CFD Analysis & Experimental Investigation of NACA0018 Blade Profile For Darrieus Turbine
CFD Analysis & Experimental Investigation of NACA0018 Blade Profile For Darrieus Turbine
CFD Analysis & Experimental Investigation of NACA0018 Blade Profile For Darrieus Turbine
ABSTRACT
In present work an attempt is made to investigate the Lift and Drag forces for wind turbine blade at 4000 Reynolds number and
different chord length i.e.15cm & 25 cm. In this work NACA0018 airfoil profile is considered for analysis of wind turbine
blade. The Lift and Drag forces are calculated at different angle of attack varying from 0o to 80o by Computational Fluid
Dynamics (CFD) analysis. The values of CL and CD for this Reynolds number is much important in analysis of Darrieus and
horizontal axis type of wind turbine blade, still it these values are not available from the literature reviewed . From CFD
analysis it is concluded that as Reynolds number increase lift forces and drag forces decreases for particular chord length and
if chord length increases CL and CD increases. And Comparison has been done on NACA0018 for all two chord length and
from that we concluded that NACA0018 at 15cm provides maximum lift and drag.
Keywords: Lift coefficient, Drag coefficient, angel of attack, NACA Blade profile, Chord length.
1. INTRODUCTION
Due to day by day increase in populations in India and world there is need simple economical device which will
produce electricity very fast and at very low cost. This need of modern society will be fulfill by simple three blade wind
turbine which is called darreius turbine. Selection of aero foil shape of blade is the most critical part of a wind turbine
design as ultimately blade is responsible for conversion of kinetic energy into mechanical energy. Aerodynamics is a
science and study of physical laws of the behavior of objects in airflow and the forces that are produced by airflows.
Aerodynamic performance of wind turbine blades can be analyzed using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), which
is one of the branches of fluid mechanics. Aerodynamic studies are quite mature for flows with large Reynolds number.
However, there are not much analytical, numerical or experimental studies available for flows at very low Reynolds
numbers. In order to extract the maximum kinetic energy from wind, researchers put much effort on the design of
effective blade geometry. Consideration of 2D geometries, i.e., airfoils, for such studies seems to be a good starting
point to improve understanding of higher Reynolds number flows.In this regard, some experimental studies are
reported in Schmitz F. W., 1967, Sunada S. et al., 1997 [1], Sunada S. et al., 2002 [2], M.Nazmul 2015 [3]. The effects of
aerofoil profile modification on a vertical axis wind turbine performance are presented in by MdFarathIsmail,
Krishanavijayrahgavan 2015 [4]. The effect of Blockage-tolerant wind tunnel measurements for a NACA 0012 at high
angles attack is presented by J.M Rainbird , J .Peiro 2015 [5].N. Rostamzadeh et al.2012[6] has performed novel
variation on tubercles was employed to modify a NACA0021 airfoil for wind tunnel pressure measurement tests in the
transitional flow regime. K. E. Swalwell et al. 2001[7] has done investigation effect of turbulence intensity on stall of the
NACA0021 aerofoil increasing the turbulence intensity delayed stall until higher angles of attack. Further they
investigated the reasons for this delay, to repeat this experiment on a thick cambered aerofoil and to assess the likely
effect on wind turbine performance. Bhushan S Patil et al[8] has performed CFD analysis of wind turbine at various
angle of attack and different Reynolds number for blade NACA0012. From literature survey, it is observed that, study
of lift and drag forces on aerofoil, for very low Reynolds number at different angle of attack is not explode more. In this
present work an attempt is made to study the Lift and Drag forces on a wind turbine blade for very low Reynolds
number i.e.4000 and different angle of attack. In present work NACA0018 airfoil profile is considered for analysis of
wind turbine blade. The Lift and Drag forces are calculated at different angle of attack from 0o to 80o for Reynolds
number is 4000 and also for two different chord i.e. 15cm and 25cm lengths by computational fluid dynamics analysis.
Page 1
1.1 Lift Coefficient (CL):- It is a dimensionless coefficient that relates the lift generated by aerofoil, the dynamic
pressure of the fluid flow around aerofoil, and a reference area associated with the body. This is given as follows
L
CL =
CL
1 2 A
2
1.2 Drag Coefficient (CD): It is a dimensionless quantity that is used to quantify the drag or resistance of an object in a
fluid environment such as air for aerofoil. This is given as follows
D
CD
1
CD
1.3 Angle Of Attack ( ): The angle of attack is the angle between an airfoil cord line and the oncoming air.
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Angle of attack
Lift coefficient
Drag coefficient
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0.06
0.13
0.21
0.49
0.3
0.18
0.12
0.10
0.04
0.06
0.09
0.15
0.13
0.24
0.118
0.29
From observation table and graphs on next pages it observed that if same Reynolds number lift coefficient increase with
increase in angle of attack and it reaches maximum value suddenly decreases, this phenomena called as stalling.
