Historical Background of Computational Chemistry: I. The Ancients
Historical Background of Computational Chemistry: I. The Ancients
Historical Background of Computational Chemistry: I. The Ancients
I. The Ancients:
5th Century BC Earliest publication of conflicting chemical theories.
Empedocles: All matter composed of four infinitely divisible elements, Earth,
Air, Fire, and Water
Democritus: All matter composed of indivisible "atoms."
4th Century BC Early example of the danger of purely theoretical chemistry.
Aristotle advocates Empedocles's four element model, which dominates chemical
theory until the 18th century.
Increased Safety:
Comparison of combustion products of sarin and non-toxic simulants.
Faster Turnaround:
Pyrolysis rate of sulfur mustard gas.
Better Accuracy:
Heats of formation for neutral, first row molecules.
Improved Understanding:
Novel metabolic pathway for AIA mutagens.
Caveat:
Computational chemistry is far from black box--Care must be taken in
choice of method and interpretation of results.
Both ab initio methods and empirical molecular mechanics potentials calculate the
electronic energy, which can be related to the thermodynamic enthalpy by including
several additional energy terms:
For gas-phase reactions the rotational, translational and PV terms can approximated
using expressions for ideal gases (see McQuarrie, 1977, chapter 8 for higher-order
corrections to these terms):
The zero-point and temperature-dependent vibrational terms are functions of the
molecule's 3N-6 vibrational modes:
The direction of chemical reactions is determined by the sign of the change in the Gibb's
free energy (G) which can be related to enthalpy by including the entropy.
Entropy can usually be reliably determined from standard expressions (see Hout, et al.,
1982):
Pauling Points
Computational chemists sometimes describe a local minimum on the Error/Effort curve
as a Pauling point. (I.e. a place were good results are achieved at a minimal amount of
effort.) Note that this term is not pejorative, since all computational chemical methods
are based on judicious cancellation of errors.
Atomic Units
Most quantum chemical software is written using atomic units (a.u.) which simplify the
equations. Atomic units are derived from fundamental quantities in chemical physics:
Quantity
Name
Physical Significance
Value in SI units*
Energy
Hartree
2x ionization energy of H
4.3597482 x10-18J
Length
Bohr
0.529177249 x10-10m
Charge
Electron's charge
1.60217733 x10-19C
Mass
Electon's mass
9.1093898 x10-31kg
Velocity
2.1876914 x10-6m/s
Time
2.4188843 x10-17s
*1986 CODATA recommended values: E.C. Cohen and B.N. Taylor, Journal of
Research of the National Bureau of Standards, 92, 82, (1987).
Units
A very wide variety of units are used in the computational chemical literature and in the
inputs and outputs of chemical software, so it's important to be always confirm that
results are physically reasonable.
Bond distances are usually in angstroms () or Bohr. 1 = 0.529177 Bohr.
The most common energy units and their interconversion factors are:
Units
1 Hartree=
Hartree
kcal/mole
e.v.
cm-1
kJ/mole*
Hz
1
1.59360E- 1.00000E+ 4.33641E- 3.49755E+ 5.03217E+ 4.18400E+
1.04854E+13
kcal/mole=
03
00
02
02
02
00
1 e.v.=
1 cm-1=
1 K=
1 Kilo J=
1 Hz=
16
14
15
11
11
13
1.09
1.00
0.96
1.54
1.47
1.43
1.76
1.57
1.35
1.30
1.22
1.47
Diatomic Bonds
(kcal/mole)
H-H
104
O=O
119
N=N
226
H-F
135
H-Cl
103
H-Br
88
H-I
71
F-F
37
Cl-Cl
58
Br-Br
46
I-I
36
H-C
H-N
H-O
C-C
C-N
C-O
C-Cl
C-F
C=C
C=N
C=O
C%C
Polyatomic Bonds
(kcal/mole)
99
93
111
83
73
86
81
116
146
147
179
200
*From J.B. Hendrickson, D.J. Cram, and G.S. Hammond, Organic Chemistry, New
York: McGraw-Hill (1970). For a comprehensive listing of bond lengths see: F.H. Allen,
et al. Journal of the Chemical Society Perkins Transactions II (1987): S1-S19.