Damage Control
Damage Control
Damage Control
BEST PRACTICES
AFLOAT TRAINING GROUP
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION ONE INTRODUCTION
Afloat Training Group Mission
1.1
2.1
2.4
CCOL/Space Inspection
2.8
Yoke/Zebra Sample
2.10
2.11
2.14
3.1
3.2
3.3
DCTT Effectiveness-Navy
3.8
3.11
4.1
CBR
4.16
b.
DCTT:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
Repair Parties:
1)
2)
3)
1-1
c.
d.
4)
5)
6)
2)
3)
2)
3)
4)
Provide with informal material deficiency
assessment.
5)
e.
2)
1-2
NSN
9H 4230-01-276-1905
9H 6910-01-194-2227
9H 6910-01-193-5047
9H 6910-01-194-0378
9H 6910-01-193-5045
1-4
1-5
SECTION TWO
LIST OF COMMON CCOL AND MATERIAL DISCREPANCIES:
The following list is provided to show some of the more
common CCOL and material discrepancies found on U.S. Navy
ships and U.S. Coast Guard cutters during material condition
evaluations.
1.
2.
3.
4.
6.
7.
b. Heading:
2-1
c. Fitting:
d. Classed:
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
16.
17.
18.
2-2
19.
NLP
No label plate.
20.
21.
NOTE:
2-3
2-4
Underway replenishment
2-5
b.
Vertical replenishment
c.
Air operations
d.
Amphibious operations
e.
2-6
2-7
CCOL/SPACE INSPECTION
DEPARTMENT _____ DATE ________ COMPARTMENT NUMBER ____________
Y=YES/N=NO
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
2-8
Y=YES/N=NO
13. Are fittings found OOC or out of adjustment
properly entered in the OOC list of the DC
closure log?
14. Are the label plates correct? (Number of fitting,
noun name of compt. you are entering and compt.
number)
15. Are gaskets (0 gap), knife edges & wedges free of
paint?
16. Are the fittings, which are required to be closed
for the material condition, set on the ship
closed?
NOTES:________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
2-9
BULLSEYE ______
________
CCOL ______
COLOR ______
MAJOR ______
DATE
________
MINOR ______
USS/USCG
_________________
BULLSEYE------------------------->
CCOL-------------------------------->
BULLSEYE------------------------->
CCOL-------------------------------->
BULLSEYE------------------------->
CCOL-------------------------------->
BULLSEYE------------------------->
CCOL-------------------------------->
2-10
1.
MAJOR
C. GASKET MISSING,
X
X
HOLES
3.
4.
X
X
MINOR
B. CLOSURE DEVICE
OR VALVE MISSING
C. INOPERATIVE, FROZEN
2-11
6.
X
X
FIREMAIN VALVES
B. VALVE INOPERATIVE
C. HANDWHEEL MISSING
2-12
2-13
2-15
SECTION THREE
DCTT BRIEF PREPARATION
It is recommended that every DCTT member participate in
writing the Battle Problem scenarios, Multi hit integrated
scenarios, CBR-D drills, and At-Sea Fire Party scenarios. Do
not let the same member write all the drills.
Battle Problem Development Sheets are a recommend and
useful tool. Used in conjunction with and overview sheet,
which includes the geopolitical situation, training objective,
safetys, simulations, ORM, degraded equipment, time-line, and
COs signature. This will make writing a multi-hit scenario
simple.
The following page is an example of a Battle Problem
Development Sheet, which can be tailored to your ship.
