Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Exercise No. 2
Exercise No. 2
BSEd 3 (BioSci)
June 6, 2014
Objectives:
After discussing about Product-Oriented Performance-Based Assessment, I will be
able to identify learning competencies from the tasks based on my major field of
specialization.
Using the concept of Product-Oriented Performance-Based Assessment, I will be
able to construct my own Analytic and Holistic Rubrics with at least 90% accuracy.
II. Data:
Topic: Matter
Task 1: Create a model of matter molecules.
Objective: To construct a concrete example of matter molecules.
Learning Competencies:
o Sketches a model of an atom with quality.
o Labels the parts/composition of an atom.
o Applies colors neatly on it for specification.
o Shows creativity in your work.
o Submits the output on time.
Scoring Rubrics:
Analytic Rubric
Criteria
Sketched
model with
quality
Weight
1 Poor
2 Fair
3 Good
4 Excellent
x1
Needs
improvement
Acceptable
quality
Good quality
Excellent
Labeled parts
x2
Only 1
labeled part
2 labeled
parts
All parts
labeled
Neatness of
colors applied
x3
Not labeled at
all
Neatness of
colors were
poorly
applied
Vaguely
applied
Neatly
applied with
few errors
Well applied
without errors
Creativity
x3
Creativity is
not shown
Fair/less
shown
Good
Exemplary
x2
Submitted
2-more days
after deadline
Submitted
a day after
the deadline
Submitted on
the deadline
Submitted
before
deadline
Submission
Holistic Rubric
4 Excellent
Excellent
All parts were labeled
Well applied without errors
Exemplary
Submitted before deadline
3 Good
Good quality
2 labeled parts
Neatly applied with few errors
Good
Submitted on the deadline
2 Fair
Acceptable quality
Only 1 labeled part
Vaguely applied
Fair/less shown
Submitted a day after the deadline
1 Poor
Needs improvement
Not labeled at all
Neatness of colors were poorly applied
Creativity is not shown
Submitted 2-more days after deadline
Task 2: Find the physical properties of solid and liquid through conducting an experiment and
obtain accurate results.
Objective: To perform an experiment with confidence and obtain proficient results.
Learning Competencies:
o Selects at least 5 solid samples and 5 liquid samples.
o Describes each appearance, included its properties (color, shape and texture).
o Explains the differences of two samples.
o Answers 1-7 questions.
o Submits the laboratory report on time.
Scoring Rubrics:
Analytic Rubric
Criteria
Weight
Selected
sample
Description of
each
appearance
Explanation of
differences
Answered
question
Submission
x1
X3
1 Poor
1 selected
sample of
solid and 1
liquid
2 Fair
1-2 selected
sample of
solid and 1
liquid
3 Good
3-4 selected
sample in
solid same as
liquid
No
appearance
is described
Color and
shape were
described in
both
Merely
explained
without
connection to
theories
Clearly
explained
with
connection of
theory
X2
Not explained
at all
X1
Only 2 out of
7 were
answered
1-3 questions
were
answered
1-6 questions
were
answered
X1
Submitted a
day after the
deadline
Submitted on
the deadline
4 Excellent
5 or more of
both selected
sample
All properties
and
appearance
were
described
All properties
and
appearance
were
described
and explained
well
All questions
were
exemplary
answered
Submitted
before
deadline
Holistic Rubric
4 Excellent
5 or more of both selected sample
All properties and appearance were described
All properties and appearance were described and explained well
All questions were exemplary answered
Submitted before deadline
3 Good
3-4 selected sample in solid same as liquid
Color and shape were described in both
Clearly explained with connection of theory
1-6 questions were answered
Submitted on the deadline
2 Fair
1-2 selected sample of solid and 1 liquid
Only the color is described in both solid and liquid
1 Poor
Task 3: Conduct a written examination about properties of matter and obtain accurate results.
Objective: To infer concepts about the properties of matter.
Learning Competencies:
o Explains the different concepts in not less than 4 sentences.
o Constructs complete sentences in terms listed (gravity, weight and density).
o Summarizes the concepts about the properties of matter with maximum of 6
sentences but not less than 4 sentences.
o Clarifies your answer with theories.
o Write your answer legibly on the provided sheets.
