Saudi Aramco Journal

On the Cover
A concentric tubular structure of a multi-walled carbon nanotube

(MWCNT), which can help overcome current and future extreme
drilling and production challenges.
Buckyballs: With the development of nanomaterial, a series of

interlocking hexagons and pentagons with hollow spheroids
can revolutionize the fluid and tool design due to unique
mechanical and chemical properties not seen in conventional
materials.
The Saudi Aramco Journal of Technology is

published quarterly by the Saudi Arabian Oil
Company, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, to provide
the companys scientific and engineering
communities a forum for the exchange of
ideas through the presentation of technical
information aimed at advancing knowledge
in the hydrocarbon industry.
MORE SAUDI ARAMCO JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ARTICLES

AVA I L A B L E O N T H E I N T E R N E T.
Additional articles that were submitted for publication in the Saudi Aramco Journal
of Technology are being made available online. You can read them at this link on
the Saudi Aramco Internet Website: www.saudiaramco.com/jot
EDITORIAL ADVISORS (CONTINUED)
P R O D U C T I O N C O O R D I N AT I O N
Sami A. Al-Khursani
Richard E. Doughty
Program Director, Technology
Ammar A. Nahwi
DESIGN
Manager, Research and Development Center
Pixel Creative Group, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Waleed A. Mulhim
Manager, EXPEC ARC
Complete issues of the Journal in PDF format

are available on the Internet at:
http://www.saudiaramco.com
(click on publications).
SUBSCRIPTIONS
Send individual subscription orders, address
changes (see page 77) and related questions
to:
Saudi Aramco Public Relations Department
JOT Distribution
Box 5000
Dhahran 31311, Saudi Arabia
Website: www.saudiaramco.com
EDITORIAL ADVISORS
Zuhair A. Al-Hussain
CONTRIBUTIONS
Relevant articles are welcome. Submission
guidelines are printed on the last page.
Please address all manuscript and editorial
correspondence to:
EDITOR
William E. Bradshaw
The Saudi Aramco Journal of Technology
C-86, Wing D, Building 9156
Tel: +966-013-876-0498
E-mail: william.bradshaw.1@aramco.com.sa
Unsolicited articles will be returned only
when accompanied by a self-addressed
envelope.
Vice President, Southern Area Oil Operations
Ibraheem Assaadan
Executive Director, Exploration
Abdullah M. Al-Ghamdi
General Manager, Northern Area Gas Operations
Salahaddin H. Dardeer
Manager, Jiddah Refinery
ISSN 1319-2388.
Khalid A. Al-Falih
President & CEO, Saudi Aramco
Nasser A. Al-Nafisee
Executive Director, Corporate Affairs
Essam Z. Tawfiq
General Manager, Public Affairs
COPYRIGHT 2015
A R A M C O S E R V I C E S C O M PA N Y
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
No articles, including art and illustrations, in
the Saudi Aramco Journal of Technology,
except those from copyrighted sources, may
be reproduced or printed without the
written permission of Saudi Aramco. Please
submit requests for permission to reproduce
items to the editor.
gratefully acknowledges the assistance,
contribution and cooperation of numerous
operating organizations throughout the
company.
Saudi Aramco
Spring 2015
A quarterly publication of the Saudi Arabian Oil Company
Contents
Nanotechnology Can Overcome the Critical Issues

of Extremely Challenging Drilling and Production
Environments
Dr. Md. Amanullah and Dr. Jothibasu Ramasamy
Intelligent Distributed Acoustic Sensing for In-well

Monitoring
13
Dr. Jinjiang Xiao, Mahmoud Farhadiroushan, Andy Clarke,

Rami A. Abdalmohsen, Essam M. Al-Alyan, Dr. Tom R. Parker,
Dr. Janti Shawash and H. Craig Milne
New Generation Inflow Control Device to Maximize Well

24
Productivity during Every Phase of a Wells Life
Hemant K. Sharma and Abdulrahman K. Al-Mulhim
Technology Test Site: Value Proposition for a Live Field

Laboratory
34
Modiu L. Sanni, John T. Allen, Scott S. Jennings, Dr. Michael A. Jervis,

Christopher B. Ayadiuno, Razally M. Ali and Husain N. Al-Najrani
Intelligent Field Real-Time Data Reliability Key

Performance Indices
46
Abdulrahman A. Al-Amer, Naser A. Al-Naser,

Muhammad M. Al-Gosayir and Waleed Y. Al-Awadh
Use of the Rietveld Method for Describing Structure and

Texture in XRD Data of Scale Deposits Formed in Oil and
Gas Pipelines: An Important Industrial Challenge
52
Dr. Husin Sitepu, Dr. Syed R. Zaidi and Dr. Shouwen Shen
A Novel Semi-Analytical Solution for Transient Pressure

Data Interpretation of a Fractured Well in an Asymmetric
60
Reservoir
Faisal M. Al-Thawad and Dr. Mahmoud Jamiolahmady
Use of Nano-Emulsion Surfactants during Hydraulic

Fracturing Treatments
Mashhoor S. Al-Anazi, Dr. Mohammed H. Al-Khaldi, Alhasan B. Fuseni
and Khalid M. Al-Marshad
67
Journal of Technology
THE SAUDI ARAMCO JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY
Nanotechnology Can Overcome the

Critical Issues of Extremely Challenging
Drilling and Production Environments
Authors: Dr. Md. Amanullah and Dr. Jothibasu Ramasamy
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Due to a progressively decreasing trend in finding easy oil and

gas, the industry is shifting to high risk and extremely challenging drilling environments to meet global energy demands.
This is reflected by increasingly higher drilling activities in
complex geological areas, deepwater environments, extreme
high-pressure/high temperature (HPHT) conditions, etc. The
increasing shift from vertical to deviated, horizontal or extended
reach drilling; from single lateral to multilateral drilling; from
conventional completions to coiled tubing (CT) or casing while
drilling; and from rotary drilling to downhole motor drilling,
etc., also dictates the development of highly reliable tools and
equipment for a trouble-free drilling operation. Moreover, critical issues such as HPHT, complex geology, greater water depth,
and high rig rental and operating costs make oil and gas exploration and exploitation today highly risky and extremely costly.
Therefore, drilling operations in these extreme environments need
reliable, chemically resistive and mechanically stable surface
and subsurface tools and equipment with short- and long-term
fail-safe capability to overcome the technical limitations of
conventional tools.
Nanotechnology has demonstrated that nanostructured materials with special mechanical, chemical, thermal, electrical and
tribological properties exhibit significantly higher strength,
hardness, material toughness, corrosion resistance, ductility,
elastic properties, thermal stability and heat conductivity, etc.,
compared to conventional materials, in spite of having the same
chemical and material compositions. As these materials have a
very low density and high mechanical strength, and show superior chemical resistance and excellent thermal stability, tailormade nanomaterials or nanocomposites either alone or in
combination with other macrostructural, microstructural and
nanostructural materials can provide much lighter equipment
with significantly higher mechanical, thermal, chemical and
tribological performance for challenging drilling environments.
This article describes the application of nanomaterials and
nanotechnology in the development of superior nano-enhanced
tools and equipment that can overcome critical operational issues
found in extreme drilling and production environments.
SPRING 2015
SAUDI ARAMCO JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY
In spite of the availability of several alternative sources of energy, hydrocarbons are still the main source of energy for the
global community and will continue to be so over the coming
years. As the numbers of readily accessible hydrocarbon basins
are diminishing quickly, and the easily recoverable oil and gas
reserves are declining rapidly, the oil and gas industry is looking for new reserves of oil and gas in every corner of the earth.
Due to the reduced chance of finding high volumes of oil and
gas resources in shallow and simple geological structures either
onshore or near offshore, there has been a progressive shift in
drilling operations from simple drilling environments to complex and challenging drilling environments. This is reflected by
increased drilling operations in deepwater and ultra-deepwater
environments, high-pressure/high temperature (HPHT) conditions, complex geological areas, etc.
Analyses of past and present oil and gas field discoveries
show that it is rarely possible today to find giant oil and gas
reserves in traditional onshore and offshore exploration areas.
According to Shihab-Eldin (2002)1, the average field size of
new discoveries in traditional onshore and offshore areas has
declined from 220 million barrels of oil equivalent (MMBoe)
per discovery in the 1960s to less than 50 MMBoe in the
1990s. As a result, the industry is now navigating new areas
having complex geology, difficult subsurface conditions,
greater water depth, etc. Because the ocean, which occupies
three quarters of the earth, shows a high prospect of hydrocarbon resources in addition to other valuable marine resources2,
exploration activities are increasing in deepwater and ultradeepwater offshore areas to meet the global energy demand.
Today, the potential of discovering future giant oil and gas
fields in deepwater environments is much higher than in onshore and shallow water environments3. Liesman (2000)4
points out that the reserves at depths approaching a mile or
more now represent the biggest single new oil resources for
world communities. Published information indicates that currently more than 20% of the worlds proven reserves are in
complex, troublesome and technically challenging offshore
geological structures. According to the production forecast of
hydrocarbon resources, about 40% to 50% of hydrocarbon
production will be from offshore fields5 with challenging
drilling and production environments. This is why the industry

needs a new generation of tools and equipment with superior
mechanical, physical, thermal and chemical stability for safe,
economic and risk-free operation in complex and challenging
drilling environments both onshore and offshore.
Due to the limited hydrocarbon production possible from
conventional vertical boreholes, operators are shifting from
vertical drilling to horizontal, extended reach and multilateral
drilling, which significantly increases the complexity of drilling
operations. The industry is also applying new drilling technologies, such as casing while drilling, expandable liner
drilling, coiled tubing (CT) drilling, etc., for safer and more
economic, efficient and trouble-free drilling operations. In addition, pioneering research on cutting-edge drilling technologies,
such as laser drilling, cavitation jet drilling, resonance drilling,
plasma drilling, thermal drilling, etc., is working to overcome
the drilling challenges in current and future drilling operations.
Technical challenges associated with development of this cuttingedge technology needed for future drilling and production in
extreme environments have created a demand for new materials
with characteristics that go well beyond the current materials
properties. As a result, the oil and gas industry is seeking a
range of new materials to use in the design of high performance
tools, equipment, sensors and instruments, seals and elastomers,
as well as for drilling, drill-in, and completion and stimulation
fluids, enabling them to overcome the technical challenges of
extreme drilling environments. According to Amanullah and
Al-Tahini (2009)6 and Amanullah (2013)7, the superior physicochemical characteristics and thermomechanical properties of
nanomaterials and the application of nanotechnology can provide a viable avenue to overcoming those challenges.
Todays added operational complexities and environmental
extremes demand radical changes in conventional tools, equipment, seals, elastomers, fluid additives, etc. For example, the
changing complexity of well profiles and their increasing horizontal reach require tools that are physically lighter but
mechanically stronger. Ultra HPHT drilling conditions demand
equipment that has higher thermal, mechanical and chemical
stability to avoid otherwise frequent failure. The seals and
elastomers used in downhole tools need superior material characteristics to remain functional in extreme drilling environments.
Similarly, the drilling, drill-in and completion fluids used in
making a borehole require chemicals and additives that are capable of preventing their short- and long-term degradation in
high temperature and high acid gas environments.
As a result, the development of extreme environment
drilling and production tools and equipment is rarely possible
using conventional microstructural materials due to their technical limits. Such development demands materials having characteristics that go far beyond current materials properties. The
superior physical, mechanical, chemical and thermal properties
of nanomaterials suggest that they can have a significant effect
on improving techniques, technologies, material properties and
fluid characteristics required in extreme drilling and production
environments. This article describes the application of nanomaterials and nanocomposites to overcome the limitation of
conventional tools, equipment, seals, elastomers and fluid systems and to eliminate or mitigate the effect of critical factors in
extreme drilling environments.
CONVENTIONAL TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT

LIMITATIONS
Figure 1 shows the thermal stability limits of various tools and
equipment used in current oil and gas exploration and exploitation. Figure 2 shows the range of pressures and temperatures likely to be encountered in normal and extreme drilling
environments around the globe. The data presented in Fig. 1
clearly shows that most of the conventional tools and equipment available for exploration and exploitation of oil and gas
resources will rarely work at temperatures above 450 F.
Analyses of current global drilling reports and activities indicate
that the pressure and temperature of extreme drilling environments can exceed 25,000 psi and 500 F in some onshore and
offshore wells. Table 1 shows the drilling and completion gaps
in the analysis data8. The data clearly shows major technology
gaps in the areas of equipment limitation and fluid stability in
HPHT conditions, reducing the likelihood of safe, economic
Fig. 1. Safe working temperature of conventional tools and equipment.
Fig. 2. Pressure and temperature regimes in normal and HPHT environments.
SPRING 2015
offers a viable solution to ensure fail-safe operation of tools

and equipment in extreme drilling environments.
COMPOSITE MATERIAL
Table 1. Drilling and completion gaps in a HPHT environment8
and trouble-free drilling operations in such an environment.

Other than pressure and temperature, factors such as borehole profile, in situ stress regime, complexity in the subsurface
geology, the nature of formation-related drilling hazards, etc.,
govern the performance and stability of the tools, equipment
and fluid systems used in extreme drilling environments. Furthermore, field experience has shown that the actual overall
stability limit of conventional tools and equipment even falls
below the company supplied stability values.
At and above the mechanical, thermal, chemical, etc., stability limit, the equipment shows speedy degradation, frequent
failure and eventually loss of functional capability due to the
severe damage, permanent deformation and rapid wear of
tools, seals and elastomers, pistons and liners, etc. The corrosion and erosion of equipment, especially severe in the presence
of high concentrations of acid gases typical of extreme drilling
environments, also dramatically reduces its lifetime. That is the
reason why the industry needs a new generation of tools,
equipment and fluid systems with superior mechanical, thermal,
chemical, etc., stability limits.
The current microstructural composite-based tools and
equipment used in oil and gas fields, and also the micro-size
drilling and completion fluid additives, often show poor performance in extreme drilling environments, such as in ultra
HPHT conditions, in deepwater and ultra-deepwater wells, in
horizontal and extended reach drilling, in high acid gas environments and in areas with complex subsurface geology. Intricate geology containing highly reactive and gumbo shales,
tectonically active zones, mobile formations and extremely
abrasive rocks often causes serious damage to conventional
tools and equipment due to the technical limits of their materials.
The need therefore is to improve the conventional material
characteristics well above their current technical limits in properties such as strength, strength-to-weight ratio, torsional resistance to failure, fatigue and wear resistance, and thermal
and chemical stability. The application of emerging nanotechnology, shown to dramatically improve the physical, mechanical, thermal and chemical properties in steel nanocomposite,
4
SPRING 2015
Composite material is composed of two or more distinct

phases of a material with each phase having different properties. The property of the composite is the combined effect of
these phase properties. One phase of the composite is the continuous phase, also known as the matrix phase. Another phase
of the composite is the noncontinuous phase, also known as
the dispersed or reinforcing phase. Due to the joint effect of
matrix and dispersed phases, the composite material has significantly different bulk properties than its constituent phases.
The dispersed phase, which is the stronger phase, is embedded
in the matrix phase. Based on the particle size of the dispersed
phase, a composite can be microstructural or nanostructural.
A composite with a nanostructural particle size is known as a
nanocomposite. According to Ajayan et al. (2003)9, nanocomposite materials can be defined as either multiphase solid materials where one or more phases have one or more dimensions
less than 100 nanometers, or solid materials that have internal
structures with nano-scale repeat distances between the different phases that make up the material. The definition can be further refined: in a simple nanocomposite, the solid material has
only one nanomaterial phase in the solid matrix, while in a
complex nanocomposite, the solid material has two or more
phases of nanomaterials in the composite material.
Nanocomposite material has physical, mechanical, chemical
and thermal properties superior to those of a micro-composite
material. This is the result of the incorporation of nano-sized
internal phases within the bulk matrix of the solid material. It
is the superior nanophase properties that cause the properties
of the nanocomposite to differ so drastically from conventional
composite materials. A critical size range of nanoparticles plays
a dominant role in achieving a particular technical effect. According to Kamigaito (1991)10, a size limit of less than 5 nm is
needed for catalytic activity; a size limit of less than 20 nm is
required to turn a hard magnetic material into a soft magnetic
material; a size limit of less than 50 nm is required for altering
the refractive index of the materials; and a size limit of less
than 100 nm is required for achieving superparamagnetism,
mechanical strengthening, matrix stiffening, deformation characteristics or dislocation behavior alterations, or movement of
fabrics and structural units.
Conventional oil and gas field tools and equipment are
made of microstructural-based composite materials and so
have severe technical limitations for achieving safe operation in
extreme drilling and production environments. Incorporation of
nanophase material in a bulk matrix can significantly enhance
the technical limits of composite material. As a result, the use
of nanocomposite materials in the oil and gas field tools and
equipment can dramatically improve their technical properties.
A variety of nanomaterials with different morphological
characteristics can be used to prepare nanocomposites for different applications.
phase material to demonstrate the effect of nanos in enhancing

the technical properties of nanocomposites.
RULE OF MIXTURES
NANOPHASE EFFECT ANALYSES
The rule of mixtures is a method to derive an approximate calculation of composite material properties; it is based on the assumption that a composite property is the volume of weighted
average of the matrix and dispersed phases. Appropriate equations based on composite mixing rules were used to calculate
the density, tensile strength and elasticity (the Youngs modulus) of a nanocomposite, and then the percentage reduction in
weight, percentage enhancement of tensile strength and percentage enhancement of stiffness (the Youngs modulus) in the
nanocomposite compared to the matrix phase material.
Tables 2, 3 and 4 show the dispersed phases weight percentage (wt%) and volume in the nanocomposite material along
with, respectively, the nanocomposites density and weight
reduction, its Youngs modulus and stiffness enhancement, and
its tensile strength enhancement, all due to the incorporation
of nanomaterial into the bulk matrix. Mass concentrations of
nanomaterial ranging from 5% to 25% were used in predicting
the changes in the physical and mechanical properties of the
nanocomposite compared to those of the original matrix phase
material. Here, steel was used as the matrix phase material and
a single-wall carbon nanotube (SWCNT) as the dispersed
Based on the theoretically derived functional relations between

the nanophase material concentration and several material
characteristics, it can be concluded that the emerging nanotechnology and the tiny nanomaterial can have a significant
effect in the design and development of superior tools and
equipment to ensure trouble-free, safe and economic drilling
and production operations in extreme environments. Due to
the enhancement of their physical, mechanical, thermal, chemical, tribological, etc., properties, nanocomposite and nano-based
additives can eliminate the detrimental effects of all of the critical factors associated with extreme drilling and production
environments.
Parameters
Steel-SWCNT 100:0
TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT WEIGHT REDUCTION

Figure 3 shows the densities of two nanomaterials (SWCNT
and a multi-wall carbon nanotube (MWCNT)) and several
conventional materials. This data indicates that the SWCNT
had the second lowest density compared to the densities of
other materials shown. Due to the lower density of the SWCNT compared to the MWCNT, it was used in the theoretical
Dispersed Phase
Weight (gm)
Dispersed Phase
Volume (cc)
Nanocomposite Density
(gm/cc)
Weight Reduction (%)
0.00
7.8
6.69
14.29
Steel-SWCNT 95:5
2.78
Steel-SWCNT 90:10
10
5.56
5.85
25.00
Steel-SWCNT 85:15
15
8.33
5.20
33.33
Steel-SWCNT 80:20
20
11.11
4.68
40.00
Steel-SWCNT 75:25
25
13.89
4.25
45.45
Dispersed Phase
Volume (gm)
Nanocomposite
Youngs Modulus (GA)
Stiffness
Enhancement (%)
Matrix Phase Density = 7.8 gm/cc
Dispersed Phase Density = 1.8
Table 2. Weight reduction based on wt% of dispersed phase in the matrix phase
Parameters
Dispersed Phase
Weight (gm)
Steel-SWCNT 100:0
208
Steel-SWCNT 95:5
2.78
317.94
52.86
Steel-SWCNT 90:10
10
5.56
400.40
92.50
Steel-SWCNT 85:15
15
8.33
464.53
123.33
Steel-SWCNT 80:20
20
11.11
515.84
148.00
Steel-SWCNT 75:25
25
13.89
557.82
168.18
Matrix Phase Youngs Modulus = 208 (GA)
Dispersed Phase Youngs Modulus = 800 (GA)
Table 3. Stiffness enhancement based on wt% of dispersed phase in the matrix phase
SPRING 2015
Parameters
Dispersed Phase
Weight (gm)
Dispersed Phase
Volume (cc)
Nanocomposite Tensile
Strength (GA)
Strength
Enhancement (%)
0.4
Steel-SWCNT 100:0
Steel-SWCNT 95:5
2.78
5.90
1,374
Steel-SWCNT 90:10
10
5.56
10.02
2,405
Steel-SWCNT 85:15
15
8.33
13.23
3,207
Steel-SWCNT 80:20
20
11.11
15.79
3,848
Steel-SWCNT 75:25
25
13.89
17.89
4,373
Matrix Phase Tensile Strength = 0.4 (GA)
Dispersed Phase Tensile Strength = 30 (GPa)
Table 4. Tensile strength enhancement based on wt% of dispersed phase in the matrix phase
Fig. 3. Density of several conventional and nano-based materials.
blending of different wt% of nanomaterials with steel to prepare hypothetical nanocomposite samples and evaluate the
tiny nano effect on the mighty steel phase of a carbon nanotube (CNT) steel nanocomposite. The mixing rule theory and
equation was used for composite density calculation to determine the reduction in density due to the incorporation of a
particular percentage of nanophase material into the bulk
matrix of the steel.
Figure 4 shows the percentage reduction of nanocomposite
weight with respect to the weight of pure steel material. The
data clearly shows that the blending of different percentages of
SWCNTs with steel can dramatically reduce the composite
density and so can provide an avenue for manufacturing lightweight equipment, tools and tubular for oil and gas field applications, especially important for extreme drilling environments
that require lighter but stronger tools and equipment. Further,
Fig. 4. Weight reduction potential of tools and equipment using nanocomposite

materials.
SPRING 2015
the same application of nanomaterials in the manufacture of

nanocomposites to develop lightweight but stronger casing,
drillpipes, CT, surface equipment and other rig accessories will
enhance the safe operational limits of these tools and equipment in extreme drilling environments. As a result, the challenges associated with using conventional tools and equipment
in horizontal and extended reach drilling, HPHT drilling,
deepwater drilling, casing while drilling, etc., will be removed
or reduced significantly.
Figure 4 also shows the theoretical values of weight reduction due to the incorporation of specific concentrations of a
nanophase SWCNT into the bulk steel matrix. The data
clearly shows a progressive decrease in the weight of the SWCNT steel nanocomposite with increasing concentrations of
the nanophase material. But even small concentrations are effective; the incorporation of 5% SWCNTs (w/w) into the steel
matrix shows a weight reduction of more than 14%. Therefore,
the designs for tools and equipment, including drillpipes and
casing, measurement while drilling/logging while drilling
(MWD/LWD) sensors, mud motors, CT, etc., that use the SWCNT steel nanocomposite or similar nanocomposite materials
will reduce the equipment weight significantly. The data further
indicates that the use of a steel matrix nanocomposite with as
little as 5% SWCNT will provide tools and equipment more
than 14% lighter compared to conventional tools and
tubular.
The lighter weight and enhanced strength bring many benefits. For example, the nanocomposite-based drillpipe will create lower torque and drag requirement problems, along with a
reduction in the frictional resistance while drilling. This type of
drillpipe will also allow high weight transfer to the bit as this
now will have no detrimental effect on drillpipe strength. Indeed, the nanocompsite will enhance the mechanical strength
of the pipes significantly, which will be discussed later. The
lighter weight and higher mechanical properties, in turn, will
extend the technical limits of extended reach drilling operations,
enabling longer laterals. The lower frictional resistance will
improve the rate of penetration (ROP), with a positive impact
on well construction cost. Moreover, the lightweight tubular
will provide greater ease of handling in the assembling and
Fig. 5. Tensile strength of several conventional and nano-based materials.
disassembling of the different components of surface and subsurface tools and equipment. Due to the weight reduction of
surface and subsurface tools and equipment, drillpipes and
casings, and other auxiliary tools and equipment, operators
can use a smaller rig for drilling and workover operations
along with less energy.
TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT STRENGTH ENHANCEMENT

Figure 5 shows a bar graph comparing the tensile strength of
the two nanomaterials and several conventional materials, including steel. The data indicates that SWCNT and MWCNT
have the highest tensile strength compared to the tensile
strength of other materials. (To maintain consistency with the
theoretical nanocomposite preparation used in the earlier
analyses of the nanophase effect, SWCNTs were used in the
theoretical nanocomposite preparation here, even though the
MWCNT has similar strength properties.) A different wt% of
SWCNTs was used in the theoretical blending of the dispersed
phase nanomaterial with the continuous phase steel to prepare
hypothetical nanocomposite samples. The mixing rule theory
and equation was used for composite tensile strength calculation to determine the enhancement in tensile strength due to
the incorporation of a particular percentage of nanophase
material into the bulk matrix of the steel.
Figure 5 also shows the percentage enhancement of nanocomposite tensile strength with respect to the tensile strength
of pure steel material. The data clearly shows that the blending
of different percentages of SWCNTs with steel can dramatically improve the tensile strength of the nanocomposite material and so can provide an avenue for manufacturing very high
strength equipment, tools and tubular for oil and gas field applications, especially important for extreme drilling environments that require stronger, more robust tools and equipment.
Further, the same application of nanomaterials in the preparation of a steel-matrix nanocomposite to develop very strong
but significantly lighter casing, drillpipes, CT, surface equipment
and other rig accessories will enhance the operational limits of
such tools and equipment in extreme drilling environments. As
a result, the challenges associated with using conventional tools
and equipment in horizontal and extended reach drilling, HPHT
drilling, deepwater drilling, casing while drilling, etc., will be
removed or reduced dramatically.
Fig. 6. Tensile strength enhancement potential of tools and equipment using

nanocomposite materials.
The theoretical values of the strength enhancement of the

nanocomposite due to the incorporation of specific concentrations of a SWCNT into the bulk steel matrix are shown in Fig.
6. The data clearly shows a dramatic increase in the tensile
strength of the SWCNT steel nanocomposite with increasing
concentrations of the nanophase material. But even small concentrations are effective; the incorporation of 5% SWCNTs
(w/w) into the steel matrix shows a tensile strength enhancement of more than 1,000%. As a result, the designs for tools
and equipment, including drillpipes and casing, MWD/LWD
sensors, mud motors, CT, etc., that use the SWCNT steel
nanocomposite or similar nanocomposite materials will improve the equipment stability dramatically in extreme drilling
and production environments. The data further indicates that
the use of a steel matrix nanocomposite with as little as 5%
SWCNT will provide tools and equipment more than 1,000%
stronger than conventional tools and tubular.
Again, the benefits of this extremely high tensile strength,
compared to conventional steel-based tools and pipes, are
many. The nanocomposite-based drillpipe will eliminate or significantly reduce drillstring parting, twist off, bending, etc.,
while drilling. In addition to the drillstring components, surface and other subsurface tools and equipment will also show
considerable improvement in mechanical stability, leading to a
dramatic reduction in oil and gas exploration and exploitation
risk in extreme drilling and production environments. The
more robust and stronger drillstring components will allow
higher weight transfer to the bit without any or with only negligible detrimental effect on subsurface tools and equipment.
The combined effect of very high mechanical properties with
the significant drop in the weight of nanocomposite-based
tools and equipment previously described will extend the technical limits of extended reach drilling operations, enabling
longer laterals. The higher resistance to bending will reduce
torque and drag problems, improve ROP and ensure fail-safe
operation by overcoming the detrimental effects of critical factors associated with extreme drilling environments. As a result,
the emerging nanotechnology and nanocomposite materials
will play a pivotal role in mitigating exploration and production
risk, well construction cost and nonproductive time, even as it
improves operational safety while drilling in challenging environments. The enhancement of the mechanical properties of
surface and subsurface tools and equipment by using
SPRING 2015
nanocomposite materials will cause a dramatic reduction in

the frequency of failure for main and auxiliary rig equipment.
TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT STIFFNESS ENHANCEMENT

Figure 7 shows a bar graph comparing the Youngs modulus of
the two nanomaterials and several conventional materials, including steel. The data indicates that SWCNT and MWCNT
have a Youngs modulus nearly four times higher than that of
steel. (As before, for reasons of consistency, SWCNT was used
in the theoretical nanocomposite preparation for studying material stiffness, even though the MWCNT has similar properties.) Different wt% of SWCNTs was used in the theoretical
blending of the dispersed phase nanomaterial with continuous
phase steel to prepare hypothetical nanocomposite samples.
The mixing rule theory and equation was used for the composite
Youngs modulus calculation to determine the enhancement in
tensile strength due to the incorporation of a particular percentage of nanophase material into the bulk matrix of the steel.
Figure 8 shows the percentage enhancement of the
nanocomposites Youngs modulus with respect to the Youngs
modulus of pure steel material. The data clearly shows that the
blending of different percentages of SWCNTs with the continuous phase steel can dramatically improve the stiffness of the
nanocomposite material and so can provide an avenue for
manufacturing highly stiff pipes, tools, CT and other tubular
for oil and gas field applications, especially important for extreme drilling environments that require very stiff material to
resist the detrimental effect of associated critical factors. The
Fig. 7. Youngs modulus of several conventional and nano-based materials.
Fig. 8. Stiffness enhancement potential of tools and equipment using

nanocomposite materials.
SPRING 2015
dramatic improvement of pipe and tool stiffness will enhance

the technical limit, and therefore, the mechanical stability of the
tools and equipment used in extreme drilling environments.
Therefore, the problems associated with less stiff conventional
tools and equipment in horizontal and extended reach drilling,
HPHT drilling, deepwater drilling, casing while drilling, etc.,
will be removed permanently or reduced dramatically.
Figure 8 also shows the theoretical values of the material
stiffness enhancement of the nanocomposite due to the incorporation of specific concentrations of a SWCNT into the bulk
steel matrix. The data clearly shows a dramatic increase in the
material stiffness of the SWCNT steel nanocomposite with increasing concentrations of the nanophase material. But even
small concentrations are effective; the incorporation of 5%
SWCNTs (w/w) into the steel matrix shows a stiffness enhancement of more than 50%. As a result, the designs of tools
and equipment, including drillpipes and casing, MWD/LWD
sensors, mud motors, CT, etc., that use the SWCNT steel
nanocomposite or similar nanocomposite materials will improve the equipment stability dramatically in extreme drilling
and production environments.
The benefits of the very high Youngs modulus, compared to
those of conventional steel-based tools and pipes, are similar
to those from greater tensile strength. The nanocompositebased drillpipe will eliminate or reduce drillstring parting,
twist off, bending, etc., while drilling. In addition to the drillstring components, surface and other subsurface tools and
equipment will also show dramatic improvement in mechanical stability, leading to a dramatic reduction in oil and gas
exploration and exploitation risk in extreme drilling and production environments. The greater stiffness of nanocompositebased drillpipes, tool joints, stabilizers and other components
will lead to significant improvement of the drillstring stability
and allow higher weight transfer to the bit without any detrimental effect on the drillstring. The combined effect of reduced
pipe/tubular weight, very high material stiffness and the extremely high tensile strength of nanocomposite-based tools and
equipment will extend the technical limit for safely operating
the equipment to a level that is unimaginable with conventional pipes, tools and equipment. This again demonstrates the
mighty effect of tiny nanos on the physical and mechanical
behavior of tools and tubular. As a result, the emerging nanotechnology and nanocomposite are expected to play a pivotal
role in mitigating exploration and production risk, well construction cost and nonproductive time, even as it improves
operational safety and equipment reliability in an extreme
drilling environment, where equipment is at perpetual war
with numerous critical factors. Due to the highly positive technical effect of the nanophase material, nanocomposites will
cause a dramatic reduction in the frequency of failure of surface and subsurface equipment in challenging drilling and
production environments.
POTENTIAL OIL AND GAS FIELD APPLICATIONS

