Rape requires forcing another person into non-consensual sexual intercourse or penetration. The document examines a case where a man held a woman at knifepoint, attempted to penetrate her vagina with his penis twice but was only partially successful due to her movement. The court ruled this was consummated rape, not frustrated rape, as any penetration, no matter how slight, is sufficient for rape. The key facts are that rape does not require full penetration and this case demonstrated sufficient penetration for rape rather than an attempted rape.
Rape requires forcing another person into non-consensual sexual intercourse or penetration. The document examines a case where a man held a woman at knifepoint, attempted to penetrate her vagina with his penis twice but was only partially successful due to her movement. The court ruled this was consummated rape, not frustrated rape, as any penetration, no matter how slight, is sufficient for rape. The key facts are that rape does not require full penetration and this case demonstrated sufficient penetration for rape rather than an attempted rape.
Rape requires forcing another person into non-consensual sexual intercourse or penetration. The document examines a case where a man held a woman at knifepoint, attempted to penetrate her vagina with his penis twice but was only partially successful due to her movement. The court ruled this was consummated rape, not frustrated rape, as any penetration, no matter how slight, is sufficient for rape. The key facts are that rape does not require full penetration and this case demonstrated sufficient penetration for rape rather than an attempted rape.
Rape requires forcing another person into non-consensual sexual intercourse or penetration. The document examines a case where a man held a woman at knifepoint, attempted to penetrate her vagina with his penis twice but was only partially successful due to her movement. The court ruled this was consummated rape, not frustrated rape, as any penetration, no matter how slight, is sufficient for rape. The key facts are that rape does not require full penetration and this case demonstrated sufficient penetration for rape rather than an attempted rape.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1
No, there is no frustrated rape.
Rape, as defined by the Oxford Dictionary, is the crime, typically committed
by a man, of forcing another person to have sexual intercourse with the offender against their will. In Merriam-Webster Dictionary, rape is an unlawful sexual activity and usually sexual intercourse carried out forcibly or under threat or injury against the will usually of a female or with a person who is beneath a certain age or incapable of valid consent. To answer the question whether or not frustrated rape exists, we cite the case of Christina S. Abayan in People vs Orita G.R. No. 88724 April 3, 1990. On March 20, 1983, Christina S. Abayan arrived at her boarding house after coming from a party. She saw Ceilito Orita, a frequent visitor of another boarder. Orita held Abayan and poked a balisong at her. While his arm wrapped around her neck and the other poking the balisong at Abayan, he then dragged her on the second floor of the boarding house and entered Abayans room upon Oritas command to find them a room. He ordered her to lie down on the floor and then mounted her. Orita made her hold his penis and insert it in her vagina. With the balisong still poked at her, she did as told but since she kept moving, only a portion of his penis entered her. He then laid down on his back and commanded her to mount him. Still only a small part of his penis was inserted into her vagina. When Oritas hands were flat on the floor, Abayan ran away naked. She ran from room to room until she jumped out the window and found help. Clearly, in the crime of rape, from the moment the offender has carnal knowledge of his victim he actually attains his purpose and, from that moment also all the essential elements of the offense have been accomplished. Nothing more is left to be done by the offender, because he has performed the last act necessary to produce the crime. Thus, the felony is consummated. We have set the uniform rule that for the consummation of rape, perfect penetration is not essential. Any penetration of the female organ by the male organ is sufficient. Entry of the labia or lips of the female organ, without rupture of the hymen or laceration of the vagina is sufficient to warrant conviction (People v Orita G.R. No. 88724 April 3, 1990). With the things mentioned above, the court ruled out Orita guilty of consummated rape and not just merely a frustrated rape. Rape is either attempted or consummated. There is no frustrated rape (People v. Aca-ac, G.R. No. 142500, 20 April 2001).