundtables. An original pilot site, Julies office, under her
leadership, was instrumental not only in testing the model, but also in spreading its
practice statewide. Julie came to LAMM thinking about how to jumpstart her offices focus
on family engagement and improving outcomes for children and families. Relatively new in
her leadership role, Julie was also eager for her own professional development, particularly
in supervising former peers, with whom she had competed for her position. Julie was eager
to learn effective leadership approaches for changing her agencys practices and not just to
gain compliance with a process.
Framing the Coaching Work Together
Julies stated challenge was her sense that she had not yet fully owned her role. While she
felt confident in executing tasks, Julie was less confident in her ability to deal with the
more subtle and complex challenges of leading the office in implementation of new
practices. This required that she hold the supervisory staff accountable for the
implementation outcome and move them into a unified management team. The way in
which Julie wanted to grow and develop her leadership voice and her team centered
primarily on culture change and effective and timely practice.
The coachs role was to help Julie push herself to try strategies that would be challenging,
such as having candid and crucial conversations with agency leaders who had authority
over her, with peers from other departments, and most centrally with supervisors on her
own leadership team who were the link to practice. Julie wanted to use coaching to give
herself assignments and to hold herself accountable to follow through on tasks and
approaches that she found intimidating.
The permanency roundtable initiative was a good opening for work with Julie on leading
change. Other supportive resources included the presence of a top school of social work, as
well as a community of progressive views, and a culture that supports human services. Her
agency is clear that they are engaged in social work practice, and hold a culture that values
this identity. The staff and the community are consistently responsive and view
engagement as central to the work of child welfare. They are committed to safety, as well as
preserving and building lifelong connections, family identity, and engaging the community.
Julie embraces this approach and identity as well.
Julie was an avid learner during LAMM and continued this approach in coaching. She
absorbed information with interest, particularly related to the importance and use of
assessing all of the drivers for performance and change. She particularly wanted to find a
way to align the agencys data systems and management team strengths as assets in
leading for results. One of the most striking aspects of the coaching work that Julie did was
challenging herself to lead in a more forthright manner and challenging herself and her
management team to realign the system and changing themselves to be increasingly more
effective at leading for results.
www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
44
This view of change leadership was new for Julie:

The biggest take-away from LAMM for me was the appreciation of the complexity of
change and implementation. Although I had worked in my county for decades, I never had a
clue that implementation of a practice innovation was so complex: I used to think, Weve
been given a directive, so we will make it happen. When it doesnt happen, the blame
begins: Central Office didnt roll this out right; its not a good idea, etc. But now I break it
down into all of the components of the change and implementation and recognize all of the
adaptive elements that need continuous attention and ongoing adjustment to maintain the
forward momentum.
In addition to her change initiative and the larger issue of performance based on results,
Julie was dealing with changes in her leadership role. Specifically, Julie wanted to develop
confidence and the necessary skills to provide leadership in the office, agency, and
community. Between her awareness of her personal goals and her goal that the agency
more fully embrace achieving timely permanency, Julie was anxious to get started and
make a difference.
Learning about leadership and management at LAMM was a real turning point for me. I
left the training feeling like a leader and ready to own my position as CPS Manager.
During LAMM and afterwards when Julie returned home, she realized that she was not
using data in her work with her staff and that, in fact, the state and the county struggled to
use data at all. She wondered if she was looking at the right data and reports and whether
she could distill meaningful information from those reports in an organization where it was
the culture to dismiss the use of data and numbers as antithetical to real social work.
For example, Julie and her team looked at data regarding timely initial assessments. Julie
asked the Data Analyst to generate reports that gave her the information she needed to
manage performance for the office. Her own review of the data led to the discovery that the
delay and backlog of initial assessments was significant. This played out in a few ways.
A Leadership Strategy
Julie wanted to accomplish two things in her work with her supervisory staff:
create a sense of teamwork and collaboration
help her supervisory staff insist on accountability from their workers
While Julie wanted to use the data about initial assessments in her management meeting,
she did not want to create resentment. The conversation she had to have was tough,
because the office culture was, at the time, very cynical about the use of data and numbers.
Julies use of the implementation drivers and the Adaptive Leadership approach served her
well. Julie was able to use and model many of the behaviors that would lead to effective
change, such as taking time to diagnose both the system and herself. She started to notice
not just that there were barriers to improving on performance and getting closure
www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
45
(timeframes, permanency) but that some of the underlying issues and root causes were
really more about the staff (including herself) than they were about the families or context
of the work.
When we discuss social issues as a leadership team, my Supervisors and I are all on the
same page and have lively discussions about the root causes of problems facing the families
in our county. When the conversation changes to issues around compliance with
performance standards, its almost like an invisible wall goes up and the conversation is
more strained.
A review of the numbers presented another challenge. Julie saw that a longtime peer of
hers- who had once supervised her, had the greatest number of backlogged cases. Julie was
concerned that she did not have enough credibility or legitimacy in her role to hold her
longtime peer accountable. Julie realized that she needed to step up and be clear and
compelling as a leader and that she would never change if her lack of confidence allowed
her to fall back on old patterns
Julie tapped into several of the tenets of Adaptive Leadership related to her use of data
with the leaders. She was able both to orchestrate conflict and regulate distress in leading
the focus on data and using pre-work and her relationships to help the team grapple with
the task at hand. Julie also used the tactic of Giving the work back to the People by having
the group struggle with how to be timely with assessments. As a result of Julies approach,
which was to name the difficult challenges, the management meeting went well.
As a result of those meetings and other interventions that Julie led at the organizational
and administrative levels, the office achieved a 75% reduction in backlog assessments
within nine months!
That initial success continues to inform the way that the management team functions and
drives performance beyond timeliness, as Julie and her team continue to strive to
understand how to use required data to address the adaptive challenges intrinsic in child
welfare work. Julies approach which exemplified both, distributive leadership by sharing
the responsibility for solutions, and her own personal leadership power through her own
advocacy role to move administrative drivers, winds up a great model for what she would
like to see for families.
A Coaching Strategy
Coaching was an important part of self and organizational development. As a coach, my
role was to witness and probe for further diagnosis of the system and of Julies strategy.
The primary coaching opportunity was to help Julie with her own action planning around
the delicate balance of asserting her authority and her right to the role of manager, while
also helping her build on her tremendous strength for empathy and teambuilding without
getting stuck in either inaction or replicating ineffective patterns.
Julie set difficult tasks for herself, such as asking her boss for permission and support in
working differently with I.T. or having a tough conversation with a supervisor who was not
www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
46
fully on board with Julies leadership role. Resisting the urge to maintain predictable and
comfortable behavior is extremely hardand sometimes painfulwork. Coaching provided
a structured and trusting environment for Julie to be vulnerable and strategize new
behavior. The fact that Julie brought a focused and clear set of goals to each coaching
session supported her clarity, commitment and accountability
There are still aspects of the new practices that Julie hopes to improve. She continues to
focus on results and build a work culture of high performance and successful outcomes for
children and families. She added the Data Analyst to the advisory group for Permanency
Roundtables and is working with that team to identify some key outcomes of permanency.
Julie has been able to use data to bring clarity to her work with the management team and
with the staff. Her next goal is to develop a team equipped to use data to influence
stakeholders, including the court system and the county.
Last month, the Initial Assessment unit reached their critical goal with significant
permanency improvements. Julie and the supervisors surprised them with a
congratulations party, complete with flowers to signify the coming of spring and the new
and fresh work they were doing. She was not sure how this appreciation went over until
staff in the various units told her that the initial assessment staff were abuzz with pleasure
at being recognized. Julie has continued to plant seeds and is starting to see her office and
team flourish as they grow in their ability to work for effective processes that bring great
results for children and families.

www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
47
Coaching Case Study II: The Adaptive Challenge