The examples previously mentioned discuss only the enhancement of the physical and mechanical properties of bulk steel by
incorporating different percentages of nanomaterial into the
bulk material matrix. Published information on nanomaterial
applications in various types of nanocomposites highlights the
improvement of a variety of other material characteristics,
such as shock absorption and vibration dampening potential,
wear resistance, intelligent response, thermal stability, chemical
resistance and tribological characteristics, etc. A review of several of the nanocomposites or nanomaterials described by various authors follows to demonstrate their potential applications
in the oil and gas industry.
HIGHLY STABLE CT
Conventional CT has poor buckling resistance due to the insufficient stiffness of the steel alloy used to manufacture the
tubing. That is why current CT has limited performance in
horizontal and extended reach drilling operations. Figure 9 shows
the buckling failure of CT11. This buckling failure occurred
under the action of compressive forces due to insufficient material stiffness. It may be mentioned that the lower the stiffness
of a material, the poorer the materials resistance to buckling
failure under the compressive load. Improvement of CT composite material stiffness by incorporating one or more nanophase
materials will prevent the delamination tendency of CT under
the action of bending forces, and so reduce the chance of buckling failure significantly.
The greater stiffness of the nanocomposite-based CT will
allow a stronger push to the bottom-hole assembly while
drilling ahead and a stronger pull in case of a stuck pipe condition without damaging or parting the pipe/CT. Nanocomposite-based CT having two nanophase materials can improve the
tube stability dramatically due to simultaneous enhancement
of compressive and tensile stiffness. For example, simultaneous
incorporation of nano-sized boron fiber and tubular CNTs in a
metal matrix creates a nanocomposite material that can significantly improve the compressive and tensile stiffness of the tube.
As a result, the tube will offer very high resistance to tensile,
compressive and biaxial loading, leading to a dramatic improvement in the CT stability. The more than 50% increase in
Fig. 9. Buckling failure of conventional CT under compressive force11.
the stiffness of CNT steel composite described earlier highlights the potential application of nanomaterials in enhancing
the mechanical properties of CT. The greater stiffness of the
CNT steel nanocomposite will prevent easy delamination of
CT in horizontal and extended reach wells, which can significantly improve operational safety and efficiency.
HIGH WEAR RESISTANT TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT

DESIGN
The quick wear of a conventional drill bit, stabilizer, reamer,
drillpipe, etc., in the presence of abrasive formations and/or
extreme drilling conditions dramatically reduces the drilling
performance due to the need for frequent replacement of torn
out bits, stabilizers or reamers. The potential solution to this
problem is improvement in the wear resistance of these tools
and equipment, enough to overcome the abrasive and detrimental factors associated with extreme drilling environments.
It has been demonstrated12 that the incorporation of a
nanophase material into the continuous phase of a metal, or its
bulk matrix, can improve the material toughness significantly,
leading to a significant increase in wear resistance, Fig. 10.
According to the experimental data presented, incorporation of only 0.5% MWCNT into the bulk matrix can significantly improve hardness and wear resistance. It again highlights the application of emerging nanotechnology to create
superior tools and equipment design that can reduce wear
resistance in abrasive borehole environments. The application
of suitable nanocomposite materials in bit designs for extreme
drilling environments can significantly improve the bit performance and can play an important role in significantly reducing well construction costs. This also highlights the importance
of integrating the emerging nanotechnology in the development
of superior material for highly stable tools and equipment
design.
HIGH VIBRATION DAMPENING TOOLS AND

EQUIPMENT DESIGN
As vibration is one of the issues causing failure of the drillstring, an improvement in the vibration dampening characteristics of the elements of the drillstring can eliminate or reduce
Fig. 10. Improvement in hardness due to the incorporation of MWCNT in a

nanocomposite under three conditions12.
SPRING 2015
Fig. 11. Multilayer CNT polymer assembly13: (a) schematic of four-layer CNT
polymer structure, (b) optical image of CNT polymer structure, and (c) SEM
image of the CNT array.
the failure or damage associated with axial, torsional or lateral

vibration of the drillstring while making a borehole. Vibration
is also one of the major factors in the failure of downhole tools
and equipment in extreme drilling environments, since conventional oil and gas field tools and equipment have poor vibration dampening characteristics. Incorporation of shock
absorbing nanophase material in the design of tools and equipment can significantly improve their vibration dampening
characteristics. As a result, the emerging nanotechnology can
play an important role in the manufacturing of tools, equipment, seals, elastomers, etc., prone to failure due to vibration.
Misra et al. (2011)13 demonstrates the effect of shock absorbing CNT in the vibration dampening of a polymer CNT assembly, Fig. 11. According to the authors, the CNT polymer
assembly has a shock absorbing capacity at least three times
larger than that of natural and synthetic cellular foam materials of comparable densities. In addition to CNTs, inorganic
fullerene, fullerene boron, silicon carbides or other shock absorbing nanomaterials can be used in improving the vibration
dampening characteristics of tools and equipment.
RUBBER, SEALS AND ELASTOMER QUALITY

IMPROVEMENT
Downhole pressures and temperatures likely to be encountered
in current and future HPHT and deepwater environments can
vary significantly, depending on the location, subsurface geology, and tectonic and volcanic activities of the areas. Conventional seals, rubbers and elastomers rarely survive the detrimental effect of extreme conditions, such as high temperature,
pressure, acid gases, etc. Extreme HPHT environments place
tremendous stress on any elastomeric material, leading to permanent deformation, structural distortion, a decrease in ductility
and an increase in brittleness due to the poor thermal, physical
and mechanical stability of conventional seals and elastomers.
Therefore, improvement of the thermal, mechanical, and
chemical properties of rubbers, seals and elastomers is very important to improve the life cycle of these elements in extreme
drilling environments. Given the superior physical, mechanical,
thermal, and chemical properties of nano-based materials, incorporation of nanophase material in the bulk matrix of seals,
rubbers or elastomers can dramatically improve the technical
limit of these elements.
10
SPRING 2015
Fig. 12. Comparison of pure polyurethane (PUE) and nanocomposite

polyurethane properties.
Wu et al. (2013)14 describes the improvement in the flame

retardant performance and mechanical properties of a
polyurethane elastomer due to the surface modification of the
elastomer by incorporating TiO2 and SiO2 nanoparticles.
According to the authors, the surface modification of the
polyurethane using nanophase materials has significantly enhanced the thermal and flame retardant characteristics of the
elastomers. The authors further highlight the improvement of
the mechanical properties of the composite due to the dual effect of the uniform dispersion of the nanoparticles and the hydrogen bonding between the nanoparticles and polyurethane,
Fig. 12. The study demonstrates the potential application of
nanomaterials in improving the technical limits of conventional elastomers, seals and rubbers to produce superior performance in extreme drilling environments.
ACID GAS ENVIRONMENTS

Corrosion is one of the main factors that can have tremendous
effect on the durability of oil and gas field equipment. Very severe corrosion occurs in extreme drilling environments, such as
in HPHT and high acid gas containing boreholes. As a result,
conventional steel tools and equipment often show poor performance in those circumstances. A major improvement in the
working life and functional ability of surface and subsurface
tools and equipment dictates the elimination and/or mitigation
of corrosive action as one of the critical factors in extreme
drilling environments. Therefore, development of either very
efficient, long-lasting and highly durable corrosion inhibitors
or tools and equipment that are resistant to corrosive attack is
needed to provide a viable solution to this problem. Rather
than adding corrosion inhibition to special equipment design,
development of highly efficient corrosion inhibitors can serve
as an alternative solution. Development of nano-based corrosion inhibitors can provide a particularly efficient solution to
equipment failure.
Due to the microstructural size of conventional acid gas
scavengers, the specific surface area available for their interaction with, and neutralization of, harmful acid gases is very
small. Therefore, the interaction kinetics is very slow, and the
2. Amanullah, M. and Yu, L.: Environment Friendly Fluid

Loss Additives to Protect the Marine Environment from
the Detrimental Effect of Mud Additives, Journal of
Petroleum Science and Engineering, Vol. 48, Nos. 3-4,
September 2005, pp. 199-208.
3. Bell, M.R.G.: A Case for Nanomaterials in the Oil and
Gas Exploration and Production Business, paper
presented at the International Congress of Nanotechnology
(ICNT), San Francisco, California, November 7-10, 2004.
Fig. 13. Comparison of the H2S neutralizing potential of nano ZnO and bulk
ZnO15.
efficiency of their neutralization of acid gases is very low. That

is why conventional acid gas scavengers often show poor performance in neutralizing acid gases in high acid gas concentration areas. On the other hand, due to the huge specific surface
area available for the interactions of nano-based materials,
nano-based acid gas scavengers can quickly neutralize a huge
volume of acid gases while drilling, and so provide a safe and
hazard-free working environment with minimum risk of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) exposure. Sayyadnejad et al. (2008)15
demonstrates the dramatic effect of nano-size zinc oxide
(ZnO) in neutralizing a huge volume of H2S within a short period of time, Fig. 13. According to the experimental results described by the authors, the use of conventional ZnO in one
experiment showed only 2.5% removal of H2S in 90 minutes.
On the other hand, the use of nano-based ZnO in another experiment showed complete neutralization and removal of acid
gases in 15 minutes. The extremely high surface area-to-volume ratio of nanos, compared to those of micros and macros,
allows nanocomposites to incorporate a huge number of functional groups for effective neutralization of the acid gases that
enter the well while drilling. Therefore, the scavenging action
of nanocomposites can eliminate H2S gas totally and very
quickly after its entry into the wellbore, with a drastic improvement in the working environment, the occupational
health and safety of workers and the mechanical stability of
the drilling equipment.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors would like to thank the management of Saudi
Aramco for their support and permission to publish this article.
This article was presented at the Abu Dhabi International
Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, November 10-13, 2014.
REFERENCES
1. Shihab-Eldin, A.: New Energy Technologies: Trends in the
Development of Clean and Efficient Energy Technologies,
OPEC Energy Review, Vol. 26, No. 4, December 2002,
pp. 261-307.
4. Liesman, S.: Big Oil Starts to Tap the Vast Reserves That
Are Buried Far below the Waves, Wall Street Journal, July
3, 2000.
5. Amanullah, M. and Boyle, R.: Experimental Evaluation
of the Formation Strengthening Potential of a Novel Gel
System, IADC/SPE paper 100436, presented at the Asia
Pacific Drilling Technology Conference, Bangkok,
Thailand, November 13-15, 2006.
6. Amanullah, M. and Al-Tahini, A.M.: Nano-Technology
Its Significance in Smart Fluid Development for Oil and
Gas Field Application, SPE paper 126102, presented at
the SPE Saudi Arabia Section Technical Symposium and
Exhibition, al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia, May 9-11, 2009.
7. Amanullah, M.: Dendrimers and Dendritic Polymers
Application for Superior and Intelligent Fluid Development
for Oil and Gas Field Applications, SPE paper 164162,
presented at the SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and
Conference, Manama, Bahrain, March 10-13, 2013.
8. Proehl, T.: Drilling and Completion Gaps for HTHP
Wells in Deep Water, DeepStar CTR7501, Final Report,
Triton Engineering Services Company, 2006.
9. Ajayan, M., Schadler, L.S. and Braun, P.V.: Nanocomposite
Science and Technology, John Wiley & Sons, 2003, 238 p.
10. Kamigaito, O.: What Can Be Improved by Nanometer
Composites? Journal of the Japan Society of Powder
and Powder Metallurgy, Vol. 38, No. 3, 1991, pp. 315321.
11. McClatchie, D.W., Reynolds, H.A., Walsh, T.J. and
Lundberg, C.: Application Engineering for Composite
Coiled Tubing, SPE paper 54507, presented at the
SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Roundtable, Houston, Texas,
May 25-26, 1999.
12. Manjunath, L.H. and Dinesh, P.: Development and
Study on Microstructure, Hardness and Wear Properties
of As Cast, Heat Treated and Extruded CNT
Reinforced with 6061al Metal Matrix Composite,
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and
Technology, Vol. 3, No. 3, September - December 2012,
pp. 583-598.
13. Misra, A., Raney, J.R., De Nardo, L., Craig, A.E. and
Daraio, C.: Synthesis and Characterization of Carbon
Nanotube-Polymer Multilayer Structures, ACS Nano,
SPRING 2015
11
Vol. 5, No. 10, September 2011, pp. 7713-7721.

14. Wu, J., Yan, H., Wang, J., Wu, Y. and Zhou, C.: Flame
Retardant Polyurethane Elastomer Nanocomposite
Applied to Coal Mines as Air-Leak Sealant, Journal of
Applied Polymer Science, Vol. 129, No. 6, September 15,
2013, pp. 3390-3395.
15. Sayyadnejad, M.A., Ghaffarian, H.R. and Saeidi, M.:
Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide by Zinc Oxide
Nanoparticles in Drilling Fluid, International Journal of
Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 5, No. 4,
September 2008, pp. 565-569.
BIOGRAPHIES
Dr. Md. Amanullah is a Petroleum
Engineering Consultant working at
Saudi Aramcos Exploration and
Petroleum Engineering Center
Advanced Research Center (EXPEC
ARC). Prior to joining Saudi Aramco,
he worked as a Principal Research
Scientist at CSIRO in Australia.
Aman is the lead inventor of a vegetable oil-based dielectric
fluid (patented) that led to the formation of a spinoff
company in Australia for commercialization of the product.
He has published more than 70 technical papers and
files 17 patents, with seven already granted. Aman is one
of the recipients of the 2005 Green Chemistry Challenge
Award, awarded by the Royal Australian Chemical
Institute. He also received the CSIRO Performance Cash
Reward in 2006, the Saudi Aramco Mentorship Award in
2008 and the World Oil Certificate Award for nano-based
drilling fluid development in 2009. Aman is a member of
the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE). He received the
2014 SPE Regional Service Award for his contribution to
the industry.
Aman received his M.S. degree (First Class) in
Mechanical Engineering from Moscow Oil and Gas
Institute, Moscow, Russia, and his Ph.D. degree in
Petroleum Engineering from Imperial College, London,
U.K.
12
SPRING 2015
Dr. Jothibasu Ramasamy is a

Petroleum Scientist with the Drilling
Technology Team of Saudi Aramcos
Exploration and Petroleum
Engineering Center Advanced
Research Center (EXPEC ARC). He
joined Saudi Aramco in July 2013.
Prior to this, he worked as a Research Fellow with the
Department of Chemistry at National University of
Singapore and as a Postdoctoral Fellow with the Catalysis
Center at King Abdullah University of Science and
Technology (KAUST), Saudi Arabia.
Jothibasu received his B.S. degree in Chemistry from
Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, India, and his
M.S. degree, also in Chemistry, from Anna University,
Chennai, India. In 2010, he received his Ph.D. degree in
Chemistry from National University of Singapore,
Singapore.
Intelligent Distributed Acoustic Sensing

for In-well Monitoring
Authors: Dr. Jinjiang Xiao, Mahmoud Farhadiroushan, Andy Clarke, Rami A. Abdalmohsen, Essam M. Al-Alyan,
Dr. Tom R. Parker, Dr. Janti Shawash and H. Craig Milne
ABSTRACT
Inflow control valves (ICVs) and inflow control devices (ICDs)
can enable optimization of the production and injection profile
along the wellbore. The ICVs are operated to increase hydrocarbon recovery and prevent unwanted fluid production. The
ICVs are operated to optimize the production profile in multilateral zones. Although the operation of these devices is well
understood, the optimization of these devices in situ is complex. The real-time monitoring of fluid flow along the wellbore
can provide valuable information, which can then be used to
set the positions of the ICVs and optimize the fluid flow in
multilateral zones. In the water injector, the flow profile across
ICD zones can be monitored in real-time while adjusting the
surface choke.
The intelligent distributed acoustic sensor (iDAS) uniquely
allows the simultaneous recording of acoustic energy along
many kilometers of fiber optic cable deployed along the wellbore.
The system uses a novel digital optoelectronics detection technique that captures the amplitude and phase of the acoustic
waves generated and propagated along the wellbore over a
wide frequency range, from 1 mHz to 100 kHz, and with a
high dynamic range, >120 dB. A number of signal processing
techniques have been developed for processing a large array of
the acoustic data recorded along the wellbore for use in monitoring the inflow at different zones. The iDAS system can be
used with both single mode and multimode fiber optic cable.
The iDAS system was retrofitted to the existing fiber optic
cables already installed along several wells in Saudi Arabia to
record the acoustic energy (noise) generated across the ICVs and
ICDs and propagated along the wellbore tubing. The acoustic
spectrum can then be used to monitor the fluid flow through the
ICVs and ICDs. Further, using an array to process the data allows
the speed of sound (SoS) to be determined over several sections
of the tubing, which helps to identify the fluid composition.
This article reports on the results of the field trial in several
wells equipped with ICVs and ICDs.
THE INTELLIGENT DISTRIBUTED ACOUSTIC SENSOR

(iDAS) FIELD TRIAL SURVEY
The intelligent distributed acoustic sensor (iDAS) field trial
campaign was conducted in multiple wells. These wells varied

in their use, construction and the type of fiber optic cable installed. We report on the campaigns survey of the three wells
outlined here.
Well-1 was a horizontal, open hole water injector equipped
with inflow control devices (ICDs). This well was instrumented with multimode optical fiber.
Well-2 was a trilateral oil producer with inflow from each
lateral controlled by an inflow control valve (ICV). The ICVs,
along with the surface choke valve, are used to control the
flow rates within the well. The well was also instrumented
with a multimode fiber optic cable. The survey of this well was
the first ever adoption of iDAS field measurement using a multimode fiber for flow profiling1, 2.
Well-3 was also a trilateral oil producer with ICVs similar
to those of Well-2 except that Well-3 was instrumented with
only a single mode fiber optic cable, installed to monitor optical fiber gauges3. Also in contrast to Well-2, the laterals kick
off from the motherbore much further away from their respective ICVs. This means the inflow from each lateral must flow
through the annulus before entering the motherbore through
the ICV. The data acquisition program in Well-3 was run
alongside a seismic acquisition program.
The data was collected in three stages to ensure that each
phase of the transitions between all test points was recorded.
First, data was collected for a period of approximately 1 to 2
hours while the valve settings were changed. During this period,
the flow regime and rate is transient, so data collected during this
period is used mainly in diagnostics, ensuring the correct valves
are being adjusted and indicating how the noise level within the
well varies from setting to setting. Once the well had stabilized,
data was collected for a further period of approximately 1 hour.
This data can be used in the flow profiling analysis, using the
sound generated within the wellbore from either ICV noise or
the flow itself. Finally, data was collected with the well in the
same condition but during simultaneous seismic acquisition.
The energy put into the ground by the seismic vibration source
generates tube waves within the wellbore that acoustically illuminate the production volume. A proprietary technique has
been developed to process the data collected during seismic acquisition to produce enhanced measurements of the speed of
sound (SoS) and calculations of the fluid velocity.
SPRING 2015
13
well in either the optical domain or the acoustic domain. The

iDAS receiver channel corresponding to the wellhead was
found by creating a controlled acoustic signal at the wellhead.
Viewing the iDAS response enabled the exact receiver channel
where this position calibration signal was detected to be
found. In this particular well, the fiber gratings used for the
flow meters installed in the well create reflections and losses in
the optical signal. The detection of these features allowed each
iDAS receiver channel to be accurately matched to a certain
depth by checking the well completion details.
Root-Mean-Square (RMS) vs. Depth
Fig. 1. Operating principle of the iDAS.
INTELLIGENT DISTRIBUTED ACOUSTIC SENSOR (iDAS)

As shown in Fig. 1, iDAS can be used to listen to the acoustic
wave field at any position along a fiber optic cable4-6. In the
case of a fiber optic cable installed in a well, iDAS can listen to
the sound within the production volume along the entire wellbore. This sound can also be tracked as it travels within the
production volume, which means it can be used to detect the
speed at which the fluid is moving at every point within a well.
At the same time, iDAS can look out into the formation and
act as a seismic receiver. This means that a single fiber optic
cable installation in a well can be used to both monitor the
flow profile within the well and also image the surrounding
formation.
We have developed a number of fast signal processing techniques to analyze the acoustic spectrum along the fiber optic
cable. This enables us to characterize the acoustic energy
(noise) generated along the wellbore by ICVs and ICDs. In addition, by using the array processing to analyze the propagation
of the acoustic waves in space, time and frequency, we can
monitor the fluid composition and calculate the fluid velocity
by determining the SoS4, 5.
DATA ANALYSIS
This section of the article will describe in greater detail the data
processing techniques that were used in the analysis of this
data set. The data was processed using two main approaches
that treated the iDAS system: (1) as a set of many point sensors,
and (2) as a distributed array of sensors. Considering each individual iDAS system on its own allows a physical quantity,
such as the acoustic energy or the frequency spectrum, to be
mapped along the wellbore at high resolution. In contrast,
considering the iDAS system as a distributed array of sensors
allows for the use of sophisticated signal processing techniques
to detect things, such as the SoS for the propagating acoustic
signals within the production fluid.
The first stage of processing was to correctly reference the
iDAS receiver depth along the well. This can be done equally
14
SPRING 2015
An estimate of the amplitude of the acoustic signal over a defined period of time and at a specific position on the fiber optic
cable can be made by calculating the root-mean-square (RMS)
value of a single iDAS receiver channel. This analysis treats
each iDAS receiver channel as an individual receiver. The RMS
value is calculated using Eqn. 1:

(1)
(1)
where l is the length of time series in samples and x is the iDAS

time series data.
The RMS levels were calculated to identify those noisy regions
(2)
within the well that act as sound sources to acoustically illuminate the production fluid. The presence of a sound source
within the well can greatly increase the signal-to-noise ratio
(SNR) of the measurements by increasing the acoustic energy
traveling within the production fluid.
Frequency Spectrum (FFT) vs. Depth
In addition to knowing the total acoustic energy measured at

a specific depth in the well, it is also important to know the
frequency content of that energy, again treating each iDAS
receiver channel individually. The detection of propagating
acoustic energy and the attenuation with distance of this energy is highly dependent on the frequency of the signal. Also,
the frequency content of the noise at a specific location can be
used to characterize that noise. For example, high frequency
energy can be generated by high-pressure fluid passing through
a small hole, such as through a perforation or a leak path. A
frequency spectrum (FFT) analysis can highlight which noise
sources within the well are generating the majority of the
propagating acoustic energy.
The SoS is detected in the well only in regions where there is
a sufficiently large distance between ICDs, which affords a
greater length of continuous diameter tubing. The detected
SoS, where detection is possible, is close to that expected of the
SoS in water, ~4,900 ft/s. In the regions where upgoing and
downgoing SoS detection was possible, the calculated flow
speeds were much greater than expected and therefore do not
show on the flow speed graph.
theoretical SoS through oil in an infinite medium, and the effect of the particular completion details on this basic sound
speed. The speed of acoustic propagation
within the fluidic
(1)
production volume is dependent on flow speed. This phenomenon is known as the Doppler shift. Measuring the SoS in both
directions within the well allows the speed of the flow to be
calculated using Eqn. 2:

Fig. 2. SoS measurement showing upgoing and downgoing Doppler shift in the
direction of the flow and f-k plot (left) and peak fit (right).
SoS and Flow
This data analysis focused on using the powerful array processing techniques made possible by the ability of the iDAS not
only to measure both the amplitude and the phase of the
acoustic signal, but also to provide a large number of receiver
channels at a fine spatial resolution. By generating a frequency
wave number (f-k) plot, it is possible to identify the speeds at
which acoustic energy is traveling as it is guided within the
wellbore completion. The Doppler shift, an increase and decrease in SoS induced by the fluid moving between the upgoing
and downgoing SoS, can be used to estimate the fluid velocity
along the wellbore.
An example of an f-k plot and the result of the line fitting
algorithm that determines the SoS are shown in Figs. 2a and
2b, respectively. In Fig. 2a, it is possible to see that a V
shape has formed where the lines correspond to the detection
of sound traveling at a single speed. The result of a line fitting
algorithm applied to the plot in Fig. 2a is shown in Fig. 2b.
This plot shows a peak correlating to the speed of propagation
of the sound detected in Fig. 2a. The exact SoS is found from
the location of this peak.
This SoS determination is dependent on two factors: The

(2)
(2)
where v is the flow speed and cu and cd are the SoS up and
down the well, respectively.
The actual speed of the sound propagation in a well is affected
by both the fluid composition and the completion materials
and structure. The interaction between the sound propagation
and these factors is very complex and depends on a number of
variables, such as the compliance of the pipe and formation.
Changes in the cross section dimensions will lead to changes in
the SoS.
ACQUISITION SURVEY
The iDAS system was retrofitted to the existing fiber optic cables
already installed along several wells in Saudi Arabia. These
wells varied in their use, construction and the type of fiber
Condition
Surface Choke
Base
0
100
1
2
3
4
5
6
80
50
40
35
25
Table 1. Well-1 test matrix
Fig. 3a. Schematic diagrams and deviation of Well-1 together with the RMS amplitude of the acoustic energy at different frequency bands for 100%, 50% and 25%
injection rates, respectively.
SPRING 2015
15
optic cable installed. During the data acquisition program for

each well, the ICVs and/or surface choke settings were altered
to produce a range of different flow rates, as described next.
Well-1 Water Injector with ICDs
Well-1 was a water injector well featuring a single tubing construction in open hole with ICDs. This well was instrumented
with multimode fiber. In this case, the surface choke was adjusted to change the rate of water injection, Table 1.
Figure 3a shows a schematic of the lower completion of
Well-1, a water injector with ICDs, along with graphs showing
the RMS amplitude of the acoustic energy at different frequency bands, indicated along the well trajectory. The acoustic
amplitude can be used for dynamic profiling of the injection
profile. Figure 3b shows the calulated water injection profile
from the acoustic energy.
As previously mentioned, the SoS was calculated using f-k
array data processing, Fig. 4. The SoS is detected in the well
only in regions where there is a sufficiently large distance between ICDs, which affords a greater length of continuous diameter tubing. The major feature seen in the data is that SoS
detection was only possible where a spacing of at least 100 ft
was present between the ICDs. The detected SoS, where detection was possible, was close to that expected of the SoS in water,
~4,900 ft/s.
Fig. 5. Intelligent well completion diagram of Well-2 with the multimode fiber
optic cable originally installed for a distributed temperature sensor7.
Test Point
Base
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Settings
L2
L1
MB
SC
0
3
3
10
10
10
0
0
3
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
64
64
64
64
64
64
64
64
0
0
0
3
3
10
L1 = Lateral 1 and L2 = Lateral 2, MB = Motherbore and SC = Surface Choke

The changes in pipe diameter and the turbulence flow

across the ICDs resulted in rapid changes in the calculated SoS.
In this case, we did not attempt to measure the flow rate using
the Doppler shift, although improving the spatial resolution of
the system would make it feasible to measure the SoS between
each ICD interval and so directly measure the injection profile.
Well-2 Trilateral Oil Producer with ICVs and Multimode
Fiber Optic Cable
Fig. 3b. The water injection profile across the ICD zones. The majority of the
water injection is taken by the upper compartment.
Fig. 4. SoS and flow analysis for Well-1, test point 4.
16
SPRING 2015
Well-2 was a trilateral oil producer with inflow from each lateral controlled by an ICV, Fig. 5. The well was also instrumented with a multimode fiber optic cable. The survey of this
well was the first ever adoption of iDAS field measurement using a multimode fiber for flow profiling1.
The ICVs, along with the surface choke valve, are used to
control the flow rates within the well, as indicated in Table 2.
Figure 6 shows a schematic diagram of the well completion
and the spectrogram of the acoustic energy along the wellbore.
ICV locations show the highest acoustic energy, centered
around 500 Hz. In addition, the ICVs are quiet when set in a
fully open position of 10, Fig. 6e.
Using the f-k analysis, we can separate coherent acoustic energy propagating in both directions. The SoS can be determined
by measuring the slope of the ridges in the f-k plot. The SoS
Fig. 6. Spectrogram of the acoustic signal vs. depth for different ICV settings in Well-2: (a) well schematics, (b) base, (c) test point 1, (d) test point 2, and (e) test point 3.
Fig. 7. SoS and the fluid velocity along the wellbore for Well-2, test point 2.
along the wellbore is determined as indicated in Fig. 7 for test

point 2, where the ICVs generated a strong acoustic energy for
both upgoing and downgoing waves. The SoS is about 3,000
ft/s to 3,500 ft/s. A shift in the SoS can be seen around 6,000 ft.
The fluid velocity was then calculated using Eqn. 2. Average
values around 20 ft/s were obtained between the lateral 1
and lateral 2 ICVs, which corresponds to the typical production rates. The fluid velocity near the surface was measured
at close to zero. This can be explained by acoustic energy coupling to the annulus fluid in the vertical section of the well that
is not flowing.
SPRING 2015
17
Fig. 8. Intelligent well completion diagram of Well-3 with the single fiber optic
cable originally installed for fiber optic sensors6.
Test
Point
L2
ICV %
L1
ICV %
MB
ICV %
12
12
43
100
100
100
Surface
Choke %
12
35
65
20
100
10
100
100
20
43
MB = Motherbore, L1 = Lateral 1 and L2 = Lateral 2.