3-1
FIRE
COMPT(S):
/ DUTY SEC:
FLOODING/PROGRESSIVE FLOODING
COMPT:
/
SOURCE:
DEPTH:
/HOLDING
INSTALLED SYS:
EFFECTIVE/INEFFECTIVE
CLEAN / CONTAMINATED:
FLOODED SOLID:
/
/
FIRE BOUNDARIES
PA
PF
IN RISING
FLOODING BOUNDARIES
SA
SA
FT
PA
PF
SF
SF
DECK & BELOW
DECK & ABOVE
SOURCE OF FLOODING:
SMOKE BOUNDARIES
STRUCTURAL DAMAGE
FT
COMPT
IN
HOLE
DEPTH OF FFW
FRAME:
PORT/STBD/OVHD/DECK
ATMOSPHERIC TEST
02
COMB
TOXIC
COMPT
FT
SPLIT SM
IN X
CRACK
IN
/ NON-VITAL
FRAME:
PORT/STBD/OVHD/DECK
EQUIPMENT:
RUPTURED
PIPING
COMPT
FITTING TYPE/#
COMPT:
FRAME:
X
PORT/STBD/OVHD/DECK
CRACK
SAG / BUCKLE
COMPT
FRAME:
PORT/STBD/C/L
FRAME:
FT
PORT/STBD/OVHD/DECK
PANTING BULKHEAD
COMPT
JUMPER
TO
FRAME:
COMPT:
3-2
PORT/STBD/OVHD/DECK
COMPARTMENT DEMOLISHED
/
Fire C
PROPS
Red streamers
9905-00-194-9698
Red rags
7290-00-044-9281
6230-00-729-8881
Flashlight
6230-00-926-4331
Chemlights
6260-01-178-5559
Strobe light
6230-00-067-5209
Hot potato
Heat Gun
4940-01-286-7079
6230-00-010-4506
Fire Out
Smoke
Smoke Machine
1040-01-302-0470
White rags
7290-00-044-9281
White streamers
9905-00-684-4645
Black rags
7290-00-044-9281
Blue rags
7290-00-044-9281
3-3
SIMULATION
PROPS
Hang Fire
Activation of Plug
Testing of Firefighting
Agent
Blue streamer
9905-01-056-5319
7920-00-044-9281
CO2
7290-00-044-9281
AFFF
PKP
Purple rag
Desmoking
Firefighting Water on
Deck
AFFF/FFW in Bilge
4 by 4 blocks painted
blue for FFW and topped
by white to the depth of
AFFF (can be various
size blocks) Grease
pencil markings on handheld bilge level
indicator
Jammed WTD/WTH
Hot Surface
Bulkhead/Deck
7290-00-044-9281
3-4
SIMULATION
PROPS
Electrical Isolation
OBA Activation
AFFF Activation
Panting Bulkhead/Sagging
Overhead
DC Plate/cardboard/thin
sheet metal inserted
between frames
Tap on extinguisher
Blue streamers
Blue rags
7920-00-044-9281
Blue chemlight
6260-01-178-5559
Dewatering
3-5
SIMULATION
PROPS
Toxic Gas
Man Down
OSCAR or actual
personnel
Injuries
Halon Effective
Halon Ineffective
3-6
1H 1365-01-367-5695
6910-00-540-6378
SIMULATION
PROPS
AFFF usage
Halon/CO2 Activation/
Release
Operate pressure
switches for vent
shutdowns and alarms
IAW MSFD
Loss of Firemain
PKP Empty
Hazard
3-7
DATE: ____________________
Drill/Exercise conducted:
Evaluator:
Ref: (a) COMNAVSURFLANTINST 3502.2 Series
(b) COMNAVAIRLANTINST 3500.20 Series
A. PRE-EXERCISE BRIEF
EFFECTIVE o
INEFFECTIVE o
YES / NO
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
3-8
B. IMPOSITION OF EXERCISE
EFFECTIVE o
INEFFECTIVE o
YES / NO
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
INEFFECTIVE o
YES / NO
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
3-9
INEFFECTIVE o
YES / NO
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
3-10
INSTRUCTOR SIGNATURE:
TLO SIGNATURE:
COMMANDER ATLANTIC AREA
ASSESSMENT/TRAINING/CERTIFICATION CRITERIA
FOR
ONBOARD TRAINING TEAM END OF TSTA ASSESSMENT
Ref: Cutter Training and Qualification Manual (m3502.4E).
USCGC:
OBTTs INVOLVED:
(circle)
DATE:
DCTT
ETT
NSTT
CSTT
CTT
ATT
YES NO
TRAINING TEAM PLANNING.
( ) ( ) 1. Was there a written drill plan?
( ) ( ) 2. Was the drill plan complete (i.e. training
objectives, training team assignments, etc.)?
( ) ( ) 3. Was a pre-brief/walk-through conducted as
appropriate?
( ) ( ) 4. Are the drills realistic, as it relates to normal
operations?
( ) ( ) 5. Do drills use realistic simulations?
( ) ( ) 6. Did training team minimize simulations?
( ) ( ) 7. Was operational risk management addressed as
appropriate?
( ) ( ) 8. Was the drill plan approved and signed by the CO
prior to the brief?
( ) ( ) 9. Are all props standardized throughout all training
teams?