From the start, Angela was on a mission. She came to LAMM attentive and focused. Her
conversations centered on the work she was doing to move her state towards improved
trauma-related services and outcomes for children. The initial focus of her change initiative
was working with resource family development and training. As the lead for the project,
Angela struggled to feel effective and valued by her leadership team. During LAMM Angela
worked on how to present her informed views in a way they would be heard and her ideas
implemented. Since LAMM focused on the leaders role in implementation and the
importance of aligning identified drivers, Angela began to develop new ideas about the
ways that understanding trauma could and should transform the system.
Shortly after returning to work from LAMM, Angela learned that the work she was doing
was going to be outsourced to a private agency and would furthermore be piloted on the
opposite side of the state. She was told she would continue in her lead role; however the
logistics of leading from across the state compromised her opportunity to fully participate.
During the initial phase of the change initiative implementation, it concerned me that the
agency could not commit to fully adopting my plan to train staff and resource parents on the
impact of trauma that influenced the outcomes for children in foster care and their parents. I
was happy to learn that the western half of our state would receive the much needed
information, but I was disheartened by what felt like a disconnect between my energy to
create the change and the limited focus I could devote to the project, since I obviously
couldnt lead it from a distance. I was very concerned that the project would flounder, or
result in a very small impact on only a few foster parents, leaving out our staff and relative
care providers. I had to work hard to stay involved and active as the project seemed to move
away from me. I used coaching to think about leading in a different way.
Angela had to regroup, but remained strong in her mission. She continued to follow the
progress of the initiative related to training and supporting resource families. Meanwhile,
some of the coaching Angela utilized concerned her goal to establish her value to the agency
during reorganization. She gained increased independence and worked on new programs.
Really, the hardest part of the reorganization was the long wait, seven months, to figure out
where I would eventually land then capturing my footing as I learned new programs and
built a new team.
Months after attending LAMM, Angela and her fellow LAMM attendees were invited to do
a presentation to the state leadership about their LAMM experiences and change initiative.
There was renewed interest in the initiative, as the Department of Mental Health was
encouraging Child and Family Services to become trauma informed, along with a similar
emphasis by the ACF. It was a great opportunity but meant that Angela had to face her
worst nightmare: public speaking to the agencys executive team.
Angela used coaching to prepare for the presentation. Angelas primary goal was to convey
the urgency and importance of addressing trauma and finding resources and kin families
who could help children heal while in foster care. Angelas secondary goal was to promote
www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
48
the ideas and values she learned at LAMM regarding the importance of Leading for
Results. She used data and logic models to link the drivers and interventions taking place
between the first step (conveying the importance and value of trauma informed practice)
and the final goal (serving children who have experienced trauma in a way that provides
stability and promotes healing). Just prior to the speaking event, Angela practiced her
presentation with her coach.
The presentation was very well received by leadership. Angela garnered validation and
kudos from the executive team and a university partner who offered to assist with the data
collection following training.
Internal resources were still scarce, but Angela arranged community support for free trainthe-trainer for staff, resource development staff and fellow training resource parents.
Angela used coaching to identify free technical assistance from the National Child
Traumatic Stress, and she focused on developing capacity in court, case management and
internal stakeholders, as well as the foster parents and kin providers. Eventually the
agency subcontracted with the Childrens Advocacy Center to provide training consultation
for the workgroup.
One of the topics discussed most often in coaching was Angelas challenge to increase
awareness of trauma among staff, foster caregivers, parents and relatives at the same time
there were few resources to provide trauma-healing treatment among parents and children.
Angela was able to include providers and the School(s) of Social Work on the advisory and
participatory boards so that the community could develop a response in addition to the
work being done in the agency and in the caregiver community.
Angela became a very public speaker about trauma and its impact on children, youth and
families, a demand that continued to cause her stress. Her coaching focused on how to use
her strengths to help her work through the rough parts and to use strategies she learned in
LAMM to demonstrate her leadership.
I pushed myself to do more up front advocacy during the process of the project development,
and I used coaching to prepare myself and to prepare materials that would support me in a
more public role than I would usually choose. At the same time I used coaching to identify
ways that I could comfortably and effectively delegate training and other speaking roles to
others in the advisory group.
Angelas demonstrated ability to lead with strong commitment to the mission of the work is
a model for those directly involved in the initiative and for the agency. Her public advocacy
and voice have become stronger and more polished as she has been able to use her
commitment to overcome her natural discomfort with public speaking.
Its frustrating to have experienced two downsizings, two reorganizations, change of
leadership/supervision, office locations, staff, programs, etc. in a matter of two years. Staffs
morale and focus have been divided between managing their work and struggling to
determine if they even have employment, and if so, what it will look like in the future. These
circumstances have made it especially hard to ask them to commit and focus on my change
www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
49
initiative when they are preoccupied with their personal welfare. At the same time, having a
trauma-informed and responsive system assists staff and the agency with achieving several
of our PIP goals/outcomes. The support of my community partners, my coach and the
commitment of the contracted partnerships have kept the work moving forward. Over time I
have gathered the tools and developed partnerships needed to convince administration and
staff that we need the information to improve our work with children, families and resource
providers.
The following table summarizes the diagnoses of self and the agency and the actions that
resulted through coaching.
Self
Agency
Diagnosis:
Totally committed to what children need: will do
what it takes to remain active on this initiative,
because she believes it is information that has to
inform the way the system and foster, kin, and
parents work to heal children
Wants to become more respected and effective
as a leader
Hates public speaking and presenting which are
required for the leadership role
Diagnosis:
Did not have the manpower to devote to this
endeavor while focused on meeting CFSR
requirements
Working to upgrade Resource Parents training,
but nothing in the works for all staff
Constant change due to budget, re-organization,
and resource shortages means its hard to stick
with any initiative
Leadership changes to grant: 1) outsourcing the
project to a private agency, and 2) piloting in a
location several hours from Angelas home base,
both of which changed her ability to directly lead
the initiative