Fig. 9. Well-3, test point 9, acoustic amplitude (far right) vs. depth vs. time during
a single seismic shot, showing the up going and down going waves before and
after a single shot.
Well-3 Trilateral Oil Producer with ICVs and Single Mode

Fiber Optic Cable
As shown in Fig. 8, Well-3 was also a trilateral oil producer

with ICVs similar to Well-2 except that it was instrumented with
only a single mode fiber optic cable for monitoring optical fiber
gauges3. Also, in contrast to Well-2, the laterals kickoff from
the motherbore much further away from their respective ICV.
18
SPRING 2015
This means the inflow from each lateral must flow through the
annulus before entering the motherbore through the ICV.
The data acquisition program in Well-3 was run alongside a
seismic acquisition program. A summary of the test matrix for
Well-3 is provided in Table 3.
Figure 9 shows the acoustic amplitude time data as recorded
byeach iDAS receiver channel within the well for test point 9.
Inthis case, the two upper lateral ICVs were shut and the
motherbore ICV was partially open. The depth of the iDAS receiver channel is plotted on the y-axis, and time is along the xaxis. The plot shows that this particular seismic shot occurred
just 68 seconds into the iDAS recording file. The plot shows 1
second of data prior to the shot and 2 seconds of data after the
shot. Also of note is the presence of the diagonal lines between
4,000 ft and 7,000 ft. These lines register the presence of propagating acoustic signals. The direction of the lines shows that
this signal is propagating up the well. It can also be seen that
these lines are not present below 7,000 ft and that the overall
signal amplitude is lower, as indicated by the lack of high amplitude information in that region. The location where
propagation ceases coincides with the location of both the
ICVs and the optical fiber gauge.
Prior to the seismic shot, within the top 500 ft of the well,
some more diagonal lines are visible. This shows that some
acoustic energy is being created at the surface and propagating
a short distance down the well. The seismic shot then creates
more energy at the surface, which can be seen to propagate
much further down the well, indicated by the bright diagonal
lines that start after 68.5 seconds. The plot also shows two
features in this region traveling at different speeds. The steeper
lines that propagate in a zigzag nature are traveling faster and
can be seen to reflect back up the well at approximately 1,200
ft. These waves continue to bounce up and down this section
of the well for about 1 second. The lines signaling the slower
feature show energy propagating down the well only, reaching
approximately 2,500 ft to 3,000 ft in about 1 second. The vertical stripes are an artefact of the correlation processing and do
not represent a physical feature within the data.
Figures 10 and 11, respectively, show the analyses before
the seismic shot and 0.5 seconds after the single seismic shot
illumination, each taking a time window of 0.5 seconds. The
sections were chosen so that the windows did not overlap. Figure 11 also shows acoustic seismic energy propagating in the
wellbore.
The left-hand plot provides a schematic of the completion
diagram, showing the internal and outer diameters of the
production tubing as well as the depths of the ICVs and flow
meter. It can be seen that the tubing size changes at approximately 6,300 ft. The second plot from the left shows the well
deviation survey as a function of depth. The well is vertical until approximately 5,000 ft and then deviates to be horizontal
from 7,100 ft onwards.
The results from the FFT analysis and RMS analysis are
shown, respectively, in the third and fourth plots. The color
Fig. 10. Well-3, test point 9, FFT, RMS and f-k data analysis before the seismic
shot for a time window of 0.5 seconds.
Fig. 11. Well-3, test point 9, FFT, RMS and f-k data analysis 0.5 seconds after a
single seismic shot illumination for a time window of 0.5 seconds.
FFT plot has frequency along the x-axis and shows the signal
amplitude at each frequency for each sensor depth, blue being
the minimum and red being the maximum amplitudes. The
plot shows an increased broadband acoustic energy between a
depth of 4,000 ft to 7,000 ft, indicated by the increase in yellow color in this region as opposed to below 7,000 ft, for
example. This region also shows the presence of single frequency, tonal, and energy at approximately 40 Hz and again
at approximately 50 Hz. The RMS graph shows that the overall signal level is much lower below 7,000 ft than above, although this is difficult to show on the graph due to the large
amplitude ranges. Above 7,000 ft, the graph is very spiky due
to the effect of clamping the cable against the production tubing, which creates points that are coupled more firmly to the
production tubing than other points directly adjacent to them.
The plots show that, for this test point, there is an upgoing
acoustic signal from about 7,000 ft, which corresponds to the
location of the lateral 2 ICV. This signal propagates up the well
to approximately 2,000 ft at between 3,000 ft/s and 3,400 ft/s.
The SoS is the most stable between 6,500 ft and 4,000 ft, with
the highest SNR and the smallest variation between depth windows. The SoS can be seen to gradually decrease slightly in this
region before increasing more significantly between 4,000 ft and
3,000 ft, and then increasing again from 3,000 ft to 2,500 ft.
The SoS varies by up to 300 ft/s over the range of propagation.
There is also a weak downgoing acoustic signal that propagates from the surface to approximately a depth of 1,000 ft.
The final graph on the far right plots the calculated flow
speed using Eqn. 2. In this distance and time window, an
upgoing and downgoing acoustic signal was not detected at
the same depth, and meaningful flow results could not be calculated. In situations where the peak fitting algorithm cannot
find a peak in the data, it returns a value of 0 ft/s as the SoS.
If this occurs for both the upgoing and downgoing case, then
the flow speed calculated will be 0 ft/s. This can be seen in the
region below 7,000 ft where no propagating acoustic signal was
detected in either direction, giving a default flow speed of 0 ft/s.
The immediate feature that stands out in Fig. 11, showing
the results 0.5 seconds after the seismic source shot is fired, is
the increased energy between the surface and approximately
1,500 ft depth. The FFT and RMS graphs show the increased
energy level in this region, with the measured energy mostly
concentrated in the 80 Hz to 110 Hz region. This energy can
also be seen to propagate to approximately 2,000 ft depth, as
shown in the downgoing SoS plot. This is further than was
seen for the data window before the seismic shot was fired.
The SoS detected is stable at around 3,400 m/s over the 2,000
ft range.
The SoS detection region is similar for each Well-3 test
point, all showing good detection of the SoS between a depth
of approximately 3,000 ft and 7,000 ft. This depth range can
be split into three further regions based on the characteristics
of the data seen in the graph. As indicated in Fig. 12, between
7,000 ft and approximately 5,750 ft, the SoS for test points 5,
8 and 9 cluster together around 3,100 ft/s, whereas for test
points 1 and 6, the speeds collect at a higher value of around
3,200 ft/s. There is also a slight trend in this region for the SoS
to decrease as we move up the well. At approximately 5,750
ft, the group of test points with the lower SoS sees that speed
increase significantly to approximately 3,400 ft/s and stay at
this speed up to around 4,000 ft depth. Test points 1 and 6
continue on the same trend as between 7,000 ft and 6,000 ft,
with the SoS gradually decreasing to almost 3,000 ft/s at 4,000
ft depth. This creates a large difference between the two groups
Fig. 12. ICV and surface choke settings for Well-3 test points with up going
acoustic energy.
SPRING 2015
19
Settings
Valve
Test Points with

SoS ~3,100 ft/s
Test Points with SoS

~3,400 ft/s
Surface
Choke
43
35
100
65
100
L2 ICV
12
L1 ICV
12
12
MB ICV
20
L1 = Lateral 1, L2 = Lateral 2, MB = Motherbore and SoS = Speed of Sound

Table 4. ICV and surface choke settings for Well-3 test points with up going
acoustic energy
of test points in this region. At the 4,000 ft depth, test points 1

and 6 show a step increase in the detected SoS: Test point 1
jumps to about 3,200 ft/s while test point 6 jumps to 3,400
ft/s. The other test points, which were already at around 3,400
ft/s, show a dip in the SoS at approximately 3,500 ft depth,
dropping down to 3,200 ft/s before returning back up to 3,400
ft/s by 3,000 ft depth. That the SNR in the region above the
4,000 ft depth is lower than at deeper parts of the well is
shown by the detection of an erroneous SoS outside the range
of the plot.
The ICV and surface choke settings for each of these test
points are shown in Table 4. The test points are grouped by
their approximate SoS, between a depth of 4,000 ft and 5,750 ft.
The table shows that the test points that did not produce
the step increase in the SoS around 5,750 ft depth both had
lower surface choke settings, 43% and 35%, than the other
test points of 100%, 65% and 100%. The other ICV settings
do not show any other obvious trends.
Effect of Stacking Seismic Shots Illumination
Multiple seismic shots were recorded at a single location for

each test point in Well-3. In standard seismic data processing,
averaging the shots together (stacking) is used to improve the
SNR of the final result. The same technique can be applied to
the flow data used here.
Figure 13 shows a stack of 123 shots performed at a single
location near Well-3 during test point 9. The plot demonstrates how the stacking has increased the SNR significantly,
making the seismic shot energy much clearer. The plot shows
two features caused by energy from the seismic shot propagating to the fiber optic cable in different ways. The curved line,
seen most clearly at 0.1 seconds and at a depth of 3,000 ft, can
now be seen to propagate further down the well to an approximate depth of 6,500 ft. This energy is the first arrival from the
energy propagating through the formation this signal is important in seismic imaging analysis7, but since it propagates
within the formation, it does not contain any information
about the fluid within the well.
20
SPRING 2015
Fig. 13. Well-3, test point 9, stack of seismic shots along with the position of the
ICV.
Arriving after this formation energy is a series of straight

lines, seen between 0.3 and 0.4 seconds at a depth of approximately 3,000 ft. This energy is propagating as a tube wave
within the well completion structure and so contains information about the fluid within the well. This energy is the same as
that seen for the single seismic shots presented earlier, where
downgoing energy was detected. In this case, however, the
stacking has improved SNR enough that it is possible to see
that this energy propagated much deeper into the well, reaching
approximately 6,500 ft instead of around the 2,500 ft to 3,000
ft detected from a single shot.
The same data processing techniques to determine SoS were
applied to this data as were applied to the single seismic shot
records. The results of this processing are shown in Fig. 14.
The downgoing acoustic energy can be seen to propagate almost the full length of the well, with a peak in the SoS measurements shown as deep as nearly 8,000 ft. This is even further
than first seen in the depth-time plot, since the processing steps
extract the downgoing energy that was not visible to the naked
eye due to noise or the presence of energy propagating in other
directions. Since upgoing and downgoing SoS has been detected over most of the well depth, it is possible to calculate a
flow speed estimate. In this case, the values obtained for the
flow speed were not representative of the expected flow speed
within the well in all regions.
Fig. 14. Well-3, test point 9, KW data analysis with the seismic shots attached.
Many variables can affect this result, and these issues are
discussed along with the rest of the results next.
DISCUSSION
The selection of the data processing performed on the data set
from these trials, presented earlier, was made to highlight a
representative selection, one showing all the features and characteristics of the data.
This data shows that varying the ICV and surface choke settings has a significant effect on the acoustic energy propagation
within the well; those settings therefore had a very significant
effect on the results obtained for each test point. This data also
shows that certain ICVs can be noisier than others, and that
certain settings for a single ICV can be noisier than other settings. This is to be expected due to a combination of factors
affecting the fluid inflow velocity through the ICV.
The inflow through an ICV can be described as fluid flowing from an area of high-pressure to an area of lower pressure
through a small aperture. Noise is generated when this happens through two mechanisms. The highly turbulent flow that
is generated as the fluid passes through the small aperture,
which forces it to speed up, causes eddies to form, which generates acoustic energy. The second mechanism involves very
large pressure differences or very small apertures, which can
cause cavitation to occur where tiny bubbles are formed within
the fluid, which then collapse and release a large amount of
acoustic energy. In both these mechanisms, the noise generated
is a factor of the fluid properties, the pressure difference and
the aperture size. If the fluid properties are considered to be
relatively constant, then the pressure difference and aperture
size are the key variables that influence the acoustic energy created. A large pressure difference and a small aperture size will
generate the largest velocity for fluid passing through the ICV,
which will generate the most acoustic energy. A smaller pressure difference or a larger aperture will generate less acoustic
energy since the fluid will not flow as fast through the ICV. In
the specific case of this data, the overall pressure drop was
greatly influenced by the surface choke setting. A higher setting (more open) will tend to reduce the pressure within the
motherbore and create a larger pressure difference between
that and the lateral. A lower setting (more closed) on the ICV
means that there is a smaller aperture size for the fluid to flow
through. It would therefore be expected that wells with the
highest surface choke setting and the lowest ICV setting would
generate the most acoustic energy. All the upgoing acoustic
energy detected during this analysis was seen to propagate
from the position of the ICVs.
The accuracy and precision of the SoS calculation is increased
as the number of recording channels within the array is increased;
to achieve that precision can mean increasing the overall length
of the array or reducing the distance between each recording
channel. Another factor affecting this calculation is the underlying SNR in the acoustic data. The iDAS used in these trials was
capable of sampling the fiber every 0.512 m, approximately

1.7 ft, and the array length was optimized based on the data
from each well. For example, to obtain the required SoS calculation precision for the Well-3 data, an array of 256 channels
was used. This corresponds to an overall array length of approximately 430 ft. To build a picture of the SoS profile over the
whole well, this array was shifted along the fiber by half the
array length for each iteration. The spacing between each SoS
measurement was therefore approximately 215 ft. It is possible
in some circumstances to reduce the number of sensors within
the array, e.g., the Well-2 data processing used an array length
half of that used during the Well-3 analysis 128 channels
since the SNR of the acoustic data was higher for this well.
CONCLUSIONS
The iDAS system was used in this trial to monitor the acoustic
signal both within a well and in the surrounding formation
using a fiber optic cable installed on the outside of the production
tubing for the purposes of simultaneous flow monitoring and
seismic imaging. The iDAS has been shown to be capable of
measuring the SoS within a well when sufficient propagating
acoustic energy is present.
The results presented here, which utilized existing, already
installed fiber optic cable, have also helped us to better
understand the acoustic energy propagation in both multilateral and single tubing well completions with ICVs or ICDs.
Further improvements are required for quantitative distributed
flow measurements. These include improving the detection
sensitivity and the spatial sampling of the acoustic energy in
particular sections of interest, such as across ICVs and ICDs.
This would require optoelectronics detection sensitivity enhancements, improved data processing resolution, the acoustic
modeling of the well completion geometry, optimizing of the
fiber optic acoustic sensing cable and the deployment configurations that can lead to direct flow measurements.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This article was presented at the SPE-SAS Annual Technical
Symposium and Exhibition, al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia, April 2124, 2014.
REFERENCES
1. Xiao, J.J., Farhadiroushan, M., Clarke, A., Khalifa, Q.,
Mulhem, A., Foreno Reyes, H., et al.: Inflow Monitoring
in Intelligent Wells Using Distributed Acoustic, SPE paper
167447, presented at the SPE Middle East Intelligent
Energy Conference and Exhibition, Manama, Bahrain,
October 28-30, 2013.
SPRING 2015
21
2. Hembling, D., Berberian, G., Carter, N. and Naldrett, G.:

Enabling Efficient Permanent Production Monitoring of
Advanced Well Completions in Saudi Arabia Using Fiber
Optic Distributed Temperature Sensing, SPE paper
115255, presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference
and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, September 21-24, 2008.
3. Al-Arnaout, I.H., Al-Buali, M.H., Al-Mubarak, S.M.,
Al-Driweesh, S.M., Zareef, M.A. and Johansen, E.S.:
Optimizing Production in Maximum Reservoir Contact
(MRC) Wells with Intelligent Completions and Optical
Downhole Monitoring System, Saudi Aramco Journal of
Technology, Summer 2009, pp. 22-30.
4. Farhadiroushan, M., Parker, T.R. and Shatalin, S.:
Method and Apparatus for Optical Sensing, Patent
WO/2010/136810A2, 2009.
5. Parker, T., Shatalin, S.V., Farhadiroushan, M., Kamil, Y.I.,
Gilles, A., Finfer, D., et al.: Distributed Acoustic Sensing
A New Tool for Seismic Applications, SPE paper
presented at the 74th EAGE Conference and Exhibition
incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2012, Copenhagen,
Denmark, June 4-7, 2012.
6. Johannessen, K., Drakeley, B.K. and Farhadiroushan, M.:
Distributed Acoustic Sensing A New Way of Listening
to Your Well/Reservoir, SPE paper 149602, presented at
the SPE Intelligent Energy International, Utrecht, The
Netherlands, March 27-29, 2012.
7. Madsen, K.N., Dmmong, S., Parker, T., Finfer, D., Travis,
P.N., Bostick, T., et al.: Simultaneous Multiwell VSP
Using Distributed Acoustic Sensing, paper presented at
the 2nd EAGE Workshop on Borehole Geophysics, St
Julians, Malta, April 21-24, 2013.
22
SPRING 2015
BIOGRAPHIES
Dr. Jinjiang Xiao is a Petroleum
Engineering Specialist working with
the Production Technology Team of
Saudi Aramcos Exploration and
ARC). His interests are well
productivity improvement and water management.
Prior to joining Saudi Aramco in 2003, Jinjiang spent
10 years with Amoco and later BP-Amoco, working on
multiphase flow, flow assurance and deepwater production
engineering.
He received both his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in
Petroleum Engineering from the University of Tulsa, Tulsa,
OK.
Mahmoud Farhadiroushan co-founded
Silixa in April 2007, where he is the
Chief Executive Officer. Mahmoud has
many years of experience in designing
and developing optical fiber sensors.
He previously co-founded Sensornet in
1998.
Mahmoud is the joint winner of two DTI SMART
awards, the prestigious Manufacturing Metrology for
World-Class Manufacturing Award (Frontier Science and
Measurement) in 2000 and the British Telecom Innovation
Award in 2001.
In 1984, he received his B.S. degree (with honors) in
Electrical and Electronic Engineering from Queen Mary
University of London, London, U.K. In 1985, Mahmoud
received his M.S. degree (with honors) in Microwaves and
Modern Optics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering
from University College London, London, U.K.
Andy Clarke joined Silixa in 2010 and

is a Senior Development Engineer.
In 2008, he received his M.Eng.
degree in Acoustical Engineering from
the University of Southampton,
Southampton, U.K.
Andy is a member of the European
Association of Geoscientists and Engineers (EAGE).
Rami A. Al-Abdulmohsen joined Saudi
Aramco in 2001. Currently, he is
working as a Production Engineer
handling oil production in the
Southern Area of Ghawar reservoir.
Rami received his B.S. degree in
Computer Engineering and his M.S.
degree in Petroleum Engineering, both from King Fahd
University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran,
Saudi Arabia.
Essam M. Al-Alyan joined Saudi
Aramco in 2005 as a Reservoir
Engineer working in the Reservoir
Management Department. He has
worked in different assignments as a
Production Engineer and Reservoir
Engineer, handling fields of different
maturity and complexity. Essam worked as a Reservoir
Engineer for the Haradh Increment-III, the worlds largest
field development with advanced well completions and
intelligent field infrastructure. Currently, he is working
with Reservoir Management looking after Haradh
Increment-I, one of the most challenging areas in the super
giant Ghawar field.
Essam received his B.S. degree in Petroleum Engineering
from King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Dr. Janti Shawash has been working

on distributed acoustics and
temperature sensors and a multitude of
their applications at Silixa for the past
5 years. His research interests include
digital signal processing, image
processing, pattern recognition and the
design of heterogeneous real-time computing systems.
Janti received his M.S. degree in Telecoms and a Ph.D.
degree in Electronics Engineering focusing on real-time
machine learning, both from University College London,
London, U.K.
H. Craig Milne is the Vice President of
Oil and Gas at Silixa. Craig joined
Silixa in 2012 following a 15-year
career in the Wireline division of
Schlumberger Oilfield Services. While
at Schlumberger, he held operational
and management positions in Asia, the
Middle East and Europe.
Craig received his B.S. degree in Electrical and
Mechanical Engineering from the University of Strathclyde,
Glasgow, U.K.
Dr. Tom R. Parker co-founded Silixa

in 2007 and is Silixas Chief
Technology Officer (CTO). As CTO,
he takes the lead in the development of
Silixas iDAS and ULTIMA DTS range
of instruments and oversees Silixas
application-specific development
projects.
Toms awards include the Metrology for World-Class
Manufacturing Award and British Telecom Technological
Innovation Award.
He completed his first degree at University College
London, London, U.K., and was awarded a Ph.D. in
Physics from Imperial College London, London, U.K.
SPRING 2015
23
New Generation Inflow Control Device

to Maximize Well Productivity during
Every Phase of a Wells Life
Authors: Hemant K. Sharma and Abdulrahman K. Al-Mulhim
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
In a carbonate reservoir, oil production from long horizontal

wells is typically a challenge due to reservoir heterogeneities
and the presence of fractures. The result is an imbalanced production profile, leading to early water breakthrough. Once water coning occurs, oil production may be severely decreased
due to resistance to oil flow by the water contributing zone.
To eliminate this imbalance, passive inflow control devices
(PICDs) are placed in compartments across the entire lateral
length of the horizontal, which compensates for permeability
variation. The compartments are separated from each other
using open hole packers and constrictors. The PICDs are always opened to production. In cases where specific inflow
control devices (ICDs) start to contribute to undesired water
production, water shut-off of the length below this ICD has to
be performed, leaving much of the oil behind.
A new generation of active ICDs was installed in an open
hole horizontal producer, where they could be selectively
opened/closed by a setting tool to control water production.
For the well using this completion, oil production has increased
by more than 200% with a consequent decrease in water production by 50%. The traditional water shut-off techniques of
using cement plugs, inflatable packers, gel plugs or chemical
plugs, etc., are no longer needed with this kind of completion.
To operate the new generation of ICDs, a new generation
modular anchor and universal shifting tool (UST) is used. The
downhole application of this tool for selective shifting of the
ICDs in the horizontal wellbore was the first in the world. The
tool uses hydraulic pressure created by an electric motor to
generate force. It provides setting assurance via real-time monitoring with controlled setting force, distance and speed. Using
the signature from the log to confirm the position of the ICD
sleeve whether opened or closed eliminates the need to
have additional production logging runs to confirm sleeve
position.
This article details the design and advantages of the new
generation of active ICDs in horizontal wells and how the new
modular anchor and UST is being effectively used for selective
operation of the ICDs.
24
SPRING 2015
Over the past 30 years, advances in drilling technology have

made it possible to drill horizontal wells for maximum reservoir contact, providing optimal sweep with lower drawdown.
Horizontal drilling enables engineers to increase the production of the wells and give wells increased longevity. The increased wellbore length, however, leads to various production
related issues, depending on the heterogeneity of the reservoir.
Higher pressure drawdown around the heel section as a result
of the frictional pressure drop of the fluid in the wellbore can
cause nonuniform fluid influx along the length of the wellbore.
An extended length of contact with the reservoir also results in
encounters with a higher variation of the reservoir properties,
which means heterogeneity becomes a critical factor in the
reservoir and well performance. Both problems can lead to
early breakthrough of water or gas at the higher drawdown,
which causes reduction in the oil recovery and uneven sweep
of the drainage area. Recovering the unswept oil in the reservoir at a later stage of production requires substantial investment, which might not be economical in most cases.
To eliminate these problems, wells are completed with advanced well completion (AWC) to avoid water coning/cresting
through the matrix, which involves isolating the high permeability streaks/fractures using open hole packers and chemicals. The basic objective of AWC is to equalize the influx into
the wellbore. AWC consists of inflow control devices (ICDs)
separated by open hole packers/constrictors. Swell packers are
also used, as they were in the recent completion, to provide extra inflation in the case of wellbore enlargement during production or due to acid stimulation. In addition, water adaptive
ICDs and autonomous ICDs (AICDs) have recently been introduced to control water production in the wellbore automatically as the water cut increases.
ICD TYPES AND COMPLETION

ICDs are permanent hardware installed in both new and sidetracked horizontal/deviated wells upon completion of the well.
Their use is based on the initial reservoir condition and the
simulation prediction of reservoir performance. An ICD is part
of the completion base pipe (liner/casing) with a differently
SUMMER 2011
24
Fig. 1. PICD in a passive completion.
Fig. 2. ICD in an active completion.
designed flow path to create additional frictional pressure,

thereby restricting the flow through the path. The purpose is
to equalize the flow along the length of the wellbore regardless
of the location of a given section and reservoir permeability
variation. ICDs enable the entire length of the wellbore to contribute to the total production, which optimizes and maximizes hydrocarbon recovery1. ICDs in general are choking
devices, restricting flow for the section of the lateral with
higher permeability; this allows the less permeable lateral sections to contribute to production, which in turn balances the
contribution along the wellbore. NetTool software is used in
determining the number of port/channels required in each
compartment of the wellbore before installation of the ICDs.
The design applies specific differential pressure at certain flow
rates; as a rule of thumb, 25 psi differential pressure is assumed across each compartment2. The ultimate objective for
the installation of the AWC system is to increase well productivity, prolong well life, and ultimately improve reservoir
sweep and recovery.
The ICD is designed to take care of changes in fluid viscosity, density and velocity, which occur with time, without creating an inflow imbalance and a negative effect on production.
Therefore, the dynamic conditions of the reservoir make ICD
selection and design an important factor in determining the
subsequent productivity from a well.
Based on the completion design, there are two kinds of
AWC: passive completion and active completion.
used in designing the ICDs: restrictive or frictional. The restrictive mechanism relies on a contraction of the fluid flow path to
generate an instantaneous pressure across the device, whereas
the frictional device creates pressure by directing fluid flow
along the length of a channel or tube3.
The result is three primary types of ICDs: (1) Helical-Channel/Labyrinth type (frictional), (2) Orifice/Nozzle type (restrictive), and (3) Hybrid Design type (combination of frictional
channel and restrictive nozzle).
Passive Completion
Orifice/Nozzle Type ICDs
The passive completion consists of passive ICDs (PICDs) and

annular isolation packers, Fig. 1. These PICDs cannot be adjusted as changes occur in the reservoir condition. To change a
PICDs location/number of ports, the whole completion has to
be pulled out and reinstalled after making the desired changes.
These ICDs use fluid constriction to generate a desired pressure

drop. Fluid is forced through a preconfigured set of small diameter nozzles before entering the pipe to create a flow resistance,
Fig. 3b. The pressure drop across this ICD occurs instantaneously
as it is highly dependent on fluid density and velocity and not
Helical-Channel/Labyrinth Type ICDs
This type of ICD uses surface friction to generate pressure

drop. It uses a number of channels with preset diameters and
lengths, Fig. 3a. The produced fluid flows through a multilayer
screen into the annulus between the screen and the solid base
pipe, where it is then forced to flow through the channels before getting into the wellbore. The design forces the fluid to
change directions numerous times, which creates a pressure
drop along the longer channel path. This has proven advantageous because it generates lower flow velocities, which reduce
the chances of erosion and plugging. The disadvantage of using friction to generate pressure drop is that the ICD becomes
viscosity dependent, which can cause problems in maintaining
uniform influx in wells where larger differences exist between
the viscosities of the oil and those of the produced water.
These kinds of ICDs are generally used in sandstone reservoirs.
Active Completion
Figure 2 shows the active completion featuring an integral,

premium, inner sliding sleeve with a shifting profile incorporated into the ICD joint. It provides the option of setting the
ICD to a fully open or fully closed position by using a mechanical intervention tool as required.
Two basic pressure drop mechanisms currently are being
Fig. 3a. Helical-Channel/Labyrinth type ICD.
SPRING 2015
25
Fig. 3b. Orifice/Nozzle type ICD.
on viscosity. One of the advantages of this ICD is its simple design, however, because it is dependent on fluid velocity, it is
prone to erosion during production. These kinds of ICDs are
used in carbonate as well as sandstone formations.
Hybrid Design Type ICDs
This combination ICD uses multiple bulkheads that form

chambers and flow slots 180 apart, Fig. 3c. Fluid flows
through each successive chamber and each incurs a pressure
drop. The primary pressure drop mechanism is restrictive, but
flow paths are in a distributive configuration. The ICD here
also incorporates a simple adjustment feature capable of altering the ICD flow resistance immediately before running in a
well, which is useful should real-time data collected during
drilling indicate the need to change flow resistance settings.
The adjustability comes from having multiple discrete chambers on board, each with a different number of stages. Therefore, the user may select the desired setting with more
stages for higher resistance or fewer stages for lower resistance.
New Technology in Active ICDs
The latest additions to the active ICD completion are the water
adaptive ICD and the AICD.
Water Adaptive ICD: The water adaptive ICD works on
the principle of restricting the entry port/nozzle as water
production increases. The idea is to use relative
permeability modifiers (RPMs) inside a screen. RPMs
are typically hydrophilic polymers used in downhole
applications. The ability to create a variable choking
option is provided by different RPM polymers. As the
water cut increases, the entry port of the ICD reduces in
size until it is completely closed with water cut above
Fig. 4. ACID.
70%. The polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE) called Teflon is

found to be suitable for this application. Teflon is a
porous material that has the ability to create a variable
choking option, and it is nonsensitive to salinity, acid or
fine plugging.
AICD: The AICD utilizes dynamic fluid technology to
differentiate between the viscosities of the fluid flowing
through the device. To maximize oil production, the
AICD technology employs an engineered system of flow
paths and channels to control fluid flow, Fig. 4, restricting water production by means of identifying the
viscosity contrast between the oil and water. All fluid
enters the side ports and exits the hole in the center. Oil,
which has a higher viscosity, is able to turn the corner
and travel through the side passages, giving it a short,
direct path to the exit. Water cannot achieve this path
as easily. This results in a low-pressure differential and
high total flow rate. The AICD has three individual
dynamic fluid components a viscosity selector, a flow
switch and a flow restrictor which function together
to allow the restricted or unrestricted flow of fluids.
The viscosity selector utilizes a system of flow paths,
which, based on fluid viscosity, density and velocity,
identifies the fluid that is flowing through the AICD
and then divides the total flow into two fluid paths.
Based on the viscosity selectors output, the flow switch,
or fluid crossroad, directs the selected fluid down one
of the two separate paths according to its properties.
Finally, the fluid restrictor restricts the flow of
unwanted fluid (water/gas) from entering the wellbore,
yet provides very little restriction to the flow of the
desired fluid (oil).
The mechanical designs of the various types of ICDs vary,
but the operating principle remains the same using additional pressure drop to redistribute flow along the horizontal
wellbore.
TYPICAL DESIGN OF AN AWC
Fig. 3c. Hybrid Design type ICD.
26
SPRING 2015
Figure 5 shows the typical design of an AWC using active

ICDs. The design is based on the formation analysis log and
Fig. 5. Typical design of AWC.
image log, including the loss circulation zone that results from
drilling the well. NetTool software is generally used to determine the location of the ICDs and isolation packers. The wellbore is divided into compartments depending on the permeability of the reservoir, including the intervals showing high
permeability contrast/fractures. Generally, more ICDs are
placed in compartments recovering oil from less permeable
intervals. In contrast, the high permeability streak/fracture intervals are generally isolated using two open hole packers with
blank pipe. Sometimes the fracture zones are allowed to produce with ICDs having a lower number of ports.
Based on the simulation of this particular well, the decision
was made to use an equalizer completion in five compartments,
consisting of 12 active ICDs separated by the five MPas packers
SPRING 2015
27
and seven constrictors. The constrictors are mainly oil

swellable inflatable packers that will inflate as per the wellbore
condition. Since the well is drilled in two different reservoirs
with variations in bottom-hole pressure (BHP), the reservoir
with the lower pressure is allowed to produce more, achieved
with an increased number of ICD ports. This will make the
production in the wellbore uniform.
The active ICDs can be opened/closed as needed using the
shifting tool run by wireline or coiled tubing (CT). The closed
position of the ICD is shown in Fig. 6a, and the open position
in Fig. 6b.
Wells completed in two different zones with different BHP
in the reservoirs risk the possibility of cross flow between the
reservoirs. To mitigate the issue of cross flow, the ICDs are
provided with a check valve, Fig. 6c, which will allow flow in
one direction only, i.e., from the formation into the wellbore/
liner and not vice versa. The check valve allows closed system
pumping with the sleeve in the open position.
The active ICDs are run in the closed position. They are
(shifted up to the open position to be able to:

Circulate from the bottom of the completion during
installation without the use of a wash pipe.
Set the liner hanger and the mechanical open hole
packers.
Advantages of Active Completion
1. Future water shut-off can be performed by closing the water

producing ICD using the shifting tool run by wireline or CT.
2. Cross flow between zones and/or branches can be prevented
using the check valve in the ICDs.
3. Future matrix acid stimulation can be performed selectively
by closing the ICDs where the acid is not desired and stimulating the intervals having open ICDs.
Note: The installed check valve is acid dissolvable, so it can
be dissolved if required. Therefore, care is needed while per
forming any kind of acid job as this might disable the check
valve and lead to cross flow between the reservoirs.
4. Reservoir management is enhanced.
5. The mechanical sleeve in the active ICD is designed to provide reliability and longevity.
6. Completion time is reduced (no inner string required for
open hole packet setting).
7. Hole displacement is possible prior to setting the lower
packer.
8. Drillers can get underbalance wells safely in place prior to
landing the hanger.
Fig. 6a. Closed position of the ICD (left).