Comments (required for no checks)
3-11
YES NO
BRIEFING
( ) ( ) 10. Did training team muster with sufficient lead time
and representation to cover all areas?
( ) ( ) 11. Were areas of responsibility assigned and
understood?
( ) ( ) 12. Did the training team conduct a safety walk through
of equipment and areas before the drill/instruction
and discuss corrections?
( ) ( ) 13. Are all training team members proficient in
evaluating areas they are training?
( ) ( ) 14. Did the training teams discuss equipment, and
changes to equipment status, and OCC equipment?
( ) ( ) 15. Were training time out procedures discussed?
( ) ( ) 16. Was the brief held in a quiet area of the cutter
and away from the rest of the crew?
( ) ( ) 17. Was Operational Risk Management discussed as
appropriate?
( ) ( ) 18. Were safety precautions and unusual situations
discussed (i.e. heat stress, hearing conservation,
etc.)?
( ) ( ) 19. Were the methods of disclosure, simulations and
props discussed?
( ) ( ) 20. Was the time line discussed (i.e. start, stop time,
schedule of events, imposition methods)?
( ) ( ) 21. Was the training level briefed (i.e. walk through,
training, evaluation)?
( ) ( ) 22. Did the brief discuss specific training objective?
Comments (required for no checks):
3-12
YES NO
CONDUCT OF DRILL
( ) ( ) 23. Were all safety walk through discrepancies
corrected prior to drill?
( ) ( ) 24. Was time line executed as briefed?
( ) ( ) 25. Were realistic casualties/situations imposed?
( ) ( ) 26. Were imposed casualties in accordance with the
brief?
( ) ( ) 27. Did the training team recognize and prevent/correct
unsafe conditions of personnel and equipment?
( ) ( ) 28. Did the training team maintain control and conduct
the drill as briefed?
( ) ( ) 29. Did the training team conduct watchstander training
as required?
( ) ( ) 31. Was prompting appropriate/adequate for the
watchstander's knowledge level?
( ) ( ) 32. Did the training team use effective means to check
the watchstander's knowledge (i.e. CCM, MSFD,
tasking sheets, etc.)?
( ) ( ) 33. Did the training team members have effective comms
with each other?
( ) ( ) 34. Were props delivered realistically (no pre-stage or
pre-disclosure)?
( ) ( ) 35. Did watchstanders recognize all props used by
training teams?
Comments (required for no checks):
3-13
YES NO
DEBRIEF/EVALUATION
( ) ( ) 36. Were timely debriefs conducted with training team
members?
( ) ( ) 37. Did the training team have proper representation to
cover all areas at debrief?
( ) ( ) 38. Did the training team monitor all areas of the
drill?
( ) ( ) 39. Did the training team accurately assess/grade the
drill?
( ) ( ) 40. Did the training team work to identify
watchstanders weaknesses during the drill?
( ) ( ) 41. Did the training team plan or take action to
correct watchstanders weaknesses?
( ) ( ) 42. Did the training team identify its own weaknesses?
( ) ( ) 43. Did the training team plan or take action to
correct their own weaknesses?
( ) ( ) 44. Did the training team identify
material/documentation discrepancies during the
drill (i.e. CCOLs, manuals, bills)?
( ) ( ) 45. Did the training team work to correct recurring
material discrepancies?
( ) ( ) 46. Were training objectives met?
( ) ( ) 47. Did the training team have sufficient props to
support the drill?
( ) ( ) 48. Did the training team provide a timely debrief with
the watchstanders?
( ) ( ) 49. Was ORM assessed/disclosed (accurate/not accurate)?
Comments (required for no checks):
INSTRUCTOR SIGNATURE:
TLO SIGNATURE:
3-14
SECTION FOUR
DAMAGE CONTROL FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
* INVESTIGATORS
1. WHAT METHOD OF INVESTIGATION IS USED TO LOCATE DAMAGE IN
TANKS AND VOIDS?
ANS: SOUNDING AND USING THE LIQUID LOAD LIST.
2. WHY IS IT IMPORTANT TO HAVE AN UP TO DATE LIQUID LOAD LIST?
ANS: TO KNOW THE LEVEL OF TANKS AND VOIDS PRIOR TO DAMAGE.
3. HOW ARE AIR TEST FITTINGS USED TO INVESTIGATE FOR DAMAGE?
ANS: LOOSEN AND LISTEN FOR AIR ESCAPING OR WATER AROUND
PIPE.
