Daan vs. Sandiganbayan

Article 171 Falsification of public officer
Article 172 Falsification by private individuals and use of

falsified documents
Plea bargaining
Daan vs. Sandiganbayan
Joselito Raniero J. Daan, petitioner
vs.
The Hon. Sandiganbayan
(Fourth Division), respondent
GR Nos. 163972-77
March 28, 2008
Ponente: Austria-Martinez, J.
Nature of the Case:
Certiorari and prohibition
Brief:
Petitioner, accused with the crime of malversation of public funds by
falsification, questions the denial of the Sandiganbayan of his plea
bargaining proposal. The Supreme Court reversed the decision of the
Sandiganbayan.
Facts:
Petitioner, together with Mayor Kuizon were charged for three counts of
malversation of public funds by falsifying the time book and payrolls for
given period making it appear that some laborers worked on the
construction of the new municipal hall building of Bato, Leyte. In
addition to the charge for malversation, the accused were also indicted
for three counts of falsification of public document by a public officer or
employee.
In the falsification cases, the accused offered to withdraw their plea of
not guilty and substitute the same with a plea of guilty, provided, the
mitigating circumstances of confession or plea of guilt and voluntary
surrender will be appreciated in their favor. In the alternative, if such
proposal is not acceptable, said accused proposed instead to substitute
their plea of not guilty to the crime of falsification of public document by
a public officer or employee with a plea of guilty, but to the lesser crime
of falsification of a public document by a private individual. On the other
hand, in the malversation cases, the accused offered to substitute their
plea of not guilty thereto with a plea of guilty, but to the lesser crime of
failure of an accountable officer to render accounts.
Insofar as the falsification cases are concerned, the prosecution found as
acceptable the proposal of the accused to plead guilty to the lesser
crime of falsification of public document by a private individual for it will
strengthen the cases against the principal accused, Mayor Kuizon who
appears to be the mastermind of these criminal acts. However, the
Sandiganbayan denied petitioners Motion to Plea Bargain, despite
favorable recommendation by the prosecution, on the main ground that
no cogent reason was presented to justify its approval. Likewise, it
denied petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration.
Issue:
Whether the lesser offense of falsification of a public document by a
private individual is necessary included in the crime of falsification of
public document by a public officer, hence petitioner may plead guilty to
the former
Actions of the Court:
Office of the Special Prosecutor: Granted
Sandiganbayan: Denied
SC: Granted
Court Rationale:
Yes.
The lesser offenses of Falsification by Private Individuals and Failure to Render
Account by an Accountable Officer are necessarily included in the crimes of
Falsification of Public Documents and Malversation of Public Funds, respectively,
with which petitioner was originally charged.
An offense may be said to necessarily include another when some of the
essential elements or ingredients of the former as alleged in the
complaint or information constitute the latter. And vice versa, an offense
may be said to be necessarily included in another when the essential
ingredients of the former constitute or form part of those constituting
the latter (Art. 171 vis-a-vis Art. 172).
Under Article 171, paragraph 4 of the Revised Penal Code, for the crime
of Falsification of Public Documents through an untruthful narration of
facts to be established, the following elements must concur:
(a) the offender makes in a document untruthful statements in a
narration of facts;
(b) the offender has a legal obligation to disclose the truth of the facts
narrated;
(c) the facts narrated by the offender are absolutely false; and
(d) the perversion of truth in the narration of facts was made with the
wrongful intent of injuring a third person.
Falsification by Private Individuals penalized under Article 172,
paragraph 1 of the Revised Penal Code has the following elements:
(a) the offender is a private individual or a public officer or employee
who did not take advantage of his official position;
(b) the offender committed any of the acts of falsification enumerated
under Article 171 of the Revised Penal Code; and
(c) the falsification was committed in a public or official or commercial
document.
In this case, the allegations in the Informations filed against petitioner
are sufficient to hold petitioner liable for the lesser offenses. In the
charge for Falsification of Public Documents, petitioner may plead guilty
to the lesser offense of Falsification by Private Individuals inasmuch as
it does not appear that petitioner took advantage of his official
position in allegedly falsifying the timebook and payroll of the
Municipality of Bato, Leyte. In the same vein, he may plead guilty for
rendering account by an accountable officer instead of malversation of
public funds.
Therefore, that some of the essential elements of offenses charged in
this case likewise constitute the lesser offenses, then petitioner may
plead guilty to such lesser offenses.
Moreover, petitioner is not an accountable officer in that the nature of

his duty as foreman/timekeeper does not permit or require possession or
custody of local government funds, not to mention that petitioner has
already restituted the amount ofP18,860.00 involved in this case.
SC Ruling:
WHEREFORE, the petition is GRANTED. The Resolutions dated March 25,
2004 and May 31, 2004 are SET ASIDE. The Sandiganbayan is hereby
ORDERED to grant petitioner's Motion to Plea Bargain.Let records of this
case be REMANDED to the Sandiganbayan for further proceedings in
accordance with this Decision.
Additional Info:
Plea bargaining in criminal cases is a process whereby the accused and
the prosecution work out a mutually satisfactory disposition of the case
subject to court approval. It usually involves the defendant's pleading
guilty to a lesser offense or to only one or some of the counts of a multicount indictment in return for a lighter sentence than that for the graver
charge.

Daan vs. Sandiganbayan

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Daan vs. Sandiganbayan

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Daan vs. Sandiganbayan

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Article 171 Falsification of public officer

Article 172 Falsification by private individuals and use of

Moreover, petitioner is not an accountable officer in that the nature of

You might also like