Fig. 6b. Open position of the ICD (right).
Fig. 6c. Active ICDs with check valve in opened and closed positions.
28
SPRING 2015
The disadvantage of using this completion is that in case of

well control issues, the completion proves to be a major hurdle
in regaining control, as it is a closed system. The ICDs can also
be deformed if the differential pressure at the check valve is
above 1,000 psi.
To mitigate this issue of well control in the completion for
the horizontal producer, the check valves of three ICDs in the
higher permeability zone were dissolved with 10% hydrochloric (HCl) acid using CT. The injectivity after dissolving the
check valves was more than 2 barrels per minute at 1,000 psi.
An enhanced ICD design, which provides the required functionality to eliminate the inner string for open hole packer setting, has been developed. This incorporates a series of hydromechanical delayed opening valves and designated multitasking valves into the ICD, which effectively allows the ICDs to
act as solid, pressure containing, inner components, Fig. 7.
This provides the flow-through capabilities required for circulating through the liner and the pressure integrity for setting
the packers. Once the packers are set, all the ICD valves in the
well are tripped open by simply applying pressure above a predetermined triggering pressure. The valves open when this applied pressure is bled off, resulting in fully functional ICDs.
Additionally, the option exists to postpone opening these
Fig. 7. ICD with multitasking valve.
valves until after the upper completion is installed, thereby isolating the open hole until after the well has been fully completed and surface equipment has been installed. This results
in a higher level of well control, similar to using a formation
isolation valve in the liner4.
MODULAR ANCHOR AND UNIVERSAL SHIFTING TOOL

(UST) FOR ACTIVE ICD SLEEVE OPERATION
The wireline conveyed modular anchor and UST brings precision to well intervention operations, eliminating the reliance
on estimates and assumptions. The bidirectional, high speed
telemetry system provides precise control from the surface, resulting in a dynamically controlled modular tool that proves
flexibility during intervention operations. The sensors incorporated into the tool enable the operator to monitor the tool and
the progress of the downhole operation while responsively
controlling the tool for optimal performance.
To open or close a well component, such as the sliding
sleeve, the UST radially extends profile keys to engage the
completion equipment. The keys are extended with specified
preload force, but remain compliant to navigate varying well
geometry. The keys can fully retract into the UST to enable the
tool to pass any restrictions.
The modular anchor and UST, Fig. 8, used in combination
with a wireline conveyed UST, Fig. 9, provides setting assurance via real-time monitoring with controlled setting force,
distance and speed. The tool provides data for assessing anchoring force, anchoring diameter, axial force and displacement, plug setting force, wellbore pressure and temperature,
and the casing collar locator. The system uses hydraulic pressure created by an electric motor to generate force.
The tool uses linear actuator modules to apply controlled
axial force to the shifting tool. First, the anchor module opens
to anchor the tool in the well, then the linear actuator extends
or retracts multiple times to apply the force required for the
shifting tool to perform the opening/closing action. The linear
actuator can be extended up to 20, and it delivers continuous
measurement of displacement along the force applied to validate the operation. The speed, force and displacement of the
anchor and linear actuator are controlled automatically downhole according to the parameters set by the operator at the
surface.
The signature of the movement of the linear actuator can be
closely monitored. Before the operation of the job, the actual
signature of the modular anchor and UST is obtained in the
workshop while opening/closing the ICD while in the position
of the latching profile. This signature is for reference, and the
same will be verified later while the linear actuator is opening/
closing the ICDs. Figure 10 shows the signature of the tool
while opening the active ICD.
Benefits of using the modular anchor and UST are:
Real-time monitoring of the sleeve of an ICD can be
maintained from the surface using the tool.
With the signature from the log, the position of the ICD
sleeve can be confirmed (whether opened/closed).
Fig. 8. Modular anchor and UST.
Additional production logging runs are not needed to

confirm the position of the sleeve.
The tool can be used in conjunction with a tractor for
horizontal wells.
The downhole application of the modular anchor and UST
in this horizontal producer for use in selective shifting of the
ICDs was the first in the world.
OPERATION SUMMARY AND JOB EXECUTION
Fig. 9. Wireline conveyed UST.
After ICD completion of the horizontal well, the modular anchor and UST used in conjunction with the tractor were able
SPRING 2015
29
Fig. 10. Signature while opening the ICDs, used for reference.
to selectively engage each of the ICDs and obtain the signature

profile while performing each job, Fig. 11. The anchor and the
linear actuator secured the system, then pulled to shift open
the ICDs. The force vs. the displacement signature was captured
for each shifting operation and was compared with the reference signature, as previously seen in Fig. 10, to confirm that
the ICDs were fully opened. From Fig. 11, it is clear that ICDs
1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10 clearly replicated the signature obtained while testing the tool in the workshop. The signature
for ICDs 11 and 12 is not exactly as per the reference signature; however, the signature trend clearly indicated that the
ICDs were opened using the tool.
PRODUCTION EVALUATION
The production results before and after completing the well
clearly show that the active ICDs substantially helped to decrease water production, from 30% to 16%, with an increase
30
SPRING 2015
in oil production from 1,200 barrels per day (bpd) to 3,700

bpd, an increase of 208%. The production results are tabulated in Table 1.
The production evaluation made using the NETool simulation model to compare the inflow production profile of the
ICDs against the open hole completion is shown in Fig. 12.
It can be seen from Fig. 12 that there is a contribution from
all of the opened ICDs; however, due to one sections higher
permeability and reservoir pressure, the ICDs completed in this
section have a higher contribution. Later, the sections of the
completion with lower permeability and lower reservoir pressure were also able to contribute to the production (which was
not the case when the well was completed as open hole). The
plot in red shows the contribution from the reservoir while the
completion was open hole, and the plot in blue shows contribution when the well was completed with active ICDs.
Comparing the well performance with the formation analysis log clearly shows that the zones that previously were
Fig. 11. Actual signature of the tool while opening the ICDs.
Type
Liquid Rate (MBD)
Oil Rate (MBOD)
W/C%
Rate test with open hole completion
1.7
1.2
29.7
Rate test with active ICDs completion
4.4
3.7
16.0
% Increase in Oil
Production
208%
Table 1. The tabulated production results
contributing to production due to a high permeability streak,

leading to water coning, have been restricted. In fact, with the
installation of the ICDs, all the zones have started to contribute to the production in the wellbore. Since the number of
ports in each active ICD is dependent on the permeability variation and required contribution to the wellbore, the contribution from each ICD is now showing the desired variation.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Below are the conclusions and recommendations following
installation of the new generation active ICDs and use of the
modular anchor and UST to open the closed ICDs.
Installation of the new generation ICDs helps to control
oil and water production.
Because installation of the new generation of active
ICDs provides the flexibility to close and open the ICDs
SPRING 2015
31
Fig. 12. Production comparison with open hole and active ICD.
as required, there is no need to perform an additional

water shut-off job in wells completed with the active
ICDs, as the ICDs producing water can be closed using
the UST.
Using the modular anchor and UST provides a clear
signature of the sleeve position, which confirms the
open/closed status of the ICDs, realizing cost savings
since there is no need to run an additional production
log for confirmation of the sleeve position.
Using new generation ICDs minimizes well intervention
as the production logging along with subsequent action
to open/close the ICDs can be performed in one run.
Flow from more than one zone is possible using wells
completed with AWC even with different BHPs, while
the cross flow between reservoirs/zones is avoided with
check valves.
Wells completed with AWC are able to minimize the
water coning effect, leading to increased well life. The
economics of completing the well with AWC are
favorable, as the well life is increased substantially.
The need for well maintenance is minimized, including
workover for isolating and sidetracking in another
direction when the water production increases. The
sweep efficiency is also enhanced by use of this
technology.
Possibilities exist for expanding the utilization of new
generation active ICDs for future drilling/workover
completions in horizontal wells susceptible to water
production.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Aramco for their support and permission to publish this article
and to the management of Schlumberger and Baker Hughes
32
SPRING 2015
for providing support while preparing this article.

This article was presented at the SPE Annual Technical
Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,
October 27-29, 2014.
REFERENCES
1. Peterson, E.R., Coronado, M.P., Garcia, L.A. and Garcia,
G.A.: Well Completion Application for the Latest
Generation Low-Viscosity Sensitive Passive Inflow Control
Device, SPE paper 128481, presented at the IADC/SPE
Drilling Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans,
Louisiana, February 2-4, 2010.
2. Al-Mulhem, N.I., Sharma, H.K., Al-Zain, A.K., AlSuwailem, S.S. and Al-Driweesh, S.M.: A Smart Approach
in Acid Stimulation Resulted in Successful Reviving of
Horizontal Producers Equipped with ICD Completions,
Saudi Arabia: Case History, SPE paper 127318, presented
at the SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on
Formation Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana,
February 10-12, 2010.
3. Garcia, L.A., Coronado, M.P., Russell, R.D., Garcia, G.A.
and Peterson, E.R.: The First Passive Inflow Control
Device That Maximizes Productivity during Every Phase of
a Wells Life, IPTC paper 13863, presented at the
International Petroleum Technology Conference, Doha,
Qatar, December 7-9, 2009.
4. Coronado, M.P., Woudwijk, R., Infra, M., Al-Mumen,
A.A. and Al-Baggal, Z.A.: Latest Generation Inflow
Control Technology Provides Added Functionality during
Completion with Improved Well Control Features, IPTC
paper 13862, presented at the International Petroleum
Technology Conference, Doha, Qatar, December 7-9, 2009.
BIOGRAPHIES
Hemant K. Sharma is Senior
Production Engineer with more than
23 years of experience in the upstream
oil and gas industry, which includes
onshore and offshore technical
support. His experience and knowledge
includes production enhancement and
sustainability, formation damage diagnosis and
remediation, well stimulation, water shut-off, well
surveillance and monitoring, well completion and wireline,
long-term planning/forecasting and
construction/commissioning of large oil and gas complexes.
Currently, Hemant is working as a Senior Production
Engineer in the Southern Area Production Engineering
Department.
He is a member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers
(SPE) and has published many technical papers related to
production engineering.
In 1990, Hemant received his M.Eng. degree from
Bhagalpur College of Engineering, Bihar, India, and in
2005, he received an MBA from Indira Gandhi National
Open University, Delhi, India.
Abdulrahman K. Al-Mulhim is a
Senior Petroleum Engineering
Consultant working in Saudi Aramcos
Southern Area Production Engineering
Department. He has 30 years of
experience within Saudi Aramco and
has worked in various upstream
organizations production engineering, reservoir
engineering, production facilities, drilling engineering and
well completion. During the development of the giant
Khurais field, Abdulrahman was assigned the responsibilities as Superintendent of the Khurais and Central
Arabia Well Services division from March 2007 through
September 2010.
He is an active member in the Society of Petroleum
Engineers (SPE) and has authored, coauthored and
presented various SPE technical papers.
Abdulrahman received his B.S. degree in Petroleum
Engineering from King Fahd University of Petroleum and
Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
SPRING 2015
33
Technology Test Site: Value Proposition

for a Live Field Laboratory
Authors: Modiu L. Sanni, John T. Allen, Scott S. Jennings, Dr. Michael A. Jervis, Christopher B. Ayadiuno,
Razally M. Ali and Husain N. Al-Najrani
ABSTRACT
To accelerate the development, early uptake and deployment
of new technologies being developed in-house by Saudi
Aramcos EXPEC Advanced Research Center (EXPEC ARC)
and technologies being developed in collaboration with industry service providers and academia, Saudi Aramco started constructing a Technology Test Site (TTS) in a producing oil field.
The TTS, when completed, will be a live field lab where
many emerging technologies and innovative ideas can be tested
and tried under normal reservoir conditions.
To date, six wells have been drilled and completed. Extensive and comprehensive geoscience and engineering data were
acquired for detailed reservoir characterization and description, including over 11,000 ft of core data. Preliminary results
from the ongoing elaborate data analyses, including dual energy X-ray computed tomography (CT) scans, geomechanical
data and log data, have yielded some intriguing insights into
the often ignored nonhydrocarbon-bearing Upper Cretaceous
and Tertiary formations. The ongoing data analyses show why
certain intervals are unable to withstand mud weight of 8.33
pounds per gallon (ppg), equivalent to fresh water, while
drilling. Attempts are being made to extract requisite information that may help to resolve some of the challenges, e.g., the
lost circulation while drilling and near surface seismic anomalies that are frequently encountered across the Tertiary and
Cretaceous shallow formations.
This article highlights the value proposition for the live field
lab technology test site, lessons learned during the first phase
of the TTS development, some results of ongoing analyses and
some of the best practices that were developed.
unique and leading technologies designed to meet the challenges of current and future world energy demands.
The Technology Test Site (TTS) was conceived as a worldclass field laboratory within a producing oil field where new
ideas, concepts, subsurface/surface tools and technologies from
EXPEC ARC can be tested, proved, calibrated and qualified to
expedite the development and deployment of pertinent technologies to address some of the companys business needs, including:
Improved seismic acquisition and processing practices.
Enhanced reservoir management practices.
Improved drilling and completion practices.
Reduced costs and increased recovery factors.
The site not only will act as a catalyst to accelerate the development and deployment of new technologies from EXPEC
ARC, but will also provide a companywide location/platform
for the integration of multidisciplinary research projects focusing on oil and gas discovery and recovery related challenges.
In addition, the TTS will also undertake Saudi Aramco approved projects that may be proposed by partner companies,
service companies, agencies, research institutes and universities.
SITE SELECTION
The TTS is situated in a designated 5 km x 10 km area in the
INTRODUCTION
Saudi Aramcos EXPEC Advanced Research Center (EXPEC
ARC) is responsible for upstream oil and gas technology development. The center carries out cutting-edge upstream research
and development of innovative, high impact solutions and
technologies that will help expand Saudi Aramcos reserves
base and improve hydrocarbon recovery. From a humble beginning as a technology department, the center has become an
incubator of groundbreaking technologies and a cradle for
34
SPRING 2015
Fig. 1a. Location of the TTS on the Ghawar structure (left).

Fig. 1b. TTS well location (right).
SUMMER 2011
34
mid-northern part of the worlds biggest onshore field, Fig. 1.

The site was carefully chosen to include a variety of geologic
and reservoir conditions that are representative of challenges
in terms of future reservoir development and data acquisition
quality. Other factors considered in the location decision were
to find an area of active oil and gas production with little or
no changes to its reservoir conditions in the forseeable future,
with low density of major surface facilities (existing and
planned), and with no major topographic challenges (scarps,
wadi drainages, etc.).
Furthermore, the areas preexisting seismic data, which
straddles both good and poor seismic data areas, Fig. 2, would
help to address some of the challenges relating to the effect
of near surface anomalies on seismic interpretation, an issue
that is prevalent across the onshore fields in the Arabian
Peninsula.
GEOLOGY OF TTS/CANDIDATE FORMATIONS

The TTS was planned to be a well-characterized site targeting
the Upper Jurassic (Arab-D reservoir) to the Tertiary sedimentary section, Fig. 3a, of the Arabian Peninsula. According to
Powers et al. (1966)1 this section is naturally dominated by
gross characteristic carbonate and siliciclastic lithologies
separated by significant breaks in the geologic record. The
formations range from mostly carbonate but with alternating
evaporite-normal marine cyclic deposits near the end of the
Jurassic through the dominantly coarse clastic rocks with thin
basal carbonate units of the Cretaceous, which include some
evaporites, but mostly sandy limestone and sandstone of the
Pliocene.
The Upper Jurassic and early Lower Cretaceous rocks,
almost entirely shallow water limestone facies, are composed
of predominantly calcarenitic limestone lime sand admixed
with a lime mud matrix although thick, often laterally persistent beds of calcarenite clean washed lime sand and
gravel are common at many levels. Lime sands are of
various origins, but skeletal debris and aggregate pellets are

most common.
With the exception of a thin, albeit persistent, basal limestone, the late Lower Cretaceous rocks in central Arabia are
mainly continental sandstone. Fine-grained sandstone is interbedded with carbonate in the upper part, and the unit
shows gradational contact with the overlying continental series. Shale is commonly interbedded, and thin dolomite and
limestone layers are locally present. Upper Cretaceous to
Eocene rocks are for the most part limestone and dolomite
with a few very thin interbeds of marl and shale, which are
separated from beds above and below by a hiatus.
Tertiary rocks are mostly of shallow water to nonmarine
origin. These deposits are a heterogeneous assemblage of
sandy limestone, calcareous sandstone, sandy clay and a sandstone blanket in the Eastern Province. Unconsolidated sand
and gravel, presumably for the most part of Quaternary and
Recent periods, are erratically superimposed on the Miocene
and Pliocene sequence.
Given the heterogeneity of the lithofacies and the unconsolidated nature of the younger rocks, especially in the Cretaceous
and Tertiary sequences, one can begin to appreciate the difficulty of drilling through this section and the attendant massive
lost circulation often encountered in these zones, as shown by
the caliper log plots, Fig. 3b.
NEAR SURFACE SEISMIC ANOMALY CHALLENGES

This area presents many challenges for acquiring and processing seismic data. The near surface layers in particular present
difficulties for seismic imaging due to varying weathering
depths, near surface low-velocity zones, velocity inversions,
karsting, topographic variations, buried wadis (dry riverbeds)
and surface sand2. A series of tests was planned to help characterize the near surface as well as act as a test bed for new seismic
technologies, such as single sensor high channel acquisition. As
previously seen in Fig. 2, the TTS was designed to cover areas
Fig. 2. Quality of seismic data across the TTS area.
SPRING 2015
35
Fig. 3a. Stratigraphic column of the TTS area (left).

Fig. 3b. Sections of interest and typical caliper readings (right).
of both good and bad seismic data quality. These variations

provide an opportunity to better understand the factors affecting
36
SPRING 2015
seismic signal-to-noise ratio in this desert environment.

The initial seismic tests included the following:
Designing and recording an uncorrelated, bunched

geophone ambient noise spread (microspread) for the
test site the objective being to characterize the noise
levels. We performed a set of sweep tests in a circle
around the microspread at a constant azimuthal
increment to give an idea of anisotropy over a fixed
spatial subsurface region.
Designing a very high resolution, uncorrelated, multiple
2D line test where we could group data from different
crossline and inline receiver/source arrays. Each channel
needed to be a very small array or bunched geophones
to aid in development of acquisition/processing
strategies and algorithms for point source/receiver
acquisition. This high resolution line can also be used to
determine where future smart upholes those with
multiple logging suites along with conventional velocity
profiling might be drilled for calibration purposes.
One of the goals of the high resolution line is to produce a
very detailed near surface model. Indeed, the actual weathering layer for the test site is not well-defined. The uphole log
data will be used to help evaluate the seismic resolution limitations as well as define the lower base of the weathering or near
surface zone. Factors, such as the effects of near surface velocity inversions and saturated layers (open or confined aquifers)
on depth estimation in refraction statics, also need to be understood. Finally, these two tests will be used to investigate how the
ambient noise limits seismic processing resolution in this area.
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

The development plan for the TTS comprises subsurface and
surface facilities that serve as key enablers for the site to fulfill
its objectives as a catalyst to accelerate the development and
deployment of new technologies. The TTS has two parts,
namely the southeast and northwest. The southeast portion
will serve as the main operational base of the TTS, with a few
shallow wells having their total depth (TD) in the nonhydrocarbon-bearing Upper Cretaceous formation and a few
Upper Jurassic wells that penetrate the hydrocarbon-bearing
Arab-D reservoir. Here, a few state-of-the-art surface facilities
will be built. The northwest part with poor seismic data
will have a few shallow wells with TD (about 2,500 ft) in the
Upper Cretaceous formation.
To date, six wells have been drilled, three on either side of
the TTS. It is worth noting that a few more shallow wells may
be drilled in the northwest part of the TTS. Furthermore, in
the southeast part, other Jurassic deviated and horizontal wells
up to and below the Arab-D reservoir will be drilled for
drilling and completion tools related tests that cant be conducted in Well UTTS-1.
WELL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

Each of the six wells drilled to date has its unique design and
data acquisition objectives. A description of each well and the

primary function of each well are provided next. The wells
were not drilled in a sequential order. Well UTTS-1, being the
deepest well, was drilled first by a heavier rig, and then Wells
UTTS-4, UTTS-3 and UTTS-6 were drilled by a lighter rig.
Wells UTTS-5 and UTTS-2 were drilled last because of their
fiberglass casings.
SOUTHEAST WELLS
Data Well-1 (UTTS-1)
The first well drilled at the site, UTTS-1, is currently the only
well penetrating the hydrocarbon-bearing Jurassic reservoir.
UTTS-1 was drilled to a depth of about 7,000 ft, Fig. 4a. The
well was drilled primarily to test tools intended for 5 to
6 open hole sections across the Arab-D reservoir. We
needed to be able to do this with a completion string in place
for better pressure control and safety. The well was extensively
logged and cored virtually from surface to TD to establish a
ground truth for incontestable comparisons between new
logging tools and previously proven technologies tested under
a similar environment. This meant that killing the well to run
the open hole tools, as would normally be done, would affect
the sand face and compromise the validity of our baseline
data. The well therefore had to be designed to run open hole
tools on hepta-cable into a live well. This led to a choice between two designs.
The easier and less expensive option was a monobore completion using the final cemented 7 drilling liner in the last
hole section above the reservoir as the completion, with 7
completion tubing tied back to the surface above it. This design would have resulted in the ability to downsize all overburden hole sections.
The other alternative was a conventional design used in
most Saudi Aramco Jurassic oil wells. Usually in this design, if
the reservoir section is going to be 6, the drilling liner in the
previous section will be 7 and the completion tubing will be a
smaller size, i.e., 4 or 4. Since this would restrict entry
into the reservoir section of larger tools, UTTS-1 would need a
7 completion inside of a 9 drilling liner, necessitating increasing the size of all previous hole sections. This is no trivial
matter for Saudi Aramco as our surface hole sections are already very large; due to the unresolved hole integrity problems
we face on the onshore part of the Arabian Peninsula, we usually have four casing/hole sections plus a surface conductor
above the reservoir in our Jurassic oil wells.
One of the aquifers immediately above the reservoir is overpressured in this particular part of the field. This has led to
compromised cement jobs and premature failure of the drilling
liner in a number of wells in this area. We developed a plan to
prevent this in the test well; however, we knew that if we suffered such a failure in any case, we would have to perform a
cement squeeze and then cement a smaller piece of tubing
SPRING 2015
37
Fig. 4a. Well UTTS-1 log data; this is one of the most extensively cored wells (left).
Fig. 4b. Well UTTS-1 completion with over 600 ft of open hole (right).
across the damaged liner section. If we chose the easier, less

expensive monobore design, this failure and remedy would reduce our ability to run the very tools that we were constructing the well to test.
We therefore chose to go with the more expensive completion well design to allow for workover in the event of liner
failure.
The mechanism of liner failure in this part of the field was
found to be related to the interplay of the characteristics of cement as it sets and the large pressure differential between two
adjacent reservoirs. As cement enters its gel phase during setting, it loses most of its ability to transmit hydrostatic pressure. Therefore, if there is a large pressure differential between
two zones in the cemented section, a flow will develop between them during the gel phase, washing permanent channels
in the cement. We attempted to prevent this by placing inflatable packers in the open hole above and below the overpressure section and inflating them as soon as we finished pumping
the cement, before the cement could begin to gel. Figure 4b
shows the completion status of UTTS-1.
38
SPRING 2015
Data Wells -2 and -3 (UTTS-2 and UTTS-3)
The other two wells, UTTS-2 and UTTS-3, were drilled in the
southeast area of the TTS for testing cross-well related tools,
such as seismic and electromagnetic tools. The wells TD
ended at the Upper Cretaceous formation, Fig. 5a. UTTS-3
was extensively cored, and UTTS-2 was cored to fill a few
gaps of poor or low data recovery in UTTS-1 and UTTS-2.
UTTS-2 was completed with a fiberglass casing to provide
transparency to electromagnetic signals. Figure 5b shows a
typical completion for the shallow wells they were completed with inhibited diesel in the casing.
NORTHWEST WELLS (UTTS-4, UTTS-5 AND UTTS-6)

Three wells have been drilled in the northwest area of the TTS.
We initially planned to drill only two wells (UTTS-4 and
UTTS-5) for cross-well technology related testing purposes.
But after severe lost circulation led to a large washout, Fig. 6,
which invariably affected the cement bond and led to poor
Fig. 5a. Shallow wells UTTS-2 and UTTS-3 (left).