4. AIR ESCAPING FROM AN AIR TEST FITTING INDICATES WHAT KIND
OF DAMAGE?
ANS: POSSIBLE FLOODING.
5. WHAT METHOD IS USED TO CHECK FOR HOT DOORS AND HATCHES?
ANS: REMOVE GLOVE AND CHECK WITH BACK OF HAND IN FROM
DOOR.
6. WHAT SHOULD BE USED ON A SOUNDING TAPE WHEN SOUNDING A FUEL
TANK?
ANS: WATER INDICATING PASTE.
7. WHAT ARE THE FOUR PRINCIPLES OF INVESTIGATION?
ANS: INVESTIGATE THOROUGHLY, CAUTIOUSLY, REPORT QUICKLY AND
CLEARLY. REPEAT YOUR INVESTIGATION.
8. WHAT SHOULD BE USED ON A SOUNDING TAPE WHEN SOUNDING A
WATER TANK?
ANS: CHALK.
9. SHOULD YOU SOUND A FUEL TANK AND A WATER TANK WITH THE SAME
SOUNDING TAPE?
ANS: NO. THE FUEL RESIDUE ON THE TAPE WOULD CONTAMINATE THE
FRESH WATER.
10. HOW WOULD YOU CHECK A BULKHEAD FOR FLOODING ON THE OTHER
SIDE?
ANS: TAP UP THE BULKHEAD LISTENING FOR A CHANGE IN SOUND.
LOOK FOR SWEATING ON THE BULKHEAD.
4-1
4-2
4-3
4-4
4-5
4-6
(PECU)
1. WHAT IS THE BURN RATE OF THE FUEL RODS USED WITH THE PECU?
ANS: APPROXIMATELY 3O INCHES PER MINUTE.
4-7
4-8
4-9
4-10
4-11
4-13
4-14
4-15
4-16
4-17
4-18
4-19
4-20
4-21
4-22
4-23
* PERSONAL DECONTAMINATION
M-291 DECON KIT
64. HOW DOES THE M-291 DECON KIT DECONTAMINATE?
ANS: THOROUGH PHYSICAL REMOVAL, ABSORPTION, AND
NEUTRALIZATION.
65. WHAT PRECAUTIONS MUST BE TAKEN WHEN USING THE M-291 DECON
KIT?
ANS: FOR EXTERNAL USE ONLY, KEEP DECON POWDER EYES, CUTS
AND WOUNDS. DECON FACE AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE, AVOID
INHALING THE POWDER.
66. HOW MANY PACKETS ARE IN THE M-291 DECON KIT?
ANS: SIX, ENOUGH FOR THREE COMPLETE SKIN
DECONTAMINATIONS.
* SELF-AID/BUDDY-AID
67. WHAT ARE THE FIRST SYMPTOMS OF NERVE AGENT POISONING?
ANS: UNEXPLAINED NASAL SECRETION, TIGHTNESS OF CHEST,
SHORTNESS OF BREATH, CONSTRICTION OF PUPILS,
MUSCULAR TWITCHING OR NAUSEA AND ABDOMINAL CRAMPS.
68. WHAT DEPARTMENT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF
BIOLOGICAL WARFARE AGENTS?
ANS: MEDICAL.
69. WHAT IS THE SELF-AID FOR BLOOD AGENTS?
ANS: DON MASK IMMEDIATELY AND SEEK MEDICAL AID.
70. WHAT IS THE SELF-AID FOR BLISTER AGENTS?
ANS: EYES SHOULD BE FLUSHED WITH CLEAN WATER AS SOON AS
POSSIBLE, USE THE M-291 DECON KIT WITH SOAP AND
WATER FOR SKIN.
71. HOW MANY AUTO-INJECTORS OF ATROPINE AND 2 PAM CHLORIDE ARE
ISSUED TO EACH PERSON AT THE THREAT OF A CHEMICAL ATTACK?
ANS: THREE ATROPINE AND THREE 2 PAM CHLORIDES.
72. ATROPINE AND 2 PAM CHLORIDE ARE ONLY USED AFTER EXPOSURE
AND SYMPTOMS OF WHAT CHEMICAL AGENT?
ANS: NERVE AGENT.
73. WHAT ARE THE SYMPTOMS CAUSED BY BLOOD AGENTS?
ANS: DIFFICULT OR RAPID BREATHING, HEADACHE, NAUSEA,
DIZZINESS AND VIOLENT CONVULSIONS.
4-24
4-25