Page 5
Angle of attack
Lift coefficient
Drag coefficient
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.13
0.24
0.18
0.09
0.08
0.02
0.06
0.08
0.21
0.16
0.24
0.28
0.32
From observation table and graphs on next pages it observed that if same Reynolds number lift coefficient increase with
increase in angle of attack and it reaches maximum value suddenly decreases, this phenomena called as stalling.
Page 6
4.8 Validations and comparison of experimental and CFD results for NACA0018-15 cm and 25 cm:
4.8.1 NACA0018-15 CM:
Table No. 3
Angle of attack
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
LIFT CFD
0.1521
0.278
0.3638
0.6
0.5
0.3494
0.2692
0.1693
Error. %
0.0921
0.148
0.1538
0.11
0.2
0.1694
0.1492
0.0693
From above graphs and table it has been seen that for NACA0018 -15 cm CFD results are closely matches with EXPT
results very less Error must be found i.e. 0.1 in lift coefficient and drag coefficient. Highest lift coefficient obtained by
CFD =0.6 and EXPT=0.49 at angle of attack 400. So from all CFD results are totally validated for NACA001815CM.
4.8.2 NACA0018-25CM
Table No. 4.4
Page 7
Angle of attack
Drag CFD
ERROR
10
0.02
0.0388
0.0188
20
0.06
0.0701
0.0101
30
0.08
0.1141
0.0341
40
0.21
0.1651
-0.0449
50
0.16
0.2188
0.0588
60
0.24
0.3167
0.0767
70
0.28
0.4414
0.1614
80
0.32
0.6219
0.3019
From above graphs and table it has been seen that for NACA0018 -2 5 cm CFD results are closely matches with EXPT
results very less Error must be found i.e. 0.1 in lift coefficient and drag coefficient. Highest lift coefficient obtained by
CFD =0.3005and EXPT=0.24 at angle of attack 500. So from all CFD results are totally validated for NACA0018-25
CM.
Table No. 4.6
Page 8
5. CONCLUSION
1.
2.
3.
4
5.
CFD analysis is carried out for blade profile NACA0018 and Reynolds 4000 and eight different angles of attack
10o to 80o for two different chord length ( i.e. 15 cm, 25cm)
It is also observed that for same chord length and same Reynolds number lift coefficient increase with increase in
angle of attack and it reaches maximum value suddenly decreases, This phenomena called as stalling.
It has been seen that drag coefficient increase with increasing angle of attack and it reaches maximum value at
angle of attack 800, in every case.
So NACA0018 with chord length 15 cm shows highest lift coefficient=0.62at angle of attack 400 and RE=4000
among all chord length and all Reynolds number and all blade profile used.
It has been found that NACA0018 blade profile with 15 cm Chord length gives maximum lift coefficient =0.6 and
Drag coefficient = 0.099 at angle of attack 400. So this values used in theoretical analysis to find out power
coefficient values.
Acknowledgment
I am highly greatly thankful to the Principal, Dr. H. N. Kudal and Dr. K. B. Kale, project guide and Head of
Department of Mechanical Engineering, P.D.V.V.P.COE, Ahmednagar for providing guidance and all possible help
during investigation of various experiments performed.
References
[1] Sunada S., Sakaguchi A., Kawachi K. (1997). Airfoil section characteristics at a low Reynolds number. Journal of
Fluids Engineering, 119, 129-135.
[2] Sunada S., Yasuda T., Yasuda K., Kawachi K., (2002) Comparison of wing characteristics at an ultralow
Reynolds number. Journal of Aircraft, 39, 331-338.
[3] NazmulHaque, Mohammad Ali, IsmatAra, Experimental investigation on the performance of NACA 4412
aerofoil with curved leading edge planform, Procedia Engineering 105( 2015 ) 232 240, Elsevier.
[4] MdFarhad Ismail, Krishna Vijayaraghavan, The effects of aerofoil profile modification on a vertical axis wind
turbine performance, Energy 80 (2015) 20e31, Elsevier.
[5]
J.M. Rainbird, J. Peir, J.M.R. Graham, Blockage-tolerant wind tunnel measurements for a NACA 0012 at high
angles of attack, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 145 (2015) 209218,
[6] N. Rostamzadeh, R.M. Kelso, B.B. Dally, Z.F. Tian , An Experimental and Computational Study of Flow over a
NACA 0021 Airfoil with Wavy Leading Edge Modification 18 th Australasian Fluid Mechanics conference
,Australia 3-7 December 2012.
[7] K. E. Swalwell, J. Sheridan and W. H. Melbourne, The Effect of Turbulence Intensity on Stall of the NACA 0021
Aerofoil 14 th Australasian Fluid Mechanics conference, Australia 10-14 December 2001.
[8] Bhushan S Patil , Hitesh R thakare , Computational fluid Dynamics of wind turbine blade at various angle of
attack and different Reynolds number, Procedia Engineering volume -127 ( 2015 ) pp.1363 1369.
Page 9