Fig. 5b. Typical completion diagram for shallow wells (right).
Fig. 6. Borehole sizes for all the wells across the Tertiary and Cretaceous formations, showing the effect of curing lost circulation. Well UTTS-6 was drilled as a
replacement well for UTTS-4 because of severe washout and bad cement bond.
acoustic coupling in UTTS-4, a replacement well, UTTS-6, was

drilled. The lost circulation cure using downhole concrete
was initiated and applied in both UTTS-5 and UTTS-6. This
ensured a reasonably gauged hole for good data quality and a

decent cement bond. UTTS-5 was completed with fiberglass
casing, while UTTS-6 was completed with metal casing. Both
SPRING 2015
39
wells were completed with inhibited diesel in the casing, similar to UTTS-2 and UTTS-3.
CURING SEVERE LOSSES IN THE UMM ER RADHUMA

(UER) A SEAT-OF-THE-PANTS APPROACH
Complete mud losses in the UER are quite common and to be
expected while drilling in this area. These losses are considered
incurable, so loss of circulation (LOC) treatment is generally
not attempted for normal oil wells. Previous attempts to cure
these losses with many types of conventional and unconventional lost circulation material (LCM) treatments had proven
ineffective. The standard procedure to deal with losses in this
interval is to drill ahead blind with water and gel sweeps; however, the presence of shales that react with water below the loss
zone often necessitates stopping and setting casing as soon as
possible after the shale is encountered.
In normal operations, there would be very little or no cement behind the casing, and therefore no effective acoustic
coupling, above the loss zones. This isnt critical for normal oil
wells; however, a good cement bond for proper acoustic coupling from casing to formation was required in these geophysical test wells to ensure good vertical seismic profile (VSP) data
acquisition. This VSP logging-driven requirement for acoustic
coupling necessitated a fresh look at this insurmountable
drilling hazard.
Very little geological and geomechanical data had ever been
gathered for the non-reservoir (Tertiary and Cretaceous) intervals in the test well area. The paucity of pertinent geomechanical data necessitated a robust, brute force approach. During
the drilling campaign for the TTS wells, a logical protocol
evolved, and reliable operational procedures were developed in
curing or largely mitigating severe lost circulation. The practice used to cure these losses was a let the well talk to you
approach. This seat-of-the-pants approach was used to successfully construct these wells. The only well that experienced
severe washout and invariably poor cement bond at the early
part of the drilling campaign was UTTS-4.
EXPERIMENTS CONDUCTED DURING THE DRILLING

PHASE
Cementing experiments to cure losses were developed during
the drilling of the producing wells. Complete losses were dealt
with during the drilling of the hole section, which included the
UER formation. Of the attempts to cure the losses, some were
successful, while others were not. Lessons learned while dealing with curing these losses are shown at the conclusion of this
article. Several cementing attempts to gain circulation follow:
Development of Downhole Concrete
Typical oil well cement pumping equipment cannot

pump large aggregate due to the opening of the suction
40
SPRING 2015
and exhaust valves. To develop a downhole concrete,

we dumped some bridging material consisting of a series
of sized aggregate down the hole. The largest was
approximately 2 in length and approximately in
thickness. The smallest was medium calcium carbonate
(CaCO3). Two more intermediate sizes of aggregate
were placed inbetween the large aggregate and the
medium CaCO3. These were finally followed by
medium sized mica.
Cement was then pumped in the well via a drillpipe.
The cement flowed through the aggregate/mica bridging
material to form the downhole concrete.
Generally, this method worked, so drilling could resume
until losses occurred again. Sometimes these losses occurred almost immediately after drilling out the downhole concrete. On other occasions, drilling continued for
several feet while in the UER formation before
experiencing losses.
Cementing Bridging Material Overtreating
An early attempt at developing a bridging material began

with the above formulation of various sized aggregate,
but was followed by cottonseed hulls. When running in
hole with drillpipe, however, the cottonseed hulls were
tagged too high and made a bridge above the previously
dumped material. The question on the rig was whether
perhaps the cottonseed hulls were dumped too rapidly.
The rig had to pull out of hole and run back in with a
clean out assembly to remove the bridged cottonseed
hulls. This was another lesson learned.
Development of a Floating Cement Plug
A floating cement plug was developed in the lab. The

drilling fluid density in the well was 65 pounds per
cubic feet (pcf). The cement developed in the lab
contained hollow glass spheres with a downhole density
of 65 pcf. The objective of developing and pumping this
floating cement plug was to try a different cementing
system to determine if the cost-effectiveness in
reduced rig time, cementing materials and cured LOC
would be beneficial to well
construction.
After the cement was designed in the lab, preparations
were made to pump the new floating cement plug.
During the batch mixing of the cement, the rig only had
neat class G cement on location, so it was decided that
other additives would be placed into the mixing water.
During the mixing of the mix water, when adding the
hollow glass spheres, it was discovered that they were of
low quality, with a specific gravity of 0.75 to the water
specific gravity of 1.002. The resulting density,

measured by the pressurized density balance, was not
below 65 pcf. At that point, it was obvious that with
the materials available to us, we could not make a
floating cement plug. At that point, a quick decision
was made on the rig to add enough cement to bring the
density to 70 pcf. Therefore, the floating cement plug
was never really pumped. This information was added
to the lessons learned. During this project, this cement
system was not attempted again.
Logging Experiments
The uniqueness of the Jurassic well (UTTS-1) provided

the opportunity to conduct a mud logging comparison
between different local service providers.
In addition, a new mud gas technology, being promoted
by one of the service providers at that time as the bestin-class solution to accurately measure gas composition
in the reservoir, was tested, Fig. 73.
DATA ACQUISITION
The TTS is expected to be a fully characterized and well understood environment that will serve as a ground truth for establishing incontrovertible comparisons between new logging
tools and previously proven technologies tested under a similar
environment. Therefore, comprehensive sets of log data were
acquired in each well to establish reasonable baseline data.
All the wells were logged from surface to TD. In addition, over
11,000 ft of cores were acquired in all the wells.
DATA ANALYSIS
Critical to developing a competent geological model of the
TTS is a robust and comprehensive reservoir characterization.
Fig. 7. Results of advanced mud logging in Well UTTS-1 show a perfect match
between the composition derived from mud logging and from the modular
formation dynamics tester sample analysis.
This requires identifying all the main stratigraphic zones, lithofacies and petrophysical properties, such as porosity and permeability, to be used as input into the geo-cellular model.
Following this underpinning objective, a comprehensive logging and coring program was put in place as part of the
drilling campaign. Data acquired in the six wells include advanced mud logging, wireline logs and over 11,000 ft of core
data.
In one of the experiments/tests conducted while drilling, a
new mud gas technology, being promoted by one of the service
providers at that time as the best-in-class solution to accurately
measure gas composition in the reservoir, was tested. The results were compared to the gas compositional analyses derived
from the formation tester modular formation dynamics
tester samples. It is worth highlighting that the results showed
a perfect match.
Three major service providers were involved in the wireline
data acquisition work. The logging program was an extensive
and comprehensive undertaking that went far beyond a typical
logging program for any well. This was necessary to ensure
that all relevant geological and engineering input data for a robust geological earth model was captured at this stage. Wireline logs acquired included, but were not limited to, spectral
gamma ray, vertical and horizontal resistivity, neutron, density,
full wave sonic, magnetic resonance, mineralogy such as elemental capture spectroscopy formation tester and borehole
image logs. Given the sheer volume of data acquired, a systematic workflow was required for achieving effective formation
evaluation results.
A preliminary log analysis was performed on all six wells,
which provided an initial understanding of the lithofacies
encountered and the petrophysical properties used in the geological model. The lithofacies comprise both siliciclastic and
carbonate rocks of the Upper Jurassic (Arab-D) and Tertiary
formations of Saudi Arabia. The shallow stratigraphic interval
encountered in all six wells is predominantly devoid of hydrocarbon charge in this field. Subsequently, the lithostratigraphic
framework was determined to be varied and heterogeneous,
due to the highly variable geological processes that may have
taken place, resulting in a complex depositional and diagenetic
footprint that is often the hallmark of these formations at all
scales. Porosity values range between 10% in tight zones to
over 40% in unconsolidated sections. There is abundant evidence of karsts and thief zones, responsible for lost circulation
in many intervals. Log quality was severely affected across
these zones, which made data interpretation challenging at
best. The image data, CT data and nuclear magnetic resonance
(NMR) data gave some indications of why certain intervals are
unable to withstand a mud weight of 8.33 parts per gallon
(ppg), equivalent to fresh water, while drilling, Fig. 8.
These stratigraphic intervals are not typically logged in this
field because they are never a target of interest during conventional exploration campaigns. This analysis therefore was
aimed at providing vital standardized lithostratigraphic, petroSAUDI ARAMCO JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY
SPRING 2015
41
Fig. 8. CT scan and formation micro-imager data showing intervals that are prone to severe washout.
physical and other engineering parameters for improved understanding of the geology of the drilled sections.
Furthermore, over 11,000 ft of core was cut during the
drilling campaign. Comprehensive core analysis is currently
ongoing. Figure 9 shows the core analysis workflow being
used. A dual energy CT scan has been carried out on some of
the cores, both in-house and by an external service provider.
Core log integration is ongoing, and extensive integration with
other data will be done when significant sets of the core analysis data become available.
The result will be integrated into the analysis routine. Preliminary log analysis results highlight the internal geological
heterogeneity and complexity of the formations. A cross section of the six wells covering the first 2,600 ft TVD is shown
in Fig. 10.
SURFACE FACILITIES
Given the anticipated high number of trial tests that will be
carried out at the TTS and its distance from the head office, it
was planned to have state-of-the-art surface facilities at the
southeast part of the test site. The surface facilities plan includes the construction of about 1,140 m2 of dedicated buildings. These include office space for personnel working at the
test site, a central control room to operate and control subsurface experiments with real-time data transfer capability, a multipurpose room, a conference area for planning experiments
and for holding technology transfer meetings, an equipment
shed and a storage facility. Other facilities at the site include a
maintenance workshop consisting of three bays: mechanical,
hydraulic and electrical/electronic. The workshop will serve as
a field maintenance and repair shop for prototypes or production downhole logging tools; wireline and formation evaluation while drilling tools and other electronic tools that may
require minor repair or maintenance during the trial tests. This
will eliminate the need to ship such tools out of the area or
the country for repair. The site will also have a radioactive
source bunker, located at some distance from the work area,
for temporary storage of radioactive sources that may be
42
SPRING 2015
Fig. 9. Core analysis workflow.
needed for some downhole tools.

In addition, the site will also have its own permanent hoist
(a modified drilling rig) for safe deployment of logging tools
into the test wells. The hoist will have a substructure, an elevated
work floor and a sliding mechanism that will allow it to skid
from one wellhead to another wellhead within the same row of
cellars, if needed. It is anticipated that the hoists derrick floor
will be wider than that of a normal drilling rig to accommodate
the many researchers and scientists who may want to witness
an interesting trial test.
Fig. 10. Log sections across the Tertiary and Cretaceous formations in all the wells (from south to north).
LESSONS LEARNED AND BEST PRACTICES
TTS Value
To develop a knowledge base of best practices in constructing

wells and developing a well test site required many lessons
learned, as documented here.
From a broader perspective, successful implementation of the

TTS as envisioned will be of substantial benefit to Saudi
Aramco and the oil and gas industry at large. Experiences
from existing test centers, with similar but fewer facilities,
which are run by service companies, have shown that the return
on investment can be huge if all the key elements are put in
place. When completed as planned, the value proposition of
the TTS for Saudi Aramco includes, but is not limited to:
Well Construction
The upper hole LOC can be cured. To achieve this,

many attempts are required, using sizing technology to
achieve a bridging medium, for which cement is
dehydrated, to form downhole concrete.
Cement with no fluid loss control or expansion
additives is successful when following the dumped LCM
to create 100% circulation.
The cooperation of rig personnel with drilling engineering expertise and lab support is extremely important in
developing a wellbore that has excellent acoustic
coupling properties.
Many nonstandard procedures can be necessary on the
rig floor to regain circulation.
The choice of high quality cementing service companies
and chemical packages can make or break a successful
cement plug job.
Faster and more reliable testing, qualification and

validation of new technology, equipment and processes.
Acceleration of technology deployment. It is envisaged
that significant time months to years can be
shaved off the current field deployment time of new
technologies, eliminating the constraints of rig time,
costs, oil production deferral and safety issues.
A key enabler for creating and developing new
technology as Saudi Aramco transits to becoming a
creator of value added E&P technology instead of just
a end user of technology. Many emerging technologies
and innovative ideas can be swiftly tested and tried
under normal reservoir conditions.
Provider of a ground truth for establishing
incontestable comparisons between new logging tools
and previously proven technologies tested under similar
environments.
SPRING 2015
43
Enhanced internal R&D capabilities, and external research and technology development partnerships.
An oasis for reliability tests, from component tests
through system integration testing in a controlled and
well-characterized environment.
A companywide location and platform for the execution
of multidisciplinary research projects focusing on oil
and gas discovery and recovery related challenges.
An excellent educational facility for training the next
generation of engineers and scientists especially as
the Kingdom moves toward a knowledge-based
economy.
Promotion of international collaborations and joint
industry projects. With the gamut of geoscience data
collected and its well-characterized test wells, the TTS
can serve as a certification center for new tools and
equipment.
A method to cure lost circulation across the troublesome Cretaceous and Tertiary formations. When fully
implemented, the method developed at the TTS could
lead to a significant reduction in the number of casing
strings deployed in the normal Arab-D oil well. This
will lead to huge savings in the drilling and completion
costs for such wells, especially for the very deep gas
reservoir wells.
FUTURE WORK
To realize one of the key aspirations of the TTS its goal to
be a fully characterized and well understood environment for
testing technology significant effort is being made to fully
analyze and integrate the wealth of subsurface data acquired
to date. Conventional and special analyses of some of the data
are ongoing. Appropriate reservoir models will be built for
each geological zone of interest: Tertiary, Cretaceous and
Jurassic formations. In addition, efforts are being made to
build state-of-the-art surface facilities on the site to expedite
the utilization of the current subsurface assets (wells). Special
hoist/mast and dual downhole lubricators will be deployed in
UTTS-1 to enable safe, convenient and economically feasible
deployment of experimental tools into and out of the wellbore.
CONCLUSIONS
The TTS is a laudable project, which when completed as envisioned will be a unique facility with a huge potential for benefiting Saudi Aramco and the oil and gas industry at large. No
stone was left unturned in acquiring pertinent data for full
characterization of the site to make it a ground truth for
faster and reliable testing, qualification and validation of new
technology. Significant efforts are being made to finalize the description and data analyses for this full characterization of the
44
SPRING 2015
site and also to install state-of-the-art surface facilities. Once

properly equipped, the TTS will be able to undertake technology
tests proposed by Saudi Aramco, partner companies/agencies,
such as service companies, research institutes and universities,
thereby expediting the development and deployment of many
future tools and technologies.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This article would not have been possible without the contributions and efforts of many current and ex-colleagues and
continuous support from Saudi Aramco. In particular we
would like to acknowledge and thank Shiv Dasgupta, Jim
Tucker, Jim Funk, Ton Loermans, Bob Greaves, Richard
Palmer, Emmanuel Nwosu, Eid Al-Enezi, Ayedh Al-Dossary,
Jason Hubbard, Sinan Caliskan, Alberto Marsala, Clemons
Van Dijk and many others for their contributions.
Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE,
November 10-13, 2014.
REFERENCES
1. Powers, R.W., Ramirez, L.F., Redmond, C.D. and Elberg
Jr., E.L.: Geology of the Arabian Peninsula: Sedimentary
Geology of Saudi Arabia, U.S. Geological Survey
Professional Paper 560-D, U.S. Geological Survey, 1966.
2. Keho, T.H. and Kelamis, P.G.: A New Era in Land
Seismic: The Near Surface Challenge, SEG paper 20093421, presented at the SEG Annual Meeting, Houston,
Texas, October 25-30, 2009.
3. Loermans, T., Bradford, C.M., Kimour, F., Karoum, R.,
Meridji, Y., Kasprzykowski, P., et al.: Advanced Mud
Logging (AML) Aids Formation Evaluation and Drilling,
and Yields Precise Hydrocarbon Fluid Composition, SPE
paper 141277, presented at the SPE Middle Oil and Gas
Show and Conference, Manama, Bahrain, September 2528, 2011.
BIOGRAPHIES
Modiu L. Sanni is the Focus Area
Champion for Saudi Aramcos
Technology Test Site (TTS)
development initiative. He is a
Petroleum Engineering Consultant with
the Reservoir Engineering Technology
Division of Saudi Aramcos
Exploration and Petroleum Engineering Center Advanced
Research Center (EXPEC ARC). Prior to joining Saudi
Aramco in 2004, Modiu worked for Shell for about 15
years in Africa, Europe and the Middle East in various
capacities. In addition to TTS, he is also involved in
research efforts relating to enhanced oil recovery and
formation evaluation.
Modiu received both his B.S. and M.S. degrees in
Mechanical Engineering from the University of Ibadan,
Ibadan, Nigeria.
Scott S. Jennings is the Group Leader
for cementing at Saudi Aramcos
Exploration and Petroleum Engineering
Center Advanced Research Center
(EXPEC ARC). He has 32 years of
experience in cementing. Prior to
joining Saudi Aramco in 1987, Scott
assumed duties that included stimulation, cementing and
sand control with Halliburton Co. in East Texas and the
Middle East region. His areas of interest are developing
standards and test equipment, well construction, gas
migration prevention and long-term cement durability.
Scott is the Saudi Aramco voting member of the American
Petroleum Institute Subcommittee 10 and a long-term
member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE).
In 1980, he received his B.S. degree in Chemistry from
Angelo State University, San Angelo, TX.
Dr. Michael A. Jervis is currently
Group Leader Reservoir Geophysics
with the Geophysical Technology Team
in the Exploration and Petroleum
Research Center (EXPEC ARC) where
he has been for the past 12 years.
His first job was as a field geologist in Australia, but he
has since worked as a geophysicist in various companies
based in the U.S., including Exxon, Western Atlas Logging
and TomoSeis. Life as a geophysicist has carried Michael to
Canada, Mexico, Venezuela, Tunisia and Egypt, working in
both well logging and seismic service companies.
He received his B.S. degree in Geology from the
University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western
Australia, an M.S. degree in Apllied Physics from Curtin
University of Technology, Perth, Western Austrailia, and his
Ph.D. degree in Geophysics from the University of Texas at
Austin, Austin, TX.
Christopher B. Ayadiuno is currently a

Petrophysicist with the Geology
Technology Team of Saudi Aramcos
Exploration and Petroleum Engineering
Center Advanced Research Center
(EXPEC ARC). He has over 23 years
of oil and gas industry experience
covering business development, information technology
support, exploration geological operations and research.
Chris received his B.S. degree in Applied Geophysics
from the Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria.
He is an active member of many professional
organizations.
Razally M. Ali is a Reservoir Engineer
with Saudi Aramcos Uthmaniyah
Reservoir Management Unit. He has
18 years of industry experience. Prior
to joining Saudi Aramco in 2006,
Razally worked as a Reservoir
Engineer for Petronas Carigali in
Malaysia and for Brunei Shell Petroleum, and with Shell
Expro in Aberdeen, Scotland, and Woodside Petroleum in
Perth, Australia. He also spent 4 years with Schlumberger
(Consulting Services) formulating integrated field
development plans and production optimization projects
for operators.
Razally received his B.Eng. and M.S. degrees in
Petroleum Engineering from the Imperial College London,
London, U.K.
He is a member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers
(SPE).
Husain N. Al-Najrani is a Petroleum
Engineer in Saudi Aramcos Reservoir
Description and Simulation
Department. Since joining Saudi
Aramco in 2002, he was worked as an
Operational Petrophysicist in the
Southern Area Petrophysical Unit.
Husain received his B.S. degree in Petroleum
Engineering from Montana Tech of the University of
Montana, Butte, MT. He is a member of the Society of
Petroleum Engineers (SPE).
SPRING 2015
45
Intelligent Field Real-Time Data

Reliability Key Performance Indices
Authors: Abdulrahman A. Al-Amer, Naser A. Al-Naser, Muhammad M. Al-Gosayir
and Waleed Y. Al-Awadh
ABSTRACT
The dependence on intelligent field real-time data for oil and
gas operations has significantly increased in the past few years.
High frequency real-time data is the baseline of critical analysis and decisions that can lead to maximized oil and gas recovery, increased revenue and reduced environmental impact.
Acquiring that data is a complex process. A massive amount of
intelligent field real-time data is acquired continuously from
numerous instruments and transmitted through several distributed systems located in different area networks.
The challenge that is facing oil and gas companies is to keep
the continuous data flow reliable. To achieve this objective, it is
mandatory to continuously monitor the health of the field data
quality and flow, the fields instruments and the communication
systems. In addition, any unreliable data or communication
failure must be addressed immediately and treated as a high
priority item if companies are to ensure the full availability of
reliable data, ready to be processed and analyzed.
This article will highlight Saudi Aramcos experience in
improving intelligent field data reliability by developing key
performance indices (KPIs). These indices classify the assessment of data reliability into three main categories: Data Definition and Configuration, Data and Systems Availability, and
Data Quality. Each category consists of a group of indices that
contribute to the main category, and each category contributes
to the overall data reliability KPI.
INTRODUCTION
As intelligent field technology evolves in the upstream oil and
gas industry, the need to have a continuous and reliable feed of
real-time data has significantly increased. Measuring the data
acquisition efficiency across various intelligent field infrastructure nodes remains a challenging task, especially for large oil
and gas companies. Without a clear key performance index
(KPI) measurement across various intelligent field nodes, the
tracking of infrastructure deployment progress compared to
the original plan becomes a very difficult task. Therefore,
identifying infrastructure reliability, performance and value
becomes even more difficult.
Establishing KPIs against best practices helps the company
46
SPRING 2015
not only to realize the full potential value from the investment,
but also to build an infrastructure foundation that is flexible
and reliable. This is essential if systems are to feed the integration and optimization layers in the intelligent field projects with
quality data that can be converted into knowledge. Production
and reservoir management engineers are required to make and
immediately implement decisions to prolong the reservoir, the
wells and the instruments lives. These decisions must be made
based on reliable data, which comes from the instruments in the
field and well sites. Saudi Aramco has developed and implemented several intelligent field standards, specifications and
guidelines to follow when treating and managing the enormous
real-time data flow in terms of enhancing integrity, quality,
availability and reliability. The ultimate goal for these measures and enforcements is to ensure the high availability of reliable intelligent field real-time data1. Intelligent field network
implementation consists of two major components. The first
component is the real-time data capturing and transmission
systems, which include instruments, remote terminal units
(RTUs), supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA)
systems, etc. The second component is data management and
reliability assurance2.
INTELLIGENT FIELD NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE

Real-time data at Saudi Aramco traverses multiple zones of instrumentation, networks and data servers before it reaches the
corporate database and an engineers desktop. Data captured
by a sensor is transmitted to the RTU, which collects all the
wells sensors and equipment data and sends it to the SCADA
control system in the plant. Then the real-time data passes
through several plant information (PI) systems, after which it
gets processed and pushed by the complex event processing
(CEP) agents. It eventually resides in the upstream corporate
database.
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS

As previously mentioned, the intelligent field network is complicated and has several nodes, which presents challenges for
the monitoring and detecting of any data delivery failures.
Over time, different real-time data transmission and reliability
issues have been captured and analyzed. A knowledge base has

been built from experiences in such an environment. It classifies the common data problems into two main categories, each
with subcategories, as follows:
Data Transmission Failures: This failure could occur
due to a control systems transmission failure, such as a
failure in the RTU, SCADA, De-Militarized Zone
(DMZ), PI and CEP systems.
Data Reliability Issues: Reliability comes under question
if the data doesnt meet the quality checks that are
defined by Saudi Aramco standards, guidelines and
specifications.
good data. Data is considered unrealible in the following

cases:
Out of Range Data: Each data type has its own value
ranges, which are defined during the data configuration
process. The received data has to fall into the normal
range for that data. Otherwise, the data is labeled as
unreliable.
Negative Data: None of the upstream data is expected
to have a negative value. Pressure readings, rate value
frequencies and all other values should be positive
values. Any negative data is labeled as unreliable.
DATA TRANSMISSION FAILURES
Frozen Data: The received data should be changing over

time, responding to the variables in the reservoir, well
and surrounding conditions. Any stuck values that are
not changing over time are labeled as unreliable.
This category deals with monitoring the data transmission systems health and identifying any data delivery interruptions. As
the network consists of multiple nodes namely RTU,
SCADA, DMZ and PI systems and CEP agents it is difficult
to identify in which node the data stopped when a data transmission interruption occurs. An innovative solution is needed to
monitor and detect the root cause of data transmission failures.
Cross Checking Failure: Data changes should make

logical sense if they are viewed together. For example,
any increase of the oil production rate should come
with an increase in the wellhead pressure and
temperature. Data that doesnt pass cross checking is
labeled as unreliable data.
DATA RELIABILITY ISSUES

Even if the real-time data reaches the upstream database without interruption, it has to be reliable and trustworthy for the
petroleum engineers to make correct decisions. The data has to
pass several reliability checks to be considered reliable. These
checks are:
1. Data Configuration and Integrity: The required sensor data
has to be configured in all layers of the intelligent field data
flow network to be transmitted to the upstream database.
Configuration has to follow the tag configuration standards,
including naming conventions, data identifications, data
types, equipment types, installation locations and many
more parameters, all of which must meet internal Saudi
Aramco standards3, 4 based on ISA-5.1.
2. Data Availability: Data availability here refers to the partial
data flow interruptions that occur because of instrument,
interface or communication problems, rather than data
transmission system failure. Sometimes, the sensor stops
sending data due to a defective instrument, cabling issues or
a communication disconnection. This check is to ensure the
required data is always available to the data users who need
it to monitor, diagnose and analyze the reservoir or well
performance. This check also includes the so-called stale
readings, where the data has time issues, either delayed or
futuristic.
3. Data Quality: This check is to ensure the received data is of
good quality and ready to be used by petroleum engineers
in making their decisions. The data quality check consists of
several standards the data has to meet before it is labeled as
Noisy Data: Noisy data refers to data that is fluctuating

across a very large range, indicating that the gauge
needs to be calibrated. This type of data is labeled as
unreliable.
Figure 1 shows some examples of data quality assessments,
including readings of normal data, frozen data and out of
range data.
Figure 2 summarizes the three data reliability categories.
Fig. 1. Data quality case study, showing readings for (1) normal data, (2) frozen
data, and (3) out of range data.
Fig. 2. Data reliability KPIs.
SPRING 2015
47
PROPOSED SOLUTION
One objective of the implementation of the intelligent field
concept in Saudi Aramco is to provide petroleum engineers
with reliable real-time data that will help them to optimize the
reservoir and well performance as well as optimize the cost of
attending to a remote wells activities. Because unexpected
events can affect the data reliability, the objective of this proposed solution is to develop an integrated solution that consists of several utilities. Each utility addresses one or more of
the reliability measures that contribute to the overall data reliability KPI.
Fig. 4. Intelligent field equipment status report.
Data Transmission Monitoring
Data Availability
To monitor the real-time data from/to transmission systems

and detect any data availability issue, an engine was developed
that uses innovative logical data flow grouping techniques to
detect the root cause of the data transmission failure. This
methodology detects the health of each transmission system,
including the sensors and the equipment. The engine is capable
of providing the historical status of each node to evaluate its
performance over time, Fig. 3.
To monitor the sensor data availability in the upstream database and map it to its equipment, this utility produces a detailed report and list of sensors that are not transmitting data
and sends it to the engineers desktop. In addition, the utility is
capable of grouping the sensors data by its field and providing
an overall field performance status in terms of data availability
over a period of time.
Data Quality
Data Configuration and Integrity
To monitor the data configuration status and detect any discrepancy between the equipment as installed and the data configuration in the upstream database, this utility was designed
to integrate multiple data sources to provide a comprehensive
overview of the field instrumentations health status. The output of this utility is a report showing the instruments in the
field, from the time the equipment is installed until it transmits
the real-time data, including the commissioning and connectivity stages. Not only this, it also signals whether the equipment
is transmitting reliable data or not, using the other reliability
checks, Fig. 4. This engine has the potential to be integrated
with other solutions to automate maintenance request activities and measure the maintenance teams performance5.
Fig. 3. Data transmission monitoring report.
48
SPRING 2015
To detect data quality issues, this utility labels the received

data as good quality if the data passes all quality checks previously described. Briefly, the good data should be within the defined ranges, not frozen, make sense and fluctuate in a stable
manner. The output of this utility is a detailed report of the
data quality issues in selected fields, Fig. 5.
IN-HOUSE DEVELOPED SOLUTION

The goal is a comprehensive integrated solution that monitors
the data transmission and reliability, and detects any failure or
discrepancy. Therefore, in addition to the engines and utilities
that were previously mentioned, more features have been
developed and added to the solution to enable support organizations with the necessary tools and functionalities to respond
proactively. The additional features include:
Remedial Workflows. In the case of real-time data transmission failure, a remedial workflow is submitted automatically to
the control systems support organizations to take corrective
actions to fix the issue, whether it is software, hardware or
communication related. The data transmission systems should
be up and running 24/7. If the system is not fixed within a defined time frame, the workflow will be escalated to a higher
management level.
Data Recovery Monitoring. During the data transmission
system downtime, the collected data should be backed up and
then restored to all transmission systems upon resolution of
the problem. Therefore, a utility has been developed to monitor
the data flow after resolution of the problem. The output of
Fig. 5. Data reliability status report.
this utility is a comparison chart for the data availability before and after the problems resolution. These charts help data
users to identify the missing data and the period when that
happened, Fig. 6.
Data Reliability Analysis (Heat Map). This feature of the
system provides petroleum engineers and other data users with
tools to analyze the data transmission and its reliability over a
period of time and so to identify the best period to conduct an
analysis or case study. Figure 7 shows the data transmission
and reliability readings in a color-coded format. From this
chart, the engineer can find the best periods, i.e., periods with
good data, to conduct his/her case study; an engineer can also
identify and investigate the bad periods.
BUSINESS IMPACT
The purpose of developing this data monitoring solution is to
improve the data transmission systems and data reliability for
petroleum engineers and other data users who rely on the data
to make their decisions. This solution helped to increase the
real-time data transmission system availability by 33% in
seven months as teams tackled the issues highlighted and reported by the system. Moreover, the solution helped to improve the data reliability in the upstream database by 23% in
the same period. The comprehensive in-house developed solution
provides an interactive environment for the petroleum
engineers to use to monitor, visualize and maintain the intelligent field components health.
CONCLUSION
Saudi Aramco has been investing in intelligent field infrastructure to provide petroleum engineers with real-time data at
their desktops for better management of oil and gas fields. To
maintain the data integrity and reliability, Saudi Aramco established a comprehensive solution that enables engineers to monitor the data quality and transmission reliability from their
offices. This solution consists of several components that monitor data transmission reliability, the integrity of data definitions and configuration, data availability and data quality in
addition to initiating remedial workflows that are tracked
when a data problem occurs. This solution improves the intelligent field reliability, safety and efficiency.
The solution also provides a one-stop shop solution for all
reliability indices, which minimizes the assigned engineers efforts to detect any transmission failure or data quality issue.
The system allows users to monitor one or more fields at the
same time. This solution provides real-time alerting and alarming in case of any data discrepancy or interruption, thereby
maximizing safety and increasing data accuracy and reliability.
SPRING 2015
49
Fig. 6. Data transmission recovery status report.
This article was presented at the International Petroleum

Technology Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, December
10-12, 2014.
REFERENCES
1. Al-Amer, A.A., Al-Gosayir, M., Al-Naser, N. and AlTowaileb, H.: Real Time Data: Interactive Monitoring of
Data Flow for Continuous and Reliable Data Transmission, SPE paper 167418, presented at the SPE Middle
East Intelligent Energy Conference and Exhibition, Dubai,
UAE, October 28-30, 2013.
Fig. 7. Historical data reliability heat map.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
50
SPRING 2015
2. Naser, N.A. and Awaji, M.A.: Intelligent Field Data

Management: Case Study, SPE paper 149040, presented
at the SPE/DGS Saudi Arabia Section Technical Symposium
and Exhibition, al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia, May 15-18,
2011.
3. Al-Dhubaib, T.A., Issaka, M.B., Barghouty, M.F., Al-
Mubarak, S.M., Dowais, A.H., Shenqiti, M.S., et al.:

Saudi Aramco Intelligent Field Development Approach:
Building the Surveillance Layer, SPE paper 112106,
presented at the Intelligent Energy Conference and
Exhibition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, February 25-27,
2008.
4. Al-Dhubaib, T.A., Shenqiti, M.S., Al-Madi, S.M. and AlMansour, A.M.: Intelligent Field Data Acquisition and
Delivery Infrastructure: Case Study, SPE paper 112201,
presented at the Intelligent Energy Conference and
Exhibition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, February 25-27,
2008.
5. Ruvalcaba Velarde, S.A. and Al-Ghamdi, A.A.: The
Impact of an Infrastructure Reliability and Data
Communication Index on Improving Intelligent Field
Operation in an Oil Field in Saudi Arabia, SPE paper
164400, presented at the SPE Middle East Oil and Gas
Show and Conference, Manama, Bahrain, March 10-13,
2013.
BIOGRAPHIES
Abdulrahman A. Al-Amer is a
Petroleum Engineering System Analyst
in the Intelligent Field and Producing
Systems Division of Saudi Aramcos
Petroleum Engineering Application
Services Department, where he is
intensively working with intelligent
field visualization environments and real-time data
handling. Abdulrahmans experience also includes work as
a Plant Information System Administrator and as a Plant
Engineer in the Safaniyah onshore plant.
He received his B.S. degree in Industrial Engineering
from King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
(KFUPM), Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Muhammad M. Al-Gosayir is a
Petroleum Engineering Systems
Analyst with the Intelligent Fields and
Production Systems Division in Saudi
Aramcos Petroleum Engineering
Application Services Department. He
has been with Saudi Aramco since 2007.
Muhammad received his B.S. degree in Software
Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, in 2007. In
2012, he received his M.S. degree in Petroleum Engineering
from the University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Waleed Y. Al-Awadh is a Petroleum
Engineering Systems Consultant with
Saudi Aramcos Intelligent Fields
Systems Division. He joined Saudi
Aramco in 1987, working at the
Exploration and Petroleum
Engineering Center (EXPEC) in the
Computing Technology Division as a Database Designer
and Administrator. During Waleeds 27 years of working in
the IT field, he has contributed to EXPEC in both technical
and managerial disciplines.
Waleed is a member of the Society of Petroleum
Engineers (SPE) and a member of the Dhahran Toastmasters Club, where he serves as a mentor to young
Saudis, developing their talents and directing them
effectively to improve their communication and
presentation skills.
Waleed received his B.S. degree in Computer Science
from Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan,
in 1987.
Naser A. Al-Naser is a Petroleum