www.ncwwi.org
Action:
Stay involved, even if the
project is not a state
priority
Push to pilot even if
initiative is delayed
Balance commitment
within the constraints of
newly assigned programs
and work
Push self to present
Take risks in public
speaking and advocacy
Action:
Advocate and ensure
that child welfare staffs
the service array and
caregivers understand
and act in ways that are
trauma informed
Find and use free
resources
Build community
supports for the work

September 2013
50
Coaching Case Study III

A.
State Administered, State Run System: Olivia
In state administered systems, middle managers are often the top tier of administration
where they work directly for appointed executives. These middle managers are often under
pressure to carry out the administrations plans quickly and achieve fast results and change
to support the authority and credibility of state leadership.
Olivia attended LAMM while serving in a specialist position and returned to work following
LAMM, newly promoted to deputy director. Olivia had strong analytic and advocacy skills,
as well as energy and commitment to work hard in order to get things done. Olivia is also
reflective and used LAMMs journaling process as an ongoing practice in her life. Olivia
requested ongoing coaching before LAMM ended, and her goal was to be an effective
advocate and leader, while staying true to her own convictions about the needs of children
and youth in the system.
Olivia brought much strength to her new role as a deputy to a new director. The director
came to the agency from another state, while Olivias extensive knowledge about the states
system and contacts came from her long professional career in the state. Her background
complimented the new directors demonstrated success, leading the child welfare system in
a different state. Olivia was able to help the new director establish credibility and garner
support for tasks that were central to the Governors plans and were also challenging to
implement from a political and practical standpoint. Olivia quickly became a confidante
and go to person for the director.
Early coaching focused on helping Olivia move into a political role which involved
facilitating several collaborative stakeholder workgroups to tackle complex policy and
contracting issues. She won support of judges, providers, and internal staff for her ability to
bring people together without compromising the needs of the agency and the interests of
children. Olivias personal goal was to bring all voices forward, even when she represented
some non-negotiable positions of the administration.
During this time, coaching focused on two goals:
To create a holding environment where Olivia could express her thoughts and
emotional reactions to the internal teamwork in the agency and recognize her
contribution to the situation.
To strategize and plan for ways to effectively hold true to and advance her
personal commitment to children in the system.
With coaching, Olivia was able to stand on the balcony, seeing things from a wide
perspective which allowed her to assess and strategize her adjustment into a new role. She
also practiced ways to advocate for changes that would help the children in the states care.
Coaching was especially useful in providing a safe environment in which to process the
dynamics regarding my promotion to a position in which I became the supervisor of those
who had most recently managed me (Olivia, 2013).
www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
51
When the legislature was in session, Olivia used her coaching time to develop ways to move
forward politically. Coaching helped Olivia to determine when she should keep advocating
and pushing for actions with her own leadership. At other times, she used coaching to
consider how to infuse legislation, policy or communications with language and principles
that reflected agency goals while maintaining her commitment to meaningful outcomes.
By the end of coaching, two questions would be important: 1) How do the actions you are
considering right now impact your long term effectiveness in this work and effort, and 2)
How are you taking care of yourself?
Newly promoted managers tend to work extra hours and sacrifice self-care in order to prove
their value and competence while they are learning a new set of tasks, roles, and
responsibilities. Olivia used coaching to develop and monitor plans for self-care and
balance. The coach pointed out times when Olivia was overstretching, particularly in areas
where she could delegate to preserve her own calm and centered approach to the work.
During this time, coaching provided an environment to discuss politically charged issues,
while balancing that with the needs of children and families across the state. Coaching also
allowed me to discuss why achievement is so important on a personal level, and this enabled
me to balance my passion for the work with my life outside of work (Olivia, 2013).
As the legislative session continued, the level of over performance that Olivia
demonstrated early on became the norm for her leader and her team. Her gift at working to
support and expand the influence of the director evolved into a complex predicament of
political tension. Stakeholders increasingly approached and confided in Olivia rather than
the director, creating a level of competition with the director, who began to make
demeaning demands or disparaging remarks to Olivia in front of other internal and
external team members. Coaching interactions provided a safe place to discuss these
delicate issues that are hard to manage in the political realm. Olivia also used coaching to
balance herself in a holding environment, safe from the political arena.
B.
State Supported, County Administered System: Darleen
While federal funding for child welfare services runs through the State, county run systems
administer the funds and have some latitude through local leadership, giving the manager
the opportunity to impact the service delivery system. Directors are hired and subject to
oversight by a local board of commissioners who are publicly elected and held accountable
by voters as well as administrative and funding regulations. Child welfare managers in
most small counties work directly for the director and often have a stable workforce due to
the limited number of available professional jobs.
Darleen was sent to LAMM by an administration eager for her to enhance her role as a
trainer and leader on the states Differential Response Leadership Council. After 25 years
in the field, Darleen was still excited about what she could learn personally and contribute
to the field of child welfare. Darleen was also active with the Statewide Implementation
www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
52
Team which was developing practice profiles and redefining the workforce hiring and
development program.
Coaching began with the adaptive challenges underpinning Darleens change initiative,
Differential Response. Darleen was responsible for implementing the new practice with her
unit and also assisting her peers in implementation and decision-making among programs.
Darleen and her fellow managers were adjusting to a new leader in the office, as well as
trying to understand and implement the significant practice changes represented by
Differential Response. Initially, the new director was interested in Darleens experiences
during LAMM training, but there were emerging tensions and stress in the relationship
between the new leader and the management team.
I valued and looked forward to my coaching sessions. Coaching was a place where I could
think through what I wanted to propose and where I could identify the ways that what I was
asking might seem threatening to a leadership team where trust was a challenge (Darleen,
2013).
Darleen worked to build leadership in line staff and supervisors, by sharing tasks and work
that fit with the strengths of individuals on the team. She focused on building champions
for the work.
Implementation of a change initiative is generally a mix of technical and adaptive
challenges. Using compliance to achieve technical change includes focusing on whether
people are doing what they have been asked to do and doing it well enough to get results.
The more complex adaptive level of change requires an organizational culture shift, so that
this new behavior becomes the way we do things. Focus is then on values intrinsic to this
shift.
Darleen understood that she needed different levels of support and ownership from
different stakeholder groups in her agency. She considered the needs and interests of her
peers, which centered primarily on personnel issues including hiring. She used existing
initiatives and the current hiring process to help her peers think through leadership and
practice strategies that would advance the goal of hiring and developing a competent
workforce. Darleen was also able to guide her agency supervisors and field staff to think
through new approaches with families, balancing engagement and accountability.
Darleen used LAMM coaching to strategize at multiple levels: moving between working the
change in practice and working the change in organizational culture, understanding that
both adaptive and technical challenges have to be met to achieve sustainable change.
I spent many hours devoted to evaluation and getting on the balcony. My coach re-affirmed
that I was making the best decisions for myself, for my agency, and for the families we serve
(Darleen, 2013).
Following a year of controversy and coaching, the leadership changed. The new director has
been committed to and supportive of the work on which Darleen has been focused. With the
www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
53
directors support, the management team was able to step back, do some healing together
and re-commit to a collaborative process that would rebuild trust.
Coaching provided Darleen the opportunity to reflect on practice and use the holding
environment of coaching to explore perceptions of her style and effectiveness. Darleen
began to work with other teams to promote some team reflection and group consultation.
The trust level in the office improved and the managers have formed a team that is willing
to take risks together. Darleens tenure, expertise and credibility have allowed her to
successfully build a supportive learning environment.
Summary
In each of these case studies, the challenges faced by middle managers in implementing
change required that they apply and integrate the LAMM training to help with leadership
challenges in all four of the Leadership Model quadrants: Leading Change, Leading in
Context, Leading People and Leading for Results, as well as the inner circle of selfmanagement and regeneration.
Middle managers often move into their positions with limited awareness of the political
environment of their work. The ability to operate politically shifts into an important new
level of skill for middle managers. The coaching approach promoted self-exploration and
conversations about how to advocate effectively for changes. These middle managers often
used coaching as a safe place to make ethical decisions about how to carry out their role to
serve children most effectively. Coaching also helped to create awareness of the importance
of readiness for change and the ability to keep goals on the table, ready for the opportunity
to expand collaborative thinking and planning with leadership teams. Other middle
managers learned ways to balance engagement and accountability on both personal and
systemic levels.
Middle managers also worked on self-management. Since many managers work on multiple
projects and are often over-extended, coaching provides the chance to step back and assess
commitments and performance and link to personal and professional goals and actions. As
one LAMM graduate said:
Coaching helped me stay focused on what was important to me in terms of helping children,
families and staff. In order to drive practice I had to dance on the floor and step away by
looking from the balcony long enough to remember that I need to build connections within
leadership and advocate for collaboration, time and support within my own leadership
team (Anonymous).
While each of these case studies is unique, they also represent typical and shared
challenges faced by middle managers every day. One hour of coaching per month afforded
these and other leaders a place to reflect rather than simply to react. Coaching provided a
safe environment for self- and systemic- exploration.

www.ncwwi.org

September 2013
54

LAMM Coaching Manual

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

LAMM Coaching Manual

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

LAMM Coaching Manual

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Leadership Academy for Middle

National Child Welfare Workforce Institute

Patricia Mosher, Leadership Academy for Middle Managers, Consultant/Trainer/Coach

For more information

Please visit the NCWWI website at www.ncwwi.org

A Service of the Children's Bureau, a member of the T/TA Network

Introduction to the LAMM Coaching Manual ......................................................... 4

Background and Purpose ............................................................................. 4

Principles and Assumptions of Effective LAMM Coaching .................................... 8

Attributes and Skills of an Effective LAMM Coach ..... ..10

The LAMM Coaching Framework ..... .13

Coaching Evaluation Plan ..... ..23

Coaching Toolkit ..... 26

National Child Welfare Workforce Institute

A Service of the Children's Bureau, a member of the T/TA Network

Introduction to the LAMM Coaching Manual

A. Background and Purpose

National Child Welfare Workforce Institute

A Service of the Children's Bureau, a member of the T/TA Network

B. Coaching Literature Review

Successful implementation of effective child welfare interventions requires behavior change

Moving from new learner to master practitioner. The LAMM introduces

A Service of the Children's Bureau, a member of the T/TA Network

In particular, LAMM coaching is a structured process in which a coach uses specific

National Child Welfare Workforce Institute

A Service of the Children's Bureau, a member of the T/TA Network

National Child Welfare Workforce Institute

A Service of the Children's Bureau, a member of the T/TA Network

II. Principles & Assumptions of Effective LAMM

Effective coaching is driven by the person being coached: self-directed

Effective coaching facilitates the growth and leadership development of

Creates a partnership for learning and change.

Effective LAMM coaching supports the development, implementation, and

Focuses on proven implementation principles and strategies that promote

National Child Welfare Workforce Institute

A Service of the Children's Bureau, a member of the T/TA Network

Promotes consideration and inclusion of diverse perspectives, ideas, and people

Effective LAMM coaching facilitates participants application of leadership

Helps participants apply the NCWWI Leadership Model to leadership

National Child Welfare Workforce Institute

A Service of the Children's Bureau, a member of the T/TA Network

III. Attributes and Skills of an Effective LAMM Coach

Current knowledge of the child welfare policy and program context

Meet ethical standards of coaching

Offer content and context knowledge

Provide professional development support

National Child Welfare Workforce Institute

A Service of the Children's Bureau, a member of the T/TA Network

Supports self-reflection and cultural-humility.

Manage progress and share accountability

Attributes & Skills

Coaching Intervention Skills

Ask powerful questions

Give advice when requested

Use reflective practice

National Child Welfare Workforce Institute

A Service of the Children's Bureau, a member of the T/TA Network

Use empathy and rapport to develop effective coaching relationships

Display different levels of listening

Maintain professional demeanor