Scoring Rubrics:
Analytic Rubric
Criteria
Explained
concepts
Constructed
terms into
complete
thought
Summary of
concepts
Weight
1 Poor
2 Fair
x1
Concepts
were poorly
explained
Concepts
were slightly
explained
with 2
sentences
each
x2
No terms
were
constructed
at all
Summarized
with less
than 4
sentences
Summarized
in 4
sentences
but doesnt
have
x3
3 Good
Concepts
were
satisfactory
explained
with 3
sentences
each
Terms weight
and density
were
constructed
in complete
sentences
Summarized
in 5
sentences
with clear
content
4 Excellent
Concepts were
excellently
explained, 4-5
sentences
Clarified
answers with
theories
x2
Not clarified/
Not relevant
Legibility
x2
Not legibly
written
important
contents
Merely
clarified at
most 65%
clarification
Slightly
legible/
readable
66-80%
clarification
with some
theories
81-100%
clarification with
theories
Legibly good
Legibly
written/excellent
Holistic Rubric
4 Excellent
Concepts were excellently explained, 4-5 sentences
All terms were constructed well in a complete sentences
Summarized excellently with complete important contents
81-100% clarification with theories
Legibly written/excellent
3 Good
Concepts were satisfactory explained with 3 sentences each
Terms weight and density were constructed in complete sentences
Summarized in 5 sentences with clear content
66-80% clarification with some theories
Legibly good
2 Fair
Concepts were slightly explained with 2 sentences each
Only the term gravity is constructed in a sentence
Summarized in 4 sentences but doesnt have important contents
Merely clarified at most 65% clarification
Slightly legible/readable
1 Poor
Concepts were poorly explained
No terms were constructed at all
Summarized with less than 4 sentences
Not clarified/Not relevant
Not legibly written
Scoring Rubrics:
Analytic Rubric
Criteria
Weight
1 Poor
10%
selected
concepts/
content
2 Fair
Selected
concepts/
contents
x1
Supplied
examples
x2
No examples
at all
Only 1 example
on each sub-topic
2 examples
on each
x3
1-2 slide
transitions
were applied
1-4 slide
transitions were
applied
1-5 slide
transitions
were applied
x3
No
animation
applied
1-2 animations
applied
1-4 slide
animations
applied
Poor quality
Quality is
satisfactory
shown
Good quality
shown
Slide
transitions
applied
Slide
animations
applied
Shown
quality of the
output
x2
11-50% selected
concepts/content
s
3 Good
51-80%
selected
concepts/
contents
Holistic Rubric
4 Excellent
81-100% selected concepts /contents
3 or more examples on each sub-topic
3 or more slide transitions were applied
5 or more animations applied
4 Excellent
81-100%
selected
concepts
/contents
3 or more
examples on
each subtopic
3 or more
slide
transitions
were applied
5 or more
animations
applied
Quality
exceeds
expectation
3 Good
2 Fair
1 Poor
Scoring Rubrics:
Analytic Rubric
Criteria
Weight
1 Poor
2 Fair
3 Good
Videos made
x1
Only 1 video
was made
2 videos were
made
3 videos were
made
Designed
x2
Poorly
designed with
poor quality
Satisfactory
designed with
less quality
With good
design and
good quality
videos with
4 Excellent
4 or more
videos were
made
Quality of
design
exceeds
quality
expectation
Explanations
Duration
Originality
x3
No provided
explanation
Few
explanations
were
provided but
doesnt have
scientific
bases
Explanations
were
provided with
some
scientific
bases
x3
1-2 minutes
time duration
applied
3-4 minutes
time duration
applied
5 minutes
time duration
applied
x2
No originality
shown
50-79%
originality
shown
80-90%
originality
shown
Holistic Rubric
4 Excellent
4 or more videos were made
Quality of design exceeds expectation
Exemplarily provided with explanations with relevant
scientific bases
Required time limit is applied and followed well for each
video
91-100% originality shown
3 Good
3 videos were made
With good design and good quality
Explanations were provided with some scientific bases
5 minutes time duration applied
80-90% originality shown
2 Fair
2 videos were made
Satisfactory designed with less quality
Few explanations were provided but dont have scientific
bases
3-4 minutes time duration applied
Exemplarily
provided with
explanations
with relevant
scientific
bases
Required time
limit is
applied and
followed well
for each
video
91-100%
originality
shown
1 Poor
III. Reflection:
This exercise on Product-Oriented Performance-Based Assessment was about making
different tasks with corresponding competencies and from it, scoring rubrics can be made and
constructed just like in the process-oriented performance-based assessment. In this exercise, it
gives different strategy to design a task and to make the rubrics be effective one and only
covers the product-oriented performance of students output in certain activity theyve done. It
also needs much specification of the learning competencies and see to it that the learning
competencies are measurable. Doing this activity is very time-consuming and need to be
planned properly to come up with successful results and I found this activity quite easy than the
process-oriented performance which for me is confusing. However, I was able to make it and I
was glad that I was able to obtain my objectives on this activity.