Engineering System Analyst in Saudi
Aramcos Petroleum Engineering
Application Services Department. He
has 11 years of experience in providing
and supporting software solutions for
E&P upstream operating systems,
mainly in the real-time domain.
In 2002, Naser received his B.S. degree in Computer
Science from King Fahd University of Petroleum and
Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, and in 2008,
he received his M.S. degree in Petroleum Engineering from
Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland.
SPRING 2015
51
Use of the Rietveld Method for Describing

Structure and Texture in XRD Data of Scale
Deposits Formed in Oil and Gas Pipelines:
An Important Industrial Challenge
Authors: Dr. Husin Sitepu, Dr. Syed R. Zaidi and Dr. Shouwen Shen
ABSTRACT
Texture, or crystallographic preferred orientation, in crystalline
materials is a common feature of experimental X-ray powder
diffraction (XRD) data. Preferred orientation can cause serious
systematic errors in both quantitative phase analysis and crystal structure determination. Studies show that the generalized
spherical harmonic (GSH) description provides a better Rietveld
fit than the March model for the uniaxially pressed molybdite
and calcite powders1-3. Therefore, it was recommended to use
the GSH description for correction of the preferred orientation
in XRD and neutron diffraction analyses, for both crystal
structure refinement and quantitative phase analysis. In the
present study, the GSH description was extended to describe
crystal structure and texture in the XRD data of scale deposits
formed in an amine trim cooler. The results revealed that the
structural refinement parameter obtained from the Rietveld refinement with the GSH description agreed well with the corresponding single crystal structure. Additionally, the GSH
description provided better results for the materials investigated
in the present study than the March model. Therefore, the GSH
approach should be used for preferred orientation correction
in XRD Rietveld analysis, for both crystal structure refinement
and phase composition analyses.
Corrosion deposits formed in oil and gas pipelines can cause

major operational problems and can frequently shut down
plants. X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) allows the direct
measurement of the phase content4 in corrosion deposits.
When analysts perform a quantitative phase analysis of the
identified compounds using the Rietveld method, they frequently assume that the corrosion deposits in oil and gas
pipelines are randomly oriented. The powder samples, however,
often have a preferred orientation, meaning that one or more
of the XRD peaks may be missing. This crystallographic preferred orientation is a common feature of XRD patterns for
experimental powders, and can cause serious systematic errors
in subsequent quantitative phase analysis and crystal structure
determination1-3, 5-10. Therefore, achieving a comprehensive
quantification of the various phases of corrosion deposits
SPRING 2015
(1)
where the first term is the Bragg scattering containing a scale
factor, S, a correction factor, K, a structure factor, Fh, and a
profile function, P(Th), as determined by the displacement,
Th, of the profile point from the reflection position; the second term, Yb, is the background intensity. The sum is the total
of overall profile points in all the scans included in the refinements. Within K in Eqn. 1 is a term that describes the change
in intensity for a Bragg reflection due to texture2, 3. The March
(1932)12 model and generalized spherical harmonic (GSH) description are described as follows.
The March-Dollase Preferred Orientation Factor for
Powder Diffraction
INTRODUCTION
52
using XRD with a Rietveld method is an important industrial

challenge.
The Rietveld refinement method adjusts the refinable parameters until the best fit of the entire calculated pattern to the
entire measured pattern is achieved. Additionally, the refined
atomic parameters should agree well with the structure derived
from the single-crystal XRD data. In the General Structure
Analysis System (GSAS) Rietveld refinement program11, a
mathematical method has been developed that calculates an
intensity, Yc, at every point in the pattern, i.e.,
The March model proposed by Dollase (1986)5 is based on the

function:
(2)
where j is the angle between the direction of crystallographic
preferred orientation and the reciprocal-lattice vector for the
Bragg peak that is corrected. The single March r-parameter
controls the distribution shape. In addition, the r-parameter is
an index of the extent of preferred direction, being unity for
ideal random orientation powder diffraction data. The March
model does not require the use of data acquired with a multiaxis diffractometer for the correction of intensities due to the
preferred orientation direction effects. The March model is
o
o
symmetric and smooth across j = 0 and j = 90 . It also yields
a preferred orientation correction factor, which has either a

o
maximum or minimum at j = 0 , and can be normalized over
the full 2 j angular range. The normalization is important in
that changes in the preferred orientation correction factor
shape conserve the total intensity within the powder diffraction
pattern3.
The GSH Texture Correction Factor
To apply the GSH description2, 13-15, which is generated using

selection rules depending on the crystal symmetry of the phase
under investigation, the general axis distribution A(, ,
is used:
(3)
The
and
harmonic terms take on values according to the crystal and sample symmetries, respectively.
These symmetry modified terms correspond to the angular
portions of the atomic orbitals familiar to chemists. Terms
with l = 0 correspond to s-orbitals, and so are not useful for
describing preferred orientation. Since diffraction patterns
ignoring the effects of resonant scattering are centrosymmetric, terms with l = odd numbered values, which yield
non-centrosymmetric orbitals, are not useful for describing
preferred orientation. Terms with l = 2 correspond to d-orbitals, l = 4 correspond to g-orbitals, etc.3. In the diffraction
experiment, the crystal coordinates, (, and sample coordinates, ( ,), are determined by the choice of reflection index,
hkl, and sample orientation on the diffractometer, respectively.
The texture is then completely described by the set of C1mn as
determined from Rietveld refinement with a GSH description.
In the case of XRD and neutron diffraction data having an
ideal random orientation, all the harmonic coefficients are
zero; therefore, the general axis distribution is unity. The magnitude of the texture can be evaluated from the texture index,
J13, as follows:
(4)
Least squares of optimization of Rietveld parameters, i.e.,
minimization of residual over n observation, are calculated
from the following equation:
(5)
where wi is the weighting factor for phase i, Yi is the measured
intensity, and Yci is the calculated intensity, Eqn. 1. The sum is
the total of overall profile points in all the scans included in
the refinement. The usual residuals used in the Rietveld refinement, Rp and Rwp, are given by:
(6)
(7)
The objectives of the present study were to characterize the

preferred orientation and perform crystal structure refinement
using XRD data collected from uniaxially pressed scale deposits from an amine trim cooler. The data were analyzed, initially assuming a random orientation of the crystallites, and
subsequently the preferred orientation correction was applied
using the March model. The GSH description was independently used as a complementary method to correct the intensities due to the preferred orientation effects.
EXPERIMENTAL
The starting material was considered to be excellent for this
study because high quality crystal structures of calcite16 had
been reported in it. The starting powders were manually
ground in an agate mortar and a pestle for several minutes
to achieve a fine particle size2. Then the fine powder was
mounted into the XRD sample holder by back pressing. Additionally, a substantial level of preferred orientation was introduced during the specimen preparation to replicate scale
deposits. Approximately 4 g of the fine powders was uniaxially pressed in a cylindrical steel die that was 3.1 cm in diameter at a pressure of 685 MPa, 1355 MPa, 2035 MPa and
2705 MPa. The height of the resulting disk for each pressure
was approximately 0.6 cm. Sitepu et al. (2005)2 have indicated
that as the uniaxial pressure increases, the level of preferred
orientation increases. Because the specimen preparation procedures were reproducible2, we used the same technique to assess
the general applicability of the GSH description to the present
study.
Step-scanned patterns were measured with an X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku Ultima IV) with a copper X-ray tube
(=1.5406 ). A monochromator and a proportional detector
were used in conjunction with a 0.67 divergence slit, a 0.67
scattering slit and a 0.3 mm receiving slit at instrument settings
of 40 kV and 40 mA. The XRD data were measured from 10
to 140 in 2 Bragg-angle, using a step size of 0.04 and a
counting time of 1 per minute. Then the software package
(High Score Plus, PANalytical B.V.), combined with the International Center for Diffraction Data (ICDD) and Powder Diffraction File (PDF) databases as the standard reference
materials, was used for the phase identification, i.e., qualitative
analysis. Note that the phase identification results showed that
the scale deposit was calcite. Table 1 shows the XRD pattern
measurement condition.
The Rietveld refinements were performed with the GSAS
software package11. The refinement strategy was similar to
that described by Sitepu et al. (2005)2. The structural model
used for the calcite single crystal XRD data was described16 as
the ICDD and PDF entry 01-086-2339. The refined parameters were similar to that described by Sitepu et al. (2005)2,
which are phase scale factors and the background component
of the patterns with an eight-parameter Chebyshev polynomial,
lattice parameters, the instrument zero-point 2o (offset in the
SPRING 2015
53
2 scale of goniometer), the Lorentzian and the Gaussian

terms of a pseudo-Voigt profile function and anisotropic strain
parameters17, structural parameters, i.e., x,y,z and frac, and
isotropic thermal parameters (Uiso). After the preliminary refinement without preferred orientation correction had converged, the GSH coefficients1-3, 9, 10, 15, 18 were then included.
The default sample texture symmetry was chosen to be cylindrical or fiber texture. Sixth-order harmonics were selected
following preliminary calculations using eight orders that
yielded the same figure of merit and goodness-of-fit index (GFI).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Table 2 depicts the unit-cell parameters of the uniaxially
pressed calcite at a pressure of 0 MPa, 685 MPa, 1355
MPa, 2035 MPa and 2705 MPa, obtained from the Rietveld
refinement with the March model and the GSH description.
The numbers in parentheses give the estimated standard uncertainty for the least significant figure of the parameter. The refined unit-cell agreed well with the corresponding single crystal
XRD results for calcite16.
Table 3 shows the structural parameters of the uniaxially
Name
Description
Instrument
Rigaku Ultima IV multipurpose X-ray diffractometer

Copper-anode tube operated at 40 kV and 40 mA
Radiation
Wavelength: Cu Ka1 = 1.54060

BraggBrentano, measuring circle diameter = 480 mm
Optics
Divergence slit: 0.67, scattering slit: 0.67 and receiving slit = 0.3 mm
Holder: rectangular format, dimension 22 mm x 22 mm
Specimen
Rotation on for all measurements

Detector
Position sensitive detector

Angular range in 2i: 10140, and step size: 0.04
Acquisition
Scan rate: 1 per minute

Table 1. XRD pattern measurement conditions
Parameters
This Study
Maslen et al.
(1995)16
0 MPa
68 MPa
135 MPa
203 MPa
a ()
4.97612(5)
4.9770(6)
4.9780(5)
4.9784(6)
4.9779(8)
4.988(2)
b ()
4.97612(5)
4.9770(6)
4.9780(5)
4.9784(6)
4.9779(8)
4.988(2)
17.0893(10)
17.0947(21)
17.0980(20)
17.0988(21)
17.0926(30)
17.068(2)
366.468(33)
366.71(11)
366.93(10)
367.01(11)
366.80(16)
367.8(3)
a ()
4.97630(15)
4.9771(5)
4.9781(5)
4.9785(5)
4.9782(7)
4.988(2)
b ()
4.97630(15)
4.9771(5)
4.9781(5)
4.9785(5)
4.9782(7)
4.988(2)
c ()
17.0904(9)
17.0959(9)
17.0991(19)
17.0997(19)
17.0944(24)
17.068(2)
V ()3
366.520(31)
366.76(9)
366.97(9)
367.05(10)
366.88(13)
367.8(3)
4.9779(5)
4.9783(5)
4.9791(6)
4.988(2)
270 MPa
Random orientation
c ()
V ()
The March model
The generalized spherical harmonics (GSH) description

a ()
4.97645(14)
4.9770(4)
b ()
4.97645(14)
4.9770(4)
4.9779(5)
4.9783(5)
4.9791(6)
4.988(2)
c ()
17.0915(9)
17.0978(16)
17.1005(18)
17.1012(17)
17.1002(20)
17.068(2)
V ()3
366.564(30)
366.79(9)
366.98(9)
367.04(9)
367.15(11)
367.8(3)
Table 2. Summary of the refined cell parameters of the uniaxially pressed scale deposit from an amine cooler (calcite-CaCO3) obtained from Rietveld refinement with random
orientation, the March model and the GSH description
54
SPRING 2015
Atomic
Positions
This Study
0 MPa
Maslen et al.
(1995)16
68 MPa
135 MPa
203 MPa
270 MPa
0.0186(5)
0.0198(6)
0.0133(5)
0.0199(6)
0.0213(7)
0.00988(3)
0.0109(16)
0.0059(17)
0.0047(16)
0.0068(18)
0.0022(20)
00834(9)
0.2530(4)
0.2536(5)
0.2549(5)
0.2519(5)
0.2514(6)
0.25700(6)
0.0231(11)
0.0242(11)
0.0260(13)
01129(7)
Random orientation (r = 1.00)

Ca(0,0,0)
Uiso
C(0,0,1/4)
Uiso
O(x,0,1/4)
Uiso
0.0264(10)
0.0258(10)
RP
10.23
10.94
10.78
12.03
12.68
RWP
13.99
14.54
14.14
15.97
13.61
R(F2)
11.19
13.50
11.08
14.55
14.55
1.94
1.85
1.81
2.68
2.80
0.0162(5)
0.0145(5)
0.0100(5)
0.0151(6)
0.0142(6)
0.00988(3)
0.0110(16)
0.0063(15)
0.0052(16)
0.0066(17)
0.0029(17)
00834(9)
0.2544(4)
0.2561(5)
0.2565(5)
0.2542(5)
0.2547(6)
0.25700(6)
Uiso
0.0247(9)
0.0218(10)
0.0204(10)
0.0203(11)
0.0208(11)
01129(7)
RP
9.75
9.55
10.05
10.53
8.56
The March model

Ca(0,0,0)
Uiso
C(0,0,1/4)
Uiso
O(x,0,1/4)
RWP
13.30
12.92
13.35
14.49
12.01
R(F2)
10.15
10.97
10.12
12.16
13.76
l2
1.32
1.77
1.61
2.21
2.25
0.854(7)
0.839(7)
0.807(6)
0.801(5)
0.758(5)
The generalized spherical harmonics description

Ca(0,0,0)
Uiso
0.0175(5)
0.0154(5)
0.0110(5)
0.0159(5)
0.0174(5)
0.00988(3)
0.0161(16)
0.0127(15)
0.0096(16)
0.0134(17)
0.0104(15)
00834(9)
0.2539(7)
0.2540(7)
0.2568(7)
0.2538(7)
0.2501(8)
0.25700(6)
Uiso
0.0286(10)
0.0271(11)
0.0233(11)
0.0246(11)
0.0299(12)
01129(7)
RP
8.82
7.67
8.80
8.56
8.24
12.24
12.68
11.65
C(0,0,1/4)
Uiso
O(x,0,1/4)
RWP
12.50
11.03
R(F2)
8.24
5.94
7.11
7.31
6.45
l2
1.55
1.29
1.36
1.69
1.39
1.017
1.026
1.048
1.065
1.093
Table 3. Summary of the Rietveld refinement results for the uniaxially pressed scale deposit from an amine trim cooler (calcite). The space group used was R-3c (No. 167).
Wyckoff coordinates: 6(c) are 0,0,0 and 0,0,1/2; 6(a) are 0,0,3/4; and 18(e) are x,0,1/4; -x,-x,1/4;-x,0,3/4;0,-x,3/4 and x,x,3/4. Cell formula unit Z=6 and formula weight =
100.09
SPRING 2015
55
pressed calcite at pressures of 0 MPa, 685 MPa, 1355 MPa,

2035 MPa and 2705 MPa obtained from the Rietveld refinement with a GSH description. The numbers in parentheses
give the estimated standard uncertainty for the least significant

figure of the parameter. The refined structural parameters
agreed quite satisfactorily with the corresponding single crystal
Fig. 1. The agreement between the calculated and measured XRD patterns for the unpressed calcite powders at 0 MPa (left) and the unixially pressed powders at 2705
MPa (right), following Rietveld refinement with (a) random orientation, (b) March model, and (c) GSH description for preferred orientation correction. The observed data
are indicated by a plus sign and the calculated pattern is the continuous line in the same field. The sets of vertical lines below the profiles represent the positions of all
possible Bragg reflections. The lower plot is the difference between the measured and calculated patterns on the same scale as the measured and calculated patterns.
56
SPRING 2015
XRD results for calcite16.

It can also be seen from Table 3 that the crystallographic
R-factors, RP, RWP and R(F2), and the GFI, (2), improved
when the intensities were corrected using the March model
and the GSH description. The March model appears to provide adequate preferred orientation representation for a moderate level of preferred orientation only. Unlike the Rietveld
refinement with the GSH description, the Rietveld refinement
of the same XRD data sets with the March model increasingly
gave both the crystallographic R-factors and the GFI values for
the uniaxially pressed powders that had the March r-parameter of less than approximately 0.9. Therefore, the GSH description approach should be used for preferred orientation
correction in the XRD Rietveld analysis, for both crystal structure refinement and phase composition analyses.
Figures 1a, 1b and 1c show the agreement between the calculated and measured XRD patterns for the unpressed powder
and the uniaxially pressed powder at a pressure of 2705 MPa,
following Rietveld refinement with random orientation the
March model and GSH description for preferred orientation

correction. The GSH description provides better goodness-of-fit
values than the March model. Therefore, the GSH description
is recommended for the preferred orientation correction in
XRD analysis, for both crystal structure refinement and phase
composition analysis.
Figures 2a and 2b depict the variation with pressure of the
preferred orientation r-parameter derived from the Rietveld refinement using the March model, and of the texture index derived from Rietveld refinements using the GSH description. In
the case of an ideal random orientation powder, the texture index is unity. The March r-parameter and the texture index increase linearly as the pressure increases. While the texture
index of the unpressed calcite powder is 1.017, the corresponding value for the uniaxially pressed calcite at 2705 MPa is
1.093. As the uniaxial pressure and therefore the level of
preferred orientation increases, the Rietveld refinements
with the March model and with the GSH description for the
calcite data sets all provide higher March r-parameters and
Fig. 2. Variation in the March r-parameter with uniaxial pressure (left) and texture index with uniaxial pressure (right). Linear regressions are shown for all XRD data
sets. Error bars are smaller than the symbols.
Fig. 3a. The variation between the March preferred orientation corrections with orientation angle derived from Rietveld refinement with the March model.
Fig. 3b. Pole axis distribution plot for {104} calcite XRD data derived from Rietveld refinement with the GSH description.
SPRING 2015
57
texture indices compared with those of unpressed samples.

Figures 3a and 3b show the plots of the March preferred
orientation corrections with an orientation angle derived from
the Rietveld refinement with the March model, and the poleaxis distribution for {104} calcite XRD data derived from the
Rietveld refinement with the GSH description as a function of
the orientation angle, , where is the angle between the
pressing axis and the normal {104} calcite plane. In the case of
an ideal random orientation powder, all the harmonic coefficients are zero, and therefore the general axis distribution is
unity. As expected for the XRD data, the pole-axis distribution
factor for {104} calcite is maximum at = 0 and minimum at
= 90. The pole-axis distribution factor for the unpressed
powders is lower than that for the uniaxially pressed powders,
which indicates that the uniaxially pressed powders have substantial texture.
CONCLUSIONS
The refined structural parameters obtained from the Rietveld
refinement agreed well with the single crystal XRD data results. Additionally, as the uniaxial pressure increases and
therefore the level of preferred orientation increases the refinements for the uniaxially pressed calcite powders all provide
a higher March r-parameter and texture index compared with
those of the unpressed powders. Finally, the GSH description
provides better goodness-of-fit values than the March model.
Therefore, the GSH description is recommended for correction
of the preferred orientation in XRD analysis, for both crystal
structure refinement and phase composition analysis.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Aramco for their support and permission to publish this article. Also, Yazeed A. Al-Dukhayyil, Abdullah M. Al-Ghamdi,
Mansour A. Shafei and Ali Abadi are acknowledged for their
help in the study.
REFERENCES
1. Sitepu, H.: Assessment of Preferred Orientation with
Neutron Powder Diffraction Data, Journal of Applied
Crystallography, Vol. 35, No. 2, April 2002, pp. 274-277.
2. Sitepu, H., OConnor, B.H. and Li, D.: Comparative
Evaluation of the March and Generalized Spherical
Harmonic Preferred Orientation Models Using X-ray
Diffraction Data for Molybdite and Calcite Powders,
Journal of Applied Crystallography, Vol. 38, No. 1,
February 2005, pp. 158-167.
3. Sitepu, H.: Texture and Structural Refinement Using
Neutron Diffraction Data from Molybdite (MoO3) and
Calcite (CaCO3) Powders and a Ni-rich Ni50.7Ti49.30
58
SPRING 2015
Alloy, Powder Diffraction, Vol. 24, No. 4, December

2009, pp. 315-326.
4. Klug, H.P. and Alexander, L.E.: X-ray Diffraction
Procedures for Polycrystalline and Amorphous Materials,
John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1974, 992 p.
5. Dollase, W.A.: Correction of Intensities for Preferred
Orientation in Powder Diffractometry: Application of the
March Model, Journal of Applied Crystallography, Vol.
19, No. 4, August 1986, pp. 267-272.
6. OConnor, B.H., Li, D.Y. and Sitepu, H.: Strategies for
Preferred Orientation Corrections in X-ray Powder
Diffraction Using Line Intensity Ratios, Advances in Xray Analysis, Vol. 34, 1991, pp. 409-415.
7. OConnor, B.H., Li, D.Y. and Sitepu, H.: Texture
Characterization in X-ray Powder Diffraction Using the
March Formula, Advances in X-ray Analysis, Vol. 35,
1992, pp. 277-283.
8. Sitepu, H., Prask, H.J. and Vaudin, M.D.: Texture
Characterization in X-ray and Neutron Powder Diffraction
Data Using the Generalized Spherical Harmonic,
Advances in X-ray Analysis, Vol. 44, 2001, pp. 241-246.
9. Sitepu, H.: Structural Refinement of Neutron Powder
Diffraction Data of Two-stage Martensitic Phase
Transformations in Ti50.75Ni47.75Fe1.50 Shape Memory
Alloy, Powder Diffraction, Vol. 22, No. 3, September
2007, pp. 209-318.
10. Sitepu, H.: In Situ Structural and Texture Analyses of
Monoclinic Phase for Polycrystalline Ni-rich
Ti49.86Ni50.14 Alloy from Neutron Diffraction Data,
Powder Diffraction, Vol. 23, No. 1, March 2008, pp. 35-40.
11. Larson, A.C. and von Dreele, R.B.: General Structure
Analysis System (GSAS), Report LAUR 86-748, Los
Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico,
2000.
12. March, A.: Mathematische Theorie der Regelung Nach
der Korngestalt bei Affiner Deformation, Z. Kristallogr.,
Vol. 81, 1932, pp. 285-297.
13. Bunge, H.J.: Texture Analysis in Materials Science:
Mathematical Methods, Butterworths-Heinemann,
London, 1982, 593 p.
14. Popa, N.C.: Texture in Rietveld Refinement, Journal of
Applied Crystallography, Vol. 25, 1992, pp. 611-616.
15. von Dreele, R.B.: Quantitative Texture Analysis by
Rietveld Refinement, Journal of Applied
Crystallography. Vol. 30, No. 4, August 1997, pp. 517525.
16. Maslen, E.N., Streltsov, V.A., Streltsova, N.R. and
Ishizawa, N.: Electron Density and Optical Anisotropy
in Rhombohedral Carbonates, Part III: Synchrotron X-ray
Studies of CaCO3, MgCO3 and MnCO3, Acta
Crystallographica Section B, Vol. B51, December 1995,

pp. 929-939.
17. Stephens, P.W.: Phenomenological Model of Anisotropic
Peak Broadening in Powder Diffraction, Journal of
Applied Crystallography, Vol. 32, No. 2, April 1999, pp.
281-289.
18. Sitepu, H.: Use of the Rietveld Method for Describing
Structure and Texture in XRD Data of Dolomite
[CaMg(CO3)2] and Hydromagnesite
[Mg5(CO3)4(OH)2(H2O)4] Powders, Advances in Xray Analysis, Vol. 56, 2013, pp. 137-145.
BIOGRAPHIES
Dr. Husin Sitepu joined Saudi
Aramcos Research and Development
Center (R&DC), Technical Services
Division, in late December 2008. Since
then, he has contributed to several
research projects by providing crystallographic information file (CIF) on
synthesized nano-materials and catalysts. Before joining
Saudi Aramco, Husin worked at the well-established
national and international laboratories at the National
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Center for
Neutron Research in Gaithersburg, MD; at the Institut
Laue-Langevin (ILL), which is an international research
center based in Grenoble, France; at the Virginia
Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech) in
Blacksburg, VA; at Ruhr-Universitt Bochum in Bochum,
Germany; at the University of British Columbia in
Vancouver, Canada; and at the Curtin University in Perth,
Australia.
Since 1989, he has published 38 papers in several peerreviewed physics journals, including the International
Union of Crystallographys Journal of Applied
Crystallography, with the Herfindahl index of 9; published
six lightly reveiwed papers in the Saudi Aramco Journal of
Technology and presented 76 papers at various
conferences. Husin has a very strong background in physics
at a research level, and he is an expert in crystallography
preferred orientation and diffraction science through his
extensive experience in Rietveld refinement of polycrystalline
structures using powder X-ray, synchrotron and neutron
diffraction data.
He received his Postgraduate Diploma, M.S. by research
and Ph.D. degrees in Physics from the Curtin University,
Perth, Western Australia, in 1989, 1991 and 1998,
respectively.
Husin is a member of the International Center for
Diffraction Data (ICDD), the International Union of
Crystallography (IUCr) and the Neutron Scattering Society
of America (NSSA).
Dr. Syed R. Zaidi has been with Saudi

Aramco since 1992. His specialized
area of research is the mineralogical
characterization of geological samples
(clay and bulk rock) by using the XRD
technique. Syed is also responsible for
XRD method development and
research work. He is familiar with other analytical
techniques, such as XRF, SEM, FTIR, TGA, DSC and ICP.
Syed received his B.S. degree (with honors) and M.S.
degree, both in Chemistry, from Aligarh Muslim University,
Aligarh, India, in 1977 and 1980, respectively. In 1986, he
received his Ph.D. degree in Inorganic Chemistry from
Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India.
Syed has published more than 20 papers in peerreviewed journals. He is a member of the American
Chemical Society (ACS) and the Society of Petroleum
Engineers (SPE).
Dr. Shouwen Shen is a Science
Specialist in the Advanced Analysis
Unit of the Research & Development
Center (R&DC) at Saudi Aramco.
Before joining Saudi Aramco in 2006,
he worked at Southwest Petroleum
University in China as an Associate
Professor, at the University of Miami as a Visiting Scientist
and at Core Laboratories Canada Ltd. as an X-ray
Specialist.
He studied the seismic facies, sedimentary facies and
sequence stratigraphy of Jurassic formations in the TurpanHami basin of China. Shouwen used piezoelectric
transducers to measure the sonic velocity of various
dolomites from the Madison formation of Wyoming and
Montana, and he developed an empirical formula to
predict the sonic velocity of dolomite according to thin
section description. He also developed new XRD methods
in-house for quantitative mineral analysis of sandstone and
successfully solved the problem caused by the Rietveld
method limitation. Shouwens specialties include sequence
stratigraphy, clastics diagenesis, clay mineralogy and
formation damage assessment, thin section description,
XRF elemental analysis, XRD phase identification and
quantification, crystallite size determination, texture and
residual stress analyses.
Shouwen received a B.S. degree from the China
University of Geosciences, Beijing, China, in 1982 and a
Ph.D. degree in Petroleum Geology from Chengdu
University of Technology, Sichuan, China, in 1998.
SPRING 2015
59
A Novel Semi-Analytical Solution for

Transient Pressure Data Interpretation
of a Fractured Well in an Asymmetric
Reservoir
Authors: Faisal M. Al-Thawad and Dr. Mahmoud Jamiolahmady
ABSTRACT
certainty, leading to long-term benefits and greater additional

business.
The presence of fractures and faults plays a significant role in

the recovery and performance of tight reservoirs exploited
with hydraulically fractured wells. Faulting may result in
asymmetric reservoirs, i.e., different quality reservoirs across
the fault plane, due to the displacement of reservoir blocks
along the fault plane. Typically, numerical well test packages
are used to match the pressure responses of such complex geology and well geometry. The limitations of such approaches in
terms of ease of use and the wide range of possible solutions
plead for a more attractive approach. Therefore, a semi-analytical approach has been taken to develop a new practical and
efficient flow solution for a well intersected by a finite conductivity vertical fracture in an asymmetric reservoir. The solution
is characterized mainly by the bilinear flow resulting from the
formation and fracture linear flows. The shape of the derivative
plot suggests a bilinear flow and quarter slope, addressing the
fracture characteristics, followed by a radial flow and zero
slope, articulating the quality of the two reservoirs. Type curves
of dimensionless time and pressure are presented along with
field cases for vertical and horizontal wells intersected by natural fractures or exploited by hydraulic fractures. The results of
this article will enable reservoir engineers to carry out modeling of such complex reservoir/well scenarios with increasing
Fig. 1. A fault that has juxtaposed different geology across the fault plane.
60
SPRING 2015
INTRODUCTION
Ramey (1976)1 and Raghavan (1977)2 have previously presented a review of the work done on radial flow along and
toward fractures. They find that intersecting fractures will
strongly affect the transient flow behavior of the well. Houze
et al. (1988)3 have described a well intersecting an infinite conductivity fracture in a naturally fractured reservoir that was
simulated using a double-porosity model. Cinco-Ley and
Samaniego (1981)4 have presented a semi-analytical solution
to conducting a transient pressure analysis for fractured wells
in symmetric reservoirs, which is most likely to occur in the
case of small fractures or strike-slip faults. Yet, in the case of
reverse or normal faulting with a large throw (juxtaposing),
different quality reservoirs would adjoin the fault plane. That
is, faulting may result in a sudden displacement of rock along
the fault planes, which can lead to a large-scale slippage, resulting in different quality fault blocks on both sides of the
fault. Production logs have shown the presence of two different
fault blocks after a reverse fault offset the sequence of two zones.
Figure 1 offers a good example of faulting that juxtaposes different geology across the fault plane. Data interpretation is
more complex when two different quality zones are aligned

through the fault plane. There is a semi-analytical solution for
such a scenario.
Numerical well test packages are limited and are largely affected by grid geometries and sizes, especially when analyzing
wells with complex geometry or geological settings. Analytical
solutions, on the other hand, can enable the well test analyst to
carry out modeling of complex reservoir/well scenarios more
easily and with increasing certainty. In this study, a mathematical model was developed for a well intersecting a natural fracture (or hydraulic fracture) in a linear composite reservoir,
where the fracture (and intersecting well) is located between
the two different permeability regions. The solution provided
can handle different fracture/reservoir complexities, including
radial homogeneous reservoirs, fractured wells in a homogeneous reservoir and fractured wells between two regions with
different properties.
PROBLEM STATEMENT AND SOLUTION

DEVELOPMENT
As previously mentioned, this investigation provides a semi-analytical solution to a finite conductivity fracture separating
two regions of different mobilities. Figure 2 shows the flow
geometry that was investigated. The flow domain of the statement problem has been divided into three flow regions: (1) a
reservoir region-1 (with its specific properties) that defines flow
into the fracture from below; (2) a fracture (with its specific
fracture properties) that allows fluids to flow along the fracture
toward the well; and (3) a reservoir region-2 (with its specific
properties) that defines the fluid flow into the fracture from the
top. The flow per unit area was defined as positive from above
and negative from below. It should be noted that our goal was
to develop a solution that provides the pressure vs. time and
space in general and wellbore pressure vs. time in particular.
Laplace and Fourier transforms were performed to the three
equations governing the 2D flow in these three regions with
respect to dimensionless time, in terms of the transformed parameter, s, and space variable, and in terms of the transformed
parameter, p, respectively. The equations with the associated
boundary conditions are presented in the Laplace space
and inverted numerically using the Gaver-Stehfest numerical
inversion5. For more details, please contact the authors.

The resultant expression for the wellbore pressure in the
Laplace domain is:

where

(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2) (2)
(2)
(2)

and Df, D1 and D2 are the dimensionless hydraulic diffu

(2)

region-1
and

sivities of the fracture,
region-2,
respectively:
( (2)

(6)

(6)

(6)
(6)

(6)

(6)

conductivity:
FCDf is the dimensionless fracture

(
(
(
(2)
( (2)
(3)
(
(
(4)
(
(
((
(
(
(

(5)
(
(
(
(6)

(

The
fractures reference
is the arithmetic aver
( (permeability

(

age of
(6) the well is located in the
the two adjoining( regions
(6)

center between
the two regions:

(

regions

The

(
(6)
(
( (6)
( ( (
(
(
reference(( permeability
is:
((
(
(
( ( (
((
(
( (
(7)
(8)

((
and kd1
k are the dimensionless
permeabilities for re(
and
d2
(
region-2,

gion-1 and
respectively:

(

(9)
((
(
((
(10)
The reservoir parameters that can be determined from the

type curve matching of the forwarded solution are reservoir
permeabilities, k1 and k2, fracture permeability, kf, fracture
width, wf, dimensional fracture conductivity, kf wf, and dimensionless fracture conductivity, FCDf. The fracture halflength, xf, can also be estimated by estimating the flux
distribution. The finite conductivity fracture dictates a nonuniform inflow flux distribution along the fracture plane.
SOLUTION BEHAVIOR
Fig. 2. A schematic of the flow geometry under study.
The type curve solution of dimensionless pressure and its log

derivative vs. dimensionless time for different dimensionless
SPRING 2015
61
((
(
(
((
fracture conductivities has been plotted in Fig. 3. It shows

some distinctive features, including a homogeneous infinite
acting reservoir when the fracture conductivity is zero, and
fractured well pressure behavior in early-time data, where the
curve signifies a one-quarter slope, which generates a bilinear
flow reflecting two linear flow regimes along and into the fracture. The solution code is enabled with dimensionless skin and
wellbore storage (WBS) using dimensionless equations and
those limited to positive skin6 only, Fig. 4.
Flux Distribution
The nature of finite conductivity fractures dictates a nonuniform inflow flux distribution. The flux distribution alongside
the fracture plane is nonuniform because the fracture pressure,
Pf, is considerably smaller closer to the well and gets larger at
the tip of the fracture due to the larger volume around the tip
area, thereby yielding a nonuniformly distributed flux. It is
also worth mentioning that the larger fluid volume around the
tip will also cause larger inflow flux there. It has been observed7 that producing fractured wells at high flow rates will
cause non-Darcy effects in the fracture, resulting in a pessimistic estimate of fracture conductivity, and will also cause
different flux distribution. The same assumption is valid for

cases featuring highly propped fractures and a damaged fracture face. As a result of estimating the flux distribution, the
fracture half-length can also be estimated.
VALIDATION OF SOLUTION
Synthetic Case 1: Fractured Well Bounded by Two
Different Regions
Analysis of a synthetic case of a fractured well in an asymmetric reservoir was carried out for this study, where region-1 and
region-2 permeabilities were 20 md and 80 md, respectively,
and the average permeability calculated from this solution was
the arithmetic average, or 50 md. This case was compared to
another case that of a well located in a homogeneous reservoir with an average reservoir permeability of 50 md. By superimposing the two pressure derivatives of these cases, a
perfect overlay was achieved through the late-time data of the
radial flow, confirming the reliability of the average permeability calculation method proposed by this solution, Fig. 5. This
was anticipated as the well described in the proposed solution
is located in the center between the two regions.
Synthetic Case 2: Analytical Data from a Commercial
Software Package
Fig. 3. Dimensionless time vs. dimensionless pressure and pressure derivative using
numerical inversion from the Laplace transform.
Fig. 4. Dimensionless time vs. dimensionless pressure and pressure derivative with
WBS using dimensionless equations6.
62
SPRING 2015
A synthetic, analytically built symmetric reservoir model of a

well intersecting a finite conductivity fracture was constructed
to validate the proposed semi-analytical solution using a commercial well test package. Table 1 shows the input data to the
analytical model and the results obtained by superimposing the
pressure data of this solution on the proposed type curve, Fig.
6. A good agreement between the two was noted. There is a
slight deviation in the match between dimensionless time, tD,
of 1.0e5 to 1.0e8, which is attributed to the infinite fracture
half-length concept of this study.
Fig. 5. Derivative overlay of a vertical well in a homogeneous reservoir and a

fractured well in an asymmetric reservoir where both reservoirs have the same
average permeability of 50 md.
Analytical Model
xf (ft)
This Solution
Fcf (md-ft)
kn (md)
xf (ft)
Fcf (md-ft)
k1 (md)
k2 (md)
8e4
33
Not
Estimated
8e4
33
33
2,000
Remarks
The match to the synthetic
model is fair.
Table 1. Comparison between an analytical model and the proposed solution
Numerical Model
This Solution
xf (ft)
Fcf (md-ft)
kn (md)
xf (ft)
Fcf (md-ft)
2,000
1.32e6
33
Not Estimated
1.32e6
Remarks
k1 (md)
k2 (md)
13
53
kav = 33 md
Numerical data is affected by the

grids.
Table 2. Comparison between a numerical model and the proposed solution
Fig. 6. Pressure and derivative match between the proposed solution and synthetic
analytical model.
Fig. 7. Pressure and derivative match between the proposed solution and synthetic
numerical model.
Synthetic Case 3: Numerical Data from a Commercial

Software Package
Field Case 1: A Fractured Vertical Well in a Sandstone

Reservoir
A synthetic, numerically built asymmetric reservoir model of a

well intersecting a finite conductivity fracture was constructed
to validate the proposed semi-analytical solution using a commercial well test package. The two regions permeabilities were
13 md and 53 md, respectively, where the arithmetic average
of both regions was 33 md. Table 2 shows the input data to
the numerical model and the results obtained by superimposing
the pressure data of this solution on the proposed type curve,
Fig. 7. A good agreement between the two was noted. Table 2
also shows the results of the proposed solution and a total
agreement between the two models. As before, the slight deviation in the match, between the tD of 1.0e7 to 1.0e10, is attributed to the infinite fracture half-length concept of this study.
The first field case considered was a vertical well intersecting a

finite conductivity fracture in a sandstone reservoir, selected to
evaluate the reliability of our solution for a practical field example where the flow is partially dominated by the fracture
bilinear flow regime and followed by a radial flow regime. A
fracture skin and WBS flow regimes were also evident from the
early-time data. Table 3 summarizes well and reservoir properties.
The data was matched to the curve provided by the new
FIELD CASES
Field data for an asymmetric reservoir case was not available,
yet considering that the model matches the numerically built
asymmetric case, it is expected that the proposed solutions applicability can be extended to field cases of asymmetric reservoirs.
Property
Wellbore Radius (ft)
Value
0.23
Pay Zone (ft)
100.0
Porosity (%)
19.0%
Formation Volume Factor (bbl/STB)
1.39
Viscosity (cp)
0.35
Total Compressibility (psi1)
7.17e-6
Table 3. Field Case 1 well and reservoir properties
SPRING 2015
63
solution, Fig. 8, and validated4, Fig. 9, using a commercial

software package. The flow capacity to oil was found to be
nearly the same, 2,400 md-ft from the proposed solution and
2,500 md-ft from the validation solution4, and fracture conductivities were identical, Table 4.
Field Case 2: A Fractured Horizontal Well in a Carbonate

Reservoir
A field case of a horizontal well intersecting a finite conductivity fracture in a carbonate reservoir was considered to evaluate
the reliability of our solution for a practical field example
where the flow is completely dominated by the fracture. The
early-time data was acquired from the productivity index test
and a horizontal section drilled in the top, which has been
slightly distorted due to WBS and phase segregation. Table 5
summarizes the well and reservoir properties.
The flow capacity to oil was found to be 26,600 md-ft. The
proposed solution was used to match the pressure data, and
the results were compared to the solution4 for a well intersecting a finite conductivity fracture in a symmetrical reservoir.
This shows that the solution, which was developed for more
complex geological systems (two regions), can handle a simple
system as well. As clearly shown in Table 6, the consistency of
the proposed solution was confirmed over the estimated reservoir parameters, which were in excellent agreement. The parameters were found to be identical in both solutions for a
symmetric reservoir case. The data was matched to the curve
provided by the new solution, Fig. 10, and validated by the
solution4, Fig. 11, using a commercial software package.
Fig. 8. Pressure and derivative match between the proposed solution and Field
Case 1.
Property
Value
Wellbore Radius (ft)
0.26
Pay Zone (ft)
140.0
Porosity (%)
15.0
Formation Volume Factor (bbl/STB)
1.39
Viscosity (cp)
0.73
Total Compressibility (psi )
7.8e-6
Fig. 9. Validation of pressure and derivative match with Field Case 1 using CincoLey and Samaniegos solution4.
Cinco-Ley and Samaniegos Solution4
Table 5. Field Case 2 well and reservoir properties
This Solution
xf (ft)
Fcf (md-ft)
FCDf
k (md)
xf (ft)
Fcf (md-ft)
FCDf
240
12.6e3
2.0
25
Not
Estimated
12.6e3
2.0
Remarks
k1 (md)
28
k2 (md)
20
kav = 24 md
Numerical data is
affected by the grids.
Table 4. Comparison between the proposed solution and commercial software results for Field Case 1
Cinco-Ley and Samaniegos Solution4

xf (ft)
240
FCf(md-ft)
58.4e3
FCDf
1.0
k (md)
190
This Solution
xf (ft)
Not Estimated
Fcf (md-ft)
58.4e3
FCDf
1.0
Table 6. Comparison between the proposed solution and commercial software results for Field Case 2
64
SPRING 2015
Remarks
k1 (md)
k2 (md)
190
190
kav = 190 md
Numerical data
is affected by the
grids.
The solution was validated by analytical and numerical

models and led to identical results.
The solution estimates the fractures conductivity and
width, and the flow capacity of both regions bounding
the fracture.
The solution calculates the arithmetic average
permeabilities of the two regions bounding the fracture
plane.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Fig. 10. Pressure and derivative match between the proposed solution and Field
Case 2.

Aramco and Heriot-Watt University for their support and permission to publish this article. Also, the authors would like to
express their appreciation for the support and fruitful discussions they had with Dr. N.M. Anisur Rahman and Hassan
Nooruddin.
This article was presented at the SPE International Petroleum Technology Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia,
December 10-12, 2014.
NOMENCLATURE
Fig. 11. Variation of pressure and derivative match with Field Case 2 using CincoLey and Samaniegos solution4.
CONCLUSIONS
The reliability of the proposed solution was demonstrated by
matches with data from three synthetic cases and two field
cases. First, after a perfect comparison of the proposed solution for a synthetic case in an asymmetric reservoir with data
from a well in a homogeneous reservoir with the same average
reservoir permeability, analytically and numerically built models were constructed of the simulated flow geometry, and the
models pressure data behavior displayed an excellent agreement with the type curves of the proposed solution. The estimated reservoir parameters from the type curves were also
confirmed to be in good agreement with input data. Second,
confirmation was achieved through comparisons with two
field cases of vertical and horizontal wells that intersected natural fractures in a sandstone and carbonate reservoir, respectively. In conclusion, we note the following:
A new semi-analytical solution has been developed to
handle a finite conductivity fracture in symmetric and
asymmetric reservoirs two different regions bounding
the fracture plane.
a
B
C
cf
ct
dF
df
FCDf
FCf
h
k
k1
k2
kf
kd1
kd2
kdf
kf .wf
kr
kn
Pi
P1
P2
Pf
Pwf
Pd
Pd1
Pd2
Pdf
distance from origin, ft

formation volume factor, RB/STB
wellbore storage, bbl/psi
formation compressibility, psi1
total compressibility, psi1
distance to fault, ft
distance to fracture, ft
dimensionless fracture conductivity
dimensional fracture conductivity, md-ft
formation thickness, ft
matrix permeability, md
fracture permeability, md
fracture conductivity, md-ft
reference permeability, md
(n) reservoir permeability, md
initial formation pressure, psi
region-1 pressure, psi
region-2 pressure, psi
fracture pressure, psi
flowing BHP, psi
dimensionless pressure
dimensionless region-1 pressure
dimensionless region-2 pressure
dimensionless fracture pressure
SPRING 2015
65
Pdwf
_
p
=
p
q
rw
r
S
s
tD
tDf
wf
xf
xd
yd
p
t

Df
D1
D2
dimensionless fracture pressure

pressure in Laplace domain
pressure in Fourier domain
flow rate at surface, STB/D
wellbore radius, ft
distance from the center of wellbore, ft
skin factor, dimensionless
Laplace parameter
dimensionless time
fracture dimensionless time
fracture width, ft
fracture half-length, ft
dimensionless x-coordinates
dimensionless y-coordinates
pressure change since start of transient test, psi
time elapsed since start of test, hours
0.0002637 k/ ct, hydraulic diffusivity, ft2/hr
fracture hydraulic diffusivity, dimensionless
region-1 hydraulic diffusivity, dimensionless
region-2 hydraulic diffusivity, dimensionless
viscosity, cp
porosity, fraction
Fourier parameter
SUBSCRIPT
= conductivity
= dimensionless
= fault
= fracture
= wellbore
C
D
F
f
w
REFERENCES
1. Ramey Jr., H.J.: Practical Use of Modern Well Test
Analysis, SPE paper 5878, presented at the SPE California
Regional Meeting, Long Beach, California, April 8-9,
1976.
2. Raghavan, R.: Pressure Behavior of Wells Intercepting
Fractures, Proceedings of the Invitational Well Testing
Symposium, Berkeley, California, October 19-21, 1977.
3. Houze, O.P., Horne, R.N. and Ramey Jr., H.J.: Pressure
Transient Response of an Infinite Conductivity Vertical
Fracture in a Reservoir with Double Porosity Behavior,
SPE Formation Evaluation, Vol. 3, No. 3, September 1988,
pp. 510-518.
4. Cinco-Ley, H. and Samaniego, F.: Transient Pressure
Analysis for Fractured Wells, Journal of Petroleum
Technology, Vol. 33, No. 9, September 1981, pp. 17491766.
5. Villinger, H.: Solving Cylindrical Geothermal Problems
Using Gaver-Stehfest Inverse Laplace Transform,
Geophysics, Vol. 50, No. 10, October 1985, pp. 1581-1587.
66
SPRING 2015
6. Kucuk, F. and Ayestaran, L.: Analysis of Simultaneously

Measured Pressure and Sandface Flow Rate in Transient
Well Testing, Journal of Petroleum Technology, Vol. 37,
No. 2, February 1985, pp. 323-334.
7. Guppy, K.H., Cinco-Ley, H., Ramey Jr., H.J. and
Samaniego, F.: Non-Darcy Flow in Wells with Finite
Conductivity Vertical Fractures, Society of Petroleum
Engineers Journal, Vol. 22, No. 5, October 1982, pp. 681698.
BIOGRAPHIES
Faisal M. Al-Thawad is a General
Supervisor of the Well Testing Division
and a senior consultant in pressure
transient analysis with Saudi Aramcos
Reservoir Description and Simulation
Department. He has extensive
experience in exploratory testing
operations and supervision and is specialized in complex
well tests, including modeling faults and fractures, and
multilateral wells. Faisal has nearly 25 years of total
experience in various petroleum disciplines, including
drilling, reservoir management and simulation. His
experience includes the completion of a 6-year Specialist
Development Program on Reservoir Testing/New
Technologies with a focus on fractures identification,
characterizing and modeling.
Faisal is a member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers
(SPE) and has participated in a number of international
conferences. He has authored several technical papers in
the field of well testing and pressure transient analysis.
Faisal was an SPE Distinguished Lecturer during the
2013/2014 cycle with a lecture entitled Fractures
Network; Reservoirs Friend or Foe?
Faisal received his B.S. degree in Petroleum Engineering
(KFUPM), Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, and his M.S. degree in
Petroleum Engineering from Heriot-Watt University,
Edinburgh, U.K.
Dr. Mahmoud Jamiolahmady is a
Professor of Petroleum Engineering at
Heriot-Watt University, a fellow
member of the U.K. Higher Education
Academy and Technical Director of
Petroc Technologies Ltd. He has over
25 years of experience in studying
fluid flow in porous media at the pore, core and field scale
levels. Mahmoud leads the Heriot-Watt University gas and
gas condensate research team. He also delivers a number of
industry-based continuing professional development courses,
including Gas Condensate Reservoir Engineering, and is
involved in a number of other enhanced oil recovery projects.
Mahmoud has supervised over 100 M.S. and Ph.D.
research projects. He has coauthored over 100 papers
relevant to the petroleum industry.
Use of Nano-Emulsion Surfactants during

Hydraulic Fracturing Treatments
Authors: Mashhoor S. Al-Anazi, Dr. Mohammed H. Al-Khaldi, Alhasan B. Fuseni and Khalid M. Al-Marshad
ABSTRACT
Hydraulic fracturing has been extensively used as an efficient
method to enhance hydrocarbon production, especially in tight
formations; however, this technique has been associated with
long-lasting formation damage and is a challenge due to fracturing fluid filtrate leakoff. According to the Laplace equation,
this fluid leakoff results in a phenomenon called water blockage
due to capillary forces. Recent studies have shown that surfactants can be used as an additive to fracturing fluids and that
they will reduce the pressure required to displace the injected
fracturing fluids. This study investigated the performance of
two new nano-emulsion surfactants (NESs).
NES mixtures were prepared at different concentrations
ranging from 0.5 gallons per 1,000 gallons (gpt) to 5 gpt using
field mixing water. Mixing water and representative field condensate samples were tested for both surface tension and contact angle at a temperature range of 77 F to 325 F. The
Laplace equation was used to calculate capillary pressure (Pc)
values based on those surface tension and contact angle values.
The results based on this study have demonstrated the effectiveness of NESs to recover the fracturing fluid filtrate during
flow back. The performance of these surfactants was investigated as a function of several parameters, such as surfactant
concentration, soaking time and temperature. In addition, this
article explores the adsorption behavior of these surfactants on
formation rock and the effect of NESs on the rock wettability.
Optimal design parameters for using these NESs to achieve significant enhancement in injected fracturing fluid recovery are
also discussed.
INTRODUCTION
Among other important sources of damage, water trapping
(water blockage) around the critical near wellbore area has
been one of the main causes of the formation damage that occurs during different field activities, such as drilling, completion
and stimulation. This phenomenon has an especially significant
impact during fracturing treatments of water-wet tight gas
wells: it is considered one of the main long-lasting challenges,
given that more than 70% of injected water-based fracturing
fluid is lost, remaining in the near vicinity of the created
fracture1-8. This fracturing fluid filtrate loss accumulates as a

ring of high water saturation around the fracture where it acts
as a barrier to gas flow. As a result, the effective gas permeability is significantly reduced, and subsequently, the well productivity decreases. The effect of water blockage on gas well
productivity is even more pronounced in gas wells with a reservoir pressure below the dew point pressure. This is mainly because the presence of condensate, in addition to the trapped
water, results in further reduction of effective gas permeability,
and therefore, has a dramatic negative impact on well productivity. Over the last few decades, many techniques and methods have been used to enhance the cleanup process to remove
entrapped fluid in gas wells9-13.
Approaches to water blockage and its cleanup are mainly
governed by the interaction of both capillary pressure (Pc) and
relative permeability. Pc is a function of pore geometry, the interfacial tension of entrapped and produced fluids, and rock
wettability14 as follows:

(1)
where is the interfacial tension of entrapped and produced

fluids in dyne/centimeters (cm), is the contact angle in degrees,
and R is pore radius in cm.
The reservoir drawdown pressure must first overcome the
Pc for produced gas to displace entrapped water. Subsequently,
effective gas permeability will increase with further gas production due to the evaporation of the entrapped fluid. According to
Mcleod and Coulter (1966)12, application of alcohol treatments,
such as methanol and isopropyl alcohol, improves the entrapped
fluid displacement by lowering the interfacial tension and enhancing the water evaporation rate. It has been reported11, however, that the evaporation process of entrapped water can last
for thousands of pore volumes of produced gas. This unhurried
evaporation process is even slower in tight and strong water-wet
formations. The report suggested that the cleanup of entrapped
water can be improved by increasing pressure drawdown, increasing temperature, changing the wettability of the rock to a
more gas-wet condition, and decreasing the interfacial tension
of entrapped and produced fluids. When used to facilitate the last
action, surface active chemicals (surfactants) have improved
post-fracturing fluid recovery, especially in tight formations.
SPRING 2015
67
Surfactants have been extensively used in different field

activities. Their applications have a wide range: they have been
added as acid retarders, emulsifiers, demulsifiers, anti-sludge
agents and acid diverters15-18. In addition to these applications,
surfactants have also been used as an additive to reduce the interfacial tension of fluid filtrate and reservoir produced fluids.
The use of surfactants in tight formations is essential because
the effect of capillary forces is more pronounced in small pore
throat formations14. Generally, a typical surfactant is an amphiphilic molecule composed of a hydrophilic head and a
hydrophobic tail. Typically, the head group is composed of
ethylene oxide, acting as a hydrophile agent. When dissolved
in water near their critical micelle concentration (CMC), surfactant molecules aggregate into self-assembly orientations,
creating cylindrical or spherical micelles, thereby reducing the
surface tension of any injected fluid. These surfactants are classified according to either the charge they acquire when dissolved in water or the charge of the head group. There are
mainly four types of surfactants: cationic, anionic, nonionic
and amphoteric (zwitterionic).
Besides its concentration, other factors affect surfactant performance. One of these factors is temperature19-22. At high
temperatures, the hydration bonds between water molecules
and the polyethylene oxide group start to break. As a result,
the surfactant solubility limit, or its cloud point, decreases and
the surfactant starts to precipitate. This precipitation forms
two immiscible phases: a surfactant-rich phase and a surfactant-lean phase. Additionally, it has been reported that different salts have a negative effect on surfactant solubility21. The
calcium chloride and magnesium chloride salts depress the
cloud point of a surfactant and cause a phase separation. Although these surfactants have been extensively used to prevent
water blockage, the surfactant adsorption problems in both
carbonate and sandstone formations have been detrimental to
their performance19, 20, 23, 24.
In this article, nano-emulsion surfactants (NESs) are explored as an alternative to conventional surfactants to overcome
the challenges posed by the adsorption problems. These surfactants are a blend of anionic surfactant, nonionic surfactant,
short chain alcohol and water. The presence of both surfactant
and alcohol has a dual effect: it both lowers interfacial tension
and also increases water evaporation. This combination outperforms water blockage treatments using surfactants or alcohol
alone. NESs are thermodynamically stable and homogeneous
dispersions of two immiscible fluids, stabilized by a surfactant
and a co-surfactant of short chain alcohol. The diameter size
of these stabilized emulsions is approximately 10 nm to 20
nm. Generally, these emulsions can be classified as one of four
types: WINSOR I, WINSOR II, WINSOR III and WINSOR
IV. WINSOR I, WINSOR II and WINSOR III are systems consisting of a nano-emulsion phase in equilibrium with oil, water
and oil/water phases, respectively. WINSOR IV is a system
consisting of the nano-emulsion phase only25.
This study assessed the performance of two NESs, NES-1
68
SPRING 2015
and NES-2. The effectiveness of these two surfactants in lowering

the interfacial tension was investigated under various conditions
expected in both gas and gas condensate reservoirs. Additionally, the effect of the use of these surfactants on formation rock
wettability was studied along with their adsorption behavior.
EXPERIMENTAL WORK
Materials
Two NESs, NES-1 and NES-2, were received from local service
companies; they were used as received. Both NES-1 and NES-2
are blends of anionic surfactant, nonionic surfactant, short
chain alcohol and water. NES-1 is a light amber liquid that
consists of oil and isopropanol with a pH of 6.7. NES-2 is
clear colorless liquid that consists mainly of citrus and isopropanol with a pH of 8.7. These two surfactants were dispersed in two different formation waters at a concentration
range of 0.5 gallons per 1,000 gallons (gpt) to 5 gpt. Tables 1
and 2 show the geochemical analysis of the two formation waters. Formation rock substrates were used to take contact angle measurements at different nano-emulsion concentrations.
Table 3 illustrates the mineral composition of the formation
rocks used.
Contact Angle and Interfacial Tension (Drop Shape
Analysis)
The contact angle and interfacial tension measurements were

made at temperature ranges of 77 F to 325 F, under pressure
of 1,500 psi. These measurements were made using a pendant
drop instrument, model PD-E700LL-H, manufactured by Eurotechnica Ingenieurbro GmbH, Germany. The image analysis module of the instrument is a Krss model DSA100HP. The
wetted surfaces of the instrument (the cell and needle) are constructed from Hastelloy-C. Surface tension measurements were
Ion
Content (Unit)
HCO3-
209 mg/L
Cl
< 10 mg/L
Conductivity
2,909 Microhms
pH at 25 C
8.0
TDS
1,445 mg/L
Specific Gravity at 60 F
1.0010
SO4
2-
670 mg/L
2+
160 mg/L
Sr2+
16 mg/L
18 mg/L
Mg
82 mg/L
Ca
2+
Na
314 mg/L
Table 1. Chemical composition of formation water used as mixing water for NES-1
Ion
Content (Unit)
HCO3-
147 mg/L
Cl
302 mg/L
Conductivity
1,564 Microhms
pH at 25 C
7.9
TDS
1,042 mg/L
Specific Gravity at 60 F
1.0004
SO4
2-
276 mg/L
2+
115 mg/L
Ca
Sr2+
8 mg/L
< 10 mg/L
Mg
2+
Na
49 mg/L
153 mg/L
Table 2. Chemical composition of formation water used as mixing water for NES-2
Mineral
Weight Percentage (wt%)
Calcite-CaCO3
86
Dolomite-CaMg(CO3)2
Quartz-SiO2
Pyrite-FeS2
Kaolinite-Al2Si2O5(OH)4
Illite-KAl2(Si3Al)O10(OH)2
Then the slurry of NES solutions and crushed core samples

was filtered using 0.5 m paper. To assess the degree of adsorption for each NES, interfacial tension values of the NES
fluids at CMC were compared before and after the adsorption
experiments.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

Interfacial Tension
Fracturing fluid filtrate leakoff can cause severe formation

damage due to water blockage. According to Eqn. 1, the main
driving force for water blockage is Pc, which is mainly a function of both interfacial tension and contact angle. Several experiments were conducted using two NES solutions to measure
surface tension and interfacial tension at different surfactant
concentrations and at temperature ranges of 77 F to 325 F.
These experiments were conducted in the presence and absence
of a representative condensate field sample.
Figures 1 and 2 show the surface tension (gas-liquid interfacial
Table 3. Mineral composition of the formation rocks used for contact angle
measurements
carried out by generating a pendant drop at the end of a capillary tube outside diameter = 1.575 mm in compressed
nitrogen gas. The DSA100HP was used to determine the contact
angle from the shape of the sessile drops. The instrument provides precise measurements of contact angle and interfacial
tension with a measuring resolution of 0.1 and 0.01 mN/m
for the contact angle and the interfacial tension, respectively.
The maximum operating pressure and temperature are 10,000
psi and 200 C, respectively.
Both contact angle and interfacial tension measurements
were made at different surfactant concentrations of 0.5 gpt to
5 gpt in the presence and absence of condensate liquid to simulate the conditions of both gas and gas condensate wells. Prior
to making the contact angle measurements in the presence of
condensate, the formation rock substrate was soaked in a condensate sample for nearly 24 hours.
Fig. 1. Surface tension of NES-1 as a function of concentration and temperature.
Adsorption Tests
Adsorption tests of each NES were performed at room temperature. These tests were conducted using crushed samples of
representative reservoir rock, which were immersed overnight
in formation water samples containing nano-emulsion fluid at
CMC under vacuum influence at a solid-liquid ratio of 1:1.
Fig. 2. Surface tension of NES-2 as a function of concentration and temperature.
SPRING 2015
69
tension (w/air)) as a function of surfactant concentration and

temperature for NES-1 and NES-2, respectively. As shown in
these figures, the CMC of these two surfactants is nearly 0.5
gpt. The surface tension decreased as both the surfactant concentration and the temperature increased. This decrease in
w/air continued until the surfactant concentration reached a
CMC value of 0.5 gpt and the temperature value was at 250
F. Beyond these two values of surfactant concentration and
temperature, there was no significant decrease in w/air value.
At a concentration of 0.5 gpt and a temperature of 250 F,
the surface tension of NES-1 and NES-2 decreased from nearly
54.3 dyne/cm to nearly 24.62 dyne/cm and 23.54 dyne/cm,
respectively. This reduction represents a drop of almost 54%
and 56% in w/air. At higher temperatures, the percentage of
the reduction in surface tension was not as significant as that
observed at 250 F, Fig. 3. For example, at 325 F, the surface
tension of NES-1 and NES-2 at 0.5 gpt decreased by only
26.6% and 24.80%, respectively. This is attributed mainly to
the fact that water at high temperatures has relatively lower
w/air, which cannot be reduced as significantly as it can be at
lower temperature values.
In gas condensate reservoirs, the fracturing fluid cleanup is
dependent on the interfacial tension between water and condensate rather than water and air. The interfacial tension values
between representative condensate field samples and NES-1
and NES-2 solutions, Figs. 4 and 5, respectively, were determined at various surfactant concentrations and temperature
values. NES-1 and NES-2 were very effective in lowering the
interfacial tension of water against condensate (w/c). The reduction in interfacial tension was a function of both surfactant
concentration and temperature. Generally, w/c increased with
increases in temperature at a constant surfactant concentration. For example, at 0.5 gpt of NES-1, the w/c increased from
28.02 dyne/cm to 56.45 dyne/cm when the temperature was
increased from 77 F to 325 F; however, the w/c decreased
when the surfactant concentration was increased at a constant
temperature. For example, it decreased from 40.9 dyne/cm to
15.94 dyne/cm when the NES-2 concentration was increased
Fig. 3. The reduction percentage in surface tension of NES-1 and NES-2 at 0.5
gpt as a function of temperature at 0.5 gpt.
70
SPRING 2015
Fig. 4. Interfacial tension of NES-1 against condensate as function of

concentration and temperature.
Fig. 5. Interfacial tension of NES-2 against condensate as function of

concentration and temperature.
from 0 gpt to 5 gpt at a constant 325 F. Figure 6 shows the

percentages of reduction in w/c as a function of different NES1 concentrations at different temperatures. It is obvious that at
various temperatures, the most significant decrease in w/c was
observed at a surfactant concentration of almost 1 gpt to 2
gpt. For example, at 250 F, w/c decreased by 67%, 74% and
85% when the NES-1 concentration was increased from 0 gpt
Fig. 6. The percentages of reduction in interfacial tension of NES-1 as a function

of temperature and concentration.
to 0.5 gpt, 1 gpt and above 2 gpt, respectively.

To study the effect of surfactant adsorption on its effectiveness, the w/air values of the NES-1 and NES-2 solutions at
0.5 gpt were calculated before and after the adsorption tests.
These tests were conducted using crushed samples, which were
immersed overnight in formation water samples containing
nano-emulsion fluid at CMC under vacuum influence at a
solid-liquid ratio of 1:1 and 77 F. It was found that the w/air
values of the NES-1 and NES-2 solutions at 0.5 gpt before and
after adsorption tests were equal, at an average of 36 dyne/cm.
This clearly indicates that these two NESs have no tendency to
adsorption on formation rock. Unlike conventional surfactants
during fracturing treatments, these NESs will remain present in
the leading edge of the penetrating fluid rather than being lost in
the few inches of fracture vicinity area. Therefore, compared
to conventional surfactants, fracturing fluid filtrate with NES
will have lower interfacial tension and higher flow back recovery.
toward water decreased and became non-water wet. Subsequently, the experimental procedure was modified so that the
water drop was first placed on the rock substrate, after which
Contact Angle
In addition to interfacial tension, Pc is a function of contact

angle, Eqn. 1. Several experiments were conducted using the
two NES solutions to measure the contact angle at different
surfactant concentrations and a temperature value of 77 F.
These experiments were conducted in the presence and absence
of representative condensate field samples. In all the experiments, water was taken as the reference fluid phase, and the
contact angle was always measured through the water phase
independent of whether water was the wetting phase or not.
Contact angle measurements were made using cube samples
of formation rock. Preliminary experiments investigated the
change in average contact angle with time. It was observed
that the contact angle of 0 gpt NES solutions reached a stable
value after nearly 5 minutes at 77 F and at atmospheric pressure, Photo 1. Therefore, all contact angle measurements were
made after 5 minutes of contact time between a water droplet
and the formation rock substrate. Generally, results showed
that the average contact angle decreased as the NES concentration increased at 77 F, Photo 2 and Fig. 7. For example, the
average contact angle decreased from 55.44 to 9.83 when
the NES-2 concentration was increased from 0 gpt to 2 gpt. It
is clear that the NES interacted with the formation rock, and
as a result the rock became more water-wet. This effect was
not permanent, however; the contact angle at 0 gpt remained
constant at 55 before and after a formation substrate was
soaked in 5 gpt NES solutions for 24 hours at 77 F.
The average contact angle was also measured through water
in the presence of condensate using cube samples of formation
rock. The rock substrates were first immersed in condensate,
and then a drop of NES solution was placed on the top flat
surface of the formation sample. It was observed that the contact angle of the NES drop increased from nearly 55 to 140
at 77 F when condensate was present, Photo 3. It had been
expected that in the presence of condensate, the rock affinity
Photo 1. Effect of time on contact angle at 0 gpt and 77 F.
Photo 2. Effect of NES concentration on contact angle at 77 F in NES/air

system.
Fig. 7. The average contact angle of NES-1 and NES-2 as a function of

concentration at 77 F.
SPRING 2015
71
concentrations at 77 F in the presence of condensate. As before, the average contact angle decreased when the NES concentration was increased. For example, the average contact
angle decreased from nearly 55 to almost 1.5 when the NES1 concentration was increased from 0 gpt to 3 gpt at 77 F,
Photo 3. It is obvious that in the presence of condensate, the
decrease in the contact angle with the NES concentration increase was more significant, compared to those observed in the
NES air system.
Capillary Pressure
Pc values at different NES concentrations were calculated from

values presented in Figs. 1, 2 and 7, based on Eqn. 1. Figures 9
to 12 present the Pc values at a pore radius of 0.01 m. It is
clear from Figs. 9 and 10 that the optimum concentration of
NES-1 and NES-2 is nearly 0.5 gpt. At various temperatures,
the Pc decreased with NES concentrations up to 0.5 gpt, after
which it increased with the increase in surfactant concentration. This behavior is attributed to the interplay of both the
positive effect (lower surface tension) and negative effect
(lower contact angle) of these surfactants. The average percentPhoto 3. Effect of condensate on NES contact angle at 77 F.
the sample was immersed in condensate; in that case, it was

found that the contact angle had decreased in the presence of
condensate. It is believed that in the experiment when the rock
substrate was immersed in condensate before placing the water
drop, a thin condensate film formed under the water drop.
This thin condensate film prevented the interaction of the water drop with the rock substrate and resulted in the large contact angle observed. Therefore, in all subsequent experiments,
the water drop was first placed on the rock substrate before it
was immersed in condensate.
Figure 8 shows the contact angles of NES drops at different
Fig. 9. Capillary pressure of NES-1/air as a function of concentration and
temperature.
Fig. 8. The average contact angle of NES-1 and NES-2 in the presence of
condensate as a function of concentration at 77 F.
72
SPRING 2015
Fig. 10. Capillary pressure of NES-2/air as a function of concentration and

temperature.
Both surfactants, NES-1 and NES-2, were effective in

lowering both the surface tension and the interfacial
tension of water-air and water-condensate systems at
temperatures of 77 F to 325 F.
The CMC of NES-1 and NES-2 is 0.5 gpt in the waterair system. Interfacial tension decreased with a NES
concentration increase in the water-condensate system
at various temperatures.
The NES did not exhibit any adsorption tendency with
formation rock. The surface tension remained constant
at CMC before and after the adsorption tests.
Fig. 11. Capillary pressure of NES-1/condensate as a function of concentration
and temperature.
The contact angle decreased with the NES concentration

increase at room temperature. The effect of NES on the
contact angle was even more pronounced in the
presence of condensate. The rock substrates became
more water-wet with the NES concentration increase.
The effect of NES on rock formation affinity was not
permanent. A contact angle for 0 gpt NES solution
remained at 55 before and after the sample was soaked
in 5 gpt NES solution at room temperature for 24
hours.
The Pc decreased with the NES concentration increase
in the water-air system. The lowest value was observed
at 0.5 gpt at different temperatures.
Fig. 12. Capillary pressure of NES-2/condensate as a function of concentration

and temperature.
age of reduction in Pc was nearly 19% to 27%. For example,

at 300 F, the Pc decreased from 650 psi to nearly 525 psi
when the NES-1 concentration was increased from 0 gpt to 0.5
gpt. The NES had a more pronounced effect on the Pc in the
presence of condensate, Figs. 11 and 12. Pc decreased with the
increase of the NES concentration, and the lowest value was
observed at the highest NES concentration. For example, the
Pc decreased from nearly 930 psi to 490 psi when the NES-1
concentration was increased from 0 gpt to 3 gpt at 325 F.
Compared to the NES air system, the percentage of reduction
in Pc in the NES condensate system was higher, ranging between 47% and 80%. This is mainly due to the significant effect of these surfactants on the interfacial tension of water and
condensate compared to that of the NES air system.
CONCLUSIONS
Several experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of
NES on interfacial tension, contact angle and Pc in both waterair and water-condensate systems to simulate conditions in gas
and gas condensate wells. These experiments were conducted
at different NES concentrations and temperature values from
77 F to 325 F. Based on this work, the main conclusions are:
The Pc decreased with the NES concentration increase

in the water-condensate system at different
temperatures. The lowest value was obtained with the
maximum NES concentration used.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, November 10-13, 2014.
REFERENCES
1. Kamath, J. and Laroche, C.: Laboratory-based Evaluation
of Gas Well Deliverability Loss Caused by Water
Blocking, Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, Vol. 8,
No. 1, March 2003, pp. 71-80.
2. Mahadevan, J. and Sharma, M.M.: Factors Affecting
Cleanup of Water Blocks: A Laboratory Investigation,
Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, Vol. 10, No. 3,
September 2005, pp. 238-246.
3. Holditch, S.A.: Factors Affecting Water Blocking and Gas
Flow from Hydraulically Fractured Gas Wells, Journal of
Petroleum Technology, Vol. 31, No. 12, December 1979,
pp. 1515-1524.
SPRING 2015
73
4. Ahmadi, M., Sharma, M.M., Pope, G., Torre, D.E.,

McCulley, C.A. and Linnemeyer, H.: Chemical Treatment
to Mitigate Condensate and Water Blocking in Gas Wells
in Carbonate Reservoirs, SPE Production and
Operations, Vol. 26, No. 1, February 2011, pp. 67-74.
5. Ali, J.K., Butler, S., Allen, L. and Wardle, P.: The
Influence of Interfacial Tension on Liquid Mobility in Gas
Condensate Systems, SPE paper 26783, presented at the
Offshore European Conference, Aberdeen, U.K., September
7-10, 1993.
6. Ahmed, T., Evans, J., Kwan, R. and Vivian, T.: Wellbore
Liquid Blockage in Gas-Condensate Reservoirs, SPE paper
51050, presented at the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting,
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, November 9-11, 1998.
7. Li, K. and Firoozabadi, A.: Experimental Study of
Wettability Alteration to Preferential Gas-Wetting in
Porous Media and Its Effects, SPE Reservoir Evaluation
and Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 2, April 2000, pp. 139-149.
8. Bang, V.S.S., Yuan, C., Pope, G.A., Sharma, M.M., Baran
Jr., J.R., Skildum, J., et al.: Improving Productivity of
Hydraulically Fractured Gas Condensate Wells by
Chemical Treatment, SPE paper 19599, presented at the
Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, May 58, 2008.
9. Franco, C.A., Zabala, R.D., Zapata, J., Mora, E., Botero,
O., Candela, C., et al.: Inhibited Gas Stimulation to
Mitigate Condensate Banking and Maximizing Recovery in
Cupiagua Field, SPE paper 151575, presented at the SPE
International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation
Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana, February 15-17,
2012.
10. Barnum, R.S., Brinkman, F.P., Richardson, T.W. and
Spillette, A.G.: Gas Condensate Reservoir Behaviour:
Productivity and Recovery Reduction due to
Condensation, SPE paper 30767, presented at the SPE
Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas,
Texas, October 22-25, 1995.
11. Mahadevan, J. and Sharma, M.M.: Clean-up of Water
Blocks in Low Permeability Formations, SPE paper
84216, presented at the SPE Annual Technical
Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, October
5-8, 2003.
12. McLeod, H.O. and Coulter, A.W.: The Use of Alcohol in
Gas Well Stimulation, SPE paper 1663, presented at the
SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Columbus, Ohio,
November 10-11, 1966.
13. Tang, G-Q. and Firoozabadi, A.: Relative Permeability
Modification in Gas/Liquid Systems through Wettability
to Intermediate Gas Wetting, SPE Reservoir Evaluation
and Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 6, December 2002, pp. 427436.
74
SPRING 2015
14. Bennion, D.B., Thomas, F.B. and Bietz, R.F.: Low

Permeability Gas Reservoirs: Problems, Opportunities
and Solutions for Drilling, Completion, Stimulation and
Production, SPE paper 35577, presented at the SPE Gas
Technology Symposium, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, April
28 - May 1, 1996.
15. Zhou, H., Dismuke, K.I., Lett, N.L. and Penny, G.S.:
Development of More Environmentally Friendly
Demulsifiers, SPE paper 151852, presented at the SPE
International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation
Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana, February 15-17,
2012.
16. Hirasaki, G.J., Miller, C.A. and Puerto, M.: Recent
Advances in Surfactant EOR, Society of Petroleum
Engineers Journal, Vol. 16, No. 4, December 2011, pp.
889-907.
17. Wang, D., Liu, C., Wu, W. and Wang, G.: Novel
Surfactants that Attain Ultra-Low Interfacial Tension
between Oil and High Salinity Formation Water without
Adding Alkali, Salts, Co-surfactants, Alcohols and
Solvents, SPE paper 127452, presented at the SPE EOR
Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia, Muscat, Oman,
April 11-13, 2010.
18. Toseef, A., Beaman, D.J. and Birou, P.: Viscoelastic
Surfactant Diversion: An Effective Way to Acidize Low
Temperature Wells, SPE paper 136574, presented at the
Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and
Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, November 1-4, 2010.
19. Adkins, S., Chen, X., Nquyen, Q.P., Sanders, A.W. and
Johnston, K.P.: Effect of Branching on the Interfacial
Properties of Nonionic Hydrocarbon Surfactants at the
Air-Water and Carbon Dioxide-Water Interfaces,
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, Vol. 346, No. 2,
pp. 455-463.
20. Wakamatsu, T. and Fuerstenau, D.W.: The Effect of
Hydrocarbon Chain Length on the Adsorption of
Sulfonates at the Solid/Water Interface, Advances in
Chemistry, Vol. 79, 1986, pp. 161-172.
21. Nasr-El-Din, H.A., AL-Othman, A.M., Taylor, K.C. and
Al-Ghamdi, A.H.: Surface Tension of Acid Stimulating
Fluids at High Temperatures, Journal of Petroleum
Science and Engineering, Vol. 43, 2004, pp. 57-73.
22. Hinkel, J.J., Brown, J.E., Gadiyar, B.R. and Beyer, E.:
New Environmentally Friendly Surfactant Enhances
Well Cleanup, SPE paper 82214, presented at the SPE
European Formation Damage Conference, The Hague,
The Netherlands, May 13-14, 2003.
23. Lawson, J.B.: The Adsorption of Nonionic and Anionic
Surfactants on Sandstone and Carbonate, SPE paper
7052, presented at the SPE Symposium on Improved
Methods of Oil Recovery, Tulsa, Oklahoma, April 16-19,
1978.
24. Rubio, J. and Kitchener, J.A.: The Mechanism of

Adsorption of Polyethylene Oxide Flocculent on Silica,
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, Vol. 57, No. 1,
October 1976, pp. 132-142.
25. Friberg, S. and Bothorel, P.: Microemulsions: Structure
and Dynamics, Chapter 2, CRC Press, Boca Raton,
Florida, 1987, 219 p.
BIOGRAPHIES
Mashhoor S. Al-Anazi joined Saudi
Aramco in March 2001 as a Lab
Scientist with the Research and
Development Center, and then was
moved to the Exploration and
ARC) to work as a Petroleum Engineer. He has worked on
several projects related to formation damage and
stimulation, water injection and water control.
In 2001, Mashhoor received his B.S. degree in Chemical
Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Dr. Mohammed H. Al-Khaldi is a
Petroleum Engineer in the Saudi
Aramcos Exploration and Petroleum
Research Center (EXPEC ARC). He
has more than 15 years of experience
in upstream research and technology.
Since joining Saudi Aramco, he has been involved in
applied research projects dealing with hydraulic/acid
fracturing, VES technology, formation damage mitigation,
corrosion control, drilling fluids and conformance control.
Currently, he is leading a group of 15 engineers and 10
technicians.
Mohammeds experience includes the investigation of
microbial corrosion by evaluating sulfate-reducing bacteria,
development of mechanical methods to remove iron sulfide
scale, and corrosion inhibition during acidizing of deep gas
wells. Additionally, he has designed and optimized water
shut-off techniques using gels and viscoelastic surfactants.
Mohammed developed a new acid treatment for acidsensitive crude oils of new oil field developments. He has
identified and provided field solutions to formation damage
occuring during drilling and completion of tight
unconventional gas reservoirs.
Mohammed has written more than 60 technical papers,
contributed to journals and many technial reports, and has
seven patents. He is an active member of the Society of

Petroleum Engineers (SPE) and has chaired SPE workshops
and conferences. In addition, Mohammed has been invited
to give presentations at various universities and research
organizations all over the globe. He is recognized as a lead
researcher worldwide in the field of formation damage and
well stimulation. Mohammed received the Vice Presidents
Recognition Award for significant contributions toward the
safe and successful completion of the first 100 fracture
treatments of gas wells and the 2011 GCC SPE Award for
best young professional technical paper.
He received his B.S. degree in Chemical Engineering
(KFUPM), Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, and his M.S. and Ph.D.
degrees in Petroleum Engineering from the University of
Adelaide, Adelaide, Southern Australia.
Alhasan B. Fuseni joined Saudi
Aramco in 2006 and is a member of
the Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery
(EOR) team of the Exploration and
ARC). Prior to joining Saudi Aramco,
he worked for the King Fahd University of Petroleum and
Minerals (KFUPM) Research Institute as a Research
Engineer, and for Hycal Energy Research, Calgary, Canada,
as an EOR technologist. Alhasan has taught an in-house
course on core flooding applications in chemical EOR at
EXPEC ARC, and he teaches the chemical EOR section of
the course on EOR at Saudi Aramcos Upstream
Professional Development Center. He has authored and
coauthored several papers in petroleum engineering and is
currently serving as a reviewer for Elseviers Journal of
Petroleum Science and Engineering.
Alhasan received both his B.S. and M.S. degrees in
Petroleum Engineering from KFUPM, Dhahran, Saudi
Arabia, in 1985 and 1987, respectively.
Khalid M. Al-Marshad is a Laboratory
Technician working with the
Formation Damage & Stimulation Unit
of Saudi Aramcos Exploration and
ARC). He joined Saudi Aramco in
2009 and began his training at the Industrial Training
Center, graduating in 2011. Khalids first assignment was in
the Eastern Region Distribution Department, where he
worked until May 2012. At that time, he was moved to his
current assignment.
SPRING 2015
75
At Saudi Aramco, our passion is enabling opportunity.

From the depths of the earth to the frontiers of the
human mind, were dedicated to fostering innovation,
unleashing potential, and applying science to develop
new solutions for the global energy challenge. As the
worlds preeminent energy and chemicals company, it is
our responsibility our privilege to maximize the
opportunity available in every hydrocarbon molecule we
produce. Thats how we contribute to our communities,
our industry, and our world. Saudi Aramco is there,
at the intersection of energy and opportunity,
building a better future for all.
76
SPRING 2015
SUBSCRIPTION ORDER FORM

To begin receiving the Saudi Aramco Journal of Technology at no charge, please complete this form.
Please print clearly.
Name ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Title __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Organization _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Address _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
City __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
State/Province ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Postal code _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Country _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
E-mail address _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Number of copies _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
TO ORDER
By phone/email:

JOT Distribution
+966-013-876-0498
william.bradshaw.1@aramco.com
By mail:

JOT Distribution
Box 5000
Dhahran 31311
Saudi Arabia
Current issues, select back issues and multiple copies of some issues are available upon request.
The Saudi Aramco Journal of Technology is published by the Saudi Aramco Public Relations Department,
Saudi Arabian Oil Company, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
SPRING 2015
77
GUIDELINES FOR SUBMITTING AN ARTICLE

TO THE SAUDI ARAMCO JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY
These guidelines are designed to simplify and help standardize
submissions. They need not be followed rigorously. If you
have additional questions, please feel free to contact us at
Public Relations. Our address and phone numbers are listed
on page 77.
Length
Varies, but an average of 2,500-3,500 words, plus

illustrations/photos and captions. Maximum length should
be 5,000 words. Articles in excess will be shortened.
Acknowledgments
Use to thank those who helped make the article possible.

Illustrations/tables/photos and explanatory text
Submit these separately. Do not place in the text. Positioning

in the text may be indicated with placeholders. Initial
submission may include copies of originals; however,
publication will require the originals. When possible, submit
both electronic versions, printouts and/or slides. Color is
preferable.
File formats
Illustration files with .EPS extensions work best. Other

acceptable extensions are .TIFF, .JPEG and .PICT.
What to send
Send text in Microsoft Word format via email or on disc, plus

one hard copy. Send illustrations/photos and captions
separately but concurrently, both as email or as hard copy
(more information follows under file formats).
Procedure
Notification of acceptance is usually within three weeks after

the submission deadline. The article will be edited for style
and clarity and returned to the author for review. All articles
are subject to the companys normal review. No paper can be
published without a signature at the manager level or above.
Format
No single article need include all of the following parts. The

type of article and subject covered will determine which parts
to include.
Working title
Abstract
Usually 100-150 words to summarize the main points.
Permission(s) to reprint, if appropriate
Previously published articles are acceptable but can be

published only with written permission from the copyright
holder.
Author(s)/contributor(s)
Please include a brief biographical statement.

Submission/Acceptance Procedures
Papers are submitted on a competitive basis and are evaluated

by an editorial review board comprised of various department
managers and subject matter experts. Following initial
selection, authors whose papers have been accepted for
publication will be notified by email.
Papers submitted for a particular issue but not accepted for
that issue will be carried forward as submissions for
subsequent issues, unless the author specifically requests in
writing that there be no further consideration. Papers
previously published or presented may be submitted.
Submit articles to:
Introduction
Different from the abstract in that it sets the stage for the
content of the article, rather than telling the reader what it
is about.
Main body
May incorporate subtitles, artwork, photos, etc.
Editor

C-86, Wing D, Building 9156
Tel: +966-013-876-0498
E-mail: william.bradshaw.1@aramco.com.sa
Submission deadlines
Conclusion/summary
Assessment of results or restatement of points in introduction.

Endnotes/references/bibliography
Use only when essential. Use author/date citation method in

the main body. Numbered footnotes or endnotes will be
converted. Include complete publication information.
Standard is The Associated Press Stylebook, 49th ed. and
Websters New World College Dictionary, 5th ed.
78
SPRING 2015
Issue
Paper submission deadline
Release date
Winter 2015
Spring 2016
Summer 2016
Fall 2016
September 1, 2015
December 1, 2015
March 1, 2016
June 1, 2016
December 31, 2015

March 31, 2016
June 30, 2016
September 30, 2016
Additional Content Available Online at: www.saudiaramco.com/jot.com
Formation Evaluation in Gas-Bearing Reservoirs Drilled with Na/K Formate WBM, Using LWD Time-Lapse
Data Acquisition
Kehinde M. Fakolujo, Ali R. Al-Belowi, Kais Gzara, Oluchukwu L. Onuigbo and Ihsan T. Pasaribu
ABSTRACT
The introduction of formate-based drilling muds has successfully addressed drilling challenges related to barite-weighted muds.
The new muds, however, exhibited peculiar petrophysical properties that adversely affected log interpretation. First, the mud
present inside the borehole and surrounding the tool required different environmental corrections. Second, invading mud filtrate
present inside the formation was difficult to account for. Because of the higher density, lower hydrogen index and high gamma
ray readings associated with Na/K formate-based drilling fluids, petrophysical analysis typically resulted in inaccurate
mineralogy and pessimistic porosity and permeability estimates. Such estimates also became strongly dependent on the extent of
invasion by the mud.
Creating Multiple Fractures in Cemented Horizontal Laterals: An Efficient Way to Improve Productivity of Tight
Carbonate Formations in Saudi Arabia
Dr. Zillur Rahim, Dr. Hamoud A. Al-Anazi, Adnan A. Al-Kanaan and Rifat Kayumov
ABSTRACT
During the last decade, significant efforts to develop gas reserves from relatively tight carbonate formations have been made in
the southern part of Saudi Arabia. An important role in this effort was played by the multistage acid fracturing technique,
which enables maximized reservoir contact by creating multiple fractures along the wellbore. Lessons learned from many such
treatments highlighted the following challenges related to open hole multistage fracturing (MSF) completions:
Communication between the stages.
Bottom-hole treating pressure (BHTP) dropping below the fracture gradient.
Limited reservoir contact due to only one fracture propagating between the open hole packers.
Development of New Kill Fluids with Minimum Sagging Problems for High-Pressure Jilh Formation in Saudi Arabia
Ziad A. Al-Abdullatif, Dr. Abdullah S. Al-Yami, Dr. Vikrant Wagle, Abdulaziz S. Bubshait and Ali M. Al-Safran
ABSTRACT
A successful kill fluid formulation for the overpressured Jilh formation has been achieved. The Jilh formation is a dolomitic
Middle Triassic tight zone that ranges from 8,000 ft to 10,000 ft true vertical depth (TVD) with abnormal saltwater pressure
that requires a kill fluid with a density up to 150 lb/ft3 (pcf) to stop reservoir flow. The addition of weighting materials, such as
barite (BaSO4) or hematite (Fe2O3), is needed for the kill fluid to achieve the desired density to produce hydrostatic pressure.
Subsequently maintaining a high volume of solids content whether for BaSO4 particles or any other weighting material in
suspension is challenging, especially for an extended period of time. Failing to do so is a phenomenon described in the industry
as static barite sag, and it may lead to serious well control incidents and lost circulation.
A Decade of Experience with Multiphase Flow Meters
Mohammad S. Al-Kadem, Dr. Faisal T. Al Khelaiwi, Ali S. Al-Mashhad and Mohammad S. Al Dabbous
ABSTRACT
Multiphase flow metering is considered one of the most essential technologies in well testing. Since the mid-1990s, multiphase
flow meters (MPFM) have evolved from a revolutionary new technology into a consolidated solution widely adopted by the
major operators worldwide. This evolution has taken place thanks to the high quality of measurements, the low operational
cost and the capability of enabling remote monitoring of well performance with ease. The meters have proven to be durable for
testing the oil wells of Saudi Aramcos fields.

Saudi Aramco Journal

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Saudi Aramco Journal

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Saudi Aramco Journal

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What are some of the challenges associated with formate-based drilling muds?

What are some of the challenges associated with formate-based drilling muds?

What are some challenges related to open hole multistage fracturing completions?

What are some challenges related to open hole multistage fracturing completions?

On the Cover

A concentric tubular structure of a multi-walled carbon nanotube

Buckyballs: With the development of nanomaterial, a series of

The Saudi Aramco Journal of Technology is

MORE SAUDI ARAMCO JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ARTICLES

EDITORIAL ADVISORS (CONTINUED)

Program Director, Technology

Manager, Research and Development Center

Pixel Creative Group, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.

Complete issues of the Journal in PDF format

Vice President, Southern Area Oil Operations

Executive Director, Exploration

Nanotechnology Can Overcome the Critical Issues

Dr. Md. Amanullah and Dr. Jothibasu Ramasamy

Intelligent Distributed Acoustic Sensing for In-well

Dr. Jinjiang Xiao, Mahmoud Farhadiroushan, Andy Clarke,

New Generation Inflow Control Device to Maximize Well

Technology Test Site: Value Proposition for a Live Field

Modiu L. Sanni, John T. Allen, Scott S. Jennings, Dr. Michael A. Jervis,

Intelligent Field Real-Time Data Reliability Key

Abdulrahman A. Al-Amer, Naser A. Al-Naser,

Use of the Rietveld Method for Describing Structure and

A Novel Semi-Analytical Solution for Transient Pressure

Use of Nano-Emulsion Surfactants during Hydraulic

THE SAUDI ARAMCO JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY

Nanotechnology Can Overcome the

Due to a progressively decreasing trend in finding easy oil and

SAUDI ARAMCO JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY

drilling and production environments. This is why the industry

CONVENTIONAL TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT

Fig. 1. Safe working temperature of conventional tools and equipment.

Fig. 2. Pressure and temperature regimes in normal and HPHT environments.

SAUDI ARAMCO JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY

offers a viable solution to ensure fail-safe operation of tools

Table 1. Drilling and completion gaps in a HPHT environment8

and trouble-free drilling operations in such an environment.

SAUDI ARAMCO JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY

Composite material is composed of two or more distinct

characteristics can be used to prepare nanocomposites for different applications.

phase material to demonstrate the effect of nanos in enhancing

NANOPHASE EFFECT ANALYSES

Based on the theoretically derived functional relations between

TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT WEIGHT REDUCTION

Weight Reduction (%)

Matrix Phase Density = 7.8 gm/cc

Dispersed Phase Density = 1.8

Matrix Phase Youngs Modulus = 208 (GA)

Dispersed Phase Youngs Modulus = 800 (GA)

SAUDI ARAMCO JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY

Matrix Phase Tensile Strength = 0.4 (GA)

Dispersed Phase Tensile Strength = 30 (GPa)

Fig. 3. Density of several conventional and nano-based materials.

Fig. 4. Weight reduction potential of tools and equipment using nanocomposite

SAUDI ARAMCO JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY

the same application of nanomaterials in the manufacture of

Fig. 5. Tensile strength of several conventional and nano